DOCSLIB.ORG

A Geophysical Investigation of the Derwent Estuary

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

A Geophysical Investigation of the Derwent Estuary David J Gibbons B. Sc. UNIVERSITY OF TASMANIA A research thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the Degree of Bachelor of Science with Honours School of Earth Sciences, University of Tasmania November, 2001 \. Acknowledgements (, Michael Roach, my supervisor and chief guru for your assistance, expertise and support (even if you did reckon the funny bits in the seismic were basalt!). Thanks especially for scraping together the funds for the project after the grant application got rejected. I hope you enjoyed your holiday, you certainly deserved it. (, James Reid - stand-in guru and all-around good guy - for your help and good humour, particularly in Michael's absence. Thanks also for your lessons in the dark art ­ fortran 77. Alan Jordan and Miles Lawler from the Tasmanian Aquaculture and Fisheries " Institute, without whom this project could not have proceeded. Alan for providing' 'mates rates' for the vessels and Miles for piloting them back and forth, back and forth, back and forth....thank you both. David Mitchell from the University of Sydney, for his willingness to come to Hobart /, in the colder months (straight from the North West SheW) to conduct our seismic survey. His good humour and patience with my clumsiness ("Please don't stand on the eel, Dave!") certainly made the seismic survey a more pleasant experience than it might otherwise have been. .. Pat Quilty for his willingness to help whenever required (particularly in terms of my' literature review). Thanks also to Peter Harris, for looking at my seismic data early in the year and allowing me to use his carbonate distribution map in my thesis. Mineral Resouces Tasmania for their support both personally (through a State Government Mining Scholarship) and for their support of the project. Thanks " particularly to the staff who attended and gave input at the mid-year thinktank, aka 'Roachy's presentation' ("Hi Roachy, we've come for your presentation"). Thanks also to Dr. David Leaman for his attendance and input at 'Roachy's presentation', and for other valuable discussions throughout the year. .. ,.~ The library staff at the SciTech and Morris Miller libraries here at Uni, the Mineral Resources Tasmania library at Rosny, and the CSIRO Marine library at Salamanca. Cheers to my fellow honours students and any staff member or undergrad that said anything nice about me or helped me during the year. Special thanks to those who C' offered to review my chapters in the absence of Michael and James during the latter part of the year - Ben Jones, Luisa D'Andrea, Nolene Dorn, Geoff Peters and my brother Geoff Gibbons. Perhaps I should have taken up the offers! Special thanks also to Jodie Cutler and her friend George for their help with my fieldwork. (', Thanks, Dave. " II " Table of Contents ABSTRACT I (\ ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS II LIST OF FIGURES V LIST OF TABLES VIII (' CHAPTERl INTRODUCTION 1 THE DERWENT RIVER 1 AIMS 4 TECHNIQUES (FOR MARINE SURVEYS) 5 POTENTIAL FIELD METHODS 5 ELECTRICAL AND ElM 5 C SEISMIC 6 SONAR 6 CHAPTER 2 GEOLOGY 8 INTRODUCTION 8 PREVIOUS WORK 8 PREVIOUS GEOPHYSICAL SURVEYS 9 ( GEOLOGY OF lliE HOBART AREA 12 STRATIGRAPHY LOWER PARMEENER SUPER-GROUP 14 UPPER PARMEENER SUPER-GROUP 14 TERTIARY 18 QUATERNARY 20 ( '., IGNEOUS ROCKS JURASSIC DOLERITE 22 TERTIARY BASALT 24 STRUCTURE AND STRUCTURAL mSTORY 26 PErROPHYSICAL PROPERTIES 26 MAGNETIC PROPERTIES 27 ( , ACOUSTIC PROPERITES 28 CHAPTER 3 MAGNETIC SURVEY 30 FIELDWORK 30 SPACE WEATHER 33 DATA PROCESSING 35 HEADING TEST 43 (' CHAPTER 4 MAGNETIC MODELING 50 INTRODUCTION 50 SENSITIVITY TESTING 51 MODELING 57 CHAPTER 5 SEISMIC SURVEY 71 SEISMIC TERMS 72 ( , ACOUSTIC TURBIDITY 77 THE BASALT THEORY 77 DISPROVING THE BASALT lliEORY 79 lliE EVIDENCE FOR SHALLOW GAS 79 ACOUSTIC TURBIDITY 82 ENHANCED REFLECTIONS 82 (\ ACOUSTIC BLANKING 83 PHASE REVERSALS 83 GAS SEEPS 85 VELOCITY PULLDOWN 85 INDIRECTEVIDENCE 85 (\ III (' BIOGENIC METHANE PRODUCTION 92 SEDIMENT SAMPLING 96 OTHER SEISMIC FEATURES 100 CHAPTER 6 ACOUSTIC FINITE DIFFERENCING 106 CONCLUSIONS 113 (\ CHAPTER 7 SEISMIC INTERPRETATION 114 CHAPTER 8 BAT~ETRICSURVEY 157 CHAPTER 9 COMBINED GEOLOGICAL INTERPRETATION 162 CHAPTER 10 CONCLUSIONS AND FURTHER WORK 168 (, CONCLUSIONS 168 RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FURTHER WORK 168 REFERENCES APPENDIX 1 LITERATURE REVIEW 'GLOBAL SEA LEVEL CHANGE OVER THE LAST I' 250,000 YEARS' APPENDIX 2 SOURCE CODE FOR FORTRAN 77 PROGRAM 'HEADING' (WRITTEN BY D. GffiBONS) APPENDIX 3 SOURCE CODE FOR FORTRAN 77 PROGRAM 'GE02UTM' (WRITTEN BY D. GffiBONS) APPENDIX 4 SOURCE CODE FOR QUICKBASIC PROGRAM 'LOCATE.BAS' (, (WRITTEN BY M. ROACH) APPENDIX 5 SEISMIC UNIX SHELL SCRIPT FOR ACOUSTIC FINITE DIFFERENCING (, , ~, (' (" IV r ' List of Figures Figure Number TitlelDescriptiou Page r' 1.1 Overview map ofstudy area (in the context ofTasmania) 2 1.2 Detailed map ofstudy area 3 2.1 Traverse map and contours ofthe vertical component ofmagnetic intensity 10 for the southern portion ofa magnetic survey conducted in the Derwent Estuary in 1974/1975. ReproducedfromLeaman (1975b). 2.2 Geological cross section from the Bowen Bridge alignment. Modifiedfrom 12 ( , Colhoun and Moon (1984) 2.3 Simplified geological map ofthe Hobart area 13 2.4 A photo ofan exposure ofLower Parmeener Super-Group rocks at Opossum 14 Bay (sparsely fossiliferous marine siltstone) 2.5 A map ofthe distribution ofLower Parmeener Super-Group rocks in the 15 Hobart area , 2.6 A photo ofan exposure ofUpper Parmeener Super-Group rocks at Second 16 Bluff, Bellerive (current bedded sandstone) 2.7 A map ofthe distribution ofUpper Parmeener Super-Group rocks in the 17 Hobart area 2.8 A photo ofTertiary boulder beds exposed on the foreshore at Taroona 18 2.9 A map ofthe distibution ofTertiary sediments and sedimentary rocks in the 19 r-', Hobart area 2.10 A photo ofPleistocene marine sediments exposed at Arm End, South Arm 20 2.11 A map ofthe distribution ofQuaternary sediments in the Hobart area 21 2.12 A photo ofa thermal contact between a dolerite sill and Lower Parmeener 22 Super-Group rocks near Blackmans Bay 2.13 A map ofthe distribution ofJurassic Dolerite in the Hobart area 23 2.14 A photo ofa Tertiary basalt lava flow overlying a tuffaceous deposit exposed 24 at Sandy Bay 2.15 A map ofthe distibution ofCenozoic volcanic rocks (i.e. Tertiary basalts) in 25 the Hobart area 3.J.1 Photo ofthe FMVNubeena, a TAFl research vessel. Taken near Electrona in 30 North West Bay 3.1.2 Photo ofthe FMVPoolta, a TAFl research vessel. Taken near Electrona in 31 ('. North West Bay 3.2 A map ofmagnetic survey lines for 2000 and 2001 used for gridding (i.e. not 32 all ofthe survey lines - some were removed prior to gridding. See also figure 3.9) 3.3 Chart ofvariation in horizontal magnetic intensity measured by the Hobart 34 IPS gradiometerfor 4 days in March 2001, demonstrating the magnetic effects ofa magnetic storm ,'-" 3.5 Chart ofthe G856 base station record for day 2 ofthe magnetic survey, 2001 35 (i.e. 21" ofMarch 2001) 3.6 Profile ofmagnetic intensity on line 5400from the 2001 magnetic survey, 36 showing drop outs 3.7 Profile ofmagnetic intensity on line 5400 after drop out editing 37 3.8 Profiles ofmagnetic intensity (after drop out editing) for allprofiles used for 38 (, gridding 3.9 All survey lines for the 2001 and 2000 magnetic surveys 39 3.10 False colour image oftotal magnetic intensity (TMl) grid 40 3.11 False colour image oftotal magnetic intensity gridfrom regional datasetfor 41 comparison to new data 3.12 Contour map ofTM!, generatedfrom gridded survey data 42 (, 3.13 Schematic image ofthe magnetic response ofa sphere ofsusceptible 43 material, used to illustrate the effect ofboat heading on magnetic measurements 3.14 Heading test data (raw) plotted as afunction oftime. Field and base station 45 records shown r, V " 3.15 Diurnally corrected heading test data and northings from GPS log as a 46 fUnction oftime, illustrating low resolution ofnon-differentially corrected GPSposition data 3.16 Observed and calculated heading test data. Calculated data used to apply 47 corrections r 3.17 Comparison ofmagnetic data from 2000 and 2001 surveys - selectedpoints 49 from line intersections 4.1.1 Sensitivity testing example chart 1 51 4.1.2 Sensitivity testing example chart 2 52 4.1.3 Sensitivity testing results chart 1 53 4.1.4 Sensitivity testing results chart 2 53 r 4.1.5 Potent modelfor sensitivity testing number 1 54 4.1.6 Potent modelfor sensitivity testing number 2 55 4.1.7 Potent modelfor sensitivity testing number 3 55 4.1.8 Potent modelfor sensitivity testing number 4 56 4.2 Traverse 1 model results 58 4.3 Traverse 2 model results 59 r 4.4 Traverse 3 model results 60 4.5 Traverse 4 model results 61 4.6 Traverse 5 model results 62 4.7 Traverse 6 model results 63 4.8 Traverse 8 model results 64 4.9 Traverse 9 model results 65 (--- 4.10 Traverse 10 model results 66 4.11 Traverse 11 model results 67 4.12 Traverse 12 model results 68 4.13 Traverse 14 model results 69 4.14 Traverse location map (for Potent models) 70 5.1 Photo ofthe boomer seismic source catamaran (on land) 72 5.2 Photo ofthe seismic receiver array (eel) in the water 73 (-, 5.3 Photo ofthe electrostaticprinter used to output the seismicprofiles 74 5.4 Photo ofthe FMVMallanna (the vessel usedfor the seismic survey) 75 5.5 The two boats usedfor the seismic survey at Bridgewater. Two boats were 75 used because ofthe shallow water depths. 5.6 Map ofthe seismic trackpaths, for 2000 and 2001 76 5.7 Calculated magnetic response ofa thin sheet ofbasalt 78 (-"
Recommended publications
  • Derwent Estuary Program Environmental Management Plan February 2009

    Derwent Estuary Program Environmental Management Plan February 2009

    Engineering procedures for Southern Tasmania Engineering procedures foprocedures for Southern Tasmania Engineering procedures for Southern Tasmania Derwent Estuary Program Environmental Management Plan February 2009 Working together, making a difference The Derwent Estuary Program (DEP) is a regional partnership between local governments, the Tasmanian state government, commercial and industrial enterprises, and community-based groups to restore and promote our estuary. The DEP was established in 1999 and has been nationally recognised for excellence in coordinating initiatives to reduce water pollution, conserve habitats and species, monitor river health and promote greater use and enjoyment of the foreshore. Our major sponsors include: Brighton, Clarence, Derwent Valley, Glenorchy, Hobart and Kingborough councils, the Tasmanian State Government, Hobart Water, Tasmanian Ports Corporation, Norske Skog Boyer and Nyrstar Hobart Smelter. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Derwent: Values, Challenges and Management The Derwent estuary lies at the heart of the Hobart metropolitan area and is an asset of great natural beauty and diversity. It is an integral part of Tasmania’s cultural, economic and natural heritage. The estuary is an important and productive ecosystem and was once a major breeding ground for the southern right whale. Areas of wetlands, underwater grasses, tidal flats and rocky reefs support a wide range of species, including black swans, wading birds, penguins, dolphins, platypus and seadragons, as well as the endangered spotted handfish. Nearly 200,000 people – 40% of Tasmania’s population – live around the estuary’s margins. The Derwent is widely used for recreation, boating, fishing and marine transportation, and is internationally known as the finish-line for the Sydney–Hobart Yacht Race.
  • Lyons Lyons Lyons 8451

    Lyons Lyons Lyons 8451

    BANKS STRAIT C Portland Swan I BASS STRAIT Waterhouse I GREAT MUSSELROE RINGAROOMA BAY BAY Musselroe Bay Rocky Cape C Naturaliste Tomahawk SistersBoat Harbour Beach Beach Table Cape ANDERSON Boat Harbour BAY Gladstone Sisters CreekFlowerdale Stony Head Myalla Wynyard NOLAND Bridport Moorleah Seabrook Lulworth BAY Five Mile Bluff Weymouth Dorset Lapoinya Beechford Bellingham South Somerset Mt Cameron Ansons Bay BURNIE Low Head West Head CPR2484 Calder Low Head Pipers Mt Hicks Brook Oldina Heybridge Greens Pioneer Preolenna Howth Badger Head Beach Lefroy Elliott Mooreville George Town Pipers River Sulphur Creek Devonport Kelso North Winnaleah Herrick Scottsdale FIRES Stowport Penguin Yolla Bell Jetsonville Clarence Point Cuprona ULVERSTONE CPR3658 Bay George Town West Ridgley Leith 2 Beauty Ridgley Upper West Pine Hawley Beach Golconda Blumont Derby DEVONPORT Shearwater Point OF Henrietta Stowport Natone Scottsdale Turners Northdown CPR2472 Takone Camena Port Sorell Nabowla Beach Lebrina Tulendeena Branxholm The Gardens Gawler Don Kayena West Scottsdale Wesley Vale Tonganah Highclere Forth Beaconsfield Weldborough North Tugrah Quoiba Tunnel Riana Thirlstane Sidmouth Springfield Sloop Motton Cuckoo BAY Abbotsham Moriarty Lower Legerwood Lagoon Tewkesbury South Spreyton Latrobe Turners Burnie Riana Eugenana Tarleton Harford West Deviot Marsh Upper Spalford Kindred Melrose Mt Direction Karoola South Ringarooma Binalong Bay Natone Lilydale Springfield Goulds Country CPR2049 Paloona Turners Hampshire CenGunnstral Coast Marsh Plains Sprent Latrobe
  • Derwent Catchment Review

    Derwent Catchment Review

    Derwent Catchment Review PART 1 Introduction and Background Prepared for Derwent Catchment Review Steering Committee June, 2011 By Ruth Eriksen, Lois Koehnken, Alistair Brooks and Daniel Ray Table of Contents 1 Introduction ..........................................................................................................................................1 1.1 Project Scope and Need....................................................................................................1 2 Physical setting......................................................................................................................................1 2.1 Catchment description......................................................................................................2 2.2 Geology and Geomorphology ...........................................................................................5 2.3 Rainfall and climate...........................................................................................................9 2.3.1 Current climate ............................................................................................................9 2.3.2 Future climate............................................................................................................10 2.4 Vegetation patterns ........................................................................................................12 2.5 River hydrology ...............................................................................................................12 2.5.1
  • Wellington Park Social Values and Landscape Assessment Report

    Wellington Park Social Values and Landscape Assessment Report

    Wellington Park Management Trust WELLINGTON PARK SOCIAL VALUES AND LANDSCAPE – AN ASSESSMENT Prepared by McConnell, A. March 2012 Wellington Park Management Trust, GPO Box 503, Hobart, Tasmania, 7001. Cover – main photo: Mountain Snow [source WPMT] inset photos: :R - Sleeping Beauty [source WPMT] L - Fred Lakin at Lakins Lair [photo: A. McConnell] Explanatory Note This report has been prepared by the Wellington Park Management Trust as part of a multi-stage assessment of the landscape values of Wellington Park. This assessment focuses on the social values of Wellington Park, in particular those which relate to landscape. The assessment is based on a ‘Community Values Survey’, undertaken in late 2010-early 2011 by means of a short questionnaire that the greater Hobart community generally was encouraged to complete. The geographic scope of the study was the whole of Wellington Park. The aim of this study is to understand to what extent, and in which ways, the community, in particular the Greater Hobart community, value Wellington Park. A core part of the assessment was to assess how the Wellington Park landscape is appreciated in order to contribute to an understanding of the full range of landscape values that are being assessed in the broader Wellington Park Landscape Assessment. Wellington Park has acknowledged important landscape values which have applied since the early days of European settlement of Hobart, yet these have not been previously assessed formally or in detail. The main aim of the overall Wellington Park Landscape Assessment therefore is to provide important landscape values information to assist in managing the Park to meet the objectives of the Wellington Park Management Plan.
  • Annual-Report-2016-17.Pdf

    Annual-Report-2016-17.Pdf

    MISSION VISION VALUES To lead and support improved The Southern region’s natural Innovation management of natural resources resources will be protected, Excellence in Southern Tasmania. sustainably managed and improved for the shared environmental, social Collaboration and economic benefit of our region Passion by a well-informed, well-resourced Outcome Focused and actively committed community. Front cover photo: JJ Harrison IV NRM SOUTH ANNUALNRM SOUTH REPORT ANNUAL 2016–17 REPORT 2016–17 IV CONTENTS ABOUT US 2 OUR REGION 3 FOREWORD FROM THE CHAIR 4 CEO REPORT 5 HIGHLIGHTS 2016–17 6 PERFORMANCE OVERVIEW 7 THE 2015–20 REGIONAL STRATEGY FOR SOUTHERN TASMANIA – FROM DEVELOPMENT TO IMPLEMENTATION 8 HIGH VALUE SPECIES, PLACES AND COMMUNITIES 10 BIOSECURITY PRACTICES 15 WATERWAYS AND COASTAL AREAS 18 SUSTAINABLE MANAGEMENT PRACTICES 22 BUILDING KNOWLEDGE AND DATA 26 WORKING ON COUNTRY WITH THE ABORIGINAL COMMUNITY 28 BUILDING COMMUNITY CAPACITY AND ENGAGEMENT 33 BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT 42 GOVERNANCE 44 APPENDIX 1 47 APPENDIX 2 49 APPENDIX 3 51 APPENDIX 4 54 APPENDIX 5 55 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 57 NRM SOUTH ANNUAL REPORT 2016–17 1 ABOUT US Our region’s natural resources underpin both its economic prosperity and social wellbeing, and NRM South’s role is to help manage our resources wisely and sustainably and keep our natural and productive landscapes healthy over the long term. NRM South is one of three natural resource management bodies in Tasmania, and forms part of a national network of 56 similar bodies. We act as a ‘hub’, working on issues of statewide significance with partners that include government, research, industry, other non-government organisations, regional bodies, and the community.
  • Hobart Floating Bridge

    Hobart Floating Bridge

    HOBART’S FLOATING BRIDGE Nomination for a Heritage Recognition Award Anonymous Bridge in service; lift span far left Prepared by Bruce Cole for Engineering Heritage Tasmania Version 2 April 2014 CONTENTS CONTENTS ...................................................................................................................... 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................... 3 LOCATION MAP ............................................................................................................... 3 HERITAGE AWARD NOMINATION FORM ....................................................................... 4 OWNER’S LETTER OF APPROVAL ................................................................................. 5 EARLIER PROPOSALS .................................................................................................... 6 PROJECT PLANNING ..................................................................................................... 7 CONSTRUCTION ............................................................................................................. 7 Bridge components ...................................................................................................... 7 Western approach spans ............................................................................................. 7 Contract awarded......................................................................................................... 7 Lift span ......................................................................................................................
  • 3966 Tour Op 4Col

    3966 Tour Op 4Col

    The Tasmanian Advantage natural and cultural features of Tasmania a resource manual aimed at developing knowledge and interpretive skills specific to Tasmania Contents 1 INTRODUCTION The aim of the manual Notesheets & how to use them Interpretation tips & useful references Minimal impact tourism 2 TASMANIA IN BRIEF Location Size Climate Population National parks Tasmania’s Wilderness World Heritage Area (WHA) Marine reserves Regional Forest Agreement (RFA) 4 INTERPRETATION AND TIPS Background What is interpretation? What is the aim of your operation? Principles of interpretation Planning to interpret Conducting your tour Research your content Manage the potential risks Evaluate your tour Commercial operators information 5 NATURAL ADVANTAGE Antarctic connection Geodiversity Marine environment Plant communities Threatened fauna species Mammals Birds Reptiles Freshwater fishes Invertebrates Fire Threats 6 HERITAGE Tasmanian Aboriginal heritage European history Convicts Whaling Pining Mining Coastal fishing Inland fishing History of the parks service History of forestry History of hydro electric power Gordon below Franklin dam controversy 6 WHAT AND WHERE: EAST & NORTHEAST National parks Reserved areas Great short walks Tasmanian trail Snippets of history What’s in a name? 7 WHAT AND WHERE: SOUTH & CENTRAL PLATEAU 8 WHAT AND WHERE: WEST & NORTHWEST 9 REFERENCES Useful references List of notesheets 10 NOTESHEETS: FAUNA Wildlife, Living with wildlife, Caring for nature, Threatened species, Threats 11 NOTESHEETS: PARKS & PLACES Parks & places,
  • House of Assembly Tuesday 17 March 2020

    House of Assembly Tuesday 17 March 2020

    Tuesday 17 March 2020 The Speaker, Ms Hickey, took the Chair at 10 a.m., acknowledged the Traditional People and read Prayers. STATEMENT BY PREMIER COVID-19 [10.02 a.m.] Mr GUTWEIN (Bass - Premier - Statement) - Madam Speaker, we are in difficult and challenging times but I know that all of us, along with all Tasmanians, will work together to ensure the health and wellbeing of Tasmanians and importantly we will work hard to ensure that they remain in jobs. It is important that important public institutions like parliament, and also private institutions that provide services to Tasmanians, all do our bit to ensure that we can continue, taking into account effective appropriate social distancing measures. I want to thank all of the members, importantly the Leader of the Opposition, Rebecca White, and the Leader of the Greens, Cassy O'Connor, along with yourself and all of your staff for being prepared to work together to ensure that this parliament can continue with its important work. I also acknowledge the Clerks in both Houses for the work they have undertaken with the staff who work here in Parliament House to ensure that, likewise, there is appropriate social distancing and this place can continue. Madam Speaker, thank you. Statement noted. MOTION Sessional Orders - Interim Arrangements [10.04 a.m.] Mr FERGUSON (Bass - Leader of Government Business) (by leave) - Madam Speaker, before question time commences I wish to move a minor change to the Standing Orders in relation to Sessional Orders being established for an interim period. Madam Speaker, I move - That for the remainder of this session: 1.
  • Proclamation Under the Roads and Jetties Act 1935

    Proclamation Under the Roads and Jetties Act 1935

    TASMANIA __________ PROCLAMATION UNDER THE ROADS AND JETTIES ACT 1935 STATUTORY RULES 2018, No. 91 __________ I, the Governor in and over the State of Tasmania and its Dependencies in the Commonwealth of Australia, acting with the advice of the Executive Council, by this my proclamation made under section 7 of the Roads and Jetties Act 1935 – (a) declare the portions of roads specified in Schedule 1 to this proclamation to be State highways for the purposes of Part II of that Act; and (b) declare the portions of roads specified in Schedule 2 to this proclamation to be a single subsidiary road, classified as a main road, for the purposes of Part II of that Act; and (c) amend the proclamation notified in the Gazette as Statutory Rules 1970, No.67 as follows: (i) by omitting from the First Schedule to that proclamation the item relating to the Brooker Highway and substituting the following item: Roads and Jetties Act 1935 – Proclamation Statutory Rules 2018, No. 91 Brooker Highway From the intersection with the 11.48 Tasman Highway to the Midland Highway at, and (18.48 including, the intersection with kilometres) the Lyell Highway, Granton (ii) by omitting from the First Schedule to that proclamation the item relating to the Southern Outlet Highway and substituting the following item: Southern Outlet From the intersection with the 5.95 Highway southern boundary of the Davey/Macquarie Couplet, (9.582 South Hobart to and including kilometres) the Kingston Interchange (iii) by omitting from the First Schedule to that proclamation the item relating to the Tasman Highway and substituting the following item: 2 Roads and Jetties Act 1935 – Proclamation Statutory Rules 2018, No.
  • River Derwent Flood Data Book

    River Derwent Flood Data Book

    RIVER DERWENT FLOOD DATA BOOK Land and Water Management Branch Resource Management and Conservation Division May 2000 River Derwent Flood Data Book This Book Forms a Part of the Requirements for Emergency Management Australia Reporting Liza Fallon David Fuller Bryce Graham Land and Water Management Branch Resource Management and Conservation Division. Report Series WRA 00/01 May 2000. Emergency Management Australia River Derwent Flood Data Book TABLE OF CONTENTS GLOSSARY 2 ACRONYMS 3 1. INTRODUCTION 4 Flood Data Books 4 Data Sources 4 2. THE ENVIRONMENT 5 Catchment and Drainage System 5 Climate and Rainfall 5 3. FLOODING IN THE DERWENT CATCHMENT 6 Historic Floods 6 Flooding on the 23rd April 1960 9 4. FLOOD ANALYSIS 10 5. RECORDS OF FLOODING 14 6. NEW RECORDS OF FLOODING 28 REFERENCES 29 PLATES Cover Plate: April 1960 – Oblique aerial photograph looking downstream across New Norfolk – approximately 80% of the flood peak at 16:10 hours. Plate 1: 1940 – Flooding near the Boyer Mill looking from the Molesworth Road. Plate 2: June 1952 – Flooding at No 5 and No 10 Ferry Street, New Norfolk. Plate 3: August 1954 – Flooding outside the York Hotel at Granton. Plate 4: May 1958 – Flooding between the Styx River and the River Derwent at Bushy Park. Plate 5: November 1974 – Flooding at the Derwent Church of England at Bushy Park. Plate 6: April 1960 – Flooding at New Norfolk. Plate 7: April 1960 – Flooding on the New Norfolk Esplanade. - 1 - Emergency Management Australia River Derwent Flood Data Book GLOSSARY Annual Exceedance Probability (AEP) A measure of the likelihood (expressed as a probability) of a flood reaching or exceeding a particular magnitude.
  • Observations on the Hydrology of the River Derwent, Tasmania

    Observations on the Hydrology of the River Derwent, Tasmania

    PAPERS AND PROCEFJ)INGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF TASMANIA, VOLUME 39 Observations on the Hydrology of the River Derwent, Tasmania By ERIC R. GurLER Depaytlnent of Zoology, UniV6Ysity of Tasmania (WITH 6 TEXT FIGURES) ABSTRACT This paper records a series of hydrological observationiS made on the River Derwent over a twenty month period. The salinity, pH and temperature of the river are shown. The salinity of the water at the bottom of the river at Millbrook Rise (Station 47) is 0 gms/oo• The surface salinity is zero at Boyer (Station 45). At Cadbury's (Station 5) the salinity of the bottom water is 30 gms/". The salinity gradient has been also worked out. INTRODUCTION This work was commenced as part of a survey which was intended to include the relationship between salinity and the distribution of marine forms in the estuary of the River Derwent and to obtain an estimate of the toleration of some species for fresh water. Only the hydrological results are recorded here. 'rhe only work of major significance dealing with the hydrology of Australian estuarine waters is that of Rochford (1951). In this paper, he also reviews the more important overseas literature. Rochford gives some figures relating to the Derwent Estuary as well as to the Huon River and D'Entrecasteaux Channel in the South. '1'he River Derwent was chosen for survey because it i's convenient to Hobart and is suitable for boat work over most of the area of salt water penetration. It has the advantage of being reasonably free from factory pollution with the possible exception of two small areas which will be described below.
  • Tasman Bridge Disaster: 25Th Anniversary Memorial Service

    Tasman Bridge Disaster: 25Th Anniversary Memorial Service

    Tasman Bridge disaster: 25th anniversary memorial service Introduction growth in both after the opening of the The collision of the vessel ss Lake Illa- by Rod McGee, Manager Asset Strategies, bridge warra with Tasman Bridge on 5 January The bridge however suffered storm and Department of Infrastructure, Energy and 1975 had a major impact on the lives of corrosion damage and increasing traffic the people of southern Tasmania The Resources, Tasmania and Lynn Young, congestion, especially during the opera- event had a number of unique charac- State Recovery Coordinator, Department tion of the lift span As a result, consultants teristics and occurred at a time when the of Health and Human Services, Tasmania were commissioned in 1956 to investigate effects of disasters on communities were options for a bridge to replace the floating less well understood Assistance to the arch A number of bridge and tunnel community in this regard was thus stream Population growth on the eastern options were considered during the limited shore had been slow to that time, but preliminary design stage and review by An approach to the Tasmanian State accelerated after the opening of the the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Government by a local Lions Club led to a bridge generating increasing traffic Public Works Navigation issues, including memorial service to mark the 25th anni- demand Figure 1 shows population on the possibility of ship collision, were versary of the disaster This paper the eastern shore and cross river vehi- assessed comprehensively While