DOCSLIB.ORG

Midland Highway Safety Package

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Midland Highway Safety Package Tasmanian Government 2012 Submission to Nation Building 2 Program Midland Highway Safety Package September 2012 Department of Infrastructure, Energy and Resources Priority assigned by jurisdiction for NB2 Priority one under Safety funding consideration Details of full scope of project, including objectives, service requirements, project Information on project objectives, strategic status and project phase(s) seeking context and options analysis is discussed in funding. the Stage 1-6 template. Note: It is expected that this will be largely Information on the technical and delivery addressed through the main IA submission. aspects of the project, including benefit cost However, the Department requires cost analysis, project risks and delivery program is estimates to be provided using the Best discussed in the Stage 7 template. Practice Cost Estimation Standard and at BCRs for the major junctions of Oatlands both P50 and P90. Also to use both 4% Northern Access, Esk Main Road, Mudwalls and 7% for BCRs. Road, and Kempton South Access are: • Discount Rate (7%) and P50: 0.32. • Discount Rate (7%) and P90: 0.30. • Discount Rate (4%) and P50: 0.52. • Discount Rate (4%) and P90: 0.48. BCRs for the realignment and upgrades for South of Tunbridge, St Peters Pass, and White Lagoon are: • Discount Rate (7%) and P50: 0.57. • Discount Rate (7%) and P90: 0.51. • Discount Rate (4%) and P50: 0.90. • Discount Rate (4%) and P90: 0.81. BCRs for Conara - removal of at grade rail crossing, Realignments and upgrades, and Streetscaping Campbell Town and Perth to follow with stage 7 template. Alignment with objectives of NB2 The Midland Highway Safety Package aligns Note: This should include how a project with the Safety theme, and along with the aligns with the overarching objective of Moving Freight and Moving People of Nation NB2, as well as how it aligns with the Building 2. objective of each relevant NB2 subprogram. The Midland Highway is a critical freight connection facilitating access from the Southern region to the State’s northern ports, and the major transport link for passengers travelling between the northern and southern regions. The Tasmanian Government has identified a package of improvements to improve safety and efficiency. 1 | Page As part of this Package, sixteen individual safety projects have been identified at key junctions, along key sections and through major towns, consistent with priorities identified in the Midland Highway Partnership Agreement 2009. The projects are: • Major junction upgrades: Oatlands Northern Access, Esk Main Road, Mud Walls Road, Kempton South Access • Removal of at-grade rail crossing: Conara • Realignments/upgrade of existing alignment: South of Tunbridge, St Peters Pass, White Lagoon • Minor junctions: Mood Food, Sorell Springs Road, Stonor Road, Auburn Road and Ashby Road, Lower Marshes Road, Mona Vale • Streetscaping: Campbell Town and Perth Further details are contained under Goal Definition (Stage 1 - 6 template). Alignment with broader Commonwealth and state/territory policies and plans The project aligns with a number of Infrastructure Australia’s strategic priorities, Note: Specific plans/policies to be including: addressed (at a minimum) include the Commonwealth’s Infrastructure Investment • Increase Australia’s productivity Framework; the National Urban Policy; the • Developing Australia’s cities and regions National Ports and Land Freight Strategies; • Improve social equity, and quality of life, and the Australian Government in our cities and our regions commitment on the incorporation of ITS for major urban roads (as appropriate). Further details are contained under Goal Definition (Stage1-6 template). Overall financial exposure including Full details of cost estimates are outlined in identification of other partner funding the submission. Note: It is expected that this will be addressed in the main IA submission. Identification of key strategic risks to the A Risk Management Register has been project developed for the project. Risks are detailed in the submission under Costs, Risks and Note: It is expected that this will be Funding (Stage 7 template). addressed in the main IA submission Quantification of the expected benefits Project benefits are outlined in the Stage 7 2 | Page from the proposal template. Note: It is expected that this will be addressed in the main IA submission. Information regarding the extent to The need for Government funding is which the potential for private sector discussed in the Stage 7 template. involvement or investment has been evaluated Note: It is expected that this will be addressed in the main IA submission. Likely impacts from the project proposal Further details on the impacts are outlined in on citizens and the market Problem Identification, Assessment and Analysis (Stage 1-6 template). Note: Detail is needed on how each proposal will impact citizens and the market (as two distinct groups) – positively or negatively, and the extent of the impact Identification of key stakeholders in the Further details on key stakeholders and project and the complexity of relationships are discussed in the Stage 7 stakeholder relationships template. Extent of multijurisdictional and/or No other jurisdictions or private sector entities private sector involvement in the involved in developing this proposal. proposal Details of the level of innovation and An ITS solution is not considered to be information technology involved in the applicable to this issue. proposal, including in relation to information technology requirements to successfully manage/implement the proposal Note: Detail is to include identification of any new/untried methodologies or technologies to be used in the project, as well as IT requirements for the proponent agency to successfully manage or implement the proposal. Details of the proposed procurement Procurement methods for the proposal are methods for the proposal discussed in the Stage 7 template. Note: It is expected that this will be addressed in the main IA submission. Level of complexity in construction, and Further details on construction and related any known issues in relation to the issues are discussed in the Stage 7 template. construction of the project, including environmental and heritage considerations 3 | Page Note: It is expected that this will be largely addressed through the main IA submission. However, the Department requires sufficient detail to fulfil its probity and accountability requirements, so any additional information not explicitly addressed in the main IA submission should be provided here. Any known issues in relation to There are no foreseen contractual or service contractual or service delivery delivery issues. obligations stemming from the proposal Note: This is to include any issues that are not currently present but could reasonably be foreseen. Details of the proposed governance The governance model for this project is arrangements for the proposal outlined in the Stage 7 template. Note: This should be largely addressed in the main IA submission. However, the Department requires an explicit statement about the experience of the management team in delivering similar proposals and whether there are any expected knowledge gaps or training needs to successfully implement the proposal. Details of the proposed delivery The delivery timetable is outlined in the timetables and whether there are any submission. known challenges to achieving those timeframes Note: It is expected that this will be addressed in the main IA submission. Details of any significant The key interdependencies for the project are interdependencies for the project outlined in the Stage 7 template. Note: It is expected that this will be addressed in the main IA submission. 4 | Page Proposal Summary Initiative Name: Midland Highway Safety Package Location (State/Region(or City)/ Perth to Kempton, Tasmania Locality): Name of Proponent Entity: Tasmanian Department of Infrastructure, Energy and Resources Contact (Name, Position, phone/e- David Spence, General Manager Infrastructure Strategy mail): Department of Infrastructure, Energy and Resources Tel: (03) 6233 2089 Email: [email protected] Executive summary The Midland Highway is part of the National Land Transport Network in Tasmania, an integrated network of land transport links within national and inter-regional land transport corridors that are of critical importance to national and regional growth. The Highway is both a critical freight connection facilitating access from the Southern region to the State’s northern ports, and the major transport link for passengers travelling between the northern and southern regions. In 2009, the Highway carried an average of around 2 million tonnes of freight, which is forecast to increase to 3.8 million tonnes by 2030. The Tasmanian Government has identified a package of improvements to the Highway over the short (0-5 years), medium (5-10 years) and long-term (10-25 years) to improve safety and efficiency. The Midland Highway Improvement Projects are designed to improve efficiency and safety across the Highway. Some of these improvements are underway and will shortly be delivered – Brighton Bypass and Brighton Transport Hub – while others are in the final planning and development phase – Bagdad Bypass and New Bridgewater Bridge. As part of this Package, sixteen individual safety projects have been identified as part of a whole of corridor proposal to improve safety at key junctions, along key sections and through major towns, consistent with
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Economic Stimulus Plan 1.9
    PARLIAMENT OF TASMANIA Budget Paper No 1 The Budget Presented by the Honourable Michael Aird MLC, Treasurer, for the information of Honourable Members, on the occasion of the Budget, 2009-10 Useful 2009-10 Budget and Government Web sites www.budget.tas.gov.au Contains the Budget Papers. www.treasury.tas.gov.au Provides other Budget and financial publications. www.media.tas.gov.au Contains the Government's Budget related media releases. www.tas.gov.au Provides links to the Web sites of a wide range of Tasmanian public and private sector organisations. www.service.tas.gov.au Provides a comprehensive entry point to Government services in Tasmania. www.tasmaniatogether.tas.gov.au Provides detailed information on Tasmania Together, including the current status of this important initiative. CONTENTS 1 The 2009-10 Budget 2 Tasmanian Economy 3 Interim Fiscal Strategy 4 Revenue and Expense Estimates 5 Taxation Revenue 6 Assets and Liabilities 7 Infrastructure Investment 8 Estimated Outcome, 2008-09 9 Commonwealth-State Financial Arrangements Appendix 1 Uniform Government Reporting i INDEX 1 The 2009-10 Budget 1.1 The 2009-10 Budget 1.2 Fiscal Outlook 1.3 Revenue Summary 1.4 Expenditure Summary 1.5 Budget Management Strategies 1.6 Infrastructure Investment 1.8 Nation Building – Economic Stimulus Plan 1.9 Economic Outlook 1.9 2 Tasmanian Economy 2.1 Introduction 2.2 Current Environment – Overview 2.2 Global Conditions 2.2 Australian Conditions 2.3 Economic Outlook 2.4 Summary of 2008-09 Estimates and 2009-10 Forecasts 2.5 Tasmania's Economic Outlook
    [Show full text]
  • Brighton Bypass
    2009 (No. 10) 2009 _______________ PARLIAMENT OF TASMANIA _______________ PARLIAMENTARY STANDING COMMITTEE ON PUBLIC WORKS Brighton Bypass ______________ Presented to His Excellency the Governor pursuant to the provisions of the Public Works Committee Act 1914. ______________ MEMBERS OF THE COMMITTEE Legislative Council House of Assembly Mr Harriss (Chairman) Mr Best Mr Hall Mr Green Mrs Napier By Authority: Government Printer, Tasmania 00000 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ..........................................................................................................................3 BACKGROUND..............................................................................................................................3 SCOPE OF WORKS....................................................................................................................... 7 ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL IMPLICATIONS ....................................................... 14 STAKEHOLDER CONSULTATION...................................................................................... 24 SOCIAL IMPLICATIONS ..........................................................................................................25 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT BENEFITS...........................................................................26 PROJECT COSTS .........................................................................................................................28 EVIDENCE .....................................................................................................................................28
    [Show full text]
  • Uncorrected Proof Issue
    UNCORRECTED PROOF ISSUE Thursday 31 May 2012 - Estimates Committee A (David O'Byrne) - Part 1 LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL ESTIMATES COMMITTEE A Thursday 31 May 2012 MEMBERS Mrs Armitage Ms Forrest Mr Hall Mr Harriss (Chair) Mr Mulder Mr Valentine MrWilkinson IN ATTENDANCE Hon. David O'Byrne MP, Minister for Infrastructure, Minister for Economic Development, Minister for Science, Innovation and Technology, Minister for Police and Emergency Management, Minister for Workplace Relations Ministerial Office Josh Bradshaw, Head of Office Peta Sugden, Adviser for Economic Development Neale Tomlin, Adviser for Infrastructure Astrid Wootton, Adviser for Economic Development Simon Monk, Adviser for Infrastructure Wayne Johnson, Adviser for Workplace Relations Department of Justice Michael Stevens, Deputy Secretary (Corporate) Chris Jacoora, Departmental Liaison Officer Roy Ormerod, General Manager, Workplace Standards Tasmania Martin Shirley, Director Stephen Morrison, Director, Finance Thursday 31 May 2012 - Part 1 1 Estimates A - D.O'Byrne UNCORRECTED PROOF ISSUE Department of Infrastructure, Energy and Resources Norm McIlfatrick, Secretary Amanda Russell, General Manager Corporate Services Simon Hiscock, Manager, Corporate Affairs Marnie Peebles, Executive Assistant Nell Butcher, Executive Assistant David Spence, General Manager, Infrastructure Policy Strategy Craig Hoey, AG Manager Rail Safety Colin Finch, Chief Executive, Marine and Safety Tasmania (MAST) Simon Buxton, Director, Traffic and Infrastructure Phil Cantilon, Director, Operations (Roads
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report May 2011
    Southern Tasmania Regional Land Use Strategy Background Report No.11: Activity Centre Analysis May 2011 Prepared by SGS Economics & Planning This document is detailed supporting information for the Regional Land Use Strategy for Southern Tasmania. While every responsible effort has been made to ensure that this document is correct at the time of printing, the State of Tasmania, the Southern Tasmanian Councils Authority, the 12 Southern Councils and the Sullivans Cove Waterfront Authority, their agents and employees, disclaim any and all liability to any person in respect of anything or the consequences of anything done or omitted to be done in reliance or upon the whole or any part of this document. Please visit www.stca.tas.gov.au or telephone the Southern Tasmanian Councils Authority on 61 3 6270 2242 with any queries. Table of Contents Executive Summary ...................................................................... i Activity Centre Principles .......................................................................................... ii Out-of-Centre Development ..................................................................................... iii 1 Introduction......................................................................... 1 1.1 Background and Purpose of this Report ....................................................................... 1 1.2 Structure of this Report ............................................................................................ 3 2 Policy Review ......................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Additional Budget Estimates 2008-2009 — (February 2009
    Senate Standing Committee on Rural and Regional Affairs and Transport ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS ON NOTICE Additional Budget Estimates February 2009 Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development and Local Government Question No.: NBII 01 Division: Nation Building – Infrastructure Investment Topic: Maintenance Funding for Tasman and Brooker Highways Hansard Page: 25 (24/02/09) Senator Bushby asked: Senator BUSHBY—During the campaign prior to the last election, the then opposition undertook to extend Tasmania’s national network to include the Brooker Highway from Granton to the Port of Hobart and the Tasman Highway from Hobart to the Hobart airport. Has this been achieved yet? Mr Rokvic—The government has formalised the arrangements to extend the Brooker Highway. Senator BUSHBY—Does that mean that you have taken over control and responsibility? Mr Rokvic—That enables the state to utilise maintenance funding in relation to maintenance on the highway. Senator BUSHBY—Those sections of those two highways now have the same status as other national roads? Mr Rokvic—Correct, Senator. Senator BUSHBY—What date did that take effect? Ms McNally—That was in February 2009. Mr Rokvic—Early February 2009. Senator BUSHBY—Just very recently. Mr Rokvic—Correct. Senator BUSHBY—Has the Department revised any of its estimates for costings as a result of the responsibility for taking over those two sections? Mr Rokvic—The maintenance funding that has been provided provides for the Brooker Highway. Senator BUSHBY—Has it increased as a result of taking on those two? Mr Rokvic—The funding is as committed by the government. It was $31 million for maintenance funding plus the additional $1 million provided as part of the nation building.
    [Show full text]
  • Brighton Community News Went to Brighton Elections
    9I@>?KFECommunity News www.brightoncommunitynews.com.au | [email protected] VOLVOL 11 10 NO NO. 6 4SEPTEMBER AUGUST 20092008 80 jobs in bridge upgrade THE $14-million upgrade would begin next month allow boats and shipping of the historic Bridgewater supporting up to 80 jobs vessels to pass under the Bridge is one step closer during construction. bridge once again. with the recent signing of “The Bridgewater bridge “The project, which contracts. project will restore a Tas- includes the works currently McConnell Dowell Con- manian icon to its former under way at the Midland structors (Australia) was glory,” he said. Highway/Lyell Highway Brighton Hardware’s award-winning combination of Paul Diaz and Leanne Taylor-Diaz with Telstra Country Wide awarded the contract to “The lifting mechanism junction, will help cushion manager Noel Hunt. undertake construction. of the bridge has been out of the local impact of the global Federal Minister for action for nearly three years. economic recession.” Infrastructure, Transport “This project will use Tasmanian Minister for Hard work and loyal customers and Regional Development modern technology to Infrastructure Graeme pay off for Brighton Hardware Anthony Albanese said work restore the lifting system and Continued Page 2 BRIGHTON Hardware owners Paul the difference between a nail and a bolt. bought more and more,” Paul said. Diaz and Leanne Taylor are over the While Paul had strong background “It’s just as much a social place for moon with their recent win in the Tel- knowledge of what was needed in terms the customers that come here – a bit like stra Small Business Awards but say the of stock to ensure the shop would flour- going to the barber.” win is all down to their wonderful ish, both also relied on finding out what Paul said he was amazed at how BRIGHTON customers.
    [Show full text]
  • JLUPI Phase One Land Use Strategy Final
    Land Use Strategy Brighton, Central Highlands, Derwent Valley and Southern Midlands CENTRAL HIGHLANDS COUNCIL Prepared by: Trevor Budge, Dion Lester, Marc Bartsch November 2008 consulting engineers | project managers | building surveyors | environmental scientists Table of Contents 1 Introduction ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 1 1.1 A Strategy Based on Sustainability Principles ………………………………………….. 1 1.2 Purpose and Process ………………………………………………………………………………… 2 2 Context …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 3 2.1 State…………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 3 2.2 Southern Tasmania …………………………………………………………………………………. 3 2.3 The Sub-Region ………………………………………………………………………………………. 5 2.4 Greater Hobart ……………………………………………………………………………………….. 5 2.5 Municipalities …………………………………………………………………………………………… 7 2.5.1 Brighton …………………………………………………………………………………….. 7 2.5.2 Central Highlands ………………………………………………………………………. 8 2.5.3 Derwent Valley ………………………………………………………………………….. 9 2.5.4 Southern Midlands …………………………………………………………………….. 10 2.6 Population Projections ……………………………………………………………………………. 11 2.6.1 Results ……………………………………………………………………………………….. 11 3 Why this Sub-Region? …………………………………………………………………………………………….. 12 4 Setting the Scene ……………………………………………………………………………………………………. 14 4.1 Desired Outcomes …………………………………………………………………………………… 14 5 The Development and Implementation of a strong new Sub-Regional Vision 16 …………….. 5.1 The Basis of the Strategy ……………………………………………………………………….. 16 6 Live …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 17 6.1 Policies …………………………………………………………………………………………………….
    [Show full text]
  • 2008-09 Pre-Budget Submission
    2008-09 PRE -BUDGET SUBMISSION JANUARY 2008 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 1 THE AUSTRALIAN TRUCKING ASSOCIATION 1 THE AUSTRALIAN TRUCKING INDUSTRY 1 BACKGROUND 2 ISSUES FOR CONSIDERATION 2 ROAD INFRASTRUCTURE FUNDING 2 FUEL TAX CREDITS 4 TH 4 HEAVY VEHICLE CHARGES DETERMINATION 5 COMMONWEALTH -STATE INCENTIVE PAYMENTS 6 REST AREAS 7 CONCLUSION 8 Minter Ellison Building, 25 National Circuit, Forrest ACT 2603 P 02 6253 6900 F 02 6253 6999 E [email protected] W www.atatruck.net.au 2008-09 Pre-Budget Submission 1. INTRODUCTION Following the swearing in of the new Australian Government on 3 December 2007, the Treasurer issued a media release requesting the Australian public to make submissions regarding priorities for consideration in the 2008-09 Budget. In calling for submissions, the Treasurer identified the following areas as central to Australian Government fiscal policy: • the maintenance of low inflation; • addressing climate change and securing water supplies; • developing national infrastructure; and • raising productivity. Well considered and informed fiscal and regulatory policy for the trucking industry will be crucial for the Government if it is to simultaneously achieve its greenhouse reduction targets at least cost to the community, expand the productive capacity of Australian industry and minimise inflationary cost pressures in the economy. The ATA welcomes the Treasurer’s invitation for submissions on 2008-09 Budget priorities and looks forward to future consultations with the Treasury on policy matters relating to the trucking industry. 2. THE AUSTRALIAN TRUCKING ASSOCIATION The ATA is the peak national body uniting and representing the interests of the Australian trucking industry. First established in 1989 as the Road Transport Forum, the ATA provides public policy advocacy for the trucking industry through industry consultation, research and policy development, communications and education.
    [Show full text]
  • The Legislative Council Select Committee on Road Safety Met in Committee Room 2, Parliament House, Hobart, on Thursday 26 March 2009
    THE LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL SELECT COMMITTEE ON ROAD SAFETY MET IN COMMITTEE ROOM 2, PARLIAMENT HOUSE, HOBART, ON THURSDAY 26 MARCH 2009. Mr RALPH RALLINGS WAS CALLED, MADE THE STATUTORY DECLARATION, AND WAS EXAMINED. CHAIR (Mr Wing) - Thank you for coming. Mr RALLINGS - Road surface conditions are relatively complicated technology. I just want to focus on two aspects of it: night-time visibility and skid resistance. It do not put myself down as an expert on skid resistance, but in an area of general ignorance I guess I am seen as that. I started in pavements in 1976 when I was in charge of the Materials and Research Division of the then Public Works Department. On and off over 20 or 30 years I have had regular but not really intense involvement. I have always kept up with the literature and have read the literature really from about 1976 onwards. Literature was always available at that time through the departmental library. I guess at times when you would go to an accident site and see that skid resistance had been an important factor in a fatality it does sort of sharpen your senses about it. I just want to briefly talk about night-time visibility. What I said in the report is that when you drive around Hobart or anywhere sometimes you can see the lines very clearly, sometimes you cannot see them at all - CHAIR - Particularly if wet. Mr RALLINGS - in wet conditions. It doesn't have to be like that. It is a question of putting resources into it, and also in terms of improving some people's understanding.
    [Show full text]
  • Future Transport Tasmania Bathurst St PO Box 4515 Hobart TAS 7000 July 2015 Submisssion to Legislative Council Enquiry Into Tasrail 2015
    Future Transport Tasmania Bathurst St PO Box 4515 Hobart TAS 7000 July 2015 Submisssion to Legislative Council enquiry into Tasrail 2015 In reference to the above inquiry Future Transport Tasmania (FTT) would like to submit the following to the committee: Future Transport Tasmania is a community group with non-financial members across the state. FTT finds that the terms of reference contain unusual wording which appear either designed deliberately to mask intent, or to have specific negative assumptions. On this basis, FTT submits that it may not be possible for this inquiry to produce an objective set of recommendations. FTT will refer to these issues within this document. FTT is not in a position to fund financial or economic studies and is therefore unable to offer advice or comment on specific financial arrangements of Tasrail. However, FTT believes that a review of the relevant history of the Tasmanian Railways would be prudent, so as to ensure that the committee members are fully conversant with the current situation. This is because past events have had a direct bearing on the present circumstances. A Brief History of Tasmania’s railways Tasmania’s main line from Hobart to Launceston was originally constructed by a private company owned by investors in London. In an ironic twist of repeating history the Tasmanian Main Line Railway Company was purchased by the Tasmanian Government after a string of derailments and complaints. The Tasmanian Government Railways (TGR) ran at a loss for virtually its entire existence. We wish to caution the committee that this financial position however does not necessarily reflect the full benefits provided by rail services that existed over that time.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Consulting Options Tasmania
    Environmental Consulting Options Tasmania REVIEW OF RECORDS AND COLLECTIONS OF LEPIDIUM HYSSOPIFOLIUM (SOFT PEPPERCRESS) IN TASMANIA: BACKGROUND INFORMATION TO INFORM LONG-TERM MANAGEMENT OPTIONS OF SITES UNDER THE JURISDICTION OF THE TASMANIAN DEPARTMENT OF STATE GROWTH Site of Lepidium hyssopifolium on verge of Lyell Highway east of Ouse Grey-green pubescent foliage of Elongating raceme inflorescence of Lepidium hyssopifolium Lepidium hyssopifolium Environmental Consulting Options Tasmania (ECOtas) for Department of State Growth 30 April 2017 Mark Wapstra ABN 83 464 107 291 28 Suncrest Avenue email: [email protected] business ph.:(03) 62 283 220 Lenah Valley, TAS 7008 web: www.ecotas.com.au mobile ph.: 0407 008 685 ECOtas…providing options in environmental consulting Review of Lepidium hyssopifolium in Tasmania INTRODUCTION Rationale for review The Department of State Growth (DofSG) sought a variation to EPBC 2007/3807, which related to the demolition of Maclaines Creek Bridge at Triabunna. The approved action under EPBC 2007/3807 was: The proposed action involves the demolition of the Maclaines Creek Bridge, following the completion of an adjacent new bridge and southern approaches, on the Tasman Highway near Triabunna, Tasmania. The proposal includes the establishment of a 2000 m2 conservation reserve for the endangered Lepidium hyssopifolium. While the conservation reserve was established, some of the specific approval conditions were not met, specifically the maintenance of a self-sustaining population. The target (under condition 3) was at least 300 individuals within four years. This was not met and the required remediation and rehabilitation plans were designed, submitted and implemented as required by the approval conditions, but the population of Lepidium hyssopifolium continued to decline.
    [Show full text]
  • Infrastructure
    . Opp ion ort Tasmanian Budget ct un 2008-09 A it . y s . a e d I Infrastructure Efficient and effective infrastructure is an economic and social necessity. It provides the foundation for economic growth and for the provision of services to the Tasmanian community. It is vital that government investment in infrastructure is made with a clear understanding of the requirements of the Tasmanian community – not just for today but for decades into the future. The Government is committed to a long-term program of infrastructure renewal – a program which will support the needs of Tasmanians, provide a foundation for sustainable economic growth and drive productivity improvement. Budget infrastructure program • Record infrastructure investment program over the next four years. $1.5 b • Ongoing infrastructure program for Government businesses and authorities. $1.8 b Health and human services, including: $492.8 m • undertaking the initial planning, preparation and early stages of the new Royal Hobart Hospital; $232 m • construction of a new emergency department at Launceston General Hospital; $12 m • new ambulances and upgraded ambulance stations; $6.6 m • delivering improved housing services to Tasmanians most in need: – improving public housing and increasing supply; $60 m – ongoing funding for housing initiatives, community housing programs and crisis accommodation; $39 m • upgrading Health Care Centres around the State to improve community health services; $67 m • implementing new information technology systems and projects to improve patient care in Tasmania’s health system. $18.6 m Building community infrastructure $303.9 m • Improving Tasmanian schools. $135.3 m • Redevelopment of the Tasmanian Museum and Art Gallery.
    [Show full text]