DOCSLIB.ORG

4. Marie Curie, Ethics and Research

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
4. Marie Curie, Ethics and Research CATHERINE MILNE 4. MARIE CURIE, ETHICS AND RESEARCH INTRODUCTION Recently Chemistry and Engineering News (Bard, Prestwich, Wight, Heller, & Zimmerman, 2010) carried a series of commentaries on the culture of academic research in chemistry with a focus on the role of funding in research. Initially, Alan Bard decried how decisions about tenure seem more and more to focus on grant getting rather than consideration of the applicant’s accomplishments generated because of access to this funding. Bard argued further that often this funding was based, not on the quality of the proposed research but on a researcher’s ability to “hype their research” and damming truth in the process (Bard et al., 2010, p. 27). According to him, there was a disturbing trend in universities for researchers to be encouraged, almost expected, to generate patents and from there, even to be involved in initiating “start up” companies. Other researchers responded. Glen Prestwich and Charles Wight (Bard et al., 2010) argue that if researchers were able to present a clear connection between “taxpayer dollars” and funded research, the public would realize the value that science delivers. Prestwich and Wight argue further that a new cadre of researchers is involved in identifying real world problems, translating basic research into applications, and creating products as well as publications. Moving from basic research to applications that address real world problems is called translational research, and Prestwich and Wight see this research as a positive development in chemistry. Adam Heller (Bard et al., 2010) weighs in claiming that the pursuit of “patent-protected, people-serving products” was not “a sad sign of our times but a reawakening of the proud history of academic chemistry and chemical engineering” (p. 29). I find it interesting that one of Heller’s choices for historical examples of chemists that had transcended academic chemistry and chemical engineering was Fritz Haber. For me Haber is a challenging figure in chemistry research because although he won the 1918 Nobel Prize in Chemistry “for the synthesis of ammonia from its elements” (The Nobel Foundation, 2010), which allowed the Earth to support many more humans than before, he also played a significant role in the German development of poison gas during World War I. Heller’s reference to Haber raised the issue of the role of ethics in research. Comments by Prestwick and Wight also led me to reflect on reports of how Marie and Pierre Curie conducted research and disseminated their findings in the identification of two new elements, polonium and radium, and their exploration of the phenomenon Marie Curie called radioactivity. Historian of science, Helena Pycior (1993) notes that Marie Curie made sure readers were made M.-H. Chiu, P. J. Gilmer, and D. F. Treagust (Eds.), Celebrating the 100th Anniversary of Madame Marie Sklodowska Curie’s Nobel Prize in Chemistry. 87–102. © 2011 Sense Publishers. All rights reserved. CATHERINE MILNE aware of the fact that Marie proposed this term in her biography of Pierre Curie (Curie, 1923). Unlike Haber, whose role in developing chemical weapons in World War I makes him in some respects a more challenging scientific figure to endorse wholeheartedly, Marie Curie has no such problems. In her own writing and that of her biographers, Curie is presented as espousing very clearly ideas about the nature of scientific endeavor that take on an almost fantastical quality in our cybermodern era, but values that were heartfelt, and consistent with the modernist era in which she lived and worked. As I hope to show in this chapter, Marie Curie was no shrinking violet when it came to supporting and endorsing industry, especially if it allowed her to further develop and maintain the field of radioactivity, and her approach was entirely consistent with ethical theories that are part of modernist philosophy. Both these contemporary examples and Marie Curie’s history as a researcher raise for me questions of what role ethics play in scientific research, whether success in science is really only about patenting a new process or product, and the possible role of existing ideologies in the way researchers frame ethics associated with the practice and outcomes of their research. In the following sections I will try to explore these questions. SO WHAT ARE ETHICS? Applied ethics is an attempt to “apply moral principles to a concrete world of practice” (May, 1980, p. 358). Marie Curie is a good case study to examine research and ethics even though her writings and those of her biographers sometimes do not let us see behind the heroic façade. In this chapter, I seek to explore Curie’s evolving ethical stance in the scientific enterprise, in particular her desire to ensure the longevity of research associated with the chemistry, physics, and biomedical applications of radium. Her research provides a context for considering the nature and role of ethics in scientific and chemical research. From a universal perspective, research ethics can be thought of as a set of principles about how researchers should conduct themselves when they are engaged in research (Shrader-Frechette, 1994). Historically, these consisted of philosophical recommendations that became accepted as “communal codes of behavior” (p. 2). For example, philosopher Francis Bacon (1620/1968) when proposing a new sense-based philosophy for generating new knowledge via experiment recommended the use of witnesses that could verify the observations or ‘matters of fact’ claimed by an experimental philosopher like Robert Boyle. In her book, Ethics of Scientific Research, Kristin Shrader-Frechette (1994) notes historic interest in what should constitute the norms of experimental research; however, calls for a code of ethics typically are associated with the professionalization of various science disciplines, suggesting that codes constitute agreed communal practices to which individual members are expected to conform. Today much research is conducted in universities or industries rather than private laboratories in people’s homes or in laboratories maintained by professional organizations, such as the Royal Society of London. University research generates 88 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • George De Hevesy in America
    Journal of Nuclear Medicine, published on July 13, 2019 as doi:10.2967/jnumed.119.233254 George de Hevesy in America George de Hevesy was a Hungarian radiochemist who was awarded the Nobel Prize in Chemistry in 1943 for the discovery of the radiotracer principle (1). As the radiotracer principle is the foundation of all diagnostic and therapeutic nuclear medicine procedures, Hevesy is widely considered the father of nuclear medicine (1). Although it is well-known that he spent time at a number of European institutions, it is not widely known that he also spent six weeks at Cornell University in Ithaca, NY, in the fall of 1930 as that year’s Baker Lecturer in the Department of Chemistry (2-6). “[T]he Baker Lecturer gave two formal presentations per week, to a large and diverse audience and provided an informal seminar weekly for students and faculty members interested in the subject. The lecturer had an office in Baker Laboratory and was available to faculty and students for further discussion.” (7) There is also evidence that, “…Hevesy visited Harvard [University, Cambridge, MA] as a Baker Lecturer at Cornell in 1930…” (8). Neither of the authors of this Note/Letter was aware of Hevesy’s association with Cornell University despite our longstanding ties to Cornell until one of us (WCK) noticed the association in Hevesy’s biographical page on the official Nobel website (6). WCK obtained both his undergraduate degree and medical degree from Cornell in Ithaca and New York City, respectively, and spent his career in nuclear medicine. JRO did his nuclear medicine training at Columbia University and has subsequently been a faculty member of Weill Cornell Medical College for the last eleven years (with a brief tenure at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (affiliated with Cornell)), and is now the program director of the Nuclear Medicine residency and Chief of the Molecular Imaging and Therapeutics Section.
    [Show full text]
  • Enriching the Earth: Fritz Haber, Carl Bosch, and the Transformation of World Food Production. by Vaclav Smil. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2004
    Book Reviews / 383 nessing water power to produce scythes for farmers, spindles for textile mills, and cotton thread. Small emphasizes that these were not the activities of ab- sentee investors but of local men and women who mixed manufacturing with agriculture. Beauty and Convenience focuses on a farming community that has received scant attention from historians, but Small makes a convincing case that the way in which the farmers of Sutton fashioned and re-fashioned their houses and landscape reveals their full participation in the historic transformations of their era. Kenneth Hafertepe Baylor University Enriching the Earth: Fritz Haber, Carl Bosch, and the Transformation of World Food Production. By Vaclav Smil. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2004. 360 pp., $19.95, paperback, ISBN 0-262-69313-5. What is the most important technological invention in the twentieth century? Vaclav Smil makes the cogent argument that it is the discovery and industrial- ization of ammonia synthesis by Fritz Haber and Carl Bosch. Without indus- trial N-fixation, as much as two-fifths of the world’s population would starve for want of available protein in their diet, and major advances in high-pressure industrial processes would have been delayed. Likewise, the Haber-Bosch process facilitated world munitions production; encouraged agricultural ex- pansion onto marginal lands, leading to greater greenhouse emissions and soil degradation; and (because of inherent inefficiencies in nitrogen recovery by plants) has led to an unbalanced enrichment of natural ecosystems by nitrogen. It is an odd book given the title. History and society would be unalterably different without Haber and Bosch, but these protagonists do not appear un- til chapters four and five, respectively; then their lives are described in the most perfunctory manner.
    [Show full text]
  • Opening Ceremony, 19 September 2010 Christian Colliex, IFSM
    Opening Ceremony, 19 September 2010 Christian Colliex, IFSM President PartipantesPartipantes dodo IMCIMC 17,17, sejamsejam todostodos BemBem VindosVindos aoao RioRio DeDe JaneiroJaneiro IFSM International Federation of Societies for Microscopy Words about the Federation Life from 2006 to 2010 From IMC 16 in Sapporo to IMC 17 in Rio, and next? Prag ? Beijing? Istanbul ? Sapporo 2006 Rio 2010 Sydney ? General Assembly of IFSM selects Rio de Janeiro as host city for IMC 17 in 2010 Sapporo, closing ceremony GS and CC Sapporo 2006 IFSM presidents and executive board members Left to right : First row E. Zeitler, A. Maunsbach, G. Thomas,H. Hashimoto, A. Howie Second row : S. Iijima, G. Solorzano, B. Carter, G. Griffin, X, H. Lichte, D. Cockayne, P. Ingram, C. Colliex, W. Baumeister, K. Furuya. Selection and visit of the site (October 2006) Rehearsal, September 2009 From an IFSM summit meeting at Cusco (2007) preparing IMC 17… …to the official opening of IMC 17 to night at Rio de Janeiro 19 September 2010 Thanks and congratulations to the organizing committee Organizing Committee Chair Guillermo Solorzano Vice Chairs Wanderley de Souza (Life Science) Walter J. Botta (Materials Science) Daniel Ugarte (Instrumentation) Chair Local organizing committee Luiz Henrique de Almeida (UFRJ) Marcia Attias (UFRJ) Helene Barbosa (Fiocruz) Claudia Franca Barros (JBRJ) Ivani Bott (PUC‐Rio) Marilia Garcia Diniz (UERJ) Secretary Marcos Farina (UFRJ) Andréa Martiny (Inmetro) Rossana Melo (UFJF), secretary Vice Chairs André Luiz Pinto (CBPF) Elisa Saitovitch (CBPF)
    [Show full text]
  • One Hundred Years of Chemical Warfare: Research
    Bretislav Friedrich · Dieter Hoffmann Jürgen Renn · Florian Schmaltz · Martin Wolf Editors One Hundred Years of Chemical Warfare: Research, Deployment, Consequences One Hundred Years of Chemical Warfare: Research, Deployment, Consequences Bretislav Friedrich • Dieter Hoffmann Jürgen Renn • Florian Schmaltz Martin Wolf Editors One Hundred Years of Chemical Warfare: Research, Deployment, Consequences Editors Bretislav Friedrich Florian Schmaltz Fritz Haber Institute of the Max Planck Max Planck Institute for the History of Society Science Berlin Berlin Germany Germany Dieter Hoffmann Martin Wolf Max Planck Institute for the History of Fritz Haber Institute of the Max Planck Science Society Berlin Berlin Germany Germany Jürgen Renn Max Planck Institute for the History of Science Berlin Germany ISBN 978-3-319-51663-9 ISBN 978-3-319-51664-6 (eBook) DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-51664-6 Library of Congress Control Number: 2017941064 © The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2017. This book is an open access publication. Open Access This book is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 2.5 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/), which permits any noncom- mercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this book are included in the book's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the book's Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.
    [Show full text]
  • Scientists and War 1916-2016 by Dave Webb Leeds Beckett University and Scientists for Global Responsibility
    Scientists and War 1916-2016 By Dave Webb Leeds Beckett University and Scientists for Global Responsibility The quest for understanding and to know how things work – to find out why they are, what they are - has always been a major driving force for scientists. There are, however, other more negative external drivers – such as the pursuit for military superiority, even in times of peace. Science and engineering have unfortunately made killing easier by helping to develop new types of weapons and World War 1 saw more than its fair share of those. The war also saw a mixture of attitudes from scientists and engineers. Many thought it their duty to help develop new weapons technologies. But there were also those who would not participate in the killing. To understand the social pressures on scientists who spoke out against the war, we need to recognise the cultural context at that time. Just before World War 2 an article in Time magazine dated 11 September 1939, entitled Science and War, expressed the opinion that scientists were not to blame for the way in which their discoveries were used by “men of bad will” and misapplied to “the conquest and murder of men”. This also seemed to be the attitude of many scientists in 1914, and perhaps remains so today. Some though were directly involved. At the outbreak of the First World War, men with specialist scientific and technological skills were not prevented from serving at the Front – by Germany or the Allies. Although some were placed into departments of Time Magazine Front Cover, the armed forces where their skills could be used – for example September 11, 1939 Physicists Ernest Rutherford (Professor of Physics at Manchester since 1907 and winner of the 1908 Nobel Prize in Chemistry) and William Henry Bragg (holder of the Cavendish chair of physics at Leeds since 1909) went to carry out anti-submarine work for the Admiralty.
    [Show full text]
  • Antoine Laurent Lavoisier (1743-1794)
    Lavoisier and I I, , studied chemistry under OLIVER K. MANUEL (1936- ), Professor of Chemistry at the University of Missouri- Rolla, who showed that the solar system inherited its chemical gradients from poorly-mixed debris of a supernova (SN) that exploded here 5 Gy ago and that the Sun sorts atoms by mass and derives its energy from repulsion between neutrons in the collapsed SN core on which it formed, who studied chemistry under PAUL KAZUO KURODA (1917-2001), Professor of Chemistry at the University of Arkansas who predicted the occurrence of self-sustaining chain reactors in natural uranium minerals and predicted and then discovered the fission products of extinct Plutonium-244 and who studied chemistry under KENJIRO KIMURA (1896-1988), Professor of Chemistry at the Tokyo Imperial University, who discovered uranium-237 and the symmetric mode of fission prior to WWII, and who studied chemistry under GEORGE DE HEVESY (1885-1966), Professor of Chemistry at the University of Freiburg, who discovered element 72 Hafnium and received the Nobel Prize in Chemistry in 1943 for his work on the use of isotopes as tracers in the study of chemical processes, and who studied chemistry under FRITZ HABER (1868-1934), Professor of Chemistry at the University of Berlin, who received the Nobel Prize in Chemistry in 1918 for the synthesis of ammonia from its elements, and who studied chemistry under CARL THEODOR LIEBERMANN (1842-1914), Professor of Chemistry at the Technical School of Charlottenberg, who synthesized alizarin in 1868, and who studied
    [Show full text]
  • Angewandte Chemie 2001
    ESSAYS Coping with Fritz Haber×s Somber Literary Shadow** Roald Hoffmann* and Pierre Laszlo* Chemists are legitimately distressed by the chemophobia of Sir Hiram Maxim (the inventor of the machine gun and of an the public. One of its manifestations (hardly the only one) is anti-poison gas inhaler), his brother Hudson Maxim (of the stereotyped presentation of a chemist as an amoral Maximite TNT charge fame), Justus von Liebig (one of the character, having sold his soul to the Devil. The implicit sin is icons of our profession, entering the play as the pioneering more than Faustian, for the betrayal is not only personal, but agricultural chemist), and Sir William Crookes (who foresaw that of humanity. Fritz Haber is often this scapegoat. the need for nitrogen fixation). Is this stereotyping deserved? And might we, collectively Tony Harrison has done his homework well, his documen- and individually, do something about it? We approach the tation is unimpeachable. Fritz Haber×s way to gas warfare is issue here by way of an attentive reading of a selection[1] of the perceptively evoked, making Haber say: literary pieces featuring Haber, whether under his own name or in transparent disguise, and of recent biographies of Haber. ™Out of the industry which gives the world its dyes I can chemically concoct a new shock from the skies. (...) I×m off to devise a little surprise The Fictional Haber something that×s certain to stun all those who thought that war×s only fought 1 with things like that vulgar gun. (...) The British poet and occasional playwright Tony Harrison My gas will break the deadlock, make the war much shorter has written a genuinely funny mu- and therefore save millions from the slaughter.∫ sical play, Square Rounds, in which Fritz Haber has a most prominent Harrison has his characters speak in rhymed verse, a nice role.[2] First performed at the Oliv- touch: Haber indeed versified as a hobby–Stoltzenberg×s ier Theatre in London in 1992, the biography[8] has some choice examples.
    [Show full text]
  • Book Reviews
    ll t Ch (1999 9 BOOK REVIEWS A History of Chemistry. rndtt nd-nnt f htr" thr dn prnpl fr th nrr- nd Ibll Stnr trnltd b brh vn tv h ntrl tn "Wht htr?" ld rvrd Unvrt r Cbrd MA 199 35 th t p ddtnl tn pp Ornll pblhd Histoire de la chemie, Ed- tn évrt 1993 Wht f ntd f dn t th hddn pt f ll-dfnd n h dntt nt n tn r th 19 t th rl 199 nn ntn nv th n th prdt f htr? rnt htr f htr hd ntll t h Wht f ntd f n tht htr h htr Arn Ihd n-vl trtnt r th lt-vl- hh n n h t td r nr prp r b rtntn th r ntndd t b tht t htr n prr? prhnv rv bth rnzd ln th ln f hrnll nrrtv nd bth rttn b h- Ardn t th thr htr bd n th t Sn 199 hvr thr h bn n br- nr t th tn "ld l rbl th tr- rnt f rh th th pprn f dzn n- phl rh f n tht r f tlf thn ln hn f vnt hpn n tht hntd rl nd plzd htr f htr b tn f t ntr" t dpt thr l In th brnn lt A History of Chemistry f- tht th "pl f htr n th hrrh f th - fr thn fndntll dffrnt; t n ltrn- n l ttr f dbt" nd tht h- tv ll drt hlln t trdtnl ht- tr h bn ntnll bld t rntt t rl- r f htr Wrttn b prfnl htrn f tnhp th th thr n nd-nnt nd n (nd-nnt nd prfnl phl- Stnr d nt h htr t b n n th r- phr f n (Stnr th txt prvd ntr- rd vrthl rn fr th ptn tht pnt t th ntn f l nrrtv f htr "thr n trnl n f htr n trnn- Cntn f fv ndvdl "npht" f htr dnt bjt tht nvld vr th r f th nt- t ffr n fntn vntt rttn n ld r" th thr fr thlv t l fr "htr rdbl tl— trbt t bth th ll f th trn- v dntt" vr ln lbl htr h ltr nd th rnl rnh txt prdd b th - th rnz nt th fv hptr h f hh "pr- thr nt dffrnt f f htr [nd] dlnt t dntt t vn t" nd-nnt nd Stnr pprh thr b- jt
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2017
    67th Lindau Nobel Laureate Meeting 6th Lindau Meeting on Economic Sciences Annual Report 2017 The Lindau Nobel Laureate Meetings Contents »67 th Lindau Nobel Laureate Meeting (Chemistry) »6th Lindau Meeting on Economic Sciences Over the last 67 years, more than 450 Nobel Laureates have come 67th Lindau Nobel Laureate Meeting (Chemistry) Science as an Insurance Policy Against the Risks of Climate Change 10 The Interdependence of Research and Policymaking 82 to Lindau to meet the next generation of leading scientists. 25–30 June 2017 Keynote by Nobel Laureate Steven Chu Keynote by ECB President Mario Draghi The laureates shape the scientific programme with their topical #LiNo17 preferences. In various session types, they teach and discuss Opening Ceremony 14 Opening Ceremony 86 scientific and societal issues and provide invaluable feedback Scientific Chairpersons to the participating young scientists. – Astrid Gräslund, Professor of Biophysics, Department of New Friends Across Borders 16 An Inspiring Hothouse of Intergenerational 88 Biochemistry and Biophysics, Stockholm University, Sweden By Scientific Chairpersons Astrid Gräslund and Wolfgang Lubitz and Cross-Cultural Exchange Outstanding scientists and economists up to the age of 35 are – Wolfgang Lubitz, Director, Max Planck Institute By Scientific Chairpersons Torsten Persson and Klaus Schmidt invited to take part in the Lindau Meetings. The participants for Chemical Energy Conversion, Germany Nobel Laureates 18 include undergraduates, PhD students as well as post-doctoral Laureates 90 researchers. In order to participate in a meeting, they have to Nominating Institutions 22 pass a multi-step application and selection process. 6th Lindau Meeting on Economic Sciences Nominating Institutions 93 22–26 August 2017 Young Scientists 23 #LiNoEcon Young Economists 103 Scientific Chairpersons SCIENTIFIC PROGRAMME – Martin F.
    [Show full text]
  • James, Steinhauser, Hoffmann, Friedrich One Hundred Years at The
    James, Steinhauser, Hoffmann, Friedrich One Hundred Years at the Intersection of Chemistry and Physics Published under the auspices of the Board of Directors of the Fritz Haber Institute of the Max Planck Society: Hans-Joachim Freund Gerard Meijer Matthias Scheffler Robert Schlögl Martin Wolf Jeremiah James · Thomas Steinhauser · Dieter Hoffmann · Bretislav Friedrich One Hundred Years at the Intersection of Chemistry and Physics The Fritz Haber Institute of the Max Planck Society 1911–2011 De Gruyter An electronic version of this book is freely available, thanks to the support of libra- ries working with Knowledge Unlatched. KU is a collaborative initiative designed to make high quality books Open Access. More information about the initiative can be found at www.knowledgeunlatched.org Aut ho rs: Dr. Jeremiah James Prof. Dr. Dieter Hoffmann Fritz Haber Institute of the Max Planck Institute for the Max Planck Society History of Science Faradayweg 4–6 Boltzmannstr. 22 14195 Berlin 14195 Berlin [email protected] [email protected] Dr. Thomas Steinhauser Prof. Dr. Bretislav Friedrich Fritz Haber Institute of the Fritz Haber Institute of the Max Planck Society Max Planck Society Faradayweg 4–6 Faradayweg 4–6 14195 Berlin 14195 Berlin [email protected] [email protected] Cover images: Front cover: Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Physical Chemistry and Electrochemistry, 1913. From left to right, “factory” building, main building, director’s villa, known today as Haber Villa. Back cover: Campus of the Fritz Haber Institute of the Max Planck Society, 2011. The Institute’s his- toric buildings, contiguous with the “Röntgenbau” on their right, house the Departments of Physical Chemistry and Molecular Physics.
    [Show full text]
  • A Forum for Electrochemistry and Solid-State Science for 100 Years
    A Forum for Electrochemistry and Solid-State Science for 100 Years he Electrochemical Society (ECS) has a birthplace of historic distinction – Philadelphia – the home of Beginnings... BENJAMIN FRANKLIN (and his famous kite) and the birthplace of the United States. The Society originally was called the American Electrochemical Society, but, The Society’s roots can be traced farther back in time than like the nation, it had its roots in distant lands. ECS when our story begins. Relics found in the Middle East sug- Twas like the nation in other respects. It was a melting pot; in gest that, thousands of years ago, voltaic cells were being this case, a melting pot of scientific and technological disci- used. Electroplating of some sort is known to have existed in plines, and of their adherents, who came from countries from those times as well. Australia to Mexico to Russia and points in between. The following photo essay is a distillation of the Society’s 1800—ALESSANDRO VOLTA concluded that a “pile” of dissimi- history – the usual dates, names, and significant markers, but lar metals provided the electricity responsible for the twitch- also some amusing anecdotes and intriguing photographs. ing of frogs’ legs reported by Galvani. We hope you will enjoy this quick look at a society that has made its mark on the world of electrochemistry and solid- 1815—HUMPHRY DAVY used a group of these “piles” to dis- state science and technology. cover and isolate the elements potassium, sodium, and calci- um. Davy also coined the term “electrochemical.” FARADAY HALL HEROULT EDISON DOW 22 The Electrochemical Society Interface • Spring 2002 REED RICHARDS 1831—MICHAEL FARADAY was led to formulate the laws of elec- trolysis and was the first to use the terms anode, cathode, Founding..
    [Show full text]
  • Actinide Research Quarterly
    Targeted Radiation Therapy Seaborg postdocs developing actinide isotopes for cancer treatments Actinide Research Quarterly Preface In this quarter we continue from the previous issue and present research from another seven recent Seaborg postdoctoral fellows, many of whom have continued their work at Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) as scientists. Tis issue focuses on the chemistry of actinide elements relevant to a wide range of challenges, in particular: the separation of nuclear waste, the application of radionuclides in cancer treatments, and the aging of plutonium in the nation’s stockpile. One of the great challenges in actinide chemistry is understanding and predicting bonding in actinide molecules, which could pave the way for developing nuclear waste separation systems. Su (p11) has tackled these problems using advanced computational techniques to understand the nature of chemical bonding in Am3+ and Eu3+ salts, supported by experimental data, providing direct evidence for the frst time to explain behavior originally observed by our institute’s namesake Seaborg and his co-workers over 60 years ago. Te synthesis of the frst Np imido complex—an analog of the well-known neptunyl ion—is described by Brown (p17), a milestone achievement that also opens doors for theoretical studies which can improve our understanding of actinide bonding. Te coordination and catalytic chemistry of T and U has been explored by Browne (p23) and Erickson (p27), who used similar organo- metallic platforms to investigate high-nitrogen content molecules as nuclear fuel precursors and hydrogen-generating catalytic cycles, respectively. Te surface of metallic Pu is highly reactive and dynamic, which creates problems when trying to predict how the material will behave, especially in long-term storage (e.g., in the nation’s stockpile).
    [Show full text]