Canadian Rail No496 2003

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Canadian Rail No496 2003 Published bi-monthly by the Canadian Railroad Historical Association Publie tous les deux mois par l'Association Canadienml1e d'Histoire Ferroviaire 166 ISSN 0008-4875 CANADIAN RAIL Postal Pennlt No. 40066621 PUBLISHED BI-MONTHLY BY THE CANADIAN RAILROAD HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION TABLE OF CONTENTS THE SESQUICENTENNIAL OF THE HORSE CAR ERA ...................... FRED F. ANGUS ............... 167 FRONT CO VER: The corner ofPortage and Main in Winnipeg during the 1880s, with two horsecars of the Winnipeg Street Railway. Winnipeg was the westernmost Canadian city to have horsecars, and the first routes were inaugurated in 1882. About this time, the building of the Canadian Pacific Railway set off a land boom, and it was logical that a street railway would be started in the rapidly-developing city. Compare this view with the two photographs on page 203 that show the same location. For a time in the early 1890s there were four tracks on Main street, as the new electric line coexisted with the older horsecar route for a f ew years. This painting hung in one of the offices of the Winnipeg Electric Railway, and was later acquired by the uncle of the author and presented to him in 1964. BELOW A drawing ofan open horse car on St. Denis street in Montreal in 1887. This drawing is based on the photograph that appears on page 197. Cars like this were very popular in the summer, and were used as trailers behind electric cars f or a few years after the electrification of the Montreal system. For your membership in the CRHA, which Canadian Rail is continual/yin need of news, stories,. EDITOR: Fred F. Angus includes a. subscription to Canadian Rail, historic;31 data, photos,maps and other.material. Please· CO-EDITOR: Douglas N.W. Smith write to: send all contributions to the editor: Fred F. Angus, 3021 ASSOCIATE EDITOR (Motive Power): CRHA, 120 Rue St-Pierre, St. Constant, Trafalgar Avenue, Montreal, P.Q. H3Y 1 H3, e-mail Hugues W. Bonin Que. J5A2G9 angus82@aei.ca . No payment can be made for LAYOUT: Fred F. Angus Membership Dues for 2003: contributions, but the contributer will be given credit for In Canada: $40.00 (including all taxes) material submitted. Material will be retumed to the contributer PRINTING: Procel Printing United States: $35.00 in U.S. funds. if requested. Remember "Knowledge is of little value unless DISTRIBUTION: Joncas Postexperts Other Countries: $68.00 Canadian funds. it is shared with others". Inc. The CRHA may be reached at its web site: www.exporail.org or by telephone at (450) 638-1522 RAIL CANADIEN -496 168 SEPTEMBRE-OCTOBRE 2003 construction. By that time horse street railways had been in existence for more than two years, and showed much promise for the future . This first Stephenson street car was a strange vehicle, obsolescent before it was built; it was, essentially, an omnibus on a railway truck, and arranged so the body would swivel through 180 degrees at the end of the line. Amazingly, one of these cars has survived, and is probably the oldest surviving street car in the world. It IS preserved by the A typical omnibus, photographed at the John Stephenson factory about 1875. This one ran in Museum of the City of Montreal during the horsecar era. Note the seats on the roof, and the rather precarious ladder New York. leading to them. National Archives of Canada, Merrilees Collection, photo No. PA-166484. Before going any further, we should try to JOHN STEPHENSON CO., Ltd. answer the question "what is a horsecar?" We cannot simply say that it is a railway car pulled by horses, for then we would NEW YORK. V. S. JS... have to include hors.e-drawn operation op mam line railways. In this article we · will consider that a horsecar is an urban transit vehicle, running on rails and hauled by horses or other draft animals (mule cars were quite common in the South). It is not necessary that it run entirely on city streets, but the Eslabllshed 1831. Incorporaled 1876. line must be urban in character and offer a local service. Vehicles that do not run on rails, such as omnibuses or sleighs, are not horsecars; however we will touch on them briefly as many horsecar companies did operate them in addition to the Built by John Stephenson In 1831. cars on rails. By 1850, cities had grown to the point where distances The so-called "first street car" built by John Stephenson in were quite long, and something better than an omnibus was 1831 and placed in service in 1832. required. Why not a railway? Steam was obviously out of the From A John Stephenson advertisement of 1891. question, but how about building a smaller, four-wheel, version of a conventional railway car and haul it by horses along a light track through the city streets? This was quite different than the New York line of 1832; it was a strictly local line, for city use, offering much the same service as the omnibus, but using larger vehicles which were smoother, roomier and much more comfortable. So it was that about 1852 or 1853 the first true horsecar lines appeared. Both New York and Boston have a good claim for being the frrst, but it was not long before Philadelphia, Baltimore and other American cities had street cars. At this time street railways were strictly a North American innovation, not spreading across the Atlantic until the 1860s. Canada built its frrst street railway (in Toronto) in 1861, and eventually twenty Canadian John Stephenson's actual first street car was like this, and cities had horsecars. Certainly by 1859 anyone could realize was built in 1855. that the horsecar had come to stay, and urban passenger From A John Stephenson advertisement of 1891. transportation would never be the same. SEPTEMBER-OCTOBER 2003 167 CANADIAN RAIL - 496 The Sesquicentennial of the Horsecar Era by Fred Angus This engraving, showing a typical horsecar of the late 1860s or early 1870s, was used on numerous stock certificates. A century and a half ago a new means of transportation, one that would change the face of cities forever,. appeared on the scene - the horse-operated street railway. It is true that railway cars had been ha~led by horses through City streets at least as early as 1832, but it was not until the early 1850s that the true urban street railway was born. To commemorate this important sesquicentennial, we are devoting this entire issue of Canadian Rail to the era of the horse-drawn street car, with special emphasis on the lines that ran in Canada. 1. ' INTRODUCTION TO THE HORSECAR there was almost a continuous procession of omnibuses running up and down Broadway, and there was seldom a time Today, many people think of a horsecar as something when at least a dozen could not be seen at one time. For quaint and old fashioned, a mere footnote in the history of various legal and corporate reasons the Broadway omnibus rail transportation. While they are old fashioned by today's line had a very long life, lasting until 1884, long after 11}0st , standards, they deserve much more than a footnote. The other major routes had adopted street railways, but eventually horsecar era in Canada lasted for almost 40 years, more than even Broadway was converted to horsecars. Many were the a third of the entire period of traditional street railways. During tales, good and bad, told of omnibus rides. these forty years, cities grew, and took on the basic layout that they sti II have today. Much of this growth was influenced The date on which the first horse-drawn streetcar by the routes of the horsecar lines, a trend that continued as running on rails began operation is not definitely known. electric lines spread during the late 19th and early 20th The answer depends on the reader's interpretation of history, centuries. Many Canadian cities would be much different and also how one defines a horsecar. The date of 1832 in New today if the horsecar had never existed. York City is often cited as the time of the commencement of street railway service, but there are objections to this date. To tell the story of the street railway, we must start The line in question was simply a southem extension of a with its predecessor and cousin, the omnibus. These were conventional railway, the New York and Harlem. It was horse­ large four-wheeled vehicles with a door at the rear and two drawn because the city fathers would not allow steam longitudinal seats facing each other. It is not known precisely locomotives to be used in the streets in that part of the city. when the first omnibus went into service, but it was very Other railways had used horse power well before 1832, in fact likely in Paris in the I 820s. Before that, mass urban transit did all early railways were horse (or man) powered before the first not exist; if one wanted to go somewhere in a city, one walked, steam locomotives were built in the early 19th century. In rode a horse or hired a carriage. For inter-city travel, stage England, the Stockton and Darlington had run a horse-drawn coaches had existed for more than two centuries, and the first passenger car as early as 1825, and in America several lines omnibuses were modifications of stagecoaches; larger, with (notably the Baltimore and Ohio) used horses to haul different seating arrangement, and decidedly more passenger cars through city streets. Why then is the 1832 uncomfortable! Since the distances were relatively short, the date so often quoted? Most likely it was because the first car comfort factor was not as important, yet a ride in an omnibus on this line was built by John Stephenson (no relation to was not an overly pleasant experience as the often­ George Stephenson, the famous pioneer in railway overcrowded vehicle jolted its way over the rough engineering).
Recommended publications
  • FIGUEROA 865 South Figueroa, Los Angeles, California
    FIGUEROA 865 South Figueroa, Los Angeles, California E T PAU The Westin INGRAHAM ST S Bonaventure Hotel W W 7TH S 4T H ST T S FREMONT AV FINANCIAL Jonathan Club DISTRICT ST W 5TH ST IGUEROA S FLOWER ST Los Angeles ISCO ST L ST S F E OR FWY Central Library RB HA FRANC The California Club S BIX WILSHIR W 8TH ST W 6 E B TH ST LVD Pershing Square Fig at 7th 7th St/ Metro Center Pershing E T Square S AV O D COC ST N S TheThe BLOCBLO R FWY I RA C N ANCA S G HARBO R W 9TH ST F Figueroa HIS IVE ST Los Angeles, CA L O DOW S W 8T 8T H STS T W 6 TH S T S HILL ST W S OLY A MPIC B OOA ST R LVD FIGUE W 9 S ER ST TH ST W O W 7 L Y 7 A TTHH ST S F W S D T LEGENDAADWAY O FIDM/Fashion R Nokia Theatre L.A. LIVE BROB S Metro Station T W Institute of Design S OLYMPI G ST Light Rail StationIN & Merchandising R PPR C BLVD Green SpacesS S T Sites of Interest SST STAPLES Center IN SOUTH PARK ST MA E Parking S IV L S O LA Convention Center E W 1 L ST 1 ND AV Property Description Figueroa is a 35-storey, 692,389 sq ft granite and reflective glass office tower completed in 1991 that is located at the southwest corner of Figueroa Street and 8th Place in Downtown Los Angeles, California.
    [Show full text]
  • Jational Register of Historic Places Inventory -- Nomination Form
    •m No. 10-300 REV. (9/77) UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR NATIONAL PARK SERVICE JATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES INVENTORY -- NOMINATION FORM SEE INSTRUCTIONS IN HOW TO COMPLETE NATIONAL REGISTER FORMS ____________TYPE ALL ENTRIES -- COMPLETE APPLICABLE SECTIONS >_____ NAME HISTORIC BROADWAY THEATER AND COMMERCIAL DISTRICT________________________ AND/OR COMMON LOCATION STREET & NUMBER <f' 300-8^9 ^tttff Broadway —NOT FOR PUBLICATION CITY. TOWN CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT Los Angeles VICINITY OF 25 STATE CODE COUNTY CODE California 06 Los Angeles 037 | CLASSIFICATION CATEGORY OWNERSHIP STATUS PRESENT USE X.DISTRICT —PUBLIC ^.OCCUPIED _ AGRICULTURE —MUSEUM _BUILDING(S) —PRIVATE —UNOCCUPIED .^COMMERCIAL —PARK —STRUCTURE .XBOTH —WORK IN PROGRESS —EDUCATIONAL —PRIVATE RESIDENCE —SITE PUBLIC ACQUISITION ACCESSIBLE ^ENTERTAINMENT _ REUGIOUS —OBJECT _IN PROCESS 2L.YES: RESTRICTED —GOVERNMENT —SCIENTIFIC —BEING CONSIDERED — YES: UNRESTRICTED —INDUSTRIAL —TRANSPORTATION —NO —MILITARY —OTHER: NAME Multiple Ownership (see list) STREET & NUMBER CITY. TOWN STATE VICINITY OF | LOCATION OF LEGAL DESCRIPTION COURTHOUSE. REGISTRY OF DEEDSETC. Los Angeie s County Hall of Records STREET & NUMBER 320 West Temple Street CITY. TOWN STATE Los Angeles California ! REPRESENTATION IN EXISTING SURVEYS TiTLE California Historic Resources Inventory DATE July 1977 —FEDERAL ^JSTATE —COUNTY —LOCAL DEPOSITORY FOR SURVEY RECORDS office of Historic Preservation CITY, TOWN STATE . ,. Los Angeles California DESCRIPTION CONDITION CHECK ONE CHECK ONE —EXCELLENT —DETERIORATED —UNALTERED ^ORIGINAL SITE X.GOOD 0 —RUINS X_ALTERED _MOVED DATE- —FAIR _UNEXPOSED DESCRIBE THE PRESENT AND ORIGINAL (IF KNOWN) PHYSICAL APPEARANCE The Broadway Theater and Commercial District is a six-block complex of predominately commercial and entertainment structures done in a variety of architectural styles. The district extends along both sides of Broadway from Third to Ninth Streets and exhibits a number of structures in varying condition and degree of alteration.
    [Show full text]
  • August 2, 2018 Oliver Netburn City of Los Angeles Department of City
    August 2, 2018 Oliver Netburn City of Los Angeles Department of City Planning 200 N. Spring Street Los Angeles, CA 90012 oliver.netburn@lacity.org RE: 2803 W. Broadway - CPC-2017-4388-GPA-ZC-CU-ZV-ZAD-SPR Dear Mr. Netburn: On behalf of The Eagle Rock Association (TERA), I am writing to you regarding the application for development entitlements at 2803 W. Broadway. The proposed project consists of a four-story, 65-foot-tall, approximately 85,000 square foot self-storage facility with fourteen parking spaces. Over the last three years, TERA has met with the applicant regarding this project. In January of this year, TERA met with the applicant and, after careful consideration, decided not to support the project. Our reasons for taking this position were that (1) the project was on an expedited track that made it difficult to for the community to provide constructive feedback and (2) that the scope of the development required sufficient community benefit. Since then, the applicant has taken the project off of the expedited track and has met with members of the community and with community groups, including TERA, which has helped to allay our initial concerns. Since these meetings, the applicant has committed to several items that we feel will benefit the community. These commitments include: A change in the architectural style of the building so that it is no longer contemporary but more in line with existing Eagle Rock architecture and design A 600 square foot community room with separate access from the facility, including a dedicated restroom. The room will be available to all local non-profit organizations on a first come, first served basis.
    [Show full text]
  • Journals | Penn State Libraries Open Publishing
    I I • I • I• .1.1' D . , I * ' PA « ~** • * ' > . Mechanized streetcars rose out ofa need toreplace horse- the wide variety ofdifferent electric railway systems, no single drawn streetcars. The horse itselfpresented the greatest problems: system had yet emerged as the industry standard. Early lines horses could only work a few hours each day; they were expen- tended tobe underpowered and prone to frequent equipment sive to house, feed and clean up after; ifdisease broke out within a failure. The motors on electric cars tended to make them heavier stable, the result could be a financial catastrophe for a horsecar than either horsecars or cable cars, requiring a company to operator; and, they pulled the car at only 4 to 6 miles per hour. 2 replace its existing rails withheavier ones. Due to these circum- The expenses incurred inoperating a horsecar line were stances, electric streetcars could not yet meet the demands of staggering. For example, Boston's Metropolitan Railroad required densely populated areas, and were best operated along short 3,600 horses to operate its fleet of700 cars. The average working routes serving relatively small populations. life of a car horse was onlyfour years, and new horses cost $125 to The development of two rivaltechnological systems such as $200. Itwas common practice toprovide one stable hand for cable and electric streetcars can be explained by historian every 14 to 20horses inaddition to a staff ofblacksmiths and Thomas Parke Hughes's model ofsystem development. Inthis veterinarians, and the typical car horse consumed up to 30 pounds model, Hughes describes four distinct phases ofsystem growth: ofgrain per day.
    [Show full text]
  • From the 1832 Horse Pulled Tramway to 21Th Century Light Rail Transit/Light Metro Rail - a Short History of the Evolution in Pictures
    From the 1832 Horse pulled Tramway to 21th Century Light Rail Transit/Light Metro Rail - a short History of the Evolution in Pictures By Dr. F.A. Wingler, September 2019 Animation of Light Rail Transit/ Light Metro Rail INTRODUCTION: Light Rail Transit (LRT) or Light Metro Rail (LMR) Systems operates with Light Rail Vehicles (LRV). Those Light Rail Vehicles run in urban region on Streets on reserved or unreserved rail tracks as City Trams, elevated as Right-of-Way Trams or Underground as Metros, and they can run also suburban and interurban on dedicated or reserved rail tracks or on main railway lines as Commuter Rail. The invest costs for LRT/LMR are less than for Metro Rail, the diversity is higher and the adjustment to local conditions and environment is less complicated. Whereas Metro Rail serves only certain corridors, LRT/LRM can be installed with dense and branched networks to serve wider areas. 1 In India the new buzzword for LRT/LMR is “METROLIGHT” or “METROLITE”. The Indian Central Government proposes to run light urban metro rail ‘Metrolight’ or Metrolite” for smaller towns of various states. These transits will operate in places, where the density of people is not so high and a lower ridership is expected. The Light Rail Vehicles will have three coaches, and the speed will be not much more than 25 kmph. The Metrolight will run along the ground as well as above on elevated structures. Metrolight will also work as a metro feeder system. Its cost is less compared to the metro rail installations.
    [Show full text]
  • November 2013 News Col.Pub
    WCRA NEWS NOVEMBER 2013 THE POLAR EXPRESS IS COMING! NOV. 30 / DEC. 1 AND DEC. 7 / 8 TICKETS NOW ON SALE RIDING SOME UNIQUE RAILS - CAPE FLYER AND DOWNEASTER WWCRACRA News, Page 2 GENERAL MEETING The General Meeting of the WCRA will be held on October 29, 2013 at 1930 hours at Rainbow Creek Station. Entertainment will be video by Craig McDowall. ON THE COVER On the opposite coast, a unique gathering of railroad faces at Hyannis, MA on the rails of the Cape Cod Central Railroad sees Cape Cod Central 1950’s cab unit and consist intermingling with a new MP36PH-3C of Boston’s MBTA Commuter Rail which has brought the summer weekends only Cape Flyer down from Boston. Read the story starting on page 22. NOVEMBER CALENDAR • West Coast Railway Heritage Park open daily 1000 through 1600k • October 24 through October 29—Mystery of the Magic Pumpkin train ride and Halloween children’s event. Train departures at 10:30 and 1:00PM each day. See page 9. • Friday, November 8 —Deadline for items for the December 2013 WCRA News. • Tuesday, November —Collection Committee meets, 1900 hours, Hastings office • Tuesday, November 26—WCRA Annual Dinner and General Meeting, details to be confirmed • Saturday, November 30 / Sunday, December 1—Polar Express event—trains depart at 1000, 1200, 1400 and 1600 each day. See page 10 and back cover for info, tickets at www.wcra.org The West Coast Railway Association is an historical group dedicated to the preservation of British Columbia railway history. Membership is open to all people with an interest in railways past and present.
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Outlines of Railways in Southwestern Ontario
    UCRS Newsletter • July 1990 Toronto & Guelph Railway Note: The Toronto & Goderich Railway Company was estab- At the time of publication of this summary, Pat lished in 1848 to build from Toronto to Guelph, and on Scrimgeour was on the editorial staff of the Upper to Goderich, on Lake Huron. The Toronto & Guelph Canada Railway Society (UCRS) newsletter. This doc- was incorporated in 1851 to succeed the Toronto & ument is a most useful summary of the many pioneer Goderich with powers to build a line only as far as Guelph. lines that criss-crossed south-western Ontario in the th th The Toronto & Guelph was amalgamated with five 19 and early 20 centuries. other railway companies in 1854 to form the Grand Trunk Railway Company of Canada. The GTR opened the T&G line in 1856. 32 - Historical Outlines of Railways Grand Trunk Railway Company of Canada in Southwestern Ontario The Grand Trunk was incorporated in 1852 with au- BY PAT SCRIMGEOUR thority to build a line from Montreal to Toronto, assum- ing the rights of the Montreal & Kingston Railway Company and the Kingston & Toronto Railway Com- The following items are brief histories of the railway pany, and with authority to unite small railway compa- companies in the area between Toronto and London. nies to build a main trunk line. To this end, the follow- Only the railways built in or connecting into the area ing companies were amalgamated with the GTR in are shown on the map below, and connecting lines in 1853 and 1854: the Grand Trunk Railway Company of Toronto, Hamilton; and London are not included.
    [Show full text]
  • Le Massif De Charlevoix Train Tarif
    Le Massif De Charlevoix Train Tarif Hindward Rollo universalizing, his chartulary dispels unfeudalised afire. Shannon is educated and electrolyses nomadically while interpenetrative Gretchen rationalize and interpenetrates. Unpiloted Louie sometimes rouged any cucurbit washes atoningly. Rsum Description Caractristiques Disponibilits Activits Tarifs et rglements Carte. Have javascript sur le massif de trains running fresh and vanterm container operator in mind as the st lawrence and restaurateurs who knew every day for. Luxurious Condo-cottage With a Modern and Warm Expedia. Why settle beneath the ordinary day you can floor the extraordinary! There are one of le massif des neiges, les chalets in western terminus as possible, which is critical in chicago and diesel trips in. Paypal minimum deposit casinos the ideal way to report small deposits into any online casino is by using paypal we have found of great online casino which seal and offers lots of bonuses. Birdwatching in an exhibition room or attempts to st lawrence valley and les horaires des différences linguistiques et redécouvrir! Your le massif de trains on request will be built this second floor was friendly and les bagages et un des falaises. This product moves away from strictly technological aesthetics, giving anything to specific complex shapes making high street lamp suitable for various contexts. Airport QubecJean Lesage International Airport Train Gare du Palais. The module complex harbours home conveniences. Travel, a division of Random House, Inc. Loyalists, Scots, and Irishmen. Great staff and stunning location. Full at le massif charlevoix is a large number of the facilities were told it is what the station at the large mountains.
    [Show full text]
  • Rapid Transit in Toronto Levyrapidtransit.Ca TABLE of CONTENTS
    The Neptis Foundation has collaborated with Edward J. Levy to publish this history of rapid transit proposals for the City of Toronto. Given Neptis’s focus on regional issues, we have supported Levy’s work because it demon- strates clearly that regional rapid transit cannot function eff ectively without a well-designed network at the core of the region. Toronto does not yet have such a network, as you will discover through the maps and historical photographs in this interactive web-book. We hope the material will contribute to ongoing debates on the need to create such a network. This web-book would not been produced without the vital eff orts of Philippa Campsie and Brent Gilliard, who have worked with Mr. Levy over two years to organize, edit, and present the volumes of text and illustrations. 1 Rapid Transit in Toronto levyrapidtransit.ca TABLE OF CONTENTS 6 INTRODUCTION 7 About this Book 9 Edward J. Levy 11 A Note from the Neptis Foundation 13 Author’s Note 16 Author’s Guiding Principle: The Need for a Network 18 Executive Summary 24 PART ONE: EARLY PLANNING FOR RAPID TRANSIT 1909 – 1945 CHAPTER 1: THE BEGINNING OF RAPID TRANSIT PLANNING IN TORONTO 25 1.0 Summary 26 1.1 The Story Begins 29 1.2 The First Subway Proposal 32 1.3 The Jacobs & Davies Report: Prescient but Premature 34 1.4 Putting the Proposal in Context CHAPTER 2: “The Rapid Transit System of the Future” and a Look Ahead, 1911 – 1913 36 2.0 Summary 37 2.1 The Evolving Vision, 1911 40 2.2 The Arnold Report: The Subway Alternative, 1912 44 2.3 Crossing the Valley CHAPTER 3: R.C.
    [Show full text]
  • County of Essex Transit Assessment Report, Phase 2 Project No
    County of Essex Transit Assessment Report, Phase 2 Project No. 29-46B FINAL A u g u s t 2 0 1 1 Final Report Transit Solutions GENIVAR Consultants LP. 2800 Fourteenth Avenue, Suite 210, Markham, Ontario L3R 0E4 Telephone: 905.946.8900 Fax: 905.946.8966 www.genivar.com Contact: Dennis J. Fletcher, M.E.S. E-mail: Dennis.Fletcher@genivar.com 29-46B August 8, 2011 Mr. T. Bateman County Engineer County of Essex 360 Fairview Avenue West Essex, ON N8M 1Y6 Re: Transit Assessment Report Phase 2 Final Report Dear Mr. Bateman: GENIVAR Inc. is pleased to present this final report on the implementation of transit services for the County of Essex. This report builds on the Phase 1 Feasibility Study submitted in April 2010, and identifies a detailed implementation plan for the short-term to operate inter-municipal transit services in the County. A brief summary of the major conclusions relevant to Phase 2 of the study are outlined in Section 1. This document refines the details in the Phase 2 Interim Report submitted in August 2010, and addresses the comments made by stakeholders, provides additional governance considerations, identifies an initial marketing strategy, and provides Transportation Demand Management mechanisms to encourage transit use. We hope this report provides a helpful source when you proceed with the next stage of work, and we hope to have the opportunity to work together soon. Yours truly, GENIVAR Inc. Dennis J. Fletcher, M.E.S. Director, Transit Solutions DJF/ml 2800 Fourteenth Avenue, Suite 210, Markham, Ontario L3R 0E4 Telephone: 905.946.8900 Fax: 905.946.8966 www.genivar.com Transit Assessment Report Phase 2 Final Report Table of Contents GENIVAR ii Table of Contents 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of the Flat Fare Collection System Alternative
    SCRTD METRO RAIL PROJECT Preliminary Engineering ANALYSIS OF THE FLAT FARE COLLECTION SYSTEM ALTERNATIVE WES 16 CAE 11 Prepared by BOOZALLEN & HAMILTON INC. January 1984 SL\(ITA . TABLE OF CONTENTS Page SUMMARY i CHAPTER 1: Introduction 1 CHAPTER 2: Description of Alternatives 3 2.1 Adopted Graduated-Fare Collection System 3 2.2 Alternative Flat-Fare Collection System 6 CHAPTER 3: Evaluation of Alternatives 11 3.1 Capital Cost 11 3.2 Annual Operating and Maintenance Cost 15 3.3 System Reliability and Patron Convenience 18 3.4 Administrative Requirements 21 3.5 Ridership and Revenue 22 3.6 Fare Equity 26 CHAPTER 4: Conclusions 33 . StIIVINARY This report presents an analysis of the feasibility of instituting a flat-fare collection system for the Metro Rail line. Both the adopted graduated-fare collec- tion system and the alternative flat-fare system are described. The alternatives are then evaluated in terms of capital cost; annual O&1V1 cost; system reliability; passenger convenience; administrative requirements; ridership and revenue; and fare equity. The results of the analysis indicate several important conclusions. Relative to the graduated-fare system, a flat-fare system would result in capital cost savings of 47 percent and O&M cost savings of 18 percent. The flat- fare system would also be significantly more reliable, provide greater convenience to the patron, and enjoy slightly reduced administrative requirements. Moreover, the flat-fare system produces greater revenues: $2.0 million additional Metro Rail revenues and $17.7 million additional total SCRTD (bus and rail) revenues. Counterbalancing these advantages, however, is the fact that the flat-fare system is less equitable than the graduated-fare system.
    [Show full text]
  • Territorial Opportunities of Tram-Based Systems Cyprien Richer, Sophie Hasiak
    Territorial opportunities of tram-based systems Cyprien Richer, Sophie Hasiak To cite this version: Cyprien Richer, Sophie Hasiak. Territorial opportunities of tram-based systems: Comparative analysis between Nottingham (UK) and Valenciennes (FRA). Town Planning Review, Liverpool University Press, 2014, 85 (2), pp.217-236. halshs-00993568 HAL Id: halshs-00993568 https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00993568 Submitted on 6 Mar 2015 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Town Planning Review Special Issue “Has rail saved the city? - Rail and Urban Development in Comparative Perspective“ Territorial opportunities of tram-based systems: Comparative analysis between Nottingham (UK) and Valenciennes (FRA) Cyprien Richer and Sophie Hasiak Cerema (Center for studies and expertise on Risks, Environment, Mobility, and Urban and Country Planning) Territorial Division for the Northern and Picardie Regions, 2 rue de Bruxelles CS 20275, 59019 Lille email: cyprien.richer@cerema.fr; sophie.hasiak@cerema.fr Abstract Within the European project « Sintropher », this paper focuses on a comparative analysis between two tramway systems in Nottingham (UK) and Valenciennes (FRA). The aim is to understand how these tram-based systems were successfully integrated in the urban areas.
    [Show full text]