DOCSLIB.ORG

MARINE ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION COMMITTEE 75Th

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

E MARINE ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION MEPC 75/INF.23 COMMITTEE 24 January 2020 75th session ENGLISH ONLY Agenda item 8 Pre-session public release: ☒ FOLLOW-UP WORK EMANATING FROM THE ACTION PLAN TO ADDRESS MARINE PLASTIC LITTER FROM SHIPS Progress report of the GESAMP Working Group on Sea-based Sources of Marine Litter Note by the Secretariat SUMMARY Executive summary: This document sets out, in its annex, a first, interim report of the GESAMP Working Group on Sea-based Sources of Marine Litter (WG 43). An accompanying progress report on the work of the Group is provided in document MEPC 75/8/5. Strategic direction, if 4 applicable: Output: 4.3 Action to be taken: Paragraph 3 Related documents: MEPC 74/18 and MEPC 75/8/5 Introduction 1 At its seventy-fourth session, the Committee noted the recent establishment of the GESAMP Working Group on Sea-based Sources of Marine Litter (WG 43) and requested GESAMP to provide a progress report to MEPC 75 on the work of GESAMP WG 43, together with an accompanying presentation (MEPC 74/18, paragraph 8.26). A brief progress report is set out in document MEPC 75/8/5. 2 A first, interim report of the Working Group is provided in the annex to this document. It has been peer-reviewed and approved for circulation by GESAMP but should still be regarded as work in progress. An updated text, following any comments and inputs received from delegations, will form part of the Working Group's full report, which is expected to be finalized by the end of 2020. Comments and additional information that can assist in the work of the Working Group are therefore welcome. Action requested of the Committee 3 The Committee is invited to note the information provided. *** I:\MEPC\75\MEPC 75-INF.23.docx MEPC 75/INF.23 Annex, page 1 ANNEX SEA-BASED SOURCES OF MARINE LITTER – A REVIEW OF CURRENT KNOWLEDGE AND ASSESSMENT OF DATA GAPS First, interim report of GESAMP Working Group 43 January 2020 Notes: GESAMP is an advisory body consisting of specialized experts nominated by the Sponsoring Agencies (IMO, FAO, UNESCO-IOC, UNIDO, WMO, IAEA, UN, UNEP, UNDP and ISA). Its principal task is to provide scientific advice concerning the prevention, reduction and control of the degradation of the marine environment to the Sponsoring Organizations. The report contains views expressed or endorsed by members of GESAMP who act in their individual capacities; their views may not necessarily correspond with those of the Sponsoring Organizations. Permission may be granted by any of the Sponsoring Organizations for the report to be wholly or partially reproduced in publication by any individual who is not a staff member of a Sponsoring Organizations of GESAMP, provided that the source of the extract and the condition mentioned above are indicated. Information about GESAMP and its reports and studies can be found at: http://gesamp.org Copyright © IMO, FAO, UNESCO-IOC, UNIDO, WMO, IAEA, UN, UNEP, UNDP, ISA 2020 Authors: Kirsten V.K. Gilardi (WG 43 Chair), Kyle Antonelis, Francois Galgani, Emily Grilly, Pingguo He, Olof Linden, Rafaella Piermarini, Kelsey Richardson, David Santillo, Saly N. Thomas, Pieter Van den Dries, and Lumin Wang I:\MEPC\75\MEPC 75-INF.23.docx MEPC 75/INF.23 Annex, page 2 Executive Summary Marine litter, defined as 'any persistent, manufactured or processed solid material discarded, disposed of or abandoned in the marine and coastal environment' (Galgani et al. 2013) as a result of human activity, has been recognized as a threat to ocean health since our understanding of the environmental aspects of human actions in the ocean started to expand in the 1970s. Of particular concern is plastic litter, given its inherent strength and durability even under the extreme of marine conditions, compounded by the sheer quantity of plastic that has been manufactured, used and discarded globally since its commercial advent in the 1950s. It is generally assumed that the majority of plastic waste entering the world's oceans comes from land-based sources, yet marine litter resulting from sea-based activities, such as fishing, shipping, aquaculture, ocean dumping and other ocean-based activities, has not been rigorously quantified on any scale, and its contribution to the global burden of plastic debris in the world's oceans is poorly understood. Furthermore, certain forms of sea-based marine litter, such as abandoned, lost and discarded fishing gear (ALDFG) that is largely comprised of a variety of manufactured, synthetic materials that do not degrade in seawater, may not only be significant sources of marine plastic, but may well have far greater impacts on marine biota and habitats than do other forms of marine litter coming from sea or land. The overall objective of GESAMP Working Group 43 on Sea-based Sources of Marine Litter is to build a broader understanding of sea-based sources of marine litter, in particular from the shipping and fishing sectors, including the relative contribution of different sources, analysis of plastic use and management within both industries, and the range and extent of impacts from all sea-based sources of marine litter. The Working Group has also been mandated to work to build a more comprehensive understanding of specific types of sea-based sources of marine litter, and to guide interventions on these sources based on identified priorities, drawing upon the expertise of FAO, IMO, UN Environment Programme (UNEP) and other relevant organizations and experts. This first interim report represents progress made by WG 43 from June – December 2019 on achieving the following Terms of Reference (ToR): ToR 1: Identify sources of marine litter from sea based sources, including but not limited to fishing operations, aquaculture, shipping, dumping of waste and other matter at sea; and other sea-based sources (e.g. recreation); ToR 2: Estimate the relative contribution and impacts of different sea- based sources of marine litter; and ToR 4: Assess data gaps as identified under ToRs 1 to 3, and prioritize for further work. ToR 3, 5, 6, and 7 (see Section 1.2.2 for detail) are not addressed in this Interim Report; these terms will be addressed in future reports. Principal findings to date are that marine litter derived from sea-based activities and industries is of great concern, largely because synthetic materials comprise significant portions and components of debris entering the world's oceans from fishing, shipping, aquaculture, ocean dumping and other sources. Furthermore, certain types of sea-based marine litter, such as abandoned, lost or discarded fishing gear, are highly impactful on marine resources, wildlife, and habitats. However, at this time, it is not possible to estimate the total contribution of sea-based activities and industries to the global burden of marine litter because very little quantification of marine litter inputs exists in the scientific and grey literature. The Working Group intends to further explore and refine its findings, with intent to develop a scientifically defensible estimate of the relative contribution of sea-based sources of marine litter, further analyse the quantity and category of plastics produced and used by the fishing and shipping industries, identify ALDFG hotspots and further quantify the environmental and economic impacts of ALDFG, and review and compare options for mitigating the problem of sea-based sources of marine litter. I:\MEPC\75\MEPC 75-INF.23.docx MEPC 75/INF.23 Annex, page 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Introduction and Background 1.1 General overview 1.2 GESAMP Working Group 43 1.2.1 Scoping Activities 1.2.2 Terms of Reference 1.2.3 Defining "sea-based marine litter" 1.3 General approach to initial research and fact-finding 1.4 Literature cited 2 Fishing as a marine litter source 2.1 Background and introduction 2.1.1 Defining abandoned, lost or otherwise discarded fishing gear (ALDFG) 2.1.2 Fisheries, fisher populations, and fishing fleets 2.1.3 Fishing gear: Types and components 2.1.4 Recreational fisheries 2.1.5 Fish aggregating devices (FADs) 2.2 Causes of fishing gear abandonment, loss and discard 2.2.1. Environmental causes 2.2.2. Conflicts with gear 2.2.3. Fisheries management and regulations 2.2.4 Operator/user error 2.3 Literature review 2.3.1 Methods 2.3.2 Summary Findings 2.4. Literature cited 3 Aquaculture as a marine litter source 3.1 Background and introduction 3.2. Global aquaculture production 3.3. Aquaculture as a source of marine litter 3.3.1. Aquaculture equipment and plastics 3.3.2. Aquaculture-related litter 3.4. Literature cited 4 Shipping/boating as a marine litter source 4.1 Background and introduction 4.2. Types of marine litter from shipping 4.2.1. Microplastics from shipping and boating 4.3. Causes of marine litter from shipping 4.3.1. Shipwrecks 4.3.2. Lost containers and cargoes 4.3.3. Passengers ships 4.3.4. Fishing vessels operations 4.3.5. Recreational boating 4.3.6. Decommissioning / ship-breaking 4.4. Literature cited I:\MEPC\75\MEPC 75-INF.23.docx MEPC 75/INF.23 Annex, page 4 5 Dumping of Waste and Matter at Sea as a Marine Litter Source 5.1. Background and introduction 5.2. Sources and characterization of marine litter resulting from ocean dumping 5.2.1. Dredged materials 5.2.2. Sewage sludge 5.2.3. Fish waste, organic material of natural origin, and inert inorganics 5.2.4. Vessels, platforms and other man-made structures 5.2.5. 'Bulky' items 5.2.6. Spoilt cargoes 5.2.7. Other materials, including historical and illegal dumping. 5.3. Ocean dumping and plastics 5.4.
Recommended publications
  • Genoa Reclaims Role As Birthplace of Modern Marine Insurance By

    Genoa Reclaims Role As Birthplace of Modern Marine Insurance By

    Genoa reclaims role as birthplace of modern marine insurance By James Brewer The pioneering role of the medieval republic of Genoa in marine insurance was highlighted when underwriters gathered in the city state’s modern incarnation for the 142nd conference of the International Union of Marine Insurance. Genoa’s importance throughout the development of the Dieter Berg, Maria Bianca Farina international insurance market was emphasised by contemporary and IUMI secretary general Lars civic leaders and by insurance and shipping executives present at Lange. the 2016 IUMI conference. IUMI president Dieter Berg said that the influence of Genoa, known as La Superba (the proud city) from the time of its prime sea power hundreds of years ago, spread to regions of southern and eastern Europe including the Black Sea. Genoa’s importance throughout the development of the international insurance market was emphasised by contemporary civic leaders and by insurance and shipping executives present at the 2016 IUMI conference. IUMI president Dieter Berg said that the influence of Genoa, known as La Superba (the proud city) from the time of its prime sea power hundreds of years ago, spread to regions of southern and eastern Europe including the Black Sea. He told guests at a conference welcome evening at the stately Palazzo Ducale that Genoa produced the first documented hull and cargo insurance contracts in 1347, and a few years later, the first reinsurance contract, leading to the development of the first forms of modern insurance practice. “Insurance, my friends from London, took another 140 years before the first contract was issued in London,” said Mr Berg.
  • 2019-2020 Netukulimk Fish Harvest Plan

    2019-2020 Netukulimk Fish Harvest Plan

    ACADIA FIRST NATION 2019/20 NETUKULIMK FISH HARVEST PLAN Netukulimk is a cultural concept that encompasses Mi’kmaq sovereign law ways and guides individual and collective beliefs and behaviours in resource protection, procurement and management to ensure and honour sustainability and prosperity for our present and future generations. The Mi’kmaq relationship with the land, water and all wildlife in Mi’kma’ki laid the foundation for how we interact with and respect all life, as an expression of Mi’kmaq law ways. The principles of netukulimk are embedded in a value system that shaped the interaction between the Mi’kmaq and nature as a set of rules and obligations based on respectful gathering from the land and water in a manner that discouraged resource waste. Thus, through netukulimk, a human and animal relationship formed that allowed the survival of both in a sustainable manner. This Fishing Plan deals with food, social and ceremonial (“FSC”) fishing harvest by members of the Acadia First Nation as an aspect of netukulimk and as an exercise of Mi’kmaq self-government protected by section 35 of the Constitution Act, Canada. Access for the exercise of the FSC rights of the Mi’kmaq are a first priority in the fishery, after the needs of conservation have been met. This Netukulimk Fishing Plan is an evolving document and will be updated or amended by Chief and Council as required. It does not exhaustively define our Aboriginal right to fish or its scope; however, for the 2018/2019 fishing season, it is intended to provide a mechanism for the exercise of those rights within a system of proper management of the fisheries and the conservation and protection of fish.
  • Part I. an Annotated Checklist of Extant Brachyuran Crabs of the World

    Part I. an Annotated Checklist of Extant Brachyuran Crabs of the World

    THE RAFFLES BULLETIN OF ZOOLOGY 2008 17: 1–286 Date of Publication: 31 Jan.2008 © National University of Singapore SYSTEMA BRACHYURORUM: PART I. AN ANNOTATED CHECKLIST OF EXTANT BRACHYURAN CRABS OF THE WORLD Peter K. L. Ng Raffles Museum of Biodiversity Research, Department of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, Kent Ridge, Singapore 119260, Republic of Singapore Email: [email protected] Danièle Guinot Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle, Département Milieux et peuplements aquatiques, 61 rue Buffon, 75005 Paris, France Email: [email protected] Peter J. F. Davie Queensland Museum, PO Box 3300, South Brisbane, Queensland, Australia Email: [email protected] ABSTRACT. – An annotated checklist of the extant brachyuran crabs of the world is presented for the first time. Over 10,500 names are treated including 6,793 valid species and subspecies (with 1,907 primary synonyms), 1,271 genera and subgenera (with 393 primary synonyms), 93 families and 38 superfamilies. Nomenclatural and taxonomic problems are reviewed in detail, and many resolved. Detailed notes and references are provided where necessary. The constitution of a large number of families and superfamilies is discussed in detail, with the positions of some taxa rearranged in an attempt to form a stable base for future taxonomic studies. This is the first time the nomenclature of any large group of decapod crustaceans has been examined in such detail. KEY WORDS. – Annotated checklist, crabs of the world, Brachyura, systematics, nomenclature. CONTENTS Preamble .................................................................................. 3 Family Cymonomidae .......................................... 32 Caveats and acknowledgements ............................................... 5 Family Phyllotymolinidae .................................... 32 Introduction .............................................................................. 6 Superfamily DROMIOIDEA ..................................... 33 The higher classification of the Brachyura ........................
  • Lobster Review

    Lobster Review

    Seafood Watch Seafood Report American lobster Homarus americanus (Image © Monterey Bay Aquarium) Northeast Region Final Report February 2, 2006 Matthew Elliott Independent Consultant Monterey Bay Aquarium American Lobster About Seafood Watch® and the Seafood Reports Monterey Bay Aquarium’s Seafood Watch® program evaluates the ecological sustainability of wild-caught and farmed seafood commonly found in the United States marketplace. Seafood Watch® defines sustainable seafood as originating from sources, whether wild-caught or farmed, which can maintain or increase production in the long-term without jeopardizing the structure or function of affected ecosystems. Seafood Watch® makes its science-based recommendations available to the public in the form of regional pocket guides that can be downloaded from the Internet (seafoodwatch.org) or obtained from the Seafood Watch® program by emailing [email protected]. The program’s goals are to raise awareness of important ocean conservation issues and empower seafood consumers and businesses to make choices for healthy oceans. Each sustainability recommendation on the regional pocket guides is supported by a Seafood Report. Each report synthesizes and analyzes the most current ecological, fisheries and ecosystem science on a species, then evaluates this information against the program’s conservation ethic to arrive at a recommendation of “Best Choices,” “Good Alternatives,” or “Avoid.” The detailed evaluation methodology is available upon request. In producing the Seafood Reports, Seafood Watch® seeks out research published in academic, peer-reviewed journals whenever possible. Other sources of information include government technical publications, fishery management plans and supporting documents, and other scientific reviews of ecological sustainability. Seafood Watch® Fisheries Research Analysts also communicate regularly with ecologists, fisheries and aquaculture scientists, and members of industry and conservation organizations when evaluating fisheries and aquaculture practices.
  • (Stomatopoda: Decapoda) Associated with the Deepwater

    (Stomatopoda: Decapoda) Associated with the Deepwater

    Revista de Biología Tropical ISSN: 0034-7744 [email protected] Universidad de Costa Rica Costa Rica Wehrtmann, Ingo S.; Echeverría-Sáenz, Silvia Crustacean fauna (Stomatopoda: Decapoda) associated with the deepwater fishery of Heterocarpus vicarius (Decapoda: Pandalidae) along the Pacific coast of Costa Rica Revista de Biología Tropical, vol. 55, núm. 1, 2007, pp. 121-130 Universidad de Costa Rica San Pedro de Montes de Oca, Costa Rica Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=44909916 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative Crustacean fauna (Stomatopoda: Decapoda) associated with the deepwater fishery of Heterocarpus vicarius (Decapoda: Pandalidae) along the Pacific coast of Costa Rica Ingo S. Wehrtmann 1,2,3 & Silvia Echeverría-Sáenz 1 1 Escuela de Biología, 2 Museo de Zoología y 3 Centro de Investigaciones en Ciencias del Mar y Limnología (CIMAR), Universidad de Costa Rica, 2060 San José, Costa Rica; [email protected] Received 11-X-2005. Corrected 08-VIII-2006. Accepted 16-III-2007. Abstract: Commercial bottom trawling is a successful and commonly used method to catch marine shrimps. However, the shrimp fishing gears are poorly selective, and in addition to the target species they catch and retain large quantities of non-target species (bycatch). This study presents data concerning species composition and depth distribution of the crustacean fauna (stomatopods and decapods) associated with Heterocarpus vicarius catches from Pacific Costa Rica.
  • RI Marine Fisheries Statutes and Regulations

    RI Marine Fisheries Statutes and Regulations

    Summary of Changes 8.1.9(I) Lobster and Cancer Crab pots: (A1) Maximum size: 22,950 cubic inches. (B2) Escape vents: Each and every lobster and Cancer crab pot, set, kept, or maintained or caused to be set, kept, or maintained in any of the waters in the jurisdiction of this State by any person properly licensed, shall contain an escape vent in accordance with the following specifications: (20-7-11(a)) (gvii) Lobster and Cancer crab traps not constructed entirely of wood must contain a ghost panel with the following specifications: 8.1.13(M) Commercial lobster trap tags: (A1) No person shall have on board a vessel or set, deploy, place, keep, maintain, lift, or raise; from, in, or upon the waters under the jurisdiction of the State of Rhode Island any lobster pot for taking of American lobster or Cancer crab without the pot having a valid State of Rhode Island lobster trap tag. (LN) For persons possessing a valid RI commercial fishing license (licensee) for the catching, taking, or landing of American lobster or Cancer Crab, and who also own or are incorporated/partnered in a vessel(s) holding a Federal Limited Access Lobster Permit (Federal Lobster Permit), the following shall apply: (1) No harvesting of lobsters or Cancer Crab may occur in any LCMA by means of any lobster trap for which a trap tag has not been issued. All vessels owned/incorporated/partnered by said licensee which hold a Federal Lobster Permit shall annually declare all LCMA(s) in which the licensee intends to fish during the fishery year.
  • Impact of “Ghost Fishing“ Via Derelict Fishing Gear

    Impact of “Ghost Fishing“ Via Derelict Fishing Gear

    2015 NOAA Marine Debris Program Report Impact of “Ghost Fishing“ via Derelict Fishing Gear 2015 MARINE DEBRIS GHOST FISHING REPORT March 2015 National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Ocean Service National Centers for Coastal Ocean Science – Center for Coastal Environmental Health and Biomolecular Research 219 Ft. Johnson Rd. Charleston, South Carolina 29412 Office of Response and Restoration NOAA Marine Debris Program 1305 East-West Hwy, SSMC4, Room 10239 Silver Spring, Maryland 20910 Cover photo courtesy of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration For citation purposes, please use: NOAA Marine Debris Program. 2015 Report on the impacts of “ghost fishing” via derelict fishing gear. Silver Spring, MD. 25 pp For more information, please contact: NOAA Marine Debris Program Office of Response and Restoration National Ocean Service 1305 East West Highway Silver Spring, Maryland 20910 301-713-2989 Acknowledgements The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Marine Debris Program would like to acknowledge Jennifer Maucher Fuquay (NOAA National Ocean Service, National Centers for Coastal Ocean Science) for conducting this research, and Courtney Arthur (NOAA National Ocean Service, Marine Debris Program) and Jason Paul Landrum (NOAA National Ocean Service, Marine Debris Program) for providing guidance and support throughout this process. Special thanks go to Ariana Sutton-Grier (NOAA National Ocean Science) and Peter Murphy (NOAA National Ocean Service, Marine Debris Program) for reviewing this paper and providing helpful comments. Special thanks also go to John Hayes (NOAA National Ocean Service, National Centers for Coastal Ocean Science) and Dianna Parker (NOAA National Ocean Science, Marine Debris Program) for a copy/edit review of this report and Leah L.
  • View, CMM-I-2126

    View, CMM-I-2126

    SYSTEMATICS AND PALEOECOLOGY OF MIOCENE PORTUNID AND CANCRID DECAPOD FOSSILS FROM THE ST. MARYS FORMATION, MARYLAND A thesis submitted To Kent State University in partial Fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Science by Heedar Bahman August, 2018 © Copyright All rights reserved Except for previously published materials Thesis written by Heedar Bahman B.S., Kuwait University, 2011 M.S., Kent State University, 2018 Approved by Rodney M. Feldmann , Ph.D., Advisor Daniel Holm , Ph.D., Chair, Department of Geology James L. Blank , Ph.D., Dean, College of Arts and Sciences TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................................... iii LIST OF FIGURES ........................................................................................................... iv LIST OF TABLES ............................................................................................................ vii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ............................................................................................... viii SUMMARY .........................................................................................................................1 INTRODUCTION ...............................................................................................................2 GEOLOGICAL SETTING ..................................................................................................5 METHODS ..........................................................................................................................7
  • Northern Zone Rock Lobster (Jasus Edwardsii) Fishery 2004/05

    Northern Zone Rock Lobster (Jasus Edwardsii) Fishery 2004/05

    Final Stock Assessment Report to PIRSA Fisheries Northern Zone Rock Lobster (Jasus edwardsii) Fishery 2004/05 A. Linnane, R. McGarvey, J. Feenstra and T. M. Ward May 2006 SARDI Research Report Series No. RD04/0165-3 This report is the fourth version of a “living” document that is updated annually as part of SARDI Aquatic Sciences’ ongoing fishery assessment program for South Australia’s Northern Zone Rock Lobster Fishery. The report provides a synopsis of information available for the fishery and assesses the current status of the resource. The report also identifies both current and future research needs for the fishery. Title: Northern Zone Rock Lobster (Jasus edwardsii) Fishery 2004/05 Sub-title: Final Stock Assessment Report to PIRSA Fisheries South Australian Research and Development Institute SARDI Aquatic Sciences 2 Hamra Avenue West Beach SA 5024 Telephone: (08) 8207 5400 Facsimile: (08) 8207 5406 http://www.sardi.sa.gov.au The authors warrant that they have taken all reasonable care in producing this report. This report has been through SARDI Aquatic Sciences internal review process, and was formally approved for release by the Chief Scientist. Although all reasonable efforts have been made to ensure quality, SARDI Aquatic Sciences does not warrant that the information in this report is free from errors or omissions. SARDI Aquatic Sciences does not accept any liability for the contents of this report or for any consequences arising from its use or any reliance placed upon it. © 2006 SARDI Aquatic Sciences This work is copyright. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process without prior written permission from the author.
  • Current Ocean Wise Approved Canadian MSC Fisheries

    Current Ocean Wise Approved Canadian MSC Fisheries

    Current Ocean Wise approved Canadian MSC Fisheries Updated: November 14, 2017 Legend: Blue - Ocean Wise Red - Not Ocean Wise White - Only specific areas or gear types are Ocean Wise Species Common Name Latin Name MSC Fishery Name Gear Location Reason for Exception Clam Clearwater Seafoods Banquereau and Banquereau Bank Artic surf clam Mactromeris polynyma Grand Banks Arctic surf clam Hydraulic dredges Grand Banks Crab Snow Crab Chionoecetes opilio Gulf of St Lawrence snow crab trap Conical or rectangular crab pots (traps) North West Atlantic - Nova Scotia Snow Crab Chionoecetes opilio Scotian shelf snow crab trap Conical or rectangular crab pots (traps) North West Atlantic - Nova Scotia Snow Crab Chionoecetes opilio Newfoundland & Labrador snow crab Pots Newfoundland & Labrador Flounder/Sole Yellowtail flounder Limanda ferruginea OCI Grand Bank yellowtail flounder trawl Demersal trawl Grand Banks Haddock Trawl Bottom longline Gillnet Hook and Line CAN - Scotian shelf 4X5Y Trawl Bottom longline Gillnet Atlantic haddock Melangrammus aeglefinus Canada Scotia-Fundy haddock Hook and Line CAN - Scotian shelf 5Zjm Hake Washington, Oregon and California North Pacific hake Merluccius productus Pacific hake mid-water trawl Mid-water Trawl British Columbia Halibut Pacific Halibut Hippoglossus stenolepis Canada Pacific halibut (British Columbia) Bottom longline British Columbia Longline Nova Scotia and Newfoundland Gillnet including part of the Grand banks and Trawl Georges bank, NAFO areas 3NOPS, Atlantic Halibut Hippoglossus hippoglossus Canada
  • Management Foundation Underpinning MOL: Corporate Governance and Corporate Social Responsibility

    Management Foundation Underpinning MOL: Corporate Governance and Corporate Social Responsibility

    Annual Report 2014 51 Management Foundation Underpinning MOL: Corporate Governance and Corporate Social Responsibility Contents 52 Board Of Directors, Corporate Auditors And Executive Offi cers 54 MOL’s Approach to Governance, Safety and CSR 56 Corporate Governance 60 Risk Management 62 Safe Operation 65 Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) 114mol_英文0730佐々木.indd4mol_英文0730佐々木.indd 5511 22014/07/30014/07/30 115:295:29 52 MItsui O.S.K. Lines Board Of Directors, Corporate Auditors And Executive Offi cers Apr. 1976 Joined Mitsui O.S.K. Lines, Ltd. Apr. 1975 Joined Mitsui O.S.K. Lines, Ltd. Jun. 2002 General Manager of Bulk Jun. 2001 General Manager of LNG Carrier Division Carrier Division (A) Jan. 2003 General Manager of Corporate Jun. 2004 General Manager of LNG Planning Division Carrier Division Jun. 2004 Executive Offi cer, General Jun. 2005 Executive Offi cer, Manager of Corporate General Manager of LNG Planning Division Carrier Division Jun. 2006 Managing Executive Offi cer Jun. 2008 Managing Executive Offi cer Jun. 2007 Director, Managing Executive Offi cer Jun. 2010 Senior Managing Executive Jun. 2008 Director, Senior Managing Offi cer Executive Offi cer Kazuhiro Sato Jun. 2013 Representative Director, Koichi Muto Jun. 2010 Representative Director, President Executive Vice President Representative Director Born 1953 Executive Offi cer (current) Representative Director Born 1953 Executive Offi cer (current) Apr. 1978 Joined Mitsui O.S.K. Lines, Ltd. Apr. 1979 Joined Mitsui O.S.K. Lines, Ltd. Jun. 2004 General Manager of Tanker Jun. 2004 General Manager of Human Division Resources Division Jun. 2006 Executive Offi cer Jun. 2007 General Manager of Liner Jun. 2008 Managing Executive Offi cer Division Jun.
  • Sea-Based Sources of Marine Litter – a Review of Current Knowledge and Assessment of Data Gaps (Second Interim Report of Gesamp Working Group 43, 4 June 2020)

    Sea-Based Sources of Marine Litter – a Review of Current Knowledge and Assessment of Data Gaps (Second Interim Report of Gesamp Working Group 43, 4 June 2020)

    August 2020 COFI/2020/SBD.8 8 E COMMITTEE ON FISHERIES Thirty-Fourth Session Rome, 1-5 February 2021 (TBC) SEA-BASED SOURCES OF MARINE LITTER – A REVIEW OF CURRENT KNOWLEDGE AND ASSESSMENT OF DATA GAPS (SECOND INTERIM REPORT OF GESAMP WORKING GROUP 43, 4 JUNE 2020) SEA-BASED SOURCES OF MARINE LITTER – A REVIEW OF CURRENT KNOWLEDGE AND ASSESSMENT OF DATA GAPS Second Interim Report of GESAMP Working Group 43 4 June 2020 GESAMP WG 43 Second Interim Report, June 4, 2020 COFI/2021/SBD.8 Notes: GESAMP is an advisory body consisting of specialized experts nominated by the Sponsoring Agencies (IMO, FAO, UNESCO-IOC, UNIDO, WMO, IAEA, UN, UNEP, UNDP and ISA). Its principal task is to provide scientific advice concerning the prevention, reduction and control of the degradation of the marine environment to the Sponsoring Organizations. The report contains views expressed or endorsed by members of GESAMP who act in their individual capacities; their views may not necessarily correspond with those of the Sponsoring Organizations. Permission may be granted by any of the Sponsoring Organizations for the report to be wholly or partially reproduced in publication by any individual who is not a staff member of a Sponsoring Organizations of GESAMP, provided that the source of the extract and the condition mentioned above are indicated. Information about GESAMP and its reports and studies can be found at: http://gesamp.org Copyright © IMO, FAO, UNESCO-IOC, UNIDO, WMO, IAEA, UN, UNEP, UNDP, ISA 2020 ii Authors: Kirsten V.K. Gilardi (WG 43 Chair), Kyle Antonelis, Francois Galgani, Emily Grilly, Pingguo He, Olof Linden, Rafaella Piermarini, Kelsey Richardson, David Santillo, Saly N.