Systema Brachyurorum: Part I

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Systema Brachyurorum: Part I THE RAFFLES BULLETIN OF ZOOLOGY 2008 17: 1–286 Date of Publication: 31 Jan.2008 © National University of Singapore SYSTEMA BRACHYURORUM: PART I. AN ANNOTATED CHECKLIST OF EXTANT BRACHYURAN CRABS OF THE WORLD Peter K. L. Ng Raffles Museum of Biodiversity Research, Department of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, Kent Ridge, Singapore 119260, Republic of Singapore Email: [email protected] Danièle Guinot Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle, Département Milieux et peuplements aquatiques, 61 rue Buffon, 75005 Paris, France Email: [email protected] Peter J. F. Davie Queensland Museum, PO Box 3300, South Brisbane, Queensland, Australia Email: [email protected] ABSTRACT. – An annotated checklist of the extant brachyuran crabs of the world is presented for the first time. Over 10,500 names are treated including 6,793 valid species and subspecies (with 1,907 primary synonyms), 1,271 genera and subgenera (with 393 primary synonyms), 93 families and 38 superfamilies. Nomenclatural and taxonomic problems are reviewed in detail, and many resolved. Detailed notes and references are provided where necessary. The constitution of a large number of families and superfamilies is discussed in detail, with the positions of some taxa rearranged in an attempt to form a stable base for future taxonomic studies. This is the first time the nomenclature of any large group of decapod crustaceans has been examined in such detail. KEY WORDS. – Annotated checklist, crabs of the world, Brachyura, systematics, nomenclature. CONTENTS Preamble .................................................................................. 3 Family Cymonomidae .......................................... 32 Caveats and acknowledgements ............................................... 5 Family Phyllotymolinidae .................................... 32 Introduction .............................................................................. 6 Superfamily DROMIOIDEA ..................................... 33 The higher classification of the Brachyura ......................... 6 Family Dromiidae ................................................ 33 Fossil fauna ........................................................................ 8 Family Dynomenidae ........................................... 37 How many crab species are there? ..................................... 9 Superfamily HOMOLODROMIOIDEA .................... 39 Descriptive terms ..................................................................... 9 Family Homolodromiidae .................................... 39 Methods .................................................................................. 17 Superfamily HOMOLOIDEA .................................... 40 Notes on general nomenclature .............................................. 18 Family Homolidae ............................................... 40 Notes on authorships of taxa .................................................. 20 Family Latreilliidae .............................................. 41 Notes on some papers of nomenclatural significance ............. 21 Family Poupiniidae .............................................. 41 List of extant brachyuran superfamilies, families Superfamily RANINOIDEA ...................................... 42 and subfamilies ................................................................ 26 Family Raninidae ................................................. 42 Checklist ................................................................................ 31 Section Eubrachyura ......................................................... 44 Section Podotremata ........................................................ 31 Subsection Heterotremata ............................................. 44 Superfamily CYCLODORIPPOIDEA ....................... 31 Superfamily AETHROIDEA ..................................... 44 Family Cyclodorippidae ...................................... 31 Family Aethridae ................................................. 44 1 Ng et al.: Systema Brachyurorum Part I Superfamily BELLIOIDEA ....................................... 46 Family Crossotonotidae ..................................... 127 Family Belliidae .................................................. 46 Family Palicidae ................................................ 127 Superfamily BYTHOGRAEIODEA .......................... 47 Superfamily PARTHENOPOIDEA ......................... 129 Family Bythograeidae ......................................... 47 Family Parthenopidae ......................................... 129 Superfamily CALAPPOIDEA ................................... 48 Superfamily PILUMNOIDEA ................................. 135 Family Calappidae ............................................... 48 Family Galenidae ............................................... 136 Family Matutidae ................................................ 50 Family Pilumnidae ............................................. 138 Superfamily CANCROIDEA .................................... 51 Family Tanaocheleidae ...................................... 146 Family Atelecyclidae ........................................... 51 Superfamily PORTUNOIDEA ................................. 147 Family Cancridae ................................................ 53 Family Geryonidae ............................................ 147 Family Pirimelidae .............................................. 53 Family Portunidae .............................................. 147 Superfamily CARPILIOIDEA ................................... 54 Superfamily POTAMOIDEA ................................... 159 Family Carpiliidae ............................................... 54 Family Potamidae .............................................. 159 Superfamily CHEIRAGONOIDEA ........................... 55 Family Potamonautidae ..................................... 169 Family Cheiragonidae ......................................... 55 Superfamily PSEUDOTHELPHUSOIDEA ............. 173 Superfamily CORYSTOIDEA .................................. 56 Family Pseudothelphusidae ............................... 173 Family Corystidae ............................................... 56 Superfamily PSEUDOZIOIDEA ............................. 179 Superfamily DAIROIDEA ........................................ 57 Family Pilumnoididae ........................................ 179 Family Dacryopilumnidae ................................... 57 Family Planopilumnidae .................................... 179 Family Dairidae ................................................... 58 Family Pseudoziidae .......................................... 180 Superfamily DORIPPOIDEA .................................... 59 Superfamily RETROPLUMOIDEA ......................... 181 Family Dorippidae ............................................... 59 Family Retroplumidae ....................................... 181 Family Ethusidae ................................................. 60 Superfamily THIOIDEA .......................................... 182 Superfamily ERIPHIOIDEA ..................................... 62 Family Thiidae ................................................... 182 Family Dairoididae .............................................. 63 Superfamily TRAPEZIOIDEA ................................ 183 Family Eriphiidae ................................................ 63 Family Domeciidae ............................................ 183 Family Hypothalassiidae ..................................... 63 Family Tetraliidae .............................................. 184 Family Menippidae ............................................. 64 Family Trapeziidae ............................................ 185 Family Oziidae .................................................... 65 Superfamily TRICHODACTYLOIDEA .................. 187 Family Platyxanthidae ......................................... 66 Family Trichodactylidae .................................... 187 Superfamily GECARCINUCOIDEA ........................ 67 Superfamily XANTHOIDEA ................................... 189 Family Gecarcinucidae ........................................ 67 Family Panopeidae ............................................. 189 Family Parathelphusidae ..................................... 69 Family Pseudorhombilidae ................................ 192 Superfamily GONEPLACOIDEA ............................. 75 Family Xanthidae ............................................... 193 Family Acidopsidae ............................................. 75 Subsection Thoracotremata ......................................... 212 Family Chasmocarcinidae ................................... 76 Superfamily CRYPTOCHIROIDEA ........................ 212 Family Conleyidae ............................................... 77 Family Cryptochiridae ....................................... 212 Family Euryplacidae ........................................... 78 Superfamily GRAPSOIDEA .................................... 214 Family Goneplacidae ........................................... 80 Family Gecarcinidae .......................................... 214 Family Litocheiridae ........................................... 83 Family Glyptograpsidae ..................................... 216 Family Mathildellidae ......................................... 83 Family Grapsidae ............................................... 216 Family Progeryonidae ......................................... 84 Family Plagusiidae ............................................. 218 Family Scalopidiidae ..........................................
Recommended publications
  • A Classification of Living and Fossil Genera of Decapod Crustaceans
    RAFFLES BULLETIN OF ZOOLOGY 2009 Supplement No. 21: 1–109 Date of Publication: 15 Sep.2009 © National University of Singapore A CLASSIFICATION OF LIVING AND FOSSIL GENERA OF DECAPOD CRUSTACEANS Sammy De Grave1, N. Dean Pentcheff 2, Shane T. Ahyong3, Tin-Yam Chan4, Keith A. Crandall5, Peter C. Dworschak6, Darryl L. Felder7, Rodney M. Feldmann8, Charles H. J. M. Fransen9, Laura Y. D. Goulding1, Rafael Lemaitre10, Martyn E. Y. Low11, Joel W. Martin2, Peter K. L. Ng11, Carrie E. Schweitzer12, S. H. Tan11, Dale Tshudy13, Regina Wetzer2 1Oxford University Museum of Natural History, Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3PW, United Kingdom [email protected] [email protected] 2Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, 900 Exposition Blvd., Los Angeles, CA 90007 United States of America [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] 3Marine Biodiversity and Biosecurity, NIWA, Private Bag 14901, Kilbirnie Wellington, New Zealand [email protected] 4Institute of Marine Biology, National Taiwan Ocean University, Keelung 20224, Taiwan, Republic of China [email protected] 5Department of Biology and Monte L. Bean Life Science Museum, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602 United States of America [email protected] 6Dritte Zoologische Abteilung, Naturhistorisches Museum, Wien, Austria [email protected] 7Department of Biology, University of Louisiana, Lafayette, LA 70504 United States of America [email protected] 8Department of Geology, Kent State University, Kent, OH 44242 United States of America [email protected] 9Nationaal Natuurhistorisch Museum, P. O. Box 9517, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands [email protected] 10Invertebrate Zoology, Smithsonian Institution, National Museum of Natural History, 10th and Constitution Avenue, Washington, DC 20560 United States of America [email protected] 11Department of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, Science Drive 4, Singapore 117543 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] 12Department of Geology, Kent State University Stark Campus, 6000 Frank Ave.
    [Show full text]
  • And Gecarcoidea Lalandii H. Milne
    Journal of Natural History, 2002, 36, 1671–1685 First zoealstages of Epigrapsuspolitus Heller, E. notatus (Heller)and Gecarcoidealalandii H.Milne-Edwards, with remarks on zoeal morphologyof the Gecarcinidae Macleay (Crustacea: Brachyura) JOSE´ A.CUESTA†, HUNG-CHANG LIU‡and CHRISTOPH D. SCHUBART†1 †Department ofBiology, Laboratory for CrustaceanResearch, University ofLouisianaat Lafayette,Lafayette, LA 70504-2451,USA; e-mail: [email protected] ‡Department ofLife Science, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu, Taiwan (Accepted10 April 2001 ) Thecrab family Gecarcinidae Macleay, 1838 currently consists of 18speciesthat aregrouped in four genera. Larval data for the Gecarcinidae were only known forspecies of the genera Cardisoma Latreille,1825 and Gecarcinus Leach,1814. Inthe present paper, the rstzoeal stage of Gecarcoidealalandii H. Milne- Edwards,1837, Epigrapsuspolitus Heller,1862 and E. notatus Heller,1865 are describedand illustrated. Zoeal morphology of the Gecarcinidae is reviewed, takinginto account all previous descriptions and analysing the relationships betweenthe di Verentgenera of Gecarcinidae based on zoeal morphological characters.A seriesof typical morphological features is proposed for the zoea larvaeof this family di Verentiatingthem from the rest of the Grapsoidea. Keywords: Larvalmorphology, Gecarcinidae, Gecarcoidea , Epigrapsus, zoea. Introduction The grapsoid familyGecarcinidae has acircumtropical distribution, with many species known only from oceanic islands. The familypresently consists of 18species that aredistributed
    [Show full text]
  • Part I. an Annotated Checklist of Extant Brachyuran Crabs of the World
    THE RAFFLES BULLETIN OF ZOOLOGY 2008 17: 1–286 Date of Publication: 31 Jan.2008 © National University of Singapore SYSTEMA BRACHYURORUM: PART I. AN ANNOTATED CHECKLIST OF EXTANT BRACHYURAN CRABS OF THE WORLD Peter K. L. Ng Raffles Museum of Biodiversity Research, Department of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, Kent Ridge, Singapore 119260, Republic of Singapore Email: [email protected] Danièle Guinot Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle, Département Milieux et peuplements aquatiques, 61 rue Buffon, 75005 Paris, France Email: [email protected] Peter J. F. Davie Queensland Museum, PO Box 3300, South Brisbane, Queensland, Australia Email: [email protected] ABSTRACT. – An annotated checklist of the extant brachyuran crabs of the world is presented for the first time. Over 10,500 names are treated including 6,793 valid species and subspecies (with 1,907 primary synonyms), 1,271 genera and subgenera (with 393 primary synonyms), 93 families and 38 superfamilies. Nomenclatural and taxonomic problems are reviewed in detail, and many resolved. Detailed notes and references are provided where necessary. The constitution of a large number of families and superfamilies is discussed in detail, with the positions of some taxa rearranged in an attempt to form a stable base for future taxonomic studies. This is the first time the nomenclature of any large group of decapod crustaceans has been examined in such detail. KEY WORDS. – Annotated checklist, crabs of the world, Brachyura, systematics, nomenclature. CONTENTS Preamble .................................................................................. 3 Family Cymonomidae .......................................... 32 Caveats and acknowledgements ............................................... 5 Family Phyllotymolinidae .................................... 32 Introduction .............................................................................. 6 Superfamily DROMIOIDEA ..................................... 33 The higher classification of the Brachyura ........................
    [Show full text]
  • 09-Innocenti 123-135
    Atti Soc. Tosc. Sci. Nat., Mem., Serie B, 120 (2013) pagg. 123-135, tab. 1; doi: 10.2424/ASTSN.M.2013.09 GIANNA INNOCENTI & GIANLUCA STASOLLA (*) COLLECTIONS OF THE NATURAL HISTORY MUSEUM ZOOLOGICAL SECTION «LA SPECOLA» OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORENCE XXXI. Crustacea, Class Malacostraca, Order Decapoda. Superfamilies Dromioidea, Homoloidea, Aethroidea, Bellioidea, Calappoidea, Cancroidea, Carpilioidea, Cheiragonoidea, Corystoidea, Dairoidea, Dorippoidea, Eriphioidea Abstract - Collections of the Natural History Museum Zoological 1952). The first specimens were two species collected Section «La Specola» of the University of Florence. XXXI. Crustacea, during the cruise of the R/N «Magenta» (1865-1868), Class Malacostraca, Order Decapoda. Superfamilies Dromioidea, Homo- loidea, Aethroidea, Bellioidea, Calappoidea, Cancroidea, Carpilioidea, reported also by Targioni Tozzetti (1877) in his ca- Cheiragonoidea, Corystoidea, Dairoidea, Dorippoidea, Eriphioidea.A talogue. list of the specimens belonging to the order Decapoda, belonging Besides past collections, a good part of the Museum to the following families: Dromiidae, Dynomenidae, Homolidae, holdings consist of specimens collected in Somalia and Aethridae, Belliidae, Calappidae, Matutidae, Atelecyclidae, Can- cridae, Pirimelidae, Carpiliidae, Cheiragonidae, Corystidae, Dacry- other East African countries, during research missions opilumnidae, Dairidae, Dorippidae, Ethusidae, Eriphiidae, Menip- conducted by the Museum itself, by the «Spedizione pidae, Oziidae, Platyxanthidae preserved in the
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity: the UK Overseas Territories. Peterborough, Joint Nature Conservation Committee
    Biodiversity: the UK Overseas Territories Compiled by S. Oldfield Edited by D. Procter and L.V. Fleming ISBN: 1 86107 502 2 © Copyright Joint Nature Conservation Committee 1999 Illustrations and layout by Barry Larking Cover design Tracey Weeks Printed by CLE Citation. Procter, D., & Fleming, L.V., eds. 1999. Biodiversity: the UK Overseas Territories. Peterborough, Joint Nature Conservation Committee. Disclaimer: reference to legislation and convention texts in this document are correct to the best of our knowledge but must not be taken to infer definitive legal obligation. Cover photographs Front cover: Top right: Southern rockhopper penguin Eudyptes chrysocome chrysocome (Richard White/JNCC). The world’s largest concentrations of southern rockhopper penguin are found on the Falkland Islands. Centre left: Down Rope, Pitcairn Island, South Pacific (Deborah Procter/JNCC). The introduced rat population of Pitcairn Island has successfully been eradicated in a programme funded by the UK Government. Centre right: Male Anegada rock iguana Cyclura pinguis (Glen Gerber/FFI). The Anegada rock iguana has been the subject of a successful breeding and re-introduction programme funded by FCO and FFI in collaboration with the National Parks Trust of the British Virgin Islands. Back cover: Black-browed albatross Diomedea melanophris (Richard White/JNCC). Of the global breeding population of black-browed albatross, 80 % is found on the Falkland Islands and 10% on South Georgia. Background image on front and back cover: Shoal of fish (Charles Sheppard/Warwick
    [Show full text]
  • Crustacea, Decapoda, Brachyura), from the Eocene of the Iberian Peninsula
    BATALLERIA 24 2017 6-12 (Barcelona, mayo 2017) ISSN0214-7831 Tavernolesia, new genus (Crustacea, Decapoda, Brachyura), from the Eocene of the Iberian Peninsula Pedro Artal 1 & Alfonso Onetti2 1 Museo Geológico del Seminario de Barcelona, Diputación 231, 08007 Barcelona, Spain. E-mail: [email protected] 2 Quarter Sanata 18, 08460 Santa María de Palautordera (Barcelona, Spain). E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT- Some new fossil brachyurans from Middle Eocene (Middle Lutetian) strata in the Provinces of Barcelona and Girona (Catalonia, Spain), discovered in old collections housed in the Geological Museum of Barcelona Seminary (= MGSB), assigned until now to the genus Stenodromia, present after accurate preparation, extraordinary fairly complete female ventral portions, complete attached chelipeds, and complete dorsal features. The main ventral characters of a unique specimen, such as the narrow, subtriangular female abdomen, with all abdominal segments free, not totally covering the narrow sternum, and the complete attached chelipeds, permit detailed and more confident comparison with closer fossil and extant genera. The unique assemblage of characters, mainly the peculiar frontal and orbital construction, the dorsal rows of discrete tubercles, the absence of deep dorsal grooves, together with the conspicuously long mesobranchial spines, warrants the erection of a new genus, Tavernolesia n. gen. The completeness of the new specimens, permit more detailed diagnosis, and the placement in the superfamily Calappoidea is confirmed. RESUMEN - La cuidadosa preparación de algunos crustáceos decápodos, procedentes de antiguas colecciones, actualmente depositados en el MGSB, presenta una extraordinaria conservación de los quelípedos, así como de porciones dorsales y ventrales del caparazón. Estos decápodos, recuperados de estratos del Eoceno medio de las Provincias de Barcelona y Girona, estaban asignados hasta ahora al género Stenodromia.
    [Show full text]
  • (Stomatopoda: Decapoda) Associated with the Deepwater
    Revista de Biología Tropical ISSN: 0034-7744 [email protected] Universidad de Costa Rica Costa Rica Wehrtmann, Ingo S.; Echeverría-Sáenz, Silvia Crustacean fauna (Stomatopoda: Decapoda) associated with the deepwater fishery of Heterocarpus vicarius (Decapoda: Pandalidae) along the Pacific coast of Costa Rica Revista de Biología Tropical, vol. 55, núm. 1, 2007, pp. 121-130 Universidad de Costa Rica San Pedro de Montes de Oca, Costa Rica Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=44909916 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative Crustacean fauna (Stomatopoda: Decapoda) associated with the deepwater fishery of Heterocarpus vicarius (Decapoda: Pandalidae) along the Pacific coast of Costa Rica Ingo S. Wehrtmann 1,2,3 & Silvia Echeverría-Sáenz 1 1 Escuela de Biología, 2 Museo de Zoología y 3 Centro de Investigaciones en Ciencias del Mar y Limnología (CIMAR), Universidad de Costa Rica, 2060 San José, Costa Rica; [email protected] Received 11-X-2005. Corrected 08-VIII-2006. Accepted 16-III-2007. Abstract: Commercial bottom trawling is a successful and commonly used method to catch marine shrimps. However, the shrimp fishing gears are poorly selective, and in addition to the target species they catch and retain large quantities of non-target species (bycatch). This study presents data concerning species composition and depth distribution of the crustacean fauna (stomatopods and decapods) associated with Heterocarpus vicarius catches from Pacific Costa Rica.
    [Show full text]
  • From the Bohol Sea, the Philippines
    THE RAFFLES BULLETIN OF ZOOLOGY 2008 RAFFLES BULLETIN OF ZOOLOGY 2008 56(2): 385–404 Date of Publication: 31 Aug.2008 © National University of Singapore NEW GENERA AND SPECIES OF EUXANTHINE CRABS (CRUSTACEA: DECAPODA: BRACHYURA: XANTHIDAE) FROM THE BOHOL SEA, THE PHILIPPINES Jose Christopher E. Mendoza Department of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, 14 Science Drive 4, Singapore 117543; Institute of Biology, University of the Philippines, Diliman, Quezon City, 1101, Philippines Email: [email protected] Peter K. L. Ng Department of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, 14 Science Drive 4, Singapore 117543, Republic of Singapore Email: [email protected] ABSTRACT. – Two new genera and four new xanthid crab species belonging to the subfamily Euxanthinae Alcock (Crustacea: Decapoda: Brachyura) are described from the Bohol Sea, central Philippines. Rizalthus, new genus, with just one species, R. anconis, new species, can be distinguished from allied genera by characters of the carapace, epistome, chelipeds, male abdomen and male fi rst gonopod. Visayax, new genus, contains two new species, V. osteodictyon and V. estampadori, and can be distinguished from similar genera using a combination of features of the carapace, epistome, thoracic sternum, male abdomen, pereiopods and male fi rst gonopod. A new species of Hepatoporus Serène, H. pumex, is also described. It is distinguished from congeners by the unique morphology of its front, carapace sculpturing, form of the subhepatic cavity and structure of the male fi rst gonopod. KEY WORDS. – Crustacea, Xanthidae, Euxanthinae, Rizalthus, Visayax, Hepatoporus, Panglao 2004, the Philippines. INTRODUCTION & Jeng, 2006; Anker et al., 2006; Dworschak, 2006; Marin & Chan, 2006; Ahyong & Ng, 2007; Anker & Dworschak, There are currently 24 genera and 83 species in the xanthid 2007; Manuel-Santos & Ng, 2007; Mendoza & Ng, 2007; crab subfamily Euxanthinae worldwide, with most occurring Ng & Castro, 2007; Ng & Manuel-Santos, 2007; Ng & in the Indo-Pacifi c (Ng & McLay, 2007; Ng et al., 2008).
    [Show full text]
  • Larval Morphology of the Spider Crab Leurocyclus Tuberculosus (Decapoda: Majoidea: Inachoididae)
    Nauplius 17(1): 49-58, 2009 49 Larval morphology of the spider crab Leurocyclus tuberculosus (Decapoda: Majoidea: Inachoididae) William Santana and Fernando Marques (WS) Museu de Zoologia, Universidade de São Paulo, Avenida Nazaré, 481, Ipiranga, 04263-000, São Paulo, SP, Brasil. E-mail: [email protected] (FM) Universidade de São Paulo, Departamento de Zoologia, Instituto de Biociências, Caixa Postal 11461, 05588-090, São Paulo, SP, Brasil. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract Within the recently resurrected family Inachoididae is Leurocyclus tuberculosus, an inachoidid spider crab distributed throughout the Western Atlantic of South America from Brazil to Argentina (including Patagonia), and along the Eastern Pacific coast of Chile. The larval development of L. tuberculosus consists of two zoeal stages and one megalopa. We observed that the larval morphology of L. tuberculosus conforms to the general pattern found in Majoidea by having two zoeal stages, in which the first stage has nine or more seta on the scaphognatite of the maxilla, and the second zoeal stage present well developed pleopods. Here, we describe the larval morphology of L. tuberculosus and compare with other inachoidid members for which we have larval information. Key words: Larval development, Majidae, Zoeal stages, Megalopa, Crustacea, Leurocyclus. Introduction described. Larval stages of Anasimus latus Rath- bun, 1894 was the first one to be described by Few decades ago, the family Inachoididae Sandifer and Van Engel (1972). Following, Web- Dana, 1851 was resurrected by Drach and Gui- ber and Wear (1981) and Terada (1983) described not (1983; see also Drach and Guinot, 1982), the first zoeal stage of Pyromaia tuberculata (Lock- who considered that the morphological modifica- ington, 1877), which was completely described tions on the carapace and endophragmal skeleton by Fransozo and Negreiros-Fransozo (1997) and among some majoid genera granted to a set of re-described by Luppi and Spivak (2003).
    [Show full text]
  • ICES Marine Science Symposia
    ICES mar. Sei. Symp., 199: 189-199. 1995 Distribution and abundance of molluscs and decapod crustaceans in trawl samples from the Galician Shelf (NW Spain) A. C. Farina and F. J. Pereiro Farina, A. C., and Pereiro, F. J. 1995. Distribution and abundance of molluscs and decapod crustaceans in trawl samples from the Galician Shelf (NW Spain). - ICES mar. Sei. Symp., 199: 189-199. This study presents the community composition and structure of molluscs and decapod crustaceans from trawl samples taken on the Galician Shelf in Northwest Spain. Spatial and temporal distribution, as well as the biomass and density of the main species, are presented in relation to depth and substrate type. A. C. Farina: Instituto Espanol Oceanografia, Apdo 130, 15080 La Coruna, Spain. F. J. Pereiro: Instituto Espanol Oceanografia, Apdo 1552, 36280 Vigo, Spain [tel: (+34) 98120 53 62, fax: (+34) 981 229077], Introduction with recruitment to the area (in the autumn) and the spawning season of the majority of the demersal and Two main groups of invertebrates (crustaceans and mol­ benthic species (in the spring). A stratified sampling luscs) are caught when trawling for fish on the Galician design was used and selection of the trawls was random. Shelf, which lies off northwestern Spain, reaching a The area is divided into three geographic sectors (Mino depth of 500 m 30 km from the coast along its southern to Finisterre, Finisterre to Estaca, and Estaca to Riba- part and broadening to 65 km from the coast in the deo), and each sector is divided into two strata by depth northern part.
    [Show full text]
  • Crustacea, Copepoda, Harpacticoida): Proposed Emendation of Spelling to ZOSIMEIDAE to Remove Homonymy with ZOSIMINAE Alcock, 1898 (Crustacea, Decapoda, XANTHIDAE)
    24 Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature 66(1) March 2009 Case 3467 ZOSIMIDAE Seifried, 2003 (Crustacea, Copepoda, Harpacticoida): proposed emendation of spelling to ZOSIMEIDAE to remove homonymy with ZOSIMINAE Alcock, 1898 (Crustacea, Decapoda, XANTHIDAE) Rony Huys and Paul F. Clark Department of Zoology, Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, U.K. (e-mail: [email protected] and [email protected]) Abstract. The purpose of this application, under Articles 29 and 55.3.1 of the Code, is to remove homonymy between the family-group names ZOSIMINAE Alcock, 1898 (Crustacea, Decapoda) and ZOSIMIDAE Seifried, 2003 (Crustacea, Copepoda) by changing the spelling of the junior homonym. It is proposed that the entire name Zosime Boeck, 1873 (Copepoda) be used to form ZOSIMEIDAE, leaving the stem of the senior homonym (based on the name Zosimus A.-G. Desmarest, 1823; Decapoda) unchanged. Zosimus A.-G. Desmarest, 1823 and Zosime Boeck, 1873 are respectively the type genera of ZOSIMINAE Alcock, 1898 (Decapoda) and ZOSIMIDAE Seifried, 2003 (Copepoda). Keywords. Nomenclature; taxonomy; Crustacea; Decapoda; Copepoda; Harpacti- coida; XANTHIDAE; ZOSIMEIDAE; ZOSIMIDAE; ZOSIMINAE; Zosime; Zosimus; Zosime typica; cosmopolitan. 1. Leach (1818) introduced the French vernacular names ‘Carpile’, ‘Clodorée’ (sic) and ‘Zosime’ for three genera of decapod crustaceans but did not include a descrip- tion, definition or indication of the taxa they denoted (Leach, 1818, pp. 74–75). Under Article 12 Leach’s names are nomina nuda and must be considered unavailable. 2. A.-G. Desmarest (1823, p. 228) latinised Leach’s (1818) vernacular names in a footnote to his text dealing with the genus Cancer, naming them Carpilius, Clorodius and Zosimus, respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • View, CMM-I-2126
    SYSTEMATICS AND PALEOECOLOGY OF MIOCENE PORTUNID AND CANCRID DECAPOD FOSSILS FROM THE ST. MARYS FORMATION, MARYLAND A thesis submitted To Kent State University in partial Fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Science by Heedar Bahman August, 2018 © Copyright All rights reserved Except for previously published materials Thesis written by Heedar Bahman B.S., Kuwait University, 2011 M.S., Kent State University, 2018 Approved by Rodney M. Feldmann , Ph.D., Advisor Daniel Holm , Ph.D., Chair, Department of Geology James L. Blank , Ph.D., Dean, College of Arts and Sciences TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................................... iii LIST OF FIGURES ........................................................................................................... iv LIST OF TABLES ............................................................................................................ vii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ............................................................................................... viii SUMMARY .........................................................................................................................1 INTRODUCTION ...............................................................................................................2 GEOLOGICAL SETTING ..................................................................................................5 METHODS ..........................................................................................................................7
    [Show full text]