Prussian Apocalypse: the Fall of Danzig 1945 Free Ebook

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Prussian Apocalypse: the Fall of Danzig 1945 Free Ebook FREEPRUSSIAN APOCALYPSE: THE FALL OF DANZIG 1945 EBOOK Egbert Kieser,Tony Le Tissier | 256 pages | 19 Jul 2012 | Pen & Sword Books Ltd | 9781848846746 | English | South Yorkshire, United Kingdom Prussian Apocalypse: The Fall of Danzig, - Egbert Kieser - Google книги Harrowing collection of first-hand accounts of the conquest of Prussia and Danzig by Russian forces in the winter and spring ofas related largely by civilians though the boundary between Prussian Apocalypse : The Fall of Danzig, Egbert Kieser. Egbert Kiesers graphic account of the Red Armys assault on East Prussia in is one of the classic histories of the destruction of Hitlers Germany, and it has never before been available in English. Using extensive, firsthand, unforgettable eyewitness testimony, he documents in riveting detail the catastrophe that overtook German civilians and soldiers as they fled from the Soviet onslaught and their world collapsed around them. Tony Le Tissier, in this fluent and vivid translation of the original German text, brings to bear all his expert knowledge of the military defeat of the German armies in the East and the enormity of the human disaster that went Prussian Apocalypse: The Fall of Danzig 1945 it. Egbert Kieser was born in in Bad Salzungen, Thringen and studied philosophy and the history of art at Heidelberg University. He worked as a freelance journalist, writer and editor. The Eastern Front. Precipitate Flight. The Last Trains. The Fall of Elbing. The German 4th Armys Breakout. Over the Ice of the Frisches Haff. The Sinking of the Wilhelm Gustloff. The Sinking of the General von Steuben. Westwards over the Vistula. From Pillau to Gotenhafen. Chaos at the Mouth of the Vistula. From Hela to Prussian Apocalypse: The Fall of Danzig 1945 West. The Road along the Spit. The Pillau Exit. The Soviet Invasion of the Samland. The Soviets occupy the Samland. The End of Pillau. Title Page Copyright Page Introduction. Danzig cut. Prussian Apocalypse: The Fall Of Danzig : Egbert Kiese | Mercado Libre It was the East Pomeranian Offensive that prevented Zhukov from reaching Berlin in February the object of the massive Vistula—Oder Offensivesince it became a priority to clear German forces from Pomerania first. The 2nd Belorussian Front —under Konstantin Rokossovsky — had initially been tasked with advancing westward north of the Vistula River toward Pomerania Prussian Apocalypse: The Fall of Danzig 1945 the major port city of Danzigwith the primary aim of protecting the right flank of Zhukov's 1st Belorussian FrontPrussian Apocalypse: The Fall of Danzig 1945 was pushing towards Berlin. During the East Prussian Offensivehowever, Rokossovsky was ordered to wheel directly north toward Elbing. As a result, once the initial phase of the East Prussian Offensive was over, the 2nd Belorussian Front was redeployed with the intention of attacking westwards into Pomerania, eliminating the possibility of a German counter-offensive similarly, the parallel Silesian Prussian Apocalypse: The Fall of Danzig 1945 of Konev's 1st Ukrainian Front in the south were in part designed to protect the 1st Belorussian Front's left flank. The need to secure the flanks delayed the Soviets' final push towards Berlinwhich was originally planned for February, until April. Joseph Stalin 's decision to delay the push toward Berlin from February to April has been a subject of some controversy among both the Soviet generals and military historians, with one side arguing that the Soviets had a chance of securing Berlin much quicker and with much lower losses in February, and the other arguing that the danger of leaving large German formations on the flanks could have resulted in a successful German counter-attack and prolonged the war further: the Germans did in fact mount a surprise counter-attack in Pomerania in mid-February, Operation Solstice. The delay did, however, allow the Soviets to occupy significant parts of Austria in the Vienna Offensive. As early as 13 February, German intelligence services had deduced that the Soviets would seek to clear Pomerania before advancing on Berlin. The 2nd Army —defending a large and exposed sector running through Pomerania eastward toward the edge of East Prussia at Elbing — sought permission to withdraw, but this was denied by Adolf Hitler. The corps of the Second Army were seriously understrength by this time, being composed largely of fragmentary or ad hoc units. Zhukov's right wing—a grouping of the 3rd Shock Army and 1st and 2nd Guards Tank Armies—went over to the offensive on 1 March, striking northward with the main force concentrated at Reetz. The entire left wing of 3rd Panzer Prussian Apocalypse: The Fall of Danzig 1945 was cut off by their breakthrough, after Guderian refused Raus' request for withdrawal; the right flank withdrew towards Stettin. On 4 March, forward Soviet tank units reached the Balticand the German forces in Pomerania were trapped in a series of encirclements. Rokossovsky opened the second phase of his offensive on March Prussian Apocalypse: The Fall of Danzig 1945. The 2nd Shock Army threatened to cut off Prussian Apocalypse: The Fall of Danzig 1945 defending forces in the fortress of Marienburgwhich was evacuated two days later, while in the east Elbing finally fell on 10 March. The defence of Marienburg was conducted by a Kampfgruppe under the nominal control of the staff of the 7th Infantry Divisionincluding marine, SS and other units. The troops of the German 2nd Army withdrew in disarray into Danzig and Gdingenwhere the 2nd Belorussian Front besieged them. Zhukov's forces meanwhile, cleared the remainder of 3rd Panzer Army from the east bank of the lower Oderdriving the Germans from their last positions in a bridgehead at Altdamm. Many civilian refugees from Pomerania had fled into the coastal town of Kolbergwhich was surrounded by 4 March. Nevertheless, the town was successfully defended until 18 March, by which time evacuation was almost complete. The Danzig - Gotenhafen Gdingen Fortified Area—also the main port for refugees from East Prussia escaping to the west—was ordered to be defended for as long as possible by von Saucken in order to keep the evacuation routes open. Rokossovsky opened his final offensive on 15 March ; the main thrust, toward the coast at Zoppot between Gdingen and Danzig, being undertaken by the 70th and 49th Army advancing in parallel. By 22 Marchthe 70th Army reached the sea, splitting the German defence. Danzig finally fell on 30 Marchafter which the remnants of the 2nd Army withdrew to the Vistula delta southeast of the city. Evacuation of civilians and military personnel from there and from the Hel Peninsula continued until 10 May According to Soviet claims, in the Battle of Danzig the Germans lost 39, soldiers dead and 10, captured. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. PomeraniaDanzig-West Prussia inside Germany. Eastern Front. Poland and Eastern Germany — Main article: Battle of Kolberg Mary's Church Archdiocese Bishop St. Namespaces Article Talk. Views Read Edit View history. Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file. Download as PDF Printable version. Wikimedia Commons. Date 24 February — 4 April Soviet Union Poland. Konstantin Rokossovsky 2nd Belorussian Front. Wikimedia Commons has media related to East Pomeranian Offensive. Walter Heitz - Wikipedia Inhe became the president of the Reich Military Court. The 6th Army was encircled within the city after Operation Uranusthe Soviet counter- offensive in Stalingrad, and eventually destroyed. Heitz surrendered the central pocket of German forces in Stalingrad on 31 January and died as a prisoner of war in the Soviet Union. Commissioned as a second lieutenant, he became battalion adjutant in and was promoted Prussian Apocalypse: The Fall of Danzig 1945 captain in He remained with his regiment during World War I, where he became Prussian Apocalypse: The Fall of Danzig 1945 battery commander and battalion commander, and fought in East Prussiaon the Russian Front —and on the Western Front from the fall of until the end of the war. Selected for the reduced Reichswehrhe served on the staff of the Artillery School Prussian Apocalypse: The Fall of Danzig 1945 Jueterbog — and in the Artillery Inspectorate in the Defense Ministry — Heitz eventually became the commander of Fortress Koenigsberg in late and achieved the rank of Colonel. Described by historian Samuel W. Mitcham as a "harsh, right-wing career officer", [1] Heitz was a staunch supporter of Nazism and Hitler. On 17 Augustduring Heitz's appointment as president of the ReichskriegsgerichtWehrkraftzersetzung undermining military force was established as a sedition offence in German military lawwhich criminalized all criticism, dissent and behavior opposed to Nazi political and military leadership, particularly within the Wehrmacht's military justice. The Wehrkraftzersetzung consolidated and redefined paragraphs already in the military penal code to punish "seditious" acts such as conscientious objectiondefeatist statementsself-mutilationand questioning the Endsieg. Convictions were punishable by the death penaltyheavy sentences in military prisonsconcentration campsand forced mobilization in combat or penal units. At the outbreak of the Second World War inHeitz was already 60 years old and would have gone into retirement. Nevertheless, he requested to be sent into the frontlines. On September 14,during the invasion of Poland Heitz was appointed as the commander of the armed forces in Danzig- West Prussiapartially because of his hatred for the Poles. He led the Corps in the Invasion of France and on Prussian Apocalypse: The Fall of Danzig 1945 September he was awarded the Knight's Cross of the Iron Cross for personally scouting for river crossings and leading his troops across the Oise river under enemy fire. On 19 November the Soviet forces launched Operation Uranusa massive counteroffensive that involved over 1 million Soviet military personnel, aimed against Hungarian and Romanian units defending the 6th Army's flanks.
Recommended publications
  • The Oder-Neisse Line As Poland's Western Border
    Piotr Eberhardt Piotr Eberhardt 2015 88 1 77 http://dx.doi.org/10.7163/ GPol.0007 April 2014 September 2014 Geographia Polonica 2015, Volume 88, Issue 1, pp. 77-105 http://dx.doi.org/10.7163/GPol.0007 INSTITUTE OF GEOGRAPHY AND SPATIAL ORGANIZATION POLISH ACADEMY OF SCIENCES www.igipz.pan.pl www.geographiapolonica.pl THE ODER-NEISSE LINE AS POLAND’S WESTERN BORDER: AS POSTULATED AND MADE A REALITY Piotr Eberhardt Institute of Geography and Spatial Organization Polish Academy of Sciences Twarda 51/55, 00-818 Warsaw: Poland e-mail: [email protected] Abstract This article presents the historical and political conditioning leading to the establishment of the contemporary Polish-German border along the ‘Oder-Neisse Line’ (formed by the rivers known in Poland as the Odra and Nysa Łużycka). It is recalled how – at the moment a Polish state first came into being in the 10th century – its western border also followed a course more or less coinciding with these same two rivers. In subsequent cen- turies, the political limits of the Polish and German spheres of influence shifted markedly to the east. However, as a result of the drastic reverse suffered by Nazi Germany, the western border of Poland was re-set at the Oder-Neisse Line. Consideration is given to both the causes and consequences of this far-reaching geopolitical decision taken at the Potsdam Conference by the victorious Three Powers of the USSR, UK and USA. Key words Oder-Neisse Line • western border of Poland • Potsdam Conference • international boundaries Introduction districts – one for each successor – brought the loss, at first periodically and then irrevo- At the end of the 10th century, the Western cably, of the whole of Silesia and of Western border of Poland coincided approximately Pomerania.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Azerbaijan in the Victory Over Fascism
    A-PDFProperty Split DEMO of : Purchasehistory from www.A-PDF.com to remove the watermark Zumrud HASANOVA The Role of Azerbaijan in the Victory over Fascism THis Year HUMANitY is celeBratiNG THat it is 65 Years siNce THE END of THE SecoND World War, KNowN IN THE forMer Soviet UNioN as THE Great Patriotic War. THE FUrtHer froM OUR tiME THE UNforGettaBle date 9 MaY 1945 is reMoved THE GraNder THE GIGANtic feat of THE victors over fascisM appears to MANkiND. 28 www.irs-az.com 1 2 3 4 1. Hazi Aslanov – Guard commander, major general, twice Hero of the Soviet Union; 2. Israfil Mammadov – lieutenant, the first Azerbaijani Hero of the Soviet Union;3. Mehti Huseynzade – intelligence agent, partisan, Hero of the Soviet Union; 4. Ziya Buniyadov – historian, academician, participant of the Great Patriotic War, Hero of the Soviet Union. howing model valour in bat- and the Kursk Bulge, defended the in the war against fascism. tle and also persistent selfless Caucasus and liberated the Ukraine, More than 130 types of arms Slabour on the home front, the Russia, Belarus, the Baltic, Moldova and ammunitions were made then Azerbaijani people contributed sub- and the countries of Eastern Europe. in Azerbaijan, including missiles for stantially towards the general vic- Among the participants in the the famous Katyusha. Our compatri- tory. Together with tens of millions battles for Berlin were daughters ots donated 15kg of gold, 952kg of of sons and daughters of the other of Azerbaijan - R. Ahmadova, S. silver, 320 million roubles and also people of the USSR they forged this Bayramova and S.
    [Show full text]
  • Die Fritsch-Krise Im Frühjahr 1938. Neun Dokumente Aus Dem Nachlaß Des Generalobersten
    Dokumentation Horst Mühleisen Die Fritsch-Krise im Frühjahr 1938. Neun Dokumente aus dem Nachlaß des Generalobersten I. Die Bedeutung der Dokumente Es gibt Skandale, die lange fortwirken und auch die Forschung immer noch be- schäftigen. Zu diesen gehört jener, der mit dem Namen des Generalfeldmarschalls Werner von Blomberg, des Reichskriegsministers und Oberbefehlshabers der Wehr- macht, sowie des Generalobersten Werner Freiherrn von Fritsch, des Oberbefehls- habers des Heeres, verbunden ist. Der Anlaß für Blombergs Entlassung am 4. Februar 1938 war seine Heirat mit einer Frau, deren Vorleben als kompromittiert galt. Fritsch aber war der Homose- xualität, des Vergehens nach § 175 Strafgesetzbuch, beschuldigt worden. Auch er erhielt am selben Tage, dem 4. Februar, seinen Abschied. Um die gegen Fritsch er- hobenen Vorwürfe aufzuklären, ermittelte sowohl die Geheime Staatspolizei als auch das Reichskriegsgericht. Dies waren die Tatsachen, die im Frühjahr 1938 indessen nur wenigen Perso- nen verlaßlich bekannt waren. Der Öffentlichkeit war mitgeteilt worden, die Ver- abschiedung von Blomberg und Fritsch sei aus gesundheitlichen Gründen erfolgt. Wenige Jahre nach Kriegsende, 1949, veröffentlichte Johann Adolf Graf Kiel- mansegg, Fritschs Neffe, eine Darstellung über den Prozeß des Reichskriegsge- richts gegen den Generalobersten1. Die persönlichen Zeugnisse, die der ehemali- ge Oberbefehlshaber des Heeres hinterlassen hat, waren indessen spärlich, da Fritsch keine umfangreiche Korrespondenz führte. Ferner standen Kielmansegg die Prozeßakten nicht zur Verfügung, da sie verbrannt waren. Fotokopien der Ak- ten und Verhandlungsstenogramme, die in nicht sehr zahlreicher Ausfertigung vorlagen, ebenso wie die Handakten des Verteidigers, des Grafen Rüdiger von der Goltz, wurden durch Bombenangriffe vernichtet2. Ob die Protokolle, die Reichs- kriegsgerichtsrat Dr. Karl Sack während des Prozesses führte, tatsächlich nach Kriegsende in die Hände der amerikanischen Besatzungsmacht gefallen sind3, ist ungewiß; bis heute sind sie nicht wieder aufgetaucht.
    [Show full text]
  • African Americans in WWII
    RESOURCES IN THE DWIGHT D. EISENHOWER LIBRARY RELATING TO AFRICAN-AMERICANS EXPERIENCES IN WORLD WAR II AURAND, HENRY S.: Commanding General, 6th Service Command, 1942-1944; Commanding Officer, Normandy Base Section, 1944-1945; Commanding General, Services of Supply, China Theater, 1945; Commanding General, 6th Service Command, 1946; Commanding General, U.S. Army, Pacific Theater, 1949-1952: Papers, 1873-1967 Box 11: Diary Sept. 8, 1942 – Oct. 29, 1944. Dates for meetings with Truman Gibson, Jr. on following dates, September 28, 1944, September 5, 1944 (Representatives of Colored Press and T.K. Gibson, Jr), August 21, 1944, July 24, 1944, Col. Potter Campbell to confer re hotel for returned Negro soldiers; July 12 preview of film “The Negro Soldier,” February 21 T.K Gibson and showing of film “The Negro Soldier;” December 10, 1943 T.K. Gibson, Jr. Box 13: Personal Correspondence, 1944 D-H. Letter from Truman, Gibson, Jr. to General Aurand re March 6 showing of film “The Negro Soldier” and mention of visit of Brigadier General B.O. Davis. Box 14: Commanding General’s Staff Conferences (1). Remarks of CG at Staff Conference March 6, 1944, last paragraph contains reference to General Aurand’s favorable impression of film “The Negro Soldier.” Box 14: Remarks of CG at his Staff Conference in the Civic Theater 5/10/1943. General Aurand’s statements to effect that “I and all people must be color blind. We must not in any way differentiate between the pigmented races and the White races.” Box 21: History of Normandy Base Section. Box 21: History of Provost Marshall Section Normandy Base Section, Oct 1, 1944-May 9, 1945.
    [Show full text]
  • 93Rd Annual Conference of the ILO Concludes Its Work
    ISSN 1811-1351 №# 1 2 (20) (21) МАРТ JUNE 2005 93rd annual Conference of the ILO concludes its work On June 16 Conference of the International The Conference marked the fourth World The Committee on the Application of Stan- Labour Organization concluded its 93rd annual Day Against Child Labour by calling for the dards noted with respect to freedom of associa- session. The annual Conference of the ILO drew elimination of child labour in one of the world’s tion in Belarus that no real concrete and tangible more than 3,000 delegates, including heads of most dangerous sectors – small-scale mining and measures had been taken by the Government to State, labour ministers and leaders of workers’ quarrying – within five to 10 years. comply with the recommendations of the ILO and employers’ organizations from most of the Confronted with record levels of youth un- Commission of Inquiry. As details of a govern- ILO’s 178 member states. employment in recent years, delegates from ment Plan of Action on freedom of association They discussed the need for urgently elimi- more than 100 countries discussed pathways to were not known yet, the Committee urged that nating forced labour, creating jobs for youth, decent work for youth and the role of the inter- an ILO mission be sent to Belarus, to assist the improving safety at work and tackling what ILO national community in advancing the youth government and also to evaluate the measures Director-General Juan Somavia called a “global employment agenda. The Committee also en- that the government has taken to comply with jobs crisis”.
    [Show full text]
  • Bundesvereinigung Opfer Der NS-Militärjustiz“ Möglich
    Die vorliegende Arbeit wurde in dieser Form nur durch die Mitarbeit der „Bundesvereinigung Opfer der NS-Militärjustiz“ möglich. Mein besonderer Dank gilt den Herren Baumann und Theilmann sowie allen befragten Personen, die sich die Zeit genommen haben, auf meine Fragen zu antworten. 1 Einleitung und Forschungsstand Am 29.11.1995 veranstaltete der Deutsche Bundestag eine Anhörung zum Thema Entschädigungszahlungen an die Opfer der NS-Militärjustiz. Nachdem der ehemalige Wehrmachtrichter Ottfried Keller der Wehrmachtjustiz „ohne Zweifel“ rechtsstaat- lichen Charakter zugebilligt hatte und darüber hinaus angab, die Verfahren seien für die Angeklagten „segensreich“ gewe- sen, kam es zu einem Eklat. Die bündnisgrüne Abgeordnete Christa Nickels bezichtigte Keller, er „rechtfertige Nazi-Urteile“, worauf ihr der rechtspolitische Sprecher der Unionsfraktion, Norbert Geis, vorwarf, „sie ertrage die Wahrheit nicht“.1 Was aber ist die Wahrheit? Welche Motive trieben zehntau- sende Soldaten zur Fahnenflucht?2 Mit welchen Folgen hatten sie zu rechnen, wenn sie gefaßt wurden, und auf welcher Grundlage fällten die Richter der Wehrmacht ihre Urteile? In- wieweit war die Wehrmachtjustiz Teil des nationalsozialistischen Unrechtsstaates? Diese Fragen gaben den Anstoß für die fol- gende Arbeit. Dabei soll keineswegs ein zweites Urteil über die überlebenden Deserteure gefällt werden.3 Vielmehr geht es darum, Einsichten in die Hintergründe des militärischen Unge- horsams zu gewinnen. Theo Schulte hat es treffend formuliert: 1 Frankfurter Rundschau, 30.11.1995, S. 1. 2 Zum Ausmaß der Desertionen im 2. Weltkrieg siehe Punkt 2.1 dieser Arbeit. Im Folgenden werden die Begriffe Fahnenflucht und Desertion synonym verwendet. 3 Dies ist der Ansatz der Bundesregierung, die auf einer Einzelfallprüfung besteht, weil es auch Richter gegeben habe, die „sich um ein unab- hängiges Urteil bemüht haben“.
    [Show full text]
  • Order of Battle, Mid-September 1940 Army Group a Commander-In-Chief
    Operation “Seelöwe” (Sea Lion) Order of Battle, mid-September 1940 Army Group A Commander-in-Chief: Generalfeldmarschall Gerd von Rundstedt Chief of the General Staff: General der Infanterie Georg von Sodenstern Operations Officer (Ia): Oberst Günther Blumentritt 16th Army Commander-in-Chief: Generaloberst Ernst Busch Chief of the General Staff: Generalleutnant Walter Model Operations Officer (Ia): Oberst Hans Boeckh-Behrens Luftwaffe Commander (Koluft) 16th Army: Oberst Dr. med. dent. Walter Gnamm Division Command z.b.V. 454: Charakter als Generalleutnant Rudolf Krantz (This staff served as the 16th Army’s Heimatstab or Home Staff Unit, which managed the assembly and loading of all troops, equipment and supplies; provided command and logistical support for all forces still on the Continent; and the reception and further transport of wounded and prisoners of war as well as damaged equipment. General der Infanterie Albrecht Schubert’s XXIII Army Corps served as the 16th Army’s Befehlsstelle Festland or Mainland Command, which reported to the staff of Generalleutnant Krantz. The corps maintained traffic control units and loading staffs at Calais, Dunkirk, Ostend, Antwerp and Rotterdam.) FIRST WAVE XIII Army Corps: General der Panzertruppe Heinric h-Gottfried von Vietinghoff genannt Scheel (First-wave landings on English coast between Folkestone and New Romney) – Luftwaffe II./Flak-Regiment 14 attached to corps • 17th Infantry Division: Generalleutnant Herbert Loch • 35th Infantry Division: Generalleutnant Hans Wolfgang Reinhard VII Army
    [Show full text]
  • 1940 Commandés À Plusieurs Chantiers Navals Néerlandais, Seuls Quatre Exemplaires (T-61 À T-64) Doivent Être Poursuivis, Les Autres Seront Annulés
    Appendice 1 Ordre de bataille de l’Armée Rouge sur le front au 1er juin 1943 (forces principales) (pour les deux Fronts Baltes – les indications pour les autres Fronts ne sont entièrement valables qu’à partir du 1er juillet) 1er Front de la Baltique (M.M. Popov) Du sud de Parnu (Estonie) au sud de Võru (Estonie). – 1ère Armée (A.V. Kourkine) – 4e Armée (N.I. Gusev) – 7e Armée (A.N. Krutikov) – 42e Armée (V.I. Morozov) – 12e Corps Blindé (V.V. Butkov) – 15e Corps Blindé (F.N. Rudkin) Aviation subordonnée : 13e Armée Aérienne (S.D. Rybalchenko) 2e Front de la Baltique (K.A. Meretskov) Du sud de Pskov (Russie) au nord de Vitebsk (Biélorussie). – 27e Armée (N.E. Berzarine) – 34e Armée (A.I. Lopatine) – 39e Armée (A.I. Zigin) – 55e Armée (V.P. Smiridov) – 13e Corps Blindé (B.S. Bakharov) – 14e Corps Blindé (I.F. Kirichenko) – 101e Brigade Blindée lourde Aviation subordonnée : 14e Armée Aérienne (I.P. Zhuravlev) 1er Front de Biélorussie (A.I. Eremenko) De Vitebsk (Biélorussie) à Orsha (Biélorussie) – 20e Armée (P.A. Kourouchkine) – 1ère Armée de la Garde (I.M. Chistiakov) – 3e Armée de la Garde (I.G. Zakharkine) – 63e Armée (V.I. Kuznetsov) – 18e Corps Blindé (A.S. Burdeiny) Aviation subordonnée : 2e Armée Aérienne (N.F. Naumenko) 2e Front de Biélorussie (I.S. Koniev) D’Orsha (Biélorussie) à Gomel (Biélorussie). – 2e Armée de la Garde (L.A. Govorov) – 29e Armée (I.M. Managrov) – 15e Armée (I.I. Fediouninski) – 54e Armée (S.V. Roginski) – 3e Armée de Choc (M.A. Purkayev) – 7e Corps Blindé (A.G.
    [Show full text]
  • “Zersetzung Und Zivilcourage“
    EXPOSEE In dieser Dissertation geht es um die Rolle von Frauen im Alltag des Nationalsozialismus und Krieges von 1939-1945. Nicht nur, dass Frauen selbstständig den Arbeits- und Kriegsallta g meisterten, sie mussten auch Ängste, Gefahren und Terror überstehen. Als dann besonders in den letzten Kriegsjahre n immer mehr Frauen einen deutlichen Unmut über die verheerende Situatio n öffentlich zum Ausdruck brachten oder gar flüchtigen Soldaten Beihilfe zur Fahnenfluc ht leisteten, wurde dieses „wehrkraftzersetzende Verhalten“ gesetzlich und richterlich verfolgt und schwer bestraft. Die zentrale Fragestellung dieser Arbeit richtet sich insbesondere auf die Praxen “ZERSETZUNG der Überlebenssicherung ausgewählter Geschichten von Frauen in verschiedenste n Momenten der Verfolgung. Die historische UND Auseinandersetzung mit „eigensinnigen“ Frauen als Akteurinne n im Krieg, soll zu weite r e n gesellschaftlichen Diskursen über ZIVILCOURAGE“ Geschlechterdifferenzen im Krieg, bestehenden Urteilen der NS- Justiz und bislang unbeachtet „Die Verfolgung des Unmuts von Frauen gebliebene Verfolgten und Verfolgern beitragen. im nationalsozialistischen Deutschland Maren Büttner während des Krieges 1939 - 1945.“ Universität Erfurt „Zersetzung und Zivilcourage“ Die Verfolgung des Unmuts von Frauen im nationalsozialistischen Deutschland während des Krieges 1939 – 1945. zur Erlangung eines Grades einer Doktorin der Philosophie -Dr. phil.- Philosophische Fakultät Maren Büttner Dekan: Prof. Dr. Guido Löhrer Gutachter: 1. Prof. Dr. Alf Lüdtke, Universität Erfurt 2. Prof. Dr. Sabine Schmolinsky, Universität Erfurt 3. Prof. Dr. Elisabeth Klaus, Universität Salzburg eingereicht: 25. März 2011 Datum der Promotion: 18. Oktober 2011 URN der Dissertation: urn:nbn:de:gbv:547-201400549 Alle Tage Der Krieg wird nicht mehr erklärt, sondern fortgesetzt. Das Unerhörte ist alltäglich geworden. Der Held bleibt den Kämpfen fern.
    [Show full text]
  • Operation Sealion: 24 September, 1940
    OPERATION SEALION: 24 SEPTEMBER, 1940. STRATEGIC OVERVIEW Herr Hitler has decided, in light of the illogical Britischer refusal to come to peace terms, to proceed with the invasion of England. Generalfeldmarschall Gerd von Runstedt has been appointed as Commander-in-Chief (CIC) of Heeresgruppe A , which is to land on the south-east coast of England, establish a bridgehead, capture at least two workable ports and airfields, eliminate all military opposition, and advance as far as the Second Operational Objective shown on the map below. The Luftwaffe and Kriegsmarine will lend their support to the Army’s efforts… STRATEGIC MAP This is the overall picture of the general invasion area of Heeresgruppe A , consisting of 9 Armee & 16 Armee : In addition, you will be given more detailed maps (Ordnance Survey (OS) Series, 1 square = 1 kilometre) which are used to plan your deployments and attacks in more detail. ORDER OF BATTLE (see separate sheet for detailed orbats – all army units are elite , some are fanatics ): • 16.Armee — Generaloberst Ernst Busch (Demarcation Area East = Folkestone to Hastings) First Wave • XIII.Armee-Korps — General Heinrich-Gottfried von VietinghoffgenanntScheel . o 17.Infanterie-Division o 35.Infanterie-Division o Luftwaffe II./Flak-Regiment 14 • VII.Armee-Korps — Generaloberst Eugen Ritter von Schobert o 1.Gebirgs-Division o 7.Infanterie-Division o Luftwaffe I./Flak-Regiment 26 • Independent tank units: o Amphibious Tank Battalion A o Amphibious Tank Battalion B o Tank Detachment 100 (3 flammpanzer companies) o 4 StugIII panzerjaeger batteries o 4 Panzerjaeger I AT companies (1 per Division) o 1st Battalion Bau-Lehr-Regiment z.b.V.
    [Show full text]
  • With a Focus on Developing Culture Tourism
    Dr. Armin Mikos von Rohrscheit Armin Mikos v. Rohrscheidt Poland – the biggest „open air museum of fortresses” with a focus on developing culture tourism The dynamic development of culture tourism in historic and former military fortifications, that has taken place in Europe over the past decades, has affected Poland very little. Despite the fact, that Poland has a lot to offer especially in this field for tourism development. The potential benefits for tourism could make Poland an even more attractive tourist destination in culture tourism in the global scale through marketing formerly unknown destinations for tourists. As a result, there will be enormous economic benefits for those regions, where there has not been a lot of investment to the present, and where unemployment rates are more than the average in Poland. The following contribution wants to deal with the following tasks: • To give an overview of military architecture in Poland, with regard to historic background • To give an overview of the state of renovation and restoration as well as their significance for tourism • To disclosure the necessary steps in marketing and promotion for developing tourism • To propose a tourism route for the country as a whole with the topic „architectura militaris“ 1 The past centuries in polish history as a factor for expanding fortifications 1.1 16th to 18th century Era of classic fortification building, the time of the huge territorial Polish-Lithuanian Empire. At the same time it was a period of long and frequent warfare in the Southeast, the East and the Northeast and the time of the conflicts with the Muscovite state, the Ottoman Empire, the Tartars and with Swe- den between 1626 and 1660.
    [Show full text]
  • War Memory Under the Leonid Brezhnev Regime 1965-1974
    1 No One is Forgotten, Nothing is Forgotten: War Memory Under the Leonid Brezhnev Regime 1965-1974 By Yevgeniy Zilberman Adviser: Professor David S. Foglesong An Honors Thesis Submitted To The History Department of Rutgers University School of Arts and Sciences New Brunswick, NJ April, 2012 2 Table of Contents Acknowledgements Pg. 3 Introduction Pg. 5 1964-1967: Building the Cult Pg. 18 a) Forming the Narrative: Building the Plot and Effacing the Details Pg. 21 b) Consecrating the War: Ritual, Monument and Speech Pg. 24 c) Iconography at Work: Soviet War Poster Pg. 34 d) Digitizing the War: On the Cinema Front Pg. 44 1968-1970: Fascism Revived and the Battle for Peace Pg. 53 a) This Changes Everything: Czechoslovakia and its Significance Pg. 55 b) Anti-Fascism: Revanchism and Fear Pg. 59 c) Reviving Peace: The Peace Cult Pg. 71 1970-1974: Realizing Peace Pg. 83 a) Rehabilitating Germany Pg. 85 b) Cinema: Germany and the Second World War on the Film Screen Pg. 88 c) Developing Ostpolitik: War memory and the Foundations for Peace Pg. 95 d) Embracing Peace Pg. 102 Conclusion: Believing the War Cult Pg. 108 Bibliography Pg. 112 3 Acknowledgements Perhaps as a testament to my naivety, when I embarked upon my journey toward writing an honors thesis, I envisioned a leisurely and idyllic trek toward my objective. Instead, I found myself on a road mired with multiple peaks and valleys. The obstacles and impediments were plentiful and my limitations were numerous. Looking back now upon the path I traveled, I realize that I could not have accomplished anything without the assistance of a choice collection of individuals.
    [Show full text]