DOCSLIB.ORG

Whpr19750902-010

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Whpr19750902-010 Digitized from Box 15 of the White House Press- Releases at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE September 2, 1975 Office of the White House Press Secretary ------------------------~----------------------------- --------- THE WHITE HOUSE EXECUTIVE ORDER CREATING AN EMERGENCY BOARD TO INVESTIGATE A DISPUTE BETWEEN THE CARRIERS Rl::":PRESENTED BY THE NATIONAL RAILWAY LABOR COi~FERENCE AND CERTAIN OF THEIR EMPLOYEES A dispute exists between the carriers represented by the National Railway Labor Conference, designated in lists attached hereto and made a part hereof, and certain of their employees represented by the Railway Employes' Department, AFL-CIO; International Brotherhood of Boilermakers, Iron Ship Builders, Blacksmiths, Forgers & Helpers; Brotherhood Railway Carmen of United States and Canada; International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers and the International Brotherhood of Firemen & Oilers, This dispute has not heretofore been adjusted under the provisions of the Railway Labor Act, as amended, and This dispute,) in the judgment of the National Ivlediation Board, threatens substantially to interrupt interstate commerce to a degree such as to deprive a section of the country of essential transportation service: NOW, THEREFORE, by virtue of the authority vested in me by Section 10 of the Railway Labor Act, as amended (45 U.S.C. 160), I hereby create a board of three members, to be appointed by me, to investigate this dispute. No member of the board shall be pecuniarily or otherwise / interested in any organization of railroad employees or any carrier. The board shall report its finding to the President with respect to the dispute within 30 days from the date of this Order. As provided by Section 10 of the Railway Labor Act, as amended, from this date and for 30 days after the board has made its report to the President, no change, except by agreement, shall be made by the carriers represented by the National Railway Labor Conference, or by their employees, in the conditions out of which the dispute arose. IT.ors THE WHITE HOUSE ~eptember 2, 1975 - 2 RAILROADS REPRESENTED BY THE NATIONAL RAILWAY LABOR CONFERENCE Akron, Canton & Youngstown Railroad Company Alameda Belt Line Alton & Southern Railway Company *Ann Arbor Railroad Company Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Company Atlanta and West Point Rail Road Company, The Western Railway of Alabama Atlanta Joint Terminals Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Company, including The Staten Island Railroad Corporation Baltimore and Ohio Chicago Terminal Railroad Company Bangor and Aroostook Railroad Company Belt Railway Company of Chicago @Bessemer and Lake Erie Railroad Company *Boston and Maine Corporation Burlington Northern Inc. Butte, Anaconda & Pacific Railway Company Camas Prairie Railroad Company Canadian National Railways ­ Great Lakes Region, Lines in the United States St. Lawrence Region, Lines in the United States #Canadian Pacific Limited Central of Georgia Railroad Company *Central Railroad Company of New Jersey New York and Long Branch Railroad Company Central Vermont Railway, Inc. Chesapeake and Ohio Railway Company Chicago & Eastern Illinois Railroad Chicago & Illinois Midland Railway Company Chicago and North Western Transportation Company Chicago and western Indiana Railroad Company Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul and Pacific Railroad Company Chicago River and Indiana Railroad Company 'Chicago, Rock Island and Pacific Railroad Company Chicago South Shore and South Bend Railroad Chicago Union Station Company Chicago, West Pullman and Southern Railroad Company Cleveland Union Terminals Company Clinchfield Railroad Company Colorado & Wyoming Railway Company Davenport, Rock Island and North Western Railway Company Dayton Union Railway Company Delaware and Hudson Railway Company Denver and Rio Grande Western Railroad Company Des Moines Union Railway Company Detroit and Toledo Shore Line Railroad #Detroit & Mackinac Railway Detroit, Toledo & Ironton Railroad Company @Duluth, Missabe and Iron Range Railway Company Duluth, Winnipeg & Pacific Railway Company Elgin, Joliet and Eastern Railway Company 'Erie Lackawanna Railway Company Fort Worth and Denver Railway Company Georgia Railroad Grand Trunk Western Railroad Company Green Bay and Western Railroad Company Houston Belt & Terminal Railway Company more - 3 Illinois Central Gulf Railroad Company Illinois Terminal Railroad Company Indiana Harbor Belt Railroad Company Indianapolis Union Railway Company Jacksonville Terminal Company Joint Texas Division of the CRI&P RR. and FW&D Ry. Kansas City Southern Railway Company Kansas City Terminal Railway Company Kentucky & Indiana Terminal Railroad Company #Lake Superior and Ishpeming Railroad Lake Superior Terminal and Transfer Railway Company ·Lehigh and Hudson River Railway Company Lehigh and New England Railway ·Lehigh Valley Railroad Los Angeles Junction Railway Company Louisiana & Arkansas Railway Company Louisville and Nashville Railroad Company Maine Central Railroad Company Portland Terminal Company I'4anufacturers Railway Company #Merchants Despatch Transportation Company Minneapolis, Northfield. and Southern Railway Minnesota Transfer Railway Company Missouri-Kansas-Texas Railroad Company Missouri Pacific Railroad Company Missouri-Illinois'Railroad Company Monongahela Railway Company rllontour Railroad' Company @Newburgh and South Shore Railway Company New Orleans Public Belt Railroad New Orleans U~ion Passenger Terminal Mew York, Susquehanna and Western Railroad Company Norfolk and Portsmouth Belt Line Railroad Company Norfolk and Western Railway Company @Northampton and Bath Railroad Company Northwestern Pacific Railroad Company Oakland Terminal Railway *·Penn Central Transportation Company Pennsylvania-Reading Seashore Lines Peoria and Pekin Union Railway Company Pittsburgh and Lake Erie Railroad Company Portland Terminal Railroad Company Port Terminal Railroad Association Quanah, Acme and Pacific Railway Company *Reading Company @ - Philadelphia~ Reading & Pottsville Telegraph Company Richmond~ Fredericksburg and Potomac Railroad Company River Terminal Railway Company St. Joseph Terminal Railroad Company St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Company St. Louis Southwestern Railway Company Saint Paul Union Depot Company San Diego and Arizona Eastern Railway Company Seaboard Coast Line Railroad Company Soo Line Railroad Company Southern Pacific Transportation Company ­ Pacific Lines and Texas and Louisiana Lines Southern Railway Company Alabama Great Southern Railroad Company Cincinnati~ New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railway Company Georgia Southern and Florida Railway Company New Orleans Terminal Company St. Johns River Terminal Company more 4 Staten Island Railroad Corporation Terminal Railroad Association of St. Louis Texas and Pacific Railway Company Texas Mexican Railway Company Texas Pacific-Missouri Pacific Terminal Railroad of New Orleans Toledo, Peoria and Western Railroad Company Toledo Terminal Railroad Company Union Depot Company, Columbus, Ohio Union Pacific Railroad Company Union Terminal Railway-St. Joseph Belt Railway Washington Terminal Company Western Maryland Railway Company Western Pacific Railroad Company #Yakima Valley Transportation Company @Youngstown and Northern Railroad Company NOTES: * - Subject to the approval of the Courts. ** - Subject to the approval of the Trustees of the Property and to the approval of the Courts. The Trustees have approved. # - Authorization covers negotiation of the organizations' Aug. 1, 1974 notice, only. @- Authorization covers negotiation of the organizations' separate notices dated July 1, 1974, only. # # # # .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Vermont Rail Feasibility Study
    Vermont Rail Feasibility study Vermont Agency of Transportation Final Report March 1993 Submitted by LS Transit Systems, Inc. In association with R.L. Banks & Associates, Inc. Resource Systems Group, Inc. CGA Consulting Services VERMONT RAIL FEASIBILITY STUDY FINAL REPORT Table of Contents Section Paae No. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Background Rail Services Considered Passenger Rail Feasibility Capital, Operating and Maintenance Costs Environmental lmpacts Evaluation of Options Shelburne Road Demonstration Project Synthesized Service Alternative Conclusions and Recommendations 1. INTRODUCTION Background Passenger Rail Service Freight Rail Service Policy Issues 2. PASSENGER RAIL FEASIBILITY Introduction Physical Inventory lntroduction Methodology Central Vermont Railway Washington County Railroad Vermont Railway Clarendon & Pittsford Railroad Green Mountain Railroad Operational Service Plans Commuter Service Shelbume Road Demonstration Service Amtrak Service Options Tourist Train Service Options Service Linkages Ridership/Patronage/Revenues Forecasting Rail Ridership Estimating Demand for Commuter-Type Service Estimating Demand for Inter-CiService Estimating Demand for Tourist Service Fares and Revenue Projections Ancillary Issues Economic and Environmental Impacts Short and Long-Term Facility and Rolling Stock Needs Train Control, Signaling and Communications Grade Crossings Safety Cost Estimates Capital Costs - Trackwork VERMONT RAIL FEASIBILITY STUDY FINAL REPORT Table of Contents (continued) Section Paae No. Capital Costs - Train Control, Signaling and Communications .Capital Costs - Commuter Stations Capital Costs - Rolling Stock Operating and Maintenance Costs Funding Issues Shelbume Road Demonstration Project Investment in Upgrading the Core Railroad Network Action Plan Shelbume Road Demonstration Project Tourist Train Implementation Preliminary Market Plan Evaluation of Options Amtrak Connections Commuter Service Shelburne Road Demonstration Project Synthesized Service Alternative Synthesized Service Plan 3. FUTURE UTILIZATION OF RAIL INFRASTRUCTURE lntroduction .
    [Show full text]
  • BSRA 2014-06-07 Entertainment Report
    BSRA Entertainment Report for June 7, 2014 LONG FORM (for historical record) Entertainment Report for June 7, 2014 June 7, 2014. Key System & Sacramento Northern. Clark Frazier presented a visual tour of the electric suburban Key System Transbay lines from San Francisco (connecting to the surviving Municipal Railway streetcar lines) to Oakland and Berkeley from 1956 to 1958, and then the freight-only electrified Sacramento Northern during the same time period. Most of these slides were from a Winterail show in California in 2002, but we got to see additional slides after the Winterail slides.. We started with a map of the Key System, which was a privately owned company formed from consolidating several streetcar systems and a realty company (Realty Syndicate of Francis "Borax" Smith and Frank C. Havens, which built and ran such properties as the Claremont Hotel which survives today as Claremont Resort), and then taken over by National City Lines in 1948. Before seeing the Key System itself, we saw some photos of the Bridge Terminal area, including Bridge Terminal itself (eventually named Transbay Terminal, and finally closed in 2010 for replacement with a new facility), which was the San Francisco terminal of the Key System and for a short period also the Southern Pacific (by way of its subsidiary East Bay Electric) and the Sacramento Northern, and then some modern photos of some of the San Francisco Municipal Railway's heritage streetcars running on the Market Street (Muni F) line, followed by some views of Muni streetcar service from the time period we would see covered for the Key System: 1956 to 1958.
    [Show full text]
  • First Safety Safety First
    SAFETY FIRST This TIME TABLE is not intended for the in­ formation of tne pUblic, nor an advertisement of the time or hours of any train. NORTHERN DIVISION The Company reserves the right to vary there­ from as circumstances may require. It is for the government and information of employes only. TIME T BLE All Bulletins issued prior to date of this TIME TABLE conflicting with the instructions herein are cancelled. No.2 READ RULES AND INSTRUCTIONS CAREFULLY FOR EMPLOYES ONLY ON SINGLE TRACK SOUTHWARD TRAINS AS INDICATED BY TIME TABLE HEADING ARE (UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED) SUPERIOR TAKING EFFECT TO TRAINS OF THE SAME OR INFERIOR AT 12:01 A. M. CLASS RUNNING IN THE OPPOSITE DIREC­ TION IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE No. 72. EASTERN STANDARD TIME EVERY EMPLOYEE WHOSE DUTIES ARE CON­ NECTED WITH THE MOVEMENT OF TRAI NS MUST HAVE A COPY OF THE RULES AND OF Sunday, Sept. 28, 1930 THE CURRENT TIME TABLE ACCESSIBLE WHEN ! ON DUTY• ·r• SUPERSEDING TIME TABLE NO. t DATED APRIL 27. 1930 I: STUDY THE SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS AND NOTE ALL CHANGES SAFETY FIRST G. w. GROOM. Superintendent 1 REFERENCES. ers holding tickets from Concord, Bellows Falls and points beyond• • Alexander, Des Rivieres, Milton and Richmond to take passengers holding er, Springfield and beyond. Will stop to leave passengers from points north of h of St. Albans. Will stop at Highgate Springs to leave passenger holding tickets exander to take or leave passengers on Mondays, Wednesdays and Fridays. ivieres to take or leave passengers on Tuesdays, Thursdays and Saturdays. Alexander and Des Rivieres to leave passengers holding tickets from St.
    [Show full text]
  • Resent: Maryland Railway Robert B.Hoover
    Reflections on the Western resent: Maryland Railway Robert B.Hoover S THE BLACKTOPbends and winds through the hills,the railroad's — A bridges deck-plate girder bridges painted black or a fading silver-gray — appear suddenly, come at you, and then loom overhead at angles as you pass on the road below. Bigwhite "speed-lettering" on the bridges announce WESTERN MARYLANDRAILWAY.Then they angle away once more, crossing the line of the Baltimore &Ohio Railroad, rivers, and entire valleys. There isno mistaking that this railroad had purpose, and its viaduct looms even larger than life,dominating the lush gold and green fallin the Casselman River Valley, which stretches out allaround me; husky, faded green-painted steel girders stride across the valley; then at the end of the bridge, far offfrom the line ofsight: a cut in the hillside. Standing on the eastern edge ofwhat was once the railroad's Salisbury Viaduct near Meyersdale insouth-central Pennsylvania, Istand atop a giant monument to the past. There willbe no trains running on this bridge today, or any other day, or ever again. Ina few years, bicyclists and joggers and hikers willpartake ofthe remote and wildviews ofthe Casselman and Youghiogheny valleys previously enjoyed onlyby trainmen and trespassers likeme. For the last 12 years, Robert B.Hoover is a paralegal withStrassburger McKenna Gutnick &Potter. He grew up inZelienople and has been interested inrailroads ever since. 27 after a chance encounter on an abandoned trestle outside of the footage, as a small child,riding the scale steam train at the Connellsville,inFayette County, Pa., Ihave slowly, thoughtfully, company's Pen-Mar amusement park in the summer of 1940.
    [Show full text]
  • California State Rail Plan 2005-06 to 2015-16
    California State Rail Plan 2005-06 to 2015-16 December 2005 California Department of Transportation ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, Governor SUNNE WRIGHT McPEAK, Secretary Business, Transportation and Housing Agency WILL KEMPTON, Director California Department of Transportation JOSEPH TAVAGLIONE, Chair STATE OF CALIFORNIA ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER JEREMIAH F. HALLISEY, Vice Chair GOVERNOR BOB BALGENORTH MARIAN BERGESON JOHN CHALKER JAMES C. GHIELMETTI ALLEN M. LAWRENCE R. K. LINDSEY ESTEBAN E. TORRES SENATOR TOM TORLAKSON, Ex Officio ASSEMBLYMEMBER JENNY OROPEZA, Ex Officio JOHN BARNA, Executive Director CALIFORNIA TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION 1120 N STREET, MS-52 P. 0 . BOX 942873 SACRAMENTO, 94273-0001 FAX(916)653-2134 (916) 654-4245 http://www.catc.ca.gov December 29, 2005 Honorable Alan Lowenthal, Chairman Senate Transportation and Housing Committee State Capitol, Room 2209 Sacramento, CA 95814 Honorable Jenny Oropeza, Chair Assembly Transportation Committee 1020 N Street, Room 112 Sacramento, CA 95814 Dear: Senator Lowenthal Assembly Member Oropeza: On behalf of the California Transportation Commission, I am transmitting to the Legislature the 10-year California State Rail Plan for FY 2005-06 through FY 2015-16 by the Department of Transportation (Caltrans) with the Commission's resolution (#G-05-11) giving advice and consent, as required by Section 14036 of the Government Code. The ten-year plan provides Caltrans' vision for intercity rail service. Caltrans'l0-year plan goals are to provide intercity rail as an alternative mode of transportation, promote congestion relief, improve air quality, better fuel efficiency, and improved land use practices. This year's Plan includes: standards for meeting those goals; sets priorities for increased revenues, increased capacity, reduced running times; and cost effectiveness.
    [Show full text]
  • Records Relating to Railroads in the Cartographic Section of the National Archives
    REFERENCE INFORMATION PAPER 116 Records Relating to Railroads in the Cartographic Section of the national archives 1 Records Relating to Railroads in the Cartographic Section of the National Archives REFERENCE INFORMATION PAPER 116 National Archives and Records Administration, Washington, DC Compiled by Peter F. Brauer 2010 United States. National Archives and Records Administration. Records relating to railroads in the cartographic section of the National Archives / compiled by Peter F. Brauer.— Washington, DC : National Archives and Records Administration, 2010. p. ; cm.— (Reference information paper ; no 116) includes index. 1. United States. National Archives and Records Administration. Cartographic and Architectural Branch — Catalogs. 2. Railroads — United States — Armed Forces — History —Sources. 3. United States — Maps — Bibliography — Catalogs. I. Brauer, Peter F. II. Title. Cover: A section of a topographic quadrangle map produced by the U.S. Geological Survey showing the Union Pacific Railroad’s Bailey Yard in North Platte, Nebraska, 1983. The Bailey Yard is the largest railroad classification yard in the world. Maps like this one are useful in identifying the locations and names of railroads throughout the United States from the late 19th into the 21st century. (Topographic Quadrangle Maps—1:24,000, NE-North Platte West, 1983, Record Group 57) table of contents Preface vii PART I INTRODUCTION ix Origins of Railroad Records ix Selection Criteria xii Using This Guide xiii Researching the Records xiii Guides to Records xiv Related
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Rail Service the Vermont Way
    DRAFT Regional Rail Service The Vermont Way Authored by Christopher Parker and Carl Fowler November 30, 2017 Contents Contents 2 Executive Summary 4 The Budd Car RDC Advantage 5 Project System Description 6 Routes 6 Schedule 7 Major Employers and Markets 8 Commuter vs. Intercity Designation 10 Project Developer 10 Stakeholders 10 Transportation organizations 10 Town and City Governments 11 Colleges and Universities 11 Resorts 11 Host Railroads 11 Vermont Rail Systems 11 New England Central Railroad 12 Amtrak 12 Possible contract operators 12 Dispatching 13 Liability Insurance 13 Tracks and Right-of-Way 15 Upgraded Track 15 Safety: Grade Crossing Upgrades 15 Proposed Standard 16 Upgrades by segment 16 Cost of Upgrades 17 Safety 19 Platforms and Stations 20 Proposed Stations 20 Existing Stations 22 Construction Methods of New Stations 22 Current and Historical Precedents 25 Rail in Vermont 25 Regional Rail Service in the United States 27 New Mexico 27 Maine 27 Oregon 28 Arizona and Rural New York 28 Rural Massachusetts 28 Executive Summary For more than twenty years various studies have responded to a yearning in Vermont for a regional passenger rail service which would connect Vermont towns and cities. This White Paper, commissioned by Champ P3, LLC reviews the opportunities for and obstacles to delivering rail service at a rural scale appropriate for a rural state. Champ P3 is a mission driven public-private partnership modeled on the Eagle P3 which built Denver’s new commuter rail network. Vermont’s two railroads, Vermont Rail System and Genesee & Wyoming, have experience hosting and operating commuter rail service utilizing Budd cars.
    [Show full text]
  • History of the Pere Marquette Railway
    History of the Pere Marquette Railway Local History at the St. Thomas Public Library 1900: The Pere Marquette Railroad (PM) is formed by merging three small railroads in the United States: Chicago & West Michigan; Flint & Pere Marquette; and the Detroit, Grand Rapids & Western Railways. The PM is named after Père Jacques Marquette, the French Jesuit missionary who founded Michigan’s first European settlement, Sault St. Marie. 1901: Car ferry Pere Marquette 17 is placed in Lake Michigan service. The PM used car ferries on Lake Michigan to avoid the terminal and interchange delays in the area. Later, they were used on Lake Erie, the Detroit River, and in Port Huron. Car Ferry Pere Marquette 17 1902: Car ferry (first) Pere Marquette 18 is placed into Lake Michigan service. January 1903: PM acquires the Lake Erie & Detroit River Railway (LE&DRR), with main lines running from Walkerville, Windsor to St. Thomas, Ontario, as well as from Sarnia to Chatham and Erieau. This begins the Pere Marquette’s presence in Canada. 1904: The Pere Marquette secures running rights from Buffalo, New York and Niagara Falls, New York over the Canadian Southern railway lines to reach St. Thomas, where the PM’s main Canadian facilities will be located. 1905: Shop facilities are constructed in St. Thomas. December 1905: The first receivership begins, meaning that the company is controlled by others in order to make the best decision based on its finances, whether that is stabilizing or selling the company. The Pere Marquette has struggled financially for much of its operating life, and will continue to do so.
    [Show full text]
  • DEC 0 1 2003 Termination of Coverage
    B.C.D. 08-45.27 EMPLOYER STATUS DETERMINATION DEC 0 1 2003 Termination of Coverage This is the determination of the Railroad Retirement Board concerning the continued coverage as employers under the Railroad Retirement Act (45 U.S.C. § 231 et seq.) (RRA) and the Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act (45 U.S.C. § 351 et seq.) (RUIA) of 45 covered entities. The Board’s Audit and Compliance Section has identified these 45 employers which were never assigned a BA number. These entities were formerly operated by a covered rail carrier employer or formerly provided creditable service to a covered employer. In each case, the railroad operator or service recipient no longer operates and has been terminated as a covered employer. Since the operating/service recipient companies have ceased railroad or rail related operations and, in many instances, have ceased to exist, and no railroad or rail related operation is conducted by or on behalf of any of these 45 entities, their employer status is terminated as explained in more detail below. Union Lumber Company Service for Union Lumber Company was credited to the California Western Railroad and Navigation Company (BA Number 2703), which was a covered employer from June 30, 1905 to January 1, 1948, when its name was changed to California Western Railroad. California Western Railroad retained BA Number 2703 and was a covered employer until it ceased operations June 30, 1976. The Board’s records indicate that the service of train and engine crews engaged in the operation of the logging railroad of Union Lumber Company was creditable as service to the California Western Railroad & Navigation Company from December 1, 1917.
    [Show full text]
  • Lehigh Valley Railroad Company Records 1917
    Lehigh Valley Railroad Company records 1917 This finding aid was produced using ArchivesSpace on September 26, 2021. Description is written in: English. Describing Archives: A Content Standard Manuscripts and Archives PO Box 3630 Wilmington, Delaware 19807 [email protected] URL: http://www.hagley.org/library Lehigh Valley Railroad Company records 1917 Table of Contents Summary Information .................................................................................................................................... 3 Historical Note ............................................................................................................................................... 3 Scope and Contents ........................................................................................................................................ 5 Arrangement ................................................................................................................................................... 5 Administrative Information ............................................................................................................................ 5 Related Materials ........................................................................................................................................... 6 Controlled Access Headings .......................................................................................................................... 6 - Page 2 - Lehigh Valley Railroad Company records 1917 Summary Information Repository:
    [Show full text]
  • Page 1 of 8 PHILIP G. CRAIG 204 FERNWOOD AVENUE UPPER MONTCLAIR, NEW JERSEY 07043-1905 USA Mobile/Cell: (001) 973-787-4642 Emai
    PHILIP G. CRAIG 204 FERNWOOD AVENUE UPPER MONTCLAIR, NEW JERSEY 07043-1905 USA Mobile/Cell: (001) 973-787-4642 Email: [email protected] RESUME Summary Phil Craig has 50 years of experience in the rail transit and railroad field. My expertise is in planning, design, construction, and operation of heavy rail rapid transit systems (metros or subways), light rail transit systems, suburban or regional (commuter) rail systems, high-speed passenger railways, and main line passenger and freight railroads. My broad technical knowledge as a transportation planner and analyst encompasses a wide range of planning, operations, and management areas. I have held significant management positions with transport organizations serving large metropolitan areas in the United States, Great Britain and Greece, as well having been a consultant on rail projects in Canada, India, South Korea, Taiwan and Turkey. Education Bachelor of Science (Cum Laude), Public Utilities and Transportation, New York University, New York, New York, 1963 Professional Data Past Chairman (1973-76) and Committee Member (1972-80), Subcommittee on Federal Rules and Regulations Committee on Mobility for the Elderly and Handicapped American Public Transit Association, Washington, D.C., USA Member, Light Rail Transit Association, London, England Member, Light Rail Panel, New Jersey Association of Railroad Passengers Experience Independent Transportation Consultant – March 2009 to July 2009 Project: Honolulu High Capacity Transit Corridor Project, Honolulu, O'ahu, Hawai'i Clients: Kamehameha Schools and Honolulu Chapter of American Institute of Architects Assignment: Analyze Potential for Use of Light Rail Transit Technology Roles: Consultant to Kamehameha Schools and Adviser to AIA Honolulu Prepared a Light Rail Transit Feasibility Report for Kamehameha Schools/Bishop Estate (the largest private landholder in the Hawaiian Islands).
    [Show full text]
  • ENTERED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT July 06, 2018 SOUTHERN DISTRICT of TEXAS David J
    Case 5:18-cv-00071 Document 27 Filed in TXSD on 07/06/18 Page 1 of 15 United States District Court Southern District of Texas ENTERED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT July 06, 2018 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS David J. Bradley, Clerk LAREDO DIVISION THE KANSAS CITY SOUTHERN § RAILWAY COMPANY, et al., § § Plaintiffs, § VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:18-CV-71 § BROTHERHOOD OF LOCOMOTIVE § ENGINEERS AND TRAINMEN, et al., § § Defendants. § MEMORANDUM & ORDER The plaintiffs in this case—The Kansas City Southern Railway Company (KCSR) and The Texas Mexican Railway Company (Tex-Mex) (collectively, “the Railroads”)—are a pair of railway companies that operate, at least in part, in South Texas. Defendant Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen (the Union) is a labor union that represents the Railroads’ employees. Defendant Chris Heise is the Union’s general chairman. This case arises from a dispute over whether the Railroads are entitled to shift their point of interchange for trains that cross the U.S.-Mexico border from the border itself to a rail yard nine miles away in Laredo, Texas. The Union argues that the collective bargaining agreements (CBAs) between the parties do not allow the Railroads to make this change. The Union also argues that the change would run afoul of certain administrative-agency orders and regulations. The Railroads disagree with the Union’s arguments in every respect and say that they intend to shift their point of interchange from the border to the Laredo rail yard on July 9, 2018. The Union has threatened to strike in response. Pending before the Court is the Railroads’ “Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and/or Preliminary Injunction.” (Dkt.
    [Show full text]