DOCSLIB.ORG

City of Menlo Park TDM Existing Conditions

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
City of Menlo Park TDM Existing Conditions City of Menlo Park TMA Options Analysis Study: Existing Conditions ___ Client: City of Menlo Park January 2020 Our ref: 23642101 Content 3 Introduction 4 Existing Travel Options 4 Rail and Transit 5 Public and Private Shuttles 6 Existing TDM Programming 8 Travel Patterns 9 Northern Menlo Park 10 Central Menlo Park 11 Downtown Menlo Park 12 Southern Menlo Park 13 Stakeholder Outreach 13 Interviews 16 Small Business Drop Ins 18 Employee Survey 22 Conclusions 23 Next Steps 2 | January 2020 City of Menlo Park: TDM Existing Conditions Introduction TMA Options Analysis for Menlo Park Menlo Park Focus Area Zones The four zones include: The City of Menlo Park has commissioned an Options This Existing Conditions Report (and subsequent 1. Northern Menlo Park (including Bohannon Dr. Analysis for establishing a Transportation reports and analyses) focuses on four areas or area) Management Association (TMA). “zones” within the City of Menlo Park. Each zone 2. Central Menlo Park faces unique challenges due to both its location and As has been seen across Silicon Valley and generally the specific land uses and industry housed within it. 3. Downtown Menlo Park the Bay Area, recent years have brought an increase 4. Southern Menlo Park (including SLAC area) in congestion in the City of Menlo Park. Transportation Demand Management (TDM) has Figure 1: Map of Menlo Park Zone Analysis been utilized for years to curb congestion by encouraging non single-occupancy vehicle travel across worksites, cities and counties in the Bay Area and beyond. As TDM is implemented in Menlo Park at a variety of levels, the City hopes that a TMA may help to better coordinate the efforts between public and private entities in the city, and potentially region-wide. Work on the Options Analysis began in August, 2019 with a research phase. Through the first months of the Study, the project team conducted outreach to local employees and business groups. This was done through interviews, local business ‘drop-ins,’ and the distribution of a travel survey, which ultimately provided the team with a combination of both qualitative and quantitative information from which to lay out a description of TDM “Existing Conditions” within the City. This report lays out these existing conditions and draws conclusions that will help set up the subsequent phases of the Options Analysis. 3 | January 2020 City of Menlo Park: TDM Existing Conditions Existing Travel Options Figure 2: Map of Rail, Transit and Shuttle Options in Menlo Park Rail and Transit Transit riders to and from Menlo Park have multiple rail and transit options providing service connections to the Peninsula and the East Bay. Caltrain Commuter Rail: Caltrain provides regional commuter rail service from San Francisco to Gilroy. Menlo Park and nearby Palo Alto and Redwood City Stations have weekday and weekend service. Service to/from Menlo Park is limited, however. Some commuters may choose to use the Redwood City or Palo Alto Stations for more frequent or bullet train service. Figure 2 shows a map of rail, transit and shuttle options around Menlo Park. Many of the local transit and shuttle services connect commercial centers and office parks with the stations in Menlo Park and Palo Alto. Public Transit San Mateo County Transit District (SamTrans) provides transit service in San Mateo County in the northern peninsula. SamTrans operates three bus routes serving the Menlo Park station: • Route 296 connecting Palo Alto, Menlo Park and Redwood City Caltrain Stations • Route 286 connecting Menlo Park with points south in Atherton and Portola Valley • ECR connecting all local Caltrain stations with SFO International Airport and BART Service 4 | January 2020 City of Menlo Park: TDM Existing Conditions Existing Travel Options Figure 3: Rail and Transit Options Rail and Transit (Cont.) Valley Transit Authority (VTA) The VTA provides rail and bus service in the southern peninsula region. VTA does not provide service to/from Menlo Park, however several local and rapid routes connect to the neighboring Palo Alto Caltrain station: • Rapid Route 522 and Local 22 connecting the Palo Alto Transit Center to Eastridge Transit Center • Express 102/103 connecting Stanford Research Park to Eastridge and San Jose Alameda Contra Costa Transit District (AC Transit) AC Transit provides service primarily in the East Bay with a few transbay routes. Line U provides a transbay connection from Palo Alto (Stanford University) to Fremont via the Dumbarton Bridge. AC Transit does not provide service directly to Menlo Park. Public and Private Shuttles Several public and private shuttles provide Menlo Park rail and transit riders with connections to commercial and employment centers. Menlo Park Shuttles The City of Menlo Park operates three shuttle routes in the City of Menlo Park that are free and open to the public 5 | January 2020 City of Menlo Park: TDM Existing Conditions Existing Travel Options Figure 4: Public and Private Shuttle Options • Belle Haven route serves key civic destination in Menlo Park. • Marsh Road route connects employment centers near Bayfront Expressway and Bohannan Drive with the Caltrain Station. • Willow Road route connects destinations such as the Caltrain Station with the Civic Center and Northern Menlo Park areas as well as the VA Medical Center and O’Brien Drive. Private Shuttles Several private shuttles are operated by local developer/property managers and large employers. These shuttles are typically free to member employees only. • Tarlton operates three shuttles from Menlo Park Labs on O’Brien Drive to Palo Alto Caltrain Station, Union City BART, and San Francisco respectively. • The Stanford Bohannon (“BOH”) Shuttle provides free service from the Medical Complex on Bohannan Drive to the Menlo Park Caltrain Station to the Stanford medical campus in Palo Alto. • Facebook operates shuttles from their campus in the Northern Menlo Park area to San Francisco and the East Bay (not shown). Facebook estimates that these shuttles, which are rerouted frequently, serve up to 60,000 passengers per day. 6 | January 2020 City of Menlo Park: TDM Existing Conditions Existing TDM Programming TDM Programming in Menlo Park information daily and demonstrate that trip a shuttle system that spans the entire county. Menlo reduction goals are met. Park’s shuttles are similarly branded to In addition to encouraging non-SOV travel through Commute.org’s due to a joint contract, but they are Beyond Menlo Park the provision of transit options, the City of Menlo managed by the City of Menlo Park. Park requires that developers and property owners Of course, the City of Menlo Park does not exist in a develop programs to shift behavior among their Manzanita Talks bubble, and many trips that contribute to congestion tenants and site users. within the city start or end elsewhere. In addition to Manzanita Talks is a new symposium/partnership of Currently, the City requires that developers of new site-based and municipal programs, TMAs and similar public and private entities in Silicon Valley. While this projects work with the Transportation Division to put organizations provide services across the Bay Area. organization is still in its infancy, it ultimately hopes together TDM plans guided by the City/County to provide coordination and support to the many TMAs Association of Government’s (C/CAG) TDM Program agencies and organizations providing TDM service Guidelines, which include both site and The Bay Area is home to several official TMAs, all of across the area. programmatic elements. These plans are then meant whom serve differing groups of core constituents and to be reviewed periodically by City staff in order to offer different key services. Closest in proximity to ensure that current owners and managers are Menlo Park are the Palo Alto TMA, which focuses operating the agreed upon programs, but the City primarily on providing transit subsidies to small does not have resources or a formal mechanism in downtown businesses, and the Stanford Research place for regular review or monitoring. Park’s SRPGO program which provides shuttle service The City’s policies are more comprehensive for and other TDM programs to their tenants. Also projects located within the Bayfront Area, where nearby is the Mountain View TMA, and neighboring developers are required to submit TDM Plans and Redwood City is exploring the idea of developing a reduce trips by 25% in order to simplify their TMA as well. permitting and approvals on projects. On a case by Commute.org case basis, City staff work with developers to agree upon TDM services and programs that will be Commute.org is the TDM agency serving San Mateo offered. These may include the requirement of County. They offer services such as an online first/last mile shuttles to and from transit stations, or, commuter platform, non-SOV trip incentives and a in the case of the City’s largest employer (Facebook), guaranteed ride home program for all commuters requirements to provide them with traffic count who travel to or from the county. They also operate 7 | January 2020 City of Menlo Park: TDM Existing Conditions Travel Patterns StreetLight Data For this report, StreetLight data was pulled for The City of Menlo Park purchased access to the each of the four Focus Area Zones referenced in the Introduction, and analyzed for trip origin and StreetLight Dataset, which utilizes anonymized data destination by Census Block Group. This report from smartphones and navigation devices to display analyzes only vehicle trip data. StreetLight does travel networks, routes, and volume across North provide bicycle data, but these datasets are still in America. their infancy and are not guaranteed to be StreetLight provides what they refer to as an Origin- reliable for this purpose. The datasets have been Destination Traffic Index (O-D Index). This is a ratio of pulled, however, so the Project Team may make use of them in future stages of the project.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Alameda Countywide Transportation Model
    ALAMEDA COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION ALAMEDA COUNTYWIDE TRANSPORTATION MODEL PLAN BAY AREA 2040 UPDATE Draft Documentation Report January, 2019 Alameda Countywide Travel Model Project #: 19752 January 10, 2019 Page i TABLE OF CONTENTS Alameda Countywide Transportation Model .......................................................................... i Plan Bay Area 2040 Update.................................................................................................................................. i Table of Contents ....................................................................................................................... i List of Tables ............................................................................................................................. iii List of Figures ............................................................................................................................. v Summary ................................................................................................................................. vii Key Features ......................................................................................................................................................... vii Key Updates .......................................................................................................................................................... ix Selected Consistency Results ............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • COVER-FINAL PBA Project List.Indd
    Strategy for a Sustainable Region July 2013 Association of Bay Area Governments Metropolitan Final Plan Bay Area Transportation Commission Project List Metropolitan Association of Transportation Bay Area Commission Governments Representatives From Cities Amy Rein Worth, Chair Supervisor Mark Luce, In Each County Cities of Contra Costa County County of Napa President Mayor Bill Harrison, Dave Cortese, Vice Chair City of Fremont Santa Clara County Mayor Julie Pierce, Alameda City of Clayton Alicia C. Aguirre Vice President Mayor Tim Sbranti, Cities of San Mateo County City of Dublin Tom Azumbrado Alameda U.S. Department of Housing Representatives Mayor Julie Pierce, and Urban Development From Each County City of Clayton Tom Bates Contra Costa Supervisor Richard Valle Cities of Alameda County Councilmember Dave Hudson, Alameda David Campos City of San Ramon Supervisor Scott Haggerty City and County of San Francisco Contra Costa Alameda Bill Dodd Mayor Pat Eklund, Supervisor Karen Mitchoff Napa County and Cities City of Novato Contra Costa Marin Dorene M. Giacopini Supervisor John Gioia U.S. Department of Transportation Mayor Leon Garcia, Contra Costa City of American Canyon Federal D. Glover Supervisor Katie Rice Napa Contra Costa County Marin Mayor Edwin Lee Scott Haggerty Supervisor Mark Luce City And County of San Francisco Alameda County Napa Jason Elliott, Director, Legislative/ Anne W. Halsted Supervisor Eric Mar Government Affairs, Office of the Mayor San Francisco Bay Conservation San Francisco City And County of San Francisco and
    [Show full text]
  • All Nighter Bus Routes
    ve San Pablo Bay A lo Hilltop b Mall North Concord/ a Hilltop Dr P n y 4 a Contra Costa Wa Harbor St S an Martinez Pittsburg/ 14th St San Pablo College 80 pi Ap El Sobrante Leland Rd El Portal Dr d R 4th St 4 Bay Point s Market Ave s San Pablo a Da P m R Los Medanos d ow College ill 242 W Corte 680 Railroad Ave Buchanan Rd 13th St L St 23rd St Madera Castro St A St Concord Somersville Rd 580 Diablo Valley C Richmond College o Concord Blvd n t r Bailey Rd lv a r B d ylo C MacDonald Ave El Cerrito Ta o s t Clayton Rd Cutting Blvd Wildcat a B Canyon l MarinaWay Carlson Blvd del Norte v San Pablo Ave d HarbourWay Regional Mill A rli Park Monument Blvd e ng Valley E Blithedal Ave to n Kirker Pass Rd B M Moeser Ln lv Treat Blvd i d lle r A ve 101 Black Diamond Geary Rd Pleasant Hill California State Mines Regional Shoreline H El Cerrito Plaza d w Central Ave Rd R University East Bay Preserve E y m ill Valley P H o Concord Campus p a aci r t T a n i i d Yg r n b ise Albany e u a r D o r s M n G a i B Solano Ave r e N. Main St n iz l M lv z e 1 d ly P a Marin Ave P rs R e h d a Downtown OaklandCr 800 k C e a ek B m R Tiburon lv in d d o El centro de la ciudad de Oakland Gilman St P North ab B Berkeley lo ri Walnut d g Adult ew Berkeley a School Marin y 24 Blv Creek 580 City d 40th St University Ave Downtown Berkeley MacArthur Shattuck Ave Shattuck University of California Lafayette Angel Island S a Berkeley c Peralta St San PabloAve State Park Berkeley r a College Ave College Amtrak m 800 Station e Sausalito n Durant Ave Orinda MacArthur Blvd
    [Show full text]
  • Transportation Air Quality Conformity Analysis for the Amended Plan Bay
    The Final Transportation-Air Quality Conformity Analysis for the Amended Plan Bay Area 2040 and the 2021 Transportation Improvement Program February 2021 Bay Area Metro Center 375 Beale Street San Francisco, CA 94105 (415) 778-6700 phone [email protected] e-mail www.mtc.ca.gov web Project Staff Matt Maloney Acting Director, Planning Therese Trivedi Assistant Director Harold Brazil Senior Planner, Project Manager 2021 Transportation Improvement Program Conformity Analysis Page | i Table of Contents I. Summary of Conformity Analysis ...................................................................................................... 1 II. Transportation Control Measures .................................................................................................... 7 History of Transportation Control Measures .............................................................................. 7 Status of Transportation Control Measures................................................................................ 9 III. Response to Public Comments ...................................................................................................... 12 IV. Conformity Findings ...................................................................................................................... 13 Appendix A. List of Projects in the 2021 Transportation Improvement Program Appendix B. List of Projects in Amended Plan Bay Area 2040 2021 Transportation Improvement Program Conformity Analysis Page | ii I. Summary of Conformity Analysis The
    [Show full text]
  • Transportation and Traffic
    4.13 TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC This chapter describes the existing traffic conditions of the EA Study Area and evaluates the potential envi- ronmental consequences of future development that could occur by adopting and implementing the pro- posed Housing Element Update, General Plan Consistency Update, and associated Zoning Ordinances amendments, together referred to as the “Plan Components” on transportation and traffic. A summary of the relevant regulatory setting and existing conditions is followed by a discussion of Plan Components and cumulative impacts. The chapter is based on the traffic analysis prepared by TJKM Transportation Consultants dated March 8, 2013, herein referred to as “Traffic Study.” The future baseline traffic volumes have been developed from output of the City/County Association of Governments of San Mateo County (C/CAG) travel demand model run by the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority (VTA). The travel demand associated with the Plan Components have been obtained from the C/CAG Model based upon the anticipated future land uses that have been developed resulting from the land use controls under Near-Term 2014 and 2035 condi- tions. The complete Traffic Study and technical appendices are included in Appendix F of this EA. A. Regulatory Framework 1. Federal Laws and Regulations a. Federal Highway Administration The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) is the agency of the United States (U.S.) Department of Transportation (DOT) responsible for the federally-funded roadway system, including the interstate high- way network and portions of the primary State highway network, such as Interstate 280 (I-280). b. Americans with Disabilities Act The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990 provides comprehensive rights and protections to indi- viduals with disabilities.
    [Show full text]
  • Status 2000 Measure a Transit Improvement
    2000 MEASURE A TRANSIT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM STATUS Extend BART from Fremont through Milpitas to Downtown San Jose and the Santa Clara Caltrain Station BART ‐ Silicon Valley Program Development & Implementation BART ‐ Silicon Valley Program Development & Implementation Ongoing Warm Springs Extension (WSX) ‐ VTA Share Completed BART ‐ Silicon Valley Corridor Establishment and Maintenance Silicon Valley Corridor Establishment and Maintenance Ongoing BART ‐ Silicon Valley Extension Berryessa Extension Project (SVBX Phase I) Construction Future Extension to Santa Clara (SVSX Phase II) Under Development ‐Awaiting Funding Newhall Maintenance Facility Under Development BART Core Systems Modifications Construction BART ‐ Other Supporting Projects King Road Bus Rapid Transit Ongoing Northern Light Rail Express Completed Santa Clara Pocket Track Completed BART Transit Integration Analysis & Improvements Ongoing N. First St. Speed Improvements & First St./Tasman Ave. Modidifications Ongoing Provide Connection from Mineta San Jose International Airport to BART, Caltrain and VTA Light Rail Mineta San Jose Airport People Mover Ongoing Extend Light Rail from Downtown San Jose to The East Valley Downtown East Valley Planning & Conceptual Engineering Completed Downtown East Valley Environmental & 90% CELR Ongoing Capitol Expressway Light Rail ‐ Pedestrian Improvements Completed Capitol Expressway Light Rail ‐ Eastridge Transit Center Completed Capitol Expressway Light Rail Phase II: Light Rail to Eastridge Ongoing Low Floor Light Rail Vehicles Low Floor
    [Show full text]
  • Fy19-20 Low Carbon Transit Operations Program Allocation Award List
    Caltrans-Division of Rail and Mass Transportation FY19-20 LOW CARBON TRANSIT OPERATIONS PROGRAM ALLOCATION AWARD LIST Disadvantaged Low 1/2 Mile Low- Community Income Income Buffer Total Project Project Benefit Benefit Benefit Request SB 1119 District Project ID Lead Agency: Project Name: Type: Project Description (Short): FY19-20 City of Arcata (Arcata Mad River Transit To allow Free Transit to encourage ridership on Arcata Mad River Transit NO YES NO #N/A 1 19-20-D01-001 System) AMRTS Free Fares Operations System $13,339 This project will provide reduced fares and free ticket vouchers to raise Humboldt Transit Reduced Fares and Free awareness of public transportation. This will give riders an opportunity to NO YES NO #N/A 1 19-20-D01-002 Authority Ticket Vouchers Operations try transit at no cost. $303,307 This project provides for the purchase and installation of a solar canopy to cover the bus parking lot. The canopy will provide enough electricity to power four electric buses and the operations facility. The canopy will also shade the lot, reducing the time buses are idling prior to inspection and NO YES NO #N/A 1 19-20-D01-003 Lake Transit Authority Solar Canopy Project Capital start-up. $102,736 The project will provide unlimited free use of Lake Transit Authority bus routes anywhere in Lake, Napa, or Mendocino counties for the following: Free Fares for Community (1) any Mendocino College or Woodland College student displaying a College Students and the valid student identification and (2) any child between the age of 7 and 17 NO YES NO #N/A 1 19-20-D01-004 Lake Transit Authority Summer Cruisin' Program Operations between June 15 and August 31 (known as the Summer Cruisin' Program) $23,351 RCTA will use LCTOP funding in a three-year bus electrification project, planning an installing an electric recharge facility and augmenting an FTA bus grant to purchase an electric powered vehicle.
    [Show full text]
  • Community Risk Assessment: Standards of Cover Menlo Park Fire Protection District, CA
    Menlo Park Fire Protection District California COMMUNITY RISK ASSESSMENT: STANDARDS OF C2019OVER Community Risk Assessment: Standards of Cover Menlo Park Fire Protection District, CA Introduction The following report serves as the Menlo Park Fire Protection District’s Community Risk Assessment: Standards of Cover. It follows the Center for Fire Public Safety Excellence (CPSE) 6th Edition Community Risk Assessment: Standards of Cover model that develops written procedures to determine the distribution and concentration of a fire and emergency service agency’s fixed and mobile resources. The purpose of completing such a document is to assist the agency in ensuring a safe and effective response force for fire suppression, emergency medical services, and specialty response situations. Creating a Community Risk Assessment: Standards of Cover document requires that a number of areas be researched, studied, and evaluated. This report will begin with an overview of both the community and the agency. Following this overview, the plan will discuss areas such as risk assessment, critical task analysis, agency service-level objectives, and distribution and concentration measures. The report will provide an analysis of historical performance and will conclude with policy and operational recommendations. ESCI extends its appreciation to the elected officials, business members, and community members of the District and the cities they protect, the members of the Fire District, and all others who contributed to this plan. Menlo Park Fire Protection District Board of Directors Robert Jones President Jim McLaughlin Vice President Chick Bernstein Director Virginia Chang Kiraly Director Rob Silano Director PAGE i Community Risk Assessment: Standards of Cover Menlo Park Fire Protection District, CA Table of Contents Introduction ............................................................................................................i Table of Contents ..................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • San Francisco to San Jose Project Section
    California High-Speed Rail Authority San Francisco to San Jose Project Section Deliberative and Confidential Draft Draft Historic Architectural Survey Report May 2019 Table of Contents Deliberative and Confidential Draft TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS ....................................................................................1-1 1.1 Section 106 and CEQA Cultural Resources ............................................... 1-3 1.2 CEQA-Only Cultural Resources ................................................................. 1-4 1.3 Properties in the Area of Potential Effects that Require Phased Identification ............................................................................................... 1-4 2 REGULATORY SETTING .....................................................................................2-1 2.1 National Historic Preservation Act (54 U.S.C. § 300101 et seq.) ................ 2-1 2.1.1 Implementing Regulations for Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (36 C.F.R. Part 800) ............................. 2-1 2.2 National Environmental Policy Act .............................................................. 2-2 2.3 Section 4(f) of the Department of Transportation Act (49 U.S.C. § 303) ..... 2-2 2.4 California Environmental Quality Act (Cal. Public Res. Code § 21083.2) and CEQA Guidelines (Cal. Code Regs., tit. 14, § 15064.5) ........ 2-3 2.5 California Register of Historical Resources (Cal. Public Res. Code § 5024.1 and Cal. Code Regs., tit. 14, § 4850) .............................................
    [Show full text]
  • BOARD of DIRECTORS MEETING Thursday, August 28, 2014 5:30 PM
    BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING Thursday, August 28, 2014 5:30 PM Board of Supervisors’ Chambers County Government Center 70 West Hedding Street San Jose, CA 95110 AGENDA To help you better understand, follow, and participate in the meeting, the following information is provided: Persons wishing to address the Board of Directors on any item on the agenda or not on the agenda should complete a blue card located at the public information table and hand it to the Board Secretary staff prior to the meeting or before the item is heard. Speakers will be called to address the Board when their agenda item(s) arise during the meeting and are asked to limit their comments to 2 minutes. The amount of time allocated to speakers may vary at the Chairperson's discretion depending on the number of speakers and length of the agenda. If presenting handout materials, please provide 25 copies to the Board Secretary for distribution to the Board of Directors. The Consent Agenda items may be voted on in one motion at the beginning of the meeting under Orders of the Day. If you wish to discuss any of these items, please request the item be removed from the Consent Agenda by completing a blue card at the public information table and handing it to the Board Secretary staff prior to Orders of the Day, Agenda Item #1.2. 3331 North First Street ∙ San Jose, CA 95134-1927 ∙ Administration 408.321.5555 ∙ Customer Service 408.321.2300 AGENDA VTA Board of Directors Thursday, August 28, 2014 Disclosure of Campaign Contributions to Board Members (Government Code Section 84308) In accordance with Government Code Section 84308, no VTA Board Member shall accept, solicit, or direct a contribution of more than $250 from any party, or his or her agent, or from any participant, or his or her agent, while a proceeding involving a license, permit, or other entitlement for use is pending before the agency.
    [Show full text]
  • Bring a Toy to Donate! Sunday Performers – Golden Chordsmen the Salvation Army Brass Band Will Play Traditional Holiday Music Both Nights
    Entertainment Many thanks to our partners and sponsors! Station Entertainment Without them, the Holiday Train would not be possible. Come 30 minutes before the train arrives for Event Partners entertainment at these stations: San Francisco Face painter and balloon artist Q102 (Saturday) 102.9 KBLX (Sunday) Event will Benefit Millbrae 96.5 KOIT Burlingame Peninsula Girls Chorus ® San Mateo Burlingame and San Mateo Chamber Singers Lead Sponsors Redwood City Hometown Holidays Menlo Park West Bay Model Railroad Mary Lemmon Association Palo Alto Chamber Orchestra Conductor Sponsors Mountain View Peninsulaires Santa Clara South Bay Historical Railroad Society The Dirk and Charlene Kabcenell Foundation Santa Clara Corps of The Salvation Army Band Station Sponsors Sunnyvale 94.5 KBAY Onboard Entertainment Saturday performers – Peninsula Harmony Chorus Media Sponsors Bring a toy to donate! Sunday performers – Golden Chordsmen The Salvation Army Brass Band will play traditional holiday music both nights. 1.800.660.4287 holiday-train.org #HolidayTrain2015 In-Kind Sponsors Bayside Equipment Peterson Technical Services Company Safeway Inc. Jim’s Handyman Services San Francisco Caltrain Nothing Bundt Cakes, Station Subway San Carlos & Millbrae Holiday Train Schedule Donate a Toy! ® The Holiday Train is more than a glittering feast for the eyes – it’s also an opportunity to donate new toys or books to local children. Caltrain partners with the U.S. Marine Corps Reserve Toys for Tots and The Salvation Army to help make the season brighter for families struggling to make ends meet. Saturday, December 5 Support the Holiday Train Caltrain, in partnership with Silicon Valley Community Caltrain Station Arrive Depart Foundation, is excited to bring you the 2015 Holiday San Francisco 4:00 p.m.
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 Clean Air Plan, Volume 2
    SPARE THE AIR COOL THE CLIMATE A BLUEPRINT FOR CLEAN AIR AND CLIMATE PROTECTION IN THE BAY AREA FINAL 2017 CLEAN AIR PLAN VOLUME 2 April 19, 2017 2017 Plan Volume 2 – Table of Contents Table of Contents Page SS1: Fluid Catalytic Cracking in Refineries ..................................................................... SS-1 SS2: Equipment Leaks ..................................................................................................... SS-4 SS3: Cooling Towers ........................................................................................................ SS-7 SS4: Refinery Flares ....................................................................................................... SS-10 SS5: Sulfur Recovery Units ............................................................................................ SS-13 SS6: Refinery Fuel Gas ................................................................................................... SS-16 SS7: Sulfuric Acid Plants ................................................................................................ SS-19 SS8: Sulfur Dioxide from Petroleum Coke Calcining ..................................................... SS-22 SS9: Enhanced NSR Enforcement for Changes in Crude Slate ...................................... SS-25 SS10: Petroleum Refining Emissions Tracking .............................................................. SS-28 SS11: Petroleum Refining Facility-Wide Emissions Limits ............................................ SS-30 SS12: Petroleum Refining Climate
    [Show full text]