DOCSLIB.ORG

County of Essex Transit Assessment Report, Phase 2 Project No

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
County of Essex Transit Assessment Report, Phase 2 Project No County of Essex Transit Assessment Report, Phase 2 Project No. 29-46B FINAL A u g u s t 2 0 1 1 Final Report Transit Solutions GENIVAR Consultants LP. 2800 Fourteenth Avenue, Suite 210, Markham, Ontario L3R 0E4 Telephone: 905.946.8900 Fax: 905.946.8966 www.genivar.com Contact: Dennis J. Fletcher, M.E.S. E-mail: [email protected] 29-46B August 8, 2011 Mr. T. Bateman County Engineer County of Essex 360 Fairview Avenue West Essex, ON N8M 1Y6 Re: Transit Assessment Report Phase 2 Final Report Dear Mr. Bateman: GENIVAR Inc. is pleased to present this final report on the implementation of transit services for the County of Essex. This report builds on the Phase 1 Feasibility Study submitted in April 2010, and identifies a detailed implementation plan for the short-term to operate inter-municipal transit services in the County. A brief summary of the major conclusions relevant to Phase 2 of the study are outlined in Section 1. This document refines the details in the Phase 2 Interim Report submitted in August 2010, and addresses the comments made by stakeholders, provides additional governance considerations, identifies an initial marketing strategy, and provides Transportation Demand Management mechanisms to encourage transit use. We hope this report provides a helpful source when you proceed with the next stage of work, and we hope to have the opportunity to work together soon. Yours truly, GENIVAR Inc. Dennis J. Fletcher, M.E.S. Director, Transit Solutions DJF/ml 2800 Fourteenth Avenue, Suite 210, Markham, Ontario L3R 0E4 Telephone: 905.946.8900 Fax: 905.946.8966 www.genivar.com Transit Assessment Report Phase 2 Final Report Table of Contents GENIVAR ii Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION...........................................................................................................................1 1.1 Phase 1 Summary Findings..........................................................................................1 1.1.1 Needs and Opportunities ................................................................................1 1.1.2 Performance Standards ..................................................................................2 1.1.3 Service Concepts............................................................................................2 1.1.4 Governance Options .......................................................................................4 1.2 Phase 2 Outline.............................................................................................................4 2. SERVICE STANDARDS ...............................................................................................................7 2.1 Service Design Standards.............................................................................................7 2.1.1 Service Coverage ...........................................................................................8 2.1.2 Hours of Service and Service Frequency .......................................................8 2.1.3 Route Performance Standards .......................................................................9 2.1.4 Vehicle Loading Standards .......................................................................... 10 2.1.5 On-Time Performance ................................................................................. 10 2.2 Performance Measures.............................................................................................. 11 2.2.1 Service Utilization ........................................................................................ 11 2.2.2 Amount of Service........................................................................................ 11 2.2.3 Financial Monitoring..................................................................................... 11 2.3 Other Guidelines ........................................................................................................ 12 2.3.1 New Services Guidelines ............................................................................. 12 2.3.2 System Accessibility Guidelines .................................................................. 12 2.4 Other System Improvement Considerations .............................................................. 13 3. PROPOSED SERVICES.............................................................................................................15 3.1 Short-Term Service Concept...................................................................................... 15 3.2 Option Development .................................................................................................. 15 3.2.1 Public and Stakeholder Consultation ........................................................... 15 3.3 Detailed Service Plan................................................................................................. 17 3.3.1 Urban Connectors........................................................................................ 18 3.3.2 Urban Fringe Local ...................................................................................... 20 3.4 Fare Policies .............................................................................................................. 26 3.4.1 Fare Zone Map ............................................................................................ 26 3.4.2 Fare Table.................................................................................................... 26 3.4.3 Corridor Service Fare Structures ................................................................. 27 3.4.4 Transfer Policies .......................................................................................... 28 3.5 Financial Plan............................................................................................................. 28 4. GOVERNANCE STRUCTURE ...................................................................................................31 4.1 Best Practice Review ................................................................................................. 31 4.1.1 Contract Administration................................................................................ 31 4.1.2 Service Planning .......................................................................................... 31 4.1.3 Customer Service and Marketing................................................................. 32 2800 Fourteenth Avenue, Suite 210, Markham, Ontario L3R 0E4 Telephone: 905.946.8900 Fax: 905.946.8966 www.genivar.com Transit Assessment Report Phase 2 Final Report Table of Contents 4.1.4 Farebox Revenue ........................................................................................ 32 4.2 Short-Term Governance Model.................................................................................. 35 4.2.1 Short-Term Governance Model Implementation.......................................... 35 4.2.2 Limitations of the Short-Term Governance Model ....................................... 38 4.3 Long-Term Governance Model .................................................................................. 38 4.3.1 Organizational Structure of the Authority ..................................................... 39 4.3.2 Responsibilities and Functions of the Authority ........................................... 40 5. COST ALLOCATION ..................................................................................................................43 5.1 County Levy vs. Municipal Tax .................................................................................. 43 5.2 Cost Allocation and Implications ................................................................................ 43 5.2.1 Urban Connectors........................................................................................ 43 5.2.2 Urban Fringe Locals..................................................................................... 43 Appendices Appendix A Transit Assessment Report Phase 1 Appendix B Service Design Options Appendix C Marketing Strategies Appendix D Transportation Demand Management GENIVAR ii Transit Assessment Report Phase 2 Final Report Table of Contents List of Exhibits Exhibit 1 – Performance Standard Measures................................................................................2 Exhibit 2 – Types of Services Identified.........................................................................................3 Exhibit 3 – Short-Term Concept Plan ............................................................................................3 Exhibit 5 – Hours of Service and Service Frequency Standards...................................................9 Exhibit 6 – Ridership Performance Standards............................................................................ 10 Exhibit 8 – Public Open Houses Held......................................................................................... 16 Exhibit 9 – Overall Transit Network ............................................................................................ 18 Exhibit 10 – Route 1 – Amherstburg–LaSalle–Windsor ............................................................. 19 Exhibit 11 – Route 2 – Lakeshore–Tecumseh–Windsor ............................................................ 22 Exhibit 12 – Route 3 – Leamington–Essex–Windsor ................................................................. 23 Exhibit 13 – Route 4 – Urban Fringe – South Local ................................................................... 24 Exhibit 14 – Route 5 – Urban
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Journals | Penn State Libraries Open Publishing
    I I • I • I• .1.1' D . , I * ' PA « ~** • * ' > . Mechanized streetcars rose out ofa need toreplace horse- the wide variety ofdifferent electric railway systems, no single drawn streetcars. The horse itselfpresented the greatest problems: system had yet emerged as the industry standard. Early lines horses could only work a few hours each day; they were expen- tended tobe underpowered and prone to frequent equipment sive to house, feed and clean up after; ifdisease broke out within a failure. The motors on electric cars tended to make them heavier stable, the result could be a financial catastrophe for a horsecar than either horsecars or cable cars, requiring a company to operator; and, they pulled the car at only 4 to 6 miles per hour. 2 replace its existing rails withheavier ones. Due to these circum- The expenses incurred inoperating a horsecar line were stances, electric streetcars could not yet meet the demands of staggering. For example, Boston's Metropolitan Railroad required densely populated areas, and were best operated along short 3,600 horses to operate its fleet of700 cars. The average working routes serving relatively small populations. life of a car horse was onlyfour years, and new horses cost $125 to The development of two rivaltechnological systems such as $200. Itwas common practice toprovide one stable hand for cable and electric streetcars can be explained by historian every 14 to 20horses inaddition to a staff ofblacksmiths and Thomas Parke Hughes's model ofsystem development. Inthis veterinarians, and the typical car horse consumed up to 30 pounds model, Hughes describes four distinct phases ofsystem growth: ofgrain per day.
    [Show full text]
  • Improving Travel Options in Small & Rural Communities
    TP 14945E Improving Travel Options in Small & Rural Communities This document was prepared for Transport Canada by Noxon Associates Limited. © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, represented by the Minister of Transport, 2009. Cette publication est aussi disponible en français sous le titre Améliorer les modes de déplacement dans les petites collectivités et les collectivités rurales. For a print copy or an accessible version of this publication, please visit http://transact- en.tc.gc.ca or contact Transport Canada’s Publications Order Desk at 1-888-830-4911 — International at 613-991-4071. An electronic version of this publication is available at www.tc.gc.ca/urban. TP 14945E Catalogue No. T22-184/2009E ISBN : 978-1-100-14336-1 Permission to reproduce Transport Canada grants permission to copy and/or reproduce the contents of this publication for personal and public non-commercial use. Users must reproduce the materials accurately, identify Transport Canada as the source and not present theirs as an official version, or as having been produced with the help or the endorsement of Transport Canada. To request permission to reproduce materials from this publication for commercial purposes, contact: Publishing and Depository Services Public Works and Government Services Canada Ottawa ON K1A 0S5 [email protected] Contents Part 1 INTRODUCTION ....................................................1! 1.1! Purpose of this guide........................................................................1! 1.2! Challenges
    [Show full text]
  • Town of Cochrane Transit Task Force Local Transit
    TOWN OF COCHRANE TRANSIT TASK FORCE LOCAL TRANSIT SERVICE RECOMMENDATION TO TOWN COUNCIL August 30, 2018 Contents Section 1: INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 3 Section 2: THE TRANSIT TASK FORCE ....................................................................................................... 8 Section 3: BACKGROUND.......................................................................................................................... 10 3.1 GreenTRIP Funding & Allocation .................................................................................................... 10 3.2 GreenTRIP Funding Conditions ....................................................................................................... 11 Section 4: FINANCIAL RISK ASSESSMENT .............................................................................................. 12 Section 5: PREVIOUS FIXED ROUTE OPTIONS ......................................................................................... 15 Section 6: THE RATIONAL OF PUBLIC TRANSIT ...................................................................................... 18 6.1 Local Transit Initial Assessment of Other Municipalities .............................................................. 18 6.2 Economic Rational for Transit ........................................................................................................ 21 6.3 Regional Traffic Congestion & Time and Fuel Savings ................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Committee of the Whole Tuesday, October 3, 2017 8:30 A.M
    Committee of the Whole Tuesday, October 3, 2017 8:30 a.m. Council Chambers, Town Hall 359 Main Street Agenda Call to Order 1. Approval of Agenda 2. Approval of Minutes: a. Committee of the Whole Minutes, September 5, 2017 3. Question Period Procedure: A thirty-minute time period will be provided for members of the public to address Council regarding questions, concerns and/or ideas. Each person will have a maximum of two minutes to address Council with a second two-minute time period provided if there is time remaining within the thirty- minute Public Input/Question Period timeframe. 4. Committee Reports (Internal) a. Audit Committee (1). Information Report: 1st Quarter Variance Report b. Town & Gown Committee c. RCMP Advisory Board (1). RFD 028-2017: RCMP Office Space d. Planning Advisory Committee (1). RFD 055-2017: MPS Amendments – 185 Main Street e. Environmental Sustainability Committee f. Emergency Management Advisory Committee 359 Main Street | Wolfville | NS | B4P 1A1 | t 902-542-5767 | f 902-542-4789 Wolfville.ca 5. Staff Reports for Discussion a. RFD 058-2017: MPS Amendments – Building Height, Downtown Parking and Neighbourhood Business b. Information Report: Residential Set Backs for Lounges 6. CAO Report 7. Committee Reports (External) a. Valley Waste Resource Management (VWRM) b. Kings Transit Authority (KTA) c. Kings Point-to-Point (KPPT) d. Valley Community Fibre Network (VCFN) e. Annapolis Valley Trails Coalition (AVTC) f. Wolfville Business Development Corporation (WBDC) g. Race Relations and Anti-Discrimination Committee (RRADC) 8. Adjournment to In Camera Meeting under section 22(2)(c)(g) of the Municipal Government Act – Personnel Matters/Legal Advice eligible for solicitor-client privilege a.
    [Show full text]
  • Cuta's 2006 Fall Conference
    February/février 2007 National Transit Employee Recognition Awards 2006 · Prix nationaux de reconnaissance des employés du secteur des transports en commun 2006 CANADIAN TRANSIT CANADIEN SUR LE TRANSPORT COLLECTIF CUTA’S 2006 FALL CONFERENCE COMMUNITIES IN TRANSIT CONGRÈS D’AUTOMNE DE L’ACTU 2006 COLLECTIVITÉS EN TRANSITION PLUS: 2006 Mid-Year Ridership Results Données semestrielles 2006 de l’achalandage Quick test fact: Q’Straint rear tie-down belts along with stainless steel floor pockets and fastening hardware are static pull tested with every shipment. www.qstraint.com 312983_Qstraint.indd 1 1/3/07 12:35:10 PM We Listen, You Drive Discover the new face of performance with the line of Nova Bus transit, suburban, and shuttle vehicles. Building on our reputation for quality, our bold new front styling reflects the sound engineering and unique design features you have come to expect from every vehicle we produce. At Nova Bus, the quality is built right in. We listen, You Drive. www.novabus.com 312983_Qstraint.indd 1 1/3/07 12:35:10 PM 311734_Nova.indd 1 12/11/06 10:35:40 AM Under 30' and 35' length 12 year/500,000 mile Altoona tested 102" wide Cummins ISB-02 engine 35" front door - Vapor Optional 42" centre door Allison B300 or B300R transmission 19 – 35 passenger capacity Meritor independent front suspension KIRKMAN BUS SALES LTD. BLUE BIRD PEARSON BUS 1-888-381-3010 COACHWORKS 1-877-794-7670 CALGARY, AB 1-800-486-7122 BRANTFORD, ON 4 WESTERN CANADA EASTERN CANADA February/février 2007 Vol. 17 No. 1 CANADIAN TRANSIT CANADIEN SUR LE TRANSPORT COLLECTIF February 2007/ février 2007 CUTA Editor • Rédactrice de l’ACTU : Maureen Shuell cover • couverture Executive Editor • Rédactrice en chef : Thanks to partnerships between the various orders of government, Janine Strom new funding is making significant improvements to public transit to Contributing Editor • meet the growing needs of Canadians.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of the Flat Fare Collection System Alternative
    SCRTD METRO RAIL PROJECT Preliminary Engineering ANALYSIS OF THE FLAT FARE COLLECTION SYSTEM ALTERNATIVE WES 16 CAE 11 Prepared by BOOZALLEN & HAMILTON INC. January 1984 SL\(ITA . TABLE OF CONTENTS Page SUMMARY i CHAPTER 1: Introduction 1 CHAPTER 2: Description of Alternatives 3 2.1 Adopted Graduated-Fare Collection System 3 2.2 Alternative Flat-Fare Collection System 6 CHAPTER 3: Evaluation of Alternatives 11 3.1 Capital Cost 11 3.2 Annual Operating and Maintenance Cost 15 3.3 System Reliability and Patron Convenience 18 3.4 Administrative Requirements 21 3.5 Ridership and Revenue 22 3.6 Fare Equity 26 CHAPTER 4: Conclusions 33 . StIIVINARY This report presents an analysis of the feasibility of instituting a flat-fare collection system for the Metro Rail line. Both the adopted graduated-fare collec- tion system and the alternative flat-fare system are described. The alternatives are then evaluated in terms of capital cost; annual O&1V1 cost; system reliability; passenger convenience; administrative requirements; ridership and revenue; and fare equity. The results of the analysis indicate several important conclusions. Relative to the graduated-fare system, a flat-fare system would result in capital cost savings of 47 percent and O&M cost savings of 18 percent. The flat- fare system would also be significantly more reliable, provide greater convenience to the patron, and enjoy slightly reduced administrative requirements. Moreover, the flat-fare system produces greater revenues: $2.0 million additional Metro Rail revenues and $17.7 million additional total SCRTD (bus and rail) revenues. Counterbalancing these advantages, however, is the fact that the flat-fare system is less equitable than the graduated-fare system.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report | East Hants Transit Services Business Plan I MMM Group Limited | March 2015
    Economic & Business Development Transit Services Business Plan RFP50035 Request for Proposal January 14, 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................ 1 2.0 BACKGROUND REVIEW AND BUSINESS PLAN SCOPE ............. 2 2.1 Corridor Feasibility Study Recommendations .............................................................. 2 2.2 Discussion of Recommendations .................................................................................. 2 2.3 Scope of the Transit Services Business Plan ............................................................... 4 3.0 SERVICE PLAN ................................................................................. 6 3.1 Route Concept .................................................................................................................. 6 3.2 Route Description ............................................................................................................ 8 3.3 Transit Stops ................................................................................................................... 11 3.4 Service Schedule ............................................................................................................ 15 3.5 Capital Infrastructure and Assets ................................................................................. 18 3.6 Transit Vehicle Procurement and Motor Carrier License Application ..................... 20 4.0 CONTRACTING TRANSIT SERVICES ..........................................
    [Show full text]
  • December 2010 Bulletin.Pub
    TheNEW YORK DIVISION BULLETIN - DECEMBER, 2010 Bulletin New York Division, Electric Railroaders’ Association Vol. 53, No. 12 December, 2010 The Bulletin THIRD AVENUE’S SOUTH FERRY BRANCH Published by the New DISCONTINUED 60 YEARS AGO York Division, Electric Railroaders’ Association, Third Avenue trains started running from Willets Point — 4 — 5 — Incorporated, PO Box South Ferry to Grand Central on August 26, Express 3001, New York, New 1878. At first, trains operated from 7:35 AM to Astoria Local — 8 (B) — 8 (B) — York 10008-3001. 8:00 PM leaving South Ferry. Trains operated on a 10-minute headway from 3:00 to 7:00 (A) Shuttles between Canal Street and South Ferry For general inquiries, PM and a 15-minute headway at other times. (B) Rerouted to City Hall September 18, 1939 contact us at nydiv@ Fare was 5 cents in the rush hour, 5:30-7:30 At Unification, June 12, 1940, Second Ave- erausa.org or by phone nue service was discontinued and replaced at (212) 986-4482 (voice AM and 5:00-7:00 PM, and 10 cents in non- rush hours. by midday Astoria Locals and rush hour Wil- mail available). The lets Point Expresses. The May 19, 1941 Division’s website is Second Avenue trains, which started run- www.erausa.org/ ning on March 1, 1880, did not run during the schedule provided for a 6-minute headway to nydiv.html. midnight hours. Third Avenue trains contin- Astoria. Expresses to Willets Point operated ued running to South Ferry during midnight on a 4-minute headway in the AM rush and a Editorial Staff: 5-minute headway in the evening rush.
    [Show full text]
  • Study on Medium Capacity Transit System Project in Metro Manila, the Republic of the Philippines
    Study on Economic Partnership Projects in Developing Countries in FY2014 Study on Medium Capacity Transit System Project in Metro Manila, The Republic of The Philippines Final Report February 2015 Prepared for: Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry Ernst & Young ShinNihon LLC Japan External Trade Organization Prepared by: TOSTEMS, Inc. Oriental Consultants Global Co., Ltd. Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd. Japan Transportation Planning Association Reproduction Prohibited Preface This report shows the result of “Study on Economic Partnership Projects in Developing Countries in FY2014” prepared by the study group of TOSTEMS, Inc., Oriental Consultants Global Co., Ltd., Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd. and Japan Transportation Planning Association for Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry. This study “Study on Medium Capacity Transit System Project in Metro Manila, The Republic of The Philippines” was conducted to examine the feasibility of the project which construct the medium capacity transit system to approximately 18km route from Sta. Mesa area through Mandaluyong City, Ortigas CBD and reach to Taytay City with project cost of 150 billion Yen. The project aim to reduce traffic congestion, strengthen the east-west axis by installing track-guided transport system and form the railway network with connecting existing and planning lines. We hope this study will contribute to the project implementation, and will become helpful for the relevant parties. February 2015 TOSTEMS, Inc. Oriental Consultants Global Co., Ltd. Mitsubishi Heavy
    [Show full text]
  • Li4577er1 Information Letter
    INFORMATION LETTER LI4577ER1 REFERENCE: Nova Bus Manuals APPLICATION DEADLINE:N/A SECTION: 04: ZF front axle SUBJECT: ZF product improvement of the front axle king pin and axial roller bearing. The repair kit parts will require a specific installation procedure. Current stock parts may JUSTIFICATION: still be used. DIRECT CHARGES LEVEL DESCRIPTION TIME LABOUR MATERIAL 1 – Client Client – 2 – – – – MATERIAL QTY PART NO REV. DESCRIPTION REPLACES PART N° LEVEL 1 1 N8909040 – King pin repair kit – LEVEL 2 – – – – – DISPOSAL OF PARTS DISCARDED * RETAINED * Dispose of the unused parts and the defective parts in REMOVED PARTS ARE: Yes – accordance with local environmental standards in effect. REVISION HISTORY REV. DATE CHANGE DESCRIPTION WRITTEN BY NR 2019AL29 Initial release André Pelletier R1 2019MA21 Repair kit number added to pages 1 and 16. Client list André Pelletier corrected. APPROVED BY: PAGE 1 OF 18 NQF772002 VERSION 3 INFORMATION LETTER LI4577ER1 ROAD NUMBER VIN (2NVY/4RKY...) CLIENT ORDER QTY FROM TO FROM TO Academy Bus - New Jersey L231 — — L82U563000166 L82U163000178 13 Academy Bus - New Jersey L333 — — L82U273000207 L82U473000211 5 Academy Bus - New Jersey L339 — — L82U483000047 L82U883000052 5 Academy Bus - New Jersey L340 — — L82U493000003 L82U193000007 5 Academy Busline - New Jersey LA13 — — L82J4G9775611 L82J5G9775620 10 Airdrie Transit - Alberta L664 — — L82U2B3000507 L82U2B3000507 1 Airdrie Transit - Alberta L759 — — L82U0D3000928 L82U0D3000928 1 Airdrie Transit Alberta LB10 3718 3718 L82J1J9776464 L82J1J9776464 1 Ames Transportation
    [Show full text]
  • Approval of Public Hearing Staff Report and Adoption of FY2020
    Finance and Capital Committee Action Item III-B March 14, 2019 Approval of Public Hearing Staff Report and adoption of FY2020 Operating Budget and FY2020-2025 CIP Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Board Action/Information Summary MEAD Number: Resolution: Action Information 202068 Yes No TITLE: Adopt FY2020 Operating Budget and FY2020-2025 CIP PRESENTATION SUMMARY: Staff will review feedback received from the public and equity analysis on the FY2020 Proposed Budget and request approval of the Public Outreach and Input Report, FY2020 Operating Budget and FY2020-2025 Capital Improvement Program (CIP). PURPOSE: The purpose of this item is to seek Board acceptance and approval of the Public Outreach and Input Report and Title VI equity analysis, and the FY2020 Operating Budget and FY2020-2025 CIP. DESCRIPTION: Budget Priorities: Keeping Metro Safe, Reliable and Affordable The budget is built upon the General Manager/CEO's Keeping Metro Safe, Reliable and Affordable (KMSRA) strategic plan. Metro is making major progress to achieve the goals of this plan by ramping up to average capital investment of $1.5 billion annually, establishing a dedicated capital trust fund exclusive to capital investment, and limiting jurisdictional annual capital funding growth to three percent. Metro continues to encourage the U.S. Congress to reauthorize the Passenger Rail Investment and Improvement Act (PRIIA) beyond FY2020, which provides $150 million in annual federal funds matched by $150 million from the District of Columbia, State of Maryland, and Commonwealth of Virginia. In order to establish a sustainable operating model, Metro is limiting jurisdictional operating subsidy growth to three percent and deploying innovative competitive contracting.
    [Show full text]
  • Peel Halton Transportation Study: Challenges and Opportunities
    Peel Halton Transportation Study Challenges and Opportunities PEEL HALTON TRANSPORTATION STUDY: CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES 1 Contents Acknowledgements DISSEMINATION PARTNERS: We would like to express our sincere ACCES Employment gratitude to the following individuals 1. Executive Summary 3 Brampton Economic Development and organizations who contributed to Burlington Chamber of Commerce 2. Literature Review 5 the design and/or dissemination of this Caledon Economic Development survey. Their guidance and support was Centre for Education & Training 3. Primary Data Analysis 13 invaluable. Centre for Skills Development 4. Secondary Data Analysis 16 College Boreal ADVISORY GROUP PARTICIPANTS: 5. Case Study 1 23 COSTI Immigrant Services Yousef Kimiagar – Town of Innisfil Powered by Uber Dixie Bloor Neighbourhood Centre Hatch Family Services of Peel 6. Case Study 2 26 Tony D’Alessandro HMC Connections – Pantonium: On-Demand Transit Town of Milton HRPA – Halton in Belleville, Ontario HRPA – Peel Tori Bellwood Humber Community Employment 7. Case Study 3 28 Gordon Food Service Services – Region of Peel: Grace Scire Indus Community Services Employer Individualized Marketing (EIM) Caledon Community Services Job Skills 8. Transportation Forum 30 Soo Min Toh Job Start John Howard Society 9. Conclusion 32 University of Toronto Mississauga Landscape Ontario Martin Bohl 10. Recommendations 33 Newcomer Centre of Peel City of Brampton Oakville Chamber of Commerce Ben Roberts Peel Multicultural Council Town of Caledon Peel Newcomer Strategy Group Patti Williams Polycultural Immigrant & Community Services Zip Signs Region of Peel Sheridan College Supply Chain Management Association Ontario (SCMAO) Peel Halton Transportation Study: Challenges and Opportunities The Centre for Skills Development Published by the Peel Halton Workforce Development Group, March 2020.
    [Show full text]