Trade Connectivity

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Trade Connectivity Chapter 2 Introduction July 2020 This chapter should be cited as ERIA (2020), ‘Trade Connectivity’, in The India-Myanmar-Thailand Trilateral Highway and Its Possible Eastward Extension to Lao PDR, Cambodia, and Viet Nam: Challenges and Opportunities. ERIA Research Project Report FY2020 no.02a, Jakarta: ERIA, pp.2-1--2-53. Chapter 2 Trade Connectivity 2.1. International Trade of India, Myanmar, and Thailand Reflecting the differences in the sizes of their economies, India, Myanmar, and Thailand’s amounts of international trade also differ significantly. India carries out the most international trade, followed by Thailand and Myanmar (Figure 2.1). Both exports and imports have grown in all three countries at different rates of change. The compound average growth rates (CAGRs) are the highest in Myanmar, followed by India and Thailand. Myanmar’s CAGRs of exports and imports between 2010 and 2018 were 8.2% and 18.8%, respectively. The corresponding CAGRs between 2010 and 2019 for India were 4.2% and 3.6%, and those for Thailand were 2.6% and 3.0%, respectively. An important characteristic of India is its large and expanding trade deficit. Although exports have been growing faster than imports, India’s trade deficit widened from US$127.9 billion in 2010 to US$159.7 billion in 2019. In contrast, exports and imports for Thailand have relatively been balanced, with a moderate degree of surplus. In Myanmar, the CAGR is much higher for imports than exports, resulting in a reversal of the trade balance from a surplus of US$4.0 billion in 2010 to a deficit of US$2.7 billion in 2018. Figure 2.1. International Trade of India, Myanmar, and Thailand Source: Compiled based on Global Trade Atlas. Chapter 2-1 Tables 2.1 to 2.6 present the top-10 export and import partners for India, Myanmar, and Thailand, respectively, together with trade connectivity amongst the three countries and with neighbouring countries, namely the Lao PDR, Cambodia, Viet Nam, Bangladesh, Bhutan, Nepal, and Sri Lanka. Trade partners with positive but the smallest records of trade are also listed in each table to indicate the degree of diversification. India’s international trade is highly diversified. The numbers for export destination and import origin are more than 230 and 220, respectively, and the cumulative share of top-10 trade partners reaches 55.0% (Tables 2.1 and 2.2). Although Thailand has more trade partners, the cumulative shares of top 10 partners are more than 60%, indicating a higher concentration of major trade partners than India (Tables 2.5 and 2.6). In contrast, Myanmar’s international trade is not diversified, both in terms of the smaller number of trade partners and the higher cumulative shares of its top-10 partners, reflecting the smaller size and the backwardness of the economy (Tables 2.3 and 2.4). However, the changes in both figures between 2010 and 2018 and the CAGRs clearly indicate that Myanmar has been in the process of rapid growth and diversification of international trade, which was triggered most likely by the transition from military to civilian rule started in March 2011. Thailand and India have been very important trade partners for Myanmar, but the opposite is not true. Reflecting the large amount of natural gas exports to Thailand through pipelines, Myanmar’s exports to Thailand exceed US$3 billion, with shares of 35.8% in 2010 and 18.3% in 2018 (Table 2.3). Thailand is also the third-largest origin for Myanmar’s imports, comprising 9.6% in 2010 and 13.4% in 2018 (Table 2.4). India is the fourth-largest export destination, comprising 10.8% in 2010 and 3.4% in 2018 (Table 2.3). Myanmar’s imports from India increased rapidly at a CAGR of 25.4% between 2010 and 2018, resulting in a rise in the share and rank from 3.3% (8th) to 5.1% (4th) (Table 2.4). Despite being in close proximity, India’s trade with Myanmar is still very limited. As India’s export destination, Myanmar had a share of 0.1% and ranked 75th in 2010 and a share of 0.3% and ranked 52nd in 2019 (Table 2.1). As India’s import origin country, Myanmar shared and ranked 0.3% and 43rd in 2010 and 0.1% and 71st in 2019 (Table 2.2). Thailand has stronger trade connectivity with Myanmar in comparison with India. In Thailand’s exports, Myanmar had a share of 1.1% and ranked 22nd in 2010 and 1.8% (17th) in 2018 (Table 2.5). On the import side, the comparable figures are 1.5% (15th) and 1.4% (18th), respectively (Table 2.6). Chapter 2-2 India and Thailand enhanced their bilateral trade connectivity from the 2010s. The CAGRs of bilateral trade are higher in both directions and for both countries than the CAGRs of total exports and imports of the respective countries. India’s exports to Thailand grew at a CAGR of 8.2% between 2010 and 2019, which is higher than the CAGR of India’s total exports (4.2%), resulting in an increase in the share from 1.0% (29th) to 1.3% (21st) (Table 2.1). During the same period, India’s imports from Thailand grew at a CAGR of 6.6%, which is higher than the CAGR of India’s total imports (3.6%), resulting in an increase in the share from 1.1% (25th) to 1.5% (20th) (Table 2.2). On the other hand, Thailand’s exports to India grew at a CAGR of 5.8% between 2010 and 2019, which is higher than the CAGR of Thailand’s total exports (2.6%), resulting in an increase in the share from 2.2% (11th) to 3.0% (10th) (Table 2.5). Similarly, Thailand’s imports from India grew at a CAGR of 8.8%, which is higher than the CAGR of India’s total imports (3.0%), resulting in an increase in the share from 1.2% (19th) to 2.0% (13th) (Table 2.6). India’s trade relationship with Cambodia and the Lao PDR remains unexploited. In India’s exports, Cambodia and the Lao PDR ranked 116th and 171st out of 233 destinations in 2010 and remained 102nd and 158th in 2019. In India’s imports, Cambodia and the Lao PDR ranked 142nd and 122nd out of 222 origin countries in 2010 and remained 121st and 168th in 2019. The shares are almost negligible (Table 2.1). In contrast, India’s trade relationship with Viet Nam has been enhanced steadily during the last decade. The share and rank of Viet Nam in India’s exports rose from 1.1% (24th) in 2010 to 1.7% (14th) in 2019. The comparable figures on the import side are 0.3% (45th) and 1.5% (19th). Despite the geographical and political proximity, Myanmar’s trade relationship with the Lao PDR and Cambodia remains very weak, probably reflecting the weak complementarity in tradable goods. In 2010, the rank of the Lao PDR in Myanmar’s exports was 72nd out of 74 export destinations, and the amount was negligible. There is no record of exports to Cambodia in 2010. In 2018, even after the establishment of the ASEAN Economic Community in 2015, Cambodia and Lao PDR ranked 48th and 125th out of 138 export destinations for Myanmar (Table 2.3). The situation on the import side is more or less the same. Similar to the case of India, Myanmar has had an enhanced trade relationship with Viet Nam during the last decade. The share and rank of Viet Nam in Myanmar’s exports rose from 0.7% (13th) in 2010 to 1.3% (14th) in 2018. The comparable figures on the import side are 0.8% (13th) and 3.0% (8th) (Table 2.4). Chapter 2-3 Taking advantage of the geographical proximity and more advanced regional cooperation framework, Thailand has enhanced trade connectivity with Cambodia, the Lao PDR, and Viet Nam (CLV). During the last decade, the shares of CLV countries in Thailand’s exports have risen from 1.2% (19th) to 2.9% (11th) for Cambodia; from 1.1% (20th) to 1.6% (19th) for the Lao PDR; and from 3.0% (9th) to 4.9% (4th) for Viet Nam, respectively (Table 2.5). On the import side, the shares increased from 0.1% (51st) to 1.0% (25th) for Cambodia; from 0.4% (30th) to 1.1% (23rd) for the Lao PDR; and from 0.8% (26th) to 2.3% (12th) for Viet Nam, respectively (Table 2.6). All three countries have become more dependent on imports from China. China’s share in India’s imports rose from 11.8% (1st) in 2010 to 14.1% (1st) in 2019 (Table 2.2). The comparable figures are 19.8% (2nd) to 32.2% (1st) for Myanmar, and 13.3% (2nd) to 21.2% (1st) for Thailand, respectively (Tables 2.4 and 2.5). China is also an important export destination for all three countries, but only Myanmar has significantly expanded exports to China, with a CAGR of 46.6% between 2010 and 2018 from 2.9% (7th) to 33.3% (1st) (Table 2.3). Thailand’s exports to China grew at a CAGR of 3.4%, which is only slightly above the CAGR for total exports (2.6%). As a result, China expanded the share from 11.0% to 11.8%, but fell from first place as Thailand’s export destination (Table 2.5). During the last decade, India’s exports to China have shrunk in terms of value, from US$17,519 million in 2010 to US$17,128 million in 2019.
Recommended publications
  • ชื่อจังหวัด อำเภอ ตำบล เขต และแขวง Changwat, Khet and Amphoe Directory
    ชื่อจังหวัด อ ำเภอ ต ำบล เขต และแขวง CHANGWAT, KHET AND AMPHOE DIRECTORY กรุงเทพมหำนคร เขตพระนคร Khet Phra Nakhon KRUNG THEP MAHA แขวงชนะสงครำม Khwaeng Chana Songkhram NAKHON (BANGKOK) แขวงตลำดยอด Khwaeng Talat Yot แขวงบวรนิเวศ Khwaeng Bowon Niwet แขวงบำงขุนพรหม Khwaeng Bang Khun Phrom แขวงบ้ำนพำนถม Khwaeng Ban Phan Thom แขวงพระบรมมหำรำชวัง Khwaeng Phra Borom Maha Ratchawang แขวงวังบูรพำภิรมย์ Khwaeng Wang Burapha Phirom แขวงวัดรำชบพิธ Khwaeng Wat Ratchabophit แขวงวัดสำมพระยำ Khwaeng Wat Sam Phraya แขวงศำลเจ้ำพ่อเสือ Khwaeng San Chao Pho Suea แขวงส ำรำญรำษฎร์ Khwaeng Samran Rat แขวงเสำชิงช้ำ Khwaeng Sao Chingcha กรุงเทพมหำนคร เขตคลองเตย Khet Khlong Toei KRUNG THEP MAHA แขวงคลองตัน Khwaeng Khlong Tan NAKHON (BANGKOK) แขวงคลองเตย Khwaeng Khlong Toei แขวงพระโขนง Khwaeng Phra Khanong กรุงเทพมหำนคร เขตคลองสำน Khet Khlong San แขวงคลองต้นไทร Khwaeng Khlong Ton Sai แขวงคลองสำน Khwaeng Khlong San แขวงบำงล ำพูล่ำง Khwaeng Bang Lamphu Lang แขวงสมเด็จเจ้ำพระยำ Khwaeng Somdet Chao Phraya กรุงเทพมหำนคร เขตคลองสำมวำ Khet Khlong Sam Wa แขวงทรำยกองดิน Khwaeng Sai Kong Din แขวงทรำยกองดินใต้ Khwaeng Sai Kong Din Tai แขวงบำงชัน Khwaeng Bang Chan แขวงสำมวำตะวันตก Khwaeng Sam Wa Tawan Tok แขวงสำมวำตะวันออก Khwaeng Sam Wa Tawan Ok กรุงเทพมหำนคร เขตคันนำยำว Khet Khan Na Yao ส ำนักงำนรำชบัณฑิตยสภำ ข้อมูล ณ วันที่ ๒๒ กุมภำพันธ์ ๒๕๖๐ ๒ แขวงคันนำยำว Khwaeng Khan Na Yao แขวงรำมอินทรำ Khwaeng Ram Inthra กรุงเทพมหำนคร เขตจตุจักร Khet Chatuchak แขวงจตุจักร Khwaeng Chatuchak แขวงจอมพล Khwaeng Chom Phon แขวงจันทรเกษม Khwaeng Chan Kasem แขวงลำดยำว Khwaeng Lat Yao แขวงเสนำนิคม
    [Show full text]
  • The Transport Trend of Thailand and Malaysia
    Executive Summary Report The Potential Assessment and Readiness of Transport Infrastructure and Services in Thailand for ASEAN Economic Community (AEC) Content Page 1. Introduction 1.1 Rationales 1 1.2 Objectives of Study 1 1.3 Scopes of Study 2 1.4 Methodology of Study 4 2. Current Status of Thailand Transport System in Line with Transport Agreement of ASEAN Community 2.1 Master Plan and Agreement on Transport System in ASEAN 5 2.2 Major Transport Systems for ASEAN Economic Community 7 2.2.1 ASEAN Highway Network 7 2.2.2 Major Railway Network for ASEAN Economic Community 9 2.2.3 Main Land Border Passes for ASEAN Economic Community 10 2.2.4 Main Ports for ASEAN Economic Community 11 2.2.5 Main Airports for ASEAN Economic Community 12 2.3 Efficiency of Current Transport System for ASEAN Economic Community 12 3. Performance of Thailand Economy and Transport Trend after the Beginning of ASEAN Economic Community 3.1 Factors Affecting Cross-Border Trade and Transit 14 3.2 Economic Development for Production Base Thriving in Thailand 15 3.2.1 The analysis of International Economic and Trade of Thailand and ASEAN 15 3.2.2 Major Production Bases and Commodity Flow of Prospect Products 16 3.2.3 Selection of Potential Industries to be the Common Production Bases of Thailand 17 and ASEAN 3.2.4 Current Situation of Targeted Industries 18 3.2.5 Linkage of Targeted Industries at Border Areas, Important Production Bases, 19 and Inner Domestic Areas TransConsult Co., Ltd. King Mongkut’s University of Technology Thonburi 2T Consulting and Management Co., Ltd.
    [Show full text]
  • Asia-Europe Connectivity Vision 2025
    Asia–Europe Connectivity Vision 2025 Challenges and Opportunities The Asia–Europe Meeting (ASEM) enters into its third decade with commitments for a renewed and deepened engagement between Asia and Europe. After 20 years, and with tremendous global and regional changes behind it, there is a consensus that ASEM must bring out a new road map of Asia–Europe connectivity and cooperation. It is commonly understood that improved connectivity and increased cooperation between Europe and Asia require plans that are both sustainable and that can be upscaled. Asia–Europe Connectivity Vision 2025: Challenges and Opportunities, a joint work of ERIA and the Government of Mongolia for the 11th ASEM Summit 2016 in Ulaanbaatar, provides the ideas for an ASEM connectivity road map for the next decade which can give ASEM a unity of purpose comparable to, if not more advanced than, the integration and cooperation efforts in other regional groups. ASEM has the platform to create a connectivity blueprint for Asia and Europe. This ASEM Connectivity Vision Document provides the template for this blueprint. About ERIA The Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia (ERIA) was established at the Third East Asia Summit (EAS) in Singapore on 21 November 2007. It is an international organisation providing research and policy support to the East Asia region, and the ASEAN and EAS summit process. The 16 member countries of EAS—Brunei Darussalam, Cambodia, Indonesia, Lao PDR, Malaysia, Myanmar, Philippines, Singapore, Thailand, Viet Nam, Australia, China, India, Japan, Republic of Korea, and New Zealand—are members of ERIA. Anita Prakash is the Director General of Policy Department at ERIA.
    [Show full text]
  • Logistics Development and Trade Facilitation in Lao Pdr
    Public Disclosure Authorized LOGISTICS DEVELOPMENT AND TRADE FACILITATION IN LAO PDR Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Prepared by John Arnold With Assistance from Dr. Ruth Banomyong and Nipawis Ritthironk Public Disclosure Authorized EDITED MAY 2003 ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS AFTA ASEAN Free Trade Area APB Agricultural Promotion Bank BCEL Banque pour le Commerce Exterieur Lao BOL Bank of Laos CAS Country Assistance Strategy CEPT Common Effective Preferential Tariff DOF Department of Forestry ETO Express Transport Organization FDI Foreign Direct Investment FIMC Foreign Investment Management Committee GMS Greater Mekong Sub-region ICD Inland Clearance Depot LFF Lao Freight Forwarder MRC Mekong River Commission ODA Official Development Assistance RCL Regional Container Line SRT State Railway of Thailand THC Terminal Handling Charge i 1. Economic Situtation.....................................................................................................................1 Background ..................................................................................................................................1 Trade and FDI..........................................................................................................................2 2. Agriculture...................................................................................................................................6 Rice ..............................................................................................................................................7
    [Show full text]
  • Asian Highway Handbook
    ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMISSION FOR ASIA AND THE PACIFIC ASIAN HIGHWAY HANDBOOK UNITED NATIONS New York, 2003 ST/ESCAP/2303 The Asian Highway Handbook was prepared under the direction of the Transport and Tourism Division of the United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific. The team of staff members of the Transport and Tourism Division who prepared the Handbook comprised: Fuyo Jenny Yamamoto, Tetsuo Miyairi, Madan B. Regmi, John R. Moon and Barry Cable. Inputs for the tourism- related parts were provided by an external consultant: Imtiaz Muqbil. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. This publication has been issued without formal editing. CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION TO THE ASIAN HIGHWAY………………. 1 1. Concept of the Asian Highway Network……………………………… 1 2. Identifying the Network………………………………………………. 2 3. Current status of the Asian Highway………………………………….. 3 4. Formalization of the Asian Highway Network……………………….. 7 5. Promotion of the Asian Highway……………………………………... 9 6. A Vision of the Future………………………………………………… 10 II. ASIAN HIGHWAY ROUTES IN MEMBER COUNTRIES…... 16 1. Afghanistan……………………………………………………………. 16 2. Armenia……………………………………………………………….. 19 3. Azerbaijan……………………………………………………………... 21 4. Bangladesh……………………………………………………………. 23 5. Bhutan…………………………………………………………………. 27 6. Cambodia……………………………………………………………… 29 7. China…………………………………………………………………... 32 8. Democratic People’s Republic of Korea……………………………… 36 9. Georgia………………………………………………………………... 38 10. India…………………………………………………………………… 41 11. Indonesia………………………………………………………………. 45 12. Islamic Republic of Iran………………………………………………. 49 13 Japan…………………………………………………………………..
    [Show full text]
  • Thailand Progress Report on the Asian Highway
    The Committee on Transport, Fifth Session Bangkok, Thailand, 07-09 October 2013 ThailandThailand ProgressProgress ReportReport onon thethe AsianAsian HighwayHighway “The Status of the Development of the Asian Highway” Dr. Siriphan JITPRASITHSIRI Director, International Highways Development Division Bureau of International Highways Cooperation Department of Highways Thailand Asian Highways in Thailand AH1: Aranyaprathet-Hin Kong-Bang pa –in (-Bangkok)-Mae Sot: 715.5 Km AH2: Sa Dao-Hat Yai-Bangkok-Chiang Rai- Tachilek: 1913.5 Km AH3: Chiang Kong -Chaing Rai: 121 Km AH12:Nong Khai-Udon Thani-Nakhon Ratchasima-Hin Kong: 571.5 Km AH13: Nakhon Sawan-Phitsanulok-Huai Kon: 550.5 Km AH15: Nakhon Phanom-Udon Thani : 249 Km AH16: Tak- Khon Kaen-Mukhdahan: 703 Km AH18: Hat Yai-Sungai Kolok: 311 Km AH19: Bangkok-Laem Chabang-Kabin Buri- Nakhon Ratchasima: 364 Km Total: 5,499 Km Shares of the Asian Highways in Thailand categorized by AH Design Standard Below Class III Missing Links Class III 0% 0% 2% Primary 4% Class II 16% Class I 78% Shares of Asian Highw ays in Thailand categorized by Surfact Types Concrete 8% Asphalt 92% Asian Highways in Thailand AH 1: Aranyaprathet-Hin Kong-Bang pa –in (Bangkok)-Mae Sot: 715.5 Km The Intercity Motorway project along the National Highway Rt.5 from Bang Pa-In to Nakhon Sawan is under the EIA approval process. The estimated construction cost is about 1,079.5 mil. USD (32,380 mil. Baht). Asian Highways in Thailand AH2: Sa Dao-Hat Yai-Bangkok-Chiang Rai- Tachilek: 1913.5 Km 1. The Intercity Motorway project along the National Highway Rt.5 from Bang Pa-In to Nakhon Sawan is under the EIA approval process.
    [Show full text]
  • LUANG PRABANGPNPCA POWER COMPANY LIMITED Luang Prabang HPP
    VOLUME 5 TBIA/CIA REPORT 115002924 May 10 , 2019 Rev 0 Only LUANG PRABANGPNPCA POWER COMPANY LIMITED Luang Prabang HPP Cumulative and Transboundary Impact Assessment ReportFor – Volume 5 Only PNPCA For VOLUME 5 CIA/TBIA REPORT 1150002924 May 10, 2019 Rev 0 Only LUANG PRABANGPNPCA POWER COMPANY LIMITED Luang Prabang HPP Cumulative and Transboundary Impact Assessment ForReport – Volume 5 Only PNPCA For Contact Pöyry Energy Ltd. (Thailand) Vanit II Bldg, 22nd Floor, Room#2202 - 2204 1126/2 New Petchburi Road Makkasan, Rajchthewi TH-10400 BANGKOK Thailand Tel. +66 2 650 3171-2 Robert Braunshofer, Business Manager Mobile: +66 92 264 0734 [email protected] Only PNPCA For Only PNPCA For “This report has been prepared by Pöyry Energy Ltd. (“Consultant”) for Luang Prabang Power Company Limited (“Client”, “LPCL”) pursuant to the Contract signed between them (“Agreement”). This report is based in part on information not within Pöyry’s control. While the information provided in this report is believed to be accurate and reliable under the conditions and subject to the qualifications set forth herein Pöyry does not, without prejudice to Pöyry’s obligations towards the Client under the Agreement, make any representations or warranties, expressed or implied, as to the accuracy or completenessOnly of such information. Use of this report and any of the estimates contained herein by anyone else than the Client (“Third Party User”) shall therefore be at the Third Party User’s sole risk. Any use by a Third Party User shall constitute a release and agreement by the Third Party User to defend and indemnify Pöyry from and against any liability of Pöyry, whatsoever in type or nature, in connection with such use, whether liability is asserted to arise in contract, negligence, strict liability or other theory of law.
    [Show full text]
  • Road Infrastructure Safety Facility Standards in Thailand Sujin
    Road Infrastructure Safety Facility Standards in Thailand Presented By Sujin Mungnimit Director, Bureau of Highway Safety Department of Highways THAILAND 3 October 2016 1. Line marking Optical Speed Bars Traverse Rumble Strips No Passing Line on Curve Object Marker 2. Centerline / edgeline rumble strip 3. Raised pavement marker 4. Flexible delineation posts Distances between delineation posts for curvature Radius of Distance between posts curvature (m) S S1 S2 S3 15 6 12 18 36 75 13 26 39 78 100 16 32 48 90 150 20 40 60 90 200 23 46 69 90 300 29 58 87 90 400 33 66 90 90 500 37 74 90 90 5. Roadside barrier and Median barrier New Jersey Type Concrete barrier 6. Safety barrier end treatment 7. Lighting High Pressure Sodium Metal Halide Rural Urban Lamp Spectrum Monochromatic color Recommended Use for lighting Super HPS LED 1. Life Time 24,000 Hrs. 50,000 Hrs 2. Cost 8,500 Baht 22,000 Baht 3. Watt 150 w. 130 W. 4. Maintenance Costs Only part Change new set 5. Frequency of Maintenance More Less Recommended Use Rural Urban 7. Pedestrian crossings Black Spot Black Spot Improvement Improvement 500 Intersection Intersection 15.5 13% Improvement Improvement 13% 300 9.5 8% 8% Road Safety Road Safety Asian Hwys Asian Hwys 100 3 Road Safety Road Safety 3% 3% Activity Activity 2800 87.5 76% 76% Road Safety Activity Road Delineator, 120 Road Delineator, 3.5 Traffic Traffic Sign Sign 220 220 Road Lighting, 480 Road Lighting, 15.0 Traffic Signal, 65 Traffic Signal, 2.0 Maintenance Maintenance Road Marking Road Marking Lighting&Signal Lighting&Signal 435 435 175 5.5 Guard Rail, 65 Guard Rail, 2.0 Bicycle Lane, 10 Bicycle Lane, 0.5 Ped.
    [Show full text]
  • Mapping the Links Between ASEAN and the GMS, BIMP-EAGA, and IMT-GT
    REGIONAL AND SUBREGIONAL PROGRAM LINKS Mapping the links between ASEAN and the GMS, BIMP-EAGA, and IMT-GT REGIONAL AND SUBREGIONAL PROGRAM LINKS Mapping the links between ASEAN and the GMS, BIMP-EAGA, and IMT-GT September 2013 © 2013 Asian Development Bank All rights reserved. Published 2013. Printed in the Philippines. ISBN 978-92-9254-202-3 (Print), 978-92-9254-203-0 (PDF) Publication Stock No. RPT135922-2 Cataloging-In-Publication Data Regional and Subregional Program Links: mapping the links between ASEAN and the GMS, BIMP-EAGA, and IMT-GT Mandaluyong City, Philippines: Asian Development Bank, 2013. 1. Regional cooperation and integration. 2. ASEAN. 3. GMS. 4. BIMP-EAGA. 5. IMT-GT. I. Asian Development Bank. The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the Asian Development Bank (ADB) or its Board of Governors or the governments they represent. ADB does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this publication and accepts no responsibility for any consequence of their use. Use of the term “country” does not imply any judgment by the authors or ADB as to the legal or other status of any territorial entity. The symbol “$” represents the United States dollar unless otherwise indicated. “Asia” refers only to ADB’s Asian member economies. ADB encourages printing or copying information exclusively for personal and noncommercial use with proper acknowledgement of ADB. Users are restricted from reselling, redistributing, or creating derivative works for commercial purposes without the express, written consent of ADB. Photo credits (cover): ADB photo archive and Josephine Duque-Comia.
    [Show full text]
  • Study on Connectivity Issues for Enhancing Coordination Among the Mekong-Lancang Countries 1
    Study on Connectivity Issues for Enhancing Coordination Among the Mekong-Lancang Countries 1 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We gratefully acknowledge the contributions of the numerous individuals and organizations involved in this study, which is an outcome of the collaborative effort between Mekong Institute (MI) and The Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Thailand (MFA, Thailand). We are highly appreciative with the incredible synergy brought by The Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Thailand in working together with us. At the outset, we would like to express our special thanks to Mr. Madhurjya Kumar Dutta (Director, Trade and Investment Facilitation Department, Mekong Institute) for his extensive guidance and invaluable comments in all stages of the study. We are also grateful to the former project consultant, Dr. Nopparuth Ruengrangskul, who played an instrumental role in coordinating and facilitating the national consultative meetings. The findings of the study stem from many discussions during those meetings. Our profound appreciation goes to the STC- NESTRA consultant team: Mr. René Meeuws and Mr. Manuel Martinez de Ubago Alvarez de Sotomayor. Without their technical expertise, hard work and dedication, the study report would not have been possible. The key success factor of the study was the cooperation of the Ministries of Foreign Affairs and other leading ministries working on transports, infrastructure and digital connectivity sectors in the six Lancang-Mekong Countries (Appendix 4). We are grateful for the meticulous insights given by each and every national delegate in the consultative meetings. Our sincere gratitude is also extended to the respective government officials who made themselves available to review the report to ensure accuracy of information.
    [Show full text]
  • Bangkok)-Mae Sot: 715 Km • AH2: Sa Dao-Hat Yai-Bangkok-Chiang Rai- Tachilek: 1,913 Km • AH3: Chiang Kong -Chaing Rai: 121 Km • AH12:Nong Khai-Udon Thani-Nakhon
    Europe-Asia Road Safety Forum and the 67th Session of the Working Party I of the UNECE, 4-6 December 2013, New Delhi, India Organized by UNECE, MRTH of India, IRTE, and UNESCAP Country Report: Road Safety and Road Signs in Thailand Siriphan JITPRASITHSIRI, Ph.D Director, International Highways Development Division Bureau of International Highways Cooperation Department of Highways, Thailand Transport Infrastructure Development National Distance per 2 lane 61,747 Km Highways Motor & Express way 313 Km (28%) Rural Rural Rd. (DRR) 42,500 Km Roads Local Administration 107,500 (67.8%) Km Waterway Coastal 2,614 Km River 1,750 Km Canal 883 Km (2.4%) Railway Single track 3,755 Km. Double track 280 Km (1.8%) Air Airport 34 Private airport 3 Military airport 1 Trend of road Accident in Thailand (2001-2011) per 100,000 population Rate per Oil consumption 1,000 mil.- Lit 22.4 22.02 20.84 20.67 20.27 19.85 18.77 18.29 16.87 16.8215.87 Death toll 10,172 in year 2011 = 15.87 per 100,000 population Death Rate per Oil consumption in1,000 mil.- Lit 2010 = 0.28 0.56 0.56 0.51 0.48 0.5 0.48 0.47 0.41 0.28 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Source: *,** Royal Thai Police *** Surveillance unit and reflects the situation of road safrty ,ThaiRoads Situation of Road Accidents • Death toll in 2011: 15.87 per 100,000 populations • Fatality Index: 0.18 in 2010 • Adolescents(15-24 years) at risk of death and serious injury • Severity Index: 13.27 in 2011 • Motorcycle accident remains the most • 3 Main causes of accident: Speed violation, Human error, and Illegal overtaking Lack of Safety awareness Illegal driving Vehicle misuse วระ กสานตกล และคณะ พ.ศ.2544 (48) High Concerns for Risk Reduction & Prevention of Traffic Accident during Songkran & New Year Festivals Road Accident during Songkran and New year 2007-2013 year No.Accident No.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 2.2. Physical Connectivity Between Asia and Europe
    Physical Connectivity between Asia and Europe A MONGOLIAN PERSPECTIVE TUMURPUREV DULAMBAZAR, INSTITUTE FOR STRATEGIC STUDIES, NATIONAL SECURITY COUNCIL OF MONGOLIA ongolia is a landlocked and mineral-rich country, sandwiched between two major countries: Russia and China. Currently, Mongolia’s foreign trade is mainly carried Mwith the two neighbours and is highly vulnerable to the volatility of mineral prices. It is recognised that development of key infrastructure, such as rail and roads, will contribute to Mongolia’s global integration, diversification of its economy, and sustainable development. Since Mongolia’s key sector is mining, transportation issues hugely influence economic efficiency. According to statistics, transportation costs alone account for 18 percent of export expenses and 11 percent of its imports. Transportation challenge hugely impacts our economy and reduces its competitiveness in the world market. The majority of Mongolian imports and exports are carried by railway, both within the country and in neighbouring countries. The main railway section of the Mongolian Railway is a trunk line between Sukhbaatar on the Russian border, through Ulaanbaatar to Zamyn Uud on the Chinese border, and has a distance of about 1,400 kilometres (km). The Mongolian Railway company carries almost 80 percent of all freight and 30 percent of all passenger transport within Mongolia. Mongolia’s railway faces difficulties in both investment and lack of competitiveness. The Mongolian–Russian Joint Venture Company ‘Ulaanbaatar Railway’, of which both sides equally own a 50 percent share, has devised a reform plan. The Government Implementing Agency Railway Authority is also trying to reform the ‘Ulaanbaatar Railway’ to fully utilise the Trans-Asian Railway network (Figure 1).
    [Show full text]