Operation Sealion: 24 September, 1940

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Operation Sealion: 24 September, 1940 OPERATION SEALION: 24 SEPTEMBER, 1940. STRATEGIC OVERVIEW Herr Hitler has decided, in light of the illogical Britischer refusal to come to peace terms, to proceed with the invasion of England. Generalfeldmarschall Gerd von Runstedt has been appointed as Commander-in-Chief (CIC) of Heeresgruppe A , which is to land on the south-east coast of England, establish a bridgehead, capture at least two workable ports and airfields, eliminate all military opposition, and advance as far as the Second Operational Objective shown on the map below. The Luftwaffe and Kriegsmarine will lend their support to the Army’s efforts… STRATEGIC MAP This is the overall picture of the general invasion area of Heeresgruppe A , consisting of 9 Armee & 16 Armee : In addition, you will be given more detailed maps (Ordnance Survey (OS) Series, 1 square = 1 kilometre) which are used to plan your deployments and attacks in more detail. ORDER OF BATTLE (see separate sheet for detailed orbats – all army units are elite , some are fanatics ): • 16.Armee — Generaloberst Ernst Busch (Demarcation Area East = Folkestone to Hastings) First Wave • XIII.Armee-Korps — General Heinrich-Gottfried von VietinghoffgenanntScheel . o 17.Infanterie-Division o 35.Infanterie-Division o Luftwaffe II./Flak-Regiment 14 • VII.Armee-Korps — Generaloberst Eugen Ritter von Schobert o 1.Gebirgs-Division o 7.Infanterie-Division o Luftwaffe I./Flak-Regiment 26 • Independent tank units: o Amphibious Tank Battalion A o Amphibious Tank Battalion B o Tank Detachment 100 (3 flammpanzer companies) o 4 StugIII panzerjaeger batteries o 4 Panzerjaeger I AT companies (1 per Division) o 1st Battalion Bau-Lehr-Regiment z.b.V. 800 Brandenburg (fanatics) Second Wave • V.Armee-Korps — General Richard Ruoff o 12.Infanterie-Division o 30.Infanterie-Division • XXXI.Armee-Korps — General der Panzertruppen Georg-Hans Reinhardt o 8.Panzer-Division o 10.Panzer-Division o 29.Infanterie-Division (mot.) o Infanterie-Regiment (mot.) Großdeutschland (fanatics) o Infanterie-Regiment Leibstandarte SS Adolf Hitler (mot) (fanatics) Third Wave • IV. Armee-Korps — General Viktor von Schwedler o 24.Infanterie-Division o 58.Infanterie-Division • XXXII.Armee-Korps — General Walter Kuntze o 45.Infanterie-Division o 164.Infanterie-Division • 9.Armee — Generaloberst Adolf Strauss (Demarcation Area West = Hastings to Rottingdean) First Wave • XXVIII.Armee-Korps — General Erich von Manstein o 26.Infanterie-Division o 34.Infanterie-Division • VIII.Armee-Korps — General Walter Heitz o 6.Gebirgs-Division o 8.Infanterie-Division o 28.Infanterie-Division • Independent tank units: o Amphibious Tank Battalion C o Amphibious Tank Battalion D o 4 StugIII panzerjaeger companies o 5 Panzerjaeger I AT companies (1 per Division) o 3rd Battalion Bau-Lehr-Regiment z.b.V. 800 Brandenburg (fanatics) Second Wave • XV.Armee-Korps — Generaloberst Hermann Hoth o 4.Panzer-Division o 7.Panzer-Division o 20.Infanterie-Division (mot.) Third Wave • XXIV.Armee-Korps General Leo FreiherrGeyr von Schweppenburg o 15.Infanterie-Division o 78.Infanterie-Division In addition, the airborne troops of the 7 th Fliegerdivision are available to support the first wave landings: o 7.Flieger-Division (Major-General Kurt Student) Division HQ 1st Parachute Rifle Regiment 2nd Parachute Rifle Regiment 3rd Parachute/Glider Rifle Regiment Paratroop Machine Gun Battalion 7 Paratroop Artillery Detachment 7 Paratroop Engineer Battalion 7 (4 companies) Paratroop Anti-tank Detachment 7 o 22.Infanterie-Division (Luftlande) Infanterie-Regiment 16 Infanterie-Regiment 47 Infanterie-Regiment 65 Artillerie-Regiment 22 Panzerabwehr-Abteilung 22 (anti-tank) Aufklärungs-Abteilung 22 (reconnaissance) Pionier-Bataillon 22 7 Flieger-Division is dropped by parachute; there are also enough gliders available to land the fighting companies of one Parachute Regiment if preferred. 22 Division must be held over to land at an airfield (once captured). The Division HQ can be attached to any landing. AIR SUPPORT – LUFTWAFFE (Generalfeldmarschall Albert Kesselring) The Luftwaffe was fully committed to the invasion, and was tasked with three strategic objectives: 1. Attack British ships, harbours and economic centres; 2. Neutralise the RAF, then destroy economic and communications centres; 3. Provide air cover and support for the invasion. The task of dealing with the first objective fell largely to Luftflotte 5 , as it was experienced in these types of operations. The other two objectives were to be achieved by Luftflotte 2 and 3 respectively; Luftflotte 2 was assigned to assist and protect 16 Armee , and Luftflotte 3 was assigned to assist and protect 9 Armee . In addition, the Luftwaffe also controlled the airborne forces assigned to the invasion. LUFTFLOTTE 2 (assisting 16 Armee) : JG3 (9), JG26 (9), JG51 (9), JG52 (6), JG54 (9): 42 x Me109E/F superior fighter squadrons (3 flights/squadron) ZG26 (9), ZG76 (6): 15 x Me110 fighter squadrons (3 flights/squadron) StG1 (6), StG2 (6), StG77 (9): 21 x Ju87 dive-bomber squadrons (2 flights/squadron) KG2 (9), KG3 (9): 18 x Do17 medium bomber squadrons (2 flights/squadron) KG4 (6), KG53 (9): 15 x He111 medium bomber squadrons (2 flights/squadron) KG4 (3), KG76 (3): 6 x Ju88 medium bomber squadrons (2 flights/squadron) 4 x reconnaissance squadrons (mixed aircraft) (3 flights/squadron), plus: Erprobungsgruppe 210 (3 x squadrons of ’special’ Me110’s armed with Seilbomben to be dropped on enemy power lines immediately before an invasion. These were designed to disrupt electricity power grids over South-east England, thereby sowing confusion and panic, and disrupting communications.) Seilbomben can be dropped on any daylight turn, or on turn 2 of a day if desired (in which case the Me110 is at risk of crashing (10 on a UD10) – it was a distinctly hazardous mission!): on 3+ on a UD6, communications into/from the area covered by the aircraft counter (7 x 7 squares) are disrupted for 24 hours. LUFTFLOTTE 3 (assisting 9 Armee) : JG2 (9), JG27 (9), JG53 (9): 27 x Me109E/F superior fighter squadrons (3 flights/squadron) ZG2 (9): 9 x Me110 fighter squadrons (3 flights/squadron) StG3 (6): 6 x Ju87 dive-bomber squadrons (2 flights/squadron) KG76 (6): 6 x Do17 medium bomber squadrons (2 flights/squadron) KG1 (9), KG27 (9), KG55 (9): 27 x He111 medium bomber squadrons (2 flights/squadron) KG51 (9), KG54 (6): 15 x Ju88 medium bomber squadrons (2 flights/squadron) 4 x reconnaissance squadrons (mixed aircraft) (3 flights/squadron) All Luftwaffe units (ground and air) are Regular troops for morale and combat purposes. GAME MECHANICS The game is played in two ways, which are interlinked using a top-down approach: The Strategic Game , played on the original OS maps with counters representing the units. Where contact is made between opposing forces, battles are resolved either using the Combat Results Tables (CRT) , or ... A Tactical Battle is fought on a wargames table with miniatures representing the units involved. The results are then fed back up to the relevant Commanders by the Umpire. Linking both of these methodologies together means that ultimate flexibility can be employed regarding where and how the battles/engagements are fought, ranging from PBEM (Play by e-mail) campaigns through to mega games between opposing teams cloistered away somewhere for the week...! The Umpire has a very active role, which is quite intentional, in order to simulate the historical and technical realities and limitations that existed at the time. It also means the Umpire should enjoy the game as much as the players do! THE STRATEGIC GAME INTRODUCTION The Strategic Game is played on copies of the original Ordnance Survey (OS) maps (New Popular Edition, published 1940 - 1947), using counters to represent the historical units involved (down to company level, or where necessary down to platoon level). Battles can be resolved using the Combat Results Tables (CRT) or by setting up a Tactical Battle on a wargames table with miniatures and an appropriate quick play rule set. We have a favourite set called Quick Fire (which we developed, of course!), which dovetails perfectly with the Strategic Game using 6mm figures. MAP SCALE / TIME FRAME: Each square on the OS maps is 1 kilometre square, and is equivalent to a 24” x 24” square on a wargames table. The map reference of each square is a 4 digit number; the first 2 digits refer to the line running to the left of the square, and the second 2 digits refer to the line running along the bottom of the square, e.g.: Dymchurch is in square 1029 of OS map 173 (East Kent). The invasion commences on 24 September 1940, with the option of the Luftwaffe conducting ‘softening up’ sorties from 21 September onwards. Each day is divided into Day Segments of approx. 3 hours each; each Day Segment = 1 Game Turn. There is a handy Game Turn Record at the end of these Strategic Game Rules. STRATEGIC GAME TURN SEQUENCE Each Day Segment follows this Sequence of Play. Most phases are intentionally simultaneous, except in cases where this is impossible (e.g. attack/defence battles): Command & • Players write orders for their units & submit them to the Umpire. Phase 1: Control • Umpire checks for random events that may affect play. • Umpire moves units as per players’ orders, resolves potential movement Phase 2: First Movement conflicts, and feeds back to the players observed enemy units and contact situations, as well as any random events that may affect them. • Players react to contact situations by issuing Withdraw, Hold or Attack orders, and perform any actions required by any random events. • Umpire resolves players’ reactions, feeds back the new unit positions and Phase 3: Reaction declares battles; players decide whether to fight Tactical Battles or resolve them as Map Battles using these Strategic Rules. • Players issue orders for Air Support , Smoke Screens , and fire orders for units that are ordered to Hold /not involved in any other attacks.
Recommended publications
  • Die Fritsch-Krise Im Frühjahr 1938. Neun Dokumente Aus Dem Nachlaß Des Generalobersten
    Dokumentation Horst Mühleisen Die Fritsch-Krise im Frühjahr 1938. Neun Dokumente aus dem Nachlaß des Generalobersten I. Die Bedeutung der Dokumente Es gibt Skandale, die lange fortwirken und auch die Forschung immer noch be- schäftigen. Zu diesen gehört jener, der mit dem Namen des Generalfeldmarschalls Werner von Blomberg, des Reichskriegsministers und Oberbefehlshabers der Wehr- macht, sowie des Generalobersten Werner Freiherrn von Fritsch, des Oberbefehls- habers des Heeres, verbunden ist. Der Anlaß für Blombergs Entlassung am 4. Februar 1938 war seine Heirat mit einer Frau, deren Vorleben als kompromittiert galt. Fritsch aber war der Homose- xualität, des Vergehens nach § 175 Strafgesetzbuch, beschuldigt worden. Auch er erhielt am selben Tage, dem 4. Februar, seinen Abschied. Um die gegen Fritsch er- hobenen Vorwürfe aufzuklären, ermittelte sowohl die Geheime Staatspolizei als auch das Reichskriegsgericht. Dies waren die Tatsachen, die im Frühjahr 1938 indessen nur wenigen Perso- nen verlaßlich bekannt waren. Der Öffentlichkeit war mitgeteilt worden, die Ver- abschiedung von Blomberg und Fritsch sei aus gesundheitlichen Gründen erfolgt. Wenige Jahre nach Kriegsende, 1949, veröffentlichte Johann Adolf Graf Kiel- mansegg, Fritschs Neffe, eine Darstellung über den Prozeß des Reichskriegsge- richts gegen den Generalobersten1. Die persönlichen Zeugnisse, die der ehemali- ge Oberbefehlshaber des Heeres hinterlassen hat, waren indessen spärlich, da Fritsch keine umfangreiche Korrespondenz führte. Ferner standen Kielmansegg die Prozeßakten nicht zur Verfügung, da sie verbrannt waren. Fotokopien der Ak- ten und Verhandlungsstenogramme, die in nicht sehr zahlreicher Ausfertigung vorlagen, ebenso wie die Handakten des Verteidigers, des Grafen Rüdiger von der Goltz, wurden durch Bombenangriffe vernichtet2. Ob die Protokolle, die Reichs- kriegsgerichtsrat Dr. Karl Sack während des Prozesses führte, tatsächlich nach Kriegsende in die Hände der amerikanischen Besatzungsmacht gefallen sind3, ist ungewiß; bis heute sind sie nicht wieder aufgetaucht.
    [Show full text]
  • Order of Battle, Mid-September 1940 Army Group a Commander-In-Chief
    Operation “Seelöwe” (Sea Lion) Order of Battle, mid-September 1940 Army Group A Commander-in-Chief: Generalfeldmarschall Gerd von Rundstedt Chief of the General Staff: General der Infanterie Georg von Sodenstern Operations Officer (Ia): Oberst Günther Blumentritt 16th Army Commander-in-Chief: Generaloberst Ernst Busch Chief of the General Staff: Generalleutnant Walter Model Operations Officer (Ia): Oberst Hans Boeckh-Behrens Luftwaffe Commander (Koluft) 16th Army: Oberst Dr. med. dent. Walter Gnamm Division Command z.b.V. 454: Charakter als Generalleutnant Rudolf Krantz (This staff served as the 16th Army’s Heimatstab or Home Staff Unit, which managed the assembly and loading of all troops, equipment and supplies; provided command and logistical support for all forces still on the Continent; and the reception and further transport of wounded and prisoners of war as well as damaged equipment. General der Infanterie Albrecht Schubert’s XXIII Army Corps served as the 16th Army’s Befehlsstelle Festland or Mainland Command, which reported to the staff of Generalleutnant Krantz. The corps maintained traffic control units and loading staffs at Calais, Dunkirk, Ostend, Antwerp and Rotterdam.) FIRST WAVE XIII Army Corps: General der Panzertruppe Heinric h-Gottfried von Vietinghoff genannt Scheel (First-wave landings on English coast between Folkestone and New Romney) – Luftwaffe II./Flak-Regiment 14 attached to corps • 17th Infantry Division: Generalleutnant Herbert Loch • 35th Infantry Division: Generalleutnant Hans Wolfgang Reinhard VII Army
    [Show full text]
  • 1940 Commandés À Plusieurs Chantiers Navals Néerlandais, Seuls Quatre Exemplaires (T-61 À T-64) Doivent Être Poursuivis, Les Autres Seront Annulés
    Appendice 1 Ordre de bataille de l’Armée Rouge sur le front au 1er juin 1943 (forces principales) (pour les deux Fronts Baltes – les indications pour les autres Fronts ne sont entièrement valables qu’à partir du 1er juillet) 1er Front de la Baltique (M.M. Popov) Du sud de Parnu (Estonie) au sud de Võru (Estonie). – 1ère Armée (A.V. Kourkine) – 4e Armée (N.I. Gusev) – 7e Armée (A.N. Krutikov) – 42e Armée (V.I. Morozov) – 12e Corps Blindé (V.V. Butkov) – 15e Corps Blindé (F.N. Rudkin) Aviation subordonnée : 13e Armée Aérienne (S.D. Rybalchenko) 2e Front de la Baltique (K.A. Meretskov) Du sud de Pskov (Russie) au nord de Vitebsk (Biélorussie). – 27e Armée (N.E. Berzarine) – 34e Armée (A.I. Lopatine) – 39e Armée (A.I. Zigin) – 55e Armée (V.P. Smiridov) – 13e Corps Blindé (B.S. Bakharov) – 14e Corps Blindé (I.F. Kirichenko) – 101e Brigade Blindée lourde Aviation subordonnée : 14e Armée Aérienne (I.P. Zhuravlev) 1er Front de Biélorussie (A.I. Eremenko) De Vitebsk (Biélorussie) à Orsha (Biélorussie) – 20e Armée (P.A. Kourouchkine) – 1ère Armée de la Garde (I.M. Chistiakov) – 3e Armée de la Garde (I.G. Zakharkine) – 63e Armée (V.I. Kuznetsov) – 18e Corps Blindé (A.S. Burdeiny) Aviation subordonnée : 2e Armée Aérienne (N.F. Naumenko) 2e Front de Biélorussie (I.S. Koniev) D’Orsha (Biélorussie) à Gomel (Biélorussie). – 2e Armée de la Garde (L.A. Govorov) – 29e Armée (I.M. Managrov) – 15e Armée (I.I. Fediouninski) – 54e Armée (S.V. Roginski) – 3e Armée de Choc (M.A. Purkayev) – 7e Corps Blindé (A.G.
    [Show full text]
  • Deutsche Generäle in Britischer Gefangenschaft 1942–1945. Eine
    289 Von vielen deutschen Generälen des Zweiten Weltkriegs sind häufig nur die Laufbahndaten bekannt; Briefe und Tagebücher liegen nur wenige vor. Für die For­ schung sind sie oft genug nur eingeschränkt zugänglich. So fällt es nach wie vor schwer, zu beurteilen, wie die Generale selbst die militärischen und politischen Geschehnisse der Zeit zwischen 1939 und 1945 rezipiert haben und welche Folgerungen sie daraus zogen. Wichtige Aufschlüsse über ihre Kenntnisse von den nationalsozialistischen Massenmorden oder ihr Urteil über den deutschen Widerstand gegen Hitler bieten jedoch die Abhörprotokolle deutscher Stabsoffiziere in britischer Kriegsgefangen­ schaft. Sönke Neitzel Deutsche Generäle in britischer Gefangenschaft 1942-1945 Eine Auswahledition der Abhörprotokolle des Combined Services Detailed Interrogation Centre UK Die deutsche Generalität hat sich der öffentlichen Reflexion über ihre Rolle wäh­ rend des Zweiten Weltkrieges weitgehend verschlossen. Das Bild, das sie vor allem in ihren Memoiren von sich selbst zeichnete, läßt sich verkürzt auf die Formel bringen: Sie hat einen sauberen Krieg geführt, hatte von Kriegsverbrechen größe­ ren Ausmaßes keine oder kaum Kenntnis, und die militärische Niederlage war zu einem Gutteil den dilettantischen Eingriffen Hitlers als Obersten Befehlshaber in die Kriegführung zuzuschreiben. Es erübrigt sich näher darauf einzugehen, daß dieses Bild von der Geschichts­ wissenschaft längst gründlich widerlegt worden ist. Aber nach wie vor wissen wir wenig darüber, wie die Generäle die Zeit zwischen 1939 und 1945 rezipiert haben, welche Kenntnis sie von den militärischen und politischen Geschehnissen hatten, die über ihren engen Arbeitsbereich hinausgingen, und welche Schlußfolgerungen sie hieraus zogen. Zur Durchleuchtung dieses Komplexes ist vor allem der Rück­ griff auf persönliche Quellen wie Briefe und Tagebücher notwendig, die allerdings nur von einem kleinen Personenkreis vorliegen und zudem oft auch nur beschränkt zugänglich sind, da sie sich in Privatbesitz befinden1.
    [Show full text]
  • Kiev 1941: Hitler's Battle for Supremacy in the East
    Kiev 1941 In just four weeks in the summer of 1941 the German Wehrmacht wrought unprecedented destruction on four Soviet armies, conquering central Ukraine and killing or capturing three-quarters of a million men. This was the battle of Kiev – one of the largest and most decisive battles of World War II and, for Hitler and Stalin, a battle of crucial importance. For the first time, David Stahel charts the battle’s dramatic course and after- math, uncovering the irreplaceable losses suffered by Germany’s ‘panzer groups’ despite their battlefield gains, and the implications of these losses for the German war effort. He illuminates the inner workings of the German army as well as the experiences of ordinary soldiers, showing that with the Russian winter looming and Soviet resistance still unbroken, victory came at huge cost and confirmed the turning point in Germany’s war in the east. David Stahel is an independent researcher based in Berlin. His previous publications include Operation Barbarossa and Germany’s Defeat in the East (Cambridge, 2009). Downloaded from Cambridge Books Online by IP 210.212.129.125 on Sat Dec 22 18:00:30 WET 2012. http://ebooks.cambridge.org/ebook.jsf?bid=CBO9781139034449 Cambridge Books Online © Cambridge University Press, 2012 Kiev 1941 Hitler’s Battle for Supremacy in the East David Stahel Downloaded from Cambridge Books Online by IP 210.212.129.125 on Sat Dec 22 18:00:30 WET 2012. http://ebooks.cambridge.org/ebook.jsf?bid=CBO9781139034449 Cambridge Books Online © Cambridge University Press, 2012 cambridge university press Cambridge, New York, Melbourne, Madrid, Cape Town, Singapore, Sao˜ Paulo, Delhi, Tokyo, Mexico City Cambridge University Press The Edinburgh Building, Cambridge cb2 8ru,UK Published in the United States of America by Cambridge University Press, New York www.cambridge.org Information on this title: www.cambridge.org/9781107014596 c David Stahel 2012 This publication is in copyright.
    [Show full text]
  • Prussian Apocalypse: the Fall of Danzig 1945 Free Ebook
    FREEPRUSSIAN APOCALYPSE: THE FALL OF DANZIG 1945 EBOOK Egbert Kieser,Tony Le Tissier | 256 pages | 19 Jul 2012 | Pen & Sword Books Ltd | 9781848846746 | English | South Yorkshire, United Kingdom Prussian Apocalypse: The Fall of Danzig, - Egbert Kieser - Google книги Harrowing collection of first-hand accounts of the conquest of Prussia and Danzig by Russian forces in the winter and spring ofas related largely by civilians though the boundary between Prussian Apocalypse : The Fall of Danzig, Egbert Kieser. Egbert Kiesers graphic account of the Red Armys assault on East Prussia in is one of the classic histories of the destruction of Hitlers Germany, and it has never before been available in English. Using extensive, firsthand, unforgettable eyewitness testimony, he documents in riveting detail the catastrophe that overtook German civilians and soldiers as they fled from the Soviet onslaught and their world collapsed around them. Tony Le Tissier, in this fluent and vivid translation of the original German text, brings to bear all his expert knowledge of the military defeat of the German armies in the East and the enormity of the human disaster that went Prussian Apocalypse: The Fall of Danzig 1945 it. Egbert Kieser was born in in Bad Salzungen, Thringen and studied philosophy and the history of art at Heidelberg University. He worked as a freelance journalist, writer and editor. The Eastern Front. Precipitate Flight. The Last Trains. The Fall of Elbing. The German 4th Armys Breakout. Over the Ice of the Frisches Haff. The Sinking of the Wilhelm Gustloff. The Sinking of the General von Steuben. Westwards over the Vistula.
    [Show full text]
  • Die Entwicklung Des Nationalsozialistischen
    Eingereicht von Horst Pichler Angefertigt am Institut für Kanonistik, Europäische Rechtsgeschichte und Religionsrecht Erstbeurteiler / -beurteilerin Univ.Prof. DDr. Herbert Kalb Die Entwicklung des Zweitbeurteiler/ -beurteilerin Univ.-Prof. Dr. Alois Birklbauer nationalsozialistischen Mitbetreuung Mag. Dr. Andreas Hölzl Militärstrafrechts von 1933 bis 1945 Oktober 2018 Dissertation zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades Doktor der Rechtswissenschaften im Doktoratsstudium der Rechtswissenschaften JOHANNES KEPLER UNIVERSITÄT LINZ Altenberger Straße 69 4040 Linz, Österreich www.jku.at DVR 0093696 EIDESSTATTLICHE ERKLÄRUNG Ich erkläre an Eides statt, dass ich die vorliegende Dissertation selbstständig und ohne fremde Hilfe verfasst, andere als die angegebenen Quellen und Hilfsmittel nicht benutzt bzw. die wörtlich oder sinngemäß entnommenen Stellen als solche kenntlich gemacht habe. Die vorliegende Dissertation ist mit dem elektronisch übermittelten Textdokument identisch. Wien, 22. Oktober 2018 Unterschrift 22. Oktober 2018 Horst Pichler 2/226 Inhaltsverzeichnis Abkürzungsverzeichnis ........................................................................................................................ 5 I. Einleitung ...................................................................................................................................... 9 II. Die Entwicklung des Militärstrafrechts bis zur Machtübernahme ................................................. 13 A. Grundzüge der Entwicklung des Militärstrafrechts in Deutschland bis
    [Show full text]
  • Red Army Operations in Theory and Practice, 1936-1942
    University of Calgary PRISM: University of Calgary's Digital Repository Graduate Studies The Vault: Electronic Theses and Dissertations 2014-09-30 Ten Principles of Soviet Operational Art: Red Army Operations in Theory and Practice, 1936-1942 Brisson, Kevin Brisson, K. (2014). Ten Principles of Soviet Operational Art: Red Army Operations in Theory and Practice, 1936-1942 (Unpublished master's thesis). University of Calgary, Calgary, AB. doi:10.11575/PRISM/27996 http://hdl.handle.net/11023/1872 master thesis University of Calgary graduate students retain copyright ownership and moral rights for their thesis. You may use this material in any way that is permitted by the Copyright Act or through licensing that has been assigned to the document. For uses that are not allowable under copyright legislation or licensing, you are required to seek permission. Downloaded from PRISM: https://prism.ucalgary.ca UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY Ten Principles of Soviet Operational Art: Red Army Operations in Theory and Practice, 1936-1942 by Kevin M. Brisson A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF MILITARY AND STRATEGIC STUDIES CENTRE FOR MILITARY AND STRATEGIC STUDIES CALGARY, ALBERTA SEPTEMBER, 2014 ©Kevin M. Brisson 2014 2 Abstract Over the course of the Great Patriotic War, fought from 22 June, 1941 to 9 May, 1945, there was a dramatic transformation in the way the Red Army conducted battle. From an army on the cusp of annihilation to one that quickly recovered to vanquish the invading forces of Nazi Germany, this resurgence can be traced in part to its mastery of operational art.
    [Show full text]
  • [email protected]
    Armeeoberkommando 9 (Ninth Army)* The Ninth Army was formed on May lU, 19^0, when part of Theater Command East (Oberbefehlshaber Ost) was given this designation. It was transferred to the western front, first as a reserve unit and later as an active unit, where it remained until the end of March 19^1. The army served on the central sec- tor of the eastern front from June 19^1 until the end of the war. It with- drew from the Upper Dnieper area in July I^hk to the region west of Brest- Litovsk, then moved to the Warsaw area. The 9"th Army was responsible for the defense of Wave SIT during the autumn of 19^ and was heavily engaged during the Soviet offensive in this area. It withdrew from the Warsaw sector and across central Poland in January 19^5j during the Soviet winter offensive, and disbanded on May 8, 19^5- Commanders of the Ninth Army between 19^-0 and 19^5 were Generals Johannes Blaskowitz, Adolf Strauss, Walter Model, Heinrich von Vietinghoff, Josef Harpe, Hans Jordan, Nickolaus von Vormann, Smilo von Luttwitz, and Theodor Busse. Item Dates Item No. Roll 1st Frame Ic/AO, Anlagen 6-23 z. TB, Verschiedenes, Feldgend., Tatigkeitsbericht der Geheimen Feldpolizei, Gruppe 5&0. Monthly reports of Secret Military Police Unit 580 pertaining to security and intelligence activities, partisan resistance, and the morale of the civilian population in occupied Russia; instructions for counterintelligence operations; and a list of suspected enemy agents. Apr 1 - Jun 30, 19^2 26837/16 1689 1 Ic/AO, Anlagen 6-33 z.
    [Show full text]
  • A Las Puertas De Stalingrado
    DE PRÓXIMA APARICIÓN: David M. DAVID M. GLANTZ Tetralogía de Stalingrado (vols. II - IV) La confrontación entre las fuerzas alemanas y soviéticas A LAS PUERTAS DE Coronel retirado del Ejército de EE. UU., en Stalingrado fue un choque titánico a una escala sin Glantz está considerado el mayor experto precedentes, un punto de inflexión en la Segunda Guerra occidental en la operativa del Ejército Rojo Mundial y el símbolo imperecedero de su devastación, a la durante la Gran Guerra Patriótica. Glantz que se han dedicado abundantes obras. Y, sin embargo, TETRALOGÍA STALINGRADO es fundador y ha sido director de la Journal es mucha la información que se ha malinterpretado u DE of Slavic Military Studies y es miembro de ocultado sobre ella, como demuestra David M. Glantz, la Academia de Ciencias Naturales de la STALINGRADO TETRALOGÍA DE STALINGRADO - VOLUMEN I autoridad mundial sobre el Frente del Este y el Ejército Federación Rusa. Entre sus numerosos libros Rojo durante la Segunda Guerra Mundial. VOLUMEN I David M. Glantz destacan Stumbling Colossus, Colossus Armagedón Reborn, Barbarossa Derailed, Zhukov’s en Stalingrado con Este primer volumen de su obra magna, A las puertas de Jonathan M. House Greatest Defeat, The Battle for Leningrad y Stalingrado, respaldado por fuentes antes desconocidas Choque de titanes, también publicado por o poco estudiadas, proporciona la narración definitiva Desperta Ferro Ediciones. de la fase de apertura la campaña. Glantz combina los informes oficiales diarios de ambos bandos para producir JONATHAN M. HOUSE un texto de minucioso detalle y nuevas interpretaciones. Coronel retirado del Ejército de EE. UU., es Una crónica reveladora que inicia una tetralogía –cuyos profesor de historia militar en la US Army siguientes volúmenes describirán la encarnizada batalla War College, en Fort Leavenworth, Kansas.
    [Show full text]
  • Der Führer Ehrt Die Heldische 6.Armee Ä I S R
    Elniclprelt 10 Rpf- Sonntag 15 Rpf. DIE GROSSE HEIMATZEITUNG IM OSTEN DES BEICHSGAUES WAßTHELAND MIT DEN AMTLICHEN BEKANNTMACHUNGEN Erscheint täglich als Morgenzeitung. Verlag Lltzmannstadt, Adolf-Hltler-Str. 88. Fernruf 254-20. Schrlltlellung: Ulrlch- Monatlich 2,50 RM. (elnschlleBIldl 40 Rpf. Trlgerlohn). bei Postbczug 2,92 RM. einschließlich 42 Rpf. Postgeböhr ut.d von-Hutten-Str. 35, Fernruf 185-80/81. Sprechstunden der Schrittlcltung werktags (auBer sonnabends): 10 bis 12 Uhr 21 Rpl. Zeitungsgebulu bzw. die entsprechenden Beförderungskosten bei Postzeitungsgut oder Bahnhofzeitungsversand 26. Jahrgang / Nr. 32 _ Montag, 1. Februar 1913 r Der Führer ehrt die heldische 6.Armee VonÄiS Reichsminister Dr. WilhelmÄ FS r Ic U Unsere Gegner ha• ben als Grund für Generaloberst Paulus, Stalingrads Verteidiger, zum Generalfeldmarschall befördert die ihnen zugefügten schweren Niederlagen Aus dem Fuhrerhauptquartier, 31. Januar nen Kreuze und wurde nach dem Weltkriegs• lichen Feuer durchgeführten kühnen Erkun• und als Vorwand für Der FUhrer hat Generaloberst Paulus, den ende in das Hunderttausend-Mann-Heer über• dung zu danken. Am 4. September 1940 ver• die auch von ihnen Oberbefehlshaber der ruhmreichen 6. Armee, nommen. Er tat Dienst im damaligen Reichs• lieh ihm der Führer das Ritterkreuz des Eiser• erwarteten vernich• den heldenhaften Verteidiger von Stalingrad, wehrministerium, an der Artillerieschule und nen Kreuzes und am 21. Dezember W2 als 156. tenden Schläge der bei verschiedenen Truppenteilen, u. a. als Ab• Soldaten der deutschen Wehrmacht das Zukunft Immer wie• zum Generalfeldmarschall befördert. Gleich• teilungskommandeur im Artillerie-Regiment Eichenlaub. der auf das Vorhan• zeitig beförderte der FUhrer General der Ar• Nr. 4. Im Jahre 1931 wurde er als Oberst zum densein oder das be• tillerie Heltz, den 'Kommandierenden General Kommandanten von Königsberg in Pr.
    [Show full text]
  • Higher Headquarters – Ghq Units — Static Units (1.09.1939) the German World War Ii Organizational Series
    GERMAN WORLD WAR II ORGANIZATIONAL SERIES Volume 1/III HIGHER HEADQUARTERS – GHQ UNITS — STATIC UNITS (1.09.1939) THE GERMAN WORLD WAR II ORGANIZATIONAL SERIES 1/I 01.09.39 Mechanized Army Formations and Waffen-SS Formations (3rd Revised Edition) 1/II-1 01.09.39 1st and 2nd Welle Army Infantry Divisions 1/II-2 01.09.39 3rd and 4th Welle Army Infantry Divisions 1/III 01.09.39 Higher Headquarters — Mechanized GHQ Units — Static Units (2nd Revised Edition) 2/I 10.05.40 Mechanized Army Formations and Waffen-SS Formations (2nd Revised Edition) 2/II 10.05.40 Higher Headquarters and Mechanized GHQ Units (2nd Revised Edition) 3/I 22.06.41 Mechanized Army Divisions - (2nd Revised Edition) 3/II 22.06.41 Higher Headquarters and Mechanized GHQ Units (2nd Revised Edition) 4/I 28.06.42 Mechanized Army Divisions - (2nd Revised Edition) 4/II 28.06.42 Mechanized GHQ Units and Waffen-SS Formations 5/I 04.07.43 Mechanized Army Formations 5/II 04.07.43 Higher Headquarters and Mechanized GHQ Units 5/III 04.07.43 Waffen-SS Higher Headquarters and Mechanized Formations IN PREPARATION FOR PUBLICATION 2007/2008 7/I 06.06.44 Mechanized Army Formations 2/III 10.05.40 Army Infantry Divisions 3/III 22.06.41 Army Infantry Divisions IN PREPARATION FOR PUBLICATION 01.09.39 Landwehr Division — Mountain Divisions — Cavalry Brigade 10.05.40 Non-Mechanized GHQ Units Static Units 22.06.41 Mechanized Waffen-SS Formations Static Units 28.06.42 Higher Headquarters Army Divisions Static Units 04.07.43 Army Divisions Static Units 01.11.43 Mechanized Army Formations Mechanized GHQ Units Mechanized Waffen-SS Formations Army Divisions Static Units Higher Headquarters 06.06.44 Mechanized GHQ Units Mechanized Waffen-SS Formations Army Divisions Static Units Higher Headquarters 16.12.44 Mechanized Army Formations Mechanized GHQ Units Mechanized Waffen-SS Formations Army Divisions Static Units Higher Headquarters 1939 – 45 Luftwaffen Ground Combat Forces 1944 – 45 The 1944 Brigades 1939 – 45 Organizational Handbook GERMAN WORLD WAR II ORGANIZATIONAL SERIES by Leo W.G.
    [Show full text]