All Nighter Bus Routes
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
STAFF REPORT for CALENDAR ITEM NO.: 9 for the MEETING OF: September 14, 2017
STAFF REPORT FOR CALENDAR ITEM NO.: 9 FOR THE MEETING OF: September 14, 2017 TRANSBAY JOINT POWERS AUTHORITY BRIEF DESCRIPTION: Adopt rules and regulations for the TJPA’s park on the roof of the transit center, and authorize staff to proceed with requesting proposed amendments to the San Francisco Municipal Code to make TJPA’s park a “park” subject to certain rules and regulations under the Municipal Code. EXPLANATION: The 5.4-acre park and botanical garden on the roof of the Salesforce Transit Center (named “Salesforce Park” and referred to herein as “TJPA’s park”) will be a unique open space and amenity in an area of the City with few parks. TJPA’s park is expected to be a destination for visitors that will include area residents, workers, transit riders and tourists, with programs and events (activation) designed to ensure that the open space is populated throughout the daytime and evening hours of operation. The TJPA is developing a park security program that will support the following goals: • Create an exceptional visitor experience • Preserve the park’s unique ecosystem • Enable full activation of the park • Provide a safe and secure park for all users Most San Francisco parks are owned by the City and County of San Francisco; are under the control, management, and direction of the San Francisco Recreation and Park Commission and the Recreation and Parks Department staff; and are subject to the rules and regulations in the San Francisco Park Code and other provisions of the Municipal Code. The TJPA’s park, like all other San Francisco parks, requires rules and regulations to ensure the enjoyment and safety of all visitors and preservation of the public resource. -
Complete 2020 Annual Report (PDF)
2020 REPORT TO THE COMMUNITY Youth wade into Crissy Field Marsh during Project WISE in fall 2019 (See story, page 5). Crissy Field Center moves into new space at DEAR FRIEND the Tunnel Tops in 2021. We’ll improve those trails we missed so much. We’ll welcome back OF THE PARKS, our volunteers and visitors with open arms—or maybe a friendly wave. With our partners, our hat a year to start as only the second focus on making parks accessible for all—so W CEO in the history of the Golden Gate that everyone feels welcome in parks and can National Parks Conservancy. Throughout this enjoy the many health benefits of nature—is Report to the Community, we shine a light on more important now than ever. our major accomplishments of 2019. We had That’s why I’m so grateful for my first year no idea what was just around the corner. at the helm of the Parks Conservancy. I’ve I came into this job believing strongly in gotten to see the park spirit shine bright under the power of national parks to inspire and the toughest conditions. The snapshot of heal. The Bay Area shelter-in-place orders 2019 you’ll get in this report shows us what’s somehow strengthened that conviction. When possible for our long-term future, and I can’t we lose something, we miss it more than ever. wait to get there. It may take some time to And, we learn a powerful lesson in not taking recover, but with your help, our parks will it for granted. -
Alameda Countywide Transportation Model
ALAMEDA COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION ALAMEDA COUNTYWIDE TRANSPORTATION MODEL PLAN BAY AREA 2040 UPDATE Draft Documentation Report January, 2019 Alameda Countywide Travel Model Project #: 19752 January 10, 2019 Page i TABLE OF CONTENTS Alameda Countywide Transportation Model .......................................................................... i Plan Bay Area 2040 Update.................................................................................................................................. i Table of Contents ....................................................................................................................... i List of Tables ............................................................................................................................. iii List of Figures ............................................................................................................................. v Summary ................................................................................................................................. vii Key Features ......................................................................................................................................................... vii Key Updates .......................................................................................................................................................... ix Selected Consistency Results ............................................................................................................................ -
COVER-FINAL PBA Project List.Indd
Strategy for a Sustainable Region July 2013 Association of Bay Area Governments Metropolitan Final Plan Bay Area Transportation Commission Project List Metropolitan Association of Transportation Bay Area Commission Governments Representatives From Cities Amy Rein Worth, Chair Supervisor Mark Luce, In Each County Cities of Contra Costa County County of Napa President Mayor Bill Harrison, Dave Cortese, Vice Chair City of Fremont Santa Clara County Mayor Julie Pierce, Alameda City of Clayton Alicia C. Aguirre Vice President Mayor Tim Sbranti, Cities of San Mateo County City of Dublin Tom Azumbrado Alameda U.S. Department of Housing Representatives Mayor Julie Pierce, and Urban Development From Each County City of Clayton Tom Bates Contra Costa Supervisor Richard Valle Cities of Alameda County Councilmember Dave Hudson, Alameda David Campos City of San Ramon Supervisor Scott Haggerty City and County of San Francisco Contra Costa Alameda Bill Dodd Mayor Pat Eklund, Supervisor Karen Mitchoff Napa County and Cities City of Novato Contra Costa Marin Dorene M. Giacopini Supervisor John Gioia U.S. Department of Transportation Mayor Leon Garcia, Contra Costa City of American Canyon Federal D. Glover Supervisor Katie Rice Napa Contra Costa County Marin Mayor Edwin Lee Scott Haggerty Supervisor Mark Luce City And County of San Francisco Alameda County Napa Jason Elliott, Director, Legislative/ Anne W. Halsted Supervisor Eric Mar Government Affairs, Office of the Mayor San Francisco Bay Conservation San Francisco City And County of San Francisco and -
File No. 160205 Resolution No. 103-16 1
FILE NO. 160205 RESOLUTION NO. 103-16 1 [Opposing Golden Gate National Recreation Area's Proposed Rule Regulating Dog Walking] 2 3 Resolution opposing Golden Gate National Recreation Area's proposed rule regulating 4 on- and off-leash dog walking in urban parklands throughout San Francisco, Marin, and 5 San Mateo Counties. 6 7 WHEREAS, San Francisco is a densely populated urban environment where an 8 estimated 120,000 dogs reside with their families; and 9 WHEREAS, Dogs require daily exercise to live healthy lives; and 1O WHEREAS, Many residents, including dog owners, live in homes with little to no 11 outdoor space and often rely on public open space for recreation; and 12 WHEREAS, San Francisco has more than 220 parks administered by the San 13 Francisco Recreation and Park Department, of which only 28 are designated dog play areas 14 where dogs may play off-leash; and 15 WHEREAS, In addition to these dog play areas, many dog owners have also exercised 16 their dogs for decades at popular locations under the jurisdiction of the Golden Gate National 17 Recreation Area (GGNRA) and the National Park Service (NPS), such as Ocean Beach, 18 1 Baker Beach, Crissy Field, Ft. Funston, Ft. Mason, Lands End, and Sutro Heights Park; and 19 WHEREAS, The GGNRA was established in 1972 as an urban park with a goal of 20 making open space more available to a broader segment of the public and so that urban- 21 dwelling families would not have to drive far to access open space; and 22 WHEREAS, In 1973, San Francisco voters turned over 500 additional acres of city 23 · parkland - including Ocean Beach, Ft. -
Board of Supervisors |
FILE NO. 131002 RESOLUTION NO. ~ ~ b- \ ~ 1 [Opposing Golden Gate National Recreation Area's Draft Dog Walking Access Policy] 2 3 Resolution opposing the Golden Gate National Recreation Area's (GGNRA) currently 4 proposed preferred alternative for dog management; and urging the GGNRA to adopt a 5 different approach. 6 7 WHEREAS, Approximately 110,000 households in San Francisco own dogs that 8 require regular exercise; and 9 WHEREAS, San Franciscans and their dogs have traditionally enjoyed access for 1O generations to various properties under the present oversight of the Golden Gate National 11 Recreation Area (GGNRA), such as Crissy Field, Ocean Beach, Ft. Funston, Lands End, Ft. 12 Baker, Ft. Mason, Baker Beach and Sutro Heights Park; and 13 WHEREAS, The GGNRA was established, among other things, "to create an area that 14 concentrates on serving the outdoor recreation needs of the people of the metropolitan area;" 15 and 16 WHEREAS, In 1975, the City and County of San Francisco transferred Fort Funston, 17 Ocean Beach, and other city-owned lands to the federal government to be included in the 18 GGNRA and administered by the National Park Service after being given assurances that 19 recreational access and usage would be continued and protected; and 20 WHEREAS, The voters required that the deed transferring any City-owned park lands 21 to the National Park Service include the restriction that said lands were to be reserved by the 22 Park Service in perpetuity for recreation or park purposes with a right of reversion upon 23 breach -
City of Menlo Park TDM Existing Conditions
City of Menlo Park TMA Options Analysis Study: Existing Conditions ___ Client: City of Menlo Park January 2020 Our ref: 23642101 Content 3 Introduction 4 Existing Travel Options 4 Rail and Transit 5 Public and Private Shuttles 6 Existing TDM Programming 8 Travel Patterns 9 Northern Menlo Park 10 Central Menlo Park 11 Downtown Menlo Park 12 Southern Menlo Park 13 Stakeholder Outreach 13 Interviews 16 Small Business Drop Ins 18 Employee Survey 22 Conclusions 23 Next Steps 2 | January 2020 City of Menlo Park: TDM Existing Conditions Introduction TMA Options Analysis for Menlo Park Menlo Park Focus Area Zones The four zones include: The City of Menlo Park has commissioned an Options This Existing Conditions Report (and subsequent 1. Northern Menlo Park (including Bohannon Dr. Analysis for establishing a Transportation reports and analyses) focuses on four areas or area) Management Association (TMA). “zones” within the City of Menlo Park. Each zone 2. Central Menlo Park faces unique challenges due to both its location and As has been seen across Silicon Valley and generally the specific land uses and industry housed within it. 3. Downtown Menlo Park the Bay Area, recent years have brought an increase 4. Southern Menlo Park (including SLAC area) in congestion in the City of Menlo Park. Transportation Demand Management (TDM) has Figure 1: Map of Menlo Park Zone Analysis been utilized for years to curb congestion by encouraging non single-occupancy vehicle travel across worksites, cities and counties in the Bay Area and beyond. As TDM is implemented in Menlo Park at a variety of levels, the City hopes that a TMA may help to better coordinate the efforts between public and private entities in the city, and potentially region-wide. -
SUTRO HISTORIC DISTRICT Cultural Landscape Report
v 0 L u M E 2 SUTRO HISTORIC DISTRICT Cultural Landscape Report NATIONAL PARK SERVICE GOLDEN GATE NATIONAL RECREATION AREA II II II II II SUTRO HISTORIC DISTRICT II Cultural Landscape Report II II II II •II II II September 1993 II Prepared for United States Department of the Interior National Park Service II Golden Gate National Recreation Area II San Francisco, California Prepared by Land and Community Associates II Eugene, Oregon and Charlottesville, Virginia II In association with EDAW, Inc. II San Francisco, California II II II CREDITS II United States Department of the Interior II National Park Service Golden Gate National Recreation Area II Brian O'Neill, Superintendent Doug Nadeau, Chief, Resource Management & Planning II Nicholas Weeks, Project Manger, Landscape Architect Ric Borjes, Historical Architect Terri Thomas, Natural Resources Specialist/Ecologist II Jim Milestone, Ocean District Ranger Marty Mayer, Archeologist II Steve Haller, Historic Document Curator II Land and Community Associates Cultural Landscape Specialists II and Historical Landscape Architects J. Timothy Keller, FASLA, Principal-in-Charge II Robert Z. Melnick, ASLA, Principal-in-Charge Robert M. McGinnis, ASLA, Project Manager II Genevieve P. Keller, Senior Landscape Historian Katharine Lacy, ASLA, Historical Landscape Architect Liz Sargent, Landscape Architect II Julie Gronlund, Historian Frederick Schneider, Desktop Publishing II in association with II EDAW,lnc. II Landscape Architects and Planners Cheryl L. Barton, FASLA, Principal-in-Charge II Allen K. Folks, ASLA, Project Manager John G. Pelka, Environmental Planner II Misty March, Landscape Architect II II II II II II CONTENTS II 1 I MANAGEMENT SUMMARY II 1.1 Introduction and Project Background .. -
Slt-02-27-20-Issue
MARCH 3, 2020 WEEKENDPAGES WEATHER FRIDAY SATURDAY SUNDAY Shots Fired 8 & 9 Cloudy but warm GUNSHOTS FIRED ON WAKE AVENUE MILD weekend ahead VOTE ON TUESDAY HIGHS:63-68 } TUESDAY AFTERNOON, POLICE SWARM 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 YOUR VOICE YOUR OTE AREA, STILL INVESTIGATING ......................... 3 } 3 LOWS:46-51 San Leandro Times AN INDEPENDENT HOMETOWN NEWSPAPER SERVING SAN LEANDRO, ASHLAND, SAN LORENZO AND SHEFFIELD VILLAGE VOL. 30 • NO. 9 THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 27, 2020 SAN LEANDRO • CALIFORNIA People Express Ideas on Climate Action Plan San Leandrans propose local action to deal with climate change By Mike McGuire San Leandro Times San Leandrans got their because many sidewalks are in chance to help the city fight cli- poor repair. They also suggested mate change at a public meeting better lighting at night, so one can last Thursday night at the Senior see those uneven sidewalks better Community Center, attended by see CLIMATE, page 8 some 100 people. Considerable progress has been made since the city first adopted a Climate Action Plan (CAP) in 2009, said city Sustain- ability Manger Dr. Hoi-Fei Mok. Goolsby More remains to be done on the local level even as it is also dealt Challenges with at the state, national and PHOTO BY JIM KNOWLES international levels, she said. The meeting was part of an Miley for Dr. Kimberly Noble (right), director of elementary education at the San Lorenzo school district, compliments the fifth graders on the talk they gave to the school board about keeping lead out of the water. -
Directory of Participating Pharmacies
Directory of Participating Pharmacies STANDARD PHARMACY NETWORK 10/2019 Pharmacies – Statewide California • For all Individual & Family Plans other than CommunityCare HMO and EnhancedCare PPO plans • For Large Group plans, other than Salud HMO, and • For all Small Business Group (SBG) plans, other than SmartCare HMO, Salud HMO (non-grandfathered), CommunityCare HMO, and EnhancedCare PPO plans. Para español, consulte el interior. • • Coverage for every stage of life™ Directorio de Farmacias Participantes RED DE FARMACIAS ESTÁNDAR 10/2019 Farmacias – Todo el Estado California • Para todos los Planes Individuales y Familiares, excepto los planes CommunityCare HMO y EnhancedCare PPO • Para planes de Grandes Empresas, excepto los planes Salud HMO y • Para todos los planes de Pequeñas Empresas (por sus siglas en inglés, SBG), excepto los planes SmartCare HMO, Salud HMO (sin derechos adquiridos), CommunityCare HMO y EnhancedCare PPO. 10/2019 10/2019 10/2019 Table of Contents Introduction..................................................................................................................................7 Pharmacies................................................................................................................................17 I Introduction If you have prescription drug coverage through Health Net of California, Inc. or Health Net Life Insurance Company (Health Net), refer to this list of contracted pharmacies. Pharmacies are grouped by county and city. For more details about your plan benefits and the terms of your coverage, please refer to your Summary of Benefits/Disclosure Form or Evidence of Coverage. You have the right to get full and equal access to health care services covered by your health plan. This is also true if you have a disability, according to the following laws: • The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 • Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 Did you find something you think might be wrong in any of our provider directories? Please let us know so we can fix it. -
Transportation Air Quality Conformity Analysis for the Amended Plan Bay
The Final Transportation-Air Quality Conformity Analysis for the Amended Plan Bay Area 2040 and the 2021 Transportation Improvement Program February 2021 Bay Area Metro Center 375 Beale Street San Francisco, CA 94105 (415) 778-6700 phone [email protected] e-mail www.mtc.ca.gov web Project Staff Matt Maloney Acting Director, Planning Therese Trivedi Assistant Director Harold Brazil Senior Planner, Project Manager 2021 Transportation Improvement Program Conformity Analysis Page | i Table of Contents I. Summary of Conformity Analysis ...................................................................................................... 1 II. Transportation Control Measures .................................................................................................... 7 History of Transportation Control Measures .............................................................................. 7 Status of Transportation Control Measures................................................................................ 9 III. Response to Public Comments ...................................................................................................... 12 IV. Conformity Findings ...................................................................................................................... 13 Appendix A. List of Projects in the 2021 Transportation Improvement Program Appendix B. List of Projects in Amended Plan Bay Area 2040 2021 Transportation Improvement Program Conformity Analysis Page | ii I. Summary of Conformity Analysis The -
Bbb-Final-Judgment-(Filed)-102620.Pdf
RECEIVED VENTUFA t. SUPERIOR COTJRT sEP 24 2020 1 GREGORY D. TOTTEN w District Attorney of Ventura County 2 MITCHELL F. DISNEY, SBN 138114 a Senior Attorney J Deputy District 5720 Ralston Street, No. 300 s*Xrt[l'BAr*" 4 Ventura, CA 93003 FILED Telephone: (805) 662-17 06 5 Email : mitch. disney@ventura. org ocl 26 20?0 _MICI.{AEI- D. FI.AIVET 6 Attorneys for Plaintffi People of the State of California Executive Officer and Cterk -"MB"ffttBY: 7 [,4dditional Plaintiff's counsel listed as signatoriesJ 8 SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA 9 COI.INTY OF VENTURA 10 ll THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF Case No. 56-2020-00545627-CU-MC-VTA CALIFORNIA, l2 STIPULATION FOR ENTRY OF FINAL Plaintiff, JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT 13 TNJLTNCTTON AND IPRgZ6SEDI V ORDER t4 BED BATH BEYOND, INC., 15 & a New York corporation, Exemptfromfees per Gov. Code, f 6103 16 Defendant. 17 18 t9 Plaintiff, THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, generally appearing through 20 its attorneys, Gregory D. Totten, District Attorney of Ventura County; Nancy E. O'Malley, District 21 Attorney of Alameda County; Michael Ramsey, District Attorney of Butte County; Diana Becton, 22 District Attorney of Contra Costa County; Lisa A. Smittcamp, District Attorney of Fresno County; 23 Maggie Fleming, District Attorney of Humboldt County; Gilbert Otero, District Attorney of 24 Imperial Cor.rnty; Cynthia J. Zimmer, District Attorney of Kern County; Michael N. Feuer, City 25 Attomey of Los Angeles; Jackie Lacey, District Attorney of Los Angeles County; Lori Frugoli, 26 District Attorney of Marin County; Jeannine M.