Report of the Review of Drink and Drug Driving Law Sir Peter North CBE QC Report of the Review of Drink and Drug Driving Law

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Report of the Review of Drink and Drug Driving Law Sir Peter North CBE QC Report of the Review of Drink and Drug Driving Law Report of of the Review Report of the Review of Drink and Drug Driving Law Drink and Drug Driving Law Sir Peter North CBE QC Sir Peter North CBE QC Sir Peter June 2010 Report of the Review of Drink and Drug Driving Law Sir Peter North CBE QC June 2010 Although this report was commissioned by the Department for Transport (DfT), the !ndings and recommendations are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of the DfT. While the DfT has made every e"ort to ensure the information in this document is accurate, DfT does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of that information; and it cannot accept liability for any loss or damages of any kind resulting from reliance on the information or guidance this document contains. Department for Transport Great Minster House 76 Marsham Street London SW1P 4DR Telephone 0300 330 3000 Website www.dft.gov.uk © Queen’s Printer and Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery O$ce, 2010, except where otherwise stated Copyright in the typographical arrangement rests with the Crown. This publication, excluding logos, may be reproduced free of charge in any format or medium for non-commercial research, private study or for internal circulation within an organisation. This is subject to it being reproduced accurately and not used in a misleading context. The copyright source of the material must be acknowledged and the title of the publication speci!ed. For any other use of this material, apply for a Click-Use Licence at www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/information-management/our-services/click-use.htm To order further copies contact: DfT Publications Tel: 0300 123 1102 Web: www.dft.gov.uk/orderingpublications ISBN 978 1 84864 099 3 Printed in Great Britain on paper containing at least 75% recycled !bre. Contents Executive summary 5 List of recommendations 15 Part I: Introduction Chapter 1 Background to the Review 22 Part II: Drink driving Chapter 2 Law and procedure 30 Introduction Legislative history The current law Other procedural issues The current penalty regime for drink driving o"ences Chapter 3 Evidence, issues and opinion 55 Introduction Current statistics Research !ndings Applications and implications of science Issues and opinions Chapter 4 Recommendations and conclusions 91 Introduction Interventions The prescribed blood alcohol limit Penalties for drink driving o"ences Police enforcement of drink drive law Part III: Drug driving Chapter 5 Law and procedure 120 Legislative history The current law Other procedural issues The current penalty regime for drug driving o"ences Chapter 6 Evidence, issues and opinion 133 Introduction Categorising drugs Sources of information Understanding the basis of drug e"ects on safe driving performance Medicines Other procedural issues Issues and opinions 3 Chapter 7 Recommendations and conclusions 167 Evidence of the problem Current law and process Improving the law and process: the road map High risk o"ender scheme Drug driver rehabilitation courses Medicines and medical advice Drugs and drink in combination List of abbreviations 185 Annexes Annex A Consultation questions 188 Annex B Organisations and individuals who submitted 191 written representation and evidence Annex C Organisations and individuals who gave oral 194 evidence to the Review Annex D Visits 196 Annex E Other sources of information 197 Annex F Research evidence 199 Annex G Relevant statutory provisions 203 Annex H Penalties for drink and drug driving o"ences 256 under the Road Tra$c Act 1988 Annex I Sentencing Council – Magistrates’ Court 257 Sentencing Guidelines Annex J Magistrates’ Court Sentencing Guidelines !ne bands 266 Annex K The presentation of drink drive statistics 267 Annex L Breath tests for alcohol by country 269 Annex M Code of Practice for Preliminary Impairment Tests 270 Annex N Police Forms: MG DD/E form and MG DD/F form 279 4 Executive summary The Review of Drink and Drug Driving law was requested by the Secretary of State for Transport to carry out a study into the legal framework in Great Britain governing drink and drug driving. It was asked to consider, in particular: the legal framework applying to drink and drug driving in Great Britain; the evidence on the nature of the drink and drug driving problems which the nation faces; the evidence on the impact of potential measures to reduce drink and drug driving casualties; discussions with, and representations received from, interested groups and individuals. In carrying out the Review, fundamental principles were considered: drink and drug driving are clearly activities which endanger public safety and more should be done to detect and deter those driving while impaired by drink and drugs; there should be a focus on practical steps which can deal with a significant part of the problem of drink and drug driving – the best must not be the enemy of the good; the law should command respect among the general public and the public should understand both the law and the effects of drugs and alcohol upon driving; the law and penalties imposed should be focussed on road safety (not on enforcement of wider law or policy on drugs and drink) and should reflect the degree of risk caused by impairment; the procedures involved in enforcing the law should be fair to both the citizen suspected of the offence and to the wider public who are at risk from drink and drug driving; the evidence of both the level of drink or drugs in a suspect’s body and the level of impairment should provide the best practicable indication of the levels at the time of driving; the penalties for the offences should be a deterrent, adequate punishment for the offence and should safeguard the public; any changes to the law or legal procedure need to be accompanied by appropriate and complementary campaigns of public information and enforcement. Drink driving Over recent decades there has been a welcome reduction in deaths and serious injuries on the roads, including those associated with drink driving. However, there are still some 430 deaths and 1600 serious injuries every year which are attributable to drink driving. Reduction in that number requires further road safety initiatives to be adopted. 5 Report of the Review of Drink and Drug Driving Law Improving the evidence Whilst the annual figures of road deaths due to drink driving are a reliable estimate, they are not an exact actual figure. Steps should be taken to improve the completeness of the actual figures which are available by requiring coroners (and procurators fiscal) to report all results of blood alcohol levels of drink driver fatalities. The alcohol limit There is very considerable public support for a reduction in the current drink drive limit, commonly expressed as 80 milligrammes (mg) of alcohol per 100 millilitres (ml) of blood (shortened to 80 mg/100 ml and equivalent to 35 microgrammes of alcohol in 100 ml of breath). That support is clear from the evidence to the Review, both written and oral. Furthermore, a reduction would be consistent with the approach adopted by a large majority of countries in the EU. Research evidence consistently demonstrates that the risk of having an accident increases exponentially as more alcohol is consumed. Drivers with a blood alcohol concentration (BAC) of between 20 mg/100 ml and 50 mg/100 ml have at least a three times greater risk of dying in a vehicle crash than those drivers who have no alcohol in their blood. This risk increases to at least six times with a BAC between 50 mg/100 ml and 80 mg/100 ml, and to 11 times with a BAC between 80 mg/100 ml and 100 mg/100 ml. There is a case for a reduction to 20 mg/100 ml which would be wholly consistent with a policy of “Do not drink and drive”. However, only a small minority of other countries have such a “zero tolerance” approach. It would seem to be a step too far in this country, at this time, risking the loss of public support for strengthening our drink drive legislation. A reduction to 50 mg/100 ml would undoubtedly save a significant number of lives. In the first year post-implementation, estimates range from at least 43 to around 168 lives saved – as well as avoiding a larger number of serious injuries – a conservative estimate is 280. At the other end of the range, avoiding as many as almost 16,000 injuries (including slight and serious) has been modelled. It is estimated that the impact of any lowering in the blood alcohol limit will actually increase over the first few years of implementation with an estimate of up to 303 lives annually saved by the 6th year. These figures do not fully reflect the additional lives that might be saved in Scotland who make up 7% of the drink drive-related casualties in Great Britain. While there are many uncertainties related to the data and the assumptions used in the modelling, nevertheless, they provide a helpful indication of what might be achieved by a reduction in the current limit. In the light of that, the current 80 mg/100 ml should be reduced to 50 mg/100 ml. The issue of whether to have a lower alcohol limit for young or novice drivers is the most difficult addressed in the Review. Most novice drivers are young, and there is currently a separate penalty point regime for such drivers. It is clear from the drink drive statistics that younger drink drivers create a considerably greater risk than average, both to themselves and to others. It appears that that elevated risk extends to drivers up to the age of 30 but it does not appear proportionate to apply a stricter regime to all drivers for a 6 Executive summary dozen years from gaining a licence.
Recommended publications
  • CCEA GCSE Specification in Motor Vehicle and Road User Studies
    NOTE CCEA will NOT be accepting entries from English centres for GCSE courses that begin in or after September 2012 CCEA GCSE Specification in Motor Vehicle and Road User Studies For first teaching from September 2009 For first assessment from Summer 2011 For first award in Summer 2011 Subject Code: 3070 Version 2 04 July 2012 Version 2: 4 July 2012 Foreword This booklet contains CCEA’s General Certificate of Secondary Education (GCSE) Motor Vehicle and Road User Studies for first teaching from September 2009. We have designed this specification to meet the requirements of the following: • GCSE Qualifications Criteria; • Common Criteria for all Qualifications; and • GCSE Controlled Assessment Generic Regulations. We will make the first full award based on this specification in summer 2011. We are now offering this specification as a unitised course. This development increases flexibility and choice for teachers and learners. The first assessment for the following unit will be available in summer 2010: • Unit 2: Investigative Study. We will notify centres in writing of any major changes to this specification. We will also publish changes on our website at www.ccea.org.uk The version on our website is the most up-to-date version. Please note that the web version may be different from printed versions. Centres in England CCEA will not be accepting entries from English centres for GCSE courses starting September 2012 onwards. Final awarding for English centres currently following this specification will be in Summer 2013. A final resit opportunity for candidates from English centres will be available in Summer 2014.
    [Show full text]
  • Road Traffic Act, 1960 8 & 9 Eliz
    Road Traffic Act, 1960 8 & 9 ELIz. 2 CH. 16 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS PART I GENERAL PROVISIONS RELATING TO ROAD TRAFFIC Offences connected with Driving of motor Vehicles Section 1. Causing death by reckless or dangerous driving. 2. Reckless, and dangerous, driving generally. 3. Careless, and inconsiderate, driving. 4. Speeding. 5. Driving under age. 6. Driving, or being in charge, when under influence of drink or drugs. 7. Motor racing on highways. 8. Restriction on carriage of persons on motor cycles. Offences connected with Riding ofpedal Cycles 9. Reckless, and dangerous, cycling. 10. Careless, and inconsiderate, cycling. 11. Cycling when under influence of drink or drugs. 12. Regulation of cycle racing on highways. 13. Restriction on carriage of persons on bicycles. Offences connected with Traffic generally 14. Drivers to comply with traffic directions. 15. Pedestrians to comply with directions to stop given by constables regulating vehicular traffic. 16. Leaving vehicles in dangerous positions. Restrictions on Use of motor Vehicles off Roadway 17. Control of use of footpaths and bridleways for motor vehicle trials. 18. Prohibition of driving motor vehicles elsewhere than on roads. i CH. 16 Road Traffic Act, 1960 8 & 9 Eziz. 2 Speed Limits on restricted Roads Section 19. General speed limit for restricted roads. 20. What roads restricted. 21. Provisions as to directions under sections 19 and 20. 22. Signs for indicating speed restrictions. 23. Provisions supplementary to sections 19 to 22. Speed Limits for certain Classes of Vehicles 24. Speed limits for vehicles of different classes or descriptions. Speed Limits: Exemptions 25. Exemption of fire engines, &c., from speed limits.
    [Show full text]
  • Modernising English Criminal Legislation 1267-1970
    Public Administration Research; Vol. 6, No. 1; 2017 ISSN 1927-517x E-ISSN 1927-5188 Published by Canadian Center of Science and Education Modernising English Criminal Legislation 1267-1970 Graham McBain1,2 1 Peterhouse, Cambridge, UK 2 Harvard Law School, USA Correspondence: Graham McBain, 21 Millmead Terrace, Guildford, Surrey GU2 4AT, UK. E-mail: [email protected] Received: April 2, 2017 Accepted: April 19, 2017 Online Published: April 27, 2017 doi:10.5539/par.v6n1p53 URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/par.v6n1p53 1. INTRODUCTION English criminal - and criminal procedure - legislation is in a parlous state. Presently, there are some 286 Acts covering criminal law and criminal procedure with the former comprising c.155 Acts. Therefore, it is unsurprising that Judge CJ, in his book, The Safest Shield (2015), described the current volume of criminal legislation as 'suffocating'. 1 If one considers all legislation extant from 1267 - 1925 (see Appendix A) a considerable quantity comprises criminal law and criminal procedure - most of which is (likely) obsolete.2 Given this, the purpose of this article is to look at criminal legislation in the period 1267-1970 as well as criminal procedure legislation in the period 1267-1925. Its conclusions are simple: (a) the Law Commission should review all criminal legislation pre-1890 as well as a few pieces thereafter (see Appendix B). It should also review (likely) obsolete common law crimes (see Appendix C); (b) at the same time, the Ministry of Justice (or Home Office) should consolidate all criminal legislation post-1890 into 4 Crime Acts.3 These should deal with: (a) Sex crimes; (b) Public order crimes; (c) Crimes against the person; (d) Property and financial crimes (see 7).
    [Show full text]
  • Road Traffic Act 1960
    Status: Point in time view as at 01/02/1991. Changes to legislation: There are currently no known outstanding effects for the Road Traffic Act 1960. (See end of Document for details) Road Traffic Act 1960 1960 CHAPTER 16 8 and 9 Eliz 2 An Act to consolidate, with corrections and improvements made under the Consolidation of Enactments (Procedure) Act 1949, certain enactments relating to road traffic. [22nd March 1960] Modifications etc. (not altering text) C1 Act amended (London) by London Government Act 1963 (c. 33), s. 9(6) C2 Act amended by Road Traffic Act 1988 (c. 52, SIF 107:1), s. 187(3) PART I 1—96. F1 Textual Amendments F1 Ss. 1—116 repealed by Road Traffic Act 1972 (c. 20), Sch. 9 Pt. I PART II 97— . F2 116. Textual Amendments F2 Ss. 1—116 repealed by Road Traffic Act 1972 (c. 20), Sch. 9 Pt. I 2 Road Traffic Act 1960 (c. 16) Part III – Document Generated: 2021-06-19 Status: Point in time view as at 01/02/1991. Changes to legislation: There are currently no known outstanding effects for the Road Traffic Act 1960. (See end of Document for details) PART III 117— . F3 163. Textual Amendments F3 Ss. 117—163 repealed by Public Passenger Vehicles Act 1981 (c. 14), s. 88(1), Sch. 8 PART IV 164— . F4 182. Textual Amendments F4 Ss. 164—182 repealed by Transport Act 1968 (c. 73), s. 93, Sch. 18 Pt. IV 183— . F5 185. Textual Amendments F5 Ss. 183—185 repealed by Road Traffic Act 1972 (c.
    [Show full text]
  • Transport Act 1980
    Transport Act 1980 CHAPTER 34 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS PART I PUBLIC SERVICE VEHICLES Preliminary Section 1. Preliminary. Definition and classification of public service vehicles 2. Definition of " public service vehicle ". 3. Classification of public service vehicles as stage, express or contract carriages. Road service licences 4. Road service licences. 5. Grant of road service licences. 6. Attachment to road service licences of conditions as to matters other than fares. 7. Attachment to road service licences of conditions as to fares. 8. Grant of road service licences for services on routes not otherwise served. 9. Grant of road service licences for certain excursions or tours. 10. Revocation and suspension of road service licences. 11. Duration of road service licences. Trial areas 12. Designation of trial areas. 13. Stage carriage services in trial areas. 14. Duty to publish particulars of stage carriage services in trial areas. 15. Relaxation in trial areas of operators' duties to co-operate and exchange information. Fitness of public service vehicles 16. Powers of, and facilities for, inspection of public service vehicles. 17. Certificate of initial fitness (or equivalent) required for use of public service vehicle. 18. Power to prohibit driving of unfit public service vehicles. A ii c. 34 Transport Act 1980 Public service vehicle operators' licences Section 19. PSV operators' licences. 20. Classification of licences. 21. Grant and duration of licences. 22. Conditions attached to licences. 23. Revocation, suspension, etc. of licences. 24. Duty to exhibit operator's disc. 25. Duty to inform traffic commissioners of relevant con- victions, etc. 26. Duty to give traffic commissioners information about vehicles.
    [Show full text]
  • The Battle for the Roads of Britain
    The Battle for the Roads of Britain Police, Motorists and the Law, c.1890s to 1970s Keith Laybourn with David Taylor TheBattlefortheRoadsofBritain This page intentionally left blank The Battle for the Roads of Britain Police, Motorists and the Law, c.1890s to 1970s Keith Laybourn Diamond Jubilee Professor, University of Huddersfield, UK with David Taylor Emeritus Professor in History, University of Huddersfield, UK Palgrave macmillan © Keith Laybourn and David Taylor 2015 Softcover reprint of the hardcover 1st edition 2015 978-0-230-35932-1 All rights reserved. No reproduction, copy or transmission of this publication may be made without written permission. No portion of this publication may be reproduced, copied or transmitted save with written permission or in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, or under the terms of any licence permitting limited copying issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency, Saffron House, 6–10 Kirby Street, London EC1N 8TS. Any person who does any unauthorized act in relation to this publication may be liable to criminal prosecution and civil claims for damages. The authors have asserted their rights to be identified as the authors of this work in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. First published 2015 by PALGRAVE MACMILLAN Palgrave Macmillan in the UK is an imprint of Macmillan Publishers Limited, registered in England, company number 785998, of Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire RG21 6XS. Palgrave Macmillan in the US is a division of St Martin’s Press LLC, 175 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10010. Palgrave Macmillan is the global academic imprint of the above companies and has companies and representatives throughout the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Nicholas Bevan to the University of Exeter, As a Paper Submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Publication in Law in November 2016
    On the infringements associated with the United Kingdom’s transposition of European Council Directive 2009/103/EC of 1 September 2009 on motor insurance Submitted by Nicholas Bevan to the University of Exeter, as a paper submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Publication in Law in November 2016. This paper is available for library use on the understanding that it is copyright material and that no quotation from the thesis may be published without proper acknowledgement. I certify that all material in this paper which is not my own work has been identified and that no material has previously been submitted and approved for the award of a degree by this or any other university. I have obtained permission from each of the publishers concerned to reproduce in the appendix to this paper my articles in the form in which they are presented. (Signature) Nicholas Bevan Nicholas Bevan 1 Abstract The United Kingdom (UK)’s transposition of the European Directive on motor insurance1 (the Directive) is shot through with provisions that fall below the minimum standard of compensatory protection for accident victims prescribed under this superior law. These expose third party victims to the risk of being left undercompensated, or recovering nothing at all. The author’s research has demonstrated that the handful of cases that had previously been perceived as isolated anomalies in the UK’s transposition of this European law are in fact symptomatic of a more extensive and deep-rooted nonconformity. His published articles over the past five years were the first to reveal the prevalence of this problem and the resulting lack of legal certainty.
    [Show full text]
  • Road Safety Capacity Building Workshop
    ROAD SAFETY CAPACITY BUILDING WORKSHOP March 19, 21 and 22 - 2019) Road Safety Legal Framework: context of Nepal Dr. Padma Bahadur Shahi, Email: [email protected] 1 Presentation content Introduction Road safety legal issues: Review of existing provisions of Motor Vehicle and Transport Management Act, 1993 and Rules, 1997 Road Safety Action, 2013 Way forward: in the context of Federal Structure, Proposed legal issues in Draft “Road Safety Act” 2 Theme: loss of life issue During our workshop period: Sad part of our • More than 20 people would be killed on roads in Nepal!! Hope for: • Better order, justice, change and peace in the society! • We are a part of campaign for life saving issue!! 3 Road traffic laws in UK Present laws: Road Traffic Act, 1972 Highways Act 1980 Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984 Road Traffic Offenders Act 1988 Traffic Signs Regulations and General Directions Highway Code History Locomotive Act, 1865 The Locomotives on Highways Act 1896 The Motor Car Act 1903 The Roads Act 1920 The Road Traffic Act 1930 The Road Traffic Act 1934 4 Why laws? To keep the peace in a country, Shaping moral standards, Promotion of social justice, Facilitating orderly change, Providing a basis for compromise, Helping in facilitating a plans 5 Rule of Law: principle of governance Transparency Due Proces Predictability Rule of Law Enforceability/ Accountability Stability 6 Legal Framework 7 Road safety legal framework Context of federal system: Central/Federal law: State law Local level Legal issues!! Uniformity issues!! Making more stringent
    [Show full text]
  • The Management of Road Traffic in a Rural County – Herefordshire 1919
    INTRODUCTION The transport studies of the period 1919 to 1939 in British history have largely concentrated upon the national scene and urban areas where the increase in the use of motor vehicles were greatest and their effects most noticeable. Little detailed work has been completed on rural areas in this period. This study goes some way to fill this gap in our knowledge. It will investigate the management of road traffic from the point of view of safety, in the rural county of Herefordshire, to ascertain principally through the medium of the committee reports of the County Surveyor and Chief Constable to what extent the county followed national trends. To assess the extent of the new problem the County Surveyor ascertained the level of use, the type and weight of the vehicles using the county road and centred his efforts on improving the road widths and alignment together with strengthening the road surface. Analysis of this data provides a clear picture of changing road use in the county. Attention then moves to investigate the occurrence of road accidents in the county to ascertain the effectiveness of the County Council’s efforts to provide a safe road network. Initially the study examines the social changes which occurred in the inter- war years and the effect these had on the increased use of motor vehicles in the county. Pollard has provided an analysis of the changes in economic and consequent social aspirations of the public in the inter-war years in Great Britain. He notes that there was a dual reaction to events: on the one hand there were greatly improved amenities, a widening of horizons which had been available hitherto to only a small minority.
    [Show full text]
  • Acts with Case Annotations Live on Lexislibrary Agency • Factors Act 1889 • Powers of Attorney Act 1971
    Acts with case annotations live on LexisLibrary Agency • Factors Act 1889 • Powers of Attorney Act 1971 Agriculture • Agricultural Credits Act 1928 • Agricultural Marketing Act 1958 • Agricultural Wages Act 1948 • Agriculture Act 1947 • Agriculture Act 1967 • Agriculture Act 1970 • Agriculture and Horticulture Act 1964 • Allotments Act 1922 • Allotments Act 1925 • Allotments Act 1950 • Food Safety Act 1990 • Salmon and Freshwater Fisheries Act 1975 • Sea Fish (Conservation) Act 1967 • Sea Fisheries (Shellfish) Act 1967 • Small Holdings and Allotments Act 1908 Animals • Animal Health Act 1981 • Animal Welfare Act 2006 • Animals Act 1971 • Animals (Scientific Procedure) Act 1986 • Dangerous Dogs Act 1991 • Dangerous Wild Animals Act 1976 • Dogs Act 1871 • Dogs Act 1906 • Dogs (Protection of Livestock) Act 1953 • Game Act 1831 • Ground Game Act 1880 • Guard Dogs Act 1975 • Hunting Act 2004 • Night Poaching Act 1828 • Night Poaching Act 1844 • Pet Animals Act 1951 • Poaching Prevention Act 1862 • Protection of Badgers Act 1992 Armed Forces, War and Emergency • Armed Forces Act 2006 • Court Martial Appeals Act 1968 • Distribution of German Enemy Property Act 1949 • Emergency Laws (Re-enactments and Repeals) Act 1964 • Military Lands Act 1892 • Pensions (Navy, Army Air Force and Mercantile Marine) Act 1939 • Protection of Military Remains Act 1986 • Reserve and Auxiliary Forces (Protection of Civil Interests) Act 1951 • Reserve Forces (Safeguard of Employment) Act 1985 • Visiting Forces Act 1952 Aviation • Carriage by Air Act 1961 • Civil Aviation
    [Show full text]
  • What Went Wrong? British Highway Development Before Motorways
    What Went Wrong? British Highway Development before Motorways Royal Automobile Club Foundation Motoring towards 2050 – Roads and Reality Background Paper No.1 David Bayliss OBE March 2008 In December 2007 the RAC Foundation published its report on ‘Roads and Reality’ along with a supporting Technical Report. As part of this research a series of background papers were produced and these are to be published during the course of 2008. This is the first in the series. The Royal Automobile Club Foundation for Motoring Limited is a charity established to promote the environment, economic, mobility and safety issues relating to the use of motor vehicles. RAC Foundation 89-91 Pall Mall London SW1Y 5HS Tel no: 020 7747 3445 www.racfoundation.org Registered Charity No. 1002705 March 2008 Copyright Royal Automobile Club Foundation 1 Introduction This paper looks at how British main roads were planned, managed and administered prior to the Motorway era. It starts with the pre-Roman trackways and outlines the road building activities of the Roman occupiers. It then shows how the Roman legacy was slowly destroyed through neglect and, with the onset of the Industrial Revolution, the consequent need to provide a new system of longer distance routes through the Turnpike system. With the collapse of the Turnpikes Trusts following the building of canals and, more importantly the railways, local government was charged with looking after roads in their areas. The weaknesses of this system, exposed particularly by the introduction of mechanically propelled road vehicles and the growth of longer distance travel, led to the formation of the Road Board and the creation of a ‘Road Fund’ supported by taxes on motor vehicles.
    [Show full text]
  • WJEC/Eduqas a Level Law Book 1 Answers
    WJEC/Eduqas A Level Law Book 1 answers Chapter 1: The nature of law and the Welsh and English legal systems Law making Activity 1.1 The passage of a Bill Stage What happens at this stage number 12 The Smoking in Outdoor Spaces Act 2025 receives Royal Assent. 3 Cerys Jones MP wins a ballot to introduce the Smoking in Outdoor Spaces Bill as a Private Members’ Bill. 7 The Smoking in Outdoor Spaces Bill passes through the report stage in the House of Commons. 9 The Smoking in Outdoor Spaces Bill passes to the House of Lords, where it goes through five stages. 11 The House of Commons votes to pass the Smoking in Outdoor Spaces Bill. 13 The Smoking in Outdoor Spaces Act 2025 comes into force. 8 The Smoking in Outdoor Spaces Bill has its third reading in the House of Commons. 1 A pressure group, Promote Clean Air (PCA), begins a social media campaign demanding the immediate vicinity of buildings is kept smoke free. 5 The Smoking in Outdoor Spaces Bill has its second reading in the House of Commons. 4 The Smoking in Outdoor Spaces Bill has its first reading in the House of Commons. 2 Cerys Jones MP takes up PCA’s cause. 6 The Smoking in Outdoor Spaces Bill passes through the committee stage in the House of Commons. 10 The House of Lords votes to pass the Smoking in Outdoor Spaces Bill. Activity 1.2 Types of Bills Type of Bill Explanation Example Public Bill Will affect only individuals or corporations Abortion Act 1967 Sponsored by individual MPs who are chosen Private Bill Juries Act 1974 by a ballot to present their Bill to Parliament Involve matters of public policy which usually Whitehaven Private Members’ Bill reflect the government manifesto Harbour Act 2007 1 WJEC/Eduqas A Level Law Book 1 answers Activity 1.3 Theorist Fakebook Profiles could include the following content.
    [Show full text]