DOCSLIB.ORG

View, CMM-I-2126

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
View, CMM-I-2126 SYSTEMATICS AND PALEOECOLOGY OF MIOCENE PORTUNID AND CANCRID DECAPOD FOSSILS FROM THE ST. MARYS FORMATION, MARYLAND A thesis submitted To Kent State University in partial Fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Science by Heedar Bahman August, 2018 © Copyright All rights reserved Except for previously published materials Thesis written by Heedar Bahman B.S., Kuwait University, 2011 M.S., Kent State University, 2018 Approved by Rodney M. Feldmann , Ph.D., Advisor Daniel Holm , Ph.D., Chair, Department of Geology James L. Blank , Ph.D., Dean, College of Arts and Sciences TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................................... iii LIST OF FIGURES ........................................................................................................... iv LIST OF TABLES ............................................................................................................ vii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ............................................................................................... viii SUMMARY .........................................................................................................................1 INTRODUCTION ...............................................................................................................2 GEOLOGICAL SETTING ..................................................................................................5 METHODS ..........................................................................................................................7 SYSTEMATIC PALEONTOLOGY ...................................................................................8 DISCUSSION ....................................................................................................................27 CONCLUSIONS................................................................................................................32 APPENDIX ........................................................................................................................33 FIGURES ...........................................................................................................................34 REFERENCES ..................................................................................................................52 iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure Page 1 n. sp. 1, dorsal view, CMM-I-2126 ........................................................................34 2 n. sp. 1, dorsal view, CMM-I-4310 ........................................................................34 3 n. sp. 1, ventral view, CMM-I-4310 ......................................................................34 4 n. sp. 1, dorsal view, CMM-I-4305 ........................................................................35 5 n. sp. 1, dorsal view, CMM-I-2987 ........................................................................35 6 n. sp. 1, dorsal view, CMM-I-3833 ........................................................................35 7 n. sp. 1, dorsal view, CMM-I-4306 ........................................................................36 8 n. sp. 1, dorsal view, CMM-I-3657 ........................................................................36 9 n. sp. 1, dorsal view, CMM-I-4307 ........................................................................36 10 n. sp. 1, ventral view, CMM-I-4307 ......................................................................37 11 n. sp. 1, dorsal view, CMM-I-3806 ........................................................................37 12 n. sp. 1, dorsal view, CMM-I-3970 ........................................................................37 13 n. sp. 1, dorsal view, CMM-I-3796 ........................................................................38 14 n. sp. 1, dorsal view, CMM-I-4311 ........................................................................38 15 n. sp. 1, dorsal view, CMM-I-2863 ........................................................................38 16 n. sp. 1, dorsal view, CMM-I-3954 ........................................................................39 17 n. sp. 1, ventral view, CMM-I-3954 ......................................................................39 18 n. sp. 1, dorsal view, CMM-I-4309B .....................................................................39 iv 19 n. sp. 1, dorsal view, CMM-I-4309A .....................................................................40 20 n. sp. 1, dorsal view, CMM-I-4308 ........................................................................40 21 n. sp. 1, dorsal view, CMM-I-4312 ........................................................................40 22 Necronectes drydeni, dorsal view, CMM-I-231 ....................................................41 23 Necronectes drydeni, ventral view, CMM-I-231 ...................................................41 24 Necronectes drydeni, dorsal view, CMM-I-4317 ..................................................41 25 Necronectes drydeni, ventral view, CMM-I-4317 .................................................42 26 Necronectes drydeni, dorsal view, CMM-I-4313 ..................................................42 27 Necronectes drydeni, ventral view, CMM-I-4313 .................................................42 28 Necronectes drydeni, dorsal view, CMM-I-4318 ..................................................43 29 Necronectes drydeni, ventral view, CMM-I-4318 .................................................43 30 Necronectes drydeni, dorsal view, CMM-I-4320 ..................................................43 31 Necronectes drydeni, ventral view, CMM-I-4320 .................................................44 32 Necronectes drydeni, dorsal view, CMM-I-4319 ..................................................44 33 Necronectes drydeni, ventral view, CMM-I-4319 .................................................44 34 Necronectes drydeni, dorsal view, CMM-I-4314 ..................................................44 35 Necronectes drydeni, ventral view, CMM-I-4314 .................................................45 36 Necronectes drydeni, dorsal view, CMM-I-3920 ..................................................45 37 Necronectes drydeni, ventral view, CMM-I-3920 .................................................45 38 Necronectes drydeni, dorsal view, CMM-I-4316 ..................................................46 v 39 Necronectes drydeni, ventral view, CMM-I-4316 .................................................46 40 Necronectes drydeni, dorsal view, CMM-I-4043 ..................................................46 41 Necronectes drydeni, dorsal view, CMM-I-2941 ..................................................47 42 Necronectes drydeni, ventral view, CMM-I-2941 .................................................47 43 Necronectes drydeni, dorsal view, CMM-I-3931 ..................................................47 44 Necronectes drydeni, ventral view, CMM-I-3931 .................................................47 45 Necronectes drydeni, dorsal view, CMM-I-3996 ..................................................48 46 Necronectes drydeni, ventral view, CMM-I-3996 .................................................48 47 Cancer borealis, dorsal view, CMM-I-2796 .........................................................48 48 Cancer irroratus, dorsal view, CMM-I-2616 ........................................................48 49 n. sp. 2, dorsal view, barnacles attached to the left side of the carpace, CMM-I-4014 ..........................................................................................................49 50 n. sp. 2, ventral view, showing the left cheliped, CMM-I4014 .............................49 51 Callinectes sapidus., dorsal view, CMM-I-3688 ...................................................50 52 Callinectes sapidus, ventral view, female pleon, CMM-I-3688 ............................50 53 Callinectes sapidus., dorsal view, CMM-I-3688 ...................................................51 54 Calinectes sapidus., ventral view, immature female pleon, CMM-I-3688 ............51 vi LIST OF TABLES Table Page 1 Measurements for n. sp. 1 ......................................................................................33 2 Measurements for Necronectes drydeni .................................................................33 vii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank all those who helped, supported and guided me through my master’s program and research. First and foremost I would like to thank my advisor Rodney Feldmann for guiding me through my thesis research, helping me on a personal level when I first arrived to the United States, supporting me emotionally and answering every question I had. He provided me with knowledge and means for success. I would like to thank John Nance from Calvert Marine Museum Solomons, Maryland for providing the fossils. Special thanks goes to my committee members Carrie Schweitzer and Neil Wells for taking the time to teach me. I would also like to thank the administrative secretary of Geology Department, Kelly Thomasson. My utmost gratitude goes to my mother and wife for supporting me and being part of my journey in the last two years. viii SUMMARY A collection of decapod fossils from the Miocene St. Marys Formation, Little Cove Point Member, was examined. Three different genera were recognized, Necronectes A. Milne Edwards, 1881, Callinectes Stimpson, 1860, and Cancer Linnaeus, 1758, comprising 6 species. Cancer included 4 species, Cancer irroratus Say,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Classification of Living and Fossil Genera of Decapod Crustaceans
    RAFFLES BULLETIN OF ZOOLOGY 2009 Supplement No. 21: 1–109 Date of Publication: 15 Sep.2009 © National University of Singapore A CLASSIFICATION OF LIVING AND FOSSIL GENERA OF DECAPOD CRUSTACEANS Sammy De Grave1, N. Dean Pentcheff 2, Shane T. Ahyong3, Tin-Yam Chan4, Keith A. Crandall5, Peter C. Dworschak6, Darryl L. Felder7, Rodney M. Feldmann8, Charles H. J. M. Fransen9, Laura Y. D. Goulding1, Rafael Lemaitre10, Martyn E. Y. Low11, Joel W. Martin2, Peter K. L. Ng11, Carrie E. Schweitzer12, S. H. Tan11, Dale Tshudy13, Regina Wetzer2 1Oxford University Museum of Natural History, Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3PW, United Kingdom [email protected] [email protected] 2Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, 900 Exposition Blvd., Los Angeles, CA 90007 United States of America [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] 3Marine Biodiversity and Biosecurity, NIWA, Private Bag 14901, Kilbirnie Wellington, New Zealand [email protected] 4Institute of Marine Biology, National Taiwan Ocean University, Keelung 20224, Taiwan, Republic of China [email protected] 5Department of Biology and Monte L. Bean Life Science Museum, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602 United States of America [email protected] 6Dritte Zoologische Abteilung, Naturhistorisches Museum, Wien, Austria [email protected] 7Department of Biology, University of Louisiana, Lafayette, LA 70504 United States of America [email protected] 8Department of Geology, Kent State University, Kent, OH 44242 United States of America [email protected] 9Nationaal Natuurhistorisch Museum, P. O. Box 9517, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands [email protected] 10Invertebrate Zoology, Smithsonian Institution, National Museum of Natural History, 10th and Constitution Avenue, Washington, DC 20560 United States of America [email protected] 11Department of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, Science Drive 4, Singapore 117543 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] 12Department of Geology, Kent State University Stark Campus, 6000 Frank Ave.
    [Show full text]
  • A Revision of the Palaeocorystoidea and the Phylogeny of Raninoidian Crabs (Crustacea, Decapoda, Brachyura, Podotremata)
    Zootaxa 3215: 1–216 (2012) ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Monograph ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2012 · Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) ZOOTAXA 3215 A revision of the Palaeocorystoidea and the phylogeny of raninoidian crabs (Crustacea, Decapoda, Brachyura, Podotremata) BARRY W.M. VAN BAKEL1, 6, DANIÈLE GUINOT2, PEDRO ARTAL3, RENÉ H.B. FRAAIJE4 & JOHN W.M. JAGT5 1 Oertijdmuseum De Groene Poort, Bosscheweg 80, NL–5283 WB Boxtel, the Netherlands; and Nederlands Centrum voor Biodiver- siteit [Naturalis], P.O. Box 9517, NL–2300 RA Leiden, the Netherlands E-mail: [email protected] 2 Département Milieux et peuplements aquatiques, Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle, 61 rue Buffon, CP 53, F–75231 Paris Cedex 5, France E-mail: [email protected] 3 Museo Geológico del Seminario de Barcelona, Diputación 231, E–08007 Barcelona, Spain E-mail: [email protected] 4 Oertijdmuseum De Groene Poort, Bosscheweg 80, NL–5283 WB Boxtel, the Netherlands E-mail: [email protected] 5 Natuurhistorisch Museum Maastricht, de Bosquetplein 6–7, NL–6211 KJ Maastricht, the Netherlands E-mail: [email protected] 6 Corresponding author Magnolia Press Auckland, New Zealand Accepted by P. Castro: 2 Dec. 2011; published: 29 Feb. 2012 BARRY W.M. VAN BAKEL, DANIÈLE GUINOT, PEDRO ARTAL, RENÉ H.B. FRAAIJE & JOHN W.M. JAGT A revision of the Palaeocorystoidea and the phylogeny of raninoidian crabs (Crustacea, Deca- poda, Brachyura, Podotremata) (Zootaxa 3215) 216 pp.; 30 cm. 29 Feb. 2012 ISBN 978-1-86977-873-6 (paperback) ISBN 978-1-86977-874-3 (Online edition) FIRST PUBLISHED IN 2012 BY Magnolia Press P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • Crustacea, Decapoda, Brachyura) Danièle Guinot
    New hypotheses concerning the earliest brachyurans (Crustacea, Decapoda, Brachyura) Danièle Guinot To cite this version: Danièle Guinot. New hypotheses concerning the earliest brachyurans (Crustacea, Decapoda, Brachyura). Geodiversitas, Museum National d’Histoire Naturelle Paris, 2019, 41 (1), pp.747. 10.5252/geodiversitas2019v41a22. hal-02408863 HAL Id: hal-02408863 https://hal.sorbonne-universite.fr/hal-02408863 Submitted on 13 Dec 2019 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. 1 Changer fig. 19 initiale Inverser les figs 15-16 New hypotheses concerning the earliest brachyurans (Crustacea, Decapoda, Brachyura) Danièle GUINOT ISYEB (CNRS, MNHN, EPHE, Sorbonne Université), Institut Systématique Évolution Biodiversité, Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, case postale 53, 57 rue Cuvier, F-75231 Paris cedex 05 (France) [email protected] An epistemological obstacle will encrust any knowledge that is not questioned. Intellectual habits that were once useful and healthy can, in the long run, hamper research Gaston Bachelard, The Formation of the Scientific
    [Show full text]
  • Decapode.Pdf
    We are pleased and honored to welcome at the Paléospace Museum of Villers-sur-Mer the “6th Symposium on Mesozoic and Cenozoic Decapod Crustaceans”. Villers-sur-Mer is a place universally known by specialists and amateurs of palaeontology due to its famous Vaches Noires cliffs. Villers-sur-Mer has also the distinction of being the only French seaside resort located on the Greenwich Meridian line. The Paléospace is a Museum funded in 2011 with the label Musée de France. Three main animations linked to the Time are presented: palaeontology, astronomy and nature with the neighbouring marsh. The museum is in a constant evolution. For instance, an exhibition specially dedicated to dinosaurs was opened two years ago and a planetarium will open next summer. Every year a very high quality temporary exhibition takes place during the summer period with very numerous animations during all the year. The Paléospace does not stop progressing in term of visitors (56 868 in 2015) and its notoriety is universally recognized both by the other museums as by the scientific community. We are very proud of these unexpected results. We thank the dynamism and the professionalism of the Paléospace team which is at the origin of this very great success. We wish you a very good stay at Villers-sur-Mer, a beautiful visit of the Paléospace and especially an excellent congress. Jean-Paul Durand, Mayor and President of Paléospace MOT DU MAIRE DE VILLERS-SUR-MER Nous sommes très heureux et très honorés d’accueillir à Villers-sur-Mer, le « 6e Symposium on Mesozoic and Cenozoic Decapod Crustaceans » dans le cadre du Paléospace.
    [Show full text]
  • Part I. an Annotated Checklist of Extant Brachyuran Crabs of the World
    THE RAFFLES BULLETIN OF ZOOLOGY 2008 17: 1–286 Date of Publication: 31 Jan.2008 © National University of Singapore SYSTEMA BRACHYURORUM: PART I. AN ANNOTATED CHECKLIST OF EXTANT BRACHYURAN CRABS OF THE WORLD Peter K. L. Ng Raffles Museum of Biodiversity Research, Department of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, Kent Ridge, Singapore 119260, Republic of Singapore Email: [email protected] Danièle Guinot Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle, Département Milieux et peuplements aquatiques, 61 rue Buffon, 75005 Paris, France Email: [email protected] Peter J. F. Davie Queensland Museum, PO Box 3300, South Brisbane, Queensland, Australia Email: [email protected] ABSTRACT. – An annotated checklist of the extant brachyuran crabs of the world is presented for the first time. Over 10,500 names are treated including 6,793 valid species and subspecies (with 1,907 primary synonyms), 1,271 genera and subgenera (with 393 primary synonyms), 93 families and 38 superfamilies. Nomenclatural and taxonomic problems are reviewed in detail, and many resolved. Detailed notes and references are provided where necessary. The constitution of a large number of families and superfamilies is discussed in detail, with the positions of some taxa rearranged in an attempt to form a stable base for future taxonomic studies. This is the first time the nomenclature of any large group of decapod crustaceans has been examined in such detail. KEY WORDS. – Annotated checklist, crabs of the world, Brachyura, systematics, nomenclature. CONTENTS Preamble .................................................................................. 3 Family Cymonomidae .......................................... 32 Caveats and acknowledgements ............................................... 5 Family Phyllotymolinidae .................................... 32 Introduction .............................................................................. 6 Superfamily DROMIOIDEA ..................................... 33 The higher classification of the Brachyura ........................
    [Show full text]
  • (Stomatopoda: Decapoda) Associated with the Deepwater
    Revista de Biología Tropical ISSN: 0034-7744 [email protected] Universidad de Costa Rica Costa Rica Wehrtmann, Ingo S.; Echeverría-Sáenz, Silvia Crustacean fauna (Stomatopoda: Decapoda) associated with the deepwater fishery of Heterocarpus vicarius (Decapoda: Pandalidae) along the Pacific coast of Costa Rica Revista de Biología Tropical, vol. 55, núm. 1, 2007, pp. 121-130 Universidad de Costa Rica San Pedro de Montes de Oca, Costa Rica Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=44909916 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative Crustacean fauna (Stomatopoda: Decapoda) associated with the deepwater fishery of Heterocarpus vicarius (Decapoda: Pandalidae) along the Pacific coast of Costa Rica Ingo S. Wehrtmann 1,2,3 & Silvia Echeverría-Sáenz 1 1 Escuela de Biología, 2 Museo de Zoología y 3 Centro de Investigaciones en Ciencias del Mar y Limnología (CIMAR), Universidad de Costa Rica, 2060 San José, Costa Rica; [email protected] Received 11-X-2005. Corrected 08-VIII-2006. Accepted 16-III-2007. Abstract: Commercial bottom trawling is a successful and commonly used method to catch marine shrimps. However, the shrimp fishing gears are poorly selective, and in addition to the target species they catch and retain large quantities of non-target species (bycatch). This study presents data concerning species composition and depth distribution of the crustacean fauna (stomatopods and decapods) associated with Heterocarpus vicarius catches from Pacific Costa Rica.
    [Show full text]
  • ICES Marine Science Symposia
    ICES mar. Sei. Symp., 199: 189-199. 1995 Distribution and abundance of molluscs and decapod crustaceans in trawl samples from the Galician Shelf (NW Spain) A. C. Farina and F. J. Pereiro Farina, A. C., and Pereiro, F. J. 1995. Distribution and abundance of molluscs and decapod crustaceans in trawl samples from the Galician Shelf (NW Spain). - ICES mar. Sei. Symp., 199: 189-199. This study presents the community composition and structure of molluscs and decapod crustaceans from trawl samples taken on the Galician Shelf in Northwest Spain. Spatial and temporal distribution, as well as the biomass and density of the main species, are presented in relation to depth and substrate type. A. C. Farina: Instituto Espanol Oceanografia, Apdo 130, 15080 La Coruna, Spain. F. J. Pereiro: Instituto Espanol Oceanografia, Apdo 1552, 36280 Vigo, Spain [tel: (+34) 98120 53 62, fax: (+34) 981 229077], Introduction with recruitment to the area (in the autumn) and the spawning season of the majority of the demersal and Two main groups of invertebrates (crustaceans and mol­ benthic species (in the spring). A stratified sampling luscs) are caught when trawling for fish on the Galician design was used and selection of the trawls was random. Shelf, which lies off northwestern Spain, reaching a The area is divided into three geographic sectors (Mino depth of 500 m 30 km from the coast along its southern to Finisterre, Finisterre to Estaca, and Estaca to Riba- part and broadening to 65 km from the coast in the deo), and each sector is divided into two strata by depth northern part.
    [Show full text]
  • Crustáceos Decápodos (Arthropoda: Crustacea: Decapoda) De Aguas Profundas Del Pacífico Mexicano: Lista De Especies Y Material Recolectado Durante El Proyecto TALUD
    Crustáceos decápodos (Arthropoda: Crustacea: Decapoda) de aguas profundas del Pacífico mexicano: lista de especies y material recolectado durante el proyecto TALUD Michel E. Hendrickx1 INTRODUCCIÓN Los crustáceos decápodos son organismos omnipresentes en los mares y océanos de la Tierra y han sido encontrados desde la zona intermareal hasta las profundida- des abisales. Contienen los muy conocidos cangrejos, los camarones, los langosti- nos y las langostas. Algunas especies son particularmente llamativas por su forma y sus colores. El grupo de los crustáceos decápodos corresponde a una orden dentro del filo de los Arthropoda (Subfilo Crustacea: Orden Decapoda). Se caracteriza por tener un caparazón generalmente bien calcificado y (salvo algunas excepciones) 10 pares de “patas” (o pereiópodos) que sirven como apéndices prensiles o para desplazarse. Contiene unas 18000 especies y está formado por dos subórdenes y 10 infraordenes. El primer suborden, los Dendrobranchiata, corresponde, entre otras especies, a los camarones clásicos (e.g., los Penaeidae que se pescan en las costas de México). Los Pleocyemata, el segundo suborden de decápodos, contiene todas las demás especies de camarones, langostinos, langostas y cangrejos reparti- das entre 10 infraordenes (Stenopodidea, Caridea, Astacidea, Glypheidea, Axiidea, 1 Laboratorio de Invertebrados Bentónicos, Instituto de Ciencias del Mar y Limnología, Uni- dad Académica Mazatlán, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Joel Montes Cama- rena s/n, Mazatlán 82040, Sinaloa, México. Correo-e: [email protected]. 283 Gebiidea, Achelata, Polychelida, Anomura y Brachyura) (De Grave et al. 2009). De estos, ocho tienen representantes en aguas profundas (Martin y Davis 2001, Brusca y Brusca 2002). Los Glypheidae, con solamente dos especies vivas, no tienen representantes en aguas profundas.
    [Show full text]
  • The Complete Larval Development of the Edible Crab, Cancer Setosus Molina and Observations on the Prezoeal and Title First Zoeal Stages of C
    The Complete Larval Development of the Edible Crab, Cancer setosus Molina and Observations on the Prezoeal and Title First zoeal Stages of C. coronatus Molina (Decapoda: Brachyura, Cancridae) (With 19 Text-figures and 2 Tables) Author(s) QUINTANA, Rodolfo; SAELZER, Hugo Citation 北海道大學理學部紀要, 24(4), 267-303 Issue Date 1986-10 Doc URL http://hdl.handle.net/2115/27699 Type bulletin (article) File Information 24(4)_P267-303.pdf Instructions for use Hokkaido University Collection of Scholarly and Academic Papers : HUSCAP The Complete Larval Development of the Edible Crab, Cancer setosus Molina and Observations on the Prezoeal and First zoeal Stages of C. coronatus Molina (Decapoda: Brachyura, Cancridae) By Rodolfo Quintana Zoological Institute, Faculty of Science, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060, Japan and Hu~o Saelzer Departamento de Oceanologia, Universidad de Concepcion, Casilla 2407, Concepcion, Chile (With 19 Text-figures and 2 Tables) Introduction Four cancrid species occur along the western coasts of South America. Their latitudinal distribution has been reviewed by Nations (1975), and more recently by Brattstrom and Johanssen (1983), indicating a more southerly distribution for three of these species along the Chilean coasts (Fig. 1). Cancer setosus Molina is a littoral species occurring from Guayaquil, Ecuador to Taitao, Chile in depths ca 45 m and C. coronatus Molina is distributed from Ancon, Peru to Picton Channel, Chile (Retamal, 1981; Brattstrom and Johanssen, op. cit.). Together with the third species, C. edwardsi Bell, C. setosus is also the object of local fisheries in coastal waters. The total landings for both species in 1985 were 3, 187 ton (439 for the VIII Region), indicating 15.3 per cent of total landings for edible crusta­ cean in Chile.
    [Show full text]
  • Decapoda, Brachyura
    APLICACIÓN DE TÉCNICAS MORFOLÓGICAS Y MOLECULARES EN LA IDENTIFICACIÓN DE LA MEGALOPA de Decápodos Braquiuros de la Península Ibérica bérica I enínsula P raquiuros de la raquiuros B ecápodos D de APLICACIÓN DE TÉCNICAS MORFOLÓGICAS Y MOLECULARES EN LA IDENTIFICACIÓN DE LA MEGALOPA LA DE IDENTIFICACIÓN EN LA Y MOLECULARES MORFOLÓGICAS TÉCNICAS DE APLICACIÓN Herrero - MEGALOPA “big eyes” Leach 1793 Elena Marco Elena Marco-Herrero Programa de Doctorado en Biodiversidad y Biología Evolutiva Rd. 99/2011 Tesis Doctoral, Valencia 2015 Programa de Doctorado en Biodiversidad y Biología Evolutiva Rd. 99/2011 APLICACIÓN DE TÉCNICAS MORFOLÓGICAS Y MOLECULARES EN LA IDENTIFICACIÓN DE LA MEGALOPA DE DECÁPODOS BRAQUIUROS DE LA PENÍNSULA IBÉRICA TESIS DOCTORAL Elena Marco-Herrero Valencia, septiembre 2015 Directores José Antonio Cuesta Mariscal / Ferran Palero Pastor Tutor Álvaro Peña Cantero Als naninets AGRADECIMIENTOS-AGRAÏMENTS Colaboración y ayuda prestada por diferentes instituciones: - Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación (actual Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad) por la concesión de una Beca de Formación de Personal Investigador FPI (BES-2010- 033297) en el marco del proyecto: Aplicación de técnicas morfológicas y moleculares en la identificación de estados larvarios planctónicos de decápodos braquiuros ibéricos (CGL2009-11225) - Departamento de Ecología y Gestión Costera del Instituto de Ciencias Marinas de Andalucía (ICMAN-CSIC) - Club Náutico del Puerto de Santa María - Centro Andaluz de Ciencias y Tecnologías Marinas (CACYTMAR) - Instituto Español de Oceanografía (IEO), Centros de Mallorca y Cádiz - Institut de Ciències del Mar (ICM-CSIC) de Barcelona - Institut de Recerca i Tecnología Agroalimentàries (IRTA) de Tarragona - Centre d’Estudis Avançats de Blanes (CEAB) de Girona - Universidad de Málaga - Natural History Museum of London - Stazione Zoologica Anton Dohrn di Napoli (SZN) - Universitat de Barcelona AGRAÏSC – AGRADEZCO En primer lugar quisiera agradecer a mis directores, el Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Tarawa Terrace Reported Depth to Water
    Analyses of Groundwater Flow, Contaminant Fate and Transport, and Distribution of Drinking Water at Tarawa Terrace and Vicinity, U.S. Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune, North Carolina: Historical Reconstruction and Present-Day Conditions Chapter C: Simulation of Groundwater Flow TT-45 TT-29 TT-28 ABC One-Hour TT-30 Cleaners TT-27 TT-55 TT-26 TT-25 TT-53 TT-23 TT-67 TT-52 TT-31 STT-39 TT-54 Jacksonville 17 Tarawa Terrace 53 Piney Green ONSLOW 1105 24 COUNTY New 172 U.S. Marine Verona Corps Base Camp Lejeune 17 River Dixon 50 172 Sneads 210 Ferry Atlantic Ocean Wilmington 70 miles Holly Ridge ATSDR health study 1,000 Well TT-26 Well TT-23 100 Well TT-25 Finished water from water treatment plant 10 Well TT-54 Maximum contaminant level Well TT-67 1 Well TT-31 0.1 Finished water 0.01 sample from water PCE CONCENTRATION, IN MICROGRAMS PER LITER treatment plant 0.001 Jan Jan Jan Jan Jan Jan Jan Jan Jan Jan 1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 Atlanta, Georgia– November 2007 Front cover: Historical reconstruction process using data, information sources, and water-modeling techniques to estimate historical exposures Maps: U.S. Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune, North Carolina; Tarawa Terrace area showing historical water-supply wells and site of ABC One-Hour Cleaners Photographs on left: Ground storage tank STT-39 and four high-lift pumps used to deliver finished water from tank STT-39 to Tarawa Terrace water-distribution system Photograph on right: Equipment used to measure flow and pressure at a hydrant during field test of the present-day (2004) water-distribution system Graph: Reconstructed historical concentrations of tetrachloroethylene (PCE) at selected water-supply wells and in finished water at Tarawa Terrace water treatment plant Analyses of Groundwater Flow, Contaminant Fate and Transport, and Distribution of Drinking Water at Tarawa Terrace and Vicinity, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Localities for Eutrephoceras Sloani in North Cookanum
    EUTREPHOCERAS (NAUTILOIDEA) FROM THE PALEOCENE BEAUFORT FORMATION OF NORTH CAROLINA RICHARD H. BAILEY NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY, BOSTON, MASS. ABSTRACT characteristics for separation of species seem Well preserved specimens of Eutre­ to be conch shape and suture pattern. Speci­ phoceras sloani Rceside, collected from a mens of Eutrephoceras frequently have been recently exposed outcrop of the Paleocene subjected to post-depositional compression, Beaufort Formation in east-central North which greatly distorts the conch shape, and Carolina, represent the first reported Paleo­ complicates the separation of species. Detail­ cene nautiloids from Coastal Plain strata of ed consideration of suture patterns adds North Carolina. This species was formerly objectivity to the rather general comparisons known only from the Paleocene Black Mingo that have been made among species of Formation in eastern South Carolina, about Eutrephoceras in the past. All of the suture 280 km southwest of the North Carolina patterns (text fig. 5) used for species com­ Paleocene outcrops. The North Carolina parisons were taken from type specimens. Most of these suture patterns have not been specimens allow clarification and elaboration illustrated and compared graphically. of Reeside's original description. STRATIGRAPHY INTRODUCTION The new North Carolina outcrop consists Fossil nautiloids are generally rare m of 1.4 m of Paleocene strata which is dis- Paleocene strata of the Atlantic Coastal Plain. This scarcity of nautiloid specimens PA. probably results in part from a rather limited area of Paleocene outcrop; however, eco­ logical factors may also be important. A recently exposed Paleocene outcrop in east-central North Carolina yielded well preserved nautiloid specimens. These nauti­ loids, identified in this paper as Eutrepho­ ceras sloani Reeside, represent the first reported Paleocene cephalopods from North Carolina.
    [Show full text]