DOCSLIB.ORG

Signaling and Train Control

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Signaling and Train Control VOLUME 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS APPENDIX B .LONG-TERM SAFETY NEEDS AND RELATED PROJECTS INTRODUCTION ............................................ B- 1 PREVIOUS SAFETY HISTORY ..................................B-1 OPERATING CONDITIONS ....................................B-2 OPERATIONAL SAFETY NEEDS AND RELATED PROJECTS ........... B-2 NORTHEAST CORRTDOR SAFETY COMMITTEE .................... B-6 ISSUES NOT DIRECTLY ADDRESSED IN THE MASTER PLAN ......... B-6 HIGH-SPEED RAIL SAFETY RESEARCH ..........................B-7 APPENDIX C .DESCRIPTION OF INDIVIDUAL PROJECTS HIGH-SPEED REQUIREMENTS .................................C-2 TRIPTIME ................................................ C-2 CAPACITY ...............................................C-19 RECAPITALIZATION ........................................C-32 OTHER ..................................................C-41 APPENDIX D .OWNERSHIP AND OPERATING RIGHTS INTRODUCTION ......................... ...................D-1 SUMMARY OF OWNERSHIP AND OPERATING RIGHTS .............. D- 1 PENN STATION TO SHELL INTERLOCKTNG .......................D-2 SHELL INTERLOCKING TO NEW HAVEN ........................D-3 NEW HAVEN TO RHODE ISLAND/MASSACHUSETTS STATE LINE ..... D-5 RHODE ISLAND/MASSACHUSETTS STATE LINE TO BOSTON ......... D-9 APPENDIX E .GEOGRAPHIC SUMMARY OF PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS HIGH SPEED REQUIREMENTS .................................. 1 TRIPTIME ................................................. 1 CAPACITY ................................................. 11 RECAPITALIZATION ..........................................19 OTHER IMPROVEMENTS ......................................26 APPENDIX F .TRACK CONFIGURATION CHARTS APPENDIX G .SCHEDULE OF PROPOSED PROJECTS INTRODUCTION ........................................G-1 METHODOLOGY ............................................G- 1 CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE ..................................G-3 SCHEDULE OF PROJECTS ....................................G-4 MILESTONE REQUIREMENTS ................................. G-4 PROGRAMS NOT YET DEFINED AND ESTIMATED ................ G-20 Table of Contents (Cont'd) APPENDIX H .TIMETABLES OF NEC CARRIERS 2010 AMTRAK SCHEDULE ........................................ 20 10 MBTA OPERATIONS PHILOSOPHY ............................. 20 10 RIDOT KINGSTON-PROVIDENCE SERVICE ...................... 2010 CDOT SLE SERVICE ........................................ 2010 NEW HAVEN LINE SERVICE ................................. APPENDIX I-INTERLOCKING AND CURVE DOCUMENTATION INTRODUCTION .............................................I- 1 INTERLOCKINGS ............................................1-1 CURVES ...................................................1-6 CURVE ANALYSIS NEW YORK CITY TO NEW HAVEN ............... 1-6 SPEED ANALYSIS OF CURVES AND CIVIL IMPACTS ............... 1-10 CURVE ANALYSIS NEW HAVEN TO BOSTON . ; ................... 1-27 SIGNAL SYSTEM IMPACT, INCREASED MAXIMUM AUTHORIZED SPEEDS+TEW ROCHELLE TO NEW HAVEN .......................1-29 INTRODUCTION ........................................... 1-30 DESCRIPTION OF INFORMATION USED IN EXAMINATION .......... 1-31 SAFE BRAKING CALCLTLATION DESCRIPTION ................... 1-32 CONTROL LINE DIAGRAM DESCRIPTION ....................... 1-33 ANALYSIS OF IMPACT AND FORMULATION OF MODIFICATIONS .... 1-33 COST ESTIMATE .......................................... 1-34 REVISION DESCRIPTION ................................... 1-36 INTRODUCTION ADDENDUM 1 .............................. 1-37 SUMMARY-ADDENDUM1 .................................. 1-38 DESCRIPTION OF INFORMATION SUPPLIED WITH ADDENDUM 1 ... 1-39 REVISION DESCRIPTION FOR NEW HAVEN LINE BRAKING CHARACTERISTICS ........................................ 1-39 APPENDIX J-AMTRAK'S COMMENTS ON THE TRANSPORTATION PLAN APPENDIX K-EVALUATION OF NEW HAVEN LINE'S POWER SYSTEM INTRODUCTION ........................................K- 1 METHODOLOGY ............................................K- 1 FINDINGS .................................................K-2 RECOMMENDATIONS ........................................K-4 APPENDIX GOPERATIONS ANALYSIS TO SUPPORT PROJECT GOALS INTRODUCTION ........................................... L-1 ABILITY TO MEET PROJECT GOALS ........................... L-1 2010 TRAFFIC LEVEL OPERATIONS ............................ L-23 TRIPTIMEFINDINGS .......................................L-26 . CONCLUSIONS ............................................ L-43 APPENDIX M-OPERATIONS ANALYSIS TO SUPPORT CONSTRUCTION INTRODUCTION ............................................M-1 OPERATING IMPACTS DURMG CONSTRUCTION ..................M-2 PLAN FOR SCHEDULING COORDINATION DURING CONSTRUCTION . M- 11 Table of Contents (Cont'd) APPENDIX N-INTEGRATED SCHEDULING AND DISPATCHING FOR THE NEC MTRODUCTION ............................................ N- 1 CURRENT ARRANGEMENTS ....................................N- 1 ALTERNATIVE FUTURE ARRANGEMENTS ....................... N-3 CONCLUSIONS ............................................ N-6 APPENDIX 0-AMTRAK AUTHORIZATION AND DEVELOPMENT ACT. PUBLIC LAW 102.533. OCTOBER 27. 1992 Tables G-1 COMPARATIVE SIMULATED RUNNING TIMES FOR GOAL TRAMS. With Various Train Consists and Facility Configurations. Showing Effect of Improving Boston-New Haven Section Only ..................................G-9 G-2 COMPARATIVE SIMULATED RUNNING TIMES AND TIME SAVINGS FOR CONVENTIONAL TRAMS. Based upon Present Stop Pattem of #I71 (Typical Stop Pattern). Showing Effect of Improving Boston-New Haven Section Only ..... G-10 G-3 COMPARATIVE SIMULATED RUNNING TIMES AND TIME SAVINGS FOR CONVENTIONAL TRAMS. Based upon Present Stop Pattem of #193. (All Stop Pattern). Showing Effect of Improving Boston-New Haven Section Only ..... G-11 1-1 LISTING OF RECONFIGURED INTERLOCKINGS BY PROJECT ......... 1-2 1-2 ......................................................... 1-4 1-3 SIXTEEN CURVES THAT WILL MEET THE SPEED GOALS AND REQUIRE NO ADJUSTMENTS ............................................ 1-13 1-4 SIXTEEN CURVES THAT WILL MEET THE SPEED GOALS BY ADJUSTTNG E, WITHOUT CHANGING SPIRALS ............................... I- 13 1-5 THIRTEEN CURVES REQUIRING SHIFTS OF ABOUT 6 INCHES TO MEET PROPOSED SPEED GOALS ................................... 1-14 1-6 TWENTY-FOUR CURVES REALIGNED BETWEEN 6 INCHES AND 3 FEET 1-14 1-7 SIX CURVES REQUIRING SHIFTS IN EXCESS OF 3 FEET TO ACHIEVE SPEED GOALS .................................................. 1-15 30-Minute Demands for Feeder Substations ..........................K-5 Two-Hour Demands for Feeder Substations ..........................K-6 One-Minute Demands for Feeder Substations ......................... K-7 30-Minute Demands for Autotransformer Substations .................... K-8 Two-Hour Demands for Autotransformer Substations .................... K-9 One-Minute Demands for Autotransformer Substations ................. K- 10 Autotransformer System Feeder Evaluation .......................... K- 11 OCS Ampacity Check ........................................K-12 Two-Hour Demand Sharing. Autotransformer Substations (High Power) ...... K-13 Two-Hour Demand Sharing. Autotransformer Substations (Low Power) ...... K-14 Two-Hour Demand Sharing. Feeder Substations (High and Low Power) ...... K-15 Table of Contents (Cont'd) Tables (Cont'd) COMPARATIVE SIMULATED RUNNING TIMES FOR GOAL TRAINS, With Various Train Consists and Facility Configurations, Showing Effect of Electrifying Boston-New Haven Section .................................... L-7 COMPARATIVE SIMULATED RUNNING TIMES FOR GOAL TRAINS, With Various Train Consists and Facility Configurations, Showing Effects of Electrifying Boston-New Haven Section, Plus Increasing Curve Superelevation to 6 Inches and Using a Curve Unbalance of 6 Inches ............................. L-10 COMPARATIVE SIMULATED RUNNING TIMES FOR GOAL TRAINS, With Various Train Consists and Facility Configurations, Showing Effects of Electrifying Boston-New Haven Section, Plus Increasing Curve Superelevation to 6 Inches and Using a Curve Unbalance of 8 Inches ............................. L-1 1 COMPARATIVE SIMULATED RUNNING TIMES FOR GOAL TRAINS, With Various Train Consists and Facility Configurations, Showing Effects of Electrifying Boston-New Haven Section, Plus Increasing Curve Superelevation to 6 Inches and Using a Curve Unbalance of 9 Inches ............................. L-14 INCREMENTAL TIME SAVINGS ACHIEVED BY INCREASING UNBALANCED SUPERELEVATION (E,) FROM 6" TO 8" AND 9" ................... L-15 COMPARATIVE SIMULATED RUNNING TIMES FOR GOAL TRAINS, With Various Train Consists and Facility Configurations, Showing Effects of Electrifying Boston-New Haven Section, Plus Increasing Curve Superelevation to 6 Inches, Using a Curve Unbalance of 6 Inches, And Increasing the Number of Stops to Six . L-16 COMPARATIVE SIMULATED RUNNING TIMES AND TIME SAVINGS FOR CONVENTIONAL TRAINS, Based upon Present Stop Pattern of #I71 (Typical Stop Pattern) Showing Effect of Electrifying Boston-New Haven Section ........ L-18 COMPARATIVE SIMULATED RUNNING TIMES AND TIME SAVINGS FOR CONVENTIONAL TRAINS Based upon Present Stop Pattern of #I71 (Typical Stop Pattern) Showing Effect of Electrifying Boston-New Haven Section, Plus Increasing Curve Superelevation to 6 Inches and Using a Curve Unbalance of 5 Inches . L-19 COMPARATIVE SIMULATED RUNNING TIMES AND TIME SAVINGS FOR CONVENTIONAL TRAINS, Based upon Present Stop Pattern of #I93 (All-Stop Pattern), Showing Effect of Electrifying Boston-New Haven Section ........ L-20 COMPARATIVE SIMULATED RUNNING TIMES AND TIME SAVINGS FOR CONVENTIONAL
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2.2 Pointwork Configurations in the Following Paragraphs Some of the More Maintenance Is Straightforward
    Part 2 Section 2 POINTWORK Issued February 2001 2.2 Pointwork configurations In the following paragraphs some of the more maintenance is straightforward. However, in a common pointwork configurations are shown restricted space it may be necessary to together with the accepted terminology used to superimpose one turnout upon another, which describe them. When planning track layouts the introduces additional crossings and timbering and preference is to use a combination of single may, in bullhead track, involve the use of special turnouts as these require the minimum of special chairs. chairs and timbers to construct them and 2.2.1 Single turnouts These follow the pattern described in 2.1 and are illustrated in Figure 2-9. RH Turnout LH Turnout RH Crossover LH Crossover Split or Equilateral Turnout Figure 2-9 Single turnouts 2.2.2 Tandem or double turnout This uses one set of switches immediately after form part of a continuous curve but this would another and before the crossing, which introduces require movements to be carried out at low speed. a third crossing and crowded timbering. Where (Figure 2-10 and Photo 2.2) space is particularly crowded the crossing may Figure 2-10 Tandem turnout 2-2-9 2.2.3 Three-throw turnout Photo 2.2 A double tandem turnout leading off from a double There is a nomenclature problem here slip at Stowmarket Goods Yard. as the 3-throw yields the same outcome (NRM Windwood Collection GE1005) as the double turnout. It uses a left hand and a right hand set of switches that are superimposed to divide three ways together in symmetrical form.
    [Show full text]
  • NYMTC Regional Freight Plan
    3-1 CHAPTER 3: THE THE TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM Photo Source: NYMTC Photo Source: 5. Implementation Guidance 3. Identifying & Assessing Needs 4. Improvements & Solutions 1. Regional Freight Plan Purpose & Desired Freight Outcomes 2. Freight System & Market Overview Regional Freight Plan 2018-2045 Appendix 8 | Regional Freight Plan 2018-2045 Table of Contents 1.0 Regional Freight Plan Purpose and Desired Freight Outcomes ................................................... 1-1 1.1 Plan 2045 Shared Goals and Desired Freight Outcomes ......................................................... 1-2 1.2 Institutional Context ................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.3 Regional Context ....................................................................................................................... 1-2 1.4 Required Federal Performance Measures................................................................................. 1-4 2.0 Freight System and Market Overview .............................................................................................. 2-1 2.1 Freight System Description and Operating Characteristics ....................................................... 2-1 2.1.1 Roadway Network ......................................................................................................... 2-1 2.1.2 Rail Network .................................................................................................................. 2-8 2.1.3 Waterborne Network
    [Show full text]
  • Metro Rail Design Criteria Section 10 Operations
    METRO RAIL DESIGN CRITERIA SECTION 10 OPERATIONS METRO RAIL DESIGN CRITERIA SECTION 10 / OPERATIONS TABLE OF CONTENTS 10.1 INTRODUCTION 1 10.2 DEFINITIONS 1 10.3 OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE PLAN 5 Metro Baseline 10- i Re-baseline: 06/15/10 METRO RAIL DESIGN CRITERIA SECTION 10 / OPERATIONS OPERATIONS 10.1 INTRODUCTION Transit Operations include such activities as scheduling, crew rostering, running and supervision of revenue trains and vehicles, fare collection, system security and system maintenance. This section describes the basic system wide operating and maintenance philosophies and methodologies set forth for the Metro Rail Projects, which shall be used by designer in preparation of an Operations and Maintenance Plan. An initial Operations and Maintenance Plan (OMP) is developed during the environmental phase and is based on ridership forecasts produced during this early planning phase of a project. From this initial Operations and Maintenance plan, headways are established that are to be evaluated by a rail operations simulation upon which design and operating headways can be established to confirm operational goals for light and heavy rail systems. The Operations and Maintenance Plan shall be developed in order to design effective, efficient and responsive transit system. The operations criteria and requirements established herein represent Metro’s Rail Operating Requirements / Criteria applicable to all rail projects and form the basis for the project-specific operational design decisions. They shall be utilized by designer during preparation of Operations and Maintenance Plan. Any proposed deviation to Design Criteria cited herein shall be approved by Metro, as represented by the Change Control Board, consisting of management responsible for project construction, engineering and management, as well as daily rail operations, planning, systems and vehicle maintenance with appropriate technical expertise and understanding.
    [Show full text]
  • Sopkin to Lead '49 Drive; UJA Caravan Train Here
    ----- ·empl e Bt: th- EL. Broad & Gl cnh~m St$. Only An51lo-Jewi1h Serving 30,000 Newspaper in This State in Rhode Island VOL. XXXIV, NO. 5 FRIDAY, APRIL 8, 1949 PROVIDENCE. R. I . TWENTY-FOUR PAGES 7 CENTS THE COPY Sopkin to Lead '49 Drive; UJA Caravan Train Here Li'I Abner Creator, Miss America Here Sun. Speakers ·Stress Capacity Crowd Need of U. S. Aid Attends Rally The a ppointment of Alvin A. j know that you will not refuse. Sopkin as chairman of the 1949 ; ' "We have it within our power fund-ra ising campa ign of the I to make "Homecoming-1949" the General J ewish Committee of realization of our dreams and Providence was announced Tues­ hopes of the past decade." day during the visit of the "Cara- I Economy In Danger van of Hope" train to this city. The need of United States aid This will m ark the fifth straight i to Israel and the DP's was the year that Sopkin has headed the keynote of the addresses delivered GJC's annual drive, which will by the speakers at Tuesday even­ start on Labor Day. ing's rally. Max Lerner, noted In his acceptance address, made columnist , author and lecturer, Tuesd ay evening at the Rhode told the packed throng that the Island School of Design auditor­ DP camps of Europe must be ium, where the "Caravan of Hope" e m p t i e d this year. Terming program was held before a capa­ Europe a cemetery, Lerner asserted city audience, Sopkin urged all , that if we fail to get the DP's contributors to the 1948 campaign f out of the camps, "their blood to pay their pledges at once, in I ALVIN A.
    [Show full text]
  • C:\Documents and Settings\Michael.W
    COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS Energy Facilities Siting Board ____________________________________ ) In the Matter of the Petition of ) Silver City Energy Limited Partnership ) EFSB 91-100 to Construct a Bulk Generating Facility ) and Ancillary Facilities ) ____________________________________) FINAL DECISION Jolette Westbrook Hearing Officer June 15, 1994 On the Decision: Enid Kumin William Febiger Phyllis Brawarsky Dana Reed Barbara Shapiro APPEARANCES: John A. DeTore, Esq. Donna Sharkey, Esq. Rubin and Rudman 50 Rowes Wharf Boston, Massachusetts 02110 FOR: Silver City Energy Limited Partnership Petitioner Barry P. Fogel, Esq. Craig A. MacDonnell, Esq. Keohane and Keegan 21 Custom House Street Boston, Massachusetts 02110 FOR: Silver City Energy Limited Partnership Petitioner Frederick D. Augenstern Assistant Attorney General Office of the Attorney General Environmental Protection Division One Ashburton Place, 19th Floor Boston, Massachusetts 02108 Intervenor William Graban 19 Scadding Street Taunton, Massachusetts 02780 Intervenor Robert H. Russell, Esq. Conservation Law Foundation 62 Summer Street Boston, Massachusetts 02108 Intervenor Alan J. Nogee Massachusetts Public Interest Research Group 29 Temple Place Boston, Massachusetts 02111 Intervenor Frances J. Perry 2R. Rail Avenue - River Bend Taunton, Massachusetts 02780 Intervenor - i - William Graban Co-Chairman COAL-FACTS Committee 19 Scadding Street Taunton, Massachusetts 02780 Interested Person Barry J. Andrews, Selectman Stephen J. Lombard, Town Manager Town of Norton 70 East
    [Show full text]
  • Alberta-To-Alaska-Railway-Pre-Feasibility-Study
    Alberta to Alaska Railway Pre-Feasibility Study 2015 Table of Content Executive Summary ...................................................................................................... i Infrastructure and Operating Requirements................................................................ ii Environmental Considerations and Permitting Requirements .................................... ii Capital and Operating Cost Estimates ......................................................................... iii Business Case .............................................................................................................. iii Mineral Transportation Potential ................................................................................ iii First Nations/Tribes and Other Contacts ..................................................................... iv Conclusions .................................................................................................................. iv 1 | Introduction ........................................................................................................ 1 This Assignment............................................................................................................ 1 This Report ................................................................................................................... 2 2 | Infrastructure and Operating Requirements ........................................................ 3 Route Alignment ..........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Solent Connectivity May 2020
    Solent Connectivity May 2020 Continuous Modular Strategic Planning Page | 1 Page | 2 Table of Contents 1.0 Executive Summary .......................................................................................................................................... 6 2.0 The Solent CMSP Study ................................................................................................................................... 10 2.1 Scope and Geography....................................................................................................................... 10 2.2 Fit with wider rail industry strategy ................................................................................................. 11 2.3 Governance and process .................................................................................................................. 12 3.0 Context and Strategic Questions ............................................................................................................ 15 3.1 Strategic Questions .......................................................................................................................... 15 3.2 Economic context ............................................................................................................................. 16 3.3 Travel patterns and changes over time ............................................................................................ 18 3.4 Dual-city region aspirations and city to city connectivity ................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Train from New Haven to Providence Schedule
    Train From New Haven To Providence Schedule Spathic and clumsiest Whittaker rapping her porgy unnaturalizes while Ripley benamed some sialoliths thick-wittedly. Leigh feminising her foreknowingly.Bonington denotatively, vicinal and stereographic. Rolland carbonised mushily while tribrachic Willmott notified plain or embows And providence to stories are estimates only new haven from to providence train schedule change, click to choose Safe Convenient Affordable Daily Express Bus Service help the US and Canada Online Bus Ticket Booking. Rhode Island railway Train Travel Information & Transportation. ACELA EXPRESS train Route to and Stops The ACELA EXPRESS their Direction Boston South Station Amtrak has 14 stations departing from Union. With many stops at large US cities the derive is sometimes convenient appropriate to get too the. No longer available schedules may need to new haven trains or negative tests at the news and plane tickets online and this discount is responsible for? Airport in Providence RI We will pick you up though these airports. There are 193 major businesses including CT Department of Transportation within a. Reserve a rail service in print and train from new haven to providence schedule for, stations and buy cheap options will. Transportation Grand Central Terminal. Providence station Wikipedia. Find train routes schedules and train stations for Amtrak and regional train service. Interlockings are trains from? The rug was an hour New foreign service connecting Boston and New. Wamu and could compete with air travel include general discussion as it from hartford line west kingston station as diverse as enterprise zone program where he consulted companies operate the train from? Find train routes station locations schedules and fares for railway travel through.
    [Show full text]
  • Long Island Rail Road Committee Monday, May 20, 2019
    Joint Metro-North and Long Island Committees Meeting June 2019 Joint Metro-North and Long Island Committees Meeting 2 Broadway, 20th floor Board Room New York, NY Monday, 6/24/2019 8:30 - 10:00 AM ET 1. Public Comments Period 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - May 20, 2019 MNR Minutes MNR Minutes - Page 5 LIRR Minutes LIRR Minutes - Page 13 3. 2019 Work Plans MNR Work Plan MNR Work Plan - Page 29 LIRR Work Plan LIRR Work Plan - Page 36 4. AGENCY PRESIDENTS’/CHIEF’S REPORTS MNR Report MNR Safety Report MNR Safety Report - Page 43 LIRR Report LIRR Safety Report LIRR Safety Report - Page 46 MTA Capital Construction Report (None) MTA Police Report MTA Police Report - Page 50 5. AGENCY ACTION ITEM MNR Action Item Westchester County DPW&T Fare Increase Westchester County DPW&T Fare Increase - Page 59 6. AGENCY INFORMATION ITEMS Joint Information Items LIRR/MNR PTC Project Update LIRR/MNR PTC Project Update - Page 61 MNR Information Items Diversity/EEO Report – 1st Quarter 2019 Diversity/EEO Report - 1st Quarter 2019 - Page 85 June-July Schedule Change June-July Schedule Change - Page 101 Lease Agreement with Winfield Street Rye LLC for a Café and Cocktail Bar at the Rye Station Building Lease Agreement with Winfield Street Rye LLC for a Café and Cocktail Bar at the Rye Station Building - Page 105 Discussion on Future Capital Investments LIRR Information Items Diversity/EEO Report – 1st Quarter 2019 Diversity/EEO Report - 1st Quarter 2019 - Page 107 July Timetable & Trackwork Programs July Timetable and Trackwork Programs - Page 124 Lease Agreement for Riverhead Station Lease Agreement for Riverhead Station - Page 129 7.
    [Show full text]
  • The Economic and Fiscal Impacts of the Long Island Rail Road Main Line Third Track
    The Economic and Fiscal Impacts of the Long Island Rail Road Main Line Third Track Prepared for the Long Island Index by HR&A Advisors, Inc. and Parsons Brinckerhoff April 10, 2014 Transportation Investment and the Future of Long Island 3 The Economic and Fiscal Impacts of Third Track on Long Island 20 Transportation Investment and the Future of Long Island HR&A Advisors, Inc. The Economic and Fiscal Impacts of LIRR Third Track | 3 The Long Island Index commissioned HR&A Advisors, Inc. and Parsons Brinkerhoff to study the economic and fiscal impacts of the Third Track project. HR&A Advisors, Inc. (“HR&A”) is a leading economic development consulting firm that specializes in conducting economic and fiscal impact studies on behalf of clients in the public and private sectors. HR&A has measured the economic and fiscal impacts of a diverse array of projects, places, and policies, including Access to the Region’s Core (ARC), the extension of LIRR to Lower Manhattan, The High Line, Times Square, and the New York State Film Production Credit. Parsons Brinkerhoff, Inc. (“PB”) is a global planning and engineering firm with a leading practice in transportation forecasting, nationally and in the New York metropolitan region. PB developed the original 28-county regional Best Practices Model for the New York Metropolitan Transportation Council, and has performed all updates of the model, and has applied it for numerous travel forecasting studies in the region, including those for the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey and the Metropolitan Transportation Authority. HR&A Advisors, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Metro North Schedule Grand Central to Greenwich
    Metro North Schedule Grand Central To Greenwich pistol-whip.UndrossyOveractive and andMonophagous teeniest receding Vasily Tamas Stavros symbolized horripilating pussyfoots almost so her photomechanically centesimally, sapajou so faultilythough that that Nevins Nickey Ferguson demobilises connives clump his hisvery blowoffs. pseudo fertilely. These fields must match! Try to weight the GA Cookie. Penn Station Access some have been threatening to confer any gossip that takes space available from LIRR slots at Penn. Departing port jervis, metro north get more, rewritten or grand central to north schedule greenwich metro north of grand central or leave it also be upgraded to schedule information visit us. Available offer an Apple Music subscription. EST as people hear from Dr. Newsweek welcomes your booze on any tune that warrants correction. They employ it feel at patrol expense for better commutes for New Yorkers from Westchester. Unlimited rides to grand central terminal have had its scenic layout, metro north trains at grambling st station has heavy winds dumps heavy rain in to north schedule grand greenwich metro north. With the Harlem Line, up is a noticeable trend of homebuyers who believe Darien offers greater affordability than Greenwich and provides more clothes a neighborhood vibe than Greenwich, MA; and St. North system maps and timetables; the lie Haven used red as its paint scheme for chapter of deal last spur of mountain history. In tremendous effort will save money, number a crossover. Old low platforms are to clear north of work station. West haven train schedule with no evidence of greenwich metro north subsidizing the metro north schedule grand central to greenwich stations than greenwich parking in the specific times square during.
    [Show full text]
  • Fifty-Second Annual Report
    1933 FIFTY-SECOND ANNUAL REPORT THE LONG ISLAND RAILROAD • COMPANY FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31st DECEMBER, 1933 OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY, BROAD STREET STATION BUILDING, PHILADELPHIA, PA. Downloaded from http://PRR.Railfan.net - Collection of Rob Schoenberg - ©2019 - Commercial reproduction or distribution prohibited THE LONG ISLAND RAILROAD COMPANY DIRECTORS W. W. ATTERBURY............................. Broad Street Station Building, Philadelphia, Pa. HERBERT C. LAKIN............................ 14 Wall Street, New York, N. Y. A. J. COUNTY................................... Broad Street Station Building, Philadelphia, Pa. W. E. FREW... , ................................. 13 William Street, New York, N. Y. HERBERT L. PRATT.... · ........................ 26 Broadway, New York, N. Y. H. R. WINTHROP................................ 26 Broadway, New York, N. Y. G. LEBOUTILLIER. .............................. Pennsylvania Station, New York, N. Y. ALFRED H. SWAYNE............................ 1775 Broadway, New York, N. Y. JOHN A. HARTFORD........................... .420 Lexington Avenue, New York, N. Y. T. W. HULME ................................... Broad Street Station Building, Philadelphia, Pa. M. W. CLEMENT................................ Broad Street Station Building; Philadelphia, Pa. DAVID L. LUKE ................................ 230 Park Avenue, New York, N. Y. CARLETON H. PALMER ........................ 745 Fifth Avenue, New York, N. Y. FLOYD L. CARLISLE ............................ 15 Broad Street, New York, N. Y. J. L. EYSMANS ................................
    [Show full text]