Government Services Volume 1

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Government Services Volume 1 PARLIAMENT OF TASMANIA Budget Paper No 2 Government Services Volume 1 Presented by the Honourable Michael Aird MLC, Treasurer, for the information of Honourable Members, on the occasion of the Budget, 2010-11 Useful 2010-11 Budget and Government Websites www.budget.tas.gov.au Contains the Budget Papers. www.treasury.tas.gov.au Provides other Budget and financial publications. www.media.tas.gov.au Contains the Government's Budget related media releases. www.tas.gov.au Provides links to the Websites of a wide range of Tasmanian public and private sector organisations. www.service.tas.gov.au Provides a comprehensive entry point to Government services in Tasmania. www.tasmaniatogether.tas.gov.au Provides detailed information on Tasmania Together, including the current status of this important initiative. CONTENTS VOLUME 1 1 Introduction PART 1: DEPARTMENTS 2 Department of Economic Development, Tourism and the Arts 3 Department of Education 4 Finance-General 5 Department of Health and Human Services 6 Department of Infrastructure, Energy and Resources 7 Department of Justice VOLUME 2 PART 1: DEPARTMENTS (CONTINUED) 8 Ministerial and Parliamentary Support 9 Department of Police and Emergency Management 10 Department of Premier and Cabinet 11 Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment 12 Department of Treasury and Finance PART 2: AGENCIES 13 House of Assembly 14 Integrity Commission 15 Legislative Council 16 Legislature-General 17 Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions i 18 Office of the Governor 19 Office of the Ombudsman 20 Tasmanian Audit Office PART 3: STATUTORY AUTHORITIES 21 Inland Fisheries Service 22 Marine and Safety Tasmania 23 Royal Tasmanian Botanical Gardens 24 State Fire Commission 25 The Tasmanian Academy, Polytechnic and Skills Institute ii INDEX VOLUME 1 PART 1: DEPARTMENTS 1 Introduction 1.1 Overview 1.2 Structure of Budget Paper No 2 Government Services 1.2 Further Information on Budget Paper No 2 1.3 Current Ministerial Portfolio and Departmental Structure 1.4 2 Department of Economic Development, Tourism and the Arts 2.1 Agency Outline 2.1 Major Initiatives 2.2 Output Information 2.4 Output Group 1: Economic Development 2.7 Output Group 2: Sport and Recreation 2.10 Output Group 3: Tourism 2.11 Output Group 4: Arts 2.13 Special Capital Investment Funds 2.15 Detailed Budget Statements 2.18 3 Department of Education 3.1 Agency Outline 3.1 Major Initiatives 3.3 Output Information 3.7 Output Group 1: Pre-Compulsory and Compulsory Education 3.9 Output Group 2: Post-Compulsory Education and Skills Development 3.12 Output Group 3: Community Knowledge Network 3.15 Capital Investment Program 3.17 Detailed Budget Statements 3.20 iii 4 Finance-General 4.1 Agency Outline 4.1 Output Information 4.1 Output Group 1: Debt Servicing and Management 4.3 Output Group 2: Employee Related Costs 4.5 Output Group 3: Government Businesses 4.7 Output Group 4: Miscellaneous 4.8 Special Capital Investment Funds 4.12 Detailed Budget Statements 4.23 5 Department of Health And Human Services 5.1 Agency Outline 5.1 Major Initiatives 5.2 Output Information 5.6 Output Group 1: Acute Health Services 5.8 Output Group 2: Community Health Services 5.12 Output Group 3: Human Services 5.17 Output Group 4: Independent Children's Review Services 5.22 Special Capital Investment Funds 5.23 Capital Investment Program 5.26 Detailed Budget Statements 5.29 6 Department of Infrastructure, Energy and Resources 6.1 Agency Outline 6.1 Major Initiatives 6.2 Output Information 6.6 Output Group 1: Infrastructure 6.10 Output Group 2: Energy Advisory and Regulatory Services 6.14 Output Group 3: Mineral Resources Management and Administration 6.16 Output Group 4: Support for the Minister for Energy and Resources 6.18 Output Group 5: Racing Policy and Regulation 6.19 iv Output Group 6: Transport Subsidies and Concessions 6.22 Special Capital Investment Funds 6.24 Capital Investment Program 6.26 Detailed Budget Statements 6.28 7 Department of Justice 7.1 Agency Outline 7.1 Major Initiatives 7.2 Output Information 7.4 Output Restructure 7.4 Output Group 1: Administration of Justice 7.8 Output Group 2: Legal Services 7.12 Output Group 3: Registration Services 7.13 Output Group 4: Review Services 7.15 Output Group 5: Electoral Services 7.16 Output Group 6: Corrective Services 7.18 Output Group 7: Other Services 7.20 Output Group 8: Consumer Services 7.21 Output Group 9: Industrial Relations Services 7.22 Output Group 10: Resource Planning 7.24 Output Group 11: Workplace Services 7.26 Special Capital Investment Funds 7.28 Capital Investment Program 7.29 Detailed Budget Statements 7.30 v CONVENTIONS Figures in tables and in the text have been rounded. Discrepancies in tables between totals and sums of component items reflect rounding. Percentage changes in all tables are based on the underlying unrounded amounts. The notation used in the Budget Papers is as follows: na not available, or not applicable …. zero, or rounded to zero $'000 $thousand $m $million vii PART 1: DEPARTMENTS 1 INTRODUCTION Features • Budget Paper No 2 Government Services provides information about the Outputs (goods and services) the Government will deliver in 2010-11 and over the Forward Estimate period (2011-12 to 2013-14). • Budget Paper No 2 provides detailed financial and non-financial information for Government departments, agencies and General Government Sector statutory authorities in support of the Consolidated Fund Appropriation Bills, and the Government's initiatives as outlined in the Treasurer's Budget Speech. Introduction 1.1 OVERVIEW Budget Paper No 2 Government Services provides information about the Outputs (goods and services) the Government will deliver in 2010-11 and over the Forward Estimates period (2011-12 to 2013-14). Budget Paper No 2 is a major source of financial and non-financial information on the operations of government departments, agencies and General Government Sector statutory authorities. The other major source of information on these entities is the annual report required to be published by every entity. The following points should be noted when reading Budget Paper No 2: • Information is provided in accordance with Australian Accounting Standards and includes details of the actions being taken by each entity to implement the Government's initiatives. • Information provided reflects the impact of recent changes to the structure of, or Ministerial responsibility for, a number of departments, as detailed in the Administrative Arrangements Order (No. 2) 2010 and the State Service (Restructuring) Order 2009. • Ministerial responsibility for departments is assigned under the provisions of the Administrative Arrangements Order (No. 2) 2010, issued in accordance with section 4(1) of the Administrative Arrangements Act 1990. The Ministerial responsibilities detailed in the Order are illustrated in Table 1.1. STRUCTURE OF BUDGET PAPER NO 2 GOVERNMENT SERVICES Budget Paper No 2 is structured to reflect the differing nature of the entities within the General Government Sector and consists of three parts: • Part 1 includes Government departments, such as the Department of Education and the Department of Health and Human Services; • Part 2 includes Parliamentary agencies, such as the House of Assembly and the Legislative Council, and other independent entities such as the Tasmanian Audit Office and the Office of the Ombudsman; and • Part 3 includes the major Statutory Authorities within the General Government Sector, such as the Inland Fisheries Service, the State Fire Commission, Tasmanian Academy, Tasmanian Polytechnic, and Tasmanian Skills Institute. 1.2 Introduction The structure of Budget Paper No 2 chapters is presented in Chart 1.1. Chart 1.1: Budget Paper No 2 Chapter Structure Agency Introduction Agency Outline Major Initiatives Output Group Budget Infrastructure Allocations Information Capital Investment Program Summary Financial (CIP) Expenditure Information by Output Group Special Capital Investment Performance Information Funds (SCIF) Expenditure Detailed Budget Statements Income Statement Balance Sheet Cash Flow Statement FURTHER INFORMATION ON BUDGET PAPER NO 2 Further information on the structure and content of Budget Paper No 2 is provided in the Guide to the Budget that accompanies the Budget Papers. The Guide is designed to assist readers by explaining the financial information presented in the Budget Papers, and by providing illustrative examples of the main financial statements detailed in the Budget Papers. Introduction 1.3 CURRENT MINISTERIAL PORTFOLIO AND DEPARTMENTAL STRUCTURE The Ministerial portfolio and departmental structure of the Tasmanian Government, which reflects the departmental restructure implemented under the Administrative Arrangements Order (No. 2) 2010 and the State Service (Restructuring) Order 2009, is outlined in Table 1.1. Table 1.1: Structure of the Tasmanian Government Minister Portfolio Department Hon David Bartlett MP Premier Premier and Cabinet Minister for Innovation, Science and Economic Development, Tourism and Technology the Arts Hon Lara Giddings MP Deputy Premier Attorney-General Minister for Justice Justice Minister for Economic Development Economic Development, Tourism and the Arts Minister for Infrastructure Infrastructure, Energy and Resources Hon Michael Aird MLC Treasurer Treasury and Finance Minister for Industry Economic Development, Tourism and the Arts Hon Bryan Green MP Minister for Primary Industries and Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Water Environment Minister for Energy and
Recommended publications
  • Bruny Life, Survey Responses
    A: Community 2018 Bruny Life Community Survey – Respondent Comments My experience with the community has been very positive in that all BI's we have met have been helpful and friendly. I have been accepted and welcomed by many people on Bruny. There are all sorts of avenues for a new comer to slot in if you are willing to make a small effort. 99% of our community are amazing. The small amount of power trippers who try hard to intimidate people they haven’t even met are the reason why some of us don’t want to go to community meetings. There also needs to be a way working, flat out people and families can give input without having to attend meetings. I think social media would be a great way I have good friends but privacy/trust amongst the community is still an issue for me. The rumour mill/gossip can be rampant and damaging so it does stop me from fully participating and "putting what I think" out there. At times I think there is a lack of respect for a difference of opinion. Sometimes groups seem to have difficulty reaching agreement over matters - debate is healthy but sometimes it seems paralysing, disrespectful and damaging on a personal level. There have been some wonderful community leaders emerge. There are many positive social activities on the island that help break down barriers between people/groups/sectors of the community. It seems quite "us" and "them". If you haven't been an island resident for a long time or have a strong history with the island then you seem to be on the outer.
    [Show full text]
  • Wellington Park Social Values and Landscape Assessment Report
    Wellington Park Management Trust WELLINGTON PARK SOCIAL VALUES AND LANDSCAPE – AN ASSESSMENT Prepared by McConnell, A. March 2012 Wellington Park Management Trust, GPO Box 503, Hobart, Tasmania, 7001. Cover – main photo: Mountain Snow [source WPMT] inset photos: :R - Sleeping Beauty [source WPMT] L - Fred Lakin at Lakins Lair [photo: A. McConnell] Explanatory Note This report has been prepared by the Wellington Park Management Trust as part of a multi-stage assessment of the landscape values of Wellington Park. This assessment focuses on the social values of Wellington Park, in particular those which relate to landscape. The assessment is based on a ‘Community Values Survey’, undertaken in late 2010-early 2011 by means of a short questionnaire that the greater Hobart community generally was encouraged to complete. The geographic scope of the study was the whole of Wellington Park. The aim of this study is to understand to what extent, and in which ways, the community, in particular the Greater Hobart community, value Wellington Park. A core part of the assessment was to assess how the Wellington Park landscape is appreciated in order to contribute to an understanding of the full range of landscape values that are being assessed in the broader Wellington Park Landscape Assessment. Wellington Park has acknowledged important landscape values which have applied since the early days of European settlement of Hobart, yet these have not been previously assessed formally or in detail. The main aim of the overall Wellington Park Landscape Assessment therefore is to provide important landscape values information to assist in managing the Park to meet the objectives of the Wellington Park Management Plan.
    [Show full text]
  • Submission by Music Tasmania
    Parliamentary Inquiry into the Australian music industry : Submission by Music Tasmania Parliamentary Inquiry into the Australian music industry: Submission by Music Tasmania Introduction On behalf of Music Tasmania, thank you for the opportunity to provide input into the Parliamentary Inquiry regarding: Factors contributing to the growth and sustainability of the Australian music industry. Music is the soundtrack to the creative economy in Tasmania. Acts like ASTA, Striborg, Psycroptic, Monique Brumby, The Innocents, The Paradise Motel, The Wolfe Brothers, and Luca Brasi, are all part of a legacy of Tasmanian musicians who have a powerful impact on our national and international reputation. Local music festivals such as MONA FOMA, Dark MOFO, Party in the Paddock, and a festival called Panama, are gaining worldwide attention and putting Tasmania on the music map. Apart from their talent, the people working in the Tasmanian music sector are highly committed and resourceful in an environment where funding is scarce, paid opportunities limited, and the music marketplace is increasingly competitive and globalised. Some of the challenges faced by musicians are endemic to the nature of this evolving artform; others however, are more determined by the local music ecosystem in Tasmania. In August 2016, Music Tasmania, in partnership with APRA AMCOS and the Live Music Office, facilitated a statewide consultation to understand the challenges and opportunities facing the Tasmanian sector. The consultation involved face-to-face sessions with key stakeholders,
    [Show full text]
  • Arts and Health Overseas Experience
    Submission to Joint Select Committee Preventative Health Care Inquiry Strengthening the contribution that creativity makes to the health and wellbeing of Tasmanians An opportunity not to be missed! Closeknit” Beaconsfield Scarf Project. Beaconsfield District Health Service. Time to be creative network March 2013 Table of Contents Introduction and Time to Be Creative Network 3 How arts can benefit our health 4 Helping communities in times of crisis Building community Contributing to the healing process Creating a healing environment through the arts Caring for caregivers/health professionals Enriching the medical curriculum Effective Health Education/illness prevention Engaging with disadvantaged groups/sensitive health issues Tasmanian experience 6 Research and evaluation Partnerships with the private sector Partnerships with other levels of government National and overseas developments 8 National framework on Arts and Health Overseas experience Arts and a Preventative Health Care System 9 Recommendations 10 Letters of support 11 References 12 Attachments 1. Program can Creativity Save the Day conference 2. Letter from Jerril Rechter, CEO VicHealth, congratulations on the formation of the network 3. Arts and Health the evidence DHHS 4. Arts and Health a Guide to the Evidence, Arts and Health Foundation 5. Letters of support - - 2 Introduction- Time to be creative Network The TTBCN is please to have the opportunity to make a submission to this important inquiry. In considering the terms of reference the network has chosen to address the questions in this written submission but also requests of the committee the opportunity to “Let the Arts speak for themselves” in the form of a presentation. It is envisaged that the presentation will comprise of visual images of a variety of arts programs that has a positive impact on health and wellbeing and particularly include people who are adversely affected by the social determinants of health.
    [Show full text]
  • TRIP REPORT - BIRDFINDERS South-East Australia Tour 16TH to 29TH Sept 2016
    TRIP REPORT - BIRDFINDERS South-East Australia Tour 16TH to 29TH Sept 2016 Participants : Simon Starr (guide), John Lumby, Vivienne Harvey, James Harvey, Kathryn Dowsett and Robert Dowsett Summary : 247 Bird Species were recorded ( 11 were heard only) All participants had already visited Australia for birding before so some more targeted birding was included to locate new species. Conditions for this tour were interesting to say the least. The climate and birding in Australia is much more variable from year to year than many other countries. South-Eastern Australia in the middle of 2016 was experiencing very wet conditions. Right at the commencement of the tour many rivers that flow north and inland into the Murray-Darling basin were in flood, the first flooding for 5 years. Everywhere we went the ground was saturated and all the rivers and creeks were flowing strongly. The weather was cooler than is average for the time of year, and there was plenty of rain about, although it didn’t have a major impact on our birding time. There was still snow on the mountains as we drove over the Great Dividing Range, and spring migration although underway was slower than usual and perhaps slightly later than usual also. There had been a major exodus of waterbirds from the more coastal regions of Australia in the previous month as they take advantage of the opportunity to breed in the warmer inland areas that were flooding, so some expected birds were not to be found. On the flip side this spring was excellent for many of the resident endemic birds which were fully geared up for breeding and defending their territories, so many excellent views were to be had of the local specialities.
    [Show full text]
  • Council Agenda
    COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA Monday, 26 October 2015 Back (L – R): Cr David Grace, Cr Dean Winter, Cr Nic Street, Cr Richard Atkinson, Cr Mike Percey Front (L – R): Cr Flora Fox, Deputy Mayor Cr Paula Wriedt, Mayor Cr Steve Wass, Cr Bernadette Black, Cr Dr Graham Bury Council Meeting No. 13 Monday, 26 October 2015 NOTICE is hereby given that a meeting of Council will be held in the Kingborough Civic Centre, Kingston on Monday, 26 October 2015 at 5.30pm. Gary Arnold General Manager CONTENTS Agenda Page No. Acknowledgement of Traditional Owners 1 Attendees 1 Apologies 2 Confirmation of Minutes of Council Meeting No. 12 Held on Monday, 28 September 2015 2 Workshops Held Since Council Meeting on 28 September 2015 2 Declarations of Interest 2 Questions on Notice From the Public 4 Questions Without Notice From the Public 4 Questions on Notice From Councillors 4 Questions Without Notice From Councillors 4 Motions of Which Notice Has Been Given 5 Bushfire Preparedness 5 Howden Foreshore Track 6 Kingborough Waste Services 7 State Planning Scheme 9 Mayors For Peace 13 Petitions Still Being Actioned 18 Petitions Received In Last Period 18 Planning Authority 19 DA-2014-247 - Development Application for 10 Units at 3 & 7 Ferry Road, Kettering for P C Boustead 20 Request for Extension of Planning Permit – DAS-2013-31 – Subdivision of Three Lots and Balance at 57-59 Brightwater Road, Blackmans Bay for Peacock Darcey & Anderson Pty Ltd 49 CONTENTS Agenda Page No. Council 53 Reports of Officers 54 Meeting Dates December 2015 & January 2016 54 Bruny Island Advisory
    [Show full text]
  • Review of the Tasmanian Arts Advisory Board and Screen Tasmania Advisory Board – Consultation Paper
    This area is used for a longer descriptive document title. Review of the Tasmanian Arts Advisory Board and Screen Tasmania Advisory Board – Consultation Paper CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 1 2. REVIEW PRINCIPLES ..................................................................................................... 2 3. BACKGROUND ................................................................................................................ 3 4. CURRENT ARRANGEMENTS ........................................................................................ 5 4.1 TAAB and Screen Tasmania Advisory Board (STAB) .............................................. 5 5. RECOMMENDATION ..................................................................................................... 7 6. OVERVIEW– RECOMMENDED OPTION .................................................................... 7 7. SUMMARY....................................................................................................................... 11 Appendix 1 -Tasmanian Arts Governance Review ............................................................. 12 1. INTRODUCTION The arts and cultural sector is increasingly important to the Tasmanian community and economy. Culture, and the cultural sector, is a major contributor to the Tasmanian brand, particularly as Tasmania is increasingly being recognised as an attractive destination for tourists and for its cultural environment and
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Stimulus Plan 1.9
    PARLIAMENT OF TASMANIA Budget Paper No 1 The Budget Presented by the Honourable Michael Aird MLC, Treasurer, for the information of Honourable Members, on the occasion of the Budget, 2009-10 Useful 2009-10 Budget and Government Web sites www.budget.tas.gov.au Contains the Budget Papers. www.treasury.tas.gov.au Provides other Budget and financial publications. www.media.tas.gov.au Contains the Government's Budget related media releases. www.tas.gov.au Provides links to the Web sites of a wide range of Tasmanian public and private sector organisations. www.service.tas.gov.au Provides a comprehensive entry point to Government services in Tasmania. www.tasmaniatogether.tas.gov.au Provides detailed information on Tasmania Together, including the current status of this important initiative. CONTENTS 1 The 2009-10 Budget 2 Tasmanian Economy 3 Interim Fiscal Strategy 4 Revenue and Expense Estimates 5 Taxation Revenue 6 Assets and Liabilities 7 Infrastructure Investment 8 Estimated Outcome, 2008-09 9 Commonwealth-State Financial Arrangements Appendix 1 Uniform Government Reporting i INDEX 1 The 2009-10 Budget 1.1 The 2009-10 Budget 1.2 Fiscal Outlook 1.3 Revenue Summary 1.4 Expenditure Summary 1.5 Budget Management Strategies 1.6 Infrastructure Investment 1.8 Nation Building – Economic Stimulus Plan 1.9 Economic Outlook 1.9 2 Tasmanian Economy 2.1 Introduction 2.2 Current Environment – Overview 2.2 Global Conditions 2.2 Australian Conditions 2.3 Economic Outlook 2.4 Summary of 2008-09 Estimates and 2009-10 Forecasts 2.5 Tasmania's Economic Outlook
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2009–10
    Annual Report 2009–10 David Bartlett, MP PREMIER Dear Premier In accordance with the requirements of Section 36(1) of the State Service Act 2000 and Section 27 of the Financial Management and Audit Act 1990, I enclose for presentation to parliament the 2009-10 Annual Report of the Department of Premier and Cabinet. Yours sincerely Rhys Edwards Secretary 9 October 2010 Department of Premier and Cabinet - Annual Report 2009-10 1 The Department of Premier and Cabinet is a central agency of the Tasmanian State Government. The Ministers to whom the department is responsible are the Premier, and the Minister for Innovation, Science and Technology, Hon David Bartlett MP, the Minister for Local Government and the Minister for Veterans’ Affairs, Hon Bryan Green MP, the Minister for Children, Hon Lin Thorp MLC, and the Minister for Community Development and the Minister for Climate Change, Hon Nick McKim MP. The department also supports the Secretary to Cabinet, Cassy O’Connor MP, who has been authorised to undertake administrative functions related to the Community Development Division’s Disability Bureau, Multicultural Tasmania, Seniors Bureau and Women Tasmania on behalf of the Minister for Community Development. The department provides a broad range of services to the Cabinet, other members of parliament, government agencies and the community. The department works closely with the public sector, the community, local government, the Australian Government and other state and territory governments. The department also provides administrative support to the State Service Commissioner and the Tasmania Together Progress Board, each of which is separately accountable and reports directly to parliament.
    [Show full text]
  • Industrial Relations
    2000 Parliament of Tasmania LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL SELECT COMMITTEE Industrial Relations Members of the Committee Mr Harriss Ms Thorp Mr Squibb Mr Wilkinson (Chair) Secretary: Mrs Sue McLeod 1 Table of Contents….. Executive Summary ...................................................................................... 2 Summary of Recommendations................................................................... 4 Acknowledgements....................................................................................... 7 Chapter 1 – Introduction............................................................................... 8 Chapter 2 – Interpretation........................................................................... 10 Chapter 3 – Intervention ............................................................................. 14 Chapter 4 – Hearings for settling disputes ............................................... 15 Chapter 5 – Criteria applying to disputes relating to termination of employment ............................................................................ 19 Chapter 6 – Orders arising from hearings................................................. 21 Chapter 7 – Commission to be satisfied of public interest ..................... 22 Chapter 8 – Minimum conditions of employment..................................... 23 Chapter 9 – Approval of enterprise agreement......................................... 24 Chapter 10 – Enterprise Commissioner .................................................... 28 Chapter 11 – Right of Entry
    [Show full text]
  • LABOR NEWSNEWS Octoberoctober 2008 2012 PREMIER’S MESSAGE an Abbott Federal Government Would Be a Disaster for Tasmania
    LABORLABOR NEWSNEWS OctoberOctober 2008 2012 PREMIER’S MESSAGE An Abbott Federal Government would be a disaster for Tasmania. It’s difficult to overstate the damage that the federal Opposition leader’s policies would do to the Tasmanian economy and government services if he is ever elected Prime Minister. The single biggest threat is the Liberal Party’s stance on the distribution of GST revenue. Mainland Liberal Premiers are united in pushing for a per capita distribution of GST revenue, which would strip up to $700 million per annum from Tasmania’s budget. That’s the equivalent of $5000 for every Tasmanian household. Mr Abbott has consistently expressed sympathy and support for his Liberal colleague’s campaign. His claims that such an approach would not disadvantage Tasmania are laughable. Liberal Premiers are pursuing a change in the way GST revenue is distributed because they PREMIER LARA GIDDINGS want to get their hands on more of it. With a finite amount of cash available, giving more to WA, Victoria, Queensland and NSW must mean there’s less available for the smaller States. The impact on public services in Tasmania of a further massive reduction in GST revenue would be devastating. But the potential damage to Tasmania of an Abbott government does not end there. Mr Abbott’s pledge to repeal the price on carbon would strip a further $70 million per annum from Tasmania, as we benefit financially from our strong advantage in renewable energy. He has also pledged to abandon the NBN, which would cost Tasmania 800 jobs in the roll-out phase and jeopardise our place in the new digital economy.
    [Show full text]
  • Ministerial Report Report Ministerial SCHOOL VIABILITY
    Ministerial Report Report Ministerial SCHOOL VIABILITY School Viability Reference Group Report to the Minister for Education and Skills 31 January 2012 1 Note from the Chair The Hon Nick McKim MP Minister for Education and Skills Ministerial Parliament House HOBART 7000 Report School Viability Reference Dear Nick Group Report Thank you for the opportunity to chair the School Viability Reference Group tasked with providing a report and recommendations on maintaining a viable Government School system in Tasmania. On behalf 31 January 2012 of our Group, I am pleased to provide you with our final report. Ministerial Report Ministerial At the outset our Group agreed it was vital we begin by meeting with representatives of all Tasmanian Government schools and Local Governments to seek their views. In addition we invited written responses from interested groups and individuals. This proved to be an invaluable process and was the origin for much of our thinking which has led to the recommendations outlined in this report. Without question schools are considered an important part of a community, particularly in rural and remote regions. In many cases we heard strong and credible economic and social arguments supporting the continuation of local schools. Our Group is generally supportive of these views but believes any additional cost to maintain a school for these reasons should not be the responsibility of the Education Department but should be funded from other sources following a comprehensive review of each case. Our recommendations have been based primarily on ensuring the best possible education outcomes for all of Tasmania’s children and young people attending Government schools.
    [Show full text]