DOCSLIB.ORG

Kwomtari Phonology and Grammar Essentials

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Kwomtari Phonology and Grammar Essentials Data Papers on Papua New Guinea Languages Volume 55 Kwomtari Phonology and Grammar Essentials edited by Murray Honsberger Carol Honsberger Ian Tupper 2008 SIL-PNG Academic Publications Ukarumpa, Papua New Guinea Papers in the series Data Papers on Papua New Guinea Languages express the authors’ knowledge at the time of writing. They normally do not provide a comprehensive treatment of the topic and may contain analyses which will be modified at a later stage. However, given the large number of undescribed languages in Papua New Guinea, SIL- PNG feels that it is appropriate to make these research results available at this time. René van den Berg, Series Editor Copyright © 2008 SIL-PNG Papua New Guinea [email protected] Published 2008 Printed by SIL Printing Press Ukarumpa, Eastern Highlands Province Papua New Guinea ISBN 9980-0-3426-0 Table of Contents List of maps and tables...................................................................................viii Abbreviations.................................................................................................... ix Introduction to the Kwomtari people and language by Carol Honsberger, Murray Honsberger and Ian Tupper ............. 1 1. Introduction................................................................................................ 2 1.1 Language setting.................................................................................. 2 1.2 The Kwomtari people........................................................................... 5 1.2.1 Traditional way of life ............................................................... 5 1.2.2 Church history............................................................................ 8 1.2.3 Transportation............................................................................ 9 1.2.4 Health......................................................................................... 9 1.2.5 Wealth and income .................................................................. 10 1.2.6 Linguistic vitality and education.............................................. 10 1.3 Linguistic description......................................................................... 11 1.3.1 Language name and dialects .................................................... 11 1.3.2 Earlier work............................................................................. 12 1.3.3 Linguistic classification........................................................... 12 1.3.4 Typological overview.............................................................. 13 1.3.5 The papers................................................................................ 14 Acknowledgements.................................................................................... 15 Part I Kwomtari Phonology Essentials by Julia Drew................................... 17 1. Introduction.............................................................................................. 18 Acknowledgements.................................................................................... 19 2. Phonemic inventory ................................................................................. 20 2.1 Consonant phonemes.......................................................................... 20 2.2 Vowel phonemes................................................................................ 24 3. Phonotactics.............................................................................................. 31 3.1 Syllable structure................................................................................ 31 iii iv 3.2 Consonant clusters.............................................................................. 34 4. Phonological processes............................................................................. 36 4.1 Labialisation ....................................................................................... 36 4.2 Prenasalisation.................................................................................... 38 4.3 Semi-vowels ....................................................................................... 39 5. Suprasegmentals....................................................................................... 42 6. Morphophonemics.................................................................................... 44 6.1 Morphophonemic variations affecting nouns..................................... 44 6.1.1 Locative suffix......................................................................... 44 6.1.2 Pronoun suffixes....................................................................... 45 6.2 Morphophonemic variations affecting verbs...................................... 46 6.2.1 First person singular subject marker ........................................ 46 6.2.2 Vowel harmony........................................................................ 47 6.2.3 Vowel raising ........................................................................... 47 7. Recommended orthography.................................................................... 51 Part II Kwomtari Grammar Essentials by Katharine Spencer........................53 1. Introduction.............................................................................................. 54 2. Nouns and noun phrases.......................................................................... 56 2.1 Nouns.................................................................................................. 56 2.1.1 Types of nouns ......................................................................... 56 2.1.2 Kinship nouns........................................................................... 57 2.1.3 Adjectives................................................................................. 58 2.1.4 Compound nouns..................................................................... 60 2.1.5 Derived nouns.......................................................................... 61 2.2 Quantifiers .......................................................................................... 63 2.2.1 Numerals .................................................................................. 63 2.2.2 Non-specific quantifiers........................................................... 64 2.3 Personal pronouns.............................................................................. 65 2.4 Demonstratives................................................................................... 70 2.5 Noun Phrases...................................................................................... 75 2.5.1 Coordinating noun phrases....................................................... 75 2.5.2 Appositional noun phrases....................................................... 76 2.5.3 Intensifier phrase...................................................................... 77 v 3. Postpositions and postpositional phrases............................................... 78 3.1 Set 1 – Postpositions expressing modal outlook ................................ 78 3.1.1 Focus indices............................................................................ 78 3.1.2 Contrastive focus -te ................................................................ 79 3.1.3 Approximation -se ................................................................... 80 3.1.4 Distributive marker -po............................................................ 81 3.1.5 Diminutive -keke...................................................................... 81 3.1.6 Markers of epistemic judgement.............................................. 82 3.2 Set 2 – Postpositions relating one noun to another ............................ 85 3.2.1 Noun phrase marker/nominaliser -lu ....................................... 85 3.2.2 Comitative -tu .......................................................................... 86 3.3 Set 3 – Postpositions relating a noun to the clausal predicate............ 87 3.3.1 Locative -i, -fi........................................................................... 87 3.3.2 Source -fu................................................................................. 89 3.3.3 Goal -le .................................................................................... 90 3.3.4 Instrument -tu........................................................................... 92 3.3.5 Reason/purpose -fe................................................................... 93 3.4 Postpositional phrases........................................................................ 94 4. Verbs and verb phrases........................................................................... 98 4.1 Verb stems.......................................................................................... 98 4.1.1 Common verb stems ................................................................ 98 4.1.2 Compound verbs...................................................................... 99 4.1.3 Inherently singular and plural verbs....................................... 102 4.1.4 Impersonal verbs.................................................................... 104 4.1.5 Existential verbs..................................................................... 105 4.2 Verbal affixation.............................................................................. 106 4.2.1 Subject suffixes...................................................................... 108 4.2.2 Object suffixes....................................................................... 109 4.2.3
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Status of the Least Documented Language Families in the World
    Vol. 4 (2010), pp. 177-212 http://nflrc.hawaii.edu/ldc/ http://hdl.handle.net/10125/4478 The status of the least documented language families in the world Harald Hammarström Radboud Universiteit, Nijmegen and Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig This paper aims to list all known language families that are not yet extinct and all of whose member languages are very poorly documented, i.e., less than a sketch grammar’s worth of data has been collected. It explains what constitutes a valid family, what amount and kinds of documentary data are sufficient, when a language is considered extinct, and more. It is hoped that the survey will be useful in setting priorities for documenta- tion fieldwork, in particular for those documentation efforts whose underlying goal is to understand linguistic diversity. 1. InTroducTIon. There are several legitimate reasons for pursuing language documen- tation (cf. Krauss 2007 for a fuller discussion).1 Perhaps the most important reason is for the benefit of the speaker community itself (see Voort 2007 for some clear examples). Another reason is that it contributes to linguistic theory: if we understand the limits and distribution of diversity of the world’s languages, we can formulate and provide evidence for statements about the nature of language (Brenzinger 2007; Hyman 2003; Evans 2009; Harrison 2007). From the latter perspective, it is especially interesting to document lan- guages that are the most divergent from ones that are well-documented—in other words, those that belong to unrelated families. I have conducted a survey of the documentation of the language families of the world, and in this paper, I will list the least-documented ones.
    [Show full text]
  • Abstract of Counting Systems of Papua New Guinea and Oceania
    Abstract of http://www.uog.ac.pg/glec/thesis/ch1web/ABSTRACT.htm Abstract of Counting Systems of Papua New Guinea and Oceania by Glendon A. Lean In modern technological societies we take the existence of numbers and the act of counting for granted: they occur in most everyday activities. They are regarded as being sufficiently important to warrant their occupying a substantial part of the primary school curriculum. Most of us, however, would find it difficult to answer with any authority several basic questions about number and counting. For example, how and when did numbers arise in human cultures: are they relatively recent inventions or are they an ancient feature of language? Is counting an important part of all cultures or only of some? Do all cultures count in essentially the same ways? In English, for example, we use what is known as a base 10 counting system and this is true of other European languages. Indeed our view of counting and number tends to be very much a Eurocentric one and yet the large majority the languages spoken in the world - about 4500 - are not European in nature but are the languages of the indigenous peoples of the Pacific, Africa, and the Americas. If we take these into account we obtain a quite different picture of counting systems from that of the Eurocentric view. This study, which attempts to answer these questions, is the culmination of more than twenty years on the counting systems of the indigenous and largely unwritten languages of the Pacific region and it involved extensive fieldwork as well as the consultation of published and rare unpublished sources.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Speak Quechua? : a Study of Language Attitudes Among Native Quechua Speakers In
    Why Speak Quechua? : A Study of Language Attitudes among Native Quechua Speakers in Lima, Peru. A Senior Honors Thesis Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for graduation with research distinction in Linguistics in the undergraduate colleges of The Ohio State University by Nicole Holliday The Ohio State University June 2010 Project Advisor: Professor Donald Winford, Department of Linguistics Holliday 2 I. Introduction According to the U.S. State Department, Bureau of Western Hemisphere Affairs, there are presently 3.2 million Quechua speakers in Peru, which constitute approximately 16.5% of the total Peruvian population. As a result of the existence of a numerically prominent Quechua speaking population, the language is not presently classified as endangered in Peru. The 32 documented dialects of Quechua are considered as part of both an official language of Peru and a “lingua franca” in most regions of the Andes (Sherzer & Urban 1988, Lewis 2009). While the Peruvian government is supportive of the Quechua macrolanguage, “The State promotes the study and the knowledge of indigenous languages” (Article 83 of the Constitutional Assembly of Peru qtd. inVon Gleich 1994), many believe that with the advent of new technology and heavy cultural pressure to learn Spanish, Quechua will begin to fade into obscurity, just as the languages of Aymara and Kura have “lost their potency” in many parts of South America (Amastae 1989). At this point in time, there exists a great deal of data about how Quechua is used in Peru, but there is little data about language attitudes there, and even less about how native Quechua speakers view both their own language and how it relates to the more widely- spoken Spanish.
    [Show full text]
  • Exploring Material Culture Distributions in the Upper Sepik and Central New Guinea
    Gender, mobility and population history: exploring material culture distributions in the Upper Sepik and Central New Guinea by Andrew Fyfe, BA (Hons) Thesis submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The Discipline of Geographical and Environmental Studies The University of Adelaide November 2008 …..These practices, then, and others which I will speak of later, were borrowed by the Greeks from Egypt. This is not the case, however, with the Greek custom of making images of Hermes with the phallus erect; it was the Athenians who took this from the Pelasgians, and from the Athenians the custom spread to the rest of Greece. For just at the time when the Athenians were assuming Hellenic nationality, the Pelasgians joined them, and thus first came to be regarded as Greeks. Anyone will know what I mean if he is familiar with the mysteries of the Cabiri-rites which the men of Samothrace learned from the Pelasgians, who lived in that island before they moved to Attica, and communicated the mysteries to the Athenians. This will show that the Athenians were the first Greeks to make statues of Hermes with the erect phallus, and that they learned the practice from the Pelasgians…… Herodotus c.430 BC ii Table of contents Acknowledgements vii List of figures viii List of tables xi List of Appendices xii Abstract xiv Declaration xvi Section One 1. Introduction 2 1.1 The Upper Sepik-Central New Guinea Project 2 1.2 Lapita and the exploration of relationships between language and culture in Melanesia 3 1.3 The quantification of relationships between material culture and language on New Guinea’s north coast 6 1.4 Thesis objectives 9 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Language Classification in the Ethnologue and Its Consequences (Paper)
    Sarah E. Cornwell The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada Language Classification in The Ethnologue and its Consequences (Paper) Abstract: The Ethnologue is a widely used classificatory standard for the world’s 7000+ natural languages. However, the motives and processes used by The Ethnologue’s governing body, SIL International, have come under criticism by linguists. This paper investigates how The Ethnologue answers the question “What is a language?” through the theoretical lens presented by Bowker and Star in Sorting Things Out (1999) and presents some consequences of those classificatory decisions. 1. Introduction Language is central to human culture and experience. It is the central core of our communicative capacity, running through all media of communication. Due to this essential role, there is a need to classify and count languages and their speakers1. Governments need to communicate with citizens, libraries need to catalogue books by language, and search engines need to return webpages in the appropriate language for each searcher. For these reasons among others, there is a strong institutional need for a standardized classification structure and labelling system for languages. The most widespread current classificatory infrastructure for languages is based on The Ethnologue. This essay will critically evaluate The Ethnologue using the Foucauldian theory developed for investigating classification structures by Bowker and Star (1999) in Sorting Things Out: Classification and its Consequences. 2. The Ethnologue The Ethnologue is a catalogue of all the world’s languages. First compiled in 1951, The Ethnologue is currently in its 20th edition and contains descriptions of 7099 living languages (2017). Since 1997, The Ethnologue has been available freely online and widely accessible (Simons & Fennig, 2017).
    [Show full text]
  • The Languages of Melanesia: Quantifying the Level of Coverage
    Language Documentation & Conservation Special Publication No. 5 (December 2012) Melanesian Languages on the Edge of Asia: Challenges for the 21st Century, ed. by Nicholas Evans and Marian Klamer, pp. 13–33 http://nflrc.hawaii.edu/ldc/sp05/ 2 http://hdl.handle.net/10125/4559 The languages of Melanesia: Quantifying the level of coverage Harald Hammarström Max Plank Institute for Evolutionary Anthopology Sebastian Nordhoff Max Plank Institute for Evolutionary Anthopology The present paper assesses the state of grammatical description of the languages of the Melanesian region based on database of semi- automatically annotated aggregated bibliographical references. 150 years of language description in Melanesia has produced at least some grammatical information for almost half of the languages of Melanesia, almost evenly spread among coastal/non-coastal, Austronesian/non- Austronesian and isolates/large families. Nevertheless, only 15.4% of these languages have a grammar and another 18.7% have a grammar sketch. Compared to Eurasia, Africa and the Americas, the Papua- Austronesian region is the region with the largest number of poorly documented languages and the largest proportion of poorly documented languages. We conclude with some dicussion and remarks on the documentational challenge and its future prospects. 1. INTRODUCTION. We will take Melanesia to be the sub-region of Oceania extending from the Arafura Sea and Western Pacific in the west to Fiji in the east – see the map in figure 1.1 This region is home to no fewer than 1347 (1315 living + 32 recently extinct) attested indigenous languages as per the language/dialect divisions of Lewis (2009), with small adjustments and adding attested extinct languages given in table 1.
    [Show full text]
  • DEVELOPMENT in PAPUA NEW GUINEA: Various Meanings in the Context of Logging in West New Britain
    DEVELOPMENT IN PAPUA NEW GUINEA: various meanings in the context of logging in West New Britain Peter Nelson, B. A. (Hons. Anthropology), Grad. Dip. Ed. Submitted in fulfilment of a Master of Arts Degree by Research in the School of Australian and International Studies, Faculty of Arts, Deakin University, Victoria, Australia March 1999 iii TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS v PREFACE viii ONE Various Meanings Culture and world view 7 A villager's voice 14 Makapa 19 Development in the context of Logging 23 TWO Peoples of Pasismanua and development 35 Exchange 40 Environment and tradition in the Pasismanua region 49 Life in Melanesia 54 Areal cultures 63 The community 70 Governance and the community 72 A development debate 77 THREE Education 83 FOUR Human development: understanding the other 99 Notions of development: a new focusl04 Development and reciprocity 109 Self detennination 112 Sustainable and unsustainable 120 development Good governance 125 Labour and economy 128 Vision and culture 136 CONCLUSION 141 BmLIOGRAPHY 151 iv MAPS MAP I Rainforest opp. p.4 MAP 2 Towns and hamlets in the discussion opp. p.5 MAP 2(0) Dispersion o/main hamlets in Pasismanua opp. p.5 ILLUSTRATIONS FIGURE I Traditional integral agroforestry in opp. p.53 Melanesia APPENDIX List of technical expressions 164 v ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Many people have helped in the marshalling of information and in deepening my understanding of Melanesia. My Supervisor, Dr. David Wetherell, exercised patience through several drafts of the writing. I thank him for his help. A major mover in the consultation process with peoples of tropical forests is Hartrnut Holzknecht, through his association with the Resource Owner Involvement movement of the Forest Management and Planning Project in PNG.
    [Show full text]
  • A Grammar of the Dom Language a Papuan Language of Papua New Guinea
    A Grammar of the Dom Language A Papuan Language of Papua New Guinea TIDA Syuntaroˆ i Table of Contents Acknowledgements xiii Abbreviations xv Maps xvii Chapter 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Geographical and demographic background . 1 1.2 Socio-linguistic setting . 1 1.2.1 Tribes and clans . 3 1.2.2 Names and Naming . 4 1.3 Linguistic background . 5 1.3.1 Genetic relationships . 5 1.3.2 Typological profile . 6 1.3.3 Papuan context . 7 1.4 Previous work . 7 1.5 Present study . 8 Chapter 2 Phonology 9 2.1 Vowels . 9 2.1.1 Minimal pairs . 9 2.1.2 Lengthening . 9 2.1.3 /e/ . 9 2.1.4 [1] and /i/ insertion . 10 2.1.5 /i/ . 11 2.1.6 /o/ . 11 2.1.7 /u/ . 12 2.1.8 /a/ . 12 2.1.9 Sequence of vowels . 12 2.2 Consonants . 13 2.2.1 Minimal pairs . 13 2.2.2 Prenasalisation and gemination . 13 2.2.3 Obstruents . 14 2.2.3.1 /p/ . 14 2.2.3.2 /b/ . 14 2.2.3.3 /k/ . 14 2.2.3.4 /g/ . 14 ii Table of Contents 2.2.3.5 /t/ . 15 2.2.3.6 /d/ . 15 2.2.3.7 /s/ . 15 2.2.3.8 /r/ . 15 2.2.3.9 /l/ and /L/........................... 16 2.2.3.10 /s/, /t/ and /l/ . 17 2.2.3.11 /c/ and /j/ . 18 2.2.4 Nasals . 19 2.2.4.1 /n/ . 19 2.2.4.2 /m/ .
    [Show full text]
  • Languages of Harappa
    •§ Michael Witzel Feb. 17, 2000 135 k The Languages of Harappa § 1. The riddle of the Indus script and language Each year, or as it seems, by now every other month, we see a new decipherment of the Indus script. Beyond G. Possehl's fifty-odd examples (Possehl 1996), there must be some dozens more, by now frequently found on the internet. However, as is well known, neither is the script itself well understood nor do we know on which language it is based and for which languages it has been used. In this paper, I am not going to add myself to the long list of failures of decipherment of the script. Instead, I think we should first prepare the ground for such undertaking by investigating the peculiarities of the script itself, a task that has not been carried systematically enough (Wells 1998). Secondly, we should take a much closer look at the various sources which may indicate which languages were spoken in the core areas of the Indus civilization, in the Greater Panjab and in Sindh-Baluchistan. During the past few decades, the language underlying the Indus script has almost universally been taken as Proto-Dravidian (leaving aside such unlikely explanations as Sanskrit, Sumerian, etc., see Possehl 1996). This means a form of reconstructed, early Dravidian that precedes --by some two thousand years or more-- that of the Sangam (Cakam) texts which were composed in archaic Tamil around the beginning of our era. The tacit presupposition has been that the by and large South Indian Dravidian languages preceded the various dialects of Old Indo-Aryan (OIA) in the Panjab and Sindh.
    [Show full text]
  • Wipi Grammar Essentials
    1 Wipi Grammar Essentials Written by Anne Dondorp and Jae-Wook Shim, January 1997 Formatted for online publishing by Ruth Wester, November 2013 2 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................ 7 1.1 General Information ................................................................................................................................... 7 1.2 Conventions Used ....................................................................................................................................... 8 1.3 Abbreviations ............................................................................................................................................. 8 2. PHONOLOGICAL DESCRIPTION ............................................................................................. 10 2.1 Tentative Orthography ............................................................................................................................. 10 2.2 Morphophonemics ................................................................................................................................... 11 2.2.1 Epenthesis ................................................................................................................................................ 11 2.2.2 Deletion .................................................................................................................................................... 11 2.2.3 Assimilation .............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Towards a Holistic Understanding of Rural Livelihood Systems: the Case of the Bine, Western Province, Papua New Guinea
    Lincoln University Digital Thesis Copyright Statement The digital copy of this thesis is protected by the Copyright Act 1994 (New Zealand). This thesis may be consulted by you, provided you comply with the provisions of the Act and the following conditions of use: you will use the copy only for the purposes of research or private study you will recognise the author's right to be identified as the author of the thesis and due acknowledgement will be made to the author where appropriate you will obtain the author's permission before publishing any material from the thesis. Towards a Holistic Understanding of Rural Livelihood Systems: The Case of the Bine, Western Province, Papua New Guinea A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy at Lincoln University by Modowa Trevor Gumoi Lincoln University 2010 Declaration To the best of my knowledge, this work has not previously been submitted, either in whole or in part for a degree at this or any other university. This thesis is my original work and contains no materials previously published or written by any other persons. All source material used has been explicitly identified and acknowledged. Modowa Trevor Gumoi ii Abstract of a thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Abstract Towards a Holistic Understanding of Rural Livelihood Systems: The Case of the Bine, Western Province, Papua New Guinea by Modowa Trevor Gumoi This exploratory village-level case study sought to gain in-depth insights and a holistic understanding into the livelihood system of the rural Bine community in Papua New Guinea.
    [Show full text]
  • Languages of the World--Indo-Pacific Fascicle Eight
    REPORT RESUMES ED 010 367 48 LANGUAGES OF THE WORLD--INDO-PACIFIC FASCICLE EIGHT. ST- VOEGELI1, C.F. VOEGELIN, FLORENCE M. INDIANA UNIV., BLOOMINGTON REPORT NUMBER NDEA- VI -63 -20 PUB DATE. APR 66 CONTRACT OEC-SAE-9480 FURS PRICE MF-$Q.18HC-52.80 70P. ANTHROPOLOGICAL LINGUISTICS, 8(4)/1-64, APRIL 1966 DESCRIPTORS- *LANGUAGES, *INDO PACIFIC LANGUAGES, ARCHIVES OF LANGUAGES OF THE WORLD, BLOOMINGTON, INDIANA THIS REPORT DESCRIBES SOME OF THE LANGUAGES AND LANGUAGE FAMILIES OF THE SOUTH AND SOUTHEAST ASIA REGIONS OF THE INDO-PACIFIC AREA. THE LANGUAGE FAMILIES DISCUSSED WERE JAKUM, SAKAI, SEMANG, PALAUNG-WA (SALWEEN), MUNDA, AND DRAVIDIAN. OTHER LANGUAGES DISCUSSED WERE ANDAMANESE, N/COBAnESE, KHASI, NAHALI, AND BCRUSHASKI. (THE REPORT IS PART OF A SERIES, ED 010 350 TO ED 010 367.) (JK) +.0 U. S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, EDUCATION AND WELFARE b D Office of Education tr's This document has been reproduced exactlyas received from the S.,4E" L es, C=4.) person or organiz3t1on originating It. Points of view or opinions T--I stated do not nocessart- represent official °dice of Edumdion poeWon or policy. AnthropologicalLinguistics Volume 8 Number 4 April 116 6 LANGUAGES OF THE WORLD: INDO- PACIFIC FASCICLE EIGHT A Publication of the ARCHIVES OFLANGUAGES OF THEWORLD Anthropology Department Indiana University ANTHROPOLOGICAL LINGUISTICS is designed primarily, but not exclusively, for the immediate publication of data-oriented papers for which attestation is available in the form oftape recordings on deposit in the Archives of Languages of the World.
    [Show full text]