DOCSLIB.ORG

Iran and the Gulf Military Balance IFINREV5 3.10.16

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Iran and the Gulf Military Balance IFINREV5 3.10.16 Iran and the Gulf Military Balance Anthony H. Cordesman and Abdullah Toukan Working Draft October 3, 2016 1616 Rhode Island Avenue NW Anthony H. Cordesman Web version: Email: [email protected] Washington, DC 20036 Phone: 1.202.775.3270 www.csis.org/burke Acknowledgements: This analysis draws in part on the work of Charles Ayers and Joseph Kendall in preparing and updating the graphic analyses and force comparisons, and Max Markusen in editing and updating. 10/3/16 2 Table of Contents Title Pages The Changing Gulf Balance 4-7 The Iranian Threat: An Uncertain Mix of Positives and Negatives 8-17 The Military Spending Gap 18-22 The Modernization Gap 23-40 U.S. and Outside Allied Forces: The Other Forces Impacting on the Regional Balance 41-58 Comparative Military Manpower 59-62 The Challenge of Asymmetric Warfare: Intimidation, Deterrence, and Warfighting from Iran and Non-State Actors 63-77 The Land Balance in the Gulf 78-89 The Air Balance in the Gulf 90-119 The Naval Balance in the Gulf 119-124 Closing the Gulf: The Iranian Naval-Missile-Air Threat to Maritime Traffic 125-146 Missile Forces and Threats 147-169 Missile Wars and Missile Defense 170-177 The Uncertain Nuclear and WMD Threat 178-196 10/3/16 3 The Changing Gulf Balance 10/3/16 4 The Changing Gulf Balance - I • The classic military balance in the Gulf region is driven by an accelerating arms race between Iran and its Arab Gulf Neighbors. The Arab countries are decisively winning this arms race. • This aspect of the balance is also shaped by outside forces, particularly by the level of U.S. commitment and power projection capability to assisting its Arab security partners, although Russia and China are potential wild cards. • The balance, however, is also increasingly shaped by internal conflicts and divisions in Iraq, Syria, and Yemen and the impact of “failed state wars” on the relative strategic influence of Iran versus other Arab states and U.S. •It is also shaped by Iran’s steadily improving capabilities for asymmetric warfare in supporting pro-Iran elements in Arab states, in developing the capability to threaten maritime traffic in and near the Gulf, and to pose a ballistic and cruise missile threat to its Arab neighbors that compensates for its limited conventional capabilities. 10/3/16 5 The Changing Gulf Balance - II • The threat of violent religious extremism, and the growing impact of non-state actors both pose another major set of threats, and make counterterrorism and counterinsurgency increasingly important aspects of the military balance. • The P5+1 (JCPOA) nuclear agreement with Iran delays, but does not end the nuclear and WMD competition between Iran and its Arab neighbors and the U.S. • The end result seems to be a high level of mutual deterrence between regional states, mixed with extremist challenges by non-state actors which do not show any such restraint. This does not, however, prevent threats to use force by state actors in “wars of intimidation,” low level incidents, or proxy wars in competing to support other forces. • It is also a complex mix of different and asymmetric forces, and possible approaches to warfighting, creates a significant risk that Arab-Iranian conflicts can start or escalate through miscalculation in unpredictable ways. 10/3/16 6 The Changing Gulf Balance - III • The risk of conflict is also driven by the actions of non-state actors and violent extremists and the uncertain internal stability of many regional states. • These internal stability risks are compounded by sectarian, ethnic, and tribal tensions, particularly ethnic tensions between Arabs, Persians, and Kurds, and Sunnis and Shi’ites. • There has been a massive regional increase in internal security activity, forces, and costs. The data on these aspects of the balance are so suspect, however, that it is not possible to assess the trend and scale in quantitative terms. • The “civil balance” in terms of the nature of politics, quality of governance, corruption, economic development and sharing of wealth, social changes from factors like hyperurbanization, massive population growth and youth employment problems, has generally deteriorated since the uprisings of 2011, and is now affected by massive cuts in petroleum export and tourism income and limited investment. 10/3/16 7 The Iranian Threat: An Uncertain Mix of Positives and Negatives 10/3/16 8 Iran: Threat or “Competitor” Non-Military Competition • Ideology, religion, and political systems • “Terrorism” and violent extremism vs. “counterterrorism” • Energy, sanctions, and global economic impacts • Arms control, arms exports, and arms imports • International diplomacy Military Competition • W eapons of mass destruction • Conventional forces • Asymmetric and irregular warfare • P roxy use of state and non-state actors • Threat and intimidation Nations and Sub-Regions of Competition • Gulf Cooperation Council countries • Y emen • Iraq • Jordan • Syria • Lebanon • Israel • Gaza and West Bank • P akistan • Turkey • Afghanistan • Central Asia • Europe • Russia • China • Japan and Asia • V enezuela, Cuba, Brazil 10/3/16 9 Assessing the Full Range of Competition 10 Rhetoric vs. Reality • Reinforcement of Supreme Leader and political rhetoric vs. often solid military assessments and study of western and outside positions. • Statements can defeat all attacks versus focus on defense in depth • Capability to “close the Gulf” vs. steadily upgrading asymmetric capabilities and real world limits. • Nuclear denial vs. nuclear efforts; exaggeration of missile capabilities. • Claims of modernization versus real world limits and failures. • Real but exaggerated progress in Asymmetric warfare. • Exaggerated claims to military production and technology versus limited reality • Claimed focus on US and Israel versus focus on Israel and GCC • Denial/Understatement of links to non-state actors: Hamas, Hizbollah, Iraqi militias, Afghan Northern Alliance 10/3/16 11 Key Positives for Iran • The US is Iran’s “Secret Ally:” Invasion of Iraq and aftermath; Messing up Syria from the start, Uncertain & slipping nuclear “redline,” faltering effort in Afghanistan, loss of allied confidence, in Egypt. • Success in Lebanon, growing Syrian dependence, ties to Iraqi Shi’ites, presence in Western Afghanistan and role with Hazaras. • Lack of progress and coherence in GCC forces. • Instability of Yemen and Shi’ite populations in Bahrain, Saudi Arabia, other GCC states, Yemen. • Asymmetric warfare progress, reposturing, Al Quds, cyber, etc. • Missile and nuclear progress. • Real progress in modernization, adaptation, selective imports. • Integration of regular and revolutionary forces. •Restructuring of Basij, internal security forces. 10/3/16 12 US Destruction of Iraq’s Major Forces - I 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 0 Combat Combat Main Battle Main Battle Aircraft: Aircraft: Tanks: 2003 Tanks: 2012 2003 2012 Iran 1565 1663 283 336 Iraq 2200 336 316 3 Source: Adapted from IISS, The Military Balance 2013, various editions and Jane’s Sentinel series. 10/3/16 13 US Destruction of Iraq’s Major Forces – 2003 vs. 2013 10/3/16 14 The Limited Recovery of Iraq’s Forces: 2003 vs. 2016 10/3/16 15 Key Negatives for Iran • Unstable Lebanon, Iraq, Afghanistan, Uncertain Hamas. • US-led progress, C4I/ISAR, and training progress in GCC forces; Broad Arab treatment of Iran as threat. • Rising Sunni versus Shi’ite tensions; limits to Shi’ite acceptance of Supreme Leader, any form of Iranian control or proxy role. • High level of effectiveness in limits to arms, technology, and production imports. •Lack of Power projection assets, maneuver capability, sustained air capability, and geography of Gulf • Sanctions/delays in nuclear program, impact on military spending, stability. • Lack of nuclear and other WMD weapons, long-rang precision strike capability. Israeli, Pakistani, US nuclear/missile forces in being; US conventional long-range strike capability. • Instability of Yemen and Shi’ite populations in Bahrain, Saudi Arabia, other GCC states, Yemen. • Limits to asymmetric warfare progress, reposturing, Al Quds, cyber, etc. 10/3/16 16 Key Potential Pivots Shaping the Future • Iran deploys functional nuclear forces. • US or Israeli preventive strikes. • Missiles with terminal guidance, extreme accuracy. (w/ or w/o ,missile defenses. • Serious (Shi’ite) unrest in Saudi Arabia and Bahrain. • US tensions with GCC states (and Egypt/Jordan). Excessive US force cuts, spending crisis • Iran access to most modern Russian and Chinese arms: advanced fighters, S- 300/S-400 etc. • Major clash in Gulf • Assad victory or defeat in civil war; clear polarization of Iraq. • Serious Iranian political upheavals, power struggle. • Hostile Iranian involvement in post-2015 • Real Iran-Iraq-Syria-Hezbollah axis. • New Arab-Israel Conflict. 10/3/16 17 The Military Spending Gap 10/3/16 18 Military Spending • Trends sharply favor Arab states even if impact of U.S. and European spending on power projection is ignored. • Estimates are uncertain. Iran and other Gulf states may conceal significant security spending off budget. But, unlikely to affect trends or scale of difference. •Iran has advantage from low-cost conscription, control of state industries. • Lack of coordination, standardization, and interoperability by Gulf states greatly reduces impact of their advantage in spending. • But, Iran’s programs have uncertain management, and Iran has massive disadvantage because of lack of access to modern and high performance arms imports. • Arab Gulf states can surge arms imports and funding of outside
Load more

Recommended publications
  • ISSUE 5 AADH05 OFC+Spine.Indd 1 the Mortar Company
    ARTILLERY AND AIR DEFENCE ARTILLERY ISSUE 5 HANDBOOK HANDBOOK – ISSUE 5 PUBLISHED MARCH 2018 THE CONCISE GLOBAL INDUSTRY GUIDE ARTILLERY AND AIR DEFENCE AADH05_OFC+spine.indd 1 3/16/2018 10:18:59 AM The Mortar Company. CONFRAG® CONTROLS – THE NEW HIGH EXPLOSIVE STANDARD HDS has developed CONFRAG® technology to increase the lethal performance of the stan- dard High Explosive granade for 60 mm CDO, 60 mm, 81 mm and 120 mm dramatically. The HE lethality is increased by controlling fragmentation mass and quantity, fragment velocity and fragment distribution, all controlled by CONFRAG® technology. hds.hirtenberger.com AADH05_IFC_Hirtenberger.indd 2 3/16/2018 9:58:03 AM CONTENTS Editor 3 Introduction Tony Skinner. [email protected] Grant Turnbull, Editor of Land Warfare International magazine, welcomes readers to Reference Editors Issue 5 of Shephard Media’s Artillery and Air Defence Handbook. Ben Brook. [email protected] 4 Self-propelled howitzers Karima Thibou. [email protected] A guide to self-propelled artillery systems that are under development, in production or being substantially modernised. Commercial Manager Peter Rawlins [email protected] 29 Towed howitzers Details of towed artillery systems that are under development, in production or Production and Circulation Manager David Hurst. being substantially modernised. [email protected] 42 Self-propelled mortars Production Elaine Effard, Georgina Kerridge Specifications for self-propelled mortar systems that are under development, in Georgina Smith, Adam Wakeling. production or being substantially modernised. Chairman Nick Prest 53 Towed mortars Descriptions of towed heavy mortar systems that are under development, in CEO Darren Lake production or being substantially modernised.
    [Show full text]
  • Hezbollah's Missiles and Rockets
    JULY 2017 CSIS BRIEFS CSIS Hezbollah’s Missiles and Rockets An Overview By Shaan Shaikh and Ian Williams JULY 2018 THE ISSUE Hezbollah is the world’s most heavily armed non-state actor, with a large and diverse stockpile of unguided artillery rockets, as well as ballistic, antiair, antitank, and antiship missiles. Hezbollah views its rocket and missile arsenal as its primary deterrent against Israeli military action, while also useful for quick retaliatory strikes and longer military engagements. Hezbollah’s unguided rocket arsenal has increased significantly since the 2006 Lebanon War, and the party’s increased role in the Syrian conflict raises concerns about its acquisition of more sophisticated standoff and precision-guided missiles, whether from Syria, Iran, or Russia. This brief provides a summary of the acquisition history, capabilities, and use of these forces. CENTER FOR STRATEGIC & middle east INTERNATIONAL STUDIES program CSIS BRIEFS | WWW.CSIS.ORG | 1 ezbollah is a Lebanese political party public source information and does not cover certain topics and militant group with close ties to such as rocket strategies, evolution, or storage locations. Iran and Syria’s Assad regime. It is the This brief instead focuses on the acquisition history, world’s most heavily armed non-state capabilities, and use of these forces. actor—aptly described as “a militia trained like an army and equipped LAND ATTACK MISSILES AND ROCKETS like a state.”1 This is especially true Hwith regard to its missile and rocket forces, which Hezbollah 107 AND 122 MM KATYUSHA ROCKETS has arrayed against Israel in vast quantities. The party’s arsenal is comprised primarily of small, man- portable, unguided artillery rockets.
    [Show full text]
  • Man Portable Missiles Vs Airliners
    TECHNOLOGY EXPLAINED by Carlo Kopp MAN PORTABLE MISSILES VS AIRLINERS The recent media debate over the dubious in terms of the number of missiles threat of terrorists using MAN Port- fired and the number of aircraft which recov- able Air Defence Systems (MANPADS) ered safely after taking hits. or shoulder launched surface-to-air The game changes very much if the tar- missiles against airliners understates get is not a military aircraft hardened to in many respects the complexities of sustain and survive enemy fire, and flown the issue involved. tactically to make life very difficult for the With hundreds of thousands of rounds MANPADS shooter. An airliner on takeoff manufactured worldwide since the 1960s, is close to an ideal target for a MANPADS – MANPADS are among the most common low, slow, heavily laden with kerosene, guided weapons in service, and a technol- unmanoeuvrable, emitting a vast infrared ogy which is almost impossible to prevent signature and presenting a large area to hit from proliferating. Expectations that bor- even by a missile which has relatively inac- der controls and interdiction will success- curate homing guidance. fully prevent such weapons from falling There are no simple panacea solutions to into the hands of terrorists are quite unreal- the MANPADS threat, as will become obvi- istic, at best such measures can only slow ous with a closer exploration. down the problem. Like narcotics, MANPADS are a compact A MENAGERIE OF MISSILES high value commodity which are easily con- The first MANPADS to enter operational cealed and easily smuggled. In the hands of a service was the US Army’s FIM-43A Redeye, competent operator who knows how to ex- introduced during the early 1960s and pro- ploit the strengths of these weapons, they duced until 1970.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Responses to U.S.-China Competition in the Indo-Pacific: India
    Regional Responses to U.S.-China Competition in the Indo-Pacific India Jonah Blank C O R P O R A T I O N For more information on this publication, visit www.rand.org/t/RR4412z2 For more information on this series, visit www.rand.org/US-PRC-influence Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available for this publication. ISBN: 978-1-9774-0650-7 Published by the RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif. © Copyright 2021 RAND Corporation R® is a registered trademark. Cover: globe: jcrosemann/GettyImages; flags: luzitanija/Adobe Stock Limited Print and Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions. The RAND Corporation is a research organization that develops solutions to public policy challenges to help make communities throughout the world safer and more secure, healthier and more prosperous. RAND is nonprofit, nonpartisan, and committed to the public interest. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors. Support RAND Make a tax-deductible charitable contribution at www.rand.org/giving/contribute www.rand.org Preface The U.S. Department of Defense’s (DoD’s) National Defense Strategy highlights the important role that U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Worldwide Equipment Guide Volume 2: Air and Air Defense Systems
    Dec Worldwide Equipment Guide 2016 Worldwide Equipment Guide Volume 2: Air and Air Defense Systems TRADOC G-2 ACE–Threats Integration Ft. Leavenworth, KS Distribution Statement: Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. 1 UNCLASSIFIED Worldwide Equipment Guide Opposing Force: Worldwide Equipment Guide Chapters Volume 2 Volume 2 Air and Air Defense Systems Volume 2 Signature Letter Volume 2 TOC and Introduction Volume 2 Tier Tables – Fixed Wing, Rotary Wing, UAVs, Air Defense Chapter 1 Fixed Wing Aviation Chapter 2 Rotary Wing Aviation Chapter 3 UAVs Chapter 4 Aviation Countermeasures, Upgrades, Emerging Technology Chapter 5 Unconventional and SPF Arial Systems Chapter 6 Theatre Missiles Chapter 7 Air Defense Systems 2 UNCLASSIFIED Worldwide Equipment Guide Units of Measure The following example symbols and abbreviations are used in this guide. Unit of Measure Parameter (°) degrees (of slope/gradient, elevation, traverse, etc.) GHz gigahertz—frequency (GHz = 1 billion hertz) hp horsepower (kWx1.341 = hp) Hz hertz—unit of frequency kg kilogram(s) (2.2 lb.) kg/cm2 kg per square centimeter—pressure km kilometer(s) km/h km per hour kt knot—speed. 1 kt = 1 nautical mile (nm) per hr. kW kilowatt(s) (1 kW = 1,000 watts) liters liters—liquid measurement (1 gal. = 3.785 liters) m meter(s)—if over 1 meter use meters; if under use mm m3 cubic meter(s) m3/hr cubic meters per hour—earth moving capacity m/hr meters per hour—operating speed (earth moving) MHz megahertz—frequency (MHz = 1 million hertz) mach mach + (factor) —aircraft velocity (average 1062 km/h) mil milliradian, radial measure (360° = 6400 mils, 6000 Russian) min minute(s) mm millimeter(s) m/s meters per second—velocity mt metric ton(s) (mt = 1,000 kg) nm nautical mile = 6076 ft (1.152 miles or 1.86 km) rd/min rounds per minute—rate of fire RHAe rolled homogeneous armor (equivalent) shp shaft horsepower—helicopter engines (kWx1.341 = shp) µm micron/micrometer—wavelength for lasers, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • 9K38 Igla - Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia Page 1
    9K38 Igla - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Page 1 9K38Igla FromWikipedia,thefreeencyclopedia (RedirectedfromIgla) The 9K38 Igla (Russian:9К38«Игла́»; Igla English: needle)isaRussian/Sovietman- portableinfraredhomingsurface-to-airmissile (SAM)."9K38"istheRussianGRAU designationofthesystem.ItsUSDoD Type short-rangeanti-airmissile designationis SA-18 andNATOreporting Servicehistory nameis Grouse. In service 1983 Productionhistory Contents Manufacturer KBM Unit cost USD60,000–80,000(asof2003) 1History Specifications 1.1Igla-1 Weight 10.8kg 1.2Igla Length 1.574m 2Othervariants Diameter 72mm 3Comparisoncharttoother MANPADS Warhead 1.17kgwith390gexplosive 4UseinallegedplotagainstAirForce Detonation contactandgrazingfuzes One mechanism 5Operators 5.1Igla-1E(SA-16) Engine solidfuelrocketmotor 5.2Igla(SA-18) Operational 5.2km 6Otheruses range Flightceiling 3.5km Speed 700m/s,aboutMach2 History Guidance twocolorinfrared system DevelopmentoftheIglashort-rangeman- portableairdefencemissile(MANPADS) beganintheKolomnaOKBin1971.Contrarytowhatiscommonlyreported,theIglaisnotan improvedversionoftheearlierStrelafamily(Strela-2/SA-7andStrela-3/SA-14),butanallnew project.Themaingoalsweretocreateamissilewithbetterresistancetocountermeasuresand widerengagementenvelopethantheearlierStrelaseriesMANPADSsystems. Technicaldifficultiesinthedevelopmentquicklymadeitobviousthatthedevelopmentwouldtake farlongerthananticipatedhowever,andin1978theprogramsplitintwo:whilethedevelopment of thefull-capabilityIglawouldcontinue,asimplifiedversion(Igla-1)withasimplerIRseekerbased
    [Show full text]
  • Fire and Forget: the Proliferation of Man-Portable Air Defence Systems
    Issue Brief Number 9 August 2014 Fire and Forget The Proliferation of Man-portable Air Defence Systems in Syria Introduction statements by government officials. and Soviet-designed systems or These account s document the foreign variants. Since the start of Syria’s civil war in acquisition and use of increasingly There is no publicly available 2011, the country has become a advanced MANPADS by Syrian evidenc e to support claims by the hotbe d of arms trafficking and armed groups, includin g systems not Russian government that armed proliferati on of conventional previously seen outside of govern- groups in Syria have acquired weapons. Imag es and accounts of the ment control. US FIM-92 Stinger-series conflict reveal that armed groups MANPADS or foreign Stinger- Major findings from this Issue Brief pattern systems. have acquired a variety of small arms include the following: and light weapon s, some of which International transfers of are rece nt-generation systems that Armed groups in Syria have acqu- MANPADS to armed groups in are rarely encount ered outside of ired at least eight models of Syria appear to violate resolutions, government control elsewhere. MANPA DS, including three guide lines, and agreements Among the most sensitive of these models not previously seen adopted by several multilateral weapons are the numerous man- outsid e of government control in organizations. portable air defence systems other countries. These MANPADS Video footage of armed groups and (MANPADS) that armed groups have include recent-generation systems. their arsenals is useful for identi- looted from Syria n government The vast majority of MANPADS fying the types of MANPADS in depots and acquir ed from other acquired by Syrian armed groups Syria but provides little insight into sources.
    [Show full text]
  • In Russia's Shadow: China's Rising Security Presence in Central Asia
    No. 52 l May 2020 KENNAN CABLE Opening ceremony of the SCO joint military exercises Peace Mission-2018, held in Chelyabinsk, Russia Source/Photo Credit: China Western Theatre Command In Russia’s Shadow: China’s Rising Security Presence in Central Asia By Bradley Jardine and Edward Lemon On April 2, a plane carrying 500 kilos of testing dominance recedes in favor of Beijing, dropping from equipment and PPE from China landed in Almaty.1 A 80 percent of the region’s total trade in the 1990s ($110 similar flight landed in Tashkent on March 30 and a billion) to just two-thirds that of Beijing’s today ($18.6 team of 10 medical specialists from China arrived in billion), it nevertheless remains the dominant security Kyrgyzstan on April 21.2 Not to be outdone by China’s guarantor in the region.5 Russia has accounted for 62 “virus diplomacy,” Russia has donated 17,000 test kits percent of the regional arms market over the past five to Kyrgyzstan3 and 2,000 to Tajikistan.4 These latest years and maintains substantial military infrastructure moves in response to COVID-19 are part of an ongoing in three out of five of the republics.6 Moscow has struggle between Russia and China over influence in also rapidly expanded its security drills and training in Central Asia. strategic Tajik border regions, and it launched its first lethal strike on Afghanistan since 1989 from Tajikistan in Central Asia is undergoing a significant geopolitical 2018. transition as Russia and China each work to strengthen their influence in the region.
    [Show full text]
  • Former Warsaw Pact Ammunition Handbook
    NATO Explosive Ordnance Disposal Centre of Excellence - Slovak Republic FORMER WARSAW PACT AMMUNITION HANDBOOK VOLUME 2 Land Forces Ammunition _ Rockets and Missiles TRENČÍN 2015 For Official Use Only FORMER WARSAW PACT AMMUNITION HANDBOOK VOLUME 2 Land Forces Ammunition _ Rockets and Missiles The NATO Explosive Ordnance Centre of Excellence (NATO EOD COE) supports the efforts of the Alliance in the areas of training and education, information sharing, doctrine development and concepts validation. Published by NATO EOD Centre of Excellence Ivana Olbrachta 5, 911 01 Trenčín, Slovak Republic Tel. + 421 333 502, Fax + 421 960 333 504 www.eodcoe.org A Book of Papers – Former Warsaw Pact Ammunition Handbook VOL 2 ISBN 978-80-89261-58-1 © EOD Centre of Excellence. All rights reserved 2015 No part of this book may be used or reproduced in any manner without the written permission of the publisher, except in the case brief quotations embodied in articles and reviews. Explosive Ordnance Disposal Centre of Excellence Foreword Even though in areas of current NATO operations the insurgency is mainly using the Home Made Explosive as the main charge for emplaced IEDs, our EOD troops have to cope with the use of the conventional ammunition in any form and size all around the world. To assist in saving EOD Operators’ lives and to improve their effectiveness at ammunition disposal, it is essential to possess the adequate level of experience and knowledge about the respective type of ammunition. The identified information gap on conventional ammunition produced in the past in Former Warsaw Pact countries has led the NATO EOD Centre of Excellence to develop a product enabling mitigation of this shortfall.
    [Show full text]
  • The Military Balance Chapter Five: Russia and Eurasia
    This article was downloaded by: [RFE/RL Prague Library], [Mr Martina Boudova] On: 11 February 2015, At: 01:21 Publisher: Routledge Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: Mortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK The Military Balance Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/tmib20 Chapter Five: Russia and Eurasia Published online: 10 Feb 2015. Click for updates To cite this article: (2015) Chapter Five: Russia and Eurasia, The Military Balance, 115:1, 159-206, DOI: 10.1080/04597222.2015.996357 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/04597222.2015.996357 PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE Taylor & Francis makes every effort to ensure the accuracy of all the information (the “Content”) contained in the publications on our platform. However, Taylor & Francis, our agents, and our licensors make no representations or warranties whatsoever as to the accuracy, completeness, or suitability for any purpose of the Content. Any opinions and views expressed in this publication are the opinions and views of the authors, and are not the views of or endorsed by Taylor & Francis. The accuracy of the Content should not be relied upon and should be independently verified with primary sources of information. Taylor and Francis shall not be liable for any losses, actions, claims, proceedings, demands, costs, expenses, damages, and other liabilities whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with, in relation to or arising out of the use of the Content. This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes.
    [Show full text]
  • IGLA 9K38 / SA-18 / GROUSE SURFACE-TO-AIR MISSILE What Is It
    IGLA 9K38 / SA-18 / GROUSE SURFACE-TO-AIR MISSILE What is it It is a anti-aircraft missile, from the surface-to-air missile family known as the SAM’S It has an infra-red seeker and guidance system, which gives it the capability to lock onto the infra-red light waves given off by the engines on air craft. Specifications Also referred to as MANPADS (man portable air defense systems) Place of origin Soviet Union Service history 1983 – present Unit cost $60,000 to $80,000 from original supplier (KBM), much cheaper on black market Weight 10.8kg Length 1.574m Diameter 72mm Warhead 1.17 kg (2.6 lb) with 390 g (14 oz) explosive Engine solid fuel rocket motor Operational range 5.2 km (3.2 mi) Flight ceiling 3.5 km (11,000 ft) Speed 800 m/s (peak), about Mach 2.3 Guidance system two color infrared Why is it different from the previous designs The development of the Igla short-range man-portable air defense system (MANPADS) began in the Kolomna OKB in 1972. Contrary to what is commonly reported, the Igla is not an improved version of the earlier Strela family (Strela-2/SA- 7 and Strela-3/SA-14), but an all new project. The main goals were to create a missile with better resistance to countermeasures and wider engagement envelope than the earlier Strela series MANPADS systems. Igla-1 The 9K310 Igla-1 system and its 9M313 missile were accepted into service in the Soviet army on 11 March 1981. The main differences from the Strela-3 included an optional Identification Friend or Foe system to prevent firing on friendly aircraft, an automatic lead and
    [Show full text]
  • EURASIA New Russian MANPADS Supports Integrated Air Defense
    EURASIA New Russian MANPADS Supports Integrated Air Defense OE Watch Commentary: The accompanying excerpted article from Izvestiya discusses Russia’s newest MANPADS system, the 9K333 Verba, which is replacing the 9K38 Igla. As the passage discusses, the Verba will be significantly different from its predecessors. Aside from better flight characteristics and tracking capabilities and unlike earlier MANPADS, the Verba is designed to be capable of functioning in an integrated air defense system, and as a stand-alone system. This integration can be accomplished through simply using portable radar systems such as the 1L122 Garmon to conduct tipping and cueing, or more advanced ways such as in conjunction with multiple sensors, a layered defense and a formal mobile headquarters. In addition, the article discusses that the Verba is equipped with a “unique aiming system with elements of augmented reality,” enabling it to “shoot down aircraft and helicopters, even if the targets have not yet entered the Air Defense missile complex operator’s field of view.” The Soviet Union fielded its first Man-Portable Air-Defense System (MANPADS), the 9K32 Strela-2 in 1968. Egypt’s use of a Strela-2 to shoot down an Israeli A-4 Skyhawk on 19 August 1969, was the first successful employment of a man portable air defense system in combat conditions. End OE Watch Commentary (Bartles) “The “Verba” portable air defense missile complex has obtained a unique aiming system with elements of augmented reality...” Source: Roman Kretsul, Bogdan Stepovoy, and Aleksey Ramm, “Жизненная цель: ПЗРК оснащают элементами дополненной реальности (A Vital Target: They Will Equip MANPADSs with Elements of Augmented Reality),” Izvestiya Online, 1 August 2019.
    [Show full text]