DOCSLIB.ORG

Statewide Transportation Improvement Program: Federal Fiscal Years 2012-2013-2014-2015 Maine Department of Transportation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Statewide Transportation Improvement Program: Federal Fiscal Years 2012-2013-2014-2015 Maine Department of Transportation Maine State Library Digital Maine Transportation Documents Transportation 10-1-2011 Statewide Transportation Improvement Program: Federal Fiscal Years 2012-2013-2014-2015 Maine Department of Transportation Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalmaine.com/mdot_docs Recommended Citation Maine Department of Transportation, "Statewide Transportation Improvement Program: Federal Fiscal Years 2012-2013-2014-2015 " (2011). Transportation Documents. 52. https://digitalmaine.com/mdot_docs/52 This Text is brought to you for free and open access by the Transportation at Digital Maine. It has been accepted for inclusion in Transportation Documents by an authorized administrator of Digital Maine. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Maine Department of Transportation Statewide Transportation Improvement Program Federal Fiscal Years 2012-2013-2014-2015 Effective October 01, 2011 Prepared by The Maine Department of Transportation Bureau of Transportation Systems Planning Statewide Transportation Improvement Program Federal Fiscal Years 2012-2013-2014-2015 PREFACE: What is a STIP………………………………………….………….……………………..i TABLE OF CONTENTS: I. Introduction……………………………………………………………………….....2 II. STIP, Public Involvement and the MaineDOT Capital Work Plan…………..……..3 III. STIP Finances…………………………………………………………………..…....4 IV. Operation and Maintenance…………………………………………………….....…5 V. Air Quality Conformity Determination………………………………………..…......6 STIP DOCUMENT: Section I – Federal Highway Administration - Fund Source Obligation Summary • Summary by fund source, by fiscal year of obligation • Listing of individual projects, alphabetically by municipality Section II – Federal Transit Administration - Fund Source Obligation Summary • Summary by fund source and the fiscal year of obligation • Listing of individual projects, alphabetically by municipality Section III – Indian Reservation Roads Program and Eastern Federal Lands Division Program • Listing of individual projects grouped by project number Section IV – Other Projects of Significance • Summary by fund source, by fiscal year of obligation • Listing of individual projects, alphabetically by municipality Section V - Appendices • Glossary of Terms • Statewide Transportation Planning Self-Certification • Metropolitan Planning Organization - TIP Approval Letters • Metropolitan Planning Organization – Self-Certifications Preface: What is the STIP? The Statewide Transportation Improvement Plan (STIP) is a four year, federally required, transportation capital improvement program. Federal regulations require each state to produce a STIP that identifies federal funding by year for scheduled transportation projects receiving Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) or Federal Transit Administration (FTA) funding. MaineDOT produces a STIP every two years to meet the following requirements: • The State of Maine must show fiscal constraint by not scheduling more transportation projects for construction, per year, than it can reasonably expect to receive in funding. • To certify that the State’s transportation program conforms to Federal air quality regulations. • To provide all interested parties a reasonable opportunity to comment on the proposed STIP. MaineDOT also produces a State-initiated biennial Capital Work Plan that lists all potential projects during an upcoming two-year period. The majority of the projects listed in the Capital Work Plan are funded by FHWA and FTA. The STIP is a fiscally constrained document that is formally submitted to the federal agencies, and lists the FHWA and FTA projects that are to be funded over the next four years. The STIP is a federally mandated document that must be approved by federal agencies in order for Maine to receive FHWA and FTA funding. Federal regulations related to the STIP apply equally to all 50 states. They do not take into account individual states’ sizes, legislative processes or budget cycles. Maine has a biennial state budget cycle, and most of Maine's transportation projects are completed within two construction seasons. However, federal agencies require a STIP that covers a four-year federal funding cycle. To meet this requirement, this STIP provides a potential funding scenario for federal fiscal years 2014 and 2015, and potential investments for this time period, based primarily on historical funding in recent years. Please note that the additional two years of potential project information is provided in an effort to meet the federal requirement, and does not represent any policy commitment by MaineDOT. In early calendar year 2013, MaineDOT will submit specific projects to the Maine legislature concurrent with the State 2014-2015 budget cycle. These projects will be enumerated in the state fiscal year 2014-2015 Capital Work Plan, and will supersede the investments listed in this document. i I. Introduction The Maine Department of Transportation (MaineDOT) Bureau of Transportation Systems Planning (BTSP) coordinated the development and preparation of this document with support from other bureaus and offices throughout MaineDOT. The Maine Statewide Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) is prepared every two years as directed by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and the Federal Transit Administration (FTA). The document presented here begins on October 01, 2011, and spans Federal Fiscal Years 2012, 2013, 2014 and 2015. The STIP is a multimodal document that includes investments in facilities for various modes of transportation, such as; pedestrian, bicycles, highways and transit services. The STIP is the means for implementing the goals and objectives identified in the Department’s Long Range Plan. MaineDOT develops the STIP in cooperation with the four Maine Metropolitan Planning Organizations, Maine municipalities and in consultation with 11 Regional Councils. This STIP has been developed based on the Clean Air Amendments of 1990 and all regulations issued pursuant thereto, and the terms and provisions in the Safe Accountable Flexible Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU). SAFETEA-LU expired at the end of Federal Fiscal Year 2009, and Maine has received surface transportation funding through a series of continuing resolutions. In the event that a future funding act is significantly different than SAFETEA-LU, or significant changes are made to SAFETEA-LU, MaineDOT may need to revise the STIP. Section I includes projects anticipated to be funded with FHWA resources. Section II contains projects proposed for funding with FTA resources, and the anticipated funding transfers from the FHWA to FTA. Section III lists the Indian Reservation Roads Program and Eastern Federal Lands Division Program projects. Section IV contains other significant projects that are not currently proposed to be funded with resources from FHWA or FTA. These projects are included to satisfy the public participation requirements should MaineDOT wish to use federal resources for them at some point in the future. Section V contains the appendices for the STIP document. Additional copies of the STIP may be obtained by contacting David Oakes in the Bureau of Transportation Systems Planning at (207) 624-3300 or by email at [email protected]. The STIP can be found online at www.maine.gov/mdot. 1 II. STIP, Public Involvement and the MaineDOT Capital Work Plan The STIP document is published as a stand-alone federal document. All projects listed in the STIP have been through a significant public involvement process, and are closely linked to the preparation of MaineDOT’s biennial Capital Work Plan. In support of MaineDOT’s biennial budget request, prior to preparing a STIP, MaineDOT submits the Capital Work Plan to the Maine State Legislature. All projects that are included in the STIP have been represented in a MaineDOT Capital Work Plan and/or have received federal approval through inclusion in a prior STIP or as an amendment to a prior STIP. The 2012-2013 Capital Work Plan contains; the process for the selection of projects, a comprehensive description regarding MaineDOT’s public involvement process in transportation programming and a more detailed discussion of state and federal transportation funding than the STIP document. The 2012-2013 Capital Work Plan and the 2012-2015 STIP are companion publications, and parties that are interested in more detailed information regarding MaineDOT’s transportation programming should refer to the 2012-2013 Capital Work Plan document available at www.maine.gov/mdot. 2 III. STIP Finances There are three sources of funds for transportation programming, which are discussed in more detail in MaineDOT’s 2012-2013 Capital Work Plan available at www.maine.gov/mdot. The three sources of funding are: • Federal transportation funding • State transportation funding • Limited local or private funding Section 1 (FHWA) in the attached document provides the estimated utilization of federal funding, by fund source, for each one of the four years of the STIP/TIP. The chart below shows recent FHWA Obligation Authority received by Maine. The chart accounts for the fact that Maine currently has almost $95 million remaining in Federal Fiscal Year 2011 Obligation Authority. Therefore; fiscal constraint is demonstrated in Section l of this document for the FHWA program. In order to meet the obligations, as proposed in Section l, MaineDOT will be requesting transfers between apportioned highway programs, authorized under statues; 23 U.S.C. 104 (g), 126 (a) (b) and (c) and 144 (e). Historic FHWA Obligation
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Toll Roads in the United States: History and Current Policy
    TOLL FACILITIES IN THE UNITED STATES Bridges - Roads - Tunnels - Ferries August 2009 Publication No: FHWA-PL-09-00021 Internet: http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ohim/tollpage.htm Toll Roads in the United States: History and Current Policy History The early settlers who came to America found a land of dense wilderness, interlaced with creeks, rivers, and streams. Within this wilderness was an extensive network of trails, many of which were created by the migration of the buffalo and used by the Native American Indians as hunting and trading routes. These primitive trails were at first crooked and narrow. Over time, the trails were widened, straightened and improved by settlers for use by horse and wagons. These became some of the first roads in the new land. After the American Revolution, the National Government began to realize the importance of westward expansion and trade in the development of the new Nation. As a result, an era of road building began. This period was marked by the development of turnpike companies, our earliest toll roads in the United States. In 1792, the first turnpike was chartered and became known as the Philadelphia and Lancaster Turnpike in Pennsylvania. It was the first road in America covered with a layer of crushed stone. The boom in turnpike construction began, resulting in the incorporation of more than 50 turnpike companies in Connecticut, 67 in New York, and others in Massachusetts and around the country. A notable turnpike, the Boston-Newburyport Turnpike, was 32 miles long and cost approximately $12,500 per mile to construct. As the Nation grew, so did the need for improved roads.
    [Show full text]
  • The Patapsco Regional Greenway the Patapsco Regional Greenway
    THE PATAPSCO REGIONAL GREENWAY THE PATAPSCO REGIONAL GREENWAY ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS While the Patapsco Regional Greenway Concept Plan and Implementation Matrix is largely a community effort, the following individuals should be recognized for their input and contribution. Mary Catherine Cochran, Patapsco Heritage Greenway Dan Hudson, Maryland Department of Natural Resources Rob Dyke, Maryland Park Service Joe Vogelpohl, Maryland Park Service Eric Crawford, Friends of Patapsco Valley State Park and Mid-Atlantic Off-Road Enthusiasts (MORE) Ed Dixon, MORE Chris Eatough, Howard County Office of Transportation Tim Schneid, Baltimore Gas & Electric Pat McDougall, Baltimore County Recreation & Parks Molly Gallant, Baltimore City Recreation & Parks Nokomis Ford, Carroll County Department of Planning The Patapsco Regional Greenway 2 THE PATAPSCO REGIONAL GREENWAY TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION .................................................4 2 BENEFITS OF WALKING AND BICYCLING ...............14 3 EXISTING PLANS ...............................................18 4 TREATMENTS TOOLKIT .......................................22 5 GREENWAY MAPS .............................................26 6 IMPLEMENTATION MATRIX .................................88 7 FUNDING SOURCES ...........................................148 8 CONCLUSION ....................................................152 APPENDICES ........................................................154 Appendix A: Community Feedback .......................................155 Appendix B: Survey
    [Show full text]
  • Advancing Racial Equity Through Highway Reconstruction
    VANDERBILT LAW REVIEW ________________________________________________________________________ VOLUME 73 OCTOBER 2020 NUMBER 5 ________________________________________________________________________ ARTICLES “White Men’s Roads Through Black Men’s Homes”*: Advancing Racial Equity Through Highway Reconstruction Deborah N. Archer** Racial and economic segregation in urban communities is often understood as a natural consequence of poor choices by individuals. In reality, racially and economically segregated cities are the result of many factors, * “White men’s roads through black men’s homes” was the mantra of a coalition led by Reginald M. Booker and Sammie Abbott in opposition to highway development in Washington, D.C. See Harry Jaffe, The Insane Highway Plan that Would Have Bulldozed DC’s Most Charming Neighborhoods, WASHINGTONIAN (Oct. 21, 2015), https://www.washingtonian.com/2015/10/21/the- insane-highway-plan-that-would-have-bulldozed-washington-dcs-most-charming-neighborhoods/ [https://perma.cc/6YCR-PKKR] (discussing the campaign to halt the building of highways in Washington, D.C.). ** Associate Professor of Clinical Law and Co-Faculty Director of the Center on Race, Inequality, and the Law, New York University School of Law. I thank Rachel Barkow, Richard Buery, Audrey McFarlane, Michael Pinard, Russell Robinson, Sarah Schindler, Tony Thompson, Kele Williams, and Katrina Wyman for helpful comments on earlier drafts. I also appreciate the insights I received from participants of faculty workshops at Brooklyn Law School and the University of Miami School of Law and participants at the 2019 Clinical Law Review Workshop at NYU Law School. I am grateful to Nelson Castano, Anna Applebaum, Michael Milov-Cordoba, and Rachel Sommer for their research assistance and to Sarah Jaramillo for her constant support of my research.
    [Show full text]
  • The Sandwich Local Comprehensive Plan Reflections & Directions
    Local Comprehensive Plan Town of Sandwich, MA LOCAL COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CONTRIBUTORS The Sandwich Local Comprehensive Plan Reflections & Directions Funding Sources The LCP Update project was made possible through a state grant from the Massachusetts Office of Transportation & Tourism received by the Cape Cod Canal Region Chamber of Commerce in cooperation with the Sandwich Chamber of Commerce, a grant from Barnstable County acting through the Cape Cod Economic Development Council, and the Town of Sandwich. Sandwich Local Planning Committee Robert Jensen, Chair Taylor White, Vice Chair Aleta Barton Kate Bavelock Tim Cooney Susan R. James Linell Grundman John G. Kennan Doug Lapp Trish Lubold Kevin O’Haire Marie Oliva Frank Pannorfi Glenn Paré David Sullivan Barbara Shaner Ralph Vitacco Sharon Gay, Grants Administrator, STG Consultants Sandwich Board of Selectmen Linell Grundman, Chair Frank Pannorfi John G. Kennan Randal Hunt Dana P. Barrette Tom Keyes, Past Chairman Sandwich Planning Board Amy Lipkind, Chair Taylor White, Vice-Chair Joseph Vaudo Daniel Marsters Ralph Vitacco Richard Claytor May 2009 Local Comprehensive Plan Town of Sandwich, MA Sandwich Town Departments George Dunham, Town Manager Doug Lapp, Assistant Town Manager Gregory M. Smith, Planning Director, Office of Planning and Development Marie Buckner, Director, Human Resources Susan Flynn, Tax Collector Doreen Guild, Town Accountant Donna Boardman, Building Commissioner Skip Tetreault, Buildings and Grounds, Sandwich School Department Rick Reino, Business Manager, Sandwich School Department George Russell, Chief, Fire Department Mike Miller, Chief, Police Department Craig Mayer, Town Treasurer John Johnson, Director of Golf, Sandwich Hollows Golf Course Richard Connor, Director, Sandwich Public Library Edward L. Childs, Principal Assessor, Assessor’s Office Janet Timmons, Director, Council on Aging Paul S.
    [Show full text]
  • Interchange Report CONTENTS NOTES Interstates Page Some Interchanges Are Complex
    Florida Department of Transportation Interchange Report CONTENTS NOTES Interstates Page Some interchanges are complex. I-4 2 This listing locates most I-10 3 interchanges at their centers or at I-110 5 the main cross road. It does not I-75 5 attempt to locate individual I-175 7 ramps. I-275 7 I-375 8 Not all of the expressways are I-95 8 operated by the Florida Department I-195 11 of Transportation (FDOT). Some are I-295 11 operated, all or in part, by I-395 12 expressway authorities. I-595 12 Expressways: Florida's Turnpike Page DEFINITIONS Florida's Turnpike Stub—SR-91 13 Florida's Turnpike & Extension—SR-91 and 821 13 Road ID and M.P. (mile point) are identifiers used internally by FDOT. Expressways: Southeast Page Cum. Miles (Cumulative Miles from Airport Expressway—SR-112 15 the start of the roadway) are Dolphin Expressway—SR-836 15 approximately the same as the Dolphin Expressway Extension, East-Bound—SR-836 16 numbers on the small green mile post signs along Interstate highways Dolphin Expressway Extension, West-Bound—SR-836 16 and many expressways. Don Shula Expressway—SR-874 16 Gratigny Parkway—SR-924 16 Road Number is the Interstate, US, Palmetto Expressway—SR-826 16 SR, or CR number (if any) of the cross road(s) at the interchange. Sawgrass Expressway—SR-869 17 Snapper Creek Expressway—SR-878 17 Road Name is the local name of the cross road(s) at the interchange. It Expressways: West-Central Page may be the same road shown with a Lee Roy Selmon-Crosstown Expressway—SR-618 18 Road Number, or it may be a different road.
    [Show full text]
  • Overall Corridor Report I-195 Corridor Planning Study
    OVERALL CORRIDOR REPORT I-195 CORRIDOR PLANNING STUDY I-95/NW 12TH AVENUE TO ALTON ROAD MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT NUMBER: 440228-1-22-01 Prepared for: PREPARED BY: BCC ENGINEERING, LLC 6401 SW 87TH AVENUE, SUITE 200 MIAMI, FLORIDA 33173 PREPARED ON: JUNE 2020 REVISED: SEPTEMBER 2020 OVERALL CORRIDOR REPORT I-195 Corridor Planning Study Project Study Limits: I-95/NW 12th Avenue to Alton Road Miami-Dade County, Florida Financial Management Number: 440228-1-22-01 Prepared for: Prepared by: BCC Engineering, LLC 4901 NW 17th Way, Suite 506 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33309 September 2020 I-195 Corridor Planning Study | Overall Corridor Report Septmeber 2020 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The purpose of the I-195 Corridor Planning Study (CPS) was to evaluate existing conditions and deficiencies, identify needs as well as develop and evaluate improvement concepts. Study interchanges were evaluated along with interchange influence areas, and ramp junctions to identify deficiencies focusing on recurring bottlenecks. From this review, a series of base Improvements were developed to address specific operational deficiencies and/or local issues raised by stakeholders as well as system improvement alternatives to address key study objectives related to improving system linkage, system capacity, accommodating future transportation demand, modal interrelationships, and provide better safety outcomes. The study also evaluated the feasibility of providing protected bicycle/pedestrian connections between the City of Miami Beach and the City of Miami. This overall corridor report (OCR) for the I-195 CPS, summarizes the efforts undertaken through data gathering, as well as a rigorous analysis of existing and future conditions within the study area to identify and evaluate alternatives that can be further developed in the next Project Development & Environment (PD&E) phase of the project.
    [Show full text]
  • Toll Facilities in the United States
    TOLL FACILITIES IN THE UNITED STATES Bridges - Roads - Tunnels - Ferries January 2016 Publication No: FHWA-PL-16-011 Internet: http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/policyinformation/tollpage/ LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS Auth Authority Jct Junction Ave Avenue Mi Mile AVI Automatic Vehicle Identification Mtn Mountain Brdg Bridge NHS National Highway System BC British Columbia, Canada NS Nova Scotia, Canada Cnty County ON Ontario, Canada Co Company Pkwy Parkway Com Commission Rd Road Const Construction Rdway Roadway Corp Corporation Sec Section Dept Department Serv Service Dev Development SH State Highway Dist District St Street Dr Drive Sys System Env Environmental TEA-21 Transportation Equity Act for the st ETC Electronic Toll Collection 21 Century Expway Expressway TIRIS Texas Instruments Registration Ext Extension Identification System FHWA Federal Highway Administration Traf Traffic Hazmat Hazardous Materials Trans Transportation Hwy Highway Trnpke Turnpike Id Identification US United States Internatl International Veh Vehicle IS Interstate System Vet Veteran 4R Resurfacing, Restoring ISTEA Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act Rehabilitation, Reconstruction Toll Roads in the United States: History and Current Policy History The early settlers who came to America found a land of dense wilderness, interlaced with creeks, rivers, and streams. Within this wilderness was an extensive network of trails, many of which were created by the migration of the buffalo and used by the Native American Indians as hunting and trading routes. These primitive trails were at first crooked and narrow. Over time, the trails were widened, straightened and improved by settlers for use by horse and wagons. These became some of the first roads in the new land.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016-2018 Mainedot Work Plan
    MaineDOT Work Plan Calendar Years 2016-2017-2018 January 2016 January 4, 2016 Dear MaineDOT Customer: Today, I am pleased to present the MaineDOT Work Plan for Calendar Years 2016-2017-2018. In this fourth annual Work Plan, our customers and partners will find basic information about the construction projects, maintenance, operations and administrative activities that MaineDOT will undertake over the next three years. Our customers—users of the transportation system—can learn about the work we plan to do in their town, city or region, and about where and how their tax dollars will be used. The Work Plan can help local and regional officials, legislators, government agencies, the construction industry, modal advocates and others with transportation interests—to plan their work, and also, to assess our effectiveness. The annual Work Plan has been well received, and is becoming more specific and more useful, every year. The estimated value of work in this Work Plan is more than $2.2 billion, with some 2,184 work items to be performed over three years. The Calendar Year (CY) 2016 work alone includes 497 capital projects with a combined total value of $520 million. The projects and activities listed for CY 2016 are more definitely funded and scheduled, while listings for CYs 2017 and 2018 may be more subject to fluctuations in funding and prices, permitting variables and weather conditions. The projects and work activities described in the Work Plan include all transportation modes in service in Maine—highways and bridges, transit (bus), passenger and freight railroad, aviation, ferries, ports and other marine facilities, and bicycle-pedestrian projects and operations.
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainable 2018 Annual Report
    Safe Reliable 2018 Annual Report Sustainable “For more than 70 years, the Maine Turnpike has provided safe and reliable travel—without any taxpayer support. It is our honor to be stewards of your road.” Dear Travelers, In the fall of 2018, we began issuing a series of contracts for approximately $145 million in new construction—about two thirds of which will be to widen the turnpike around Portland. This is one of the largest series of capital projects in the history of the Turnpike. In order to widen the mainline around Portland from mile 44 to mile 49, we need to rebuild both the Cummings Road Bridge and the Exit 45 interchange. We must also widen and repair bridges over the Stroudwater River, The Maine Central Railroad, and Warren Avenue. On the south end, we have started work on a new plaza for the York Toll. In the spring of 2019, Maine DOT and New Hampshire DOT will award a contract for over $50 million in repairs to the High Level Bridge originally constructed in 1972. In later phases of this work, the Turnpike will join with New Hampshire DOT in creating a system to open either side of the bridge to four-lane traffic during temporary periods of intense traffic. In this report, we will detail our progress in 2018 through the lens of our tagline “Safe l Reliable l Sustainable,” defining what each of these words mean to the MTA, and by extension, what this commitment means to the people of Maine, and all those who travel the Turnpike.
    [Show full text]
  • Update 1313 Sequence Plan
    CRAWFORD STREET BUILDING DEMOLITION CONTRACTS LANDSCAPE CONTRACTS BUILDING DEMO CONTRACT 1 $245,000 AS BID LANDSCAPE CONTRACT "A" - $1.77 M (2009) RI Contract No. 2000-CH-066 LANDSCAPE CONTRACT "B" - $1.14 M (2010) BUILDING DEMO CONTRACT 2 $737,885 AS BID LANDSCAPE CONTRACT "C" - $2.00 M (2011) RI Contract No. 2001-CH-054 N PROVIDENCE RIVER PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE BUILDING DEMO CONTRACT 3 $1,773,222 AS BID RI Contract No. 2003-CH-021 BUILDING DEMO CONTRACT 4 $157,935 AS BID RIVER SOUTH RI Contract No. 2002-CH-007 DORRANCE MAIN BUILDING DEMO CONTRACT 5 $164,565 AS BID H RI Contract No. 2003-CH-022 STREET STREET TRENTON ST. MEMORIAL STREET SOUTH GANO ST. JAMES ST. STREET SEEKONK WATER BOULEVARD FRIENDSHIP WICKENDEN ST. RAMP OFF I-195 STREET TRANSIT ST. CLIFFORD WASHINGTON BRIDGE SOUTH MAIN ST. ST. WADE PROJECT RICHMOND SHELDON ST. PROVIDENCE BENEFIT ST. FURNACE ST. FURNACE SCHOFIELD ST. SCHOFIELD IVES ST. IVES DOLLAR ST. FOX POINT GANO ST. ON RAMP STREET SOUTH WATER ST. ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ST. ST. ST. TOCKWOTTON GANO ST. GANO TRAVERSE WICKENDEN HOME CHESTNUT CLAVERICK HOPE ST. HOPE BROOK BROOK SHIP STREET ANN ST. ANN INTERSTATE I-195 WESTBOUND WESTMINSTER STREET ST. ST. ARMSTRONG ST. COHAN BLVD ST. STREET SOUTH MAIN ST. PIKE ST. ST. THOMPSON INTERSTATE I-195 EASTBOUND FOSTER COHAN BLVD ST. INDIA ST. ST. RAMP SMERAMP EI CLAVERICK BROAD ST. INDIA ST. BROWN BOATHOUSE DRIVE SOUTH ST. RAMP WSM PINE ST. ST. POINT STREET BRIDGE 54" NBC SEWER DAVOL SQ. PIKE OVERLOOK PARK FRIENDSHIP ST. INTERSTATE ROUTE 95 NORTHBOUND SOUTH WATER ST.
    [Show full text]
  • Transportation Technical Report
    Appendix D.2 Transportation Technical Report BALTIMORE-WASHINGTON, D.C. SUPERCONDUCTING MAGLEV PROJECT DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT AND SECTION 4(f) EVALUATION Appendix D.2 Transportation Technical Report Table of Contents Appendix D.2A Transportation ................................................................................................ A-1 D.2A.1 Transportation Components of Current, Future No-Build, and Future .......................... Build Conditions ...................................................................................................... A-1 D.2A.2 Transportation Network Component: SCMAGLEV - Future Build Condition ............ A-2 D.2A.3 Transportation Network Component: MARC Commuter Rail Current ........................... Condition Service Characteristics ............................................................................ A-5 D.2A.4 Transportation Network Component: Local Transit Systems within Affected Environment ......................................................................................................... A.4-9 D.2A.5 Transportation Network Component: Project Area Roadway Network ............... A.5-17 D.2A.6 Transportation Network Component: Station Area Street Network - ............................. Baltimore Camden Yards Alternative .................................................................. A.6-27 D.2A.7 Transportation Network Component: Station Area Street Network - ............................. Baltimore Cherry Hill Alternative ........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Meeting Location Building Security Parking Metro
    Meeting Location U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Headquarters Auditorium Two White Flint North Building 11545 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD 20852-2738 Building Security Please arrive at 8:00 a.m. to allow extra time to go through security when arriving for the meeting. All non-NRC employees please be prepared to present a valid drivers license and another picture identification (federal employees may use their badge as the second identification) to the guards at the guard station upon entering the auditorium side entrance (please see map and instructions on how to enter the building in the “Metro” section below). Note: You may be subject to security screening by guards through metal detectors and/or x-ray equipment. Parking There is very limited metered parking on Marinelli Drive near the NRC campus. There is very expensive parking in the nearby Metro parking garage off of on Marinelli Drive, and you must have a Metro SmartTrip card (see: http://www.wmata.com/fares/smartrip/) to pay the expensive parking fee to exit the Metro parking garage. Metro The easiest access to NRC’s Headquarters campus is via the Metro on the Red Line. The NRC campus is located adjacent to the White Flint Metro stop. Reagan National Airport and Union Station (AMTRAK) both have Metro stops. Although Dulles International Airport is not serviced by Metro, there is Fairfax Connector Shuttle bus (#983) to the Metro (10 minute ride to the Wiehle-Reston Station on the Silver Line). Baltimore-Washington International (BWI) Airport is not directly accessible to the Metro but is accessible to AMTRAK (at scheduled times) which stops at Union Station which has a Metro stop on the Red Line.
    [Show full text]