ERA-Net SG+ Lauch Event Agenda
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
REPORT ON TEST SITE MOBILITY ANALYSIS VERSION 1.0 José Veiga Simão – SUPSI Francesca Cellina – SUPSI Daniele Vettorato - EURAC Andrea Grotto - EURAC Alyona Zubaryeva - EURAC December 2020 INTERNAL REFERENCE Deliverable No.: D 2.2 (2020) Deliverable Name: Report on test site mobility analysis Lead Participant: SUPSI Work Package No.: 2 Task No. & Name: T2.3 - Test sites mobility analysis and comparison Document (File): EVA_D22 Issue (Save) Date: 2020-12-02 ERA-Net Smart Energy Systems This project has received funding in the framework of the joint programming initiative ERA-Net Smart Energy Systems, with support from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme. DOCUMENT STATUS Date Person(s) Organization Author(s) 12-07-2020 José Simão SUPSI 14-07-2020 Andrea Grotto EURAC Alyona Zubaryeva 16-07-2020 Francesca Cellina SUPSI José Simão 04-08-2020 Francesca Cellina SUPSI 12-10-2020 Daniele Vettorato EURAC 28-10-2020 José Simão SUPSI Verification by 31-10-2020 Francesca Cellina SUPSI 27-11-2020 Daniele Vettorato EURAC 27-11-2020 José Simão SUPSI Approval by 27-11-2020 Albedo Bettini SUPSI Approval by 01.12.2020 Roman Rudel SUPSI DOCUMENT SENSITIVITY ☒ Not Sensitive Contains only factual or background information; contains no new or additional analysis, recommendations or policy- relevant statements ☐ Moderately Contains some analysis or interpretation of results; contains Sensitive no recommendations or policy-relevant statements ☐ Sensitive Contains analysis or interpretation of results with policy- relevance and/or recommendations or policy-relevant statements ☐ Highly Sensitive Contains significant analysis or interpretation of results with Confidential major policy-relevance or implications, contains extensive recommendations or policy-relevant statements, and/or contain policy-prescriptive statements. This sensitivity requires SB decision. Deliverable No. 2.2 | Test sites mobility analysis and comparison - 2 - TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES AND TABLES ........................................................................ 5 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................... 7 1. SOUTH TYROL – ALTO ADIGE ........................................................... 9 1.1. Mobility infrastructures and public transport offer ............................................ 12 1.1.1. Infrastructure (roads, railways, cycling lanes and shared mobility stations) .... 12 1.1.2. Public transport offer (rail, road and cable transport) ................................... 17 1.2. Travel Flows and modal usage ...................................................................... 20 1.2.1. Train passenger use ............................................................................... 21 1.2.2. Road public transport use ........................................................................ 21 1.2.3. Cable car use ......................................................................................... 22 1.2.4. Road vehicles use and flows ..................................................................... 22 1.2.5. Cycling flows ......................................................................................... 24 1.3. Ownership of vehicles, driving licenses and public transport season tickets ......... 27 1.4. Modal Split ................................................................................................ 30 1.5. Trip purposes ............................................................................................. 33 1.6. Local current projects promoting more sustainable mobility .............................. 34 1.7. Future local game changer projects ............................................................... 35 2. TICINO ........................................................................................... 38 2.1. Mobility infrastructures and public transport offer ............................................ 40 2.1.1. Infrastructure (roads, railways, cycling lanes and shared mobility stations) .... 40 2.1.2. Public transport offer (rail and road transport) ............................................ 43 2.2. Travel Flows .............................................................................................. 45 2.2.1. Train passenger flows ............................................................................. 46 2.2.2. Road public transport flows ...................................................................... 48 2.2.3. Road vehicles flows ................................................................................ 49 2.2.4. Cycling flows ......................................................................................... 51 2.2.5. Flows for work commuting ....................................................................... 52 2.3. Ownership of vehicles, driving licenses and public transport season tickets ......... 55 2.4. Daily travel distance and duration ................................................................. 59 2.5. Modal Split ................................................................................................ 61 2.6. Trip purposes ............................................................................................. 64 2.7. Local current projects promoting more sustainable mobility .............................. 65 2.8. Future local game changer projects ............................................................... 67 2.9. Final considerations - Ticino ......................................................................... 69 3. TEST SITES COMPARISON .............................................................. 71 REFERENCES .......................................................................................... 73 Deliverable No. 2.2 | Test sites mobility analysis and comparison - 3 - Disclaimer The content and views expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinion of the ERA-Net SES initiative. Any reference given does not necessarily imply the endorsement by ERA-Net SES. About ERA-Net Smart Energy Systems ERA-Net Smart Energy Systems (ERA-Net SES) is a transnational joint programming platform of 30 national and regional funding partners for initiating co-creation and promoting energy system innovation. The network of owners and managers of national and regional public funding programs along the innovation chain provides a sustainable and service oriented joint programming platform to finance projects in thematic areas like Smart Power Grids, Regional and Local Energy Systems, Heating and Cooling Networks, Digital Energy and Smart Services, etc. Co-creating with partners that help to understand the needs of relevant stakeholders, we team up with intermediaries to provide an innovation eco- system supporting consortia for research, innovation, technical development, piloting and demonstration activities. These co-operations pave the way towards implementation in real-life environments and market introduction. Beyond that, ERA-Net SES provides a Knowledge Community, involving key demo projects and experts from all over Europe, to facilitate learning between projects and programs from the local level up to the European level. www.eranet-smartenergysystems.eu About the EVA project The EVA project aims to support urban and regional institutions to steer the transition towards electric, connected and autonomous vehicles exploring innovative territorial infrastructures capable of effectively supporting this transition. The project started in September 2019 and the project consortium has three partners: SUPSI from Switzerland, EURAC from Italy and AICO from Austria; and one affiliate partner: MINES ParisTech from France. For more detailed information we invite you to visit the project website evaproject.eu About this deliverable This deliverable is one output of the work package 2 – Pilot regions. The work package 2 is the starting point of the research work of the project EVA and aims to provide a detailed picture of the current mobility in the two pilot regions (Ticino in Switzerland and South Tyrol, in Italy) of the project, that will serve as baseline for the mobility scenarios of the work package 3 and the simulations of the work package 4. This deliverable reports the main characteristics of the two project test sites (Ticino and South Tyrol). Firstly, the two tests sites are presented and analysed and afterwards the two sites are compared. Deliverable No. 2.2 | Test sites mobility analysis and comparison - 4 - LIST OF FIGURES AND TABLES Figure 1 – Evolution of GDP and mobility demand 1995-2017 (European Commission, 2019) ................................................................................................................. 7 Figure 2 - Modal split of inland passengers in the EU28-EFTA-Turkey, 2016 (Eurostat, 2019) ................................................................................................................. 8 Figure 3 - South Tyrol-Alto Adige population (ASTAT, 2019) ....................................... 9 Figure 4 - TEN-T Corridors (European Commission, 2020) ........................................ 10 Figure 5 - Province of South Tyrol-Alto Adige (Source: own elaboration adapted from TEN-T Corridors (European Commission, 2020)) ..................................................... 10 Figure 6 - Economic sectors and number of companies in South Tyrol-Alto Adige (ASTAT, 2019) ..................................................................................................