Rail Accident Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Rail Accident Report Rail Accident Report Collision at Swanage station 16 November 2006 Report 35/2007 September 2007 This investigation was carried out in accordance with: l the Railway Safety Directive 2004/49/EC; l the Railways and Transport Safety Act 2003; and l the Railways (Accident Investigation and Reporting) Regulations 2005. © Crown copyright 2007 You may re-use this document/publication (not including departmental or agency logos) free of charge in any format or medium. You must re-use it accurately and not in a misleading context. The material must be acknowledged as Crown copyright and you must give the title of the source publication. Where we have identified any third party copyright material you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. This document/publication is also available at www.raib.gov.uk. Any enquiries about this publication should be sent to: RAIB Email: [email protected] The Wharf Telephone: 01332 253300 Stores Road Fax: 01332 253301 Derby UK Website: www.raib.gov.uk DE21 4BA This report is published by the Rail Accident Investigation Branch, Department for Transport. Rail Accident Investigation Branch 3 Report 35/2007 www.raib.gov.uk September 2007 Collision at Swanage station 16 November 2006 Contents Introduction 6 Summary of the report 7 Key facts about the accident 7 Immediate cause, causal and contributory factors, underlying causes 7 Recommendations 8 The Accident 9 Summary of the accident 9 Location 9 The parties involved 10 External circumstances 10 The infrastructure 10 The train 12 Events preceding the accident 13 Events during the accident 14 Consequences of the accident 15 Events following the accident 15 The Investigation 16 Sources of evidence 16 Key facts 16 Previous occurrences of a similar character 17 Analysis 18 Identification of the immediate cause 18 Identification of causal factors 18 Identification of contributory factors 19 Rail Accident Investigation Branch Report 35/2007 www.raib.gov.uk September 2007 Conclusions 20 Immediate cause 20 Causal factors 20 Contributory factors 20 Additional observations 20 Actions already taken or in progress relevant to this report 21 Recommendations 22 Recommendations to address causal and contributory factors 22 Recommendations to address matters observed during this investigation 22 Appendices 23 Appendix A: Glossary of abbreviations and acronyms 23 Appendix B: Glossary of terms 24 Rail Accident Investigation Branch 5 Report 35/2007 www.raib.gov.uk September 2007 Introduction 1 The sole purpose of an investigation by the Rail Accident Investigation Branch (RAIB) is to prevent future accidents and incidents and improve railway safety. 2 The RAIB does not establish blame or liability, or carry out prosecutions. 3 Access was freely given by Swanage Railway Company Ltd to their staff, data and records in connection with the investigation. 4 Appendices at the rear of the report contain the following glossaries: l acronyms and abbreviations are explained in appendix A; and l technical terms (shown in italics when they first appear in this report) are explained in appendix B. Rail Accident Investigation Branch Report 35/2007 www.raib.gov.uk September 2007 Summary Key facts about the accident 5 At 12:21 hrs on Thursday 16 November 2006 an engineer’s train entered platform 2 at Swanage and collided with a rake of carriages that were stabled there. 6 Two members of Swanage Railway personnel were treated by ambulance staff, but neither required hospital treatment. 7 The locomotive and one carriage sustained damage to the buffers and surrounding bodywork. Location of accident © Crown Copyright. All rights reserved. Department for Transport 100020237 2007 Figure 1: Extract from Ordnance Survey maps showing location of accident Immediate cause, causal and contributory factors, underlying causes 8 The immediate cause was the locomotive driver did not register the signalled route of the train when he checked the signal before starting the train move. 9 A causal factor was that the driver controlled the locomotive from the rear cab (paragraph 69); 10 Contributory factors were: (a) the signalman selected a route into an occupied platform; and (b) the lack of a clear understanding of the shunting movements between the operations manager and the driver. 11 Three observations are made regarding improving the operational safety of the Swanage Railway. None of these refer to issues that caused or contributed to the accident. Rail Accident Investigation Branch 7 Report 35/2007 www.raib.gov.uk September 2007 Recommendations 12 Recommendations can be found in paragraph 87. They relate to the following areas: l amendment of the Swanage Railway rule book requirements for shunting; l safety critical communications on the Swanage Railway; l driver medical standards on the Swanage Railway; and l protection of Swanage Railway staff working in the interior of trains. Rail Accident Investigation Branch Report 35/2007 www.raib.gov.uk September 2007 The Accident Summary of the accident 13 An engineer’s train hauled by former British Railways (BR) class 33/1 diesel locomotive 33 108 ran into Swanage station and collided with a rake of carriages that were stabled in platform 2. 14 Two members of Swanage Railway personnel were treated by ambulance staff, but neither required hospital treatment. 15 The locomotive and one carriage became buffer-locked and both vehicles sustained damage to the buffers and surrounding bodywork. Figure 2: Damage sustained to the locomotive and carriage Location 16 The Swanage Railway is a 6 ¾ mile (10.8 km) standard gauge un-electrified heritage railway located in Dorset. Before 1972 it was part of the British Railways network, and it has been operated as a heritage railway since 1979. The Swanage Railway currently operates a passenger service between Swanage and Norden, a distance of 5½ miles (9.2 km). Figure 3 gives an overview of the line. 17 The accident occurred at Swanage, the eastern terminus of the line. Rail Accident Investigation Branch Report 35/2007 www.raib.gov.uk September 2007 To Furzebrook and Network Rail Norden 9.2 km Corfe Castle 6.4 km Harmans Cross 4.8 km Ponderosa work site 3.6 km Swanage 0 km Figure 3: Overview of the Swanage Railway, showing distances from Swanage station The parties involved 18 Four members of Swanage Railway staff were involved in the movement of the train: l the driver, a full time employee; l the signalman, a part time employee; l the operations manager, a full time employee; and l the train guard, a volunteer member of staff. 19 Each person was qualified and medically competent in accordance with Swanage Railway requirements for the duties that they were carrying out. External circumstances 20 On 16 November the weather was overcast with frequent rain showers. 21 Although it was raining at the time of the accident, this had no significant effect on the visibility of signals, points positions or the line ahead. The infrastructure 22 Swanage station has an island platform. Platform 1 is no longer directly accessible from the running line, and carriages providing storage and a catering outlet are permanently stabled in it. Platform 2 is the sole operational platform; a loop exists to the north of it. There is a single siding to the south of platform 1 and a locomotive depot outside the station. Access to platform 1 and the south siding is by a headshunt, which can only be accessed from platform 2 or the loop line (Figure 4). 23 Semaphore signalling is in use; Figure 4 shows a simplified signal configuration for trains arriving from Harmans Cross. Rail Accident Investigation Branch 10 Report 35/2007 www.raib.gov.uk September 2007 Swanage station area - Key Wagon simplified signalling for arriving trains N Class 08 locomotive Carriage Class 33 locomotive Ground signal Loco depot Turntable Home signal Signal box Loop Signal 2 Signal 19 Signal 25 26 points 29 points Platform 2 To Harmans Cross 1 Main line Goods shed road Figure 4: Layout of track at Swanage station, showing signals applicable to an arriving train 24 Ground signal no.25 controls the final approach to the station platform or loop. When the signal is in the proceed (or ‘off’) position a route indicator displays either the letter ‘M’ when the route is set for the Main (platform 2), or ‘L’ when the route is set for the Loop. The ‘M’ and ‘L’ are illuminated whenever in use (Figure 5). Figure 5: Signal 25 as seen looking towards Swanage station. The ‘M’ indication is displayed Rail Accident Investigation Branch 11 Report 35/2007 www.raib.gov.uk September 2007 The train 25 The train involved in the collision consisted of a locomotive, number 33 108, and 6 wagons. 26 The locomotive was built in the early 1960’s by the Birmingham Railway Carriage & Wagon Co for service on BR, and was purchased for preservation on withdrawal from BR service. It is now owned by the Class 33/1 Preservation Group, and operates on the Swanage Railway. The locomotive is an eight wheeled bogie diesel locomotive, and has driving cabs at both ends, and is colloquially referred to as the ‘Crompton’ on the Swanage Railway, a reference to the manufacturer of its electrical equipment (Figure 6). Figure 6: Class 33/1 locomotive 27 Two brake vans were provided, one coupled at each end of the wagons in the train, because the wagons in the train were not continuously braked. 28 There were 5 carriages stabled in platform 2. All were of the ex BR mark 1 type. The handbrake in the guard’s van in these carriages had been applied as a parking brake, in accordance with the Swanage Railway rule book. 29 The westernmost carriage in platform 2 carried a tail lamp capable of giving a red light that was visible to arriving trains.
Recommended publications
  • Relative Train Length and the Infrastructure Required to Mitigate Delays from Operating Combinations of Normal and Over-Length F
    Original Article Proc IMechE Part F: J Rail and Rapid Transit 0(0) 1–12 Relative train length and the ! IMechE 2018 Article reuse guidelines: infrastructure required to mitigate sagepub.com/journals-permissions DOI: 10.1177/0954409718809204 delays from operating combinations journals.sagepub.com/home/pif of normal and over-length freight trains on single-track railway lines in North America C Tyler Dick , Ivan Atanassov, F Bradford Kippen III and Darkhan Mussanov Abstract Distributed power locomotives have facilitated longer heavy-haul freight trains that improve the efficiency of railway operations. In North America, where the majority of mainlines are single track, the potential operational and economic advantages of long trains are limited by the inadequate length of many existing passing sidings (passing loops). To alleviate the challenge of operating trains that exceed the length of passing sidings, railways preserve the mainline capacity by extending passing sidings. However, industry practitioners rarely optimize the extent of infrastructure investment for the volume of over-length train traffic on a particular route. This paper investigates how different combinations of normal and over-length trains, and their relative lengths, relate to the number of siding extensions necessary to mitigate the delay performance of over-length train operation on a single-track rail corridor. The experiments used Rail Traffic Controller simulation software to determine train delay for various combinations of short and long train lengths under different directional distributions of a given daily railcar throughput volume. Simulation results suggest a relationship between the ratio of train lengths and the infrastructure expansion required to eliminate the delay introduced by operating over- length trains on the initial route.
    [Show full text]
  • Irchel Tram Depot – Headshunt Redevelopment
    Zurich Public Transport, Infrastructure Irchel Tram Depot – Headshunt Redevelopment 27.09.2021 Page 1 Irchel Tram Depot – Headshunt Redevelopment Client Facts Zurich Public Transport, Infrastructure Period 2010 - 2013 Project Country Switzerland Redeveloped headshunt enables Zurich Public Transport (VBZ) to operate its Irchel Tram Depot more efficiently. Difficult and time-consuming shunting tasks are now a thing of the past. Trams with low-floor cars in the middle and trailers (also referred to as “sedan-pony trams”) have been in operation on Line 7 since November 2010. These trams are now to be maintained and housed at the Irchel Tram Depot. The existing headshunt was not long enough to permit the expeditious handling of trams longer than 43 metres. Handling the 45-metre sedan-pony trams on the existing headshunt involved disconnecting the tram cars, shunting them separately into the depot and then reconnecting them – an overly complicated, time consuming and operationally impractical process. In response, Zurich Public Transport (VBZ) initiated an internal process of identifying alternative solutions. These solutions were also expected to take account of the new tram specifications that will apply following Zurich Public Transport’s purchase of a new tram generation (NTG). In October 2010, Zurich Public Transport commissioned EBP to conduct an independent and comprehensive review of the various development proposals it had worked out. The review was also to include an examination of the associated costs and relative merits of the proposed construction measures and their impact on the depot’s immediate vicinity and on railway operation in general. Working in the capacity of a general planner, EBP evaluated the various proposals and used the results of its review to outline the steps that would need to be taken to gain approval for and execute the redevelopment project.
    [Show full text]
  • C&O Has Good Ideas In
    Siding thrown over to locate main track signal between main and siding C & 0 Has Good Ideas in CTC Sheet-metal houses not only at switches but also at interme­ diate signals and use of hold-out signals are features of this project. Well organized construction requires no work trains. TO INCREASE TRACK CAPAC­ portant freight line. Numerous Windsor, Ont., and Blenheim, Ont. ITY, facilitate train movements industries , including large, automo­ Previously no signaling was in and reduce operating expenses, the bile factories, are located at Plym­ service on the single track between Chesapeake & Ohio has installed outh , Flint and Saginaw. Also the Plymouth and Kearsley interlock­ centralized traffic control on 55 Plymouth-Saginaw section is part ing at Flint. Two tracks extend miles of single-track between Plym­ of an important route to and from north from Plymouth 1.0 mile to a outh, Mich., and Mount Morris, Ludington, Mich., which is the port power switch which is included in Mich. This project connects with for C&O car ferries, operated all the new CTC. At Wixom there are CTC previously in service on 24 year, across Lake Michigan to and two sidings with power switches miles between Mt. Morris and from Wisconsin ports of Milwau­ included in the CTC. Other sidings Saginaw, Mich., the entire 79 miles kee, Manitowoc and Kewaunee. with power switches included in between Plymouth and Saginaw the CTC are at Clyde and Newark. now being controlled from a ma­ Twenty Trains Dally These sidings were lengthened to chine at Saginaw. hold 112 and 133 cars respectively .
    [Show full text]
  • the Swindon and Cricklade Railway
    The Swindon and Cricklade Railway Construction of the Permanent Way Document No: S&CR S PW001 Issue 2 Format: Microsoft Office 2010 August 2016 SCR S PW001 Issue 2 Copy 001 Page 1 of 33 Registered charity No: 1067447 Registered in England: Company No. 3479479 Registered office: Blunsdon Station Registered Office: 29, Bath Road, Swindon SN1 4AS 1 Document Status Record Status Date Issue Prepared by Reviewed by Document owner Issue 17 June 2010 1 D.J.Randall D.Herbert Joint PW Manager Issue 01 Aug 2016 2 D.J.Randall D.Herbert / D Grigsby / S Hudson PW Manager 2 Document Distribution List Position Organisation Copy Issued To: Copy No. (yes/no) P-Way Manager S&CR Yes 1 Deputy PW Manager S&CR Yes 2 Chairman S&CR (Trust) Yes 3 H&S Manager S&CR Yes 4 Office Files S&CR Yes 5 3 Change History Version Change Details 1 to 2 Updates throughout since last release SCR S PW001 Issue 2 Copy 001 Page 2 of 33 Registered charity No: 1067447 Registered in England: Company No. 3479479 Registered office: Blunsdon Station Registered Office: 29, Bath Road, Swindon SN1 4AS Table of Contents 1 Document Status Record ....................................................................................................................................... 2 2 Document Distribution List ................................................................................................................................... 2 3 Change History .....................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Paterson Points NEWSLETTER of the RAIL MOTOR SOCIETY INCORPORATED
    Paterson Points NEWSLETTER OF THE RAIL MOTOR SOCIETY INCORPORATED FEBRUARY 2014 Patron ~ Rear Admiral Peter Sinclair AC Inside... ~ Society News ~ Tour Reports ~ Operations Diary ~ AGM Saturday 22 March Clear of the main line, the CPHs stabled for the night adjacent to Gilgandra’s loading bank. Photo: James Brook PRINT POST APPROVED PP100003904 Society News Operations Report Annual General Meeting ~ Bruce Agland, Operations Manager Members are advised that this important meeting will be held on Saturday 22nd March commencing at 1000hrs, the Operations for 2014 formal meeting notice and associated forms are included 4 January Dungog (CPH), Archer with this newsletter. 14-15 January Junee (402), ARTC Election of Five Board Members 19 January Nowra (620), ARHS In accordance with the new Constitution, five of those 25 January Tamworth (620), Maitland Rotary members of the Board elected at the AGM in 2013 will 15-16 February Metro Freight Lines (620), retire but will be eligible for re-election should they decide Epping Model Railway Club to nominate again. 8 March Metro (620), Private Charter 4-6 April Orange (620), Travelscene Membership Renewals 12-13 April Steamfest, (TBC), The Rail Motor Society Members are advised that your membership subscription for 14-15 April Binnaway (402), ARHS Queensland 2014 that was due on 1st January is now OVERDUE. 3 May Denman (620), Kalverla Unfinancial members are not eligible to vote at the Annual 3 May Denman (CPH), Ede General Meeting and proxy forms will not be validated if you 17-18 May Gulgong (CPH), Scott are unfinancial before the start of the meeting.
    [Show full text]
  • Alberta-To-Alaska-Railway-Pre-Feasibility-Study
    Alberta to Alaska Railway Pre-Feasibility Study 2015 Table of Content Executive Summary ...................................................................................................... i Infrastructure and Operating Requirements................................................................ ii Environmental Considerations and Permitting Requirements .................................... ii Capital and Operating Cost Estimates ......................................................................... iii Business Case .............................................................................................................. iii Mineral Transportation Potential ................................................................................ iii First Nations/Tribes and Other Contacts ..................................................................... iv Conclusions .................................................................................................................. iv 1 | Introduction ........................................................................................................ 1 This Assignment............................................................................................................ 1 This Report ................................................................................................................... 2 2 | Infrastructure and Operating Requirements ........................................................ 3 Route Alignment ..........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Derails in Passing Sidings? As 1.5 U 'Ually the Case, It I'> Impo%Ible to Move Tre Insulated Ioiflt
    30 RAILWAY SIGNALING Vol. 24, No.1 i\s the InSUlltld joint i" a :,ecessary part aT the 19nal ( ,,) In torcing rat elK~ - 1)art use a ratl expander It system as well as 0" the t'c.ck, it mturally follows tl1dt It one IS &t haIld DC! not use an )rdinary full tap"'r '"rack belongs neither to one department nor to the other, but chise1. If a chisel muq be usen, use on(; whICh is wider to both, Therefore, both departments should interest th,l11 the rail-head and which has a small japer, 111 order themselves 111 hcping 'nsulated joil'ts in repair in an to 1\ aid d~.ma2ing the rail el d. efficient and er ollomin1 mannu, (0 Do It bend 'lOlts or drive them through btl ~h;ngs. 11o:t men who are ell cdl} responsible for the care If rail end~ a d ;oir,t parts Ir in prope' POSI io 1, he of JO'nts ha\ e found that mp1 r defects, which req~lre bn]ts can be l11::-e ted w thO'lt rr...lt1:'n", n' bending. very little til e to remedy, such a" loose r,ub. lipped (7) Paler 1 .suL i II W 11 nN 'dthstand the erorl"ous rail tnds, rail fins cutting mto 5.11er, low or loose ties fon (' of rail expansion in hot weather. After the proper and defeclive spikl11g, should be corrected Immediately OpUlIllg IS secured between the rail cnus for the ll1 ertion upon being detected a £ the end post: it should be held, a::: much as pOSSIble, Frequent inspection shuuld be made, SIgnal mail­ by the installatlOl1 of ~ail ancile r5.
    [Show full text]
  • Solent Connectivity May 2020
    Solent Connectivity May 2020 Continuous Modular Strategic Planning Page | 1 Page | 2 Table of Contents 1.0 Executive Summary .......................................................................................................................................... 6 2.0 The Solent CMSP Study ................................................................................................................................... 10 2.1 Scope and Geography....................................................................................................................... 10 2.2 Fit with wider rail industry strategy ................................................................................................. 11 2.3 Governance and process .................................................................................................................. 12 3.0 Context and Strategic Questions ............................................................................................................ 15 3.1 Strategic Questions .......................................................................................................................... 15 3.2 Economic context ............................................................................................................................. 16 3.3 Travel patterns and changes over time ............................................................................................ 18 3.4 Dual-city region aspirations and city to city connectivity ................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Railway Siding Rules and Regulations
    Appendix no. 2 – Characteristics of railway siding infrastructure elements (excerpt) RAILWAY SIDING RULES AND REGULATIONS: CENTRUM LOGISTYCZNO INWESTYCYJNE POZNAŃ II SPÓŁKA Z OGRANICZONĄ ODPOWIEDZIALNOŚCIĄ 62-020 SWARZĘDZ - JASIN, UL. RABOWICKA 6, Valid from 1st November 2017 1 1. Technical description of railway siding: 2.1. Location of railway siding: Centrum Logistyczno Inwestycyjne Poznań II sp. z o.o. siding is a station siding with branching turnout no. 6 to station track no. 6b of Swarzędz station at km 291.017 of railway line no. 003 Warsaw West - Kunowice (for the siding it is km 0.000 - beginning of turnout no. 6 is the beginning of the siding track). 2.2. Switch circles and traffic operation positions and their manning: CLIP II Railway siding constitutes five manoeuvring zones. No traffic operation position and manning on the siding. 2.3. Location of delivery-acceptance points at the siding: 1) The acceptance track for wagons, groups of wagons and full train sets brought by the Carrier is track no. 101 or track no. 105 of the siding CENTRUM LOGISTYCZNO INWESTYCYJNE POZNAŃ II. 2) The delivery track for wagons, groups of wagons and full train sets brought by the Carrier is track no. 101 or track no. 103 of the siding CENTRUM LOGISTYCZNO INWESTYCYJNEGO POZNAŃ II. 3) On site, the delivery-acceptance point is marked with a sign “Delivery-acceptance point”, the sign is located at the intertrack space of tracks 101 and 103. 2.4. Tracks on siding: General length of track Usable length of track Capacity - Notes (‰) section section Purpose Track no.
    [Show full text]
  • Eastern Railway
    2.1.1 पूव रेलवे EASTERN RAILWAY 20192019----2020 के िलए पƗरसंपिēयĪ कƙ खरीद , िनमाϕण और बदलाव Assets-Acquisition, Construction and Replacement for 2019-20 (Figures in thousand of Rupees)(आंकड़े हजार Đ . मĞ) पूंजी पूंजी िनिध मूआिन िविन संिन रारेसंको जोड़ िववरण Particulars Capital CF DRF. DF SF RRSK TOTAL 11 (a ) New Lines (Construction) 70,70,00 .. .. .. .. .. 70,70,00 14 G Gauge Conversion 2,00,00 .. .. .. .. .. 2,00,00 15 ह Doubling 9,80,95 .. .. .. .. .. 9,80,95 16 - G Traffic Facilities-Yard 21,22,84 .. 90,25 13,22,19 .. 29,97,50 65,32,78 G ^ G Remodelling & Others 17 Computerisation 3,51,00 .. 12,41,30 62,00 .. .. 16,54,30 21 Rolling Stock 30,24,90 .. .. 7,66 .. 37,56,01 67,88,57 22 * 4 - Leased Assets - Payment of 518,12,69 205,67,31 .. .. .. .. 723,80,00 Capital Component 29 E G - Road Safety Works-Level .. .. .. .. .. 38,60,00 38,60,00 Crossings. 30 E G -/ Road Safety Works-Road .. .. .. .. .. 113,06,79 113,06,79 Over/Under Bridges. 31 Track Renewals .. .. .. .. .. 587,20,77 587,20,77 32 G Bridge Works .. .. .. .. .. 69,69,90 69,69,90 33 G Signalling and .. .. .. .. .. 83,25,97 83,25,97 Telecommunication 36 ^ G - G Other Electrical Works excl 1,34,17 .. 4,38,47 2,62,72 .. 5,08,29 13,43,65 K TRD 37 G G Traction Distribution Works 16,00,00 .. .. .. .. 110,59,55 126,59,55 41 U Machinery & Plant 5,16,94 .
    [Show full text]
  • Camden Railway Station a Reminder of Incessant Government Under-Funding of the Nsw Rail System
    CAMDEN RAILWAY STATION A REMINDER OF INCESSANT GOVERNMENT UNDER-FUNDING OF THE NSW RAIL SYSTEM These notes relate only to the history of the passenger facilities at the Camden terminus. The history of the branch line has already been published. Alan Smith, a long-time member of the Australian Railway Historical Society and a frequent volunteer at its Resource Centre, won the competition to choose the cover photo for these notes. It seems strange that Alan chose a photograph not of the terminus but of an intermediate station, Kenny Hill. Why? Alan considered that this was the “iconic image of the challenges that existed in the day-to-day operation of the Camden line”. Specifically, the photograph shows the absence of priority given to passengers when the train crew had to decide whether to convey people or freight. It should be of no surprise that people lost out. Bob Merchant took this undated photograph on a day when the steam locomotive simply could not succeed in climbing the gradient. In the composition of the train were two milk pots. They were next to the engine. There was no question of reversing the train to Narellan, shunting and then proceeding with the only the passenger car. Why not? Because the milk pots had to be attached to No. 32 Express Goods or there would be serious trouble for the train crew if the Camden milk did not accompany the other milk vans from Bowral and Menangle on the train. What! Passengers are voters. Not so much in 1963 when the line closed.
    [Show full text]
  • Railway Goods Sheds and Warehouses Introductions to Heritage Assets Summary
    Railway Goods Sheds and Warehouses Introductions to Heritage Assets Summary Historic England’s Introductions to Heritage Assets (IHAs) are accessible, authoritative, illustrated summaries of what we know about specific types of archaeological site, building, landscape or marine asset. Typically they deal with subjects which lack such a summary. This can either be where the literature is dauntingly voluminous, or alternatively where little has been written. Most often it is the latter, and many IHAs bring understanding of site or building types which are neglected or little understood. Goods sheds and warehouses played a significant role in the economic life of England until the 1970s. This document gives an overview of the building type from its origins in the late 1820s until the final examples were constructed in the 1960s. It considers the function and development of goods sheds, discusses elements of their design, and gives some examples of how individual railway companies developed their own distinctive styles. This guidance note has been written by John Minnis and edited by Paul Stamper. It is one is of several guidance documents that can be accessed HistoricEngland.org.uk/listing/selection-criteria/listing-selection/ihas-buildings/ First published by Historic England March 2016. All images © Historic England unless otherwise stated. HistoricEngland.org.uk/advice/ Front cover Wellingborough, Northamptonshire (listed Grade II), of a typical small goods shed. In the foreground is is exceptional in retaining both its platform and a pair the indent in the platform for carts to back into and, of 30 hundredweight timber jib cranes. Built by the MR like many sheds, the interior is whitewashed to give in 1857, it gives a good indication of the appearance more light.
    [Show full text]