DOCSLIB.ORG

Community Risk Assessment: Standards of Cover Menlo Park Fire Protection District, CA

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Community Risk Assessment: Standards of Cover Menlo Park Fire Protection District, CA Menlo Park Fire Protection District California COMMUNITY RISK ASSESSMENT: STANDARDS OF C2019OVER Community Risk Assessment: Standards of Cover Menlo Park Fire Protection District, CA Introduction The following report serves as the Menlo Park Fire Protection District’s Community Risk Assessment: Standards of Cover. It follows the Center for Fire Public Safety Excellence (CPSE) 6th Edition Community Risk Assessment: Standards of Cover model that develops written procedures to determine the distribution and concentration of a fire and emergency service agency’s fixed and mobile resources. The purpose of completing such a document is to assist the agency in ensuring a safe and effective response force for fire suppression, emergency medical services, and specialty response situations. Creating a Community Risk Assessment: Standards of Cover document requires that a number of areas be researched, studied, and evaluated. This report will begin with an overview of both the community and the agency. Following this overview, the plan will discuss areas such as risk assessment, critical task analysis, agency service-level objectives, and distribution and concentration measures. The report will provide an analysis of historical performance and will conclude with policy and operational recommendations. ESCI extends its appreciation to the elected officials, business members, and community members of the District and the cities they protect, the members of the Fire District, and all others who contributed to this plan. Menlo Park Fire Protection District Board of Directors Robert Jones President Jim McLaughlin Vice President Chick Bernstein Director Virginia Chang Kiraly Director Rob Silano Director PAGE i Community Risk Assessment: Standards of Cover Menlo Park Fire Protection District, CA Table of Contents Introduction ............................................................................................................i Table of Contents ................................................................................................... iii Table of Figures .................................................................................................... vii Executive Summary .................................................................................................. 1 Recommendations ........................................................................................................................... 3 Description of Community S erved ................................................................................. 6 Organization Overview .....................................................................................................................6 Service Area Overview ........................................................................................................................................................ 9 Review of Services Provided............................................................................................................................................. 10 Staffing Information....................................................................................................................... 10 Resources as Currently Deployed ..................................................................................................... 11 Apparatus/Vehicles............................................................................................................................................................ 12 Apparatus Summary ......................................................................................................................................................... 14 Review of Community Expectations ............................................................................ 15 Stakeholder Input .......................................................................................................................... 15 Citizen and Business Community Members ....................................................................................................................15 Administrative Support......................................................................................................................................................17 Chief Officers, Labor Leaders, Rank & File..................................................................................................................... 18 Fire District Board, City & County Manager(s) .............................................................................................................. 19 Fire Prevention ................................................................................................................................................................... 21 Community Risk Assessment ..................................................................................... 23 Risk Classification .......................................................................................................................... 23 Population Density......................................................................................................................... 27 At-Risk Populations.........................................................................................................................31 Physical Hazards .............................................................................................................................32 Earthquakes........................................................................................................................................................................ 32 Wildfires .............................................................................................................................................................................. 34 Severe Weather...................................................................................................................................................................35 Seasonal Winds...................................................................................................................................................................37 Dam Failure .........................................................................................................................................................................37 Flood Risk .............................................................................................................................................................................37 Extreme Heat...................................................................................................................................................................... 39 Drought ...............................................................................................................................................................................40 Technological (Human-Caused) Hazards ........................................................................................... 41 Transportation ................................................................................................................................................................... 41 Infrastructure Protected ................................................................................................................. 43 Target Hazards/Critical Infrastructure and Key Resources (CIKR) ............................................................................. 43 Public Assembly ................................................................................................................................................................. 45 Schools ................................................................................................................................................................................ 46 PAGE iii Community Risk Assessment: Standards of Cover Menlo Park Fire Protection District, CA Other Critical Infrastructure ............................................................................................................ 48 Communications ................................................................................................................................................................48 Energy..................................................................................................................................................................................48 Water Distribution ............................................................................................................................................................. 49 Structural Risks...............................................................................................................................51 Very Large Homes.............................................................................................................................................................. 51 Hazardous Materials ......................................................................................................................................................... 51 Buildings Three or More Stories in Height ...................................................................................................................... 53 Large Square Footage Buildings...................................................................................................................................... 54 Comparison of Fire Risk in Other Communities .................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • City of Menlo Park TDM Existing Conditions
    City of Menlo Park TMA Options Analysis Study: Existing Conditions ___ Client: City of Menlo Park January 2020 Our ref: 23642101 Content 3 Introduction 4 Existing Travel Options 4 Rail and Transit 5 Public and Private Shuttles 6 Existing TDM Programming 8 Travel Patterns 9 Northern Menlo Park 10 Central Menlo Park 11 Downtown Menlo Park 12 Southern Menlo Park 13 Stakeholder Outreach 13 Interviews 16 Small Business Drop Ins 18 Employee Survey 22 Conclusions 23 Next Steps 2 | January 2020 City of Menlo Park: TDM Existing Conditions Introduction TMA Options Analysis for Menlo Park Menlo Park Focus Area Zones The four zones include: The City of Menlo Park has commissioned an Options This Existing Conditions Report (and subsequent 1. Northern Menlo Park (including Bohannon Dr. Analysis for establishing a Transportation reports and analyses) focuses on four areas or area) Management Association (TMA). “zones” within the City of Menlo Park. Each zone 2. Central Menlo Park faces unique challenges due to both its location and As has been seen across Silicon Valley and generally the specific land uses and industry housed within it. 3. Downtown Menlo Park the Bay Area, recent years have brought an increase 4. Southern Menlo Park (including SLAC area) in congestion in the City of Menlo Park. Transportation Demand Management (TDM) has Figure 1: Map of Menlo Park Zone Analysis been utilized for years to curb congestion by encouraging non single-occupancy vehicle travel across worksites, cities and counties in the Bay Area and beyond. As TDM is implemented in Menlo Park at a variety of levels, the City hopes that a TMA may help to better coordinate the efforts between public and private entities in the city, and potentially region-wide.
    [Show full text]
  • Transportation and Traffic
    4.13 TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC This chapter describes the existing traffic conditions of the EA Study Area and evaluates the potential envi- ronmental consequences of future development that could occur by adopting and implementing the pro- posed Housing Element Update, General Plan Consistency Update, and associated Zoning Ordinances amendments, together referred to as the “Plan Components” on transportation and traffic. A summary of the relevant regulatory setting and existing conditions is followed by a discussion of Plan Components and cumulative impacts. The chapter is based on the traffic analysis prepared by TJKM Transportation Consultants dated March 8, 2013, herein referred to as “Traffic Study.” The future baseline traffic volumes have been developed from output of the City/County Association of Governments of San Mateo County (C/CAG) travel demand model run by the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority (VTA). The travel demand associated with the Plan Components have been obtained from the C/CAG Model based upon the anticipated future land uses that have been developed resulting from the land use controls under Near-Term 2014 and 2035 condi- tions. The complete Traffic Study and technical appendices are included in Appendix F of this EA. A. Regulatory Framework 1. Federal Laws and Regulations a. Federal Highway Administration The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) is the agency of the United States (U.S.) Department of Transportation (DOT) responsible for the federally-funded roadway system, including the interstate high- way network and portions of the primary State highway network, such as Interstate 280 (I-280). b. Americans with Disabilities Act The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990 provides comprehensive rights and protections to indi- viduals with disabilities.
    [Show full text]
  • San Francisco to San Jose Project Section
    California High-Speed Rail Authority San Francisco to San Jose Project Section Deliberative and Confidential Draft Draft Historic Architectural Survey Report May 2019 Table of Contents Deliberative and Confidential Draft TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS ....................................................................................1-1 1.1 Section 106 and CEQA Cultural Resources ............................................... 1-3 1.2 CEQA-Only Cultural Resources ................................................................. 1-4 1.3 Properties in the Area of Potential Effects that Require Phased Identification ............................................................................................... 1-4 2 REGULATORY SETTING .....................................................................................2-1 2.1 National Historic Preservation Act (54 U.S.C. § 300101 et seq.) ................ 2-1 2.1.1 Implementing Regulations for Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (36 C.F.R. Part 800) ............................. 2-1 2.2 National Environmental Policy Act .............................................................. 2-2 2.3 Section 4(f) of the Department of Transportation Act (49 U.S.C. § 303) ..... 2-2 2.4 California Environmental Quality Act (Cal. Public Res. Code § 21083.2) and CEQA Guidelines (Cal. Code Regs., tit. 14, § 15064.5) ........ 2-3 2.5 California Register of Historical Resources (Cal. Public Res. Code § 5024.1 and Cal. Code Regs., tit. 14, § 4850) .............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Bring a Toy to Donate! Sunday Performers – Golden Chordsmen the Salvation Army Brass Band Will Play Traditional Holiday Music Both Nights
    Entertainment Many thanks to our partners and sponsors! Station Entertainment Without them, the Holiday Train would not be possible. Come 30 minutes before the train arrives for Event Partners entertainment at these stations: San Francisco Face painter and balloon artist Q102 (Saturday) 102.9 KBLX (Sunday) Event will Benefit Millbrae 96.5 KOIT Burlingame Peninsula Girls Chorus ® San Mateo Burlingame and San Mateo Chamber Singers Lead Sponsors Redwood City Hometown Holidays Menlo Park West Bay Model Railroad Mary Lemmon Association Palo Alto Chamber Orchestra Conductor Sponsors Mountain View Peninsulaires Santa Clara South Bay Historical Railroad Society The Dirk and Charlene Kabcenell Foundation Santa Clara Corps of The Salvation Army Band Station Sponsors Sunnyvale 94.5 KBAY Onboard Entertainment Saturday performers – Peninsula Harmony Chorus Media Sponsors Bring a toy to donate! Sunday performers – Golden Chordsmen The Salvation Army Brass Band will play traditional holiday music both nights. 1.800.660.4287 holiday-train.org #HolidayTrain2015 In-Kind Sponsors Bayside Equipment Peterson Technical Services Company Safeway Inc. Jim’s Handyman Services San Francisco Caltrain Nothing Bundt Cakes, Station Subway San Carlos & Millbrae Holiday Train Schedule Donate a Toy! ® The Holiday Train is more than a glittering feast for the eyes – it’s also an opportunity to donate new toys or books to local children. Caltrain partners with the U.S. Marine Corps Reserve Toys for Tots and The Salvation Army to help make the season brighter for families struggling to make ends meet. Saturday, December 5 Support the Holiday Train Caltrain, in partnership with Silicon Valley Community Caltrain Station Arrive Depart Foundation, is excited to bring you the 2015 Holiday San Francisco 4:00 p.m.
    [Show full text]
  • San Mateo County Transit-Oriented Development Opportunity Study Final Report July 2007
    San Mateo County Transit-Oriented Development Opportunity Study final report July 2007 Prepared for the San Mateo County Transit District Prepared by HNTB Corporation Strategic Economics Hexagon Transportation Consultants SAN MATEO COUNTY TRANSIT-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITY STUDY Final Report July 2007 Prepared for the San Mateo County Transit District Prepared by HNTB Corporation Strategic Economics Hexagon Transportation Consultants San Mateo County TOD Opportunity Study Final Report ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS TOD Partnership Committee Core Working Group Neal Martin, City of Atherton Marisa Cravens, ABAG Carlos De Melo, City of Belmont Val Menotti, BART Randy L. Breault, City of Brisbane Bruno Peguese, BART John Swiecki, City of Brisbane Beth Thomas, Caltrans Maureen Brooks, City of Burlingame Liam Cunningham, Caltrans Andrea Ouse, Town of Colma Becky Frank, Caltrans Kevin Guy, Town of Colma Tom Madalena, C/CAG Terry Sedik, City of Daly City Valerie Knepper, MTC Arlinda Heineck, City of Menlo Park Joe Hurley, San Mateo County Transportation David Boesch, City of Menlo Park Authority Ralph Petty, City of Millbrae Duane Bay, County of San Mateo Department of Susan Moeller, City of Redwood City Housing Tambri Heyden, City of San Bruno Dorcas Cheng-Tozun, County of San Mateo Aaron Aknin, City of San Bruno Department of Housing Mark Sullivan, City of San Bruno Janet Stone, County of San Mateo Department of Elizabeth S.R. Cullinan, City of San Carlos Housing Stephen Scott, City of San Mateo Chris Mohr, Housing Leadership Council San Mateo Gary
    [Show full text]
  • AGENDA* Amended 12/18/19, Approx
    BOARD OF DIRECTORS 2019 GILLIAN GILLETT, CHAIR DAVE PINE, VICE CHAIR CHERYL BRINKMAN JEANNIE BRUINS CINDY CHAVEZ RON COLLINS DEVORA “DEV” DAVIS CHARLES STONE SHAMANN WALTON JIM HARTNETT EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR AGENDA* Amended 12/18/19, approx. 2:30 pm PENINSULA CORRIDOR JOINT POWERS BOARD Work Program – Legislative – Planning (WPLP) /Committee Meeting San Mateo County Transit District Administrative Building Bacciocco Auditorium, 2nd Floor 1250 San Carlos Avenue, San Carlos CA 94070 TELECONFERENCE LOCATION: 70 West Hedding Street, 10th Floor, Office of Supervisor Cindy Chavez, San Jose, CA 95110 December 19, 2019 – Thursday 9:00 am 1. Call to Order/Pledge of Allegiance 2. Roll Call 3. Public Comment on Items not on the Agenda Comments by each individual speaker shall be limited to three (3) minutes. Items raised that require a response will be deferred for staff reply. 4. Approve Meeting Minutes of November 26, 2019 MOTION 5. Adoption of the 2019 Title VI Program (materials added) MOTION 6. Draft Caltrain Rail Corridor Use Policy (amended) INFORMATIONAL 7. Draft Transit Oriented Development Policy (materials added) INFORMATIONAL 8. Adoption of 2020 Legislative Program MOTION 9. Committee Member Requests 10. Date/Time of Next Regular WPLP Committee Meeting: January 22, 2020 at 3:00 pm 9:00 am, San Mateo County Transit District Administrative Building, 2nd Floor, 1250 San Carlos Avenue, San Carlos, CA 94070 11. Adjourn Committee Members: Charles Stone (Chair), Cheryl Brinkman, Cindy Chavez Page 1 of 2 Work Program-Legislative-Planning (WPLP) Committee December 19, 2019 INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC All items appearing on the agenda are subject to action by the Board.
    [Show full text]
  • Connection Caltrain
    Abandoned Bikes at Caltrain Adjusts Schedule Caltrain continued from page 1 Stations Booted capacity from 48 bikes to 72 Caltrain's Transit Police force bikes. Gallery train sets already can now tag and remove bikes, accommodate up to 80 onboard Spring 2016 Connection scooters, mopeds, skateboards bicycles. Information for Customers and other devices that are block- In recognition of the addi- ing pedestrian walking areas tional bike cars, Caltrain and its and are creating potential safety Bicycle Advisory Committee held Courts Rules hazards. The Caltrain Board of InformationP a "Bikes on Bombardiers Event" Caltrain Adjusts Schedule, Directors updated its parking and at the San Francisco Caltrain storage rules for bikes and other Station Plaza in April. Blended similar vehicles as part of an Caltrain will increase its Adds Third Bike Car initiative adopted in January. parking fees July 1. The System OK daily fee to park at Caltrain recently rolled out better reflect actual departure With the ongoing ridership Caltrain can now move increases it's essential for Caltrain stations will be Suicide Prevention Walk service enhancements that will times at every station. $5.50, and the monthly improve the customer experi- For the more than 7,000 forward with plans to deliver Caltrain to maintain clear and continued from page 1 pass will be $55. ence for weekday riders. With bicyclists, capacity was an even electrified service to riders by uncluttered walkways and station 2020 after a recent California please visit http://theovernight. ridership surpassing more than bigger issue due to the limited platforms. Superior Court decision. The Parking at the Belmont donordrive.com.
    [Show full text]
  • Non-Railroad Use Compatibility
    VERSION 1.1 - AUGUST 2020 PENINSULA CORRIDOR JOINT POWERS BOARD NON-RAILROAD USE COMPATIBILITY APPLICATION This application is intended to help Caltrain staff determine if a proposed non-railroad use of Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board (JPB) property - such as utilities, commercial businesses, development proposals, or community facilities - is compatible with the railroad’s current and future needs for its property. Please consult the Caltrain website to determine if your proposed project must undergo the Caltrain Non-railroad Use Compatibility Review in compliance with the Caltrain Rail Corridor Use Policy. Please fill out all fields in the application including the project information on page 2. For additional information, please refer to the Rail Corridor Use Policy website at https://www.caltrain.com/about/doingbusiness/ Property_Access_Agreement_Process/RCUP_Review_Process.html. If you need additional assistance, please contact Caltrain staff at [email protected]. APPLICANT INFORMATION Date (mm/dd/yyyy) Legal Name of Organization or Business Business Address City State Zip Code Contact Name Contact Phone Number Contact Email Type of Organization (select one) Commercial business or developer City or government agency Utility company Other (please specify below) Other PROJECT INFORMATION Project Location (include address, parcel number, and/or describe project extents and attach RCUP map(s) with indication of project location(s)) Please attach RCUP map(s) with indication of location(s) and approximate footprint of the
    [Show full text]
  • Caltrain/California HSR Blended Operations Analysis
    CCCaaallltttrrraaaiiinnn///CCCaaallliiifffooorrrnnniiiaaa HHHSSSRRR BBBllleeennndddeeeddd OOOpppeeerrraaatttiiiooonnnsss AAAnnnaaalllyyysssiiisss PPPrrreeepppaaarrreeeddd fffooorrr::: PPPeeennniiinnnsssuuulllaaa CCCooorrrrrriiidddooorrr JJJoooiiinnnttt PPPooowwweeerrrsss BBBooaaarrrddd (((JJJPPPBBB))) PPPrrreeepppaaarrreeeddd bbbyyy::: LLLTTTKKK EEEnnngggiiinnneeeeeerrriiinnnggg SSSeeerrrvvviiiccceeesss MMMaaarrrccchhh 222000111222 This page intentionally left blank. Dear Stakeholders, Caltrain needs to be modernized. We need to implement Caltrain electrification, procure electric trains and install CBOSS PTC (an advanced signal system). These efforts will allow us to operate an electric rail service that is safer, more efficient and “greener”. The vision for Caltrain is clear and has been confirmed by the Joint Powers Board and the region. However, funding for modernizing the system has been illusive and the greatest impediment to project advancement. In 2008, the voters approved Proposition 1A which authorized state funding for high speed rail in California. This was clearly a significant milestone for the state of California, but also for Caltrain. The high speed rail project, an electrified system, has been defined to use the Caltrain corridor to reach its northern terminus, downtown San Francisco. What this means is that Caltrain and high speed rail can combine local and new resources to advance electrification of the Peninsula rail corridor. Since the passage of Proposition 1A, Caltrain and high-speed rail have been defining infrastructure
    [Show full text]
  • Caltrain Rail Corridor Use Policy Document
    CALTRAIN RAIL CORRIDOR USE POLICY Overview and Background on the Rail Corridor Use Policy The Rail Corridor Use Policy is a policy that has been adopted by the Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board (JPB) to guide the use of its property and support delivery of Caltrain’s Long-Term Service Vision. The JPB frequently receives proposals for “non-railroad uses” of its property, such as utilities, commercial businesses, development proposals, or community facilities. In accordance with the JPB’s Policy of Property Conveyance (Resolution 2010-45), the agency has an extensive review process for such proposals, including design, engineering, and regulatory review, and non-railroad uses of JPB property that have been reviewed and approved by the JPB are issued a Property Access Agreement. The first step in the review process for Property Access Agreements is for Caltrain staff to determine if the proposed use is compatible with the railroad’s current and future needs. The railroad’s future needs for its property are directly connected to achieving Caltrain’s Long-Term Service Vision, which was unanimously adopted by the Caltrain Board of Directors on October 3, 2019. Developed through the Caltrain Business Plan process, the Long-Term Service Vision describes a substantially expanded rail service on the Caltrain corridor by 2040, with a minimum of eight trains per hour operating in the peak period in each direction between San Francisco and San Jose. In order to support this growth in train service, the Caltrain Business Plan also identified the conceptual infrastructure that will be needed to operate more trains on the corridor and achieve the Long-Term Service Vision.
    [Show full text]
  • 2013 Ravenswood / 4 Corners Specific Plan
    Table of Contents 1: INTRODUCTION 1 Regional and Local Setting 3 Specific Plan Area 5 Purpose and Intent of the Plan 6 Key Community-Generated Design Goals 6 Previous Planning Efforts 7 Statutory Requirements of the Specific Plan 8 Plan Contents 8 2: COMMUNITY PROCESS AND OUTREACH 11 Outreach Strategy 12 Community Meetings 13 TOD Bus Tour 14 CAC Meetings 15 Planning Commission and City Council Meetings 16 3: EXISTING CONDITIONS 17 Historic Context 18 Demographics 18 Land Use 19 Urban Design Character 23 Traffic and Circulation 27 Infrastructure 31 Hazardous Materials 33 Parks and Open Space 34 Community Services 36 Community Organizations 37 Economic Conditions and Jobs-Housing Ratios 38 RAVENSWOOD / 4 CORNERS TOD SPECIFIC PLAN CITY OF EAST PALO ALTO Table of Contents 4: VISION AND CONCEPT 41 Vision Statement 42 Plan Concept 42 Open Space and Public Amenity Concepts 48 Building Form 54 Development Potential 59 Circulation Network 59 5: GOALS AND POLICIES 63 Land Use and Community Character 64 Transportation and Traffic 75 Utilities and Public Services 79 Cultural Resources 84 6: LAND USE 87 Land Use Districts 88 Land Use Regulations 90 Development Standards 97 Performance Standards 103 7: STREETSCAPE STANDARDS 105 Street Types 106 Street Right-of-Way Standards and Guidelines 116 RAVENSWOOD / 4 CORNERS TOD SPECIFIC PLAN CITY OF EAST PALO ALTO Table of Contents 8: CIRCULATION 121 Pedestrian and Bicycle Circulation 122 Vehicular Circulation 123 Parking 126 Transit 128 9: PUBLIC UTILITIES AND SERVICES 133 Water Supply 134 Utility Infrastructure
    [Show full text]
  • 4.9 Land Use and Planning Policy
    4. Environmental Setting, Impacts, and Mitigation Measures 4.9 Land Use and Planning Policy This section evaluates the land use-related effects of the Specific Plan. Potential land use impacts that would result from implementation of the Specific Plan are identified. This section also contains a discussion of the consistency of the Specific Plan with relevant land use policies. However, policy conflicts do not constitute, in and of themselves, a significant environmental impact. Policy conflicts are considered to be environmental impacts only when they would result in direct physical impacts. All other associated physical impacts are discussed in this EIR in specific topical sections, such as the noise, air quality, and transportation sections. 4.9.1 Environmental Setting The following section describes the existing land uses within the Plan area and summarizes relevant land use policy. Note that the City of Menlo Park street grid is offset from exact compass directions. For the purposes of this discussion, streets that run relatively parallel to the Caltrain tracks are described as running north (toward San Francisco) and south (toward San Jose). Similarly, streets that run relatively parallel to the San Francisquito Creek are described as running east (toward the San Francisco Bay) and west (toward the Santa Cruz Mountains). The location of uses and buildings are similarly described according to these directions. The Plan area is located in the City of Menlo Park in San Mateo County. Menlo Park is located on the San Francisco Peninsula, approximately 30 miles south of San Francisco and approximately 20 miles north of San Jose. The Plan area is located along El Camino Real from Watkins Avenue in the north to San Francisquito Creek in the south.
    [Show full text]