DOCSLIB.ORG

Independent Review of Police Officer and Staff Remuneration and Conditions

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Independent Review of Police Officer and Staff Remuneration and Conditions Independent Review of Police Officer and Staff Remuneration and Conditions Final Report – Volume 1 March 2012 Cm 8325-I £91.00 Two Volumes not to be sold seperately Independent Review of Police Officer and Staff Remuneration and Conditions Final Report – Volume 1 Presented to Parliament by the Secretary of State for the Home Department by Command of Her Majesty March 2012 Cm 8325-I £91.00 Two Volumes not to be sold seperately © Crown copyright 2012 You may re-use this information (excluding logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ or e-mail: [email protected]. Where we have identified any third party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. Any enquiries regarding this publication should be sent to us at: Independent Review of Police Officer and Staff Remuneration and Conditions, 5th Floor, Globe House, 89 Ecclestone Square, London, SW1V 1PN This publication is available for download at www.official-documents.gov.uk and from our website at http://www.review.police.uk ISBN: 9780101832526 Printed in the UK by The Stationery Office Limited on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office ID P002482996 03/12 18037 19585 Printed on paper containing 75% recycled fibre content minimum. Independent Review of Police Officer and Staff Remuneration and Conditions The review was commissioned on 1 October 2010 by instrument of appointment given by the Home Secretary, containing the Terms of Reference specified in Appendix 14 The reviewer is– Thomas P Winsor The advisers to the review are– Sir Edward Crew QPM DL Chief Constable for the West Midlands, 1996 – 2002 Professor Richard Disney Professor of Labour Economics, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Nottingham Independent Review of Police Officer and Staff Remuneration and Conditions To: The Right Honourable Theresa May MP Secretary of State for the Home Department Dear Home Secretary I was appointed by you on 1 October 2010 to review the remuneration and conditions of service of police officers and staff in England and Wales, and to make recommendations which will enable the police service to manage its resources to serve the public more cost effectively, taking account of the current state of the public finances. In particular, I was directed to make recommendations as to: •• the use of remuneration and conditions of service to maximise officer and staff deployment to frontline roles where their powers and skills are required; •• the establishment of remuneration and conditions of service which are fair to and reasonable for both the taxpayer and police officers and staff; and •• the means of facilitating the introduction and use of modern management practices in the police in line with practices elsewhere in the public sector and the wider economy. Your terms of reference directed me to cost my recommendations in sufficient detail to enable effective implementation. As directed, my review has been produced in two parts. The first, on reforms that may be implemented in the short term, was published on 8 March 2011. I have pleasure in submitting to you my second report on reforms that may be implemented in the longer-term. Yours faithfully, Tom Winsor (sgd.) THOMAS P WINSOR March 2012 Contents Volume 1 Acknowledgements 9 Foreword and principles 11 Summary 15 Glossary of abbreviations 27 Chapter 1 Future challenges 43 1.1 Future crime trends 44 1.2 Political 48 1.3 Economies 49 1.4 Social 52 Chapter 2 Employment framework 57 Chapter 3 Entry routes for police officers 69 3.0 Introduction 69 3.1 Entry Standards 70 3.2 Recruiting Leaders 102 Chapter 4 Promotion for officers 197 Chapter 5 Health and fitness 211 5.1 Fitness testing 211 5.2 Restricted and recuperative duty 242 5.3 Police Officer Pensions 263 5.4 Ill-health retirement 278 Chapter 6 Managing the officer workforce 291 6.1 Workforce planning 292 6.2 Chief Constables’ severance 319 Volume 2 Chapter 7 Basic pay X-factor and regional pay 325 7.1 Basic pay for Federated officers 325 7.2 Basic pay for superintendent, ACC and DCC ranks 377 7.3 Basic pay for Chief Constables 399 7.4 Basic pay for staff 411 7.5 X-factor for officers and staff 423 7.6 Regional pay 446 Chapter 8 Contribution-related pay 483 8.1 Contribution-related pay 484 8.2 Appraising performance 502 8.3 Federated officers 513 8.4 Superintending, ACC and DCC ranks 518 8.5 Chief Constable rank 521 8.6 Police staff 525 Chapter 9 Role and Skill-based Pay 531 9.1 Role and Skill-based Pay 531 9.2 Overtime 560 9.3 Unsocial hours 572 9.4 On-call Allowance 581 Chapter 10 Negotiating Machinery 585 10.1 Officer Pay 585 10.2 Staff Pay 607 10.3 Police Advisory Board Issues 613 Chapter 11 Conclusions 617 11.1 Overall 617 11.2 Total costs and savings 617 11.3 Effect on the individual 618 11.4 Next steps 630 Appendices: Appendix 1 – List of recommendations 631 Appendix 2 – Phased introduction 641 Appendix 3 – The Determination of the Pay of Police Officers and Staff: Economic Analysis of the Issue for Part 2 of the Review 645 Appendix 4 – Literature Review: Performance Related Pay(PRP) and the Police – Summary of Key Findings 705 Appendix 5 – Description of police pensions arrangements 715 Appendix 6 – Description of job evaluation 723 Appendix 7 – Examples of examination questions for entry as a police officer in 1930, 1946 and 1959 727 Appendix 8 – Methodology 733 Appendix 9 – List of Submissions Received 739 Appendix 10 – List of oral evidence sessions 741 Appendix 11 – Bibliography 749 Appendix 12 – List of figures and tables 765 Appendix 13 – Policy Equality Statement 771 Appendix 14 – Terms of reference 779 Acknowledgements Acknowledgements This review has been demanding and stimulating in equal measures. When I accepted the invitation of the Home Secretary to carry it out, I did not appreciate the complexity and difficulty of some of the issues which would face me, or the magnitude of the task. I have no regrets about accepting that invitation, but I wish to record my great appreciation of those who have helped me in this work. My greatest obligation is to my adviser Sir Edward Crew, whose almost forty years’ experience in policing, and whose wisdom and judgment developed over that time in relation to this critical public service, have been placed most generously and fully at my disposal. I am certain that the task on which I embarked in October 2010 would have been immeasurably more difficult and arduous, and the nature and quality of my recommendations considerably less soundly based, without the enlightened counsel which Sir Edward has given. I also have a considerable sense of obligation to Professor Richard Disney for his outstanding work on the labour market dimension of the report, including his work for Part 2 on basic and local pay in particular. This has proved of immense assistance in understanding the conditions and dynamics of pay in policing and developing proposals which, if accepted, should last for many years to come. I wish to record also my obligation to the Secretary to the review, Mr Paul Wylie of the Home Office, without whose industry and conspicuous ability it would have been impossible for me to have issued this report. My great thanks also go to the Deputy Secretary to the review, Ms Elizabeth Allen, the review secretariat Dr Elizabeth Wright, Mr Joseph Barker, Mr Cameron Styles, Miss Joanna Keefe, Mr Jonathan Tecwyn, Miss Daniella Oliviero, Dr Hiroko Plant and Miss Carolyn Armstrong, all of the Home Office, Miss Elena Collins of the NPIA, and Miss Lucy Smith of White & Case LLP. Miss Nilima Shah and Ms Kate Bradley, also of White & Case LLP, provided considerable help in the preparation of the report for the press. I am also immensely grateful to Mr Michael Williams of KPMG, who was seconded to the review for three months in 2011, and to the partners of KPMG for their generosity in releasing him for so long. I should also place on record my appreciation of the allowances and latitudes afforded to me by my partners at White & Case LLP in relation to the considerable amount of time which this work has taken. Finally, I wish to thank all of the people and organisations who contributed to the work of the review through their written and oral representations, and the police officers and members of police staff who gave so generously of their time during my visits to police forces in England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland. I found these visits, and the opportunity to spend so much time speaking to police officers and police staff, of very considerable assistance in understanding policing and in formulating my recommendations. 9 Foreword and principles Foreword and principles 1. This is the final report of my inquiry into the pay and conditions of service of police officers and members of police staff in England and Wales. It was commissioned by the Home Secretary in October 2010. My interim report, containing recommendations for reforms in the short-term, was published on 8 March 2011. This report is concerned with the longer term. 2. The maintenance of peace, order and security is one of the oldest functions of civil society. The prevention of crime and the successful, timely and efficient apprehension and conviction of criminals, their humane treatment and effective rehabilitation, are amongst the highest obligations of the state, in discharge of its duty to protect citizens and their property.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Statement by the Police Ombudsman for Northern
    SSTTAATTEEMMEENNTT BBYY TTHHEE PPOOLLIICCEE OOMMBBUUDDSSMMAANN FFOORR NNOORRTTHHEERRNN IIRREELLAANNDD OONN HHEERR IINNVVEESSTTIIGGAATTIIOONN OOFF MMAATTTTEERRSS RREELLAATTIINNGG TTOO TTHHEE OOMMAAGGHH BBOOMMBBIINNGG OONN AAUUGGUUSSTT 1155 11999988 The persons responsible for the Omagh Bombing are the terrorists who planned and executed the atrocity. Nothing contained in this report should detract from that clear and unequivocal fact. Wednesday 12 December 2001 STATEMENT OF THE POLICE OMBUDSMAN FOR NORTHERN IRELAND IN RELATION TO THE OMAGH BOMB INVESTIGATION REPORT 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 Under the provisions of the Police (Northern Ireland) Act 1998 (the Police Act), Section 55(6)(b), the Police Ombudsman for Northern Ireland (the Police Ombudsman) may, without a complaint, formally investigate a matter in accordance with Section 56 of the Act if it is desirable in the public interest. 1.2 A Report has been presented to the Secretary of State, the Northern Ireland Policing Board and the Chief Constable of the Police Service of Northern Ireland (PSNI) under Regulation 20 of the Royal Ulster Constabulary (Complaints etc.) Regulations 2000. The public interest relates to material issues preceding and following the Omagh Bomb on 15 August 1998. 1.3 This Statement in relation to the Report on the Omagh Bomb is published under Section 62 of the Police (Northern Ireland) Act 1998 2. THE OMAGH BOMB 2.1 On Saturday 15 August 1998 at approximately 3.05 p.m. a terrorist bomb (the Omagh Bomb) exploded in the small county town of Omagh, County Tyrone, Northern Ireland. Three telephone calls were made, the first of which was at 2.29 p.m. warning that a bomb was going to detonate in the town.
    [Show full text]
  • Parliamentary Debates (Hansard)
    Monday Volume 551 22 October 2012 No. 53 HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Monday 22 October 2012 £5·00 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2012 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Open Parliament licence, which is published at www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright/. 679 22 OCTOBER 2012 680 Mr Hammond: I am grateful to my hon. Friend. He is House of Commons absolutely right. As we build our Army reserve to a level of trained strength of 30,000, it will be essential that we Monday 22 October 2012 capture the skills of regular Army leavers, not just to help us with the numbers but because of the resilience The House met at half-past Two o’clock that they will give to reserve forces. I promise him that that is what we will do. PRAYERS Nick Smith (Blaenau Gwent) (Lab): Following Labour’s [MR SPEAKER in the Chair] lead, employers such as John Lewis and O2 will guarantee to interview veterans applying for jobs. Will the Minister Oral Answers to Questions introduce this scheme to all public sector employers? Mr Hammond: One of the tasks that we have asked Lord Ashcroft to undertake is a discussion across DEFENCE Government and the wider public sector to see what more we can do to ensure that service leavers have the The Secretary of State was asked— very best opportunities in relation not only to employment Service Leavers (Support) but access to benefits and social housing—all the other things that they need. I assure the hon.
    [Show full text]
  • Policing in the 21St Century
    House of Commons Home Affairs Committee Policing in the 21st Century Seventh Report of Session 2007–08 Volume II Oral and written evidence Ordered by The House of Commons to be printed 30 October 2008 HC 364-II Published on 10 October 2008 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £0.00 The Home Affairs Committee The Home Affairs Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration, and policy of the Home Office and its associated public bodies. Current membership Rt Hon Keith Vaz MP (Labour, Leicester East) (Chairman) Tom Brake MP (Liberal Democrat, Charshalton and Wallington) Ms Karen Buck MP (Labour, Regent’s Park and Kensington North) Mr James Clappison MP (Conservative, Hertsmere) Mrs Ann Cryer MP (Labour, Keighley) David TC Davies MP (Conservative, Monmouth) Mrs Janet Dean MP (Labour, Burton) Patrick Mercer MP (Conservative, Newark) Margaret Moran MP (Labour, Luton South) Gwyn Prosser MP (Labour, Dover) Bob Russell MP (Liberal Democrat, Colchester) Martin Salter MP (Labour, Reading West) Mr Gary Streeter MP (Conservative, South West Devon) Mr David Winnick MP (Labour, Walsall North) The following Member was also a Member of the Committee during the inquiry: Mr Jeremy Browne MP (Liberal Democrat, Taunton) Powers The Committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 152. These are available on the Internet via www.parliament.uk. Publication The Reports and evidence of the Committee are published by The Stationery Office by Order of the House.
    [Show full text]
  • Home Office Appraisal Report 1953-2016
    Appraisal Report HOME OFFICE 1953 - 2016 Home Office Appraisal report CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................... 4 BACKGROUND INFORMATION .................................................................................................. 6 1.2 Type of agency ............................................................................................................... 11 1.3 Annual budget ................................................................................................................. 11 1.4 Number of employees ..................................................................................................... 11 1.5 History of organisation .................................................................................................... 12 1.6 Functions, activities, and recordkeeping ......................................................................... 25 1.7 Name of the parent or sponsoring department) .............................................................. 30 1.8 Relationship with parent department .............................................................................. 30 1.9 Relationship with other organisations ............................................................................. 30 SELECTION DECISIONS ............................................................................................................ 32 2.1 Areas of Policy Work undertaken in the organisation ....................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Relationship of the Home Office and the Ministry Of
    THE RELATIONSHIP OF THE HOME OFFICE AND THE MINISTRY OF LABOUR WITH THE TREASURY ESTABLISHMENT DIVISION 1919-1946 AN EVALUATION OF CONTRASTING NEEDS NORMAN GEORGE PRICE Thesis submitted for the degree of PhD London School of Economics (University of London) 1 UMI Number: U042642 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI U042642 Published by ProQuest LLC 2014. Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 t h e s e s F 68 nu-oaaiS ABSTRACT The thesis examines three Departments of the British Home Civil Service from 1919 to 1946: the Home Office, the Ministry of Labour and the Treasury Establishment Division. The study investigates the contrasting needs, in establishment terms, of an old "Secretary of State" department the Home Office, performing a largely regulatory role, with a new department the Ministry of Labour performing an administrative role, and the relationship of both over establishment matters with the Treasury. The study assesses the roles of individual Administrative Class civil servants in the three departments from the rank of Principal to Permanent Secretary: with particular reference to the relationships existing between the Permanent Secretaries of the two departments and the Permanent Secretaries of the Treasury and their Controllers of Establishments.
    [Show full text]
  • British Intelligence, Counter-Subversion, and ‘Informal Empire’ in the Middle East
    British Intelligence, Counter-Subversion, and ‘Informal Empire’ in the Middle East, 1949-63 CHIKARA HASHIMOTO This thesis is submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy September 2013 DECLARATION This work has not previously been accepted in substance for any degree and is not being concurrently submitted in candidature for any degree. Signed ...................................................................... (candidate) Date ........................................................................ STATEMENT 1 This thesis is the result of my own investigations, except where otherwise stated. Where *correction services have been used, the extent and nature of the correction is clearly marked in a footnote(s). Other sources are acknowledged by footnotes giving explicit references. A bibliography is appended. Signed ..................................................................... (candidate) Date ........................................................................ [*this refers to the extent to which the text has been corrected by others] STATEMENT 2 I hereby give consent for my thesis, if accepted, to be available for photocopying and for inter-library loan, and for the title and summary to be made available to outside organisations. Signed ..................................................................... (candidate) Date ........................................................................ 2 SUMMARY This thesis is a history of a hitherto unexplored dimension of Britain’s engagement with the post-war Middle East with
    [Show full text]
  • “A Peace of Sorts”: a Cultural History of the Belfast Agreement, 1998 to 2007 Eamonn Mcnamara
    “A Peace of Sorts”: A Cultural History of the Belfast Agreement, 1998 to 2007 Eamonn McNamara A thesis submitted for the degree of Master of Philosophy, Australian National University, March 2017 Declaration ii Acknowledgements I would first like to thank Professor Nicholas Brown who agreed to supervise me back in October 2014. Your generosity, insight, patience and hard work have made this thesis what it is. I would also like to thank Dr Ben Mercer, your helpful and perceptive insights not only contributed enormously to my thesis, but helped fund my research by hiring and mentoring me as a tutor. Thank you to Emeritus Professor Elizabeth Malcolm whose knowledge and experience thoroughly enhanced this thesis. I could not have asked for a better panel. I would also like to thank the academic and administrative staff of the ANU’s School of History for their encouragement and support, in Monday afternoon tea, seminars throughout my candidature and especially useful feedback during my Thesis Proposal and Pre-Submission Presentations. I would like to thank the McClay Library at Queen’s University Belfast for allowing me access to their collections and the generous staff of the Linen Hall Library, Belfast City Library and Belfast’s Newspaper Library for all their help. Also thanks to my local libraries, the NLA and the ANU’s Chifley and Menzies libraries. A big thank you to Niamh Baker of the BBC Archives in Belfast for allowing me access to the collection. I would also like to acknowledge Bertie Ahern, Seán Neeson and John Lindsay for their insightful interviews and conversations that added a personal dimension to this thesis.
    [Show full text]
  • To Serve Without Favor
    TO SERVE WITHOUT FAVOR Policing, Human Rights, and Accountability in Northern Ireland Human Rights Watch/Helsinki Human Rights Watch New York AAA Washington AAA London AAA Brussels Copyright 8 May 1997 by Human Rights Watch All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. ISBN 1-56432-216-5 Library of Congress Catalog Card Number: 97-73331 Cover photograph copyright 8 1996 by Oistín Mac Bride. RUC riot squad in Drumcree. Addresses for Human Rights Watch 485 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10017-6104 Tel: (212) 972-8400, Fax: (212) 972-0905, E-mail: [email protected] 1522 K Street, N.W., #910, Washington, DC 20005-1202 Tel: (202) 371-6592, Fax: (202) 371-0124, E-mail: [email protected] 33 Islington High Street, N1 9LH London, UK Tel: (171) 713-1995, Fax: (171) 713-1800, E-mail: [email protected] 15 Rue Van Campenhout, 1000 Brussels, Belgium Tel: (2) 732-2009, Fax: (2) 732-0471, E-mail: [email protected] Web Site Address: http://www.hrw.org Gopher Address://gopher.humanrights.org:5000/11/int/Human Rights Watch Listserv address: To subscribe to the list, send an e-mail message to [email protected] with Asubscribe Human Rights Watch-news@ in the body of the message (leave the subject line blank). HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH Human Rights Watch conducts regular, systematic investigations of human rights abuses in some seventy countries around the world. Our reputation for timely, reliable disclosures has made us an essential source of information for those concerned with human rights. We address the human rights practices of governments of all political stripes, of all geopolitical alignments, and of all ethnic and religious persuasions.
    [Show full text]
  • Shared Space 88 Text Pages
    17 Organisational Change under Environmental Pressure: Policing 1 Change in Northern Ireland Joanne Murphy Introduction Organisational change is a widely studied and complex phenomenon. When the change process in question is forced to interact in ‘real time’ with a fast moving external environment, the nature of the case makes for a useful case study of change in conditions of environmental turbulence. It also has the potential to contain lessons for other organisations facing elements of these challenges. This paper sets out to analyze the radical organizational change process that occurred within policing in Northern Ireland in the aftermath of the Belfast Agreement, in conditions of political, social and organisational unrest. It sets the change process within its wider context, looks at the interaction between the organization and the environment, and the process by which it reinvented itself to fit a new political dispensation. Environmental Conditions As Pettigrew asserts often in his work on organisational change and strategy, it is not possible to understand the process of change without a 2 thorough understanding of the context in which change occurs. The challenges posed to the RUC at the beginning of this process of change were deeply rooted in the history, culture, politics and identity of the RUC as an organisation. This in turn was just as deeply embedded in the history, politics, violence and conflicting identities that made up Northern Ireland’s divided society. As with other divided societies, policing and the 3 operation of the justice process is a key issue of contention. The partition of Ireland in May 1921 had seen not only the division of the island’s territory into North and South but also the division of its existing police force.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of Police Leadership and Training
    Review of Police Leadership and Training Peter Neyroud QPM Chief Constable Volume One Review of Police Leadership and Training. Dear Home Secretary, The Review of Police Leadership and Training: I am pleased to be able to present you with my Review of Police Leadership and Training, following your commission to me in August 2010. You asked for a ‘fundamental review of the current approach’ and I believe I have delivered on that ambition. I have done so by a very careful review of the evidence, a wide -ranging consultation across the police service and by drawing on the thoughtful contributions of experts here and abroad. I have concluded that, in the light of the government’s published ambitions for policing and the challenges that policing needs to meet; this is a moment for radical change in the approach to police leadership and training. The historical look that I undertook demonstrated to me that the current approach was largely designed in the 1940’s to meet the challenges of Post War Britain. It has evolved over the last 60 years, but is still recognisably the same model. Policing in the 21st century presents very tough and very different demands on the police. The government is proposing a renewal of the democratic accountability of policing, I am recommending to you in the Review report that this is matched by a new approach to the professionalism of policing. The cornerstone of my report is the creation of a new Professional Body for policing, embracing the whole of the police service and responsible for leadership, learning and standards.
    [Show full text]
  • Copyright Statement This Copy of the Thesis Has Been Supplied On
    University of Plymouth PEARL https://pearl.plymouth.ac.uk 04 University of Plymouth Research Theses 01 Research Theses Main Collection 2014 Blackshirts and White Wigs: Reflections on Public Order Law and the Political Activism of the British Union of Fascists Channing, Iain Christopher Edward http://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/2897 University of Plymouth All content in PEARL is protected by copyright law. Author manuscripts are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author. Copyright Statement This copy of the thesis has been supplied on condition that anyone who consults it is understood to recognise that its copyright rests with its author and that no quotation from the thesis and no information derived from it may be published without the author’s prior consent. 1 2 Blackshirts and White Wigs: Reflections on Public Order Law and the Political Activism of the British Union of Fascists by Iain Christopher Edward Channing A thesis submitted to Plymouth University in Partial fulfilment for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Plymouth Law School March 2013 3 4 Abstract While domestic fascism within the United Kingdom has never critically challenged Parliamentary sovereignty, it has decisively disrupted public order since its roots were established in the inter-war political scene. The violence provoked by Sir Oswald Mosley’s British Union of Fascists (BUF) was one of the stimulating factors behind the enactment of the Public Order Act 1936.
    [Show full text]
  • Protecting Human Rights and Securing Peace in Northern Ireland: the Vital Role of Police Reform
    PROTECTING HUMAN RIGHTS AND SECURING PEACE IN NORTHERN IRELAND: THE VITAL ROLE OF POLICE REFORM HEARING BEFORE THE COMMISSION ON SECURITY AND COOPERATION IN EUROPE ONE HUNDRED SIXTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION SEPTEMBER 22, 2000 Printed for the use of the Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe [CSCE 106-2-14] Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.house.gov/csce 67223EC U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON : 2000 COMMISSION ON SECURITY AND COOPERATION IN EUROPE LEGISLATIVE BRANCH COMMISSIONERS HOUSE SENATE CHRISTOPHER H. SMITH, New Jersey BEN NIGHTHORSE CAMPBELL, Colorado Chairman Co-Chairman FRANK R. WOLF, Virginia KAY BAILEY HUTCHISON, Texas MATT SALMON, Arizona SPENCER ABRAHAM, Michigan JAMES C. GREENWOOD, Pennsylvania SAM BROWNBACK, Kansas JOSEPH R. PITTS, Pennsylvania TIM HUTCHINSON, Arkansas STENY H. HOYER, Maryland FRANK R. LAUTENBERG, New Jersey BENJAMIN L. CARDIN, Maryland BOB GRAHAM, Florida LOUISE McINTOSH SLAUGHTER, New York RUSSELL D. FEINGOLD, Wisconsin MICHAEL P. FORBES, New York CHRISTOPHER J. DODD, Connecticut EXECUTIVE BRANCH COMMISSIONERS HAROLD HONGJU KOH, Department of State DR. EDWARD L. WARNER III, Department of Defense PATRICK A. MULLOY, Department of Commerce COMMISSION S TAFF DOROTHY DOUGLAS TAFT, Chief of Staff RONALD J. MCNAMARA, Deputy Chief of Staff (VACANT), Senior Advisor BEN ANDERSON, Communications Director OREST DEYCHAKIWSKY, Staff Advisor JOHN F. FINERTY, Staff Advisor CHADWICK R. GORE, Staff Advisor ROBERT HAND, Staff Advisor JANICE HELWIG, Staff Advisor MARLENE KAUFMANN, Counsel KAREN S. LORD, Counsel for Freedom of Religion MICHELE MADASZ, Office Manager MICHAEL J. OCHS, Staff Advisor ERIKA B. SCHLAGER, Counsel for International Law MAUREEN T. WALSH, General Counsel ASHLEY WILSON, Staff Assistant/Systems Administrator (ii) PROTECTING HUMAN RIGHTS AND SECURING PEACE IN NORTHERN IRELAND: THE VITAL ROLE OF POLICE REFORM SEPTEMBER 22, 2000 OPENING STATEMENTS PAGE Hon.
    [Show full text]