DOCSLIB.ORG

Railroad Employee Fatalities Investigated by the Federal

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Railroad Employee Fatalities Investigated by the Federal © Railroad Employee US. Department of Transportation Fatalities Investigated by Federal Railroad Administration the Federal Railroad Administration in 1982 Office of Safety DOT/FRA/RRS September 1984 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION ......................................... i CAUSE DIGEST ......................................... ii SUMMARY OF ACCIDENTS INVESTIGATED INVOLVING ONE OR MORE F A T A L I T I E S ............... iv ^ ACCIDENT INVESTIGATION REPORTS ...................... v INTRODUCTION This report represents the Federal Railroad Administration's findings in the investigation of railroad employee fatalities during 1982. Not included are fatalities that occurred during train operation accidents; these are reported under another type of investigation. The purpose of this report is to direct public attention to the hazards inherent in day-to-day operations of railroads. It provides information in support of the overall Federal program to promote the safety of railroad employees. It also furthers the cause of safety by supplying all interested parties information which will help prevent recurrent accidents. Joseph W. Walsh Chairman Railroad Safety Board i CAUSE DIGEST REPORT NUMBER PAGE 1. Accidents related to switching and train operations a. Close clearance 9 19 b. Crossing track in front of or going between trains and/or equipment 7 15 28 60 39 84 56 119 60 128 c. Falling off a moving train or switching equipment consist 20 43 2 2 47 29 62 38 81 40 86 59 126 d. Struck by moving train or equipment being switched 3 5 1 0 2 1 19 40 24 51 36 76 41 88 42 90 49 104 55 117 e. Miscellaneous 1 1 4 8 1 2 25 2 1 45 44 94 62 133 63 135 2. Accidents related to maintenance-of-way inspections and operations a. Struck by train 6 12 25 54 33 70 48 102 54 114 58 12 3 i i CAUSE DIGEST REPORT NUMBER PAGE b. Struck or run over by maintenance-of-way equipment 27 58 46 98 53 1 1 2 c. Contact with a high-voltage line near the track 18 38 23 49 51 108 d. Falling from bridge 8 17 14 29 35 74 e. Miscellaneous 16 34 32 69 34 72 3. Accidents related to inspection, servicing and maintenance of motive power, passenger, and freight equipment a. Servicing and maintenance of freight and passenger equipment 17 36 64 137 b. Miscellaneous 2 3 26 56 45 96 4. Automobile, highway, and truck accidents 13 27 15 32 30 65 31 67 37 79 47 1 0 0 50 107 52 1 1 0 57 1 2 1 61 131 5. Non-accidental death 5 10 1 1 23 6. Miscellaneous 43 92 i i i SUMMARY OF ACCIDENTS INVESTIGATED . INVOLVING ONE OR MORE FATALITIES RAILROAD ACCIDENTS AMTRAK 2 ATSF 2 BN. 14 BO 1 CCO 1 CGA 1 CNW 4 CO 1 CR . , 11 CV 1 HBT 1 ICG 1 LI 1 LN 1 MP 2 NW 5 PW 1 SCL 2 SOO 1 SOU 2 SP 4 TRRA 1 UP 2 UTAH 1 WP 1 i v ACCIDENT INVESTIGATION REPORTS , Page 1. Chesapeake and Ohio’Railway Company \ Gladston, Virginia January 1, 1982 .......................... 1 2. Norfolk and Western Railway Company Tilton, Illinois January 8, 1982 . • •• . 3 v 3. Consolidated Rail Corporation Elkhart, Indiana January 16, 1982.......................... 5 4. Clinchfieid Railroad Company Chesnee, South Carolina January 17, 1982................... ~ . ......... .. 8 5. Chicago and North Western Transportation Company Enterprise, Iowa January 18, 1982......................... 10 6. National Railroad Passenger Corporation Odenton, Maryland January 19, 1982..................... 12 7. Terminal Railroad Association of St. Louis Venice, Illinois January 28, 1982......................... .... • • • 15 8. Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company Perry, Oklahoma February 10, 1982 ....................... 17 9. Southern Railway Company Union, South Carolina February 12, 1982 ................................ 19 10. Consolidated Rail Corporation Canton, Ohio . February 18, 1982 ................. ............... 21 11. Soo Line Railroad Company Arden Hills, Minnesota ” February 22, 1982 .......................... 23 12. Burlington Northern Mt. Morris, Illinois February 22, 1982 ................................ 25 13. Consolidated Rail Corporation Chicago, Illinois February 24, 1982 ................................ 27 v 14. Norfolk and Western Railway Company Potts Valley Connection, Virginia March 1, 1982 ............... ..................... 29 15. Seaboard Coast Line Railroad Como, North Carolina March 8 , 1982 ............................. .. 32 16. Southern Pacific Transportation Company Watsonville Junction, California March 8, 1982 ..................................... 34 17. Southern Railway Company Knoxville, Tennessee March 16, 1982..................................... 36 18. Burlington Northern Wray, Colorado March 22, 1982.................................... 38 19. Union Pacific Railroad Payson, Utah March 26, 1982.................................... 40 20. Houston Belt & Terminal Railway Company Houston, Texas April 4, 1982 .................................... 43 21. Consolidated Rail Corporation Claybank, Ohio April 7, 1982 ................................ 45 22. Burlington Northern Bucklin, Missouri April 8, 1982 .................................... 47 23. National Railroad Passenger Corporation Claymont, Delaware April 19, 1982...................... 49 24. Norfolk and Western Railway Company Lynchburg, Virginia April 24, 1982...................................... 51 25. Burlington Northern Texas, Wyoming April 29, 1982........... 54 26. Western Pacific Railroad Company Camp Rodgers, California April 30, 1982........... 56 27. Utah Railway Company Martin, Utah May 11, 1982....................................... 58 vi 28. Burlington Northern Coburg, Montana May 14, 1982........... 60 29. Consolidated Rail Corporation Newark, New Jersey May 20, 1982. ..................................... 62 30. Southern Pacific Transportation Company Corsicana, Texas May 25, 1982............ 65 31. Central Vermont Railway Amherst, Massachusetts May 26, 1982............................... 67 32. Norfolk and Western Railway Company Dismal, Virginia May 27, 1982...................................... 69 33. Chicago and North Western Transportation Company Chicago, Illinois June 8, 1982................................ 70 34. Missouri Pacific Railroad Company Wynne, Arkansas June 9, 1982. ............. 72 35. Burlington Northern Mt. Pleasant, Iowa June 11, 1982 ............ 74 36. Burlington Northern Hastings, Nebraska June 24, 1982 ..................................... 76 37. Consolidated Rail Corporation New Florence, Pennsylvania July 9, 1982....................................... 79 38. Burlington Northern Pawnee, Oklahoma July 21, 1982 ..................................... 81 39. Burlington Northern Seattle, Washington August 12, 1982 ................................... 84 40. Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Company Connellsville, Pennsylvania August 13, 1982 ............. .... ..... 86 41. Consolidated Rail Corporation Holland, Ohio August 20 , 1982 .................................. 88 vii 42. Chicago and North Western Transportation Company South Pekin,' Illinois August 29, 1982 ............. 1 . .... 90 43. Seaboard Coast Line Railroad Rocky Mount, North Carolina September 1, 1982 ............... .. , . ,......... 92 44. Providence and Worcester Railroad Company Worcester, Massachusetts September 2, 1982 ................. .. 94 45. Burlington Northern Spokane, Washington September 9, 1982 ...................... 96 46. Consolidated Rail Corporation Cleveland, Ohio September 17, 1982................. ............ .. 98 47. Southern Pacific Transportation Company New Iberia, Louisiana September 25, 1982. 100 48. Burlington Northern Upton, Wyoming October 13, 1982...................... 102 49. Norfolk and Western Railway Company Detroit, Michigan October 18, 1982.........‘........................ 104 50. Central of Georgia Railroad Company Bartow, Georgia October 26, 1982................................... 106 51. Chicago and North Western Transportation Company Daggett, Michigan October 26, 1982................................... 108 52. Southern Pacific Transporation Company Gretna, Louisiana November 3, 1982................................... 110 53. Burlington Northern Townley, Alabama November 9, 1982................................... 112 54. Burlington Northern Cicero, Illinois November 10, 1982 ................................. 114 55. Consolidated Rail Corporation Euclid, Ohio November 15, 1982 ................................. 117 viii 56. Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company Los Angeles, California November 29 , 1982 ................................ 119 57. Missouri Pacific Railroad Company Vanderbuilt, Texas December 9, 1982. ................................. 121 58. Union Pacific Railroad Paxton, nebraska December 10, 1982 ......... ........... 123 59. Illinois Central Gulf Railroad Zee, Louisiana December 11, 1982 ................................. 126 60. Louisville and Nashville Railroad Company: Ellijay, Georgia December 12, 1982 ................................. 128 61. Long Island Rail Road Brooklyn, New York December 14, 1982 .......................... 131 62. Consolidated Rail Corporation Lucas, Ohio December 20 , 1982 . ...................... .. 133 63. Burlington Northern Zap, North Dakota December 23, 1982 ........... .......... 135 64. Consolidated Rail Corporation Macedonia, Ohio December 29 , 1982 . ............................. 137 ix REPORT: 1 RAILROAD: Chesapeake and Ohio Railway Company LOCATION: Gladstone, Virginia DATE: January 1, 1982 The Accident A 61-year-old conductor was fatally injured on January 1, 1982, at about 6:05 p.m., in Gladstone, Virginia. Employed by the Chesapeake and Ohio Railway
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Vermont Rail Feasibility Study
    Vermont Rail Feasibility study Vermont Agency of Transportation Final Report March 1993 Submitted by LS Transit Systems, Inc. In association with R.L. Banks & Associates, Inc. Resource Systems Group, Inc. CGA Consulting Services VERMONT RAIL FEASIBILITY STUDY FINAL REPORT Table of Contents Section Paae No. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Background Rail Services Considered Passenger Rail Feasibility Capital, Operating and Maintenance Costs Environmental lmpacts Evaluation of Options Shelburne Road Demonstration Project Synthesized Service Alternative Conclusions and Recommendations 1. INTRODUCTION Background Passenger Rail Service Freight Rail Service Policy Issues 2. PASSENGER RAIL FEASIBILITY Introduction Physical Inventory lntroduction Methodology Central Vermont Railway Washington County Railroad Vermont Railway Clarendon & Pittsford Railroad Green Mountain Railroad Operational Service Plans Commuter Service Shelbume Road Demonstration Service Amtrak Service Options Tourist Train Service Options Service Linkages Ridership/Patronage/Revenues Forecasting Rail Ridership Estimating Demand for Commuter-Type Service Estimating Demand for Inter-CiService Estimating Demand for Tourist Service Fares and Revenue Projections Ancillary Issues Economic and Environmental Impacts Short and Long-Term Facility and Rolling Stock Needs Train Control, Signaling and Communications Grade Crossings Safety Cost Estimates Capital Costs - Trackwork VERMONT RAIL FEASIBILITY STUDY FINAL REPORT Table of Contents (continued) Section Paae No. Capital Costs - Train Control, Signaling and Communications .Capital Costs - Commuter Stations Capital Costs - Rolling Stock Operating and Maintenance Costs Funding Issues Shelbume Road Demonstration Project Investment in Upgrading the Core Railroad Network Action Plan Shelbume Road Demonstration Project Tourist Train Implementation Preliminary Market Plan Evaluation of Options Amtrak Connections Commuter Service Shelburne Road Demonstration Project Synthesized Service Alternative Synthesized Service Plan 3. FUTURE UTILIZATION OF RAIL INFRASTRUCTURE lntroduction .
    [Show full text]
  • First Safety Safety First
    SAFETY FIRST This TIME TABLE is not intended for the in­ formation of tne pUblic, nor an advertisement of the time or hours of any train. NORTHERN DIVISION The Company reserves the right to vary there­ from as circumstances may require. It is for the government and information of employes only. TIME T BLE All Bulletins issued prior to date of this TIME TABLE conflicting with the instructions herein are cancelled. No.2 READ RULES AND INSTRUCTIONS CAREFULLY FOR EMPLOYES ONLY ON SINGLE TRACK SOUTHWARD TRAINS AS INDICATED BY TIME TABLE HEADING ARE (UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED) SUPERIOR TAKING EFFECT TO TRAINS OF THE SAME OR INFERIOR AT 12:01 A. M. CLASS RUNNING IN THE OPPOSITE DIREC­ TION IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE No. 72. EASTERN STANDARD TIME EVERY EMPLOYEE WHOSE DUTIES ARE CON­ NECTED WITH THE MOVEMENT OF TRAI NS MUST HAVE A COPY OF THE RULES AND OF Sunday, Sept. 28, 1930 THE CURRENT TIME TABLE ACCESSIBLE WHEN ! ON DUTY• ·r• SUPERSEDING TIME TABLE NO. t DATED APRIL 27. 1930 I: STUDY THE SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS AND NOTE ALL CHANGES SAFETY FIRST G. w. GROOM. Superintendent 1 REFERENCES. ers holding tickets from Concord, Bellows Falls and points beyond• • Alexander, Des Rivieres, Milton and Richmond to take passengers holding er, Springfield and beyond. Will stop to leave passengers from points north of h of St. Albans. Will stop at Highgate Springs to leave passenger holding tickets exander to take or leave passengers on Mondays, Wednesdays and Fridays. ivieres to take or leave passengers on Tuesdays, Thursdays and Saturdays. Alexander and Des Rivieres to leave passengers holding tickets from St.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Rail Service the Vermont Way
    DRAFT Regional Rail Service The Vermont Way Authored by Christopher Parker and Carl Fowler November 30, 2017 Contents Contents 2 Executive Summary 4 The Budd Car RDC Advantage 5 Project System Description 6 Routes 6 Schedule 7 Major Employers and Markets 8 Commuter vs. Intercity Designation 10 Project Developer 10 Stakeholders 10 Transportation organizations 10 Town and City Governments 11 Colleges and Universities 11 Resorts 11 Host Railroads 11 Vermont Rail Systems 11 New England Central Railroad 12 Amtrak 12 Possible contract operators 12 Dispatching 13 Liability Insurance 13 Tracks and Right-of-Way 15 Upgraded Track 15 Safety: Grade Crossing Upgrades 15 Proposed Standard 16 Upgrades by segment 16 Cost of Upgrades 17 Safety 19 Platforms and Stations 20 Proposed Stations 20 Existing Stations 22 Construction Methods of New Stations 22 Current and Historical Precedents 25 Rail in Vermont 25 Regional Rail Service in the United States 27 New Mexico 27 Maine 27 Oregon 28 Arizona and Rural New York 28 Rural Massachusetts 28 Executive Summary For more than twenty years various studies have responded to a yearning in Vermont for a regional passenger rail service which would connect Vermont towns and cities. This White Paper, commissioned by Champ P3, LLC reviews the opportunities for and obstacles to delivering rail service at a rural scale appropriate for a rural state. Champ P3 is a mission driven public-private partnership modeled on the Eagle P3 which built Denver’s new commuter rail network. Vermont’s two railroads, Vermont Rail System and Genesee & Wyoming, have experience hosting and operating commuter rail service utilizing Budd cars.
    [Show full text]
  • President Little Schuylkill Navigation Railroad and Coal Compar Dear
    July 3, 1941 Mr. | |, President Little Schuylkill Navigation Railroad and Coal Compar Dear Sir: There has been presented for my consideration the question whether the Little Schuylkill Navigation Railroad and Coal Company is an employer under the Railroad Retirement and Railroad Unemployment Insurance Acts. It appears from information submitted by Mr. I, secretary-treasurer of your company, and from information secured from other sources, that the Little Schuylkill Navigation Rail­ road and Coal Company was incorporated September 14, 1829, under an act of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, for the purpose of making a lock navigation on the East Branch of the Schuylkill River. By special act of April 23, 1831, and supplementary acts, however, the company was authorized to build and operate a railroad instead of a canal. It constructed a railroad, as authorized, and opened it for operation on November IS, 1831. The road was operated directly by the company from that date to April 1, 1863, when the entire road was leased by the company to the Philadelphia and Reading Railroad Company. On December 1, 1896, this lease was terminated and the property was as of that date leased to the Philadelphia and Reading Railway Company, successor to the Philadelphia and Reading Railroad Company, for a period of 999 years. On January 1, 1924, the lease was assumed by the Reading Company, suc­ cessor to the Philadelphia and Reading Railway Company, and the Reading Company has continued since that date to operate the line of railroad of the Little Schuylkill Navigation Railroad and Coal Company in inter­ state commerce, as lessee under that lease.
    [Show full text]
  • Trains 2019 Index
    INDEX TO VOLUME 79 Reproduction of any part of this volume for commercial pur poses is not allowed without the specific permission of the publishers. All contents © 2018 and 2019 by Kalmbach Media Co., Wau kesha, Wis. JANUARY 2019 THROUGH DECEMBER 2019 – 862 PAGES HOW TO USE THIS INDEX: Feature material has been indexed three or more times—once by the title under which it was published, again under the author’s last name, and finally under one or more of the subject categories or railroads. Photographs standing alone are indexed (usually by railroad), but photo graphs within a feature article are not separately indexed. Brief news items are indexed under the appropriate railroad and/or category; news stories are indexed under the appro- priate railroad and/or category and under the author’s last name. Most references to people are indexed under the company with which they are easily identified; if there is no easy identification, they may be indexed under the person’s last name (for deaths, see “Obi t uaries”). Maps, museums, radio frequencies, railroad historical societies, rosters of locomotives and equipment, product reviews, and stations are indexed under these categories. Items from countries other than the U.S. and Canada are indexed under the appropriate country. A Amtrak's elephant style, Ask TRAINS, Mar 62 Aiken Railway: Amtrak’s lost transcons, Jul 22-31 Once upon a time: Seaboard and Southern, Apr 51 Amtrak’s money mystery, Jan 50-55 A tale of two South Carolina short lines, Apr 46-53 At fault: train or track? Passenger, Nov
    [Show full text]
  • Boston-Montreal High Speed Rail Project
    Boston to Montreal High- Speed Rail Planning and Feasibility Study Phase I Final Report prepared for Vermont Agency of Transportation New Hampshire Department of Transportation Massachusetts Executive Office of Transportation and Construction prepared by Parsons Brinckerhoff Quade & Douglas with Cambridge Systematics Fitzgerald and Halliday HNTB, Inc. KKO and Associates April 2003 final report Boston to Montreal High-Speed Rail Planning and Feasibility Study Phase I prepared for Vermont Agency of Transportation New Hampshire Department of Transportation Massachusetts Executive Office of Transportation and Construction prepared by Parsons Brinckerhoff Quade & Douglas with Cambridge Systematics, Inc. Fitzgerald and Halliday HNTB, Inc. KKO and Associates April 2003 Boston to Montreal High-Speed Rail Feasibility Study Table of Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................................................... ES-1 E.1 Background and Purpose of the Study ............................................................... ES-1 E.2 Study Overview...................................................................................................... ES-1 E.3 Ridership Analysis................................................................................................. ES-8 E.4 Government and Policy Issues............................................................................. ES-12 E.5 Conclusion..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Work Has Begun on the Restoration of the Museum's Central Vermont
    Work has begun on the restoration of the museum’s Central Vermont Railway #4052 center cupola caboose. Shown here members inspect the interior of the caboose. March 5, 2007 at 12:30PM history took place when the The caboose should be moved into the roundhouse during first P&W revenue train departed Willimantic, CT in over the next few months. (R.A. LaMay Photo) 20 years. See story inside. (R. A. LaMay Photo) Came across this on the internet a few Vol. 16 Number 2 – April 2007 weeks ago and felt it was funny enough to The next scheduled meeting of the Connecticut Eastern Chapter, National include in the newsletter. One day an engineer calls the Railway Historical Society will be at the P&W Freight Trains Roll Again dispatcher and asks him for the time. The Windham Community Memorial Hospital to and from Willimantic, CT. dispatcher responds by asking him which located at 112 Mansfield Ave., railroad he worked for. The engineer is a Willimantic, CT on By Robert A. LaMay little ticked and snaps “What difference . does that make?” “Well,” the dispatcher Sunday, Apr. 15, 2007 @ 7:00 On March 5, 2007 history took place drawls,’if you work for the BNSF it’s PM when a pair of freight trains exchanged 2PM; if you work for the UP it’s 14 ;00 ; cars and departed for their respective if you work for the NS or CSX the big Please note – monthly business meeting destinations. NECR train 608 arrived in hand is on the12 and the little hand is on will be held on May 6, 2007 at the same command of a pair of ex CN leased the 2; and if you work for Amtrak it’s location at 7:00 PM.
    [Show full text]
  • Whpr19750902-010
    Digitized from Box 15 of the White House Press- Releases at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE September 2, 1975 Office of the White House Press Secretary ------------------------~----------------------------- --------- THE WHITE HOUSE EXECUTIVE ORDER CREATING AN EMERGENCY BOARD TO INVESTIGATE A DISPUTE BETWEEN THE CARRIERS Rl::":PRESENTED BY THE NATIONAL RAILWAY LABOR COi~FERENCE AND CERTAIN OF THEIR EMPLOYEES A dispute exists between the carriers represented by the National Railway Labor Conference, designated in lists attached hereto and made a part hereof, and certain of their employees represented by the Railway Employes' Department, AFL-CIO; International Brotherhood of Boilermakers, Iron Ship Builders, Blacksmiths, Forgers & Helpers; Brotherhood Railway Carmen of United States and Canada; International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers and the International Brotherhood of Firemen & Oilers, This dispute has not heretofore been adjusted under the provisions of the Railway Labor Act, as amended, and This dispute,) in the judgment of the National Ivlediation Board, threatens substantially to interrupt interstate commerce to a degree such as to deprive a section of the country of essential transportation service: NOW, THEREFORE, by virtue of the authority vested in me by Section 10 of the Railway Labor Act, as amended (45 U.S.C. 160), I hereby create a board of three members, to be appointed by me, to investigate this dispute. No member of the board shall be pecuniarily or otherwise / interested in any organization of railroad employees or any carrier. The board shall report its finding to the President with respect to the dispute within 30 days from the date of this Order.
    [Show full text]
  • Gerald R. Ford Administration White House Press Releases
    Digitized from Box 15 of the White House Press Releases at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE September 2. 1975 Office of the White House Press S~cretary ----~-------------------~-------------------------------------- THE WHITE HOUSE EXECUTIVE ORDER " -------" CREATING AN EMERGENCY BOARD TO INVESTIGATE A DISPUTE BETWEEN THE CARRIERS REPRESENTED BY THE NATIONAL RAILWAY LABOR COi-lFERENCE AND CERTAIN OF THEIR EMPLOYEES A dispute exists between the carriers represented by the National Railway Labor Conference, designated in lists attached hereto and made a part" hereof, and certain of their employees represented by the Railway Employes' " Department, AFL-CIO; International Brotherhood of Boilermakers, Iron Ship Builders, Blacksmiths, Forgers & Helpers; Brotherhood Railway Carmen of United States and Canada; International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers and the International Brotherhood of Firemen & Oilers; This dispute has not heretofore been adjusted under the provisions of the Railway Labor Act, as amended, and This dispute, in the j udgm~nt of the National I~ediation Board, threatens substantially to interrupt interstate commerce to a degree such as to deprive a section of the country of essential transportation service: NOW, THEREFORE, by virtue of the authority vested in me by Section 10 of the Railway Labor Act, as amended (45 U.S.C. 160), I hereby create a board of three members, to be appointed by me, to investigate this dispute. No member of the board shall be pecuniarily or otherwise interested in any organization of railroad employees or any carrier. <The board shall report its finding to the President with respect to the dispute within 30 days from the date of this Order.
    [Show full text]
  • N-Scale Master List
    N SCALE DATABASE NEW # OLD # RR NAME OR NAME OF INIT RD # REL MSRP CAR COLOR 020 00 000 20000 Undecorated DATA n/a Nov-72 bcr with white lettering 020 00 000 20000 Dimensional data DATA n/a Mar-73 bcr with white lettering 020 00 001 20001 Dimensional data DATA n/a Nov-02 n/a bcr with white lettering 020 00 006 20006 Nickel Plate Road NKP 8502 Apr-90 $7.80 aluminum with black lettering 020 00 006 n/a Nickel Plate Road NKP 8505 Apr-06 $15.35 aluminum with black lettering 020 00 007 FRIEND New York Central NYC 161500 Mar-17 $26.95 Red with decorated sides 020 00 010 20010 Grand Trunk Western GTW 516798 Nov-72 $7.80 bcr 020 00 010 20010 Grand Trunk Western GTW 516768 Jul-90 $7.80 bcr 020 00 010 20010 Grand Trunk Western GTW 516771 Dec-98 $10.75 bcr 020 00 016 20016 Nickel Plate Road NKP 13456 Jun-90 $7.80 bcr 020 00 017 FRIEND Union Pacific/Arkansas Rice UP 187989 Jul-17 $26.95 Brown with white/yellow 020 00 018 1972 #1 Grand Trunk Western GTW 516772 Nov-14 $19.95 brown with white lettering 020 00 020 20020 Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe ATSF 144537 May-77 bcr 020 00 020 20020 Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe ATSF 144572 Apr-86 bcr 020 00 022 20022 Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe 5- ATSF multi May-77 see individual car listing 020 00 022 20022 Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe 5- ATSF multi Apr-86 see individual car listing 020 00 026 20026 Seaboard Air Line SAL 17075 Sep-90 $8.40 bcr 020 00 027 FRIEND Southern Pacific n/a Sep-17 $26.95 Black with decorated sides 020 00 029 20029 New Haven NH 35149 Dec-72 bcr 020 00 029 20029 New Haven NH 35159 Feb-73 bcr
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Railroad Retirement Board
    FOM1 Art 2 Appendices Appendix A - Prior Service and Red Cap Service Development and Adjudication A1. Prior Service Defined Prior service under the Railroad Retirement Act (RRA) means service performed before 1-1-37. Service performed before 1937 may be credited only if, on 8-29-35, the employee met the conditions for an Employment Relation (ER) described in Appendix C of this chapter. A2. Red Cap Service Defined A person who rendered service as a redcap or other station attendant before 9-1941, and whose duties consisted of carrying hand baggage and assisting passengers’ stations, received credit for all such verified service even though he received no remuneration from an employer for such service. a. 1937 Railroad Retirement Act Under the 1937 Railroad Retirement Act, redcap months prior to 9-1941 were treated as prior service months and the redcap compensation was included in the prior service average. b. Under the 1974 Railroad Retirement Act The 1974 Railroad Retirement Act changed the usage of redcap service and compensation after 12-1936 and before 9-1941; these months were then used as subsequent service. However, the amount of the average redcap compensation for those months was still determined as in 1937 Act cases. A3. Maximum Number of Prior Service or Red Cap Months a. General - The number of months of prior service or red cap service that may be included in an employee's years of service is the difference between 360 and the number of months of creditable service after 1936. The prior service or red cap service months are counted in reverse order beginning with 12-1936 depending upon availability of service records and verification of service.
    [Show full text]
  • Handbook of Canadian Excursion Tours Via Grand Trunk
    . yM^ ^m< HAND-BOOK —OF— Canadian Excursion Tours —VIA— Grand Trunk —AND- Canadian Navigation Co. RATES OF FARE FOR SEASON OF 1878. Tickets and Information may be obtained at No. 280 Washington Street. W. 0. TALLMAN, New Eng. Pass. Agt, N. J. GRACE, Trav. Agent. D. E. W. STONE, Adv. Agt. J. HICKSON, Gen. Manager, G. T. Ry., - - Montreal. t L. J. SEARGEANT, Traffic Manager, G. T. By., - Montreal. Cjj. Fc' ALEX. MILLOY, Sec. and Agent, Canadian Nav. Co. Montreal, fe |^ W. WAINWRIGHT, Gen. Pass. Agt., G.T.Ry., Montreal. E^^^ &@$& " 4085 RAND, AVERY & CO., PRINTERS, 117 FRANKLIN STREET, BOSTON. 10m. 2Sl^ 11 1, 1878. FROM BOSTON. Tourists' Tickets -VIA- New York, Lake George, Philadelphia, Saratoga, Hudson River, White Mountains, Niagara Falls, Frofile House, Toronto, Crawford House, Lake Ontario, Glen House. River St, Lawrence Summit Mt.Wash- • WITH ITS EATIDS AND TEOUSAHD ISLANDS, ington, Montreal, Lake Winnipiseo'e, Quebec, Lake Umbagog, River Saguenay, and the Lake Champlain. Rangeley Lakes. -ALSO- TO CHICAGO AND DETROIT AND RETURN. THIS GRAND TRUNK RAILWAY —IS THE— GREAT THROUGH ROUTE Between the EAST and WEST. Fares from BOSTOX or PORTLAND to CHICAGO and all points West Cheaper than by any other Route. 4®" Full Information Cheerfully GrivEN.-^a XjZST OIF1 EXCURSION ROUTES AND RATES OF FARE FOR Tourists' Tickets for the Season of 1878. TICKETS GOOD UNTIL NOVEMBER 1st. PARTIES holding our Through Excursion Tickets, have choice of routes from Niagara Falls, viz. : via New York Central Railway to Lewiston, and Steamer to Toronto, or Great Western Railway via Ham- ilton to Toronto, connecting there with Grand Trunk Railway, or Royal Mail Line of Steamers passing through " Lake Ontario,'* the " Thousand Islands," and u Rapids of the River St.
    [Show full text]