2013 Ravenswood / 4 Corners Specific Plan

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

2013 Ravenswood / 4 Corners Specific Plan Table of Contents 1: INTRODUCTION 1 Regional and Local Setting 3 Specific Plan Area 5 Purpose and Intent of the Plan 6 Key Community-Generated Design Goals 6 Previous Planning Efforts 7 Statutory Requirements of the Specific Plan 8 Plan Contents 8 2: COMMUNITY PROCESS AND OUTREACH 11 Outreach Strategy 12 Community Meetings 13 TOD Bus Tour 14 CAC Meetings 15 Planning Commission and City Council Meetings 16 3: EXISTING CONDITIONS 17 Historic Context 18 Demographics 18 Land Use 19 Urban Design Character 23 Traffic and Circulation 27 Infrastructure 31 Hazardous Materials 33 Parks and Open Space 34 Community Services 36 Community Organizations 37 Economic Conditions and Jobs-Housing Ratios 38 RAVENSWOOD / 4 CORNERS TOD SPECIFIC PLAN CITY OF EAST PALO ALTO Table of Contents 4: VISION AND CONCEPT 41 Vision Statement 42 Plan Concept 42 Open Space and Public Amenity Concepts 48 Building Form 54 Development Potential 59 Circulation Network 59 5: GOALS AND POLICIES 63 Land Use and Community Character 64 Transportation and Traffic 75 Utilities and Public Services 79 Cultural Resources 84 6: LAND USE 87 Land Use Districts 88 Land Use Regulations 90 Development Standards 97 Performance Standards 103 7: STREETSCAPE STANDARDS 105 Street Types 106 Street Right-of-Way Standards and Guidelines 116 RAVENSWOOD / 4 CORNERS TOD SPECIFIC PLAN CITY OF EAST PALO ALTO Table of Contents 8: CIRCULATION 121 Pedestrian and Bicycle Circulation 122 Vehicular Circulation 123 Parking 126 Transit 128 9: PUBLIC UTILITIES AND SERVICES 133 Water Supply 134 Utility Infrastructure 136 Public Safety 142 Cultural, Institutional, and Civic Uses 143 Schools 143 Parks, Open Space, and Trails 144 10: IMPLEMENTATION 147 Technical Implementation Items 148 Fiscal Impact Analysis 148 Conceptual Financing Plan 152 Development Phasing 159 RAVENSWOOD / 4 CORNERS TOD SPECIFIC PLAN CITY OF EAST PALO ALTO Table of Contents APPENDIX A: DESIGN STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES APPENDIX B: ADDITIONAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS APPENDIX C: FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS EXHIBITS AND TABLES APPENDIX D: CONCEPTUAL FINANCING PLAN TABLES AND ATTACHMENTS RAVENSWOOD / 4 CORNERS TOD SPECIFIC PLAN CITY OF EAST PALO ALTO INTRODUCTION 1 From the time the City of East Palo Alto was incorporated in 1983, its residents and leaders have worked diligently to main- tain and enhance the community. In some parts of the city, these efforts have borne fruit. But change has been slow to come to the Ravenswood Business District and 4 Corners. In recent years, the City Council has focused its attention on the Ravenswood Redevelopment Project Area, which is the last of its Redevelopment Areas that has seen little change since the adoption of the Redevelopment Plan. As a result, the tide has begun to turn. New apartments have been built near 4 Corners, with rents that are affordable to the city’s residents. In addi- tion, the City has worked to improve the appearance and func- tion of Bay Road, making it a more pleasant place for people to walk and ride bicycles. But a great deal of work remains. There are still many vacant properties in Ravenswood/4 Corners that could be developed, as well as opportunities to use developed properties in a way that better meets the community’s needs. The area’s public utilities, including water, stormwater, and wastewater pipes, must also be improved so that significant new development can occur. To shape the future of Ravenswood and 4 Corners, the City of East Palo Alto has prepared this plan, the Ravenswood/4 Corners Transit Oriented Development Specific Plan. The Specific Plan outlines how Ravenswood and 4 Corners can be transformed into thriving districts that provide places to live; employment opportunities; parks and open spaces; and ameni- ties for all of East Palo Alto, such as expanded library service and a new community center. It creates a framework for trans- forming the intersection of University Avenue and Bay Road into a new “downtown” for East Palo Alto. In addition, it pro- vides detailed regulations for all new development that occurs in Ravenswood and 4 Corners. 1 INTRODUCTION The Specific Plan reflects extensive community input. From October 2009 through March 2011, the City led a community process that included 15 public meetings, of which three were highly interactive public workshops. Commu- nity members offered a wide variety of ideas for the future of Ravenswood and 4 Corners, and as many of these ideas as possible have been incorporated into this Specific Plan. The Specific Plan’s title refers to the concept of “transit oriented development” (TOD). Successful TOD results in homes, stores, and workplaces that are locat- ed near transit stops and designed to increase ridership potential and proximity to services. As a result, TOD can make it easier for people to use public transit for their daily trips. The Plan takes advantage of opportunities to connect new development in East Palo Alto with improved public transit that may be pro- vided in the future. The following sections provide an overview of the Specific Plan and describe the chapters that follow this introduction. 2 RAVENSWOOD / 4 CORNERS TOD SPECIFIC PLAN CITY OF EAST PALO ALTO INTRODUCTION 1 Regional and Local Setting East Palo Alto is located in the southeast portion of the San Francisco Peninsula, approximately 30 miles southeast of San Francisco and 18 miles northwest of San Jose. US 101 crosses through southeast East Palo Alto. The city is bordered at the south by Palo Alto and at the west and north by Menlo Park. The San Francisco Bay forms the city’s eastern boundary. Figure 1-1 shows the regional location of East Palo Alto. §¦¨80 §¦¨5 99 Figure 1-1: East Palo Alto Regional Location FAIRFIELD STOCKTON 4 OAKLAND SAN FRANCISCO TRACY §¦¨580 HAYWARD §¦¨680 §¦¨880 §¦¨280 101 ! EAST PALO ALTO PACIFIC OCEAN §¦¨280 SAN JOSE §¦¨5 17 §¨152 1 ¦ 0 10 20 miles RAVENSWOOD / 4 CORNERS TOD SPECIFIC PLAN 3 CITY OF EAST PALO ALTO 1 INTRODUCTION The Plan Area that is addressed in the Specific Plan is located in the northeast portion of the city, west of the San Francisco Bay. A portion of the Plan Area shares a boundary with the city limits. Figure 1-2 shows how the Plan Area fits DUMBARTON RAIL within the city. 84 Figure 1-2: Project Plan Area RAVENSWOOD OPEN SPACE PRESERVE DUMBARTON RAIL 84 SAN FRANCISCO BAY WILLOW ROAD COOLEY LANDING RAVENSWOOD OPEN SPACE PRESERVE BAY ROAD PALO ALTO BAYLANDS NATURE PRESERVE SAN FRANCISCO BAY WILLOW ROAD COOLEY LANDING BAY ROAD PALO ALTO BAYLANDS NATURE PRESERVE £¤101 UNIVERSITYAVENUE IKEA CITY OF MENLO PARK £¤101 UNIVERSITYAVENUE IKEA CITY OF MENLO PARK CITY OF PALO ALTO SPECIFIC PLAN AREA CITY LIMITS CITY OF PALO ALTO 0 1,000 2,000 feet SPECIFIC PLAN AREA CITY LIMITS 0 1,000 2,000 feet 4 RAVENSWOOD / 4 CORNERS TOD SPECIFIC PLAN CITY OF EAST PALO ALTO INTRODUCTION 1 Specific Plan Area The Plan Area encompasses approximately 350 acres and is generally bounded at the west by University Avenue; at the north by a rail line, where future Dumbarton Rail passenger service is planned; at the east by the baylands along the San Francisco Bay; and at the south by Weeks Street. The Specific Plan Area also extends south from Weeks Street to Runnymede Street in the southeast along Pulgas Avenue. In addition to University Avenue, which is an important corridor within the city as well as the region, the Plan Area includes Bay Road, a major east-west corridor in East Palo Alto. Figure 1-3 shows the Plan Area boundary. DUMBARTON RAIL LINE Figure 1-3: Plan Area Boundary BAY TRAIL DUMBARTON RAIL LINE BAY TRAIL DREW COURT TULANE AVENUE RAVENSWOOD OPEN TEMPLE COURT SAN FRANCISCO BAY SPACE PRESERVE STEVENS AVENUE UNIVERSITY AVENUE UNIVERSITY XAVIER STREET DREW COURT TULANE AVENUE PURDUE AVENUEHUNTER STREET GEORGETOWN STREET RAVENSWOOD OPEN TEMPLE COURT SAN FRANCISCO BAY SPACE PRESERVE STEVENS AVENUE FORDHAM STREET PURDUE AVENUEGONZAGA STREET UNIVERSITY AVENUE UNIVERSITY ILLINOIS STREET XAVIER STREET PURDUE AVENUEHUNTER STREET GEORGETOWN STREET COOLEY LANDING FORDHAM STREET PURDUE AVENUEGONZAGA STREET NOTRE DAME AVENUE ILLINOIS STREET COOLEY LANDING JACK FARRELL PARK NOTRE DAME AVENUE BAYLOR STREET BAYLOR ANNAPOLIS STREET ANNAPOLIS MICHIGAN AVENUE TARA STREET TARA BAY ROAD PULGAS AVENUE PULGAS JACK BAY TRAIL FARRELL PARK DEMETER STREET DEMETER BAYLOR STREET BAYLOR ANNAPOLIS STREET ANNAPOLIS ILLINOIS STREET ILLINOIS GONZAGA STREET GONZAGA FORDHAM STREET FORDHAM BAY ROAD MICHIGAN AVENUE AVENUE PULGAS TARA STREET TARA BAY ROAD PULGAS AVENUE PULGAS PALO ALTO BAYLANDSBAY TRAIL NATURE PRESERVE DEMETER STREET DEMETER CLARKE AVENUE CLARKE PAUL ROB\ PAUL CAROLE CT CAROLE ILLINOIS STREET ILLINOIS WEEKS STREET GONZAGA STREET GONZAGA FORDHAM STREET FORDHAM BAY ROAD AVENUE PULGAS PALO ALTO BAYLANDS NATURE PRESERVE UNIVERSITY AVENUE RUNNYMEDE STREET CLARKE AVENUE CLARKE PAUL ROB\ PAUL CAROLE CT CAROLE WEEKS STREET UNIVERSITY AVENUE SPECIFIC PLAN AREA RUNNYMEDE STREET 0 300 600 feet 5 SPECIFIC PLAN AREA 0 300 600 feet 1 INTRODUCTION Some small parts of the Plan Area are located outside of the general boundaries described above. At the southeast boundary, a small area south of Weeks Street is included because it is part of the City’s Redevelopment Area. Similarly, the southwest boundary extends to include blocks west of University Avenue in the 4 Corners Area, and to include all parcels within the Ravenswood Redevelop- ment Area. The Plan Area is bounded at the east by the Ravenswood Open Space Preserve and the Palo Alto Baylands Nature Preserve. Cooley Landing, which is part of the Plan Area, extends into the San Francisco Bay. The Plan Area also encompasses University Village, a single-family neighbor- hood immediately east of University Avenue. While the Specific Plan does not call for new development or land use changes in University Village, it includes focused improvements that will help make University Village a better place to live.
Recommended publications
  • City of Menlo Park TDM Existing Conditions
    City of Menlo Park TMA Options Analysis Study: Existing Conditions ___ Client: City of Menlo Park January 2020 Our ref: 23642101 Content 3 Introduction 4 Existing Travel Options 4 Rail and Transit 5 Public and Private Shuttles 6 Existing TDM Programming 8 Travel Patterns 9 Northern Menlo Park 10 Central Menlo Park 11 Downtown Menlo Park 12 Southern Menlo Park 13 Stakeholder Outreach 13 Interviews 16 Small Business Drop Ins 18 Employee Survey 22 Conclusions 23 Next Steps 2 | January 2020 City of Menlo Park: TDM Existing Conditions Introduction TMA Options Analysis for Menlo Park Menlo Park Focus Area Zones The four zones include: The City of Menlo Park has commissioned an Options This Existing Conditions Report (and subsequent 1. Northern Menlo Park (including Bohannon Dr. Analysis for establishing a Transportation reports and analyses) focuses on four areas or area) Management Association (TMA). “zones” within the City of Menlo Park. Each zone 2. Central Menlo Park faces unique challenges due to both its location and As has been seen across Silicon Valley and generally the specific land uses and industry housed within it. 3. Downtown Menlo Park the Bay Area, recent years have brought an increase 4. Southern Menlo Park (including SLAC area) in congestion in the City of Menlo Park. Transportation Demand Management (TDM) has Figure 1: Map of Menlo Park Zone Analysis been utilized for years to curb congestion by encouraging non single-occupancy vehicle travel across worksites, cities and counties in the Bay Area and beyond. As TDM is implemented in Menlo Park at a variety of levels, the City hopes that a TMA may help to better coordinate the efforts between public and private entities in the city, and potentially region-wide.
    [Show full text]
  • Transportation and Traffic
    4.13 TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC This chapter describes the existing traffic conditions of the EA Study Area and evaluates the potential envi- ronmental consequences of future development that could occur by adopting and implementing the pro- posed Housing Element Update, General Plan Consistency Update, and associated Zoning Ordinances amendments, together referred to as the “Plan Components” on transportation and traffic. A summary of the relevant regulatory setting and existing conditions is followed by a discussion of Plan Components and cumulative impacts. The chapter is based on the traffic analysis prepared by TJKM Transportation Consultants dated March 8, 2013, herein referred to as “Traffic Study.” The future baseline traffic volumes have been developed from output of the City/County Association of Governments of San Mateo County (C/CAG) travel demand model run by the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority (VTA). The travel demand associated with the Plan Components have been obtained from the C/CAG Model based upon the anticipated future land uses that have been developed resulting from the land use controls under Near-Term 2014 and 2035 condi- tions. The complete Traffic Study and technical appendices are included in Appendix F of this EA. A. Regulatory Framework 1. Federal Laws and Regulations a. Federal Highway Administration The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) is the agency of the United States (U.S.) Department of Transportation (DOT) responsible for the federally-funded roadway system, including the interstate high- way network and portions of the primary State highway network, such as Interstate 280 (I-280). b. Americans with Disabilities Act The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990 provides comprehensive rights and protections to indi- viduals with disabilities.
    [Show full text]
  • Community Risk Assessment: Standards of Cover Menlo Park Fire Protection District, CA
    Menlo Park Fire Protection District California COMMUNITY RISK ASSESSMENT: STANDARDS OF C2019OVER Community Risk Assessment: Standards of Cover Menlo Park Fire Protection District, CA Introduction The following report serves as the Menlo Park Fire Protection District’s Community Risk Assessment: Standards of Cover. It follows the Center for Fire Public Safety Excellence (CPSE) 6th Edition Community Risk Assessment: Standards of Cover model that develops written procedures to determine the distribution and concentration of a fire and emergency service agency’s fixed and mobile resources. The purpose of completing such a document is to assist the agency in ensuring a safe and effective response force for fire suppression, emergency medical services, and specialty response situations. Creating a Community Risk Assessment: Standards of Cover document requires that a number of areas be researched, studied, and evaluated. This report will begin with an overview of both the community and the agency. Following this overview, the plan will discuss areas such as risk assessment, critical task analysis, agency service-level objectives, and distribution and concentration measures. The report will provide an analysis of historical performance and will conclude with policy and operational recommendations. ESCI extends its appreciation to the elected officials, business members, and community members of the District and the cities they protect, the members of the Fire District, and all others who contributed to this plan. Menlo Park Fire Protection District Board of Directors Robert Jones President Jim McLaughlin Vice President Chick Bernstein Director Virginia Chang Kiraly Director Rob Silano Director PAGE i Community Risk Assessment: Standards of Cover Menlo Park Fire Protection District, CA Table of Contents Introduction ............................................................................................................i Table of Contents ..................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • San Francisco to San Jose Project Section
    California High-Speed Rail Authority San Francisco to San Jose Project Section Deliberative and Confidential Draft Draft Historic Architectural Survey Report May 2019 Table of Contents Deliberative and Confidential Draft TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS ....................................................................................1-1 1.1 Section 106 and CEQA Cultural Resources ............................................... 1-3 1.2 CEQA-Only Cultural Resources ................................................................. 1-4 1.3 Properties in the Area of Potential Effects that Require Phased Identification ............................................................................................... 1-4 2 REGULATORY SETTING .....................................................................................2-1 2.1 National Historic Preservation Act (54 U.S.C. § 300101 et seq.) ................ 2-1 2.1.1 Implementing Regulations for Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (36 C.F.R. Part 800) ............................. 2-1 2.2 National Environmental Policy Act .............................................................. 2-2 2.3 Section 4(f) of the Department of Transportation Act (49 U.S.C. § 303) ..... 2-2 2.4 California Environmental Quality Act (Cal. Public Res. Code § 21083.2) and CEQA Guidelines (Cal. Code Regs., tit. 14, § 15064.5) ........ 2-3 2.5 California Register of Historical Resources (Cal. Public Res. Code § 5024.1 and Cal. Code Regs., tit. 14, § 4850) .............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Bring a Toy to Donate! Sunday Performers – Golden Chordsmen the Salvation Army Brass Band Will Play Traditional Holiday Music Both Nights
    Entertainment Many thanks to our partners and sponsors! Station Entertainment Without them, the Holiday Train would not be possible. Come 30 minutes before the train arrives for Event Partners entertainment at these stations: San Francisco Face painter and balloon artist Q102 (Saturday) 102.9 KBLX (Sunday) Event will Benefit Millbrae 96.5 KOIT Burlingame Peninsula Girls Chorus ® San Mateo Burlingame and San Mateo Chamber Singers Lead Sponsors Redwood City Hometown Holidays Menlo Park West Bay Model Railroad Mary Lemmon Association Palo Alto Chamber Orchestra Conductor Sponsors Mountain View Peninsulaires Santa Clara South Bay Historical Railroad Society The Dirk and Charlene Kabcenell Foundation Santa Clara Corps of The Salvation Army Band Station Sponsors Sunnyvale 94.5 KBAY Onboard Entertainment Saturday performers – Peninsula Harmony Chorus Media Sponsors Bring a toy to donate! Sunday performers – Golden Chordsmen The Salvation Army Brass Band will play traditional holiday music both nights. 1.800.660.4287 holiday-train.org #HolidayTrain2015 In-Kind Sponsors Bayside Equipment Peterson Technical Services Company Safeway Inc. Jim’s Handyman Services San Francisco Caltrain Nothing Bundt Cakes, Station Subway San Carlos & Millbrae Holiday Train Schedule Donate a Toy! ® The Holiday Train is more than a glittering feast for the eyes – it’s also an opportunity to donate new toys or books to local children. Caltrain partners with the U.S. Marine Corps Reserve Toys for Tots and The Salvation Army to help make the season brighter for families struggling to make ends meet. Saturday, December 5 Support the Holiday Train Caltrain, in partnership with Silicon Valley Community Caltrain Station Arrive Depart Foundation, is excited to bring you the 2015 Holiday San Francisco 4:00 p.m.
    [Show full text]
  • San Mateo County Transit-Oriented Development Opportunity Study Final Report July 2007
    San Mateo County Transit-Oriented Development Opportunity Study final report July 2007 Prepared for the San Mateo County Transit District Prepared by HNTB Corporation Strategic Economics Hexagon Transportation Consultants SAN MATEO COUNTY TRANSIT-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITY STUDY Final Report July 2007 Prepared for the San Mateo County Transit District Prepared by HNTB Corporation Strategic Economics Hexagon Transportation Consultants San Mateo County TOD Opportunity Study Final Report ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS TOD Partnership Committee Core Working Group Neal Martin, City of Atherton Marisa Cravens, ABAG Carlos De Melo, City of Belmont Val Menotti, BART Randy L. Breault, City of Brisbane Bruno Peguese, BART John Swiecki, City of Brisbane Beth Thomas, Caltrans Maureen Brooks, City of Burlingame Liam Cunningham, Caltrans Andrea Ouse, Town of Colma Becky Frank, Caltrans Kevin Guy, Town of Colma Tom Madalena, C/CAG Terry Sedik, City of Daly City Valerie Knepper, MTC Arlinda Heineck, City of Menlo Park Joe Hurley, San Mateo County Transportation David Boesch, City of Menlo Park Authority Ralph Petty, City of Millbrae Duane Bay, County of San Mateo Department of Susan Moeller, City of Redwood City Housing Tambri Heyden, City of San Bruno Dorcas Cheng-Tozun, County of San Mateo Aaron Aknin, City of San Bruno Department of Housing Mark Sullivan, City of San Bruno Janet Stone, County of San Mateo Department of Elizabeth S.R. Cullinan, City of San Carlos Housing Stephen Scott, City of San Mateo Chris Mohr, Housing Leadership Council San Mateo Gary
    [Show full text]
  • AGENDA* Amended 12/18/19, Approx
    BOARD OF DIRECTORS 2019 GILLIAN GILLETT, CHAIR DAVE PINE, VICE CHAIR CHERYL BRINKMAN JEANNIE BRUINS CINDY CHAVEZ RON COLLINS DEVORA “DEV” DAVIS CHARLES STONE SHAMANN WALTON JIM HARTNETT EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR AGENDA* Amended 12/18/19, approx. 2:30 pm PENINSULA CORRIDOR JOINT POWERS BOARD Work Program – Legislative – Planning (WPLP) /Committee Meeting San Mateo County Transit District Administrative Building Bacciocco Auditorium, 2nd Floor 1250 San Carlos Avenue, San Carlos CA 94070 TELECONFERENCE LOCATION: 70 West Hedding Street, 10th Floor, Office of Supervisor Cindy Chavez, San Jose, CA 95110 December 19, 2019 – Thursday 9:00 am 1. Call to Order/Pledge of Allegiance 2. Roll Call 3. Public Comment on Items not on the Agenda Comments by each individual speaker shall be limited to three (3) minutes. Items raised that require a response will be deferred for staff reply. 4. Approve Meeting Minutes of November 26, 2019 MOTION 5. Adoption of the 2019 Title VI Program (materials added) MOTION 6. Draft Caltrain Rail Corridor Use Policy (amended) INFORMATIONAL 7. Draft Transit Oriented Development Policy (materials added) INFORMATIONAL 8. Adoption of 2020 Legislative Program MOTION 9. Committee Member Requests 10. Date/Time of Next Regular WPLP Committee Meeting: January 22, 2020 at 3:00 pm 9:00 am, San Mateo County Transit District Administrative Building, 2nd Floor, 1250 San Carlos Avenue, San Carlos, CA 94070 11. Adjourn Committee Members: Charles Stone (Chair), Cheryl Brinkman, Cindy Chavez Page 1 of 2 Work Program-Legislative-Planning (WPLP) Committee December 19, 2019 INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC All items appearing on the agenda are subject to action by the Board.
    [Show full text]
  • Connection Caltrain
    Abandoned Bikes at Caltrain Adjusts Schedule Caltrain continued from page 1 Stations Booted capacity from 48 bikes to 72 Caltrain's Transit Police force bikes. Gallery train sets already can now tag and remove bikes, accommodate up to 80 onboard Spring 2016 Connection scooters, mopeds, skateboards bicycles. Information for Customers and other devices that are block- In recognition of the addi- ing pedestrian walking areas tional bike cars, Caltrain and its and are creating potential safety Bicycle Advisory Committee held Courts Rules hazards. The Caltrain Board of InformationP a "Bikes on Bombardiers Event" Caltrain Adjusts Schedule, Directors updated its parking and at the San Francisco Caltrain storage rules for bikes and other Station Plaza in April. Blended similar vehicles as part of an Caltrain will increase its Adds Third Bike Car initiative adopted in January. parking fees July 1. The System OK daily fee to park at Caltrain recently rolled out better reflect actual departure With the ongoing ridership Caltrain can now move increases it's essential for Caltrain stations will be Suicide Prevention Walk service enhancements that will times at every station. $5.50, and the monthly improve the customer experi- For the more than 7,000 forward with plans to deliver Caltrain to maintain clear and continued from page 1 pass will be $55. ence for weekday riders. With bicyclists, capacity was an even electrified service to riders by uncluttered walkways and station 2020 after a recent California please visit http://theovernight. ridership surpassing more than bigger issue due to the limited platforms. Superior Court decision. The Parking at the Belmont donordrive.com.
    [Show full text]
  • Non-Railroad Use Compatibility
    VERSION 1.1 - AUGUST 2020 PENINSULA CORRIDOR JOINT POWERS BOARD NON-RAILROAD USE COMPATIBILITY APPLICATION This application is intended to help Caltrain staff determine if a proposed non-railroad use of Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board (JPB) property - such as utilities, commercial businesses, development proposals, or community facilities - is compatible with the railroad’s current and future needs for its property. Please consult the Caltrain website to determine if your proposed project must undergo the Caltrain Non-railroad Use Compatibility Review in compliance with the Caltrain Rail Corridor Use Policy. Please fill out all fields in the application including the project information on page 2. For additional information, please refer to the Rail Corridor Use Policy website at https://www.caltrain.com/about/doingbusiness/ Property_Access_Agreement_Process/RCUP_Review_Process.html. If you need additional assistance, please contact Caltrain staff at [email protected]. APPLICANT INFORMATION Date (mm/dd/yyyy) Legal Name of Organization or Business Business Address City State Zip Code Contact Name Contact Phone Number Contact Email Type of Organization (select one) Commercial business or developer City or government agency Utility company Other (please specify below) Other PROJECT INFORMATION Project Location (include address, parcel number, and/or describe project extents and attach RCUP map(s) with indication of project location(s)) Please attach RCUP map(s) with indication of location(s) and approximate footprint of the
    [Show full text]
  • Caltrain/California HSR Blended Operations Analysis
    CCCaaallltttrrraaaiiinnn///CCCaaallliiifffooorrrnnniiiaaa HHHSSSRRR BBBllleeennndddeeeddd OOOpppeeerrraaatttiiiooonnnsss AAAnnnaaalllyyysssiiisss PPPrrreeepppaaarrreeeddd fffooorrr::: PPPeeennniiinnnsssuuulllaaa CCCooorrrrrriiidddooorrr JJJoooiiinnnttt PPPooowwweeerrrsss BBBooaaarrrddd (((JJJPPPBBB))) PPPrrreeepppaaarrreeeddd bbbyyy::: LLLTTTKKK EEEnnngggiiinnneeeeeerrriiinnnggg SSSeeerrrvvviiiccceeesss MMMaaarrrccchhh 222000111222 This page intentionally left blank. Dear Stakeholders, Caltrain needs to be modernized. We need to implement Caltrain electrification, procure electric trains and install CBOSS PTC (an advanced signal system). These efforts will allow us to operate an electric rail service that is safer, more efficient and “greener”. The vision for Caltrain is clear and has been confirmed by the Joint Powers Board and the region. However, funding for modernizing the system has been illusive and the greatest impediment to project advancement. In 2008, the voters approved Proposition 1A which authorized state funding for high speed rail in California. This was clearly a significant milestone for the state of California, but also for Caltrain. The high speed rail project, an electrified system, has been defined to use the Caltrain corridor to reach its northern terminus, downtown San Francisco. What this means is that Caltrain and high speed rail can combine local and new resources to advance electrification of the Peninsula rail corridor. Since the passage of Proposition 1A, Caltrain and high-speed rail have been defining infrastructure
    [Show full text]
  • Caltrain Rail Corridor Use Policy Document
    CALTRAIN RAIL CORRIDOR USE POLICY Overview and Background on the Rail Corridor Use Policy The Rail Corridor Use Policy is a policy that has been adopted by the Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board (JPB) to guide the use of its property and support delivery of Caltrain’s Long-Term Service Vision. The JPB frequently receives proposals for “non-railroad uses” of its property, such as utilities, commercial businesses, development proposals, or community facilities. In accordance with the JPB’s Policy of Property Conveyance (Resolution 2010-45), the agency has an extensive review process for such proposals, including design, engineering, and regulatory review, and non-railroad uses of JPB property that have been reviewed and approved by the JPB are issued a Property Access Agreement. The first step in the review process for Property Access Agreements is for Caltrain staff to determine if the proposed use is compatible with the railroad’s current and future needs. The railroad’s future needs for its property are directly connected to achieving Caltrain’s Long-Term Service Vision, which was unanimously adopted by the Caltrain Board of Directors on October 3, 2019. Developed through the Caltrain Business Plan process, the Long-Term Service Vision describes a substantially expanded rail service on the Caltrain corridor by 2040, with a minimum of eight trains per hour operating in the peak period in each direction between San Francisco and San Jose. In order to support this growth in train service, the Caltrain Business Plan also identified the conceptual infrastructure that will be needed to operate more trains on the corridor and achieve the Long-Term Service Vision.
    [Show full text]
  • 4.9 Land Use and Planning Policy
    4. Environmental Setting, Impacts, and Mitigation Measures 4.9 Land Use and Planning Policy This section evaluates the land use-related effects of the Specific Plan. Potential land use impacts that would result from implementation of the Specific Plan are identified. This section also contains a discussion of the consistency of the Specific Plan with relevant land use policies. However, policy conflicts do not constitute, in and of themselves, a significant environmental impact. Policy conflicts are considered to be environmental impacts only when they would result in direct physical impacts. All other associated physical impacts are discussed in this EIR in specific topical sections, such as the noise, air quality, and transportation sections. 4.9.1 Environmental Setting The following section describes the existing land uses within the Plan area and summarizes relevant land use policy. Note that the City of Menlo Park street grid is offset from exact compass directions. For the purposes of this discussion, streets that run relatively parallel to the Caltrain tracks are described as running north (toward San Francisco) and south (toward San Jose). Similarly, streets that run relatively parallel to the San Francisquito Creek are described as running east (toward the San Francisco Bay) and west (toward the Santa Cruz Mountains). The location of uses and buildings are similarly described according to these directions. The Plan area is located in the City of Menlo Park in San Mateo County. Menlo Park is located on the San Francisco Peninsula, approximately 30 miles south of San Francisco and approximately 20 miles north of San Jose. The Plan area is located along El Camino Real from Watkins Avenue in the north to San Francisquito Creek in the south.
    [Show full text]