DOCSLIB.ORG

Review of the Status of Introduced Non-Native Waterbird Species in the Area of the African-Eurasian Waterbird Agreement: 2007 Update

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Review of the Status of Introduced Non-Native Waterbird Species in the Area of the African-Eurasian Waterbird Agreement: 2007 Update Secretariat provided by the Workshop 3 United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) Doc TC 8.25 21 February 2008 8th MEETING OF THE TECHNICAL COMMITTEE 03 - 05 March 2008, Bonn, Germany ___________________________________________________________________________ Review of the Status of Introduced Non-Native Waterbird Species in the Area of the African-Eurasian Waterbird Agreement: 2007 Update Authors A.N. Banks, L.J. Wright, I.M.D. Maclean, C. Hann & M.M. Rehfisch February 2008 Report of work carried out by the British Trust for Ornithology under contract to AEWA Secretariat © British Trust for Ornithology British Trust for Ornithology, The Nunnery, Thetford, Norfolk IP24 2PU Registered Charity No. 216652 CONTENTS Page No. List of Tables...........................................................................................................................................5 List of Figures.........................................................................................................................................7 List of Appendices ..................................................................................................................................9 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY..................................................................................................................11 RECOMMENDATIONS .....................................................................................................................13 1. INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................................15 2. AIMS & OBJECTIVES .......................................................................................................17 3. PROJECT APPROACH ......................................................................................................19 3.1 Correspondents .....................................................................................................................19 3.2 Questionnaires.......................................................................................................................19 3.3 Literature Review .................................................................................................................19 3.4 Database.................................................................................................................................19 4. THE STATUS OF NON-NATIVE INTRODUCED WATERBIRDS IN THE AEWA AREA........................................................................................................................21 4.1 Non-Native Introduced Species Known To Have Bred More Than Five Times In The Wild................................................................................................................................21 4.1.1 Sacred Ibis Threskiornis aethiopicus.......................................................................24 4.1.2 Greater Flamingo Phoenicopterus roseus and Caribbean Flamingo Phoenicopterus ruber................................................................................................26 4.1.3 Chilean Flamingo Phoenicopterus chilensis ...........................................................28 4.1.4 White-faced Whistling Duck Dendrocygna viduata...............................................30 4.1.5 Mute Swan Cygnus olor ...........................................................................................32 4.1.6 Black Swan Cygnus atratus......................................................................................35 4.1.7 Whooper Swan Cygnus cygnus ...............................................................................38 4.1.8 Swan Goose Anser cygnoides...................................................................................39 4.1.9 Bean Goose Anser fabalis.........................................................................................41 4.1.10 Pink-footed Goose Anser brachyrhynchus..............................................................42 4.1.11 Greater White-fronted Goose Anser albifrons.......................................................44 4.1.12 Lesser White-fronted Goose Anser erythropus ......................................................45 4.1.13 Greylag Goose Anser anser......................................................................................47 4.1.14 Bar-headed Goose Anser indicus.............................................................................51 4.1.15 Snow Goose Chen caerulescens ...............................................................................53 4.1.16 Emperor Goose Chen canagicus .............................................................................54 4.1.17 Greater Canada Goose Branta canadensis & Cackling Goose Branta hutchinsii ......................................................................................................56 4.1.18 Barnacle Goose Branta leucopsis ............................................................................59 4.1.19 Upland Goose Chloephaga picta..............................................................................61 4.1.20 Egyptian Goose Alopochen aegyptiaca ...................................................................63 4.1.21 Ruddy Shelduck Tadorna ferruginea......................................................................67 4.1.22 Muscovy Duck Cairina moschata............................................................................69 4.1.23 Wood Duck Aix sponsa ............................................................................................72 4.1.24 Mandarin Aix galericulata.......................................................................................75 4.1.25 Eurasian Wigeon Anas penelope.............................................................................77 4.1.26 Gadwall Anas strepera .............................................................................................78 BTO Research Report No. 489 1 February 2008 Page No. 4.1.27 Mallard Anas platyrhynchos....................................................................................79 4.1.28 Meller’s Duck Anas melleri .....................................................................................82 4.1.29 Red-crested Pochard Netta rufina...........................................................................83 4.1.30 Ruddy Duck Oxyura jamaicensis ............................................................................85 4.1.31 Purple Swamphen Porphyrio porphyrio .................................................................88 4.2 Non-Native Introduced Species That Have Bred Up To Five Times In The Wild, Or Are Not Known To Have Bred In The Wild.................................................................89 4.2.1 Great White Pelican Pelecanus onocrotalus...........................................................90 4.2.2 Pink-backed Pelican Pelecanus rufescens ..............................................................90 4.2.3 Dalmatian Pelican Pelecanus crispus......................................................................90 4.2.4 Cattle Egret Ardea ibis.............................................................................................90 4.2.5 Black-crowned Night Heron Nycticorax nycticorax ..............................................90 4.2.6 Yellow-billed Stork Mycteria ibis ............................................................................90 4.2.7 Black Stork Ciconia nigra........................................................................................90 4.2.8 European White Stork Ciconia ciconia ..................................................................91 4.2.9 Straw-necked Ibis Threskiornis spinicollis .............................................................91 4.2.10 Scarlet Ibis Eudocimus rubber.................................................................................91 4.2.11 Glossy Ibis Plegadis falcinellus................................................................................91 4.2.12 African Spoonbill Platalea alba...............................................................................91 4.2.13 Lesser Flamingo Phoenicopterus minor..................................................................91 4.2.14 Magpie Goose Anseranas semipalmata ...................................................................92 4.2.15 Fulvous Whistling Duck Dendrocygna bicolour.....................................................92 4.2.16 Lesser Whistling Duck Dendrocygna javanica.......................................................92 4.2.17 West Indian Whistling Duck Dendrocygna arborea..............................................92 4.2.18 Black-bellied Whistling Duck Dendrocygna autumnalis.......................................92 4.2.19 Black-necked Swan Cygnus melanocorypha ..........................................................92 4.2.20 Trumpeter Swan Cygnus buccinator ......................................................................92 4.2.21 Coscoroba Swan Coscoroba coscoroba ...................................................................93 4.2.22 Ross’s Goose Chen rossii..........................................................................................93 4.2.23 Hawaiian Goose Branta sandvicensis......................................................................93 4.2.24 Brent Goose Branta bernicla ...................................................................................93 4.2.25 Red-breasted Goose Branta ruficollis .....................................................................93
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Lista Roja De Las Aves Del Uruguay 1
    Lista Roja de las Aves del Uruguay 1 Lista Roja de las Aves del Uruguay Una evaluación del estado de conservación de la avifauna nacional con base en los criterios de la Unión Internacional para la Conservación de la Naturaleza. Adrián B. Azpiroz, Laboratorio de Genética de la Conservación, Instituto de Investigaciones Biológicas Clemente Estable, Av. Italia 3318 (CP 11600), Montevideo ([email protected]). Matilde Alfaro, Asociación Averaves & Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de la República, Iguá 4225 (CP 11400), Montevideo ([email protected]). Sebastián Jiménez, Proyecto Albatros y Petreles-Uruguay, Centro de Investigación y Conservación Marina (CICMAR), Avenida Giannattasio Km 30.5. (CP 15008) Canelones, Uruguay; Laboratorio de Recursos Pelágicos, Dirección Nacional de Recursos Acuáticos, Constituyente 1497 (CP 11200), Montevideo ([email protected]). Cita sugerida: Azpiroz, A.B., M. Alfaro y S. Jiménez. 2012. Lista Roja de las Aves del Uruguay. Una evaluación del estado de conservación de la avifauna nacional con base en los criterios de la Unión Internacional para la Conservación de la Naturaleza. Dirección Nacional de Medio Ambiente, Montevideo. Descargo de responsabilidad El contenido de esta publicación es responsabilidad de los autores y no refleja necesariamente las opiniones o políticas de la DINAMA ni de las organizaciones auspiciantes y no comprometen a estas instituciones. Las denominaciones empleadas y la forma en que aparecen los datos no implica de parte de DINAMA, ni de las organizaciones auspiciantes o de los autores, juicio alguno sobre la condición jurídica de países, territorios, ciudades, personas, organizaciones, zonas o de sus autoridades, ni sobre la delimitación de sus fronteras o límites.
    [Show full text]
  • IUCN-SSC Stork, Ibis and Spoonbill Specialist Group Special Publication 2
    IUCN-SSC Stork, Ibis and Spoonbill Specialist Group Special Publication 2 Proceedings of the IX Workshop of the AEWA Eurasian Spoonbill International Expert Group Djerba Island, Tunisia, 14th - 18th November 2018 Editors: Jocelyn Champagnon, Jelena Kralj, Luis Santiago Cano Alonso and K. S. Gopi Sundar Editors-in-Chief, Special Publications, IUCN-SSC Stork, Ibis and Spoonbill Specialist Group K.S. Gopi Sundar, Co-chair IUCN Stork, Ibis and Spoonbill Specialist Group Luis Santiago Cano Alonso, Co-chair IUCN Stork, Ibis and Spoonbill Specialist Group Invited Editors for this issue Jocelyn Champagnon, Tour du Valat, Research Institute for the Conservation of Mediterranean Wetlands, Arles, France Jelena Kralj, Institute of Ornithology, Zagreb, Croatia Expert Review Board Hichem Azafzaf, Association “les Amis des Oiseaux » (AAO/BirdLife Tunisia), Tunisia Petra de Goeij, Royal NIOZ, the Netherlands Csaba Pigniczki, Kiskunság National Park Directorate, Hungary Suggested citation of this publication: Champagnon J., Kralj J., Cano Alonso, L. S. & Sundar, K. S. G. (ed.) 2019. Proceedings of the IX Workshop of the AEWA Eurasian Spoonbill International Expert Group. IUCN-SSC Stork, Ibis and Spoonbill Specialist Group Special Publication 2. Arles, France. ISBN 978-2-491451-00-4. Recommended Citation of a chapter: Marion L. 2019. Recent trends of the breeding population of Spoonbill in France 2012- 2018. Pp 19- 23. In: Champagnon J., Kralj J., Cano Alonso, L. S. & Sundar, K. S. G. (ed.) Proceedings of the IX Workshop of the AEWA Eurasian Spoonbill International Expert Group. IUCN-SSC Stork, Ibis and Spoonbill Specialist Group Special Publication 2. Arles, France. INFORMATION AND WRITING DISCLAIMER The information and opinions expressed in this publication belong to the authors.
    [Show full text]
  • Courtship of Ducklings by Adult Male Chiloe Wigeon (Anas Sibilatrix)
    October 1991] ShortCommunications 969 Natural Environment ResearchCouncil grant GR3/ LINDEN, M., & A. P. MOLLERß 1989ß Cost of repro- 7249. duction and covariation of life history traits in birds. Trends Ecol. Evol. 4: 367-371. LITERATURE CITED NUR, N. 1984. The consequencesof brood size for breeding Blue Tits I. Adult survival, weight ASKENIVIO,C. 1979. Reproductiverate and the return change and the cost of reproduction. J. Anim. rate of male Pied Flycatchers.Am. Nat. 114:748- Ecol. 53: 479-496ß 753. 1988a. The consequencesof brood size for COHEN,J. 1988. Statistical power analysis for the breeding Blue Tits III. Measuring the cost of re- behavioral sciences,second ed. New Jersey,Law- production: survival, future fecundity and dif- rence Erlbaum Assoc. ferential dispersalßEvolution 42: 351-362ß DESTEvEN,D. 1980. Clutch size, breeding success ß 1988b. The costof reproduction in birds: an and parental survival in the Tree Sparrow (Iri- examination of the evidenceß Ardea 76: 155-168. doprocnebicolor). Evolution 34: 278-291. --. 1990. The costof reproduction in birds, eval- DIJKSTRA,C., A. BULT, S. BIJLSMA,S. D^AN, T. MEIJER, uating the evidence from manipulative and non- • g. ZIJLSTRA.1990. Brood size manipulations manipulative studies. In Population biology of in the Kestrel (Falco tinnunculus):effects on off- passerinebirds, an integratedapproach (J. Blon- spring and parent survival. J.Anim. Ecol.59: 269- del, A. Gosler,J. D. Lebreton,and R. McCleery, 285. Eds.).Berlin, Springer-VerlagPressß FLEISS,J. L. 1981. Statistical methods for rates and ORELL,M., & K. KOIVULA. 1988. Costof reproduction: proportions, second ed. New York, J. Wiley and parental survival and production of recruits in Sons.
    [Show full text]
  • Endangered Species (Protection, Conser Va Tion and Regulation of Trade)
    ENDANGERED SPECIES (PROTECTION, CONSER VA TION AND REGULATION OF TRADE) THE ENDANGERED SPECIES (PROTECTION, CONSERVATION AND REGULATION OF TRADE) ACT ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS Preliminary Short title. Interpretation. Objects of Act. Saving of other laws. Exemptions, etc., relating to trade. Amendment of Schedules. Approved management programmes. Approval of scientific institution. Inter-scientific institution transfer. Breeding in captivity. Artificial propagation. Export of personal or household effects. PART I. Administration Designahem of Mana~mentand establishment of Scientific Authority. Policy directions. Functions of Management Authority. Functions of Scientific Authority. Scientific reports. PART II. Restriction on wade in endangered species 18. Restriction on trade in endangered species. 2 ENDANGERED SPECIES (PROTECTION, CONSERVATION AND REGULA TION OF TRADE) Regulation of trade in species spec fled in the First, Second, Third and Fourth Schedules Application to trade in endangered specimen of species specified in First, Second, Third and Fourth Schedule. Export of specimens of species specified in First Schedule. Importation of specimens of species specified in First Schedule. Re-export of specimens of species specified in First Schedule. Introduction from the sea certificate for specimens of species specified in First Schedule. Export of specimens of species specified in Second Schedule. Import of specimens of species specified in Second Schedule. Re-export of specimens of species specified in Second Schedule. Introduction from the sea of specimens of species specified in Second Schedule. Export of specimens of species specified in Third Schedule. Import of specimens of species specified in Third Schedule. Re-export of specimens of species specified in Third Schedule. Export of specimens specified in Fourth Schedule. PART 111.
    [Show full text]
  • Disaggregation of Bird Families Listed on Cms Appendix Ii
    Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals 2nd Meeting of the Sessional Committee of the CMS Scientific Council (ScC-SC2) Bonn, Germany, 10 – 14 July 2017 UNEP/CMS/ScC-SC2/Inf.3 DISAGGREGATION OF BIRD FAMILIES LISTED ON CMS APPENDIX II (Prepared by the Appointed Councillors for Birds) Summary: The first meeting of the Sessional Committee of the Scientific Council identified the adoption of a new standard reference for avian taxonomy as an opportunity to disaggregate the higher-level taxa listed on Appendix II and to identify those that are considered to be migratory species and that have an unfavourable conservation status. The current paper presents an initial analysis of the higher-level disaggregation using the Handbook of the Birds of the World/BirdLife International Illustrated Checklist of the Birds of the World Volumes 1 and 2 taxonomy, and identifies the challenges in completing the analysis to identify all of the migratory species and the corresponding Range States. The document has been prepared by the COP Appointed Scientific Councilors for Birds. This is a supplementary paper to COP document UNEP/CMS/COP12/Doc.25.3 on Taxonomy and Nomenclature UNEP/CMS/ScC-Sc2/Inf.3 DISAGGREGATION OF BIRD FAMILIES LISTED ON CMS APPENDIX II 1. Through Resolution 11.19, the Conference of Parties adopted as the standard reference for bird taxonomy and nomenclature for Non-Passerine species the Handbook of the Birds of the World/BirdLife International Illustrated Checklist of the Birds of the World, Volume 1: Non-Passerines, by Josep del Hoyo and Nigel J. Collar (2014); 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Ducks, Geese, and Swans of the World: Sources Cited
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Ducks, Geese, and Swans of the World by Paul A. Johnsgard Papers in the Biological Sciences 2010 Ducks, Geese, and Swans of the World: Sources Cited Paul A. Johnsgard University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/biosciducksgeeseswans Part of the Ornithology Commons Johnsgard, Paul A., "Ducks, Geese, and Swans of the World: Sources Cited" (2010). Ducks, Geese, and Swans of the World by Paul A. Johnsgard. 17. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/biosciducksgeeseswans/17 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Papers in the Biological Sciences at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Ducks, Geese, and Swans of the World by Paul A. Johnsgard by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Sources Cited Alder, L. P. 1963. The calls and displays of African and In­ Bellrose, F. C. 1976. Ducks, geese and swans of North dian pygmy geese. In Wildfowl Trust, 14th Annual America. 2d ed. Harrisburg, Pa.: Stackpole. Report, pp. 174-75. Bellrose, F. c., & Hawkins, A. S. 1947. Duck weights in Il­ Ali, S. 1960. The pink-headed duck Rhodonessa caryo­ linois. Auk 64:422-30. phyllacea (Latham). Wildfowl Trust, 11th Annual Re­ Bengtson, S. A. 1966a. [Observation on the sexual be­ port, pp. 55-60. havior of the common scoter, Melanitta nigra, on the Ali, S., & Ripley, D. 1968. Handbook of the birds of India breeding grounds, with special reference to courting and Pakistan, together with those of Nepal, Sikkim, parties.] Var Fagelvarld 25:202-26.
    [Show full text]
  • Birds of the East Texas Baptist University Campus with Birds Observed Off-Campus During BIOL3400 Field Course
    Birds of the East Texas Baptist University Campus with birds observed off-campus during BIOL3400 Field course Photo Credit: Talton Cooper Species Descriptions and Photos by students of BIOL3400 Edited by Troy A. Ladine Photo Credit: Kenneth Anding Links to Tables, Figures, and Species accounts for birds observed during May-term course or winter bird counts. Figure 1. Location of Environmental Studies Area Table. 1. Number of species and number of days observing birds during the field course from 2005 to 2016 and annual statistics. Table 2. Compilation of species observed during May 2005 - 2016 on campus and off-campus. Table 3. Number of days, by year, species have been observed on the campus of ETBU. Table 4. Number of days, by year, species have been observed during the off-campus trips. Table 5. Number of days, by year, species have been observed during a winter count of birds on the Environmental Studies Area of ETBU. Table 6. Species observed from 1 September to 1 October 2009 on the Environmental Studies Area of ETBU. Alphabetical Listing of Birds with authors of accounts and photographers . A Acadian Flycatcher B Anhinga B Belted Kingfisher Alder Flycatcher Bald Eagle Travis W. Sammons American Bittern Shane Kelehan Bewick's Wren Lynlea Hansen Rusty Collier Black Phoebe American Coot Leslie Fletcher Black-throated Blue Warbler Jordan Bartlett Jovana Nieto Jacob Stone American Crow Baltimore Oriole Black Vulture Zane Gruznina Pete Fitzsimmons Jeremy Alexander Darius Roberts George Plumlee Blair Brown Rachel Hastie Janae Wineland Brent Lewis American Goldfinch Barn Swallow Keely Schlabs Kathleen Santanello Katy Gifford Black-and-white Warbler Matthew Armendarez Jordan Brewer Sheridan A.
    [Show full text]
  • South Africa: Magoebaskloof and Kruger National Park Custom Tour Trip Report
    SOUTH AFRICA: MAGOEBASKLOOF AND KRUGER NATIONAL PARK CUSTOM TOUR TRIP REPORT 24 February – 2 March 2019 By Jason Boyce This Verreaux’s Eagle-Owl showed nicely one late afternoon, puffing up his throat and neck when calling www.birdingecotours.com [email protected] 2 | TRIP REPORT South Africa: Magoebaskloof and Kruger National Park February 2019 Overview It’s common knowledge that South Africa has very much to offer as a birding destination, and the memory of this trip echoes those sentiments. With an itinerary set in one of South Africa’s premier birding provinces, the Limpopo Province, we were getting ready for a birding extravaganza. The forests of Magoebaskloof would be our first stop, spending a day and a half in the area and targeting forest special after forest special as well as tricky range-restricted species such as Short-clawed Lark and Gurney’s Sugarbird. Afterwards we would descend the eastern escarpment and head into Kruger National Park, where we would make our way to the northern sections. These included Punda Maria, Pafuri, and the Makuleke Concession – a mouthwatering birding itinerary that was sure to deliver. A pair of Woodland Kingfishers in the fever tree forest along the Limpopo River Detailed Report Day 1, 24th February 2019 – Transfer to Magoebaskloof We set out from Johannesburg after breakfast on a clear Sunday morning. The drive to Polokwane took us just over three hours. A number of birds along the way started our trip list; these included Hadada Ibis, Yellow-billed Kite, Southern Black Flycatcher, Village Weaver, and a few brilliant European Bee-eaters.
    [Show full text]
  • Specialist Group on Storks, Ibises and Spoonbills Newsletter
    INTERNATIONAL WATERFOWL AND WETLANDS RESEARCH BUREAU/ INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL FOR BIRD PRESERVATION/ IUCN -- THE WORLD CONSERVATION UNION SPECIALIST GROUP ON STORKS, IBISES AND SPOONBILLS NEWSLETTER Volume 5, Number 1/2 November, 1992 LETTER FROM THE CO-CHAIRS improve management of small populations of endangered species. There is a great deal of exciting activity and new involvement within SIS. In April, Koen attended Initially, Michael Soull! and others began the Waldrapp Ibis Conservation meeting in Rabat, using mathematical models to examine the vulner­ Morocco (page 8). This was a productive meeting. abilities of small, threatened populations and to The increased interest and cooperation will lead to a contribute to their management (See references more unified and effective conservation effort. We below). More recently, the IUCN/SSC Captive hope that similar cooperative efforts will be generated Breeding Specialist Group has developed one for other species. aspect of the use of models. Special (PVA) meetings are held to model individual endangered In July, Malcolm attended a workshop for the species (e.g., the recent PVA meeting on the conservation of storks and cranes in the Amur River Waldrapp Ibis in Rabat). At these meetings a Basin (page 9). The meeting was well attended by single computer model is used: Vortex which was Russians, Chinese, Japanese, Koreans as well as written by Robert Lacy of the Brookfield Zoo. conservationists from Hong Kong and the United States. One working group dealt with the Oriental Because it is commonly used, the term White Stork Ciconia boyciana. We discussed and PVA has come to mean different things to differ­ summarized the conservation needs of the species.
    [Show full text]
  • Wood Duck (Aix Sponsa), EC 1606 (Oregon State University Extension
    EC 1606 • April 2007 $1.00 Wood Duck Photo: Dave Menke, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Aix sponsa by Z. Turnbull and S. Sells he wood duck is so beautiful that its populations have increased, and today scientifi c name, Aix sponsa, means populations are at healthy levels. T “water bird in bridal dress.” Being Wood ducks are very popular for hunt- so beautiful (and tasty!), by the 1880s, ing. In fact, there are more wood ducks the once-abundant wood duck was disap- harvested each year in the United States pearing quickly due to hunting and habitat than any other game bird except mallards. loss. But not just hunters appreciate wood In the 1910s, wildlife managers acted ducks. Bird watchers and other people quickly to help save wood ducks. Laws who spend time outdoors love their were passed to protect migratory birds, beauty. hunting was controlled, and habitat was Common predators of wood ducks are protected. Wood duck nest boxes were raccoons, gray and red foxes, great horned created in the 1930s. Slowly, wood duck owls, some snakes, and minks. In a group of 10 newly hatched wood ducks, usu- ally only one or two survive past their fi rst 2 weeks. Predation is a main cause of such low survival rates. Dump nests occur when one or more females follow another to her nest and add their own eggs to the fi rst female’s eggs. When this occurs, there may be 50 or more eggs. They usually are abandoned, leading to a decline in successful hatch- ings in the area.
    [Show full text]
  • Passive Citizen Science: the Role of Social Media in Wildlife Observations
    Passive citizen science: the role of social media in wildlife observations 1Y* 1Y 1Y Thomas Edwards , Christopher B. Jones , Sarah E. Perkins2, Padraig Corcoran 1 School Of Computer Science and Informatics, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK 2 School of Biosciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, CF10 3AX YThese authors contributed equally to this work. * [email protected] Abstract Citizen science plays an important role in observing the natural environment. While conventional citizen science consists of organized campaigns to observe a particular phenomenon or species there are also many ad hoc observations of the environment in social media. These data constitute a valuable resource for `passive citizen science' - the use of social media that are unconnected to any particular citizen science program, but represent an untapped dataset of ecological value. We explore the value of passive citizen science, by evaluating species distributions using the photo sharing site Flickr. The data are evaluated relative to those submitted to the National Biodiversity Network (NBN) Atlas, the largest collection of species distribution data in the UK. Our study focuses on the 1500 best represented species on NBN, and common invasive species within UK, and compares the spatial and temporal distribution with NBN data. We also introduce an innovative image verification technique that uses the Google Cloud Vision API in combination with species taxonomic data to determine the likelihood that a mention of a species on Flickr represents a given species. The spatial and temporal analyses for our case studies suggest that the Flickr dataset best reflects the NBN dataset when considering a purely spatial distribution with no time constraints.
    [Show full text]
  • The Gambia: a Taste of Africa, November 2017
    Tropical Birding - Trip Report The Gambia: A Taste of Africa, November 2017 A Tropical Birding “Chilled” SET DEPARTURE tour The Gambia A Taste of Africa Just Six Hours Away From The UK November 2017 TOUR LEADERS: Alan Davies and Iain Campbell Report by Alan Davies Photos by Iain Campbell Egyptian Plover. The main target for most people on the tour www.tropicalbirding.com +1-409-515-9110 [email protected] p.1 Tropical Birding - Trip Report The Gambia: A Taste of Africa, November 2017 Red-throated Bee-eaters We arrived in the capital of The Gambia, Banjul, early evening just as the light was fading. Our flight in from the UK was delayed so no time for any real birding on this first day of our “Chilled Birding Tour”. Our local guide Tijan and our ground crew met us at the airport. We piled into Tijan’s well used minibus as Little Swifts and Yellow-billed Kites flew above us. A short drive took us to our lovely small boutique hotel complete with pool and lovely private gardens, we were going to enjoy staying here. Having settled in we all met up for a pre-dinner drink in the warmth of an African evening. The food was delicious, and we chatted excitedly about the birds that lay ahead on this nine- day trip to The Gambia, the first time in West Africa for all our guests. At first light we were exploring the gardens of the hotel and enjoying the warmth after leaving the chilly UK behind. Both Red-eyed and Laughing Doves were easy to see and a flash of colour announced the arrival of our first Beautiful Sunbird, this tiny gem certainly lived up to its name! A bird flew in landing in a fig tree and again our jaws dropped, a Yellow-crowned Gonolek what a beauty! Shocking red below, black above with a daffodil yellow crown, we were loving Gambian birds already.
    [Show full text]