DOCSLIB.ORG

Transportation Technical Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Transportation Technical Report Appendix D.2 Transportation Technical Report BALTIMORE-WASHINGTON, D.C. SUPERCONDUCTING MAGLEV PROJECT DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT AND SECTION 4(f) EVALUATION Appendix D.2 Transportation Technical Report Table of Contents Appendix D.2A Transportation ................................................................................................ A-1 D.2A.1 Transportation Components of Current, Future No-Build, and Future .......................... Build Conditions ...................................................................................................... A-1 D.2A.2 Transportation Network Component: SCMAGLEV - Future Build Condition ............ A-2 D.2A.3 Transportation Network Component: MARC Commuter Rail Current ........................... Condition Service Characteristics ............................................................................ A-5 D.2A.4 Transportation Network Component: Local Transit Systems within Affected Environment ......................................................................................................... A.4-9 D.2A.5 Transportation Network Component: Project Area Roadway Network ............... A.5-17 D.2A.6 Transportation Network Component: Station Area Street Network - ............................. Baltimore Camden Yards Alternative .................................................................. A.6-27 D.2A.7 Transportation Network Component: Station Area Street Network - ............................. Baltimore Cherry Hill Alternative ......................................................................... A.7-29 D.2A.8 Transportation Network Component: Mount Vernon East Station Area ........................ Street Network ................................................................................................... A.8-32 D.2A.9 Transportation Network Component: Roadway Network around Train ......................... Maintenance Facility (TMF) Alternatives............................................................. A.9-37 D.2A.10 Transportation Network Component: Required Roadway Realignments .................... (Horizontal and Vertical) Resulting from SCMAGLEV Alignment and .......................... Facilities ........................................................................................................... A.10-40 D.2A.11 Transportation Network Component: Access Summary to BWI Marshall ................... Airport .............................................................................................................. A.11-41 D.2A.12 Transportation Network Component: Station Area Parking Current and ..................... Future Conditions .................................................................................................. A-44 D.2A.13 SCMAGLEV Station Area Pedestrian Networks – Current Conditions and ................. Backup Data ......................................................................................................... A-44 D.2A.14 SCMAGLEV Station Area Pick Up and Drop Off Operations – Current ...................... Conditions and Backup Data ................................................................................. A-49 D.2A.15 Construction Period Impacts - Truck Delivery Access and Departure Routes ............ to SCMAGLEV Construction Sites......................................................................... A-52 D.2A.16 Construction Period Activity - Impacts to Transit Operations Due to .......................... Construction Activity .............................................................................................. A-92 D.2A.17 Construction Period Activity - Impacts to Traffic Operations and Parking Due ............ to Construction Activity .......................................................................................... A-95 D.2A.18 Technical Analysis Methodology Introduction ..................................................... A-99 Appendix D.2B Ridership Forecasting – Ridership Forecasting Development Process ...... B-104 D.2B.1 Data Collection ..................................................................................................... B-104 D.2B.2 Trip Table Development........................................................................................ B-104 D.2B.3 Primary Market Research ...................................................................................... B-105 Draft Environmental Impact Statement and Section 4(f) Evaluation TOC-i Appendix D.2 Transportation Technical Report D.2B.4 SCMAGLEV Ridership Forecasts ....................................................................... B-105 Appendix D.2C Ridership Forecasting – Travel Demand Model .......................................... C-105 D.2C.1 Time periods........................................................................................................ C-106 D.2C.2 Annual Ridership Estimates ................................................................................. C-106 D.2C.3 Project Study Area ............................................................................................... C-106 D.2C.4 Current Level of Intercity Trips ............................................................................ C-106 D.2C.5 Trip Volume Growth ............................................................................................. C-106 D.2C.6 Discrete Choice Analysis ...................................................................................... C-107 D.2C.7 Mode Choice Model............................................................................................. C-107 D.2C.8 Implied Value of Time .......................................................................................... C-107 Appendix D.2D Ridership Forecasting – Data Sources and Results .................................... D-107 D.2D.1 Fare Assumptions................................................................................................ D-107 D.2D.2 Data Outputs ....................................................................................................... D-109 Appendix D.2E Pedestrian Access Methodology ................................................................. E-110 D.2E.1 Process Steps ..................................................................................................... E-110 D.2E.2 Future Traffic Conditions: Build vs. No-Build Methodology................................. E-115 D.2E.3 Construction Period Traffic Impacts ................................................................... E-119 LIST OF TABLES Table D.2-1: SCMAGLEV Trains Per Hour and Hourly Capacity, by Direction ........................ A-2 Table D.2-2: Forecasted Total Daily Boardings by SCMAGLEV Station – Horizon ...................... Year 2045 ........................................................................................................ A-3 Table D.2-3: Forecasted Changes in Vehicle Miles Traveled within the Affected ........................ Environment for the Years 2030 and 2045, by Baltimore Station ......................... Alternative (Build vs. No-Build) ......................................................................... A-3 Table D.2-4: Forecasted Changes in Rail Passenger Miles Traveled within the Affected Environment for the Years 2030 and 2045, by Baltimore Station Alternative ........ (Build vs. No Build) .......................................................................................... A-4 Table D.2-5: Forecasted Changes in Bus Passenger Miles Traveled within the Affected Environment for the Years 2030 and 2045, by Baltimore Station ......................... Alternative (Build vs. No Build) ......................................................................... A-4 Table D.2-6: Forecasted Aggregate Hours of Travel Time Savings within the Affected Environment for Years 2030 and 2045, by Baltimore Station Scenario ................ (Build vs. No Build) .......................................................................................... A-5 Table D.2-7: MARC Penn Line Service Frequencies by Time of Day and Direction .............. A-7 Table D.2-8: MARC Penn Line Station Stops ....................................................................... A-7 Table D.2-9: MARC Penn Line Trip Times by Time of Day and Direction: Baltimore ................ Penn Station to Washington Union Station....................................................... A-8 Draft Environmental Impact Statement and Section 4(f) Evaluation TOC-ii Appendix D.2 Transportation Technical Report Table D.2-10: MARC Camden Line Service Frequencies by Time of Day and Direction ......... A-8 Table D.2-11: MARC Camden Line Station Stops ................................................................ A.3-9 Table D.2-12: ARC Camden Line Trip Times by Time of Day and Direction ......................... A.3-9 Table D.2-13: MDOT MTA Commuter Bus Service from Howard County ........................... A.4-16 Table D.2-14: WMATA Metrobus Local Service in Vicinity of Proposed Mount Vernon ............... East SCMAGLEV Station ............................................................................ A.4-17 Table D.2-15: Regional Roadway Network Daily Volumes by Key Roadway Link (both directions) – By Alternative and Year – Cherry Hill Baltimore Station ................... Scenario ..................................................................................................... A.5-25 Table D.2-16: Regional Roadway Network Daily Volumes by Key Roadway Link (both directions)
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Directions to Rockburn Branch Park
    DIRECTIONS: River Hill June 24 6050 Daybreak Circle, Clarksville, MD 21029 From Interstate 95, take MD Rt 32 West (Exit 38) toward Columbia to Clarksville. Proceed to MD Rt 32 directions. From Interstate 70, take MD Rt 32 South to Clarksville. From MD Rt 32, Exit onto MD Rt 108 (Exit 20) East toward Columbia. Go approximately 1/4 mile to the River Hill Village Center, and turn right onto Great Star Dr. AVA-264 Turn left onto Daybreak Cir. Park in the Village Center parking lot near Giant Food. Presents Three Saturday Morning Harper’s Choice August 5 5440 Old Tucker Row, Columbia, MD 21044 From Interstate 95: take Exit 38 (Route 32) west towards Columbia for 4 miles to Cedar Lane. Turn Right on Cedar Lane and follow to end. Turn Left, then right to enter Harpers Choice Village Center. From Route 70, take Route 32 east towards Columbia for 12 miles to Cedar Lane. In Columbia, Howard County, Maryland Turn Left on Cedar Lane and follow to end. Turn Left, then right to enter and park at the Harpers Choice Village Center. June 24 River Hill AT2017/107720; 10 km/5 km; Trail Rating 2A Owen Brown September 9 7246 Cradlerock Way, Columbia, Maryland 21045 August 5 Harper’s Choice From Baltimore or Washington: Take I-95 to Maryland Route 32, Exit 38B toward Columbia AT2017/107751; 10 km/5 km; Trail Rating 2A Take Exit 38B onto Route 32 W, toward Columbia 1.6 miles. Take the first Exit onto Broken Land Parkway north toward Owen September 9 Owen Brown Brown (go about .7 miles).
    [Show full text]
  • Howard County
    A. Raul Delerme, Director Howard County [email protected] RECREATION & PARKS Phone: 410-313-4640 Fax: 410-313-1699 7120 Oakland Mills Road, Columbia, Maryland 21046 www.howardcountymd.gov/rapVoicefRelay: 410-31 3 -7275 August 25, 2020 Ms. Margaret Lashar ProgramOpen SpaceAdministrator Departmentof Natural Resources 580 Taylor Avenue, E-4 Annapolis, MD 21401 RE: Howard County FY2021 Annual Program for Program Open Space Assistance Dear Ms. Lashar: Enclosed is the FY2021 Howard County Annual Program for Program Open Space funding. This Annual Program is in accordance with our 2017 Land Preservation, Parks and Recreation Plan and the Plan Howard 2030 General Plan. A narrativeis attachedto addressour projectselection process, as well asthe compatibility of our projects to the Eight Visions, the Plan Howard 2030 General Plan, the 2017 Land Preservation, Parks and Recreation Plan, and the Smart Growth initiatives. We have listed projects to fully encumber all available funds. Should you require additional information, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, au Chief lg and Construction A. Raul Delerme Director Enclosure CC: Calvin Ball, County Executive Delegate Warren E. Miller DelegateTrent M. Kittleman DelegateCourtney Watson DelegateEric D. Ebersole DelegateTerri L. Hill DelegateJessica Feldmark Delegate Vanessa E. Atterbeary DelegateShane E. Pendergrass DelegateJen Tenasa SenatorKatie Fry Hester SenatorClarence K. Lam Senator Guy J. Guzzone Margaret Lashar,Maryland Department of Natural Resources Debbie Herr Cornwell, Maryland Department of Planning Howard County Executive Calvin Ball w\vw.howardcountymd.gov A. Raul Delerme, Director Howard County rdelerme@how ardcountymd.gov RECREATION & PARKS Phone: 410-313-4640 Fax: 410-313-1699 7120 Oakland Mills Road, Columbia, Maryland 21046 www.howardcountymd.gov/rapVoice/Relay: 410-31 3 -7275 August 25, 2020 Debbie Herr Cornwell, PLA, ASLA Maryland Department of Planning 301 West Preston Street, Suite 1101 Baltimore, MD 21201 RE: Howard County FY2021 Annual Program for Program Open Space Assistance Dear Mrs.
    [Show full text]
  • Air Quality Profile of Curtis Bay, Brooklyn and Hawkins Point, Maryland
    Air Quality Profile Of Curtis Bay, Brooklyn and Hawkins Point, Maryland © 2011, Curtis W. Wright, All Rights Reserved March 2012 Revised June 2012 About the Environmental Integrity Project The Environmental Integrity Project (EIP) is a nonpartisan, nonprofit organization dedicated to the enforcement of the nation’s anti-pollution laws and to the prevention of political interference with those laws. EIP provides objective analysis of how the failure to enforce or implement environmental laws increases pollution and harms public health. We also help local communities obtain the protection of environmental laws. Acknowledgement Environmental Integrity Project Research Analyst Robbie Orvis and Attorneys Abel Russ and Leah Kelly contributed to this report. Data Limitations EIP’s analysis of toxic emissions and potential health impacts is based on publicly available data retrieved and analyzed from EPA, state agencies and private companies. Occasionally, government data may contain errors, either because information is inaccurately reported by the regulated entities or incorrectly transcribed by government agencies. In addition, this report is based on data retrieved between August 2011 and February 2012, and subsequent data retrievals may differ slightly as some companies and agencies correct prior reports. EIP is committed to ensuring that the data we present are as accurate as possible. We will correct any errors that are verifiable. June 2012 Revision EIP revised this report in June of 2012 in order to exclude fine particulate matter (PM2.5) data recorded at the FMC Fairfield monitor in Curtis Bay during the year 2008. We did this because we were informed by the Maryland Department of the Environment that this monitor was removed in August of 2008, meaning that the average PM2.5 concentration for that year did not take into account the fall months, during which PM2.5 concentrations tend to be lower than in the summer.
    [Show full text]
  • Baltlink Rider Guide-944004A2.Pdf
    WHAT IS BALTIMORELINK? BaltimoreLink is a complete overhaul and rebranding of the core transit system operating within Baltimore City and the surrounding region. Many of MTA’s current bus routes are outdated, and BaltimoreLink will improve service through a more reliable and efficient network. BaltimoreLink also includes transfer facilities, dedicated bus lanes, signal priority, and improved bus stop signs, among many other improvements. To deliver an interconnected transit network, existing MTA bus and rail services will be restructured and renamed: • CityLink: Twelve new high-frequency, color-coded bus routes will connect with each other, as well as Metro SubwayLink, Light RailLink, MARC Train, Commuter Bus, Amtrak, and other services, into one integrated transit network. • LocalLink (currently Local Bus): LocalLink routes will provide comprehensive crosstown connections and improved connections to neighborhoods and communities throughout the system. • Express BusLink (currently Express Bus): Express BusLink will include several existing Express Bus services that provide suburb-to- city connections and recently launched routes providing suburb-to-suburb connections. Typically, Express Bus routes have fewer stops and use higher speed roads. • Light RailLink (currently Light Rail): Light Rail service will operate along the same line but with improved connections to buses. • Metro SubwayLink (currently Metro Subway): This service will not change but will have improved connections to buses. baltimorelink.com | 1 BETTER BUS STOPS BALTIMORELINK RESOURCE INFORMATION To create a better rider experience by providing information you can use, the MTA will be All MTA routes will change under installing new bus stop signs throughout the BaltimoreLink. Please look for Rider Alerts for entire MTA bus network.
    [Show full text]
  • Read Ebook {PDF EPUB} 1111 by Kayil York
    Read Ebook {PDF EPUB} 1111 by Kayil York 11:11 by Kayil York (2019, Trade Paperback) С самой низкой ценой, совершенно новый, неиспользованный, неоткрытый, неповрежденный товар в оригинальной упаковке (если товар поставляется в упаковке). Упаковка должна быть такой же, как упаковка этого товара в розничных магазинах, за исключением тех случаев, когда товар является изделием ручной работы или был упакован производителем в упаковку не для розничной продажи, например в коробку без маркировки или в пластиковый пакет. См. подробные сведения с дополнительным описанием товара. Complete Maryland accident reports and news. Home to the Baltimore-Washington Metro Area, Maryland sees millions of people on the road every day. While Maryland has a population of nearly 6 million on its own, the metro region, which directly impacts highway congestion, has a population topping 8 million. Both the metro area’s major biotechnology and defense contractor industries and tourists visiting the area for its rich history keep the small area’s many major roadways full: Interstate 70 starts at a Baltimore park and ride and extends all the way to Cove Fort, Utah. Interstate 81 runs through Hagerstown. Interstate 83 has its southern terminus in Baltimore, a route for travelers from there to Harrisburg, Pennsylvania.​ Interstate 95 is the east coast’s major highway, serving every major metropolitan area from Maine to Florida. It is the nation’s longest north-south interstate. ​ Interstate 97: Known as an intrastate interstate, I-97 runs entirely within the state of Maryland and connects Baltimore and Annapolis. It connects Annapolis with Baltimore-Washington International Airport (BWI). Interstate 195 : Also known as Metropolitan Boulevard, Interstate 195 is just 4.71 miles long.
    [Show full text]
  • Dimensions Healthcare System Request for Proposals the State Of
    Dimensions Healthcare System Request for Proposals The State of Maryland and Prince George’s County have each enacted legislative policies that encourage the participation of locally- based and minority-owned businesses. I. DEFINITIONS 1.1 “Contractor” means the Offeror selected and contracted in accordance with sections 5.5 and 5.7 of this RFP to perform the work specified in Part IV of this RFP. 1.2 “Contract Manager” means the staff representative of the Oversight Committee designated in section 4.8 of this RFP who will oversee, on behalf of the Oversight Committee, the Project and the Contractor’s activities. 1.3 “Offeror” means an entity that submits a timely proposal in response to and in accordance with the terms of this RFP. 1.4 “Oversight Committee” or “Committee” means the committee created pursuant to the Memorandum of Understanding between the State of Maryland and Prince George’s County described in section 2.2 of this RFP, to support and enhance the medical services provided by the health care facilities managed by Dimensions Healthcare System. 1.5 “Project” means the services described in Part IV of this RFP. 1.6 “Project Manager” means the individual representative of the Contractor designated in its proposal, pursuant to subsection 5.1.2 of this RFP, as responsible for management of the Project and the services described in Part IV of this RFP, and who serves as the primary point of contact for the Contractor regarding all tasks related to the engagement. 1.7 “Project Coordinator” means the representative or representatives of Dimensions Healthcare System identified in section 4.8 of this RFP who are responsible for on-site, day-to-day project coordination with the Contractor.
    [Show full text]
  • HOWARD COUNTY OFFICIALS FIELD DIRECTIONS Alpha Ridge Park from the Baltimore Beltway (I-695) Or from Route 29, Take I-70 West to the Marriottsville Road Exit
    HOWARD COUNTY OFFICIALS FIELD DIRECTIONS Alpha Ridge Park From the Baltimore Beltway (I-695) or from Route 29, take I-70 West to the Marriottsville Road exit. Turn Right (North) on Marriottsville Road, then left at the next traffic light, Route 99. Follow Route 99 about 0.8 miles to the wooden sign (second sign) for Alpha Ridge Park on the left. From Columbia, take Route 32 West to Route 99. Make a right turn and follow Route 99 to the entrance of Alpha Ridge Park. APL From Route 32 take Cedar Lane/Pindell School Road exit (1st exit West of Route 29). Go South on Pindell School Road to 1st intersection. Turn left onto Sanner Road. After Sanner Road makes a sharp right it will go up a hill. Field will be at the top of the hill on the left. Alternate: From Route 32 take Route 29 South. Go to Johns Hopkins Road. Take Johns Hopkins Road West to Sanner Road. Turn Right on Sanner Road and follow to field which will be on your Right. Cedar Lane Park From Route 29 take Route 108 west toward Clarksville about 2 3/4 miles. Turn left onto Cedar Lane (across from Board of Education). Entrance to park is about 1/4 mile on the left. Centennial Park Centennial Park West (Ball Fields 3,4,5) From Route 29 take Route 108 west toward Clarksville. Turn right onto Centennial Lane. Entrance to park will be on the right. Centennial Park North (Ball Fields 1,2) Continue past entrance to Centennial Park West.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2017-2018
    EXCELLENCEANNUAL REPORT 2017–2018 IMPACT SUCCESS MESSAGE ANNUAL REPORT 2017–2018 PRESIDENT’S 2019–2021 Strategic Plan ....................................4 PATHWAYS Culinary Arts Center Opening ....................5 Prince George’s Community College now offers 10 academic Lanham Hall Opening ................................................6 pathways to degrees, certificates, Extension Centers ........................................................20 licensures, workforce trainings, and professional development. Financial Reports .......................................................... 28 Page 11 PGCC Foundation ..........................................................30 Grants ................................................................................................ 32 Donors .............................................................................................. 34 FRONT COVER Drs. Anthony T. Fulton and Thomisha M. Duru are two of the many faculty featured throughout the college in recognition of the great value and talent of our vast array of educators. MESSAGE PRESIDENT’S Prince George’s Community Their hard work and College (PGCC) had an exemplary dedication continue to receive year and set the tone for how the college honorable recognition, including receiving intends to support student success and address the highest rating on the Maryland State the region’s most pertinent needs. Thanks to the Department of Education 2018–2019 Maryland School leadership and collaborative efforts of our Board of Trustees, Report Card.
    [Show full text]
  • Resolution #20-9
    BALTIMORE METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION BALTIMORE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION BOARD RESOLUTION #20-9 RESOLUTION TO ENDORSE THE UPDATED BALTIMORE REGION COORDINATED PUBLIC TRANSIT – HUMAN SERVICES TRANSPORTATION PLAN WHEREAS, the Baltimore Regional Transportation Board (BRTB) is the designated Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) for the Baltimore region, encompassing the Baltimore Urbanized Area, and includes official representatives of the cities of Annapolis and Baltimore; the counties of Anne Arundel, Baltimore, Carroll, Harford, Howard, and Queen Anne’s; and representatives of the Maryland Departments of Transportation, the Environment, Planning, the Maryland Transit Administration, Harford Transit; and WHEREAS, the Baltimore Regional Transportation Board as the Metropolitan Planning Organization for the Baltimore region, has responsibility under the provisions of the Fixing America’s Surface Transportation (FAST) Act for developing and carrying out a continuing, cooperative, and comprehensive transportation planning process for the metropolitan area; and WHEREAS, the Federal Transit Administration, a modal division of the U.S. Department of Transportation, requires under FAST Act the establishment of a locally developed, coordinated public transit-human services transportation plan. Previously, under MAP-21, legislation combined the New Freedom Program and the Elderly Individuals and Individuals with Disabilities Program into a new Enhanced Mobility of Seniors and Individuals with Disabilities Program, better known as Section 5310. Guidance on the new program was provided in Federal Transit Administration Circular 9070.1G released on June 6, 2014; and WHEREAS, the Federal Transit Administration requires a plan to be developed and periodically updated by a process that includes representatives of public, private, and nonprofit transportation and human services providers and participation by the public.
    [Show full text]
  • Toll Roads in the United States: History and Current Policy
    TOLL FACILITIES IN THE UNITED STATES Bridges - Roads - Tunnels - Ferries August 2009 Publication No: FHWA-PL-09-00021 Internet: http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ohim/tollpage.htm Toll Roads in the United States: History and Current Policy History The early settlers who came to America found a land of dense wilderness, interlaced with creeks, rivers, and streams. Within this wilderness was an extensive network of trails, many of which were created by the migration of the buffalo and used by the Native American Indians as hunting and trading routes. These primitive trails were at first crooked and narrow. Over time, the trails were widened, straightened and improved by settlers for use by horse and wagons. These became some of the first roads in the new land. After the American Revolution, the National Government began to realize the importance of westward expansion and trade in the development of the new Nation. As a result, an era of road building began. This period was marked by the development of turnpike companies, our earliest toll roads in the United States. In 1792, the first turnpike was chartered and became known as the Philadelphia and Lancaster Turnpike in Pennsylvania. It was the first road in America covered with a layer of crushed stone. The boom in turnpike construction began, resulting in the incorporation of more than 50 turnpike companies in Connecticut, 67 in New York, and others in Massachusetts and around the country. A notable turnpike, the Boston-Newburyport Turnpike, was 32 miles long and cost approximately $12,500 per mile to construct. As the Nation grew, so did the need for improved roads.
    [Show full text]
  • The Bulletin STATEN ISLAND’S 157-YEAR-OLD RAILROAD
    ERA BULLETIN — SEPTEMBER, 2017 The Bulletin Electric Railroaders’ Association, Incorporated Vol. 60, No. 9 September, 2017 The Bulletin STATEN ISLAND’S 157-YEAR-OLD RAILROAD Published by the Electric (Continued from August, 2017 issue) Railroaders’ Association, Incorporated, PO Box Before the end of 1925, the railroad was Buses adjacent to the railroad appeared in 3323, New York, New able to operate full electric service from St. the 1920s, but the railroad still made a profit. York 10163-3323. George to Tottenville, South Beach, and Ar- Several years later, railroad riding declined lington with 100 new M.U. electric cars. The because of competition from the buses. For general inquiries, or fleet was composed of 90 motor cars num- When the Isle Transportation Company sur- Bulletin submissions, bered 300-389 and ten trailers numbered rendered its franchise on February 23, 1947, contact us at bulletin@ erausa.org. ERA’s 500-509, of which five were eventually con- the Board of Transportation started operating website is verted to motors. Freight was also carried on the buses immediately, retaining the five-cent www.erausa.org. nearly the entire line, including the non- fare with several five-cent zones depending electrified track extending from Arlington on the distance. On July 1, 1948, bus fares Editorial Staff: across the bridge to Cranford Junction, New were increased to seven cents, zone fares Editor-in-Chief: Bernard Linder Jersey. Because the passenger service usu- were abolished, and passengers could buy a Tri-State News and ally operated at a deficit, the company was 2-cent transfer valid on subway lines at Commuter Rail Editor: unable to spend $17 million to extend the South Ferry, Manhattan.
    [Show full text]
  • Existing Conditions Evaluation
    Jabez Branch 3 Watershed Restoration Implementation Plan Existing Conditions Evaluation April 2015 Prepared For: 707 North Calvert Street Baltimore, Maryland 21202 Prepared by: Contents Introduction: ................................................................................................................................................. 4 Table 1: Jabez Branch 3 Watershed Land Use Data ................................................................................. 4 Background: .................................................................................................................................................. 6 Stream Assessment: ...................................................................................................................................... 7 Procedure: ................................................................................................................................................ 7 Table 2: Rapid Stream Characterization Summary Table ........................................................................ 8 Reach 1 ..................................................................................................................................................... 9 Reach 2 ..................................................................................................................................................... 9 UT 1 ..................................................................................................................................................... 10
    [Show full text]