Transportation Technical Report

Transportation Technical Report

Appendix D.2 Transportation Technical Report BALTIMORE-WASHINGTON, D.C. SUPERCONDUCTING MAGLEV PROJECT DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT AND SECTION 4(f) EVALUATION Appendix D.2 Transportation Technical Report Table of Contents Appendix D.2A Transportation ................................................................................................ A-1 D.2A.1 Transportation Components of Current, Future No-Build, and Future .......................... Build Conditions ...................................................................................................... A-1 D.2A.2 Transportation Network Component: SCMAGLEV - Future Build Condition ............ A-2 D.2A.3 Transportation Network Component: MARC Commuter Rail Current ........................... Condition Service Characteristics ............................................................................ A-5 D.2A.4 Transportation Network Component: Local Transit Systems within Affected Environment ......................................................................................................... A.4-9 D.2A.5 Transportation Network Component: Project Area Roadway Network ............... A.5-17 D.2A.6 Transportation Network Component: Station Area Street Network - ............................. Baltimore Camden Yards Alternative .................................................................. A.6-27 D.2A.7 Transportation Network Component: Station Area Street Network - ............................. Baltimore Cherry Hill Alternative ......................................................................... A.7-29 D.2A.8 Transportation Network Component: Mount Vernon East Station Area ........................ Street Network ................................................................................................... A.8-32 D.2A.9 Transportation Network Component: Roadway Network around Train ......................... Maintenance Facility (TMF) Alternatives............................................................. A.9-37 D.2A.10 Transportation Network Component: Required Roadway Realignments .................... (Horizontal and Vertical) Resulting from SCMAGLEV Alignment and .......................... Facilities ........................................................................................................... A.10-40 D.2A.11 Transportation Network Component: Access Summary to BWI Marshall ................... Airport .............................................................................................................. A.11-41 D.2A.12 Transportation Network Component: Station Area Parking Current and ..................... Future Conditions .................................................................................................. A-44 D.2A.13 SCMAGLEV Station Area Pedestrian Networks – Current Conditions and ................. Backup Data ......................................................................................................... A-44 D.2A.14 SCMAGLEV Station Area Pick Up and Drop Off Operations – Current ...................... Conditions and Backup Data ................................................................................. A-49 D.2A.15 Construction Period Impacts - Truck Delivery Access and Departure Routes ............ to SCMAGLEV Construction Sites......................................................................... A-52 D.2A.16 Construction Period Activity - Impacts to Transit Operations Due to .......................... Construction Activity .............................................................................................. A-92 D.2A.17 Construction Period Activity - Impacts to Traffic Operations and Parking Due ............ to Construction Activity .......................................................................................... A-95 D.2A.18 Technical Analysis Methodology Introduction ..................................................... A-99 Appendix D.2B Ridership Forecasting – Ridership Forecasting Development Process ...... B-104 D.2B.1 Data Collection ..................................................................................................... B-104 D.2B.2 Trip Table Development........................................................................................ B-104 D.2B.3 Primary Market Research ...................................................................................... B-105 Draft Environmental Impact Statement and Section 4(f) Evaluation TOC-i Appendix D.2 Transportation Technical Report D.2B.4 SCMAGLEV Ridership Forecasts ....................................................................... B-105 Appendix D.2C Ridership Forecasting – Travel Demand Model .......................................... C-105 D.2C.1 Time periods........................................................................................................ C-106 D.2C.2 Annual Ridership Estimates ................................................................................. C-106 D.2C.3 Project Study Area ............................................................................................... C-106 D.2C.4 Current Level of Intercity Trips ............................................................................ C-106 D.2C.5 Trip Volume Growth ............................................................................................. C-106 D.2C.6 Discrete Choice Analysis ...................................................................................... C-107 D.2C.7 Mode Choice Model............................................................................................. C-107 D.2C.8 Implied Value of Time .......................................................................................... C-107 Appendix D.2D Ridership Forecasting – Data Sources and Results .................................... D-107 D.2D.1 Fare Assumptions................................................................................................ D-107 D.2D.2 Data Outputs ....................................................................................................... D-109 Appendix D.2E Pedestrian Access Methodology ................................................................. E-110 D.2E.1 Process Steps ..................................................................................................... E-110 D.2E.2 Future Traffic Conditions: Build vs. No-Build Methodology................................. E-115 D.2E.3 Construction Period Traffic Impacts ................................................................... E-119 LIST OF TABLES Table D.2-1: SCMAGLEV Trains Per Hour and Hourly Capacity, by Direction ........................ A-2 Table D.2-2: Forecasted Total Daily Boardings by SCMAGLEV Station – Horizon ...................... Year 2045 ........................................................................................................ A-3 Table D.2-3: Forecasted Changes in Vehicle Miles Traveled within the Affected ........................ Environment for the Years 2030 and 2045, by Baltimore Station ......................... Alternative (Build vs. No-Build) ......................................................................... A-3 Table D.2-4: Forecasted Changes in Rail Passenger Miles Traveled within the Affected Environment for the Years 2030 and 2045, by Baltimore Station Alternative ........ (Build vs. No Build) .......................................................................................... A-4 Table D.2-5: Forecasted Changes in Bus Passenger Miles Traveled within the Affected Environment for the Years 2030 and 2045, by Baltimore Station ......................... Alternative (Build vs. No Build) ......................................................................... A-4 Table D.2-6: Forecasted Aggregate Hours of Travel Time Savings within the Affected Environment for Years 2030 and 2045, by Baltimore Station Scenario ................ (Build vs. No Build) .......................................................................................... A-5 Table D.2-7: MARC Penn Line Service Frequencies by Time of Day and Direction .............. A-7 Table D.2-8: MARC Penn Line Station Stops ....................................................................... A-7 Table D.2-9: MARC Penn Line Trip Times by Time of Day and Direction: Baltimore ................ Penn Station to Washington Union Station....................................................... A-8 Draft Environmental Impact Statement and Section 4(f) Evaluation TOC-ii Appendix D.2 Transportation Technical Report Table D.2-10: MARC Camden Line Service Frequencies by Time of Day and Direction ......... A-8 Table D.2-11: MARC Camden Line Station Stops ................................................................ A.3-9 Table D.2-12: ARC Camden Line Trip Times by Time of Day and Direction ......................... A.3-9 Table D.2-13: MDOT MTA Commuter Bus Service from Howard County ........................... A.4-16 Table D.2-14: WMATA Metrobus Local Service in Vicinity of Proposed Mount Vernon ............... East SCMAGLEV Station ............................................................................ A.4-17 Table D.2-15: Regional Roadway Network Daily Volumes by Key Roadway Link (both directions) – By Alternative and Year – Cherry Hill Baltimore Station ................... Scenario ..................................................................................................... A.5-25 Table D.2-16: Regional Roadway Network Daily Volumes by Key Roadway Link (both directions)

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    127 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us