Improve Livelihoods in Targeted Drought Affected Communities in Kenya”

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Improve Livelihoods in Targeted Drought Affected Communities in Kenya” Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Office of Evaluation Improve Livelihoods in Targeted Drought Affected Communities in Kenya- OSRO/KEN/002/SWE Evaluation report February 2012 Final Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Office of Evaluation (OED) This report is available in electronic format at: http://www.fao.org/evaluation Permission to make copy, download or print copies of part or all of this work for private study and limited classroom use is hereby granted, free of charge, provided that an accurate citation and suitable acknowledgement of FAO as the source and copyright owner is given. Where copyright holders other than FAO are indicated, please refer to the original copyright holder for terms and conditions of reuse. All requests for systematic copying and electronic distribution, including to list servers, translation rights and commercial reuse should be addressed to [email protected] . For further information, please contact: Director, OED Viale delle Terme di Caracalla 1, 00153 Rome, Italy Email: [email protected] ___________________________________________________________________________ The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of FAO concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. FINAL EVALUATION of the Sida-funded Project OSRO/KEN/002/SWE3 “Improve Livelihoods in Targeted Drought Affected Communities in Kenya” FINAL REPORT Prepared by Patrizio Warren Simbarashe Sibanda i ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We would like to express our gratitude to Aurélie Larmoyer, FAO Evaluation Officer, and her team at FAO Headquarters, for technical guidance and logistics to and from Nairobi; to Angela Hinrichs from FAO Emergency Operation Service for her inception briefing; to Robert Allport for being the Evaluation Focal Person in Kenya; to Paul Omanga for the briefing and organization of field mission appointments; the District Agricultural Officers and implementing partner NGOs (CED, MUKY-ORDAP, KENGROW and WEMIHS) in the Project districts of Mwingi Central, Mumoni, Kyuso and Tseikuru for organizing the meetings with district authorities and beneficiary groups; all the stakeholders at FAO-Kenya in Nairobi, the district officers and communities for making time available to meet with us and freely share their experiences and information; Anne Kinyua for organizing our accommodation and secretarial support in Nairobi; and Stephen Wafula for taking care of all the logistics in the field. Doris and Emmanuel provided translation services during out meetings with the communities, for which we are very grateful. ii CONTENTS ACRONYMS ....................................................................................................................... vi EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................ viii 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Project background .......................................................................................................... 1 1.2. Purpose of the evaluation ................................................................................................ 2 1.3 Methodology of the evaluation ......................................................................................... 3 2. CONTEXT OF THE PROJECT ............................................................................................ 5 3. ASSESSMENT OF CONCEPT, RELEVANCE AND APPROPRIATNESS ..................... 8 3.1 Project design ................................................................................................................... 8 3.2 Relevance ........................................................................................................................ 10 4. PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION ....................................................................................... 12 4.1 Government support ....................................................................................................... 12 4.2 Technical backstopping .................................................................................................. 12 4.3 Identification and selection of implementing partners and selection of locations within districts ................................................................................................................ 13 4.4 Timeliness of implementation of field activities ............................................................. 14 4.5 The implementation process ........................................................................................... 14 4.6 Analysis of partnerships ................................................................................................. 19 5. RESULTS AND CONTRIBUTION TO STATED OBJECTIVES (PROJECT EFFECTIVENESS) ............................................................................................................. 20 5.1 Output 1: Food Security Information and Early Warning Systems established in targeted districts ............................................................................................................. 20 5.2 Output 2: Resilience of vulnerable communities increased ........................................... 23 5.3 Output 3: Access to HIV and AIDS services among the targeted communities ............. 26 5.4 Outcome (overall effectiveness and cost effectiveness) .................................................. 28 6. SUSTAINABILITY AND POTENTIAL IMPACT ........................................................... 32 7. CONCLUSIONS, LESSONS LEARNED AND RECOMMENDATIONS ....................... 34 7.1 Conclusions .................................................................................................................... 34 7.2 Lessons learned .............................................................................................................. 37 iii 7.3 Recommendations ........................................................................................................... 38 REFERENCES AND BIBLIOGRAPHY .......................................................................... 39 ANNEXES ......................................................................................................................... 41 iv TABLES Table 1 - Main topics and relevant evaluation questions as per OED’s ToR Table 2 - Number, types of farmers groups and membership by gender Table 3 - Type of facilitators’ trainings conducted by the Project Table 4 - Degree of achievement of logframe quantitative indicators for output 1 and relevant activities Table 5 - Degree of achievement of logframe quantitative indicators for output 2 and relevant activities Table 6 - Degree of achievement of logframe quantitative indicators for output 3 and relevant activities LIST OF ANNEXES Annex 1 – Terms of Reference of the Evaluation Annex 2 – Project logical framework Annex 3 – Map of the Project area: Larger Mwingi District Annex 4 – Evaluation Mission Agenda Annex 5 – List of people met and interviewed v ACRONYMS AESA Agro–Ecosystem Analysis AGN Nutrition and Consumer Protection Division (FAO) AIDS Acquired Immuno-Deficiency Syndrome ALRMP Arid Land Resource Management Project ARV Anti-RetroViral ASAL Arid and Semi Arid Lands ASDS Agriculture Sector Development Strategy CAADP Comprehensive Africa Agriculture Development Programme CAP Consolidated Appeals Processes CED Caring of Environment for Development (NGO) CFW Cash for Work CPF Country Programme Framework DAO District Agriculture Office(r) DC District Commissioner DISK Data and Information (Sub-Sector of KFSSG ) DMO Drought Management Office(r) DRR Disaster Risk Reduction DSG District Steering Group FA Farmer Association FAO Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations FAO-KE Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations - Kenya FBO Faith Based Organizations FFLS Farmers’ Field and Life Schools FGD Focus Group Discussion FIVIMS Food Security and Vulnerability Information Mapping Systems GDP Gross Domestic Product GIS Geographical Information System GOK Government of Kenya HIV Human Immunovirus IPC Integrated Food Security Phase Classification JFFLS Junior Farmers’ Field and Life Schools KENGROW Kenyan Network of Grassroots Women Trust KFSM Kenya Food Security Meeting vi KFSSG Kenya Food Security Steering Group Ksh Kenya shilling LoA Letter of Agreement MoA Ministry of Agriculture (Kenya) MUKY – ORDAP Mumoni and Kyuso Organization for Rural Development and Active Participation (NGO) NGO Non-Governmental Organization NPC National Project Coordinator OCHA United Nation Office for Humanitarian Affairs OED Office of Evaluation (FAO) OVC Orphans and Vulnerable Children PLWHA People Living With HIV and AIDS POC Project Oversight Committee ProDoc Project Document SCA Soil Conservation Assistant SEK Swedish Kroner SL Sustainable Livelihoods SRA Short Rains Assessment SWC Soil and Water Conservation TCE Technical Cooperation Emergency Division (FAO) ToR Terms of Reference UNDP United Nations Development Programme
Recommended publications
  • A Water Infrastructure Audit of Kitui County
    Research Report Research Report Sustainable WASH Systems Learning Partnership A WATER INFRASTRUCTURE AUDIT OF KITUI COUNTY Cliff Nyaga, University of Oxford January 2019 PHOTO CREDIT:PHOTO CLIFF NYAGA/UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD Prepared by: Cliff Nyaga, University of Oxford Reviewed by: Mike Thomas, Rural Focus; Eduardo Perez, Global Communities; Karl Linden, University of Colorado Boulder (UCB); and Pranav Chintalapati, UCB. Acknowledgements: The Kitui County Government would like to acknowledge the financial support received from the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). Further, the Kitui County Government appreciates its longstanding partnership with the University of Oxford and UNICEF Kenya through various collaborating programs, including the DFID-funded REACH Program. The leadership received from Emmanuel Kisangau, Kennedy Mutati, Philip Nzula, Augustus Ndingo, and Hope Sila — all from the County Ministry for Water Agriculture and Livestock Development — throughout the audit exercise is appreciated. The sub-county water officers were instrumental in logistics planning and in providing liaison between the field audit teams, communities, and County Ministries for Agriculture, Water, and Livestock Development and Administration and Coordination. A team of local enumerators led field data collection: Lucy Mweti, Grace Muisyo, Abigael Kyenze, Patrick Mulwa, Lydia Mwikali, Muimi Kivoko, Philip Muthengi, Mary Sammy, Ruth Mwende, Peter Musili, Annah Kavata, James Kimanzi, Purity Maingi, Felix Muthui, and Assumpta Mwikali. The technical advice and guidance received from Professor Rob Hope of the University of Oxford and Dr. Andrew Trevett of UNICEF Kenya throughout the planning, data collection, analysis, and preparation of this report is very much appreciated. Front cover: This Katanu Hand pump was developed in the late 1990s by the Government of Kenya and is the main water source for Nzamba Village in Ikutha Ward, Kitui.
    [Show full text]
  • The Geography of the Intra-National Digital Divide in a Developing Country: a Spatial
    The Geography of the Intra-National Digital Divide in a Developing Country: A Spatial Analysis of Regional-Level Data in Kenya A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate School of the University of Cincinnati in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Regional Development Planning in the School of Planning of the College of Design, Architecture, Art, and Planning By Kenneth Koech Cheruiyot M.A. (Planning) (Nairobi), M. Arch. in Human Settlements (KULeuven) December 2010 This work and its defense approved by: Committee Chair: Johanna W. Looye, Ph.D. ABSTRACT It is widely agreed that different technologies (e.g., the steam engine, electricity, and the telephone) have revolutionized the world in various ways. As such, both old and new information and communication technologies (ICTs) are instrumental in the way they act as pre- requisites for development. However, the existence of the digital divide, defined as unequal access to and use of ICTs among individuals, households, and businesses within and among regions, and countries, threatens equal world, national, and regional development. Given confirmed evidence that past unequal access to ICTs have accentuated national and regional income differences, the fear of further divergence is real in developing countries now that we live in a world characterized by economic globalization and accelerated international competition (i.e., New Economy). In Africa and Kenya, for instance, the presence of wide digital divides – regionally, between rural and urban areas, and within the urban areas – means that their threat is real. This research, which employed spatial analysis and used the district as a geographical unit of analysis, carried out a detailed study of ICTs’ development potential and challenges in Kenya.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impacts of Hydropower Development on Rural Livelihood
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Lirias International Journal of Water Resources Development, 2015 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07900627.2015.1056297 The impacts of hydropower development on rural livelihood sustenance Eric Ochieng Okukua,b*, Steven Bouillona, Jacob Odhiambo Ochiewob,c, Fridah Munyib, Linet Imbayi Kiteresib and Mwakio Toled aDepartment of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; bKenya Marine and Fisheries Research Institute, Mombasa, Kenya; cDepartment of Development Studies, Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology, Nairobi, Kenya; dDepartment of Environmental Sciences, Pwani University, School of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Kilifi, Kenya (Received 22 October 2014; accepted 24 May 2015) The existing reservoirs on the River Tana (Kenya) were mainly constructed for hydropower generation, with inadequate consideration of the long-term impacts on downstream livelihoods. We investigated the impacts of the reservoirs on people’s livelihoods downstream. The results showed a few positive impacts in the vicinity of the reservoirs and numerous negative impacts downstream (i.e. reduced flood-recess agriculture and floodplain pastoralism, and escalating resource-use conflicts). Inadequate stakeholders’ consultation during reservoir development was also observed. We recommend a detailed basin-wide socioeconomic assessment for future reservoir developments and controlled flood release to simulate the natural flow regime, thereby restoring indigenous flood-based livelihoods while retaining sufficient reserves for power generation. Keywords: River Tana; Kenya; communities’ perception; hydropower development; impact assessment; floods Introduction River basins are the cradles of civilization and cultural heritage. Ancient and modern civilizations first developed in the vicinity of great rivers due to the role of rivers in the provision of food to support livelihoods, inputs for industries, and by providing opportunities for commerce and navigation.
    [Show full text]
  • Economics of Harvesting and Marketing Selected Indigenous Fruits in Mwingi District, Kenya
    ECONOMICS OF HARVESTING AND MARKETING SELECTED INDIGENOUS FRUITS IN MWINGI DISTRICT, KENYA By: C. M. Mwema J. K. Lagat and B. K. Mutai Invited paper presented at the 4th International Conference of the African Association of Agricultural Economists, September 22-25, 2013, Hammamet, Tunisia Copyright 2013 by [authors]. All rights reserved. Readers may make verbatim copies of this document for non-commercial purposes by any means, provided that this copyright notice appears on all such copies. 107- ECONOMICS OF HARVESTING AND MARKETING SELECTED INDIGENOUS FRUITS IN MWINGI DISTRICT, KENYA C.M. Mwema 1*, J.K. Lagat1 and B.K. Mutai1 1 Egerton University, Department of Agricultural Economics, P.O. Box 536-20115, Egerton, Kenya. Abstract Constant droughts especially in the Arid and Semi-Arid Lands (ASAL) have led to recurrent crop failures and livestock losses. Households have therefore resulted to other alternatives which can provide both food and income. Trade in indigenous fruits contributes to livelihoods through income generation and as a safety net for consumption and income smoothing. This paper presents the analysis of economic returns from harvesting and marketing indigenous fruits and the socio economic factors that influence participation in trade of indigenous fruits. The results are based on a survey conducted in Nuu division, Mwingi District, where 120 randomly selected households were interviewed using a pre-tested semi-structured questionnaire. Logistic regression model, Gross Margin Analysis, and Benefit cost ratios were used during the analysis. Data was processed and analyzed using SPSS20. The Gross margins depicted harvesting of indigenous fruits for trade as a profitable venture. High benefit cost ratios of greater than 3.0 were reported in all the three fruits under study.
    [Show full text]
  • SK NCPWD List of Hospitals.Xlsx
    S/NO PROVINCE DISTRICT HEALTH FACILITY NAME TYPE OF HEALTH FACILTY 1 central Gatundu south Gatundu District Hospital District Hospital 2 central kirinyaga east kianyaga sub-District Hospital Sub-District Hospital 3 central Thika west Thika District Hospital District Hospital 4 central Ruiru Ruiru Sub-District Hospital Sub-District Hospital 5 central kabete Nyathuna Sub-District hospital Sub-District Hospital 6 central Murang`a west kangema Sob-District Hospital Sub-District Hospital 7 central kiambaa kiambu District Hospital District Hospital 8 central kiambaa Kihara Sub-District Hospital Sub-District Hospital 9 central Murang`a east Murang`a District Hospital District Hospital 10 central murang`a east Muriranjas District Hospital District Hospital 11 central kinangop Engineer District Hospital District Hospital 12 central kirinyaga central Kerugoya District Hospital District Hospital 13 central kiambu west Tigoni District Hospital District Hospital 14 central Murang`a south Maragwa Distric Hospital District Hospital 15 central Mathira east Karatina District Hospital District Hospital 16 central Mukurweini Mukurweini Sub-District hospital Sub-District Hospital 17 central kirinyaga south Kimbimbi Sub-Distric Hospital Sub-District Hospital 18 central Nyeri central Nyeri provincial General hospital Provincial Hospital 19 central Nyeri central Mt. kenya Sub-district Hospital Sub-District Hospital 20 central Nyandarua central Ol`kalou District Hospital District Hospital 21 central Nyandarua north Nyahururu District Hospital District Hospital
    [Show full text]
  • Explaining Resource Use, Management and Productivity Among the Akamba, Orma and Somali in the Former Eastern Statelands of Kenya
    ©Kamla-Raj 2004 Stud. Tribes Tribals, 2(1): 55-63 (2004) Common Range, Different Tribes: Explaining Resource Use, Management and Productivity among the Akamba, Orma and Somali in the former Eastern Statelands of Kenya Dickson Mong’are Nyariki1 and Jan Van den Abeele2 1. Department of Range Management, University of Nairobi P.O. Box 29053, Nairobi, Kenya Email: [email protected] 2. Forestry Development Support Programme, Belgian Technical Cooperation, P.O. Box 30513, Nairobi, Kenya KEYWORDS Common use; range management; resource conflicts; Eastern Statelands; Kenya ABSTRACT This paper describes the major livelihood activities of three ethnic communities who use in common the former Kenyan Eastern Statelands. It also looks at how the livelihoods and the range could be improved while maintaining the common access to resources, so as to avoid potential conflicts. It is suggested that for improvement of range management the unsettled lands should be accessed by all the communities under ranching societies without having to exclude non-members. A number of approaches should be instituted, including bush control and reseeding. Bush control can be achieved through exploitation of trees of low timber value for charcoal production to earn income for households. To increase livestock productivity, it is proposed that proper livestock and grazing management be practised, including the introduction of superior breeds, improved livestock facilities, adequate animal healthcare and rotational grazing through paddocking. INTRODUCTION and improve the living standards of the communities, the stakeholders and development The colonial government in Kenya set aside agents should rethink the use and management the former Eastern Statelands for State of this resource.
    [Show full text]
  • Rift Valley Fever in Kenya: History of Epizootics and Identification Of
    Epidemiol. Infect. (2011), 139, 372–380. f Cambridge University Press 2010 This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. doi:10.1017/S0950268810001020 Rift Valley fever in Kenya: history of epizootics and identification of vulnerable districts R. M. MURITHI 1, P. MUNYUA1,P.M.ITHONDEKA1, J.M. MACHARIA1, A. HIGHTOWER2,E.T.LUMAN3, R.F. BREIMAN2 AND M. KARIUKI NJENGA 2* 1 Kenya Ministry of Livestock Development, Kabete, Kenya 2 Global Disease Detection Division, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention – Kenya, Nairobi, Kenya 3 Global Immunization Division, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA (Accepted 9 April 2010; first published online 18 May 2010) SUMMARY Since Kenya first reported Rift Valley fever (RVF)-like disease in livestock in 1912, the country has reported the most frequent epizootics of RVF disease. To determine the pattern of disease spread across the country after its introduction in 1912, and to identify regions vulnerable to the periodic epizootics, annual livestock disease records at the Department of Veterinary Services from 1910 to 2007 were analysed in order to document the number and location of RVF-infected livestock herds. A total of 38/69 (55%) administrative districts in the country had reported RVF epizootics by the end of 2007. During the 1912–1950 period, the disease was confined to a district in Rift Valley province that is prone to flooding and where livestock were raised in proximity with wildlife. Between 1951 and 2007, 11 national RVF epizootics were recorded with an average inter-epizootic period of 3.6 years (range 1–7 years); in addition, all epizootics occurred in years when the average annual rainfall increased by more than 50% in the affected districts.
    [Show full text]
  • Aprp 2011/2012 Fy
    KENYA ROADS BOARD ANNUAL PUBLIC ROADS PROGRAMME FY 2011/ 2012 Kenya Roads Board (KRB) is a State Corporation established under the Kenya Roads Board Act, 1999. Its mandate is to oversee the road network in Kenya and coordinate its development, rehabilitation and maintenance funded by the KRB Fund and to advise the Minister for Roads on all matters related thereto. Our Vision An Effective road network through the best managed fund Our Mission Our mission is to fund and oversee road maintenance, rehabilitation and development through prudent sourcing and utilisation of resources KRB FUND KRB Fund comprises of the Road Maintenance Levy, Transit Toll and Agricultural cess. Fuel levy was established in 1993 by the Road Maintenance Levy Act. Fuel levy is charged at the rate of Kshs 9 per litre of petrol and diesel. The allocation as per the Kenya Roads Board Act is as follows: % Allocation Roads Funded Agency 40% Class A, B and C KENHA 22% Constituency Roads KERRA 10% Critical links – rural roads KERRA 15% Urban Roads KURA 1% National parks/reserves Kenya Wildlife Service 2% Administration Kenya Roads Board 10% Roads under Road Sector Investment Programme KRB/Minister for Roads KENYA ROADS BOARD FOREWORD This Annual Public Roads Programme (APRP) for the Financial Year (FY) 2011/2012 continues to reflect the modest economic growth in the country and consequently minimal growth in KRBF. The Government developed and adopted Vision 2030 which identifies infrastructure as a key enabler for achievement of its objective of making Kenya a middle income country by 2030. The APRP seeks to meet the objectives of Vision 2030 through prudent fund management and provision of an optimal improvement of the road network conditions using timely and technically sound intervention programmes.
    [Show full text]
  • Cross-Border Interaction Spurs Innovation and Hope Among Pastoral and Agro-Pastoral Women of Ethiopia and Kenya by D
    Cross-Border Interaction Spurs Innovation and Hope Among Pastoral and Agro-Pastoral Women of Ethiopia and Kenya By D. Layne Coppock, Seyoum Tezera, Solomon Desta, Mark Mutinda, Stellamaris Muthoka, Getachew Gebru, Abdillahi Aboud, and Azeb Yonas On the Ground • African pastoralists endure poverty, drought, and hunger. Women are especially marginalized because they are illiterate, unskilled, disempowered, and engaged in daily drudgery. • Such women, however, are capable of remarkable, sustained achievements in collective action, livelihood di- versification, micro-finance, and community-based wealth generation. • Women can be profoundly inspired by successful peers. After careful training and mentoring, inspired women can then start new initiatives. • Husbands can be supportive of women’s empowerment because household welfare improves. Men sometimes join—and occasionally help lead—collective-action efforts. • Women’s empowerment should be a major focus in pastoral development projects because of the positive community synergisms women create. Keywords: Boran, Il Chamus, Tugen, Borana Plateau, Marsabit County, Baringo County, peer-to-peer learning, diffusion of innovations. La interacción transfronteriza estimula la innovación y la esperanza entre las mujeres pastoras y agropastoras de etiopía y kenia Perspectiva desde el campo: • Las y los pastores africanos soportan pobreza, sequía y hambre. Las mujeres son especialmente marginadas debido a que son analfabetas, no representan mano de obra calificada, no están empoderadas y se dedican al arduo y tedioso trabajo cotidiano. • Sin embargo, estas mujeres son capaces de logros notables y sostenidos en términos de acción colectiva, diversificación del sustento, microfinanzas y generación de riqueza basada en la comunidad. • Las mujeres pueden ser inspiradas profundamente por pares exitosos.
    [Show full text]
  • Kitui County Drought Early Warning Bulletin for April 2017
    APRIL EW PHASE National Drought Management Authority KITUI COUNTY DROUGHT EARLY WARNING BULLETIN FOR APRIL 2017 Early Warning (EW) Phase Classification Livelihood Zone Phase Trend Marginal Mixed Farming Alarm Improving Mixed Farming Alarm Improving Formal/Urban Employment Alarm Improving COUNTY Alarm IMPROVING Biophysical Value Normal Drought Situation & EW Phase Classification Indicators Range/Value Biophysical Indicators VCI-3 month 9.72 >35 State of Water Sources 4 5-6 . The onset of the long rains was late in the first Vegetation Condition Poor Good week of April compared to third week of Production Value Normal March normally and progression has been indicators poor Livestock Migration Pattern Normal Normal . The county experienced extreme vegetation Livestock Body Conditions Borderline Normal greenness deficit (VCI of 9.72) but the onset of Milk Production (in litres) 1.1 >1.6 rains triggered recovery. Livestock death(Drought) No deaths No deaths . The state of water in main water points is inadequate compared to the long term mean. Crops Condition Fair Good Socio Economic Indicators (Impact Indicators) Access Indicators Value Normal . Normal livestock migration patterns were reported. Terms of Trade (ToT) 57 >83 . The livestock body condition is fair for cattle Milk Consumption (in litres) 1.0 >1.4 and good for goats in most areas of the county. Return distance to water 2.7Km <3.0Km . Milk production and consumption was below sources long term average Utilization indicators Value Normal . Terms of Trade were unfavourable compared Nutrition Status, MUAC (% at 8.6 <8.0 to long term mean. risk of malnutrition) . Percentage of children at risk of malnutrition Coping Strategy Index (CSI) 7.03 N/A was slightly above the normal range.
    [Show full text]
  • Challenges and Prospects for Effective Water Conservation in Mwingi North District, Kitui County, Kenya
    CHALLENGES AND PROSPECTS FOR EFFECTIVE WATER CONSERVATION IN MWINGI NORTH DISTRICT, KITUI COUNTY, KENYA WACHIRA N. SHELMITH Research Project submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the Degree of Bachelor of Environmental Planning and Management of Kenyatta University. DECLARATION I Wachira .N. Shelmith declare that this project report is my original work and it has never been submitted to any department in any institution or university for examination or an award. Signature: ……………………….. Date: …………………………. Wachira .N. Shelmith (N36S/17918/2009) APPROVAL This project report has been submitted for examination with my approval as the supervisor. Signature: ………………………… Date: …………………………. Mr. Wilson Nyaoro DEDICATION I dedicate this project to my parents, Mr. and Mrs. Wachira. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT I first of all thank God for the much he has done for me this far. I thank my parents for the support and provision during the research. My siblings, friends and classmates, thank you for the encouragement and motivation to finishing this project. I thank Kenyatta University for the opportunity to study my course and the School of Environmental Studies at large. Thanks to the Department of Environmental Planning and Management, for the support for the four years that I have been in school. Special thanks to my project supervisor, Mr. Wilson Nyaoro for the encouragement and guidance through this project. I would finally love to acknowledge the entire Mwingi Community, Institutions and residents for giving me support and provision of relevant information during my research. ABSTRACT Water conservation involves the strategies and activities that are used to manage water resources, especially fresh water as a sustainable resource.
    [Show full text]
  • Meru North District Environment Action Plan 2009-2013 Executive Summary
    REPUBLIC OF KENYA MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND MINERAL RESOURCES MERU NORTH DISTRICT ENVIRONMENT ACTION PLAN 2009-2013 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Economic growth and environment are closely intertwined in Kenya’s development. Environmental Action Planning is a tool that aims at enhancing the integration of environment into development planning. Meru North District faces many environmental challenges with some being unique to the District. Some of the challenges include; Poverty has lead to the over-use and destruction of environment. Continued reliance on trees for fuel and wetlands for farming and its resources has lead to deforestation and wetland encroachment. Annual flooding continues to destroy property and frustrate farming. The DEAP highlights priority themes and activities for the District towards achieving sustainable development. The report is divided into eight chapters. Chapter one gives the challenges of sustainable development and also describes the rationale for and preparatory process of the DEAP. The chapter introduces the district’s main profile covering the physical features, demographic, agro- ecological zones, and main environmental issues. Chapter two describes the District’s Environment and Natural resources of Land, Water, Biodiversity (forest, wildlife, and Dry lands biodiversity), wetlands and agriculture, livestock and fisheries. For each resource, major environmental issues, challenges and proposed interventions are identified. Chapter three discusses the Human settlements and infrastructure in Meru North District covering situation analysis, challenges and proposed interventions. Environmental challenges addressed include; waste management, sanitation, pollution, diseases, land use, demand for water, energy, materials for construction, land and wetlands degradation, policy and legislation, biodiversity loss and land tenure. Chapter four addresses environmental aspects in tourism, trade, industry and services sectors.
    [Show full text]