DOCSLIB.ORG

10B-FY2020-Budget-Adoption-FINALIZED.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
10B-FY2020-Budget-Adoption-FINALIZED.Pdf Report by Finance and Capital Committee (B) 03-28-2019 Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Board Action/Information Summary MEAD Number: Resolution: Action Information 202068 Yes No TITLE: Adopt FY2020 Operating Budget and FY2020-2025 CIP PRESENTATION SUMMARY: Staff will review feedback received from the public and equity analysis on the FY2020 Proposed Budget and request approval of the Public Outreach and Input Report, FY2020 Operating Budget and FY2020-2025 Capital Improvement Program (CIP). PURPOSE: The purpose of this item is to seek Board acceptance and approval of the Public Outreach and Input Report and Title VI equity analysis, and the FY2020 Operating Budget and FY2020-2025 CIP. DESCRIPTION: Budget Priorities: Keeping Metro Safe, Reliable and Affordable The budget is built upon the General Manager/CEO's Keeping Metro Safe, Reliable and Affordable (KMSRA) strategic plan. Metro is making major progress to achieve the goals of this plan by ramping up to average capital investment of $1.5 billion annually, establishing a dedicated capital trust fund exclusive to capital investment, and limiting jurisdictional annual capital funding growth to three percent. Metro continues to encourage the U.S. Congress to reauthorize the Passenger Rail Investment and Improvement Act (PRIIA) beyond FY2020, which provides $150 million in annual federal funds matched by $150 million from the District of Columbia, State of Maryland, and Commonwealth of Virginia. In order to establish a sustainable operating model, Metro is limiting jurisdictional operating subsidy growth to three percent and deploying innovative competitive contracting. The items on the KMSRA agenda that remain to be completed include restructuring retirement benefits and creating a Rainy Day Fund. Key Highlights: The FY2020 Budget totals $3.5 billion, including $2.0 billion of operating expenses and $1.5 billion in capital program spending in FY2020. In the interest of demonstrating compliance with new restrictions in Maryland and Virginia dedicated revenue legislation, the FY2020 Budget is broken down as follows: a base budget which reflects a 3 percent subsidy growth cap including customer/ridership initiatives, and items legislatively excluded from the subsidy cap. The total operating subsidy, including capped subsidy and legislative exclusions, is $1.1 billion. The budget is designed to attract new customers and deliver better service for current riders, by increasing service, making passes more affordable without raising fares or cutting existing services. Outreach Results: Service and fare proposals included in the FY2020 Budget received favorable support from customers during public outreach, particularly those proposals that would improve rail service. Among the most popular proposals were extending the Red and Yellow lines. For the low-income customers surveyed, support for these proposals was nearly twice the level of support for extending rush hour service levels. Customers also expressed support for unlimited ride Metrorail passes; four in 10 were "highly interested" in having this product. Initiatives Included in Budget: Consistent with comments from the Finance and Capital Committee and public feedback received during outreach efforts, the final budget proposal before the Board for approval includes extending the Yellow Line to Greenbelt to double rush-hour service at nine stations, running all Red Line trains to Glenmont to double service at an additional three stations and enhancing the value of Metro unlimited bus and rail passes. These customer service improvements are in addition to the General Manager's original FY2020 budget proposal that included the enhancement of Metro’s industry-first “Rush Hour Promise” for unscheduled delays of 10 minutes or more and other initiatives like automatic train operation to give customers a smoother and more reliable ride. Title VI Analysis: In accordance with Federal Transit Administration (FTA) regulations, any major service change or any change in fares must undergo a Title VI equity analysis to evaluate the impacts of the proposed changes on minority and low-income populations. The FY2020 Budget does not have a Disparate Impact on minority populations nor cause a Disproportionate Burden on low-income populations. The complete FY2020 Budget Title VI Equity Analysis is included as an attachment to the resolution for this item. Background and History: FY2020 Budget Priorities are the following: FY2020-2025 Capital Improvement Program z Fully fund system safety and compliance z Improve the customer experience z Continue focus on system preservation and State of Good Repair z Meet program budget and schedule z Ramp up to $1.5 billion average annual program z Develop capital investment pipeline (D&E) Operating Budget z Increase ridership z Improve the customer experience z Maximize operating efficiency z Increase non-fare revenues z Enhance employee engagement and development z Comply with Dedicated Revenue restrictions Discussion: The FY2020 Operating Budget totals $2.0 billion in FY2020. The FY2020 Base Budget has no fare increases and includes new initiatives to grow ridership and revenue with extensions of Yellow and Red Lines as well as pass product changes. Management actions of $47 million are required to reduce subsidy growth to within the 3 percent cap in the Base Budget. The budget includes $14 million for mandates legislatively excluded from the cap, including litigation, ADA paratransit, occupational safety and health and jurisdiction-requested bus service. The recommended FY2020 Capital Budget of $1.5 billion and six-year capital plan of $9.2 billion include investment in ongoing projects, prioritized system preservation and renewal needs from the Capital Needs Inventory. The six-year plan includes $450 million of reimbursable projects such as the Silver Line, the Potomac Yard infill station, and the Purple Line. PRIIA funding ends in Federal FY2019; without reauthorization from Congress, capital contributions from jurisdictions could increase by nearly $750 million over five years. With PRIIA, Jurisdictional Match and System Performance requirements will total $2.6 billion over six years. Without PRIIA, Jurisdictional Match and System Performance will increase to $3.3 billion over that time frame. New Initiatives: Pass adjustments to encourage ridership included in the FY2020 Budget: z Reduce 7-Day Bus Pass ($17.50 to $15) z Reduce 1-Day Visitor Pass Price ($14.75 to $13) z Reduce 7-Day Visitor Pass Price ($38.50 to $38 on short-trip (up to $3.85 per trip) and $60 to $58 on full system pass) z Add a 3-Day Weekday Pass ($28) z Add unlimited bus in all Visitor and SelectPasses New service initiatives to drive ridership growth include: Extend Yellow Line service to Greenbelt. Today, Yellow Line trains turn back at Mt. Vernon Square during rush hours and at Fort Totten at all other times. The GM’s budget recommendation would extend every Yellow Line train to Greenbelt, which would double service during rush hours and address current crowding conditions at the nine stations north of Mt Vernon Square (Shaw-Howard, U Street, Columbia Heights, Georgia Ave-Petworth, Fort Totten, West Hyattsville, Prince George’s Plaza, College Park, and Greenbelt). During off-peak times, the four stations north of Fort Totten would see an increase in service. Many current Green Line customers traveling to Yellow Line stations in Virginia (e.g. Reagan National Airport) would be able to make the trip without changing trains. Extend Red Line service to Glenmont. Currently, some Red Line trains turn back at Silver Spring, while others operate to the end of the line at Glenmont. To simplify Metro’s service pattern for customers while increasing service at three Red Line stations, the FY2020 Budget includes funding to run all Red Line trains to Glenmont. As a result, service levels will double at three stations: Forest Glen, Wheaton and Glenmont. Budget Risks: Metro receives $150 million in dedicated federal grant funding authorized by the Passenger Rail Investment and Improvement Act (PRIIA) each year, matched by $50 million each from the District of Columbia, State of Maryland and Commonwealth of Virginia, for a total of $300 million annually that funds critical safety and state of good repair improvements. Federal FY2019 is the last year of authorization for these funds and with approval of the budget, staff will submit applications for these grants beginning next month, for use in FY2020. Federal legislation is needed to authorize funding for use in FY2021 and beyond. With the creation of the dedicated funding stream to support capital investments, Metro needs an operating contingency reserve fund to better position the Authority to deal with unpredictable financial shocks. This fund will insulate jurisdictions from the added costs of major disruptions to Metro’s operating budget, including weather and other major events in the D.C. region. The FY2020 Budget assumes ridership will stabilize from FY2019 budget levels. Ridership declines would create revenue shortfalls in the budget. Bus revenues also continue to decline, due in part to fare evasion. Recent legislation to decriminalize fare evasion may further erode revenues. For MetroAccess, the paratransit service required by the Americans with Disabilities Act, the FY2020 Budget assumes no increase in ridership. As the FY2020 subsidy per passenger for MetroAccess is more than $65, even a modest increase in ridership could require additional subsidy contributions.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Forest Glen Apartments Montgomery County, Maryland August 14, 2020
    Forest Glen Apartments Montgomery County, Maryland August 14, 2020 Traffic Impact Analysis Prepared for: Montgomery Housing Partnership, Inc. Mr. Donald R. Hague 12200 Tech Road, Suite 250 Silver Spring, MD 20904 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY OF FINDINGS ............................................................... 1 EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS ....................................................................................... 3 1 Site Location Map ........................................................................................................ 6 1A Site Plan ....................................................................................................................... 7 2 Existing Lane Use ......................................................................................................... 8 3A Existing Peak Hour Traffic Volumes ............................................................................. 9 3B Updated Existing Peak Hour Traffic Volumes ............................................................ 10 3C Existing Peak Hour Pedestrian Volumes .................................................................... 11 4 Existing Pedestrian, Bicycle, and Transit Facilities ..................................................... 12 4A Results of Pedestrian Crossing Timing Analysis ......................................................... 13 TOTAL TRAFFIC CONDITIONS ......................................................................................... 14 5 Trip Generation for Subject Site
    [Show full text]
  • Amazon's HQ2 Decision
    RESEARCH JULY 2019 AMAZON’S HQ2: AN UPDATE ON ITS IMPACT ON THE WASHINGTON COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE MARKET AMAZON HAS ARRIVED PROJECT’S PUBLIC COST AND INCENTIVES More than seven months after announcing its decision to locate one half of its “HQ2” in National Landing, Amazon’s plans for its new campus are • Amazon will receive $550 million in workforce cash grants coming into focus. Amazon has signed leases at four buildings in from the Commonwealth of Virginia for the creation of National Landing totaling approximately 585,000 square feet. Amazon 25,000 new jobs. Additionally, Amazon can receive up to has moved into 47,512 square feet at 2345 Crystal Drive as it quickly $200 million in grants if it delivers on an additional 12,850 begins its hiring process for HQ2, and will occupy 88,000 square feet at jobs beyond the initial requirement. 241 18th Street South, 191,000 square feet at 1800 South Bell Street and 258,000 square feet at 1770 Crystal Drive as renovations at each location • Amazon will receive a cash grant of $23 million from finish. Working with JBG Smith, the largest property owner in National Arlington County for the incremental growth of an existing Landing and Amazon’s development partner, property manager and retail local Transient Occupancy Tax over the next 15 years. leasing agent, Amazon has begun to build out its workforce. Amazon is investing upwards of $95 million in tenant renovations. Notably, 1770 • The Commonwealth of Virginia has pledged $250 million Crystal Drive, where it will occupy the entirety of the 258,000 square foot towards Virginia Tech’s $1 billion investment in a new building, will make up a majority of the renovations, accounting for $80 campus proximate to Amazon’s new headquarters, which million of the total amount.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Hearings on Proposed Fy2016 Fare Changes, Service Changes, and Capital Improvement Program
    PRESENTED AND ADOPTED: February 26, 2015 SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARINGS ON PROPOSED FY2016 FARE CHANGES, SERVICE CHANGES, AND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 2015-11 RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY WHEREAS, The Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMATA) provides Metrobus, Metrorail, and MetroAccess services to the residents of the region; and WHEREAS, These services combine to provide over 340 million passenger trips per year; and WHEREAS, The operating cost of Metrobus, Metrorail, and MetroAccess services is funded in part by passenger and other operating revenues and in part by subsidies provided by the District of Columbia, the State of Maryland, local jurisdictions in Virginia, and the Commonwealth of Virginia; and WHEREAS, The Interim General Manager/Chief Executive Officer's (GM/CEO) current proposed Fiscal Year (FY)2016 budget forecasts operating expense growth in an amount greater than the growth in passenger and other operating revenues, leading to a substantial increase in proposed local jurisdictional subsidy compared to FY2015; and WHEREAS, The Board of Directors has considered a range of options for reducing the required local jurisdictional subsidy in the FY2016 budget, including administrative expense reductions, one-time funding sources, fare increases, and major service changes, but has determined that fare increases and major service changes are not required in FY2016; and WHEREAS, The Board of Directors has determined that other minor changes to WMATA's fare structure and parking fees in FY2016, as well as a limited set of Metrobus service changes in Maryland, are appropriate for public consideration; WHEREAS, The proposed changes to fares and fees and the proposed changes in bus service require a public hearing pursuant to the WMATA Compact; and WHEREAS, In order to meet Board-established deadlines for public hearing and public participation, staff must begin work immediately following adoption of this Resolution; and Motioned by Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • [Title Over Two Lines (Shift+Enter to Break Line)]
    BUS TRANSFORMATION PROJECT White Paper #2: Strategic Considerations October 2018 DRAFT: For discussion purposes 1 1 I• Purpose of White Paper II• Vision & goals for bus as voiced by stakeholders III• Key definitions IV• Strategic considerations Table of V• Deep-dive chapters to support each strategic consideration Contents 1. What is the role of Buses in the region? 2. Level of regional commitment to speeding up Buses? 3. Regional governance / delivery model for bus? 4. What business should Metrobus be in? 5. What services should Metrobus operate? 6. How should Metrobus operate? VI• Appendix: Elasticity of demand for bus 2 DRAFT: For discussion purposes I. Purpose of White Paper 3 DRAFT: For discussion purposes Purpose of White Paper 1. Present a set of strategic 2. Provide supporting analyses 3. Enable the Executive considerations for regional relevant to each consideration Steering Committee (ESC) to bus transformation in a neutral manner set a strategic direction for bus in the region 4 DRAFT: For discussion purposes This paper is a thought piece; it is intended to serve as a starting point for discussion and a means to frame the ensuing debate 1. Present a The strategic considerations in this paper are not an set of strategic exhaustive list of all decisions to be made during this considerations process; they are a set of high-level choices for the Bus Transformation Project to consider at this phase of for regional strategy development bus transformation Decisions on each of these considerations will require trade-offs to be continually assessed throughout this effort 5 DRAFT: For discussion purposes Each strategic consideration in the paper is 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Proposed Program of High Capacity Transit Improvements City of Atlanta DRAFT
    Proposed Program of High Capacity Transit Improvements City of Atlanta DRAFT Estimated Capital Cost (Base Year in Estimated O&M Cost (Base Year in Millions) Millions) Project Description Total Miles Local Federal O&M Cost Over 20 Total Capital Cost Annual O&M Cost Share Share Years Two (2) miles of heavy rail transit (HRT) from HE Holmes station to a I‐20 West Heavy Rail Transit 2 $250.0 $250.0 $500.0 $13.0 $312.0 new station at MLK Jr Dr and I‐285 Seven (7) miles of BRT from the Atlanta Metropolitan State College Northside Drive Bus Rapid Transit (south of I‐20) to a new regional bus system transfer point at I‐75 7 $40.0 N/A $40.0 $7.0 $168.0 north Clifton Light Rail Four (4) miles of grade separated light rail transit (LRT) service from 4 $600.0 $600.0 $1,200.0 $10.0 $240.0 Contingent Multi‐ Transit* Lindbergh station to a new station at Emory Rollins Jurisdicitional Projects I‐20 East Bus Rapid Three (3) miles of bus rapid transit (BRT) service from Five Points to 3 $28.0 $12.0 $40.0 $3.0 $72.0 Transit* Moreland Ave with two (2) new stops and one new station Atlanta BeltLine Twenty‐two (22) miles of bi‐directional at‐grade light rail transit (LRT) 22 $830 $830 $1,660 $44.0 $1,056.0 Central Loop service along the Atlanta BeltLine corridor Over three (3) miles of bi‐directional in‐street running light rail transit Irwin – AUC Line (LRT) service along Fair St/MLK Jr Dr/Luckie St/Auburn 3.4 $153 $153 $306.00 $7.0 $168.0 Ave/Edgewood Ave/Irwin St Over two (2) miles of in‐street bi‐directional running light rail transit Downtown – Capitol
    [Show full text]
  • City of Milwaukee, Wis. Environmental Assessment October 2011
    City of Milwaukee, Wis. Environmental Assessment October 2011 Prepared by the City of Milwaukee in cooperation with the Federal Transit Administration (THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK) Milwaukee Streetcar Environmental Assessment ii October 2011 RESPONSIBLE AGENCIES Lead Agency: Federal Transit Administration Project Sponsors: City of Milwaukee WHERE TO FIND COPIES OF THIS DOCUMENT A hard copy of the document is available for public inspection at the Federal Transit Administration field office at the following location: Federal Transit Administration Region V 200 West Adams Street, Suite 320 Chicago, Illinois 60606 Hard copies of the document will also be available at the following locations: Milwaukee Public Library – Central Milwaukee Public Library – Center Street 814 W. Wisconsin Avenue 2727 W. Fond du Lac Avenue Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53233 Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53210 Milwaukee Public Library – Forest Home Milwaukee Department of City Development 1432 W. Forest Home Avenue 809 Broadway, 1st Floor Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53204 Milwaukee, WI 53202 Legislative Reference Bureau, Milwaukee City Hall City Hall, Room B-11 200 East Wells Street Milwaukee, WI 53202 To view an electronic copy of this document, please visit the project Web site at www.themilwaukeestreetcar.com. CONTACT INFORMATION For additional information concerning this document please contact our public involvement coordinator who can direct your questions and comments to the appropriate person: Lois Kimmelman, Environmental Protection Specialist Federal Transit Administration Region 5 200 West Adams St., Suite 320 Chicago, IL 60606 Kristine Martinsek, Milwaukee Streetcar Public Involvement Coordinator Martinsek and Associates 1325 E. Potter Avenue Milwaukee, WI 53207 Milwaukee Streetcar Environmental Assessment iii October 2011 ABSTRACT The proposed Milwaukee Streetcar project would establish a starter streetcar system in and around downtown Milwaukee connecting workers, visitors and residents to key destinations and attractions.
    [Show full text]
  • Journals | Penn State Libraries Open Publishing
    I I • I • I• .1.1' D . , I * ' PA « ~** • * ' > . Mechanized streetcars rose out ofa need toreplace horse- the wide variety ofdifferent electric railway systems, no single drawn streetcars. The horse itselfpresented the greatest problems: system had yet emerged as the industry standard. Early lines horses could only work a few hours each day; they were expen- tended tobe underpowered and prone to frequent equipment sive to house, feed and clean up after; ifdisease broke out within a failure. The motors on electric cars tended to make them heavier stable, the result could be a financial catastrophe for a horsecar than either horsecars or cable cars, requiring a company to operator; and, they pulled the car at only 4 to 6 miles per hour. 2 replace its existing rails withheavier ones. Due to these circum- The expenses incurred inoperating a horsecar line were stances, electric streetcars could not yet meet the demands of staggering. For example, Boston's Metropolitan Railroad required densely populated areas, and were best operated along short 3,600 horses to operate its fleet of700 cars. The average working routes serving relatively small populations. life of a car horse was onlyfour years, and new horses cost $125 to The development of two rivaltechnological systems such as $200. Itwas common practice toprovide one stable hand for cable and electric streetcars can be explained by historian every 14 to 20horses inaddition to a staff ofblacksmiths and Thomas Parke Hughes's model ofsystem development. Inthis veterinarians, and the typical car horse consumed up to 30 pounds model, Hughes describes four distinct phases ofsystem growth: ofgrain per day.
    [Show full text]
  • Maple Grove Transit 2016 “Expressbusservice”
    Maple Grove Transit 2016 “Express Bus Service” Customer Survey Report of Results December 2016 Prepared by: 2955 Valmont Road • Suite 300 • Boulder, Colorado 80301 • t: 303-444-7863 • www.n-r-c.com Maple Grove Transit “Express Bus Service” Customer Survey December 2016 Table of Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................... 1 Survey Background ...................................................................................................................4 Survey Results ...........................................................................................................................4 Appendix A: Verbatim Responses to Open-ended Survey Questions .................................... 34 Appendix B: Select Results Compared by Respondent Race/Ethnicity .................................. 92 Appendix C: Copy of Survey Questionnaire .......................................................................... 107 National Research Center, Inc. Report of Results Prepared by Maple Grove Transit “Express Bus Service” Customer Survey December 2016 List of Tables Table 1: Question 1................................................................................................................................................ 4 Table 2: Question 2 ............................................................................................................................................... 4 Table 3: Question 3 Compared by Question 1 ....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • WMATA State of Good Repair Years of Underfunding and Tremendous
    RECOMMENDATIONS WMATA State of Good Repair Years of underfunding and tremendous regional growth have resulted in underinvestment and significant deterioration of the Washington Metrorail’s core transit infrastructure and assets, creating substantial obstacles to consistently delivering safe, reliable, and resilient service to its customers. In an effort to bring the system up to a state of good repair, WMATA created Momentum, a strategic 10-year plan that has set short-term and long-term actions to accelerate core capital investment in state of good repair and sustain investment into the future. Momentum identifies a $6 billion list of immediate and critical capital investments, called Metro 2025, aimed at (1) maximizing the existing rail system by operating all 8-car trains during rush hour, (2) improving high-volume rail transfer stations and underground pedestrian connections, (3) enhancing bus service, (4) restoring peak service connections, (5) integrating fare technology across the region’s multiple transit operators and upgrading communication systems, (6) expanding the bus fleet and storage and maintenance facilities, and (7) improving the flexibility of the transit infrastructure. With the first capital investment alone, WMATA estimates a capacity increase of 35,000 more passengers per hour during rush hour, which is the equivalent of building 18 new lanes of highway in Washington, DC. The second investment is a “quick win” to relieve crowding in the system’s largest bottlenecks and bring its most valuable core infrastructure up to a state of good repair. MTA Transportation Reinvention Commission Report ~ 31 ~ RECOMMENDATIONS Improving the System: Régie Autonome des Transports Parisiens (RATP) and Transport for London (TfL) Major cities around the world, notably London and Paris, are investing in their core system by maintaining and renewing their assets.
    [Show full text]
  • Wisdot State Management Plan for Transit
    State Management Plan For the following federal programs: 49 U.S.C. § 5304 – Statewide Planning 49 U.S.C. § 5310 – Enhanced Mobility of Seniors and Individuals with Disabilities 49 U.S.C. § 5311 – Formula Grants for Rural Areas 49 U.S.C. § 5339 – Bus and Bus Facilities Prepared by the Public and Specialized Transit Section Bureau of Transit, Local Roads, Railroads, and Harbors Division of Transportation Investment Management Wisconsin Department of Transportation Date: May 18, 2020 Wisconsin Department of Transportation 1 State Management Plan for Federal Transit Programs Contact information: Ian Ritz, Chief Public and Specialized Transit Section 4822 Madison Yards Way, 6th Floor South Madison, WI 53705 608-266-0189 [email protected] This document is available in alternate formats upon request. Date: May 18, 2020 Wisconsin Department of Transportation 2 State Management Plan for Federal Transit Programs TABLE OF CONTENTS DEFINITIONS and ACRONYMS ........................................................................................................................ 4 FORWARD ........................................................................................................................................................... 6 PLAN CONTENT .................................................................................................................................................. 7 A. PROGRAM GOALS AND OBJECTIVES .................................................................................................... 7 B. ROLES AND
    [Show full text]
  • Print Untitled (24 Pages)
    MINNESOTA AVENUE METRORAIL STATION ACCESS IMPROVEMENT STUDY e lor a Jd I 1 let , 1t V r 7th t r ntElr Union ~D woo StatlOr .M!JI~ Minnesota Ave WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY OFFICE OF BUSINESS PLANNING AND PROJECT DEVELOPMENT PRE·FINAL AUGUST 2005 MINNESOTA AVENUE STATION ACCESS IMPROVEMENT STUDY Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 1 Figures Background ............................................................................................................................. 1 Figure 1: Aerial View of Station Minnesota Avenue Station and Anacostia River ....................... 1 Study Purpose ........................................................................................................................ 1 Figure 2: Other Transportation Studies ....................................................................................... 2 Planning Context ..................................................................................................................... 1 Figure 3: Pedestrians Crossing Minnesota Avenue .................................................................... 3 Relationship to Other Transportation Studies ......................................................................... 2 Figure 4: Minnesota Avenue Station Area and Facilities ............................................................. 4 Existing Conditions ...................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 1200 N Henry St (Route 1) // Old Town Alexandria, VA 22314
    1200 N Henry St (Route 1) // Old Town Alexandria, VA 22314 20,100 SF Anchor Space Available For More Matt Skalet Dimitri Georgelakos 5225 Wisconsin Avenue, NW Information, [email protected] [email protected] Suite 600 Please Contact: 202.420.7775 703.288.2999 Washington, DC 20015 1200 N Henry St (Route 1) // Old Town Alexandria, VA 22314 Property Highlights: Demographic Snapshot // 2017: > Billboard opportunity for 20,100 SF anchor space on Route 1 .25-Mile 1-Mile 2-Mile /North Henry (47,000 ADT) Population 2,851 28,020 73,938 > Conveniently located between downtown Old Town and Daytime Population 1,552 37,888 74,242 Potomac Yards Average HH Income $154,447 $166,189 $155,499 > 1st floor of 109 unit resid ential building > 89 dedicated retail parking spaces. There will be additional on street Traffic Counts // 2017: parking on newly constructed Fayette Street Henry St (Route 1) 47,000 (ADT) For More Matt Skalet Dimitri Georgelakos 52255225 Wisconsin Wisconsin Avenue, Ave, NW NW Information, [email protected] [email protected] SuiteSuite 600 600 Please Contact: 202.420.7775 703.288.2999 Washington,Washington, DC DC 20015 20015 1200 N Henry St (Route 1) // Old Town Alexandria, VA 22314 GROUND FLOOR N FAYETTE ST. N FAYETTE Retail 20,100 PROPOSED NORTH HENRY (ROUTE 1) 47,00 ADT FULL ACCESS RETAIL PARKING N FAYETTE ST. N FAYETTE 89 SPACES PROPOSED NORTH HENRY (ROUTE 1) 47,00 ADT FULL ACCESS Site Plan For More Matt Skalet Dimitri Georgelakos 5225 Wisconsin Avenue, NW Information, [email protected] [email protected] Suite 600 Please
    [Show full text]