The Future of Allied Air Power

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Future of Allied Air Power CAN UNCLASSIFIED The Future of Allied Air Power The North Atlantic Treaty Organization Brad Gladman DRDC – Centre for Operational Research and Analysis Royal Canadian Air Force Aerospace Warfare Centre Prepared For: Commander of the Royal Canadian Aerospace Warfare Centre, Canadian Forces Base Trenton Terms of Release: This document is approved for public release. Defence Research and Development Canada Scientific Report DRDC-RDDC-2021-R104 June 2021 CAN UNCLASSIFIED CAN UNCLASSIFIED IMPORTANT INFORMATIVE STATEMENTS This document was reviewed for Controlled Goods by Defence Research and Development Canada (DRDC) using the Schedule to the Defence Production Act. Disclaimer: This publication was prepared by Defence Research and Development Canada an agency of the Department of National Defence. The information contained in this publication has been derived and determined through best practice and adherence to the highest standards of responsible conduct of scientific research. This information is intended for the use of the Department of National Defence, the Canadian Armed Forces (“Canada”) and Public Safety partners and, as permitted, may be shared with academia, industry, Canada’s allies, and the public (“Third Parties”). Any use by, or any reliance on or decisions made based on this publication by Third Parties, are done at their own risk and responsibility. Canada does not assume any liability for any damages or losses which may arise from any use of, or reliance on, the publication. Endorsement statement: This publication has been peer-reviewed and published by the Editorial Office of Defence Research and Development Canada, an agency of the Department of National Defence of Canada. Inquiries can be sent to: [email protected]. Template in use: EO Publishing App for SR-RD-EC Eng 2021-02-11.dotm © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada (Department of National Defence), 2021 © Sa Majesté la Reine en droit du Canada (Ministère de la Défense nationale), 2021 CAN UNCLASSIFIED CAN UNCLASSIFIED Abstract The purpose of this Scientific Report is to inform discussions of capability and concept development within both the Royal Canadian Air Force (RCAF) and the Canadian Armed Forces (CAF). This is the fourth in a series of reports written for the Commander of the Royal Canadian Air Force Aerospace Warfare Centre. The method adopted for this paper starts with an analysis of the policy and supporting strategy framework of, in this case, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO). Based on this understanding of the key tenets of NATO strategic thinking it is possible to identify those air power concepts and capabilities of importance to the alliance to meet the challenges of the anticipated operating environments. This analysis, in the context of the other Scientific Reports in the series, could serve a range of functions within the Department of National Defence (DND) and the CAF, from focusing RCAF capability and concept development to informing Joint Force Development Significance to Defence and Security This Scientific Report is the fourth in a larger analytical effort whose reports are being used in Canadian Armed Forces (CAF) joint-level force development (FD) activities, and have been distributed to the Five-Eyes (FVEY) joint FD organizations. When completed, this study will help to provide a focus for RCAF and CAF concept and force development. Through the development of a more comprehensive understanding of the orientation, threat perception, and capability and concept development efforts of Canada’s key allies, this analytical effort will identify areas that RCAF and CAF concept and force development communities need to explore to ensure the CAF maintains its position as a trusted and capable ally. Moreover, the general analytical approach developed in these reports, of creating and using an understanding of “future warfare” as the main method for force development across the services, has been gaining momentum within the CAF, and is recommended for wider use. DRDC-RDDC-2021-R104 i CAN UNCLASSIFIED CAN UNCLASSIFIED Résumé Le présent rapport scientifique vise à éclairer les discussions sur le développement de capacités et de concepts au sein de l’Aviation royale canadienne (ARC) et des Forces armées canadiennes (FAC). Il s’agit du quatrième d’une série de rapports à l’intention du commandant du Centre de guerre aérospatiale de l’ARC. La méthodologie adoptée dans ce rapport consistait tout d’abord à procéder à une analyse de la politique et du cadre de la stratégie d’appui de l’Organisation du Traité de l’Atlantique Nord (OTAN). En vertu de cette compréhension des principes clés de la pensée stratégique de l’OTAN, il est possible de déterminer les concepts et les capacités en matière de puissance aérienne qui sont importants pour l’alliance afin de pouvoir relever les défis des environnements opérationnels prévus. Cette analyse, dans le cadre des autres rapports scientifiques de la série, pourrait servir à un vaste éventail de fonctions au sein du ministère de la Défense nationale (MDN) et des FAC, qu’il s’agisse d’orienter le développement des capacités et des concepts de l’ARC ou d’éclairer le développement de la force interarmées. Importance pour la défense et la sécurité Le présent rapport scientifique est le quatrième dans le cadre d’un plus vaste travail d’analyse consacré aux activités de développement de la force (DF) interarmées des Forces armées canadiennes (FAC) et diffusé aux organisations responsables de ces activités au sein du Groupe des cinq (Gp5). Une fois menée à terme, cette étude aidera à orienter le développement des forces et des concepts de l’ARC et des FAC. En approfondissant la compréhension de cette orientation, de la perception des menaces et des efforts de développement des capacités et des concepts des alliés clés du Canada, ce travail d’analyse permettra de déterminer les domaines que les communautés responsables de leur développement au sein de l’ARC et des FAC devront explorer pour que ces dernières conservent leur statut d’allié digne de confiance et compétent. On recommande en outre l’utilisation à plus grande échelle de la démarche analytique générale élaborée pour les rapports de cette série. Cette démarche, de plus en plus en vogue au sein des FAC, consistait à acquérir et à utiliser une compréhension de la « guerre de l’avenir » comme principale méthode de développement de la force dans les différents services. ii DRDC-RDDC-2021-R104 CAN UNCLASSIFIED CAN UNCLASSIFIED Table of Contents Abstract ................................ ... i Significance to Defence and Security ......................... i Résumé ................................ ... ii Importance pour la défense et la sécurité ....................... ii Table of Contents ............................... iii 1 Introduction ................................ 1 2 Background and Threat Context ......................... 2 2.1 A Word on Russian Resurgence ....................... 5 2.2 Russian Military Modernisation ....................... 6 2.3 Russian Hybrid Warfare ......................... 11 3 NATO Strategic Guidance .......................... 13 3.1 The Future of the NATO Alliance ..................... 13 3.2 The 2% of GDP Debate ......................... 15 3.3 Strategic Concept ........................... 16 3.4 The Future Vector Project ........................ 18 3.5 NATO Air Power Strategy ........................ 19 4 Capability Development Expectations for NATO Member Nations ........... 23 4.1 Air Combat ............................. 24 4.2 Fifth-Generation Fighters ........................ 26 4.3 Unmanned or Remotely Piloted Aircraft Systems (RPAS) in Combat Roles ...... 27 4.4 Control of the Air ........................... 28 4.5 Command and Control ......................... 30 4.6 Attack ............................... 33 4.7 Air Mobility ............................. 35 4.8 Air-to-Air Refuelling—The Multi-Role Tanker Transport Capability ........ 37 4.9 Joint ISR .............................. 38 4.10 Manned ISR ............................. 39 4.11 Unmanned ISR ............................ 39 4.12 Maritime Patrol and Anti-Submarine Warfare ................. 41 4.13 Rotary Wing Aviation ......................... 43 5 Effective Air Power in the Context of Strategy—Joint All Domain Operations ....... 46 6 Conclusion ................................ 48 References ................................ 51 List of Symbols/Abbreviations/Acronyms/Initialisms .................. 63 DRDC-RDDC-2021-R104 iii CAN UNCLASSIFIED CAN UNCLASSIFIED This page intentionally left blank. iv DRDC-RDDC-2021-R104 CAN UNCLASSIFIED CAN UNCLASSIFIED 1 Introduction This paper is the final part of a larger analytical effort seeking to develop a comprehensive understanding of how Canada’s key allies see the evolution in warfare, with a focus on understanding their views on the future of air warfare.1 The method developed for this project, and used in this analysis, involves looking first at the subject’s strategic thinking in order to set an appropriate context with which to understand the path being charted with its investment in concept and capability development. In this instance it is not an ally but an alliance. Yet, while this complicates the analysis somewhat, an appreciation of The North Atlantic Treaty Organization’s (NATO) understanding of the threats to European and world security, as well as the challenges and opportunities to meeting those threats, will help to understand NATO’s thinking on the future of air power. This,
Recommended publications
  • NATO Expansion: Benefits and Consequences
    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers Graduate School 2001 NATO expansion: Benefits and consequences Jeffrey William Christiansen The University of Montana Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Christiansen, Jeffrey William, "NATO expansion: Benefits and consequences" (2001). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 8802. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/8802 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ■rr - Maween and Mike MANSFIELD LIBRARY The University of M ontana Permission is granted by the author to reproduce this material in its entirety, provided that this material is used for scholarly purposes and is properly cited in published works and reports. **Please check "Yes" or "No" and provide signature** Yes, I grant permission X No, I do not grant permission ________ Author's Signature; Date:__ ^ ^ 0 / Any copying for commercial purposes or financial gain may be undertaken only with the author's explicit consent. MSThe»i9\M«r«f»eld Library Permission Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. NATO EXPANSION: BENEFITS AND CONSEQUENCES by Jeffrey William Christiansen B.A. University of Montana, 2000 presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts The University of Montana 2001 Approved by: hairpers Dean, Graduate School 7 - 24- 0 ^ Date Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner.
    [Show full text]
  • Law and Military Operations in Kosovo: 1999-2001, Lessons Learned For
    LAW AND MILITARY OPERATIONS IN KOSOVO: 1999-2001 LESSONS LEARNED FOR JUDGE ADVOCATES Center for Law and Military Operations (CLAMO) The Judge Advocate General’s School United States Army Charlottesville, Virginia CENTER FOR LAW AND MILITARY OPERATIONS (CLAMO) Director COL David E. Graham Deputy Director LTC Stuart W. Risch Director, Domestic Operational Law (vacant) Director, Training & Support CPT Alton L. (Larry) Gwaltney, III Marine Representative Maj Cody M. Weston, USMC Advanced Operational Law Studies Fellows MAJ Keith E. Puls MAJ Daniel G. Jordan Automation Technician Mr. Ben R. Morgan Training Centers LTC Richard M. Whitaker Battle Command Training Program LTC James W. Herring Battle Command Training Program MAJ Phillip W. Jussell Battle Command Training Program CPT Michael L. Roberts Combat Maneuver Training Center MAJ Michael P. Ryan Joint Readiness Training Center CPT Peter R. Hayden Joint Readiness Training Center CPT Mark D. Matthews Joint Readiness Training Center SFC Michael A. Pascua Joint Readiness Training Center CPT Jonathan Howard National Training Center CPT Charles J. Kovats National Training Center Contact the Center The Center’s mission is to examine legal issues that arise during all phases of military operations and to devise training and resource strategies for addressing those issues. It seeks to fulfill this mission in five ways. First, it is the central repository within The Judge Advocate General's Corps for all-source data, information, memoranda, after-action materials and lessons learned pertaining to legal support to operations, foreign and domestic. Second, it supports judge advocates by analyzing all data and information, developing lessons learned across all military legal disciplines, and by disseminating these lessons learned and other operational information to the Army, Marine Corps, and Joint communities through publications, instruction, training, and databases accessible to operational forces, world-wide.
    [Show full text]
  • The North Atlantic Treaty Organization the Origins of NATO the NORTH ATLANTIC TREATY ORGANIZATION
    The Origins of N A TO THE NORTH ATLANTIC TREATY ORGANIZATION European Economic Recovery power production), and dollar reserves to pay for necessary and European Integration imports. The war had rent the social fabric of many nations, setting social class against social class and ethnic group n the aftermath of the total defeat of Nazi Germany in against ethnic group. Political tensions were exacerbated by 1945, Europe struggled to recover from the ravages of the participation of many Europeans in collaborationist occupation and war. The wartime Grand Alliance be- regimes and others in armed resistance. Masses of Europe- tweenI the Western democracies and the Soviet Union ans, radicalized by the experience of war and German collapsed, and postwar negotiations for a peace settlement occupation, demanded major social and economic change foundered in the Council of Foreign Ministers. By 1947 and appeared ready to enforce these demands with violence. peace treaties with Italy and the defeated Axis satellites were The national Communist Parties of Western Europe stood finally concluded after protracted and acrimonious negotia- ready to exploit this discontent in order to advance the aims tions between the former allies, but the problem of a divided of the Soviet Union.2 and occupied Germany remained unsettled. U.S. leaders were acutely aware of both the dangers of In April 1947 Secretary of State George Marshall re- renewed conflict in Europe and of their ability to influence turned from a frustrating round of negotiations in the the shape of a postwar European political and social order. Council of Foreign Ministers in Moscow to report that the Fresh from the wartime experience of providing major United States and the Soviet Union were at loggerheads over Lend-Lease aid to allied nations and assistance to millions of a prescription for the future of central Europe and that the refugees through the United Nations Relief and Rehabilitation Soviets appeared ready to drag out talks.
    [Show full text]
  • NATO at Seventy (PDF)
    PROJECT ON EUROPE AND THE TRANSATLANTIC RELATIONSHIP NATO at Seventy An Alliance in Crisis Ambassador Douglas Lute Ambassador Nicholas Burns REPORT FEBRUARY 2019 Project on Europe and the Transatlantic Relationship Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs Harvard Kennedy School 79 JFK Street Cambridge, MA 02138 www.belfercenter.org/Transatlantic Statements and views expressed in this report are solely those of the authors and do not imply endorsement by Harvard University, the Harvard Kennedy School, or the Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs. The authors of this report invite liberal use of the information provided in it for educational purposes, requiring only that the reproduced material clearly cite the source. Design and Layout by Andrew Facini Cover photo: A U.S. Marine carries cold weather equipment as he begins to march across the Icelandic terrain in preparation for NATO’s Trident Juncture 2018 exercise, October 19, 2018. (NATO Photo) Copyright 2019, President and Fellows of Harvard College Printed in the United States of America PROJECT ON EUROPE AND THE TRANSATLANTIC RELATIONSHIP NATO at Seventy An Alliance in Crisis Ambassador Douglas Lute Ambassador Nicholas Burns REPORT FEBRUARY 2019 About this Report “NATO at Seventy: An Alliance in Crisis” is a report by the Project on Europe and the Transatlantic Relationship at Harvard Kennedy School’s Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs. This Project aims to strengthen teaching, research, and policy-making on the relationship between the United States and Europe. This report is timed to coincide with the 70th anniversary of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization in 2019 as the world’s most successful alliance faces perhaps the most daunting and complex set of challenges in its history.
    [Show full text]
  • The Dilemma of NATO Strategy, 1949-1968 a Dissertation Presented
    The Dilemma of NATO Strategy, 1949-1968 A dissertation presented to the faculty of the College of Arts and Sciences of Ohio University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy Robert Thomas Davis II August 2008 © 2008 Robert Thomas Davis II All Rights Reserved ii This dissertation titled The Dilemma of NATO Strategy, 1949-1968 by ROBERT THOMAS DAVIS II has been approved for the Department of History and the College of Arts and Sciences by ______________________________ Peter John Brobst Associate Professor of History ______________________________ Benjamin M. Ogles Dean, College of Arts and Sciences iii Abstract DAVIS, ROBERT THOMAS II, Ph.D., August 2008, History The Dilemma of NATO Strategy, 1949-1968 (422 pp.) Director of Dissertation: Peter John Brobst This study is a reappraisal of the strategic dilemma of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization in the Cold War. This dilemma revolves around the problem of articulating a strategic concept for a military alliance in the nuclear era. NATO was born of a perceived need to defend Western Europe from a Soviet onslaught. It was an imperative of the early alliance to develop a military strategy and force posture to defend Western Europe should such a war break out. It was not long after the first iteration of strategy took shape than the imperative for a military defense of Europe receded under the looming threat of thermonuclear war. The advent of thermonuclear arsenals in both the United States and Soviet Union brought with it the potential destruction of civilization should war break out. This realization made statesmen on both sides of the Iron Curtain undergo what has been referred to as an ongoing process of nuclear learning.
    [Show full text]
  • NATO in the Beholder's Eye: Soviet Perceptions and Policies, 1949-1956
    WOODROW WILSON INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR SCHOLARS Christian Ostermann, Lee H. Hamilton, NATO in the Beholder’s Eye: Director Director Soviet Perceptions and Policies, 1949-56 BOARD OF ADVISORY TRUSTEES: COMMITTEE: Vojtech Mastny Joseph A. Cari, Jr., William Taubman Chairman (Amherst College) Steven Alan Bennett, Working Paper No. 35 Chairman Vice Chairman PUBLIC MEMBERS Michael Beschloss (Historian, Author) The Secretary of State Colin Powell; The Librarian of James H. Billington Congress (Librarian of Congress) James H. Billington; The Archivist of the United States Warren I. Cohen John W. Carlin; (University of Maryland- The Chairman of the Baltimore) National Endowment for the Humanities Bruce Cole; John Lewis Gaddis The Secretary of the (Yale University) Smithsonian Institution Lawrence M. Small; The Secretary of James Hershberg Education (The George Washington Roderick R. Paige; University) The Secretary of Health & Human Services Tommy G. Thompson; Samuel F. Wells, Jr. (Woodrow Wilson PRIVATE MEMBERS Washington, D.C. Center) Carol Cartwright, John H. Foster, March 2002 Sharon Wolchik Jean L. Hennessey, (The George Washington Daniel L. Lamaute, University) Doris O. Mausui, Thomas R. Reedy, Nancy M. Zirkin COLD WAR INTERNATIONAL HISTORY PROJECT THE COLD WAR INTERNATIONAL HISTORY PROJECT WORKING PAPER SERIES CHRISTIAN F. OSTERMANN, Series Editor This paper is one of a series of Working Papers published by the Cold War International History Project of the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars in Washington, D.C. Established in 1991 by a grant from the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, the Cold War International History Project (CWIHP) disseminates new information and perspectives on the history of the Cold War as it emerges from previously inaccessible sources on “the other side” of the post-World War II superpower rivalry.
    [Show full text]
  • MUNUC XXIX North Atlantic Treaty Organization Background Guide
    NORTH ATLANTIC TREATY ORGANIZATION MUNUC XXIX Topic A: The Projection of Power in Eastern Europe Topic B: The Militarization of Outer Space EXECUTIVE LETTER Delegates, It is our pleasure to welcome you to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization and MUNUC XVIII. We are Mitchell Dennis and Rachel Zucker, and we will be serving as your committee chairs. We are looking forward to a wonderful weekend with all of you. To introduce ourselves, we are both third years in the college. I (Mitchell) study Global Studies and Romance Languages and Literatures and Rachel studies Fundamentals and Economics. Rachel and I met as first years in the International Olympic Committee at MUNUC. While we are close friends, Rachel and I could not be more different. Rachel is from Los Angles and spent a year in high school abroad, while I am from Michigan and have spent most of my life in the Midwest. However, we are united by our shared experiences, our love for Interstellar, Hans Zimmer and all things brunch related. In addition to MUNUC, Rachel is involved in Money Think and Women in Law. Besides MUNUC activities, I work at the Chicago Council on Global Affairs and serve in UChicago’s Amnesty International as Secretary. The Trans-Atlantic alliance, which is represented by NATO, plays a fundamental role in post-World War II security situation. The establishment of NATO, from an American perspective, was a ground shattering event, represent America’s first foreign commitment in its history. For much of Western Europe, NATO represented the best chance for security against the Soviet Union and integration to prevent future wars.
    [Show full text]
  • Involvement of Non-Eu European Nato Members in Common Security And
    ANKARA ÜNĐVERSĐTESĐ AVRUPA TOPLULUKLARI ARATIRMA VE UYGULAMA MERKEZĐ Araştırma Dizisi No: 37 INVOLVEMENT OF NONEU EUROPEAN NATO MEMBERS IN COMMON SECURITY AND DEFENSE POLICY: THE TURKISH CASE Dr. eyda HANBAY Ankara-2013 Involvement of NonEU European NATO Members in Common Security and Defense Policy: The Turkish Case ANKARA ÜNĐVERSĐTESĐ YAYINLARI NO: 368 ISBN: 978605-136090-4 Ankara Üniversitesi Avrupa Toplulukları Araştırma ve Uygulama Merkezi, 2013 Tüm Hakları Saklıdır. Yayıncı izni olmadan, kısmen de olsa fotokopi, film vb. elektronik ve mekanik yöntemlerle çoğaltılamaz. Ankara Üniversitesi Avrupa Toplulukları Araştırma ve Uygulama Merkezi Araştırma Dizisi ATAUM Kitap Yayın Komisyonu Prof. Dr. Tuğrul ARAT Prof.Dr.Çınar ÖZEN Doç. Dr. Sanem BAYKAL Deniz SENEMOĞLU (ATAUM) Demet Halime SEZGEN (ATAUM) ATAUM Yönetim Kurulu Prof.Dr.Çağrı ERHAN Doç.Dr.Sanem BAYKAL Doç.Dr.Erdem DENK Prof.Dr.Celal GÖLE Prof.Dr.Tuğrul ARAT Prof.Dr.Erel TELLAL Prof.Dr.Fethi AÇIKEL Prof.Dr.Hasan ŞAHĐN Yrd.Doç.Dr.Đlke GÖÇMEN Murat YAPICI (Dış Ticaret Müsteşarlığı) Nazife GÜLGEN (Devlet Planlama Teşkilatı) Dr.Hakan KARABACAK (Maliye Bakanlığı) Pınar TANLAK (Avrupa Birliği Genel Sekreterliği) Kaya TÜRKMEN (Dışişleri Bakanlığı) Ankara Üniversitesi Avrupa Toplulukları Araştırma ve Uygulama Merkezi Araştırma Dizisi No: 37 ANKARA ÜNĐVERSĐTESĐ BASIMEVĐ Đncitaşı Sokak No: 10 06510 Beşevler / ANKARA Tel: 0 (312) 213 66 55 Basım Tarihi: ……………. II CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES......................................................................................... VI LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS.......................................................................VII
    [Show full text]
  • A Short History of NATO
    A short history of NATO It is often said that the North Atlantic Treaty Organization was founded in response to the threat posed by the Soviet Union. This is only partially true. In fact, the Alliance’s creation was part of a broader effort to serve three purposes: deterring Soviet expansionism, forbidding the revival of nationalist militarism in Europe through a strong North American presence on the continent, and encouraging European political integration. The aftermath of World War II saw much of Europe devastated in a way that is now difficult to envision. Approximately 36.5 million Europeans had died in the conflict, 19 million of them civilians. Refugee camps and rationing dominated daily life. In some areas, infant mortality rates were one in four. Millions of orphans wandered the burnt-out shells of former metropolises. In the German city of Hamburg alone, half a million people were homeless. In addition, Communists aided by the Soviet Union were threatening elected governments across Europe. In February 1948, the Communist Party of Czechoslovakia, with covert backing from the Soviet Union, overthrew the democratically elected government in that country. Then, in reaction to the democratic consolidation of West Germany, the Soviets blockaded Allied- controlled West Berlin in a bid to consolidate their hold on the German capital. The heroism of the Berlin Airlift provided future Allies with some solace, but privation remained a grave threat to freedom and stability. A treaty for our age Fortunately, by then the United States had turned its back on its traditional policy of diplomatic isolationism. Aid provided through the US-funded Marshall Plan and other means fostered a degree of economic stabilisation.
    [Show full text]
  • Accommodating and Confronting the Portuguese Dictatorship Within NATO, 1970-1974
    Accommodating and Confronting the Portuguese Dictatorship within NATO, 1970-1974 ABSTRACT: During the early 1970s, NATO member states such as Norway, Denmark and the Netherlands repeatedly sought to use the Atlantic Alliance as a forum to confront Portuguese domestic and colonial policies. However, the larger members of the organisation – including the USA, the UK, France and West Germany – successfully blocked their efforts. While the former expressed concern over the challenges posed by the Lisbon regime to NATO’s credibility at home and abroad, the latter sought to preserve their interests and institutional cohesion in view of the challenges posed by détente. This fault line reflected core differences in the allies’ perspectives about both Portugal and NATO itself. Drawing on extensive multi- archival research, this article examines the motivations and actions of various member states on the North Atlantic Assembly and the NATO Council ministerial meetings. It reconsiders the international dimension of the Marcelo Caetano dictatorship and the connection between the Cold War framework and the process of Portuguese resistance to decolonisation in Africa. KEYWORDS: Cold War, Colonialism, Decolonisation, Détente, NATO, Portugal 1 Introduction In 1949, Portugal became one of the twelve original signatories of the North-Atlantic Treaty. The preamble of the treaty reaffirmed the NATO member states’ ‘faith in the purposes and principles of the Charter of the United Nations’, as well their intention to ‘safeguard the freedom, common heritage and civilisation of their peoples, founded on the principles of democracy, individual liberty and the rule of law’.1 The Alliance conveniently disregarded the contradiction between this preamble and the Estado Novo regime in place in Portugal, which was a direct remnant of Europe’s fascist era.
    [Show full text]
  • NATO Expansion During the Cold War and After Evan Jaroff Claremont Mckenna College
    Claremont-UC Undergraduate Research Conference on the European Union Volume 2009 Claremont-UC Undergraduate Research Article 7 Conference on the European Union March 2012 NATO Expansion During the Cold War and After Evan Jaroff Claremont McKenna College Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/urceu Part of the International Law Commons, International Relations Commons, Military, War, and Peace Commons, and the National Security Law Commons Recommended Citation Jaroff, Evan (2009) "NATO Expansion During the Cold War and After," Claremont-UC Undergraduate Research Conference on the European Union: Vol. 2009, Article 7. DOI: 10.5642/urceu.200901.07 Available at: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/urceu/vol2009/iss1/7 This Chapter is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Claremont at Scholarship @ Claremont. It has been accepted for inclusion in Claremont-UC Undergraduate Research Conference on the European Union by an authorized administrator of Scholarship @ Claremont. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Claremont- UC Undergraduate Research Conference on the European Union 55 5 NATO EXPANSION DURING THE COLD WAR AND AFTER Evan Jaroff N ATO has undergon e five ro unds ofenlarge m ent sin ce its inception in 194 <), and it is poised to unde rgo another ro und q uite shortly, since Albania and C ro atia signe d accessio n protocols in 200tl. In order to understand future expa nsio ns, inclu ding th e proj ected entry of Albania and C ro atia, it is helpful to examine th e history of N ATO enlargement, and in particular the criteri a used to identify potential new members and th e process that they must undergo in order to j oin th e Allian ce.
    [Show full text]
  • NATO-EU Relations NATO-EU [email protected] Miroslav Řehounek #SPOLUJSMESUMMIT
    STUDENTSUMMIT.CZ XXV. ROČNÍK XXV. NATO-EU Relations Miroslav Řehounek [email protected] BACKGROUND REPORT BACKGROUND PRAŽSKÝ STUDENTSKÝ SUMMIT #SPOLUJSMESUMMIT NATO-EU RELATIONS 1. PREFACE This background report (BGR for short) is supposed to introduce you, the reader, to the topic of NATO-EU relations. It is not to be considered an exhaustive or comprehensive work on this topic but rather a summary of the most essential infor- mation. You are highly recommended to not stop your research by reading this document (more on that in the last chapter of this BGR), especially for the purposes of writing a high-quality position pa- per. Seeing that this might seem like an overwhel- ming task at first, the questions included in the penultimate chapter of this BGR are designed to help the reader to better grasp the fundamentals and also to show what to concentrate on. In case of any questions or remarks concerning this docu- ment, please contact the author at [email protected] 2 NATO-EU RELATIONS 2. INTRODUCTION At first glance, it might seem inconsequential to explore supranationally, does not help either (although foreign rela- what kind of relations the European Union and the North tions and defence matters require unanimity)1. Atlantic Treaty Orga- nisation might have as they share a majority of member states and common values at that. However, upon closer inspection, it becomes clearer that this does not simplify the situa- tion due to overlapping interests and agendas of both organisations. And perhaps most impor- tantly, the fact that one organisation is strictly intergovernmental, de- manding a consensus of all of its member states, while the other operates Picture 1: An overview of NATO and EU member states48 (based on the time of you reading this, ima- gine North Macedonia being orange) 3.
    [Show full text]