A Forum for Electrochemistry and Solid-State Science for 100 Years
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
George De Hevesy in America
Journal of Nuclear Medicine, published on July 13, 2019 as doi:10.2967/jnumed.119.233254 George de Hevesy in America George de Hevesy was a Hungarian radiochemist who was awarded the Nobel Prize in Chemistry in 1943 for the discovery of the radiotracer principle (1). As the radiotracer principle is the foundation of all diagnostic and therapeutic nuclear medicine procedures, Hevesy is widely considered the father of nuclear medicine (1). Although it is well-known that he spent time at a number of European institutions, it is not widely known that he also spent six weeks at Cornell University in Ithaca, NY, in the fall of 1930 as that year’s Baker Lecturer in the Department of Chemistry (2-6). “[T]he Baker Lecturer gave two formal presentations per week, to a large and diverse audience and provided an informal seminar weekly for students and faculty members interested in the subject. The lecturer had an office in Baker Laboratory and was available to faculty and students for further discussion.” (7) There is also evidence that, “…Hevesy visited Harvard [University, Cambridge, MA] as a Baker Lecturer at Cornell in 1930…” (8). Neither of the authors of this Note/Letter was aware of Hevesy’s association with Cornell University despite our longstanding ties to Cornell until one of us (WCK) noticed the association in Hevesy’s biographical page on the official Nobel website (6). WCK obtained both his undergraduate degree and medical degree from Cornell in Ithaca and New York City, respectively, and spent his career in nuclear medicine. JRO did his nuclear medicine training at Columbia University and has subsequently been a faculty member of Weill Cornell Medical College for the last eleven years (with a brief tenure at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (affiliated with Cornell)), and is now the program director of the Nuclear Medicine residency and Chief of the Molecular Imaging and Therapeutics Section. -
Joint International Meeting 2008 H
2008 h h Joint International Meeting honolulu, HI h october 12-17, 2008 214th Meeting of The Electrochemical Society Fall 2008 Meeting of The Electrochemical Society of Japan and with the technical co-sponsorship of l the Japan Society of Applied Physics l the Korean Electrochemical Society l the Electrochemistry Division of the Royal Australian Chemical Institute l the Chinese Society of Electrochemistry 2008 h h h welcome h honolulu, HI October 12-17, 2008 elcome to Honolulu—the state capital and Heart philosophy has become common not only in electrochemical of Hawaii, as well as Oahu’s center of art, history, wet technologies but also in dry technologies. Wand culture. We are pleased to venture into this This philosophical idea is applied also to nano- city again for PRiME 2008 Joint International Meeting: the biotechnology, and it plays an important role in the area 214th ECS Meeting, and the 2008 Fall Meeting of ECSJ. This of health care including biomedicine and bioanalysis. The major international conference will be held at the Hilton interaction between electrochemical nanotechnology and Hawaiian Village (HHV) and the Hawaii Convention Center biotechnology is now creating one of the most notable and (HCC) and will include 53 topical symposia consisting of fascinating new technologies. 3,237 technical presentations. You are invited to participate Tetsuya Osaka is a professor in the Department of Applied not only in the technical program, but also in the other Chemistry, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Waseda social events planned for the meeting. University, Tokyo, Japan, a position he has held since 1986. -
Report to DPR from the Panel Conducting the Peer Review of The
1 May 7, 2011 Administrator Lisa Jackson United States Environmental Protection Agency Ariel Rios Building 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, N. W. Mail Code: 1101A Washington, DC 20460 Re: Docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2010-0541, Petition to Suspend and Cancel All Registrations for the Soil Fumigant Iodomethane (Methyl Iodide) Dear Administrator Jackson, We are pleased to see that US EPA has decided to reconsider the registration of methyl iodide for its use as a soil fumigant pesticide. We remain concerned about the wisdom of widespread dispersion of methyl iodide into the environment and support the petition to cancel all uses of this chemical as a pesticide. It is one of the more hazardous chemicals used in research labs and in the chemical industry, and it seems counterintuitive that EPA would work on one hand to prevent and document relatively small releases of methyl iodide used in research and chemical manufacturing, while permitting what will likely be millions of pounds to be used annually in agriculture near homes, schools and workplaces. In our letter to EPA of September 24, 2007, (which we sent a copy of to you in February of 2009), we strongly recommended that EPA not register methyl iodide, but if the Agency chose to do so, we recommended that US EPA obtain an external scientific peer review of the risk assessment. While EPA did not commission such a review, the state of California has conducted its own risk assessment and did commission a Scientific Review Committee (SRC) to evaluate US EPA’s and the California Department of Pesticide Regulation’s (DPR’s) risk assessments. -
Carl Djerassi: Chemist and Entrepreneur
Carl Djerassi: Chemist and entrepreneur Eugene Garfield 534 CHEMTECH SEPTEMBER 1983 Much has been said about the scientific entrepreneur. established a precedent for the widely used fragment coding Although the term ordinarily is applied to the person who system employed in the Index Chemicus Registry System has been successful in business—one thinks of Thomas (ICRS) and other systems. Edison or Edwin Land, among others—there also are At the end of the 1940s, much of the excitement centered scientific entrepreneurs in the academic community. It is on the discovery that cortisone could alleviate arthritis not often that one finds a scientist who can fit both symptoms. The chemical was derived from animal bile, but descriptions. To maintain a credible academic existence one initially in amounts too small for treating this chronic, needs enormous dedication and energy; to function in a widespread disease. Scientists around the world were racing scientifically oriented business these qualities as well as to find a more practical method of synthesis. In 1951, significant managerial competence are needed. That rare Djerassi and his team at Syntex won the race; they found a combination of qualities is found in my friend Carl relatively simple way to make cortisone using a readily Djerassi. available raw material, the Mexican yam (2). I recently had the honor of speaking informally at an That same year, Djerassi's team synthesized another unusual event. The numerous friends and collaborators of compound, which received much less attention at the time. Djerassi attended a party celebrating the publication of his They named it "norethisterone," and it was to become the thousandth paper. -
Pauling-Linus.Pdf
NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES L I N U S C A R L P A U L I N G 1901—1994 A Biographical Memoir by J A C K D. D UNITZ Any opinions expressed in this memoir are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Academy of Sciences. Biographical Memoir COPYRIGHT 1997 NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS WASHINGTON D.C. LINUS CARL PAULING February 28, 1901–August 19, 1994 BY JACK D. DUNITZ INUS CARL PAULING was born in Portland, Oregon, on LFebruary 28, 1901, and died at his ranch at Big Sur, California, on August 19, 1994. In 1922 he married Ava Helen Miller (died 1981), who bore him four children: Linus Carl, Peter Jeffress, Linda Helen (Kamb), and Edward Crellin. Pauling is widely considered the greatest chemist of this century. Most scientists create a niche for themselves, an area where they feel secure, but Pauling had an enormously wide range of scientific interests: quantum mechanics, crys- tallography, mineralogy, structural chemistry, anesthesia, immunology, medicine, evolution. In all these fields and especially in the border regions between them, he saw where the problems lay, and, backed by his speedy assimilation of the essential facts and by his prodigious memory, he made distinctive and decisive contributions. He is best known, perhaps, for his insights into chemical bonding, for the discovery of the principal elements of protein secondary structure, the alpha-helix and the beta-sheet, and for the first identification of a molecular disease (sickle-cell ane- mia), but there are a multitude of other important contri- This biographical memoir was prepared for publication by both The Royal Society of London and the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. -
The 1990 Nobel Prize Winners
Current CX3mrnerits” EUGENE GARFIELD INSTITUTE FCR SCIENTIFIC INFORMATGW 3YJ1 MARKET ST PHILAOELFHIA, PA 19104 The 199Q Nobel Prize Winners: A Citationist Retrospective Number 11 March 18, 1991 For more than a decade, we have devoted Before the awards were announced last essays to each year’s Nobel Prizes. These year, the biweekly newspaper ?% Scien- reports, usually published six months or tkt @ published a series of axticles in which more after the prize, have provided a unique Nobel Prize contenders were listed, based citationist perspective on the wimers. In ad- on citation frequency and predictor dition to identifying their most-cited works, awards.$7 One would think that with all of especially Citation Clussics ~, we have the non-Nobel awards that abound,g.g there highlighted work that has influenced key re- would be few recipients not in that category. search fronts.1 Nevertheless, this does occur km time to When pertinent, we’ve also listed the time. winners’ contributions to the review litera- One interesting aspect of this year’s ture. And+whe~ possible, we’ve contacted awards is the relatively low level of citations the Nobelists or close colleagues to de- for several of the winners. This could be due termine whether or not our data rein- to factors similar to those of the famous forced or contradicted perceptions of de- Watson and Crick paper in 1953,10 for layed recognition, as in the case with which they teceived the 1%2 Nobel Prize in Barbara Mc(lintock.z Her 1983 Nobel for physiology or medicine. It had been cited physiology or medicine may have been de- just under 1,100 times when we last studied layed, but she was widely recognized in the it.11This is an indication of obliteration by genetics community. -
April 17-19, 2018 the 2018 Franklin Institute Laureates the 2018 Franklin Institute AWARDS CONVOCATION APRIL 17–19, 2018
april 17-19, 2018 The 2018 Franklin Institute Laureates The 2018 Franklin Institute AWARDS CONVOCATION APRIL 17–19, 2018 Welcome to The Franklin Institute Awards, the a range of disciplines. The week culminates in a grand United States’ oldest comprehensive science and medaling ceremony, befitting the distinction of this technology awards program. Each year, the Institute historic awards program. celebrates extraordinary people who are shaping our In this convocation book, you will find a schedule of world through their groundbreaking achievements these events and biographies of our 2018 laureates. in science, engineering, and business. They stand as We invite you to read about each one and to attend modern-day exemplars of our namesake, Benjamin the events to learn even more. Unless noted otherwise, Franklin, whose impact as a statesman, scientist, all events are free, open to the public, and located in inventor, and humanitarian remains unmatched Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. in American history. Along with our laureates, we celebrate his legacy, which has fueled the Institute’s We hope this year’s remarkable class of laureates mission since its inception in 1824. sparks your curiosity as much as they have ours. We look forward to seeing you during The Franklin From sparking a gene editing revolution to saving Institute Awards Week. a technology giant, from making strides toward a unified theory to discovering the flow in everything, from finding clues to climate change deep in our forests to seeing the future in a terahertz wave, and from enabling us to unplug to connecting us with the III world, this year’s Franklin Institute laureates personify the trailblazing spirit so crucial to our future with its many challenges and opportunities. -
4. Marie Curie, Ethics and Research
CATHERINE MILNE 4. MARIE CURIE, ETHICS AND RESEARCH INTRODUCTION Recently Chemistry and Engineering News (Bard, Prestwich, Wight, Heller, & Zimmerman, 2010) carried a series of commentaries on the culture of academic research in chemistry with a focus on the role of funding in research. Initially, Alan Bard decried how decisions about tenure seem more and more to focus on grant getting rather than consideration of the applicant’s accomplishments generated because of access to this funding. Bard argued further that often this funding was based, not on the quality of the proposed research but on a researcher’s ability to “hype their research” and damming truth in the process (Bard et al., 2010, p. 27). According to him, there was a disturbing trend in universities for researchers to be encouraged, almost expected, to generate patents and from there, even to be involved in initiating “start up” companies. Other researchers responded. Glen Prestwich and Charles Wight (Bard et al., 2010) argue that if researchers were able to present a clear connection between “taxpayer dollars” and funded research, the public would realize the value that science delivers. Prestwich and Wight argue further that a new cadre of researchers is involved in identifying real world problems, translating basic research into applications, and creating products as well as publications. Moving from basic research to applications that address real world problems is called translational research, and Prestwich and Wight see this research as a positive development in chemistry. Adam Heller (Bard et al., 2010) weighs in claiming that the pursuit of “patent-protected, people-serving products” was not “a sad sign of our times but a reawakening of the proud history of academic chemistry and chemical engineering” (p. -
Enriching the Earth: Fritz Haber, Carl Bosch, and the Transformation of World Food Production. by Vaclav Smil. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2004
Book Reviews / 383 nessing water power to produce scythes for farmers, spindles for textile mills, and cotton thread. Small emphasizes that these were not the activities of ab- sentee investors but of local men and women who mixed manufacturing with agriculture. Beauty and Convenience focuses on a farming community that has received scant attention from historians, but Small makes a convincing case that the way in which the farmers of Sutton fashioned and re-fashioned their houses and landscape reveals their full participation in the historic transformations of their era. Kenneth Hafertepe Baylor University Enriching the Earth: Fritz Haber, Carl Bosch, and the Transformation of World Food Production. By Vaclav Smil. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2004. 360 pp., $19.95, paperback, ISBN 0-262-69313-5. What is the most important technological invention in the twentieth century? Vaclav Smil makes the cogent argument that it is the discovery and industrial- ization of ammonia synthesis by Fritz Haber and Carl Bosch. Without indus- trial N-fixation, as much as two-fifths of the world’s population would starve for want of available protein in their diet, and major advances in high-pressure industrial processes would have been delayed. Likewise, the Haber-Bosch process facilitated world munitions production; encouraged agricultural ex- pansion onto marginal lands, leading to greater greenhouse emissions and soil degradation; and (because of inherent inefficiencies in nitrogen recovery by plants) has led to an unbalanced enrichment of natural ecosystems by nitrogen. It is an odd book given the title. History and society would be unalterably different without Haber and Bosch, but these protagonists do not appear un- til chapters four and five, respectively; then their lives are described in the most perfunctory manner. -
2014 Chemistry Newsletter
FALL 2014 Welcome from the Head Construction Begins on Greetings from the Department of Chemistry! This has been Science Learning Center another successful year for UGA Chemistry, and I am pleased to report more good news about our department, faculty and students. University enrollment continues to grow each year – this fall, the university enrolled 35,197 students. The increase in student numbers, particularly in the rapidly growing engineering program, has created significant extra demand for Chemistry courses. This growth in instructional demand will help us to make a case for the continued growth of our faculty numbers. As I have mentioned in the past, faculty recruiting is one of the most significant and satisfying parts of my job. Jon Amster In the last year, we were able to recruit a new organic faculty member. Prof. Eric Ferreira comes to us from Colorado State University, where he established a successful and well-funded research program in synthetic organic chemistry. Eric and four Rendering of the future Science Learning Center of his graduate students moved to Athens over the summer. While his laboratory renovations are taking place, his students are hard at work in temporary space, and his program has hit he long-awaited Science Learning Center (SLC) the ground running. You can read more about Eric and his research activities inside this has finally become a reality, with groundbreaking issue of the newsletter. We have also just completed the recruitment of an organic lecturer, ceremonies attended by Governor Nathan Deal Doug Jackson. Doug is a product of our department, where he is completing his Ph.D. -
The Golden Fleece, Science Education, and U.S. Science Policy1
The Golden Fleece, Science Education, 1 and U.S. Science Policy Richard C. Atkinson President University of California was pleased to accept Roger Hahn’s kind invitation to participate in I this colloquium series. It gave me an opportunity to rethink some events I was associated with at the National Science Foundation (NSF) in the 1970s. I would like to review briefly U.S. science policy since World War II from the perspective of the National Science Foundation, and in particular from the narrower perspective of science education and the social sciences at NSF. This is a personal account, not a schol- arly one, and I would be delighted if my remarks were to stimulate some aspiring young historians to undertake a more careful study of the events I am going to discuss. My story begins with World War II and the remarkable success of U.S. science in the war effort—a critical factor in our victory. President Roosevelt’s science adviser, Vannevar Bush, had been a long-term member of the faculty at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology; he was one of the key people responsible for building the quality of that institution. Bush had a close personal relationship with Roosevelt. Near the end of the war the president asked him to define a plan for American science in the postwar period. That request led to Bush’s landmark report, Science, The Endless Frontier, one of the great documents of American history. The Bush report defined science policy for the post-World War II era. What was the nature of that report? No summary could do justice to Bush’s masterful analysis, but essentially he made three principal arguments about the future of the U.S. -
Robert Burns Woodward
The Life and Achievements of Robert Burns Woodward Long Literature Seminar July 13, 2009 Erika A. Crane “The structure known, but not yet accessible by synthesis, is to the chemist what the unclimbed mountain, the uncharted sea, the untilled field, the unreached planet, are to other men. The achievement of the objective in itself cannot but thrill all chemists, who even before they know the details of the journey can apprehend from their own experience the joys and elations, the disappointments and false hopes, the obstacles overcome, the frustrations subdued, which they experienced who traversed a road to the goal. The unique challenge which chemical synthesis provides for the creative imagination and the skilled hand ensures that it will endure as long as men write books, paint pictures, and fashion things which are beautiful, or practical, or both.” “Art and Science in the Synthesis of Organic Compounds: Retrospect and Prospect,” in Pointers and Pathways in Research (Bombay:CIBA of India, 1963). Robert Burns Woodward • Graduated from MIT with his Ph.D. in chemistry at the age of 20 Woodward taught by example and captivated • A tenured professor at Harvard by the age of 29 the young... “Woodward largely taught principles and values. He showed us by • Published 196 papers before his death at age example and precept that if anything is worth 62 doing, it should be done intelligently, intensely • Received 24 honorary degrees and passionately.” • Received 26 medals & awards including the -Daniel Kemp National Medal of Science in 1964, the Nobel Prize in 1965, and he was one of the first recipients of the Arthur C.