DOCSLIB.ORG

Eu Commission Directorate General for Energy And

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Eu Commission Directorate General for Energy And 1/184 EU COMMISSION DIRECTORATE GENERAL FOR ENERGY AND TRANSPORT Study TEN-Energy Tunnel for the analysis of synergy between transport and energy sectors by high voltage transmission in rail-road tunnels in EU25 (including Bulgaria, Romania, Croatia) Final Report MVV Energie AG MVV-TA/4NT/0076114/000/01 Ed. 060531 2/184 Table of contents Page 0. Preamble...................................................................................................................... 5 1. Analysis of electricity cross-border countries congestions .......................................... 6 1.1. General methodology .................................................................................................................7 1.2. Electricity cross-border congestions ...........................................................................................7 1.2.1. Introduction .................................................................................................................7 1.2.2. Cross-border capacity auctions in central Europe .......................................................8 1.2.3. Detailed analysis of cross-border congestions ..........................................................10 1.2.4. Conclusion ................................................................................................................16 1.3. List of priority rail/road projects for synergy ..............................................................................18 1.3.1. Comments on the priority rail/road tunnels for synergy on electrical and civil works points of view ..................................................................................................23 1.4. Tunnel selection for a more detailed analysis ...........................................................................38 1.5. Multi-criteria analysis - Decision matrix.....................................................................................39 2. Feasibility study of installation of HV links in the tunnel ............................................ 42 2.1. Brenner tunnel ..........................................................................................................................42 2.1.1. General information on the tunnel .............................................................................43 2.1.2. Possible location in the tunnel- Type of link...............................................................47 2.1.3. Thermal behavior ......................................................................................................53 2.1.4. Power flow and short-circuit studies ..........................................................................53 2.1.5. Electromagnetic impact .............................................................................................53 2.1.6. GIL Gas Monitoring System ......................................................................................56 2.1.7. Highest compatibility of GIL with tunnel.....................................................................57 2.2. Lyon - Turin tunnel....................................................................................................................58 2.2.1. General information regarding this tunnel..................................................................59 2.2.2. Possible location in the tunnel - Type of link..............................................................70 2.2.3. Heat rise....................................................................................................................85 2.2.4. Electromagnetic impact .............................................................................................85 2.2.5. Electromagnetic effects .............................................................................................88 2.2.6. Connection to the grid - Tunnel exit on the Italian side ..............................................91 2.2.7. Connection to the grid - Tunnel exit on the French side ............................................95 2.3. Eurotunnel ................................................................................................................................97 2.3.1. General information on the tunnel .............................................................................98 MVV-TA/4NT/0076114/000/01 Ed. 060531 3/184 2.3.2. Particularity of a HV link between France and England ...........................................102 2.3.3. Possible location in the tunnel - Type of link............................................................106 2.4. Monte Ceneri tunnel ...............................................................................................................108 2.4.1. General information on the Monte Ceneri/Gotthard tunnels.....................................109 2.4.2. Zimmerberg - Gotthard - Ceneri base tunnels in the HV network ............................117 2.4.3. Situation of the work................................................................................................118 2.4.4. Type of tunnel and tunnel cross-section ..................................................................120 2.4.5. Type of link..............................................................................................................124 2.4.6. Conclusions.............................................................................................................127 2.5. Somport tunnel - Additional tunnel..........................................................................................128 2.5.1. Situation map ..........................................................................................................129 2.5.2. Present situation of the railway tunnel .....................................................................132 2.5.3. Cross-section of the railway tunnel..........................................................................134 2.5.4. Possible location in the tunnel - Type of link............................................................135 2.5.5. Magnetic field ..........................................................................................................138 3. Cables technology ................................................................................................... 139 3.1. Cable technology - AC (U = 400 kV).......................................................................................141 3.1.1. Cable technology.....................................................................................................141 3.1.2. Additional information - Insulation thickness............................................................149 3.1.3. Voltage....................................................................................................................149 3.1.4. Dimensions - size of the sections (for information) ..................................................149 3.1.5. Current development work and technological changes ...........................................150 3.2. Technology currently used in high-voltage cables for direct current - extruded synthetic insulation cable.......................................................................................................................151 3.2.1. State of the technology............................................................................................151 3.2.2. Main criteria for establishing the dimensions of DC cables......................................153 3.3. "GIL" (Gas Insulated Line) - technology..................................................................................156 3.3.1. Introduction .............................................................................................................156 3.3.2. Basic performance and main technical features ......................................................156 3.3.3. Manufacturing and factory routine testing................................................................161 3.3.4. Erection and testing on site .....................................................................................161 3.3.5. Earthing system.......................................................................................................162 3.3.6. Partitioning, monitoring, maintenance and repair ....................................................163 3.3.7. Leakage rate ...........................................................................................................164 3.4. Environmental impact in the event of AC/DC faults ................................................................165 3.4.1. Power cut times in the event of a fault.....................................................................165 3.4.2. Energy released at the area of the fault...................................................................165 3.5. Protection ...............................................................................................................................168 3.5.1. For AC - XLPE insulation.........................................................................................168 MVV-TA/4NT/0076114/000/01 Ed. 060531 4/184 3.5.2. For AC - GIL technology..........................................................................................168 3.5.3. For DC links ............................................................................................................168 3.6. Reliability of each type of links................................................................................................173 3.6.1. Reliability of the
Load more

Recommended publications
  • La Via Del Ceneri
    FR Le projet a bénéficié du soutien important de la Confédération et du Le Terre del Ceneri Canton du Tessin. Les Chemins de fer fédéraux suisses, SBB CFF FFS, ont contribué à la réalisation par le biais de Ceneri 2020. De nombreuses DES LIEUX À VIVRE ENTRE HISTOIRE, fondations et associations ont rejoint La Via del Ceneri, qui bénéficie du soutien de Ticino Turismo et des Organisations Touristiques Régionales NATURE ET TRADITION Bellinzonese et Haut Tessin, d’Ascona-Locarno et de la région de Lugano. Des rives du Lac Majeur et de la rivière Tessin aux pentes du Monte Tamaro, Le Terre del Ceneri relient Sopraceneri et Sotto- ceneri. Le Monte Ceneri, mentionné dès le Moyen Âge, a en effet Partner di destinazione été pendant des siècles le col capable d’unir les différentes ré- «Ceneri 2020» gions du Tessin. Ses bois ont été traversés par ceux qui descen- daient des Alpes vers la plaine du Pô et par ceux qui montaient vers le nord de l’Europe. Aujourd’hui, les voies de communication modernes passent sous terre et les moyens de transport sont plus rapides. C’est pour- quoi Le Terre del Ceneri, qui comprennent les communes de Architecture, paysages et coordination: Cadenazzo, Gambarogno et Monteceneri, se présentent comme Christian Rivola avec l’atelier ribo+ un cœur vert au centre du Tessin, riche en histoire, en culture et Contenu, graphisme et mise en page: en passion pour le territoire. visiva.ch Copyright foto: Sertus Image sagl et les Organisations Touristiques Régionales Impression: Fontana Print SA Ascona-Locarno Tourism Tel +41 848
    [Show full text]
  • Costs and Demand of High Speed Rail in Italy and Spain
    World Conference on Transport Research - WCTR 2016 Shanghai. 10-15 July 2016 Delusions of success: costs and demand of high speed rail in Italy and Spain Paolo Beria1a, Daniel Albalateb, Raffaele Grimaldia, Germà Belb a Department of Architecture and Urban Studies (DAStU), Politecnico di Milano, Italy b Dep. Política Econòmica, Universitat de Barcelona, Spain Abstract Mismatches between forecasted and actual costs and traffic figures are common in transport investments, especially in large scale ones, and so are delusions on future demand. High-speed rail project are often among the worst practices for cost overruns and demand overestimation, even where traffic figures may tell a history of apparent success. In the paper, we analyse two significant cases of delusion of success, namely Italian and Spanish HSR programmes. The Italian one shows excellent demand performances, but is among the continental worst cases for construction costs. The Spanish one, recognised worldwide as one of the most successful cases, is the one where potential demand estimations was systematically neglected and the planned network appears largely out-of-scale compared to actual traffic. The two cases show that the core of the problem does not lay in the wrong estimations of costs and demand, but on deliberate choices of overinvestment, overdesign and overquality. © 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. Peer-review under responsibility of WORLD CONFERENCE ON TRANSPORT RESEARCH SOCIETY. Keywords: High-speed rail, megaprojects, Italy, Spain, cost overrun, demand estimation, optimism bias 1 Corresponding author. Tel.: +39-02-2399-5424; fax: +39-02-2399-5435. E-mail address: [email protected] © 2017 The Authors 2 Beria, Albalate, Grimaldi, Bel / Transportation Research Procedia 00 (2017) 000–000 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Gotthard Bergstrecke’
    University of Lugano, Switzerland Faculty of Economics The touristic future on and along the ‘Gotthard Bergstrecke’ Exploring the associations people have with the region, the motivations of prospective visitors, their requirements to a ‘Gottardo Express’ train offer and the potential of regional attractions. Master’s dissertation Author: Fabio Flepp Supervisor: Prof. Rico Maggi Second Reader: Stefano Scagnolari Academic year: 2014/2015 Submission date: December 2014 ! Contact Author: Fabio Flepp - Linkedin: https://ch.linkedin.com/in/fabio-flepp-a2567043 - Email: [email protected] Table of Contents LIST OF FIGURES IV LIST OF TABLES V LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS VI 1. INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 CHOICE OF TOPIC 1 1.1.1 ALPTRANSIT AND “BERGSTRECKE” 2 1.1.2 CONSEQUENCES, FEARS AND SIMILAR PLACES 3 1.1.3 DISCUSSIONS ABOUT THE FUTURE TOURISM DEVELOPMENT 4 1.2 RESEARCH AIM 5 1.3 OUTLINE 7 2. TRANSPORT AND TOURISM 8 2.1 GENERAL 8 2.2 TRANSPORTATION FOR TOURISM 9 2.3 (TOURISM-) IMPACTS OF NEW TRAFFIC INFRASTRUCTURE 9 2.4 TRANSPORT AS TOURISM & SLOW TRAVEL 10 2.5 RAIL TOURISM 12 2.5.1 MOTIVATION FOR TRAIN TRAVEL 12 2.5.2 HERITAGE RAILWAYS 13 3. GOTTHARD 14 3.1 HISTORY OF THE TRANSPORTATION LANDSCAPE 14 3.2 TOURISM HISTORY IN THE GOTTHARD REGION 15 3.3 TOURISM TODAY 17 3.3.1 TOURISM NUMBERS OF THE GOTTHARD REGION 18 3.3.2 TOURISM MONITOR 2013 18 3.3.3 PRESENT TOURISM PRODUCTS AND TOURISM CARD OFFERS 19 4. TOURISM PRODUCTS (+ DESTINATIONS) 23 4.1 GENERAL 23 4.2 CO-CREATION OF THE TOURISM EXPERIENCE 24 4.3 TOURISM PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT 25 I 5.
    [Show full text]
  • RURBANCE Project Territorial System Factsheet
    RURBANCE Project Territorial System Factsheet Territorial System Identification data Name: Zurich Main urban center: Zurich Country: Switzerland State / Region: Canton of Zurich Map 1: A Zurich – Metropolitan Area Zurich (Zurich and greater surroundings) RURBANCE Project Territorial System Factsheet Pilot Area for Rurbance-Project Line Zurich (A) - Gottardo – Milano (B) (planned «Gottardo»-study) Rural and urban regions on the «Gottardo»-route: City of Zurich, Cantons of Zurich, Zug (City of Zug), Schwyz (only inner part of the Canton, City of Schwyz), Uri (capital Altdorf), Ticino (Cities of Bellinzona, Lugano, Mendrisio/Chiasso) and City of Milano RURBANCE Project Territorial System Factsheet Territorial System Reference data City of Zurich (end 2011) Population City of Zurich 390’000 Area (km2): 92 Density: 4’240 p / km2 Cantons of Zurich, Uri, Schwyz, Zug and Ticino (pilot study-area «Gottardo»; end 2011) Population Area Density Number of km2 p / km2 Municipalities Canton Schwyz SZ 148’000 908 151 30 Canton Ticino TI 337’000 2’812 119 147 Canton Uri UR 35’000 1’077 32 20 Canton Zug ZG 115’000 239 481 11 Canton Zurich ZH 1’392’000 1’729 805 171 Pilot study-area «Gottardo» Population pilot area 2’027’000 6’764 296 379 % of Switzerland 25.5% 16.38 % Switzerland 7’953’000 41’285 193 *2‘408 * 1.1.2013 Spoken languages ZH, UR, SZ, ZG German TI Italian RURBANCE Project Territorial System Factsheet Land use (% in the TS, as for the CORINE Land Cover level 2 data 2006, in km2) SZ TI UR ZG ZH pilot area CH Urban fabric (1.1) 41.55 137.70 11.89
    [Show full text]
  • L'autostrada Del Monte Ceneri
    dere lungo la valle del Vedeggio, inaugu­ alternarsi continuo di ponti - notevoli passo della ferrovia ai Sasselli, sopra Ca­ rato il 10 aprile 1882. La prima galleria, quelli sopra i torrenti di Robasacco e di denazzo, in una zona del tutto favorevole, quella sotto il passo, fu costruita negli an­ Pianturina - e di brevi gallerie; a ponente, è apparsa tecnicamente la più equilibrata, ni 1878-1882; la seconda, che le sta di fian­ in lontananza, l'azzurra macchia del Ver­ e la più razionale anche sotto l'aspetto co, soltanto verso il 1932. Giorno e notte, bano e, a levante, il rincorrersi delle mura ambientale ed economico. Di essa, appro­ a tutte le ore, sferragliano i treni composti merlate sui dossi di Bellinzona; in basso, la vata, come detto, nel 1965, si tenne conto di carrozze anche provenienti da tutte le distesa pulita e ordinata del Piano di l'anno seguente nella sistemazione della parti della Mitteleuropa. Quelli risalenti da Magadino; più a monte ancora la serie strada cantonale a quattro corsie, per il sud, appena fuori della galleria su al vali­ ininterrotta delle alture fattesi ormai cor­ tratto a monte del bivio di Robasacco, do­ co, riservano ai passeggeri, in vena di pose come ben s'addice alla soglia che ve i tracciati sono pressoché paralleli su esplorazione, che si affacciano al finestri­ immette nel cuore della Svizzera. un lungo tratto. no un gradito e variato paesaggio: profon­ Inizialmente programmato per gli anni di e selvosi awallamenti subito lì sotto; un Giuseppe Mondada 1967 - 1972, questo brano della N 2 era stato poi più volte procrastinato, fino ad occupare l'ultimo posto tra i tratti ticinesi: nello schema dei tempi reso noto nel 1973, la sua costruzione era addirittura fissata per gli anni 1981-198Eì.
    [Show full text]
  • Sviluppo Delle Infrastrutture Ferroviarie Al Sud Delle Alpi
    Sviluppo delle infrastrutture ferroviarie al Sud delle Alpi Documento di lavoro e di approfondimento Autori: Stefan Krebser, Sessa, presidente RailValley Domenico Zucchetti, Massagno, lic. iur HSG, vice presidente RailValley 24 marzo 2014 Sito web: www.railvalley.org E-Mail: [email protected] 1 Sommario 1 Introduzione 3 2 Note sul documento di lavoro e di approfondimento 3 3 Quadro complessivo delle infrastrutture in discussione 4 3.1 Visione complessiva delle varie varianti di AlpTransit a sud di Biasca 4 3.2 Le linee a scartamento ridotto (Tram) 5 4 Ampliamento e ammodernamento dell'infrastruttura ferroviaria a sud delle Alpi 6 4.1 Opere in fase di studio e realizzazione 6 4.1.1 Galleria di Base del Monte Ceneri 6 4.1.2 Terzo binario fra Bellinzona e Giubiasco 7 4.1.3 Ampliamento a doppio binario Contone – Tenero 7 4.1.4 Collegamento Mendrisio Malpensa 7 4.1.5 Binario di regresso a Lugano 7 4.1.6 Nuova linea Alptransit Biasca - Camorino 7 4.1.7 Proseguimento Alptransit a sud di Lugano 8 4.1.8 Potenziamento Bellinzona - Luino 8 4.1.9 Adattamento linee per il transito di 4 m 9 4.1.10 Interventi zona Milano 9 4.2 Le proposte di RailValley 9 4.2.1 Linea ferroviaria multifunzionale Mesolcina - Valtellina 9 4.2.2 Nuova linea Biasca – Giubiasco 11 5 Agglomerato di Lugano 12 5.1 Opere in fase di studio e realizzazione 12 5.1.1 Circonvallazione Agno - Bioggio 12 5.1.2 Tram Bioggio - Lugano 12 5.1.3 Park & Ride a Molinazzo 12 5.1.4 Tram Bioggio-Lamone 13 5.2 Le proposte di RailValley 13 5.2.1 Tram Bioggio – Taverne 13 5.2.2 Park & Ride sulla
    [Show full text]
  • Le Terre Del Ceneri Nossenschaft Und Des Kantons Tessin
    DE Das Projekt wurde von den Departementen der Schweizerischen Eidge- Le Terre del Ceneri nossenschaft und des Kantons Tessin. Die Schweizerischen Bundesbah- nen, SBB CFF FFS, haben über Ceneri 2020 dazu beigetragen. Zahlreiche ORTE ZUM ERLEBEN ZWISCHEN Stiftungen und Verbände gehören zu den Förderern der La Via del Ceneri, die auch von Ticino Turismo und den Regionalen Fremdenverkehrsver- GESCHICHTE, NATUR UND TRADITION bänden Bellinzonese und Nordtessin, von Ascona-Locarno und der Re- Von den Ufern des Lago Maggiore und des Flusses Ticino bis hin gion Lugano unterstützt wird. zu den Hängen des Monte Tamaro verbinden Le Terre del Ceneri das Sopraceneri mit dem Sottoceneri. Partner di destinazione Der schon im Mittelalter erwähnte Monte Ceneri-Pass verband über «Ceneri 2020» Jahrhunderte hinweg die verschiedenen Regionen des Tessins miteinander. Wer von den Alpen zur Poebene hinabstieg und wer nach Nordeuropa hinaufzog, kam durch die Wälder des Ceneri- Gebiets. Heute verlaufen die modernen Verkehrswege unterirdisch, die Verkehrsmittel sind schneller, aber Le Terre del Ceneri mit ihren Architektur, Landschaften und Koordinierung: Gemeinden Cadenazzo, Gambarogno und Monteceneri sind das Christian Rivola mit atelier ribo+ grüne Herz mitten im Tessin, mit unzähligen Geschichten, jede Inhalte, Grafik und Layout: Menge Kultur und Liebe zur eigenen Region. visiva.ch Copyright Fotos: Sertus Image sagl und Regionale Tourismusorganisationen Druck: Fontana Print SA Ascona-Locarno Tourism Tel +41 848 091 091 [email protected] www.ascona-locarno.com
    [Show full text]
  • Bahntechnik Für Den Gotthard-Basistunnel Rail
    32 Schweiz Switzerland Tunnel 4/2011 Bahntechnik für den Rail Technology for the Gotthard-Basistunnel Gotthard Base Tunnel Häufiger, rascher, direkter und bequemer: Die More frequent, faster, more direct and even more Flachbahn durch die Alpen bringt bessere comfortable: the flat trajectory railway through Verbindungen auf der Nord-Süd-Achse. Dafür the Alps will provide better connections on the braucht es modernste bahntechnische Anlagen. north-south axis. Towards this end ultra-modern Sie ermöglichen den Bahnbetrieb im Tunnel rail technology facilities are needed. These cater und schließen die neuen Gleise an das beste- for rail services in the tunnel and link the new hende Netz an. routes up with the existing network. Rund 90 km lang ist die erste Dr. Oliver Bratschi, AlpTransit Gotthard AG, Luzern/CH since the people’s referendum schweizerische Nord-Süd- in 1998 relating to financing the Hochgeschwindigkeitsstrecke wie vor gültigen Ziele seit der The first Swiss north-south high- sophisticated rail modernisation zwischen Zürich und Mailand Volksabstimmung im Jahr 1998 speed route between Zurich and scheme. This can first be facilita- mit den Bauwerken am Gott- über die Finanzierung der an- Milan including the Gotthard and ted through the rail technology hard und am Monte Ceneri. spruchsvollen Bahnmoderni- Monte Ceneri tunnels is some following the actual building of Seit 2009 erfolgt im Gotthard- sierung. Erst die Bahntechnik 90 km long. Since 2009 work on the tunnel. Basistunnel der Einbau der macht dies nach dem eigent- installing the rail technology in Bahntechnik: Schienen, Wei- lichen Tunnelbau überhaupt the Gotthard Base Tunnel has Rail Technology in the chen, Fahrdraht, Stromversor- möglich.
    [Show full text]
  • Monte Ceneri
    dai vicini: maja scendrB. C'è quasi da pen­ Monte Ceneri sare che potevano aver forse ragione i nonni che tentavano di spiegare l'origine del toponimo con cenere (cinis, cineris) ri­ chiamante nel suo colore le foschie molto frequenti al valico. Selve castanili Posto, il Monte Ceneri, selvoso, con Qual­ Baricentro del Cantone re il vento che spira da sud-est special­ che ronchetto e rustici casolari, disabitato Il punto centrale del Cantone Ticino è mente in primavera. Corrente d'aria, que­ almeno per l'addietro. " castagno era l'al­ Mergoscia, villaggio situato sul pendio che sta, ricorrente a intermittenze anche du­ bero che, con la betulla e la quercia, con­ sale rapidissimo dalle sponde del lago arti­ rante il giorno, non certo bene accetta ai trassegnava in larga misura il carattere ficiale allo sbocco della Verzasca. S'usa contadini e ai pescatori quando le loro ambientale. Le castagne mettevano al ri­ dire che se si potesse collocare sulla punta barche a remi proseguivano in direzione paro i paesani dei villaggi limitrofi dal peri­ del campanile una lastra metallica della opposta. Dava loro l'impressione che sca­ colo delle allora possibilissime carestie. grandezza e della forma del Cantone, que­ turisse dalla sella del Ceneri, paragona bile Beni appartenenti in parte anche alle col­ sta rimarrebbe in posizione di equilibriO. quindi, oserei dire, alla bocca dei venti lettività locali erano quelle selve, sui qua­ Però, tenuto calcolo d'altre svariate consi­ magistralmente dipinta da Botticelli nel li però il singolo aveva il diritto (jusplan­ derazioni geografiche e storiche facilmen­ quadro della «Nascita di Venere».
    [Show full text]
  • Myopic Ppps: Risk Allocation and Hidden Liabilities for Taxpayers and Users
    Utilities Policy 48 (2017) 147e156 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Utilities Policy journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jup Myopic PPPs: Risk allocation and hidden liabilities for taxpayers and users * Germa Bel , Paula Bel-Pinana,~ Jordi Rosell GiM-IREA and Universitat de Barcelona, Dep. of Econometrics, Statistics and Applied Economics, Facultat d’Economia i Empresa, John Keynes 1e11, 0034 Barcelona, Spain article info abstract Article history: Drawing on evidence from three case studies, we show how the State's Financial Liability has worked in Received 30 January 2017 assigning risk in large PPP contracts in Spain. Project failure and the concessionaires' bankruptcy have Received in revised form resulted in the government having to assume heavy financial obligations, which have ultimately been 22 April 2017 absorbed by taxpayers and users. In contrast, Spain's leading construction companies, which were also Accepted 8 June 2017 major investors in the concessionaires, have been able to minimize their risk. Myopic PPPs have been Available online 29 July 2017 entered into based on the transference of liabilities to taxpayers and users, and the, consequent, mini- mization of risks for the main private investors. Keywords: © Public-private partnerships 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Concessions Infrastructure projects Transportation Energy 1. Introduction sharing - between the taxpayer and the private partner - and bundling can be considered the two distinctive features of PPPs A public-private partnership e PPP e is a long-term contract1 (Iossa and Martimort, 2015). between public and private parties, the aim of which is to deliver One of the advantages stressed in the economics literature (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • L'organizzazione Territoriale in Ticino
    Piano direttore cantonale – Studio di base L’organizzazione territoriale in Ticino Valutazione e indirizzi per l’elaborazione del Modello di organizzazione territoriale Giugno 2006 L’organizzazione territoriale in Ticino _________________________________________________________________________ Editore Consiglio di Stato del Cantone Ticino Autore Sezione dello sviluppo territoriale, Divisione dello sviluppo territoriale e della mobilità, Dipar timento del territorio Per ulteriori informazioni Sezione dello sviluppo territoriale, viale Stefano Franscini 17, 6500 Bellinzona tel. +41 91 814 37 74 fax +41 91 814 43 44 e-mail [email protected] www.ti.ch/pd Concetto grafico Studio grafico Delucchi & Team via Car vina 5, 6807 Taverne Iconografia e Fotografie Fonte (quando non segnalato): Sezione dello sviluppo territoriale Stampa Tipografia Torriani, Bellinzona Finito di stampare nel mese di settembre 2006 © Dipar timento del territorio, 2006 www.ti.ch/dt 2 Osservatorio dello sviluppo territoriale Giugno 2006 _________________________________________________________________________________ INDICE Premessa.......................................................................................................................................................................5 1. Introduzione: il modello territoriale del PD 90...................................................................................6 1.1. La città–regione 6 1.2. Gli obiettivi per la politica di organizzazione territoriale 7 2. Lo sviluppo territoriale 1980-2000 ...........................................................................................................8
    [Show full text]
  • Rail Freight Corridor 6 Implementation Plan Tt 2015
    Rail Freight Corridor 6 Implementation– Plan 2016 RAIL FREIGHT CORRIDOR 6 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN TT 2015/2016 1 Rail Freight Corridor 6 Implementation– Plan 2016 MODIFICATIONS AND UPDATINGS Evolution Index Date Modification / comments Written by RFF/Task V0 2 April 2013 First version / Gathering of each chapter Force RFF/Task V1 9 April 2013 Update of chapter 1, 3 and 5 Force RFF/Task V2 12 April 2013 Update following / MB Decision Force VTAGRAG 17 April 2013 Update following / TF level Task Force EB version 10 May 2013 AG Comments / MB approval Task Force AG / Executive Board / European Commission Comments V10Nov 2013 6 November 2013 PMO CIDs and Basic elements of TMS V9Dec 2013 9 December 2013 Executive Board Comments for Approval PMO V16Jan 2014 16 January 2014 ERTMS Update PMO V20Mar 2014 20 March 2014 Terminals list and maps update PMO V18Dec 2014 18 December 2014 Extension of the Corridor and general updates PMO V9Jan2015 19 January 2015 Executive Boards Comments PMO V11May2015 11 May 2015 RFF – SNCF Réseau update PMO 2 Rail Freight Corridor 6 Implementation– Plan 2016 Contents 1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................................................... 8 2 Characteristics of RFC 6 and governance ........................................................................................................... 12 2.1 Rail Freight Corridor 6 characteristics ......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]