DOCSLIB.ORG

City of Milwaukee, Wis. Environmental Assessment October 2011

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

City of Milwaukee, Wis. Environmental Assessment October 2011 Prepared by the City of Milwaukee in cooperation with the Federal Transit Administration (THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK) Milwaukee Streetcar Environmental Assessment ii October 2011 RESPONSIBLE AGENCIES Lead Agency: Federal Transit Administration Project Sponsors: City of Milwaukee WHERE TO FIND COPIES OF THIS DOCUMENT A hard copy of the document is available for public inspection at the Federal Transit Administration field office at the following location: Federal Transit Administration Region V 200 West Adams Street, Suite 320 Chicago, Illinois 60606 Hard copies of the document will also be available at the following locations: Milwaukee Public Library – Central Milwaukee Public Library – Center Street 814 W. Wisconsin Avenue 2727 W. Fond du Lac Avenue Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53233 Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53210 Milwaukee Public Library – Forest Home Milwaukee Department of City Development 1432 W. Forest Home Avenue 809 Broadway, 1st Floor Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53204 Milwaukee, WI 53202 Legislative Reference Bureau, Milwaukee City Hall City Hall, Room B-11 200 East Wells Street Milwaukee, WI 53202 To view an electronic copy of this document, please visit the project Web site at www.themilwaukeestreetcar.com. CONTACT INFORMATION For additional information concerning this document please contact our public involvement coordinator who can direct your questions and comments to the appropriate person: Lois Kimmelman, Environmental Protection Specialist Federal Transit Administration Region 5 200 West Adams St., Suite 320 Chicago, IL 60606 Kristine Martinsek, Milwaukee Streetcar Public Involvement Coordinator Martinsek and Associates 1325 E. Potter Avenue Milwaukee, WI 53207 Milwaukee Streetcar Environmental Assessment iii October 2011 ABSTRACT The proposed Milwaukee Streetcar project would establish a starter streetcar system in and around downtown Milwaukee connecting workers, visitors and residents to key destinations and attractions. This Environmental Assessment (EA) considers the effects of a streetcar starter system in the City of Milwaukee. The alternative reviewed in the EA was selected through an Alternatives Analysis conducted as part of the Milwaukee Streetcar project. This analysis resulted in a recommended locally preferred alternative (LPA) that provides streetcar service from the Milwaukee Intermodal Station on St. Paul Avenue, through downtown to Ogden Street on the City’s northeast side (initial route). Proposed route extensions could expand the system north along 4th Street on the west side of the Milwaukee River and along the Prospect and Farwell corridors to the Brady Street area. This EA considers the potential short-term and long-term effects of the project including social and economic factors, physical factors and indirect and cumulative effects. The analysis also includes a summary of the project’s public involvement activities and describes the project’s cost estimates. SUBMITTING COMMENTS Comments on this environmental assessment must be received at the City of Milwaukee by 5:00 PM CST, Friday, December 2, 2011. Comments may be submitted to the City of Milwaukee via the project website: [email protected] or in writing to the following address: Public Information Manager 1325 E. Potter Avenue Milwaukee, WI 53207 Milwaukee Streetcar Environmental Assessment iv October 2011 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Purpose and Need ......................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Alternatives Analysis .................................................................................................................... 1 1.2.1 Locally Preferred Alternative (LPA) .................................................................................... 2 1.3 Environmental Resources, Impacts and Mitigation ...................................................................... 2 2. Purpose and Need for Action ............................................................................................................. 7 2.1 Project Background ....................................................................................................................... 7 2.2 Project Purpose and Need ........................................................................................................... 11 2.2.1 Project Need 1 – Large Downtown with Dispersed Activity Centers ................................. 11 2.2.2 Project Need 2 – Lack of High Quality Transit Circulator ................................................. 23 2.2.3 Project Need 3 – Support Planned Development ................................................................ 25 3. Alternatives Analysis ........................................................................................................................ 29 3.1 Alternatives Developed and Considered ..................................................................................... 29 3.1.1 Streetcar Route Alternative 1 .............................................................................................. 32 3.1.2 Streetcar Route Alternative 2 .............................................................................................. 34 3.1.3 Streetcar Route Alternative 3 .............................................................................................. 36 3.1.4 No Action Alternative ......................................................................................................... 38 3.2 Evaluation of Alternatives .......................................................................................................... 38 3.2.1 Technical Analysis .............................................................................................................. 38 3.2.2 Public Feedback .................................................................................................................. 38 3.2.3 Alternative Ranking ............................................................................................................ 38 3.3 Alternative Elimination, Refinement and Selection .................................................................... 40 3.3.1 Route Alternatives Eliminated from Further Study ............................................................ 40 3.3.2 Route Alternatives and Variations Selected for Additional Study ...................................... 41 3.4 Locally Preferred Route Alternative Selection ........................................................................... 45 4. Description of Locally Preferred Alternative ................................................................................. 47 4.1 Streetcar Route ............................................................................................................................ 47 4.2 Streetcar Capital Improvements .................................................................................................. 47 4.2.1 Streetcar Vehicle ................................................................................................................. 51 4.2.2 Streetcar Tracks................................................................................................................... 51 4.2.3 Streetcar Stops..................................................................................................................... 51 4.2.4 Electric Power System ........................................................................................................ 53 4.2.5 Maintenance and Storage Facility ....................................................................................... 53 4.2.6 Roadway Improvements ..................................................................................................... 57 4.3 Streetcar Operating Characteristics ............................................................................................. 57 4.3.1 Service Frequency and Hours of Operation ........................................................................ 57 Milwaukee Streetcar Environmental Assessment v October 2011 4.3.2 Integration with Other Modes ............................................................................................. 57 4.3.3 Ridership ............................................................................................................................. 58 4.4 Capital and Operating Costs ....................................................................................................... 58 5. Environmental Resources, Impacts, and Mitigation ..................................................................... 59 5.1 Social and Economic Factors ...................................................................................................... 59 5.1.1 Land Use and Property Impacts .......................................................................................... 59 5.1.2 Economic Development ...................................................................................................... 63 5.1.3 Environmental Justice ......................................................................................................... 65 5.1.4 Historic and Archaeological Resources .............................................................................. 72 5.1.5 Aesthetics ...........................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • By Supervisor Jursik, 1 2 a RESOLUTION 3 4

    By Supervisor Jursik, 1 2 a RESOLUTION 3 4

    1 By Supervisor Jursik, 2 3 A RESOLUTION 4 5 Requesting Southeastern Wisconsin Regional Planning Committee (SEWRPC) create a 6 study committee to investigate the feasibility and desirability of extending the Lake 7 Parkway to Highway 100 at Ryan Road or other connection to Racine County 8 9 WHEREAS, the Lake Parkway (Highway 794) which opened in 1998, is an 10 important link from the Hoan Bridge (which is Interstate 794) to the southeastern part of 11 Milwaukee County; and 12 13 WHEREAS, this Parkway provides direct access to Cudahy (at Pennsylvania 14 Avenue), St. Francis (at Howard Avenue), Milwaukee (at Oklahoma Avenue and at 15 Carferry Drive) and to all three cities at Layton Avenue; and 16 17 WHEREAS, this Parkway carries over 46,000 vehicles per day to and from the 18 Hoan Bridge with links to other freeways through the Marquette Interchange and exits 19 at the Port of Milwaukee and General Mitchell International Airport; and 20 21 WHEREAS, the residence of Oak Creek, South Milwaukee and Racine County are 22 required to use local residential streets to access the Lake Parkway and these streets are 23 not designed for the current or future traffic; and 24 25 WHEREAS, the Lake Parkway could be extended to the south, adjacent to the 26 existing railroad right of way with little impact on the adjacent uses if it is connected 27 with Highway 100 at Ryan Road or Wisconsin Highway 32 or at any connection in Racine 28 County; and 29 30 WHEREAS, the planning and feasibility of this extension is best evaluated by all 31 the local effected
  • Wisdot State Management Plan for Transit

    Wisdot State Management Plan for Transit

    State Management Plan For the following federal programs: 49 U.S.C. § 5304 – Statewide Planning 49 U.S.C. § 5310 – Enhanced Mobility of Seniors and Individuals with Disabilities 49 U.S.C. § 5311 – Formula Grants for Rural Areas 49 U.S.C. § 5339 – Bus and Bus Facilities Prepared by the Public and Specialized Transit Section Bureau of Transit, Local Roads, Railroads, and Harbors Division of Transportation Investment Management Wisconsin Department of Transportation Date: May 18, 2020 Wisconsin Department of Transportation 1 State Management Plan for Federal Transit Programs Contact information: Ian Ritz, Chief Public and Specialized Transit Section 4822 Madison Yards Way, 6th Floor South Madison, WI 53705 608-266-0189 [email protected] This document is available in alternate formats upon request. Date: May 18, 2020 Wisconsin Department of Transportation 2 State Management Plan for Federal Transit Programs TABLE OF CONTENTS DEFINITIONS and ACRONYMS ........................................................................................................................ 4 FORWARD ........................................................................................................................................................... 6 PLAN CONTENT .................................................................................................................................................. 7 A. PROGRAM GOALS AND OBJECTIVES .................................................................................................... 7 B. ROLES AND
  • Trolleys Through the Timber - Richard Thompson

    Trolleys Through the Timber - Richard Thompson

    Oregon Electric Railway Historical Society Volume 19 503 Issue 2 Spring 2014 Reminder to members: Please be sure your dues In this issue: are up to date. 2014 dues were due Jan 1, 2014. Trolleys Through the Timber - Richard Thompson....................1 Oregon Electric Railway Historical Society News.......................2 If it has been longer than one year since you renewed, Interpretative Center Update Greg Bonn....................................2 go to our website: oerhs.org and download an Red Trolleys in the Sun Mark Kavanagh..................................5 application by clicking: Become a Member MAX Yellow Line Lou Bowerman ..............................................6 Seattle Transit Update Roy Bonn................................................7 Tucson Sun Link Update Roy Bonn............................................9 See this issue in color on line DC Streetcar Update Roy Bonn..............................................10 at oerhs.org/transfer Pacific Northwest Transit Update Roy Bonn..............................10 Spotlight on Members: Hal Rosene ..........................................11 Trolleys Through the Timber Oregon’s Small Town Streetcar Systems By Richard Thompson The following article is excerpted from Richard's upcoming book, “Trolleys Through the Timber: Oregon's Small Town Streetcar Systems.” As the working title indicates, it will focus upon streetcars outside of Portland. This new endeavor will allow the author to further develop information about small town streetcar systems that previously appeared in his online Oregon Encyclopedia entries, and his four books for Arcadia Publishing. By the turn of the 20th century the Small town streetcar systems often relied on secondhand rolling stock. This interurban- street railway had become a vital part of like Forest Grove Transportation Company car is thought to have started life as a trailer urban transportation.
  • 10B-FY2020-Budget-Adoption-FINALIZED.Pdf

    10B-FY2020-Budget-Adoption-FINALIZED.Pdf

    Report by Finance and Capital Committee (B) 03-28-2019 Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Board Action/Information Summary MEAD Number: Resolution: Action Information 202068 Yes No TITLE: Adopt FY2020 Operating Budget and FY2020-2025 CIP PRESENTATION SUMMARY: Staff will review feedback received from the public and equity analysis on the FY2020 Proposed Budget and request approval of the Public Outreach and Input Report, FY2020 Operating Budget and FY2020-2025 Capital Improvement Program (CIP). PURPOSE: The purpose of this item is to seek Board acceptance and approval of the Public Outreach and Input Report and Title VI equity analysis, and the FY2020 Operating Budget and FY2020-2025 CIP. DESCRIPTION: Budget Priorities: Keeping Metro Safe, Reliable and Affordable The budget is built upon the General Manager/CEO's Keeping Metro Safe, Reliable and Affordable (KMSRA) strategic plan. Metro is making major progress to achieve the goals of this plan by ramping up to average capital investment of $1.5 billion annually, establishing a dedicated capital trust fund exclusive to capital investment, and limiting jurisdictional annual capital funding growth to three percent. Metro continues to encourage the U.S. Congress to reauthorize the Passenger Rail Investment and Improvement Act (PRIIA) beyond FY2020, which provides $150 million in annual federal funds matched by $150 million from the District of Columbia, State of Maryland, and Commonwealth of Virginia. In order to establish a sustainable operating model, Metro is limiting jurisdictional operating subsidy growth to three percent and deploying innovative competitive contracting. The items on the KMSRA agenda that remain to be completed include restructuring retirement benefits and creating a Rainy Day Fund.
  • UBS Commercial Mortgage Trust 2019-C17 Form FWP Filed 2019-09

    UBS Commercial Mortgage Trust 2019-C17 Form FWP Filed 2019-09

    SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION FORM FWP Filing under Securities Act Rules 163/433 of free writing prospectuses Filing Date: 2019-09-19 SEC Accession No. 0001539497-19-001540 (HTML Version on secdatabase.com) SUBJECT COMPANY UBS Commercial Mortgage Trust 2019-C17 Mailing Address Business Address 1285 AVENUE OF THE 1285 AVENUE OF THE CIK:1785812| State of Incorp.:DE | Fiscal Year End: 1231 AMERICAS AMERICAS Type: FWP | Act: 34 | File No.: 333-227784-04 | Film No.: 191102145 NEW YORK NY 10019 NEW YORK NY 10019 SIC: 6189 Asset-backed securities 212-713-2000 FILED BY UBS Commercial Mortgage Securitization Corp. Mailing Address Business Address 1285 AVENUE OF THE 1285 AVENUE OF THE CIK:1532799| IRS No.: 453587479 | State of Incorp.:DE | Fiscal Year End: 1231 AMERICAS AMERICAS Type: FWP NEW YORK NY 10019 NEW YORK NY 10019 SIC: 6189 Asset-backed securities 212-713-2000 Copyright © 2019 www.secdatabase.com. All Rights Reserved. Please Consider the Environment Before Printing This Document FREE WRITING PROSPECTUS FILED PURSUANT TO RULE 433 REGISTRATION FILE NO.: 333-227784-04 Copyright © 2019 www.secdatabase.com. All Rights Reserved. Please Consider the Environment Before Printing This Document September 19, 2019 FREE WRITING PROSPECTUS STRUCTURAL AND COLLATERAL TERM SHEET $807,336,117 (Approximate Total Mortgage Pool Balance) $698,345,000 (Approximate Offered Certificates) UBS 2019-C17 UBS Commercial Mortgage Securitization Corp. Depositor UBS AG Wells Fargo Bank, National Association Rialto Mortgage Finance, LLC Ladder Capital Finance LLC Rialto Real Estate Fund III Debt, LP CIBC Inc. Sponsors and Mortgage Loan Sellers UBS Securities LLC Wells Fargo Securities Co-Lead Managers and Joint Bookrunners CIBC World Academy Bancroft Brean Capital Drexel Hamilton Markets Securities Capital, LLC Co-Managers The depositor has filed a registration statement (including a prospectus) with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) (SEC File No.
  • Timberworks Building 325 E Chicago Street Milwaukee, Wi 53202

    Timberworks Building 325 E Chicago Street Milwaukee, Wi 53202

    FOR LEASE TIMBERWORKS BUILDING 325 E CHICAGO STREET MILWAUKEE, WI 53202 Property Highlights Specifications Contact • Located in the heart of the Historic Third Ward AVAILABLE SPACE Suite 400: 6,983 SF Derek Yentz • Excellent highway access to I-94/794 and I-43 (Available 1/1/2021) 414.249.2321 [email protected] • Walking distance from countless retail, Gross Building Area 36,600 SF restaurants and entertainment options Year Built/Renovated 1913/1990 (blocks from Summerfest grounds) Stories 5 • Exposed brick and high-beamed ceilings Construction Masonry • Cafe on ground level Lease Rate $14.50/SF NNN Operating Expenses $8.25/SF (Est. 2020) 414.271.1111 | www.founders3.com Information shown herein was provided by Seller/Lessor and/or third parties and has not been verified by the broker unless otherwise indicated. FOR LEASE TIMBERWORKS BUILDING 325 E CHICAGO STREET MILWAUKEE, WI 53202 PROPERTY PHOTOS 414.271.1111 | www.founders3.com Information shown herein was provided by Seller/Lessor and/or third parties and has not been verified by the broker unless otherwise indicated. 1 2 3 4 5 6 m i l w a u k e e 3 3 3 E a s t C h i c a g o S t r e e t M i l w a u k e e, W i s c o n s i n 53202 D D t e l e p h o n e 414 . 271 . 5350 m a d i s o n 3 0 9 West Johnson Street, Suite 202 M a d i s o n, W i s c o n s i n 5 3 7 0 3 t e l e p h o n e 608 .
  • Creating a Sound Economy Through Advanced Manufacturing with Advanced Materials, Robust Supply Chains, and Exports

    Creating a Sound Economy Through Advanced Manufacturing with Advanced Materials, Robust Supply Chains, and Exports

    MAKING PROSPERITY CREATING A SOUND ECONOMY THROUGH ADVANCED MANUFACTURING WITH ADVANCED MATERIALS, ROBUST SUPPLY CHAINS, AND EXPORTS RESEARCH PREPARED FOR e Advanced Manufacturing Jobs and Innovation Accelerator Challenge Innovations in Advanced Materials and Metals Manufacturing Project and e Greater Portland Export Initiative AUTHOR: DR. BETH FITZ GIBBON | APRIL 2015 THIS REPORT WAS PREPARED UNDER AN AWARD FROM THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ADMINISTRATION | GRANT AWARD NUMBER 07 79 06921 “Tending the Beast”; charcoal and pastel on canvas, 72 x 50", © 2014 Donna Steger The machinists in this department at Enoch Manufacturing in Clackamas, Oregon, work on older-style screw machines, which are fully automatic but not computerized. Once the machines are set up, they continue producing high-volume, quality, turned components with consistent accuracy and minimal human intervention. This piece depicts the intense efforts of the workers as heroic, using care and precision to produce parts that fulfill the needs of both local and global commerce. Original Artwork reproduced with permission of the artist, Donna Steger: The Art Of Work As Works Of Art™ GREATER PORTLAND REGIONAL ADVANCED MANUFACTURING & MATERIALS INDUSTRY PROFILES MAKING PROSPERITY Creating a Sound Economy through Advanced Manufacturing with Advanced Materials, Robust Supply Chains and Exports Research prepared for: The Advanced Manufacturing Jobs and Innovation Accelerator Challenge Grant, Innovations in Advanced Materials and Metals Manufacturing Project, and the Greater Portland Export Initiative Author: Dr. Beth Fitz Gibbon April 2015 This publication was prepared by the Columbia River Economic Development Council. The statements, conclusions, and recommendations are those of the author and do not reflect the views of the Economic Development Administration.
  • Bombardier Test Project Involves Induction Technology Page 1 of 3

    Bombardier Test Project Involves Induction Technology Page 1 of 3

    Bombardier test project involves induction technology Page 1 of 3 Bombardier test project involves induction technology BY FRANÇOIS SHALOM, THE GAZETTE JANUARY 10, 2013 An artist’s conception of Bombardier’s new electric bus which has its battery recharged through a capacitor under bus stops. MONTREAL — There’s no budget, no timeline, no proven technology, much less shovels in the ground or even a signed contract. But it’s substantially more than an idle dream. Montreal’s Île-Ste-Hélène is scheduled to be the North American test site this year for Bombardier Inc.’s Primove pilot project, a technology that is being tested at four sites in Germany, where the firm’s rail division is based. Primove’s mandate is to develop electric mass-transit propulsion systems, but not the vehicles themselves. Intended to bypass the conventional notion of electric buses and trolley buses powered by cumbersome batteries, Primove rests on an inductive transfer of power from ground-based electrical power sources to very small batteries placed under, not in, the bus. Sensors on the vehicles would store the energy emitted by the electro-magnetic field, but only in small quantities, feeding the bus or trolley sufficiently to reach the next power source a short distance away. The system can charge while the vehicle is in motion or at rest. http://www.montrealgazette.com/story_print.html?id=7803624&sponsor= 2/28/2013 Bombardier test project involves induction technology Page 2 of 3 “You bury power stations capable of charging rapidly, even instantly — we’re talking seconds — so that you don’t need to resort to (lengthier) conventional power boost systems currently on the market” like hybrid and electric vehicles, said Bombardier Transportation spokesperson Marc Laforge.
  • Cost-Benefit Analysis of Constructing and Operating a Streetcar System in Buffalo, NY

    Cost-Benefit Analysis of Constructing and Operating a Streetcar System in Buffalo, NY

    State University of New York College at Buffalo - Buffalo State College Digital Commons at Buffalo State Applied Economics Theses Economics and Finance 12-2020 Cost-Benefit Analysis of Constructing and Operating a Streetcar System in Buffalo, NY Daniel Kevin Zielinski State University of New York College at Buffalo - Buffalo State College, [email protected] Advisor Bruce Fisher, Ph.D. First Reader Bruce Fisher, Ph.D. Second Reader Frederick Floss, Ph.D. Third Reader Nicole Hunter, Ph.D. Department Chair Frederick Floss, Ph.D. To learn more about the Economics and Finance Department and its educational programs, research, and resources, go to https://economics.buffalostate.edu/. Recommended Citation Zielinski, Daniel Kevin, "Cost-Benefit Analysis of Constructing and Operating a Streetcar System in Buffalo, NY" (2020). Applied Economics Theses. 43. https://digitalcommons.buffalostate.edu/economics_theses/43 Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.buffalostate.edu/economics_theses Cost-Benefit Analysis of Constructing And Operating a Streetcar System in Buffalo, NY Daniel Zielinski An Abstract of a Thesis in Applied Economics Submitted in Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements For the Degree of Master of Arts DecemberAugust 2020 Buffalo State College State University of New York Department of Economics and Finance i. Abstract In about 30 of the largest 300 US metro areas, fixed-rail electric streetcars have been reintroduced or refurbished after 75 years of policy favoring petroleum-powered buses. Unlike buses, new streetcar systems are designed to enhance or regenerate economic activity along their routes in urban centers that lack the population density to support subway systems. This paper assesses the criteria utilized by the US Department of Transportation in its decision-making process for supporting streetcar projects.
  • US Manufacture of Rail Vehicles for Intercity

    US Manufacture of Rail Vehicles for Intercity

    ! "#$#!%&'()&*+(,-!.)!/&01! 2-30*1-4!).,!5'+-,*0+6! 7&44-'8-,!/&01!&'9! ",:&'!;,&'40+! ! ! !"#$%&'"()$*+"!+$%,-*-" ! ! %&,*6!B.C-?!$&.,0!;.D(.D&?!E,04+-'!F(:&6?! <('-!=>?!=@A@! &'9!G&,6!G-,-))0! ! H.'+,0:(+0'8!HGGH!,-4-&,*3-,I!;&10!;,088! ! ! ! ! ./0/"1$+&2$34&5'"62"7$*%"#')*3%'-"265"8+4'53*4,"9$--'+:'5"7$*%"$+;".5<$+"=5$+-*4" This research was prepared on behalf of Apollo Alliance with support from the Rockefeller Foundation and Surdna Foundation. The authors would like to thank Matt Mayrl of the Apollo Alliance for comments on early drafts. Many thanks also to the following reviewers: Doug Bowen, Chandra Brown, Nora Friend, Ruggero Golini, Dennis Harwig, Hatsuhiko Kageyama, Mike Mekhiche, Richard Moss, Matthew Palilla, Mike Pracht, Maryanne Roberts, Robin Stimson, and Chuck Wochele. Errors of fact or interpretation remain exclusively with the authors. We welcome comments and suggestions. The lead author can be contacted at [email protected]. List of Abbreviations APMs Automated People Movers ARRA American Recovery and Reinvestment Act CNR China North Locomotive and Rolling Stock Industry Group CSR China South Locomotive and Rolling Stock Industry Group DMUs Diesel Multiple Units EMUs Electric Multiple Units EMD Electro Motive Diesel EWI Edison Welding Institute FRA Federal Railroad Administration FTA Federal Transit Administration HSR High Speed Rail IAMAW International Association of Machinists IBEW International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers LRT Light Rail Transit NAICS North American Industry Classification System OEM Original Equipment Manufacturer PRIIA Passenger Rail Investment and Improvement Act of 2008 UNIFE Union des Industries Ferroviaires Européennes U.S. PIRG Federation of State Public Interest Research Groups Photo Permissions: Cover photo by Dave Wilcox (2008), Tostie14, (2005) and Doug Beghtel (2009) © June 22, 2010.
  • Media Clips Template

    Media Clips Template

    The Oregonian Uber refuses to pay $2,000 fine for operating illegally in Eugene: Uber vs. Portland roundup By Joseph Rose December 11, 2014 Lawyers in the case of the City of Portland vs. Uber Inc. have yet to settle on a hearing date in U.S. District Court. But City Hall sources tell The Oregonian the two sides could present their arguments before federal Judge Michael H. Simon on, of all days, Christmas Eve. So any plans to take the UberX ride service to and from holidays parties may need to be scrapped at the last minute. Stay tuned. In the meantime, the city should probably wait before it starts spending cash from those $1,500 fines issued last weekend to Uber for operating an illegal taxi service. If the story unfolding in Eugene is any indication, the San Francisco-based ridesharing startup – no surprise here – disagrees with that city's claim that it needs to secure a license to operate. Uber has filed an appeal, asking for the dismissal of a $2,000 fine in Eugene, the Register-Guard reports. The company's UberX service -- allowing customers to use a smartphone app to conveniently hail and pay contracted drivers using their private cars as de facto cabs -- is now rolling legally and illegally in six Oregon cities and Vancouver. From the Register-Guard: Uber began operating in the Eugene-Springfield area on July 23. Oregon Taxi, the area's largest taxi company, then accused Uber of breaking city regulations by not securing a license. City fined Uber on Nov.
  • I-794, Lake Freeway Bicycle/Pedestrian Feasibility Study

    I-794, Lake Freeway Bicycle/Pedestrian Feasibility Study

    I-794 Lake Freeway Bicycle/Pedestrian Feasibility Study Milwaukee County EXECUTIVE SUMMARY INTRODUCTION In accordance with policy set forth by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), as well as state laws and policies, the Wisconsin Department of Transportation (WisDOT) is evaluating the feasibility of adding a shared-use path to the Daniel Hoan Bridge (Hoan Bridge) as part of the rehabilitation project expected to begin in 2013. This study includes an evaluation of the feasibility of alternatives for a shared-use path along Interstate 794, Lake Freeway (I-794), specifically along the Hoan Bridge. I-794 LAKE FREEWAY (HOAN BRIDGE REHABILITATION) PROJECT SCOPE WisDOT is moving forward on a project to make major improvements to the Hoan Bridge and the I-794 Freeway. This project is divided into three segments: 1. I-794 East-West (Milwaukee River to the Lake Interchange) • Remove and replace bridges with new structures 2. Lake Interchange (I-794 East-West to the Hoan Bridge) • Overlay concrete and repair concrete surface 3. Hoan Bridge (Lake Interchange to Lincoln Avenue) • Remove and replace the existing bridge deck and make structural modifications • Blast, clean, and repaint the bridge steel Though the Hoan Bridge deck replacement project currently does not include the addition of a shared-use path to the bridge, certain FHWA and state guidelines recommend investigating the feasibility of adding a shared-use path to projects involving a bridge redeck. EXISTING CONDITIONS EVALUATION The Hoan Bridge in its existing condition is 108 feet wide and consists of three 12-foot wide travel lanes in both the northbound and southbound directions.