Book Reviews

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Book Reviews ll t Ch (1999 9 BOOK REVIEWS A History of Chemistry. rndtt nd-nnt f htr" thr dn prnpl fr th nrr- nd Ibll Stnr trnltd b brh vn tv h ntrl tn "Wht htr?" ld rvrd Unvrt r Cbrd MA 199 35 th t p ddtnl tn pp Ornll pblhd Histoire de la chemie, Ed- tn évrt 1993 Wht f ntd f dn t th hddn pt f ll-dfnd n h dntt nt n tn r th 19 t th rl 199 nn ntn nv th n th prdt f htr? rnt htr f htr hd ntll t h Wht f ntd f n tht htr h htr Arn Ihd n-vl trtnt r th lt-vl- hh n n h t td r nr prp r b rtntn th r ntndd t b tht t htr n prr? prhnv rv bth rnzd ln th ln f hrnll nrrtv nd bth rttn b h- Ardn t th thr htr bd n th t Sn 199 hvr thr h bn n br- nr t th tn "ld l rbl th tr- rnt f rh th th pprn f dzn n- phl rh f n tht r f tlf thn ln hn f vnt hpn n tht hntd rl nd plzd htr f htr b tn f t ntr" t dpt thr l In th brnn lt A History of Chemistry f- tht th "pl f htr n th hrrh f th - fr thn fndntll dffrnt; t n ltrn- n l ttr f dbt" nd tht h- tv ll drt hlln t trdtnl ht- tr h bn ntnll bld t rntt t rl- r f htr Wrttn b prfnl htrn f tnhp th th thr n nd-nnt nd n (nd-nnt nd prfnl phl- Stnr d nt h htr t b n n th r- phr f n (Stnr th txt prvd ntr- rd vrthl rn fr th ptn tht pnt t th ntn f l nrrtv f htr "thr n trnl n f htr n trnn- Cntn f fv ndvdl "npht" f htr dnt bjt tht nvld vr th r f th nt- t ffr n fntn vntt rttn n ld r" th thr fr thlv t l fr "htr rdbl tl— trbt t bth th ll f th trn- v dntt" vr ln lbl htr h ltr nd th rnl rnh txt prdd b th - th rnz nt th fv hptr h f hh "pr- thr nt dffrnt f f htr [nd] dlnt t dntt t vn t" nd-nnt nd Stnr pprh thr b- jt n th b f ptn tht n ht h frt f th fv npht prvd lp nt hld Unl th ht h htr ftn t f htr rn n lh nd n th rvd "nft fr thr n [nd] drbd 17th-ntr rvvl f rtn Annt Gr d bt htr tht r f t dntt—nd f t - ttr h nd nd thrd hptr r rv f ll" th thr r nt t ll r f tht 1th- nd 19th-ntr htr rptvl In Chp- dntt In ft th dpt th "t fr th dntt tr th thr ndr thrh vrl r f n- 7 ll t Ch (1999 dtr td th htr nd n th fnl hp- p th dvt ltr n th hptr t rj- tr th ffr pl f htr fr th th n- tn n 13 f Avdr hpth nd f t tr hr l hrt pl In ll th hp- thr n nrl tr th thr "pnt brd htrl ptr" fr Chptr 5 "brn rrtr" rtrn t hh th r "t pbl t ndrtnd ll th th ntt tll nfnt lt th bn- ndtrl nd ntlltl dvntr tht t vr p- nn f th th ntr rd hv hpd htr v dntt " W blv tht th hrtn f th pprh t- In 191 n plt n nrn htr tll h t dvnt thht tht th t nd llr hpth nl ftn nd rtzd th th nbrvbl In th pnn hptr "Orn" nd- ntt r prntd f th rll xtd nnt nd Stnr fnd d n Gr thht fr hl t Arttl But if the atom provoked skepticism from inor- ganic chemists, it was the target of much more radi- that obsessed and still obsess chemistry—principles, cal questioning from two renowned physical chem- elements, atoms, the problem of differentiation, the ists, Pierre Duhem and Wilhelm Ostwald. relationship between the one and the many, genera- tion interpreted as an ephemeral transgression of a A ttd ptvt th "t rnnd ph- static order or as a result of perpetual conflict. l ht" hrdl rprnt ntr v n trn- A lt f d tht hv nfd hl thnn fr f-th-ntr htr h prfr f th- r thn r t thr lnvt vn f rtl ph rjtd th ntf vldt f n nd th d nt rprnt ntn trdtn It tr f dl f ttr; nd Otld n f th lt h- tht ltn t r nt dntl t th f t t pp t thr hd rtrtd fr nt rt nd pp bt th h f th tr nrt tht h d t dn th xtn f t- "t" n th rl 1 nt rbtrr tr nl ndrtd b thr ntt t tht t It rtnl tr tht n ht thrht h pnn hptr l vr th ln fr l- th 19th ntr r ptl f th ltnn t h t htr t th thr "fnd th d- nd rnh ntt r n th t vr rptn f prdr tht rt prtl nt- nttt t vn th h dbtd th phl nt btn lh nd htr" th l fnd xtn f t ll fnd th npt fl n thrtl ntnt lrl n th b f rl xplnn hl phnn nd n ht dd h trd "th bt nn f th xtnth-ntr nt rrd t nl "ftn h prtnn t ht" h thr t thr trntnl fr— rlt b dfntn tprr nd rltv t thr vn lnt Glbr nd hr— prtpnt n blt t rnz th ft" In th n thr n- n "ndv trl btn rvl dtrn" th tn nd-nnt nd Stnr d nt d j- t f hh nt t ll lr t th t t t t vr pltd tr th thr d nt t lr thr h tht trl prdd r ht vnt nd dtrnd t t- h thr n thr l tht ll fr come. rtr dn thn th prvd—htr th "dhtr f pltv lh" (p 9; htr rd tr r l prblt n th thrd hp- n lttl r thn " rv n brdntd tr "A Sn f rfr" nd-nnt nd t ph nd n th rv f bl nd ndtr" Stnr drb r "th ntr f Erpn h- pprntl th n dntt f t n (p 53; nd "t- tr" n 1 bt th v lttl ndtn tht th d prt ppr t b th prrtv f ph" ntr vr vd drn th 19th ntr h hp- rthr thn htr (p 5 tr prnt n ntrtn vrv prrl f rnh htr thh Klé Mndlv nd rd d In ddtn t ttnt tht r pn t dbt flt r f f t p h rl f r- th b ntn ttnt tht r tn n ft- d tpl ntrbtn t ltrhtr r lt "pl nrtd ltrt dn jr ltd hl ntrprttn f th bttr th n- d" (p 1; nd "Wlltn prfrrd t dtr- trdtn f th tr "nd" nd "thd" nd th n ll th vlnt ht n rltnhp t th l f ltrl h thr th t rd b nt O = 1" (p 117 hr r l ttnt ltrhtr n lttl vr hlf p l thn th h nn nt rdl pprnt t —"t l- l t rrt htr" (p 31; hl - ll t Ch (1999 71 br "th tt n hh th rt nd ffnt r All tld th r nt lt tht rnd A ltnl zr [nd] n lnr prvld tt tr f Chtr txt fr ndrrdt r bt nl th tt t hh rrvrbl pr ld" n th htr f n r fr " dr nnprfnl (p 9; nd "f th tvt n htr b r pbl" n blrb n th dt jt t h btrt t l tnd t p brdntn t ph- txt r phlphll plx bt th l l" (p 1 ntr f htrrph th thdl nd th nd nd b f ht ll th f h ptprr f tp n Chptr 5 d nt pr- htrn h rt htr f htr h r vd rprnttv ptr f th-ntr htr nt fr th npht r th nrlt Intd th thr lt tp tht tnd t b lld th ph nd th pprt thr v tht "h- nd-nnt nd Stnr lrl ntnd thr tr t b nd f ppld ph" (p 5 htr f htr t b prvtv nd t bt t r xpl th nld dn f th r t pprprt fr rdr h r lrd flr f Il rn n nntn th nnlbr th th bjt h ndvdl n rtnl prft t nd dptv trtr hh r n pr- fr th prtlr htr hthr th r ptht tnt bt nr pt f ntprr htr - t ptdrnt rdn f htr r nt h b thr th nrl lt f rfrn nr ftnt t n r fndntl nd dtn tn hh pbltn f rn nt vn Ordr Ot f Ch hlln ht th htrl bnt t r-xn (19 hh h -thrd th Ibll Stnr thr v nd tttd bt th htr f thr n hr r thr n nd nr rrr n th n Chtr hldnt vr b th h rfrn ll rd E.
Recommended publications
  • George De Hevesy in America
    Journal of Nuclear Medicine, published on July 13, 2019 as doi:10.2967/jnumed.119.233254 George de Hevesy in America George de Hevesy was a Hungarian radiochemist who was awarded the Nobel Prize in Chemistry in 1943 for the discovery of the radiotracer principle (1). As the radiotracer principle is the foundation of all diagnostic and therapeutic nuclear medicine procedures, Hevesy is widely considered the father of nuclear medicine (1). Although it is well-known that he spent time at a number of European institutions, it is not widely known that he also spent six weeks at Cornell University in Ithaca, NY, in the fall of 1930 as that year’s Baker Lecturer in the Department of Chemistry (2-6). “[T]he Baker Lecturer gave two formal presentations per week, to a large and diverse audience and provided an informal seminar weekly for students and faculty members interested in the subject. The lecturer had an office in Baker Laboratory and was available to faculty and students for further discussion.” (7) There is also evidence that, “…Hevesy visited Harvard [University, Cambridge, MA] as a Baker Lecturer at Cornell in 1930…” (8). Neither of the authors of this Note/Letter was aware of Hevesy’s association with Cornell University despite our longstanding ties to Cornell until one of us (WCK) noticed the association in Hevesy’s biographical page on the official Nobel website (6). WCK obtained both his undergraduate degree and medical degree from Cornell in Ithaca and New York City, respectively, and spent his career in nuclear medicine. JRO did his nuclear medicine training at Columbia University and has subsequently been a faculty member of Weill Cornell Medical College for the last eleven years (with a brief tenure at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (affiliated with Cornell)), and is now the program director of the Nuclear Medicine residency and Chief of the Molecular Imaging and Therapeutics Section.
    [Show full text]
  • Yugoslavia Chemical Chronology
    Yugoslavia Chemical Chronology 2008-2001 | 1999-1996 | 1995-1990 | 1989-1970 | 1969-1918 Last update: May 2010 As of May 2010, this chronology is no longer being updated. For current developments, please see the Yugoslavia Chemical Overview. This annotated chronology is based on the data sources that follow each entry. Public sources often provide conflicting information on classified military programs. In some cases we are unable to resolve these discrepancies, in others we have deliberately refrained from doing so to highlight the potential influence of false or misleading information as it appeared over time. In many cases, we are unable to independently verify claims. Hence in reviewing this chronology, readers should take into account the credibility of the sources employed here. Inclusion in this chronology does not necessarily indicate that a particular development is of direct or indirect proliferation significance. Some entries provide international or domestic context for technological development and national policymaking. Moreover, some entries may refer to developments with positive consequences for nonproliferation 2008-2001 24 July 2008 The Serbian government submits a draft law on the implementation of the CWC to Parliament for consideration. This law will update an earlier law adopted in 2005. —"Update on National Implementation as at 14 November 2008," Chemical Disarmament Quarterly, Vol. 6 No. 4 (December 2008), p. 19. 6 June 2008 The process of down-sizing and reorganizing the 246th NBC Defense Brigade of the Serbian army is completed. The unit which has been reduced to a single battalion is now based at the Tzar Lazar barracks in Krusevac. The reduction in the unit's size, in the 1980s the unit was a full regiment, reflects the lower priority of NBC defense in the post-Cold War environment.
    [Show full text]
  • The Epistemology Under Locke's Corpuscularianism
    THE EPISTEMOLOGY UNDER LOCKE’S CORPUSCULARIANISM Michael Jacovides 1. MACHINES AS MODELS OF INTELLIGIBILITY The intelligibility of our artifacts suggests to many seventeenth century thinkers that nature works along analogous lines, that the same principles that explain the operations of artifacts explain the operations of natural bodies.1 We may call this belief ‘corpuscularianism’ when conjoined with the premise that the details of the analogy depend upon the sub-microscopic textures of ordinary bodies and upon the rapidly moving, imperceptibly tiny corpuscles that surround these bodies.2 Locke’s sympathy for corpuscularianism comes out clearly where he describes the implications of our inability to perceive the sub-microscopic world. If we could, he conjectures, various perplexities would be unknotted. We would solve mysteries of pharmacology, since did we know the Mechanical affections of the Particles of Rhubarb, Hemlock, Opium, and a Man, as a Watchmaker does those of a Watch, whereby it performs its Opera- tions, and of a File which by rubbing on them will alter the Figure of any of the Wheels, we should be able to tell before Hand, that Rhubarb will purge, Hemlock kill, and Opium make a man sleep; as well as a Watch-maker can, that a little piece of Pa- per, laid on the Balance, will keep the Watch from going, till it be removed; or that some small part of it, being rubb’d by a file, the Machin would quite lose its Motion, and the Watch go no more3 (4.3.25). Locke borrows the expression ‘mechanical affections’ from Robert Boyle, who uses it to denote mo- tion, size, figure, and arrangement of parts “because to them men willingly refer the various opera- tions of mechanical engines”4.
    [Show full text]
  • 4. Marie Curie, Ethics and Research
    CATHERINE MILNE 4. MARIE CURIE, ETHICS AND RESEARCH INTRODUCTION Recently Chemistry and Engineering News (Bard, Prestwich, Wight, Heller, & Zimmerman, 2010) carried a series of commentaries on the culture of academic research in chemistry with a focus on the role of funding in research. Initially, Alan Bard decried how decisions about tenure seem more and more to focus on grant getting rather than consideration of the applicant’s accomplishments generated because of access to this funding. Bard argued further that often this funding was based, not on the quality of the proposed research but on a researcher’s ability to “hype their research” and damming truth in the process (Bard et al., 2010, p. 27). According to him, there was a disturbing trend in universities for researchers to be encouraged, almost expected, to generate patents and from there, even to be involved in initiating “start up” companies. Other researchers responded. Glen Prestwich and Charles Wight (Bard et al., 2010) argue that if researchers were able to present a clear connection between “taxpayer dollars” and funded research, the public would realize the value that science delivers. Prestwich and Wight argue further that a new cadre of researchers is involved in identifying real world problems, translating basic research into applications, and creating products as well as publications. Moving from basic research to applications that address real world problems is called translational research, and Prestwich and Wight see this research as a positive development in chemistry. Adam Heller (Bard et al., 2010) weighs in claiming that the pursuit of “patent-protected, people-serving products” was not “a sad sign of our times but a reawakening of the proud history of academic chemistry and chemical engineering” (p.
    [Show full text]
  • Styles of Experimental Reasoning in Early Modern Chemistry
    Styles of Experimental Reasoning in Early Modern Chemistry By Victor Dan Boantza A thesis submitted in conformity with requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Institute for the History and Philosophy of Science and Technology University of Toronto © Copyright by Victor Dan Boantza 2009 Styles of Experimental Reasoning in Early Modern Chemistry Victor Dan Boantza Doctor of Philosophy Institute for the History and Philosophy of Science and Technology University of Toronto 2009 Abstract The science of chemistry has undergone two major transformative changes during the early modern period, both closely related to two of the most revolutionary episodes in the history of Western science. The dissertation consists of a historical-analytical comparative exploration of early modern chemical thought and practice based on two series of interconnected case studies related, respectively, to the seventeenth-century Scientific Revolution and the eighteenth-century Chemical Revolution. Although rarely considered together in the context of the history of chemistry, during both Revolutions, similar forces combined to generate crises in chemical knowledge and practice, to use a well-known Kuhnian notion. Differences in nature and historical evolution notwithstanding, both instances featured attempts at quantification and physicalist reductions of chemistry: during the 1660s-1680s Boyle advanced a reconciliation of chymical experimental knowledge with the budding mechanical philosophy, predicated upon the physically governed laws of matter and motion; during the last third of the eighteenth-century, Lavoisier (et al.) submitted chemical phenomena to the ‘rule of the balance’, as a part of an all-encompassing experimentalist, theoretical and linguistic reformation anchored in the conservation of weight principle.
    [Show full text]
  • Enriching the Earth: Fritz Haber, Carl Bosch, and the Transformation of World Food Production. by Vaclav Smil. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2004
    Book Reviews / 383 nessing water power to produce scythes for farmers, spindles for textile mills, and cotton thread. Small emphasizes that these were not the activities of ab- sentee investors but of local men and women who mixed manufacturing with agriculture. Beauty and Convenience focuses on a farming community that has received scant attention from historians, but Small makes a convincing case that the way in which the farmers of Sutton fashioned and re-fashioned their houses and landscape reveals their full participation in the historic transformations of their era. Kenneth Hafertepe Baylor University Enriching the Earth: Fritz Haber, Carl Bosch, and the Transformation of World Food Production. By Vaclav Smil. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2004. 360 pp., $19.95, paperback, ISBN 0-262-69313-5. What is the most important technological invention in the twentieth century? Vaclav Smil makes the cogent argument that it is the discovery and industrial- ization of ammonia synthesis by Fritz Haber and Carl Bosch. Without indus- trial N-fixation, as much as two-fifths of the world’s population would starve for want of available protein in their diet, and major advances in high-pressure industrial processes would have been delayed. Likewise, the Haber-Bosch process facilitated world munitions production; encouraged agricultural ex- pansion onto marginal lands, leading to greater greenhouse emissions and soil degradation; and (because of inherent inefficiencies in nitrogen recovery by plants) has led to an unbalanced enrichment of natural ecosystems by nitrogen. It is an odd book given the title. History and society would be unalterably different without Haber and Bosch, but these protagonists do not appear un- til chapters four and five, respectively; then their lives are described in the most perfunctory manner.
    [Show full text]
  • Empirical Support for the Corpuscular Theory in the Seventeenth Century
    EMPIRICAL SUPPORT FOR THE CORPUSCULAR THEORY IN THE SEVENTEENTH CENTURY 1. INTRODUCTION The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the empirical content and experimental foundation of the early seventeenth-century corpuscular hypothesis. Supported by ontological, epistemological, and mathematical arguments, observational and experimental evi• dence played an important part in creating those patterns of thought that were instrumental in the transformation and, even• tually, acceptance of the corpuscular theory of matter. Compared to the rise of astronomy and mechanics, the success of seventeenth-century atomism is ambiguous. Unlike other physical theories of the time the atomic doctrine was not based on exper• iments likely to be accepted by today's scientific standards. In Galileo's inclined plane and his law of falling bodies or in Newton's theory of colors and his experimentum crucis with the prism, for example, theory and experiment, observation and conclu• sion were connected in a way still acceptable to us. In atomism, however, this is not the case, although almost all corpuscular theories of the seventeenth century explicitly claimed to be derived from and based upon experience. Yet, it was not until the nineteenth century that experimental results made the atoms at least plausible. The difficult relationship between seventeenth century atomism and its experimental foundation has been obscured to some extent by later historians. When the standard histories of atomism were written at the end of the nineteenth century1, a final experi• mental confirmation of the corpuscular nature of matter was still lacking. Twentieth-century historians, on the other hand, have underestimated the empirical difficulties involved in early modern atomism.2 Knowing that there are atoms in nature, they could hardly imagine how the protagonists of the scientific revolution should not have arrived at this same conclusion.
    [Show full text]
  • CWCB 29 Page 2 September 1995 the Soviet Union Effectively Stopped in 1985
    CHEMICAL WEAPONS CONVENTION BULLETIN News, Background and Comment on Chemical and Biological Warfare Issues ISSUE NO. 29 SEPTEMBER 1995 Quarterly Journal of the Harvard Sussex Program on CBW Armament and Arms Limitation DEFINING CHEMICAL WEAPONS THE WAY THE TREATY DOES Harmonizing the ways in which states parties implement nor such substances as the nerve gas known as Agent GP, the Chemical Weapons Convention domestically is as least means only that these chemicals have not been singled out as important as properly creating the organization in the for routine verification measures. Their omission from the Hague that will operate the treaty internationally. If states Schedules certainly does not mean that the military may use parties implement the Convention differently in certain es- them as weapons or that the domestic penal legislation re- sential respects, there will be no ‘level playing field’ for sci- quired by Article VII of the Convention should be without entific, industrial and commercial enterprise in the diverse application to their acquisition by terrorists. activities upon which the Convention impinges, nor will the The remedy, of course, is for states to write their domes- Convention achieve its potential as a powerful instrument tic implementing legislation so as to incorporate the Gen- against chemical warfare and chemical terrorism. eral Purpose Criterion, either explicitly or by reference to Of all the possible divergences in national implementa- the text of Article II of the Convention. That the draft leg- tion, the most elementary — and the one that now threatens islation now working its way through the legislative pro- to develop — is divergence regarding the very definition of cesses of some states fails to do this must in part reflect the ‘chemical weapons’ to which the provisions of the Conven- failure of the Preparatory Commission to provide guidance tion apply.
    [Show full text]
  • Military Rearmament and Industrial Competition in Spain Jean-François Berdah
    Military Rearmament and Industrial Competition in Spain Jean-François Berdah To cite this version: Jean-François Berdah. Military Rearmament and Industrial Competition in Spain: Germany versus Great Britain, 1921-1931. Tid og Tanke, Oslo: Unipub, 2005, pp.135-168. hal-00180498 HAL Id: hal-00180498 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00180498 Submitted on 19 Oct 2007 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Military Rearmament and Industrial Competition in Spain: Germany vs. Britain (1921-1931) Jean-François Berdah Toulouse II-Le Mirail University, France The loss of Cuba, the Philippines and Porto Rico as a consequence of the Spanish military defeat against the US Navy in 1898 was considered by the public opinion not only as a tragic humiliation, but also as a national disaster. In spite of the subsequent political and moral crisis, the Spanish government and the young King Alfonso XIII intended nevertheless to rebuild the Army according to their strong belief that Spain still remained a great power. But very soon the conscience of the poor technical level of the national industry forced the Spanish government to gain the support of the foreign knowledge and financial resources.
    [Show full text]
  • Die Deutschen Gaskriegsvorbereitungen 1919—1945
    Rolf-Dieter Müller Die deutschen Gaskriegsvorbereitungen 1919—1945 Mit Giftgas zur Weltmacht? Funde von Kampfstoffmunition des Zweiten Weltkrieges haben in jüngster Zeit das Interesse einer größeren Öffentlichkeit auf historische Vorgänge gelenkt, die nach dem Zusammenbruch des Dritten Reiches weitgehend in Vergessenheit geraten wa- ren. Während die Formen konventioneller Kriegführung in einer kaum noch zu über- schauenden Literaturfülle ihre Darstellung gefunden haben, sind die Vorbereitungen des Deutschen Reiches auf eine chemische Kriegführung von der Militärgeschichts- schreibung nach 1945 ausgespart worden. Vereinzelte Hinweise in der angelsächsi- schen Literatur basieren überwiegend auf umfangreichen, aber fragwürdigen Inter- views, die von der US-Armee zusammengetragen worden sind1. Anders als nach dem Ersten Weltkrieg haben die beteiligten Fachleute und Offiziere das Licht der Öffent- lichkeit gescheut und ihre Tätigkeit während der Weimarer Republik und des Dritten Reiches zu tarnen und zu verharmlosen gesucht. Vergleicht man damit die Flut ein- schlägiger Literatur im Deutschland der Zwischenkriegszeit, in der die chemischen Waffen als zukunftsträchtige und entscheidende Instrumente eines künftigen Krieges geschildert wurden2, so muß dieses Ergebnis erstaunen. Die Erklärung dieser publizistischen Zurückhaltung liegt auf der Hand. Chemische Kriegführung war schon nach dem Ersten Weltkrieg vielfach geächtet worden. Vor- bereitungen zu einem erneuten Einsatz von Kampfstoffen fanden weder bei den Mili- tärs noch im öffentlichen
    [Show full text]
  • The Grounds for and Excellence of the Corpuscular Or Mechanical Philosophy
    The Grounds for and Excellence of the Corpuscular or Mechanical Philosophy Robert Boyle 1674 Copyright © Jonathan Bennett 2017. All rights reserved [Brackets] enclose editorial explanations. Small ·dots· enclose material that has been added, but can be read as though it were part of the original text. Occasional •bullets, and also indenting of passages that are not quotations, are meant as aids to grasping the structure of a sentence or a thought. Every four-point ellipsis . indicates the omission of a brief passage that seems to present more difficulty than it is worth. Longer omissions are reported between brackets in normal-sized type.—This short piece by Boyle opens and closes in the form of a letter; there is no known addressee; and most of the thing reads as though it wasn’t really addressed to any individual.—The section-breaks and -headings are not Boyle’s. First launched: March 2010 Excellence of mechanism Robert Boyle Contents Introduction 1 Four points 2 The versatility of mechanism 3 The world’s soul etc. 6 The top trio 7 Challenges that mechanisms could survive 8 Mechanism isn’t scary 10 Decoding the world 11 Recapitulation 12 Excellence of mechanism Robert Boyle Glossary a priori: When Boyle uses this phrase on page 11 he principle: Throughout the early modern period ‘principle’ isn’t using it in the sense that Kant made famous 80 years (like its cousins in French and Latin) sometimes meant, as it later. That is, he isn’t talking about proving independently does today, a proposition that has some privilege of basicness of all experience that your theory is true.
    [Show full text]
  • History of Philosophy: Early Modern (PHIL 210-3)
    History of Philosophy: Early Modern (PHIL 210-3) Professor Baron Reed Spring Quarter, 2019 office: 3-421 Kresge Hall Lutkin Hall email: [email protected] T/TH 12:30-1:50 office hours: T 2:00-3:00, and by appointment Course Description: The transition from the Medieval to the Modern era in philosophy began, roughly, in the late 16th and early 17th centuries and ended, again roughly, in the late 18th century. New methods of acquiring knowledge, along with a radically different conception of the world, permanently transformed the philosophical enterprise and the broader culture. In this course we will examine the views of some of the most important modern philosophers—especially Descartes, Spinoza, Leibniz, Bayle, Locke, Berkeley, and Hume—on the nature of God, causation, substance, mind, knowledge, and the material world. Additional readings will be drawn from Elizabeth, Galileo, Masham, Boyle, Shepherd, and Du Châtelet. Course Objectives: The course has two primary objectives: (A) To reach a deeper understanding of the philosophical developments that followed in the wake of the Reformation and that accompanied, and made possible, the rise of modern science and the broader Enlightenment; and (B) To develop critical thinking, reading, and writing skills, particularly in light of the new attention to philosophical method in the Early Modern period. Emphasis will be placed on both philosophical and historical methods of reading primary sources, as we attempt to understand both the views of these philosophers in their own terms and as they relate to the work of other philosophers and to broader cultural developments. Required Texts: Ariew, Roger and Watkins, Eric (eds.).
    [Show full text]