The Battle for the Roads of Britain

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Battle for the Roads of Britain The Battle for the Roads of Britain Police, Motorists and the Law, c.1890s to 1970s Keith Laybourn with David Taylor TheBattlefortheRoadsofBritain This page intentionally left blank The Battle for the Roads of Britain Police, Motorists and the Law, c.1890s to 1970s Keith Laybourn Diamond Jubilee Professor, University of Huddersfield, UK with David Taylor Emeritus Professor in History, University of Huddersfield, UK Palgrave macmillan © Keith Laybourn and David Taylor 2015 Softcover reprint of the hardcover 1st edition 2015 978-0-230-35932-1 All rights reserved. No reproduction, copy or transmission of this publication may be made without written permission. No portion of this publication may be reproduced, copied or transmitted save with written permission or in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, or under the terms of any licence permitting limited copying issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency, Saffron House, 6–10 Kirby Street, London EC1N 8TS. Any person who does any unauthorized act in relation to this publication may be liable to criminal prosecution and civil claims for damages. The authors have asserted their rights to be identified as the authors of this work in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. First published 2015 by PALGRAVE MACMILLAN Palgrave Macmillan in the UK is an imprint of Macmillan Publishers Limited, registered in England, company number 785998, of Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire RG21 6XS. Palgrave Macmillan in the US is a division of St Martin’s Press LLC, 175 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10010. Palgrave Macmillan is the global academic imprint of the above companies and has companies and representatives throughout the world. Palgrave® and Macmillan® are registered trademarks in the United States, the United Kingdom, Europe and other countries. ISBN 978-1-349-57413-1 ISBN 978-1-137-31785-8 ()eBook DOI 10.1057/9781137317858 This book is printed on paper suitable for recycling and made from fully managed and sustained forest sources. Logging, pulping and manufacturing processes are expected to conform to the environmental regulations of the country of origin. A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. A catalog record for this book is available from the Library of Congress. To Julia and Thelma This page intentionally left blank Contents ListofTables viii Preface ix Acknowledgements x List of Abbreviations xii 1 The Challenge of Automobility and the Response of Policing in Britain: An Overview of a New Vista 1 2 Historiography and Argument 25 Part I Policing Britain c.1900–1970: Enforcing the Law on the Motorist 3 ‘An Unwanted but Necessary Task’: Traffic Policing and the Enforcement of the Law, c.1900–1939 45 4 Policing the New Age of Mass Motoring c.1940s–1970: Motor Patrolling, to Q Cars, Z Cars and Unit Beat Policing 86 Part II Engineering, Educating and Channelling Road Safety 5 Engineering the Environment c.1900–1970: Congestion, Meters and Redefining the Urban Landscape 129 6 Traffic Accidents and Road Safety: The Education of the Pedestrian and the Child, 1900–1970 149 Conclusion 186 Appendices 190 Notes 195 Bibliography 224 Index 230 vii Tables 1.1 Motor vehicles in use in Britain, 1919–1966 (000s) 2 1.2 Deaths and injuries on Britain’s roads, 1919–2012 3 3.1 Selected offences (per million of population) 55 3.2 Home Office Experimental Motor Patrol Scheme, 1938–1939 56 3.3 Persons killed and injured in the Lancashire County Police District, April to March 1937/8 and 1938/9 72 3.4 Accidents to children in the Lancashire County Police District, April to March 1937/8 and 1938/9 72 3.5 Casualties (deaths and injuries) per 1,000 of the population in the Lancashire County Police District, 1932–1938/9 73 3.6 Road users killed or injured in the area covered by Lancashire County Police 73 3.7 Serious motoring offences, 1931–1938 76 4.1 Traffic wardens in England and Wales and the Metropolitan Police District, 1962–1965 95 4.2 Fixed penalty notice fines issued by the Metropolitan Police in 1963 and 1964 95 4.3 The additional traffic wardens projection in the Working Party Report on Traffic Wardens 96 4.4 Arrests with the Q-car system, 1958 and 1960 104 4.5 The enforcement of traffic law offences relating to motor vehicles, 1961–1963 116 4.6 Drink driving statistics for England, Scotland and Wales, 1966–2011 123 5.1 Traffic growth, 1962–1980 141 6.1 Road accidents in the 1920s 153 6.2 Traffic deaths in London, 1922–1929 154 6.3 Road deaths, 1938–1946 167 6.4 Road accidents and deaths of under-5s 172 viii Preface The advent of the automobile exerted revolutionary change on British society in the twentieth century, and this book examines this in relation to Britain’s roads between 1900 and 1970. There are two central debates that drive this book. The first is concerned with the declining democracy of the road in the face of ‘the new form of express train’, the automobile. The second debate, and the central focus of this book, is the role of the police in controlling the road. This book suggests that the democracy of the road was bound to decline, as the motor car drove the pedes- trian, and other road users, off the road – for motorised vehicles were indomitable and unforgiving killing machines and this implied neces- sary segregation. As for the precise role of the police in this process, and the extent to which they were complicit in the rise of the motorists, this book suggests that they sought to act in an impartial manner in enforcing the law, although they were not always helped by the magis- tracy and the courts, and that they were not the partial servants of the motorists. They adopted a three-part strategy: the three Es of Enforce- ment, Engineering and Education. In the first of these, their essential sphere of influence, the police acted as arbitrators of the road and sought to enforce the law of the land, despite the opposition of motoring lob- bies and the failures of the courts. They thus performed in the style of Gatrell’s concept of the ‘policeman state’ – the notion that the police have always sought to apply the law impartially. In the case of the Engineering and Education, their influence was much more marginal, for they were dependent on local authorities and planning authorities for the first of these, and influenced greatly by voluntary organisations such as the National ‘Safety First’ Association (NSFA)/Royal Society for the Prevention of Accidents (RoSPA) with regard to the second. Indeed, in Education, their work was very much focused on dealing with the pedestrian and the child. In the end, though, police sought to be even-handed, with Enforcement largely composed of the rules of the road applied to motorists, and Engineering and Education more geared towards saving the lives of pedestrians. The strategy worked and the road holocaust was finally defeated. However, this was achieved through the necessary restructuring of British policing and the segregation of the pedestrian. ix Acknowledgements Any academic publication owes a great debt to the generosity of others, and this is no exception. The University of Huddersfield has enabled me to gather together the government and police records, and in this respect I must thank Dr Neil Pye, who digitised many sets of annual reports that are used in this collection. In addition, I must thank my colleagues, and ex- colleagues, including Sarah Bastow, Barry Doyle, Richard Morris, John Shepherd and Paul Ward, who have all supported my efforts. Most par- ticularly, I must thank Professor David Taylor, a treasured friend and an ex-colleague with whom I was going to write this book. Snowed under with other work, he had to make a late withdrawal from the project, but nevertheless found the time to read the manuscript and to make con- structive suggestions for changes. Since some of the work included is his research he has agreed that the book should be published as authored by Keith Laybourn with David Taylor. I owe a particular gratitude to the various archivists and librarians who have provided me with help in my research. Duncan Broady, Museum Curator of the Greater Manchester Police Museum and Archives, has, with his immense knowledge of police history, been particularly helpful. I would also like to thank the staff of the Archives, Heritage and Pho- tography Service, Library of Birmingham, the Lancashire Record Office (particularly Bruce Jackson and David Tilsey), the Liverpool Record Office and the West Yorkshire Archive Service, Wakefield. The major- ity of the primary material was drawn from The National Archives at Kew, which gave me permission to draw on their document collection. In addition, I would like to thank the Controller of Her Majesty’s Sta- tionary Office (Norwich) for permission to quote from Crown copyright material. Judy Nokes was responsible for arranging this under the Open Government Licence, and also arranged permission for the use of the National Archives collections. The vast majority of this book is drawn from the primary evidence gathered in the above-mentioned archives. However, in providing the historiography of debate, I have referred to the vital secondary literature that has shaped my thinking. Every effort has been made to trace copyright holders and to avoid infringement of copyright. However, I apologise unreservedly x Acknowledgements xi to any copyright holders whose permission I have inadvertently over- looked. My thanks also go to Jade Moulds and the Palgrave Macmillan edi- torial team for their help and guidance in preparing this book, and to Jenny McCall, Global Head of History and Philosophy, Palgrave Macmillan.
Recommended publications
  • Know Your Crossings INFORMATION SHEET Facts to Share Puffins, Zebras, Toucans, Pelicans and Equestrian Are All Different Types of Pedestrian Crossings
    Know your crossings INFORMATION SHEET Facts to Share Puffins, zebras, toucans, pelicans and equestrian are all different types of pedestrian crossings. There are also traffic islands and school crossings where you may find a patrol officer who will help school children cross the road. Zebra crossing Puffin crossing The name zebra comes from the black and white stripes The name puffin comes from pedestrian on the road. They have: user friendly intelligence. • Flashing yellow beacons on black and white • Similar to pelican crossings but striped poles. instead of a green and red figure being on the other side of the road, they are next • Zig zag lines approaching the crossing. to you above the push button. • No traffic lights or ‘green figure’ to show when • They have motion detectors to know when someone is waiting to cross and Push button to cross. Wait for signal when they have reached the other side Safety tips of the road. • Because a zebra crossing does not have any traffic Toucan Push button lights or green figure, it is up to the pedestrian to Wait for signal look and listen all around for traffic, to make sure all The name toucan is based on the fact that the traffic has stopped and that it’s safe to cross. ‘two can cross’ - because these are joint pedestrian and cycle crossings. • Zebra crossings with an island in the middle should be treated as two separate crossings. • Similar to puffin crossings, a red and green cycle signal is given, as well as a red and green figure signal, as they allow both cyclists and pedestrians to cross.
    [Show full text]
  • CCEA GCSE Specification in Motor Vehicle and Road User Studies
    NOTE CCEA will NOT be accepting entries from English centres for GCSE courses that begin in or after September 2012 CCEA GCSE Specification in Motor Vehicle and Road User Studies For first teaching from September 2009 For first assessment from Summer 2011 For first award in Summer 2011 Subject Code: 3070 Version 2 04 July 2012 Version 2: 4 July 2012 Foreword This booklet contains CCEA’s General Certificate of Secondary Education (GCSE) Motor Vehicle and Road User Studies for first teaching from September 2009. We have designed this specification to meet the requirements of the following: • GCSE Qualifications Criteria; • Common Criteria for all Qualifications; and • GCSE Controlled Assessment Generic Regulations. We will make the first full award based on this specification in summer 2011. We are now offering this specification as a unitised course. This development increases flexibility and choice for teachers and learners. The first assessment for the following unit will be available in summer 2010: • Unit 2: Investigative Study. We will notify centres in writing of any major changes to this specification. We will also publish changes on our website at www.ccea.org.uk The version on our website is the most up-to-date version. Please note that the web version may be different from printed versions. Centres in England CCEA will not be accepting entries from English centres for GCSE courses starting September 2012 onwards. Final awarding for English centres currently following this specification will be in Summer 2013. A final resit opportunity for candidates from English centres will be available in Summer 2014.
    [Show full text]
  • Road Traffic Act, 1960 8 & 9 Eliz
    Road Traffic Act, 1960 8 & 9 ELIz. 2 CH. 16 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS PART I GENERAL PROVISIONS RELATING TO ROAD TRAFFIC Offences connected with Driving of motor Vehicles Section 1. Causing death by reckless or dangerous driving. 2. Reckless, and dangerous, driving generally. 3. Careless, and inconsiderate, driving. 4. Speeding. 5. Driving under age. 6. Driving, or being in charge, when under influence of drink or drugs. 7. Motor racing on highways. 8. Restriction on carriage of persons on motor cycles. Offences connected with Riding ofpedal Cycles 9. Reckless, and dangerous, cycling. 10. Careless, and inconsiderate, cycling. 11. Cycling when under influence of drink or drugs. 12. Regulation of cycle racing on highways. 13. Restriction on carriage of persons on bicycles. Offences connected with Traffic generally 14. Drivers to comply with traffic directions. 15. Pedestrians to comply with directions to stop given by constables regulating vehicular traffic. 16. Leaving vehicles in dangerous positions. Restrictions on Use of motor Vehicles off Roadway 17. Control of use of footpaths and bridleways for motor vehicle trials. 18. Prohibition of driving motor vehicles elsewhere than on roads. i CH. 16 Road Traffic Act, 1960 8 & 9 Eziz. 2 Speed Limits on restricted Roads Section 19. General speed limit for restricted roads. 20. What roads restricted. 21. Provisions as to directions under sections 19 and 20. 22. Signs for indicating speed restrictions. 23. Provisions supplementary to sections 19 to 22. Speed Limits for certain Classes of Vehicles 24. Speed limits for vehicles of different classes or descriptions. Speed Limits: Exemptions 25. Exemption of fire engines, &c., from speed limits.
    [Show full text]
  • Home Office Appraisal Report 1953-2016
    Appraisal Report HOME OFFICE 1953 - 2016 Home Office Appraisal report CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................... 4 BACKGROUND INFORMATION .................................................................................................. 6 1.2 Type of agency ............................................................................................................... 11 1.3 Annual budget ................................................................................................................. 11 1.4 Number of employees ..................................................................................................... 11 1.5 History of organisation .................................................................................................... 12 1.6 Functions, activities, and recordkeeping ......................................................................... 25 1.7 Name of the parent or sponsoring department) .............................................................. 30 1.8 Relationship with parent department .............................................................................. 30 1.9 Relationship with other organisations ............................................................................. 30 SELECTION DECISIONS ............................................................................................................ 32 2.1 Areas of Policy Work undertaken in the organisation ....................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Relationship of the Home Office and the Ministry Of
    THE RELATIONSHIP OF THE HOME OFFICE AND THE MINISTRY OF LABOUR WITH THE TREASURY ESTABLISHMENT DIVISION 1919-1946 AN EVALUATION OF CONTRASTING NEEDS NORMAN GEORGE PRICE Thesis submitted for the degree of PhD London School of Economics (University of London) 1 UMI Number: U042642 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI U042642 Published by ProQuest LLC 2014. Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 t h e s e s F 68 nu-oaaiS ABSTRACT The thesis examines three Departments of the British Home Civil Service from 1919 to 1946: the Home Office, the Ministry of Labour and the Treasury Establishment Division. The study investigates the contrasting needs, in establishment terms, of an old "Secretary of State" department the Home Office, performing a largely regulatory role, with a new department the Ministry of Labour performing an administrative role, and the relationship of both over establishment matters with the Treasury. The study assesses the roles of individual Administrative Class civil servants in the three departments from the rank of Principal to Permanent Secretary: with particular reference to the relationships existing between the Permanent Secretaries of the two departments and the Permanent Secretaries of the Treasury and their Controllers of Establishments.
    [Show full text]
  • Gypsy and Traveller Sites
    House of Commons ODPM: Housing, Planning, Local Government and the Regions Committee Gypsy and Traveller Sites Thirteenth Report of Session 2003–04 Volume III Oral and supplementary written evidence Ordered by The House of Commons to be printed 26 October 2004 HC 633-III Published on 8 November 2004 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £14.50 The ODPM: Housing, Planning, Local Government and the Regions Committee The ODPM: Housing, Planning, Local Government and the Regions Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration, and policy of the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister and its associated bodies. Current membership Andrew Bennett MP (Labour, Denton and Reddish) (Chairman) Sir Paul Beresford MP (Conservative, Mole Valley) Mr Clive Betts MP (Labour, Sheffield Attercliffe) Mr Graham Brady MP (Conservative, Altrincham & Sale West) Mr David Clelland MP (Labour, Tyne Bridge) Mr John Cummings MP (Labour, Easington) Mrs Eleanor Laing MP (Conservative, Epping Forest) Chris Mole MP (Labour, Ipswich) Mr Bill O’ Brien MP (Labour, Normanton) Christine Russell MP (Labour, City of Chester) Mr Adrian Sanders (Liberal Democrat, Torbay) Powers The Committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 152. These are available on the Internet via www.parliament.uk. Publications The Reports and evidence of the Committee are published by The Stationery Office by Order of the House. All publications of the Committee (including press notices) are on the Internet at www.parliament.uk/parliamentary_committees/odpm.cfm.
    [Show full text]
  • Pictured on Her First Day at Work: WPC Who Tripped on 999 Call Is Now Suing Her Own Force for a Prang in Her Panda Car
    Click here to print Pictured on her first day at work: WPC who tripped on 999 call is now suing her own force for a prang in her Panda car WPC Kelly Jones's police car skidded off the road as it pursued another vehicle and she is now suing her police force Panda car ended up on its side and was written off following the accident She faced an extraordinary backlash after it emerged she was suing a petrol station owner who called 999 Divorced mother-of-two has been off work on full basic pay while she recovers from that accident and tripping on a kerb By Arthur Martin PUBLISHED: 22:02, 6 April 2013 | UPDATED: 10:39, 8 April 2013 She caused outrage for suing a burglary victim after falling over a kerb during a 999 call. Now PC Kelly Jones has done it again by demanding compensation from her own force over a car crash. The constable was in a police car which skidded off the road and ended on its side during a chase in January last year. Proud: WPC Jones with her father Danny Harle on her first day as a police officer PC Jones put in a compensation claim to Norfolk Constabulary, which would not discuss details. Her lawyers said she injured her knee and her employers accepted liability. Seven months after this claim she instructed the firm to sue Norfolk petrol station owner Steve Jones. The divorced mother of two fell on a kerb while helping him look for burglars at the garage in August last year, hurting her left leg and right wrist.
    [Show full text]
  • British Intelligence, Counter-Subversion, and ‘Informal Empire’ in the Middle East
    British Intelligence, Counter-Subversion, and ‘Informal Empire’ in the Middle East, 1949-63 CHIKARA HASHIMOTO This thesis is submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy September 2013 DECLARATION This work has not previously been accepted in substance for any degree and is not being concurrently submitted in candidature for any degree. Signed ...................................................................... (candidate) Date ........................................................................ STATEMENT 1 This thesis is the result of my own investigations, except where otherwise stated. Where *correction services have been used, the extent and nature of the correction is clearly marked in a footnote(s). Other sources are acknowledged by footnotes giving explicit references. A bibliography is appended. Signed ..................................................................... (candidate) Date ........................................................................ [*this refers to the extent to which the text has been corrected by others] STATEMENT 2 I hereby give consent for my thesis, if accepted, to be available for photocopying and for inter-library loan, and for the title and summary to be made available to outside organisations. Signed ..................................................................... (candidate) Date ........................................................................ 2 SUMMARY This thesis is a history of a hitherto unexplored dimension of Britain’s engagement with the post-war Middle East with
    [Show full text]
  • If You Have Issues Viewing Or Accessing This File Contact Us at NCJRS.Gov
    If you have issues viewing or accessing this file contact us at NCJRS.gov. 1/' -:-l COMMUNITY POLICING IN THE 1980'S: RECENT ADVANCES IN POLICE PROGRAMS L-. Edited by Donald J. Loree and Chris Murphy Research and Program Ministry Secretariat Development Branch Solicitor ~eneral Canada Canadian Police College Ottawa, Ontario March 17-19, 1986 J ~ ~ mfftl:11\ft~ H § L. This Conference was jointly sponsored by the Canadian Police College, a Canadian police service of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police, and by the Secretariat of the Ministry of the Solicitor General of Canada. Published under the authority of the Hon. James Kelleher, P.C., M.P., Solicitor General of Canada. © Minister of Supply and Services Canada 1987 Cat. No. JS 42-34/1987E ISBN 0-662-15807-5 U.S. Department of Justice 108794 National Institute of Justice This document has been reproduced exactly as received from the pers?n or organization originating it. Points of view or opinions stated In this documen~ ~re tho.s.e of the authors and do not necessarily repr~sent the official pOSitIOn or policies of the National Institute of Juslice. Permission to reproduce this copyrighted material has been granted by Minister of S11pply and Services Canada to the National Criminal Justice Reference Service (NCJRS). F.urther reproduction outside of the NC"RS system requires permis­ sion of the copyright owner. The views expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of the Canadian Police College, the Ministry of the Solicitor General or any government department or agency. Egalement disponible en fran9ais sous Ie titre La police et la collectivite dans les annees 80: progres recents au niveau des programmes.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of Police Leadership and Training
    Review of Police Leadership and Training Peter Neyroud QPM Chief Constable Volume One Review of Police Leadership and Training. Dear Home Secretary, The Review of Police Leadership and Training: I am pleased to be able to present you with my Review of Police Leadership and Training, following your commission to me in August 2010. You asked for a ‘fundamental review of the current approach’ and I believe I have delivered on that ambition. I have done so by a very careful review of the evidence, a wide -ranging consultation across the police service and by drawing on the thoughtful contributions of experts here and abroad. I have concluded that, in the light of the government’s published ambitions for policing and the challenges that policing needs to meet; this is a moment for radical change in the approach to police leadership and training. The historical look that I undertook demonstrated to me that the current approach was largely designed in the 1940’s to meet the challenges of Post War Britain. It has evolved over the last 60 years, but is still recognisably the same model. Policing in the 21st century presents very tough and very different demands on the police. The government is proposing a renewal of the democratic accountability of policing, I am recommending to you in the Review report that this is matched by a new approach to the professionalism of policing. The cornerstone of my report is the creation of a new Professional Body for policing, embracing the whole of the police service and responsible for leadership, learning and standards.
    [Show full text]
  • PEDESTRIAN CROSSING GUIDELINES for TEXAS December 2000 6
    Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. FHWA/TX-01/2136-2 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date PEDESTRIAN CROSSING GUIDELINES FOR TEXAS December 2000 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Shawn M. Turner and Paul J. Carlson Product 2136-2 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) Texas Transportation Institute The Texas A&M University System 11. Contract or Grant No. College Station, Texas 77843-3135 Project No. 0-2136 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered Texas Department of Transportation Product: Construction Division October 1999 - August 2000 Research and Technology Transfer Section 14. Sponsoring Agency Code P. O. Box 5080 Austin, Texas 78763-5080 15. Supplementary Notes Research performed in cooperation with the Texas Department of Transportation and the U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration. Research Project Title: Revising the Pedestrian Warrant for the Installation of a Traffic Signal 16. Abstract The purpose of this document is to recommend guidance and criteria on the provision of safe and effective pedestrian crossings. The guidelines should be useful to engineers and planners responsible for planning, designing, operating, and maintaining pedestrian facilities in Texas. The guidelines are intended to outline the numerous alternatives that are available to address pedestrian safety problems or public concerns at roadway
    [Show full text]
  • Copyright Statement This Copy of the Thesis Has Been Supplied On
    University of Plymouth PEARL https://pearl.plymouth.ac.uk 04 University of Plymouth Research Theses 01 Research Theses Main Collection 2014 Blackshirts and White Wigs: Reflections on Public Order Law and the Political Activism of the British Union of Fascists Channing, Iain Christopher Edward http://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/2897 University of Plymouth All content in PEARL is protected by copyright law. Author manuscripts are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author. Copyright Statement This copy of the thesis has been supplied on condition that anyone who consults it is understood to recognise that its copyright rests with its author and that no quotation from the thesis and no information derived from it may be published without the author’s prior consent. 1 2 Blackshirts and White Wigs: Reflections on Public Order Law and the Political Activism of the British Union of Fascists by Iain Christopher Edward Channing A thesis submitted to Plymouth University in Partial fulfilment for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Plymouth Law School March 2013 3 4 Abstract While domestic fascism within the United Kingdom has never critically challenged Parliamentary sovereignty, it has decisively disrupted public order since its roots were established in the inter-war political scene. The violence provoked by Sir Oswald Mosley’s British Union of Fascists (BUF) was one of the stimulating factors behind the enactment of the Public Order Act 1936.
    [Show full text]