DOCSLIB.ORG

Avian Monogamy

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Avian Monogamy (ISBN: 0-943610-45-1) AVIAN MONOGAMY EDITED BY PATRICIA ADAIR GOWATY AND DOUGLAS W. MOCK Department of Zoology University of Oklahoma Norman, Oklahoma 73019 ORNITHOLOGICAL MONOGRAPHS NO. 37 PUBLISHED BY THE AMERICAN ORNITHOLOGISTS' UNION WASHINGTON, D.C. 1985 AVIAN MONOGAMY ORNITHOLOGICAL MONOGRAPHS This series, published by the American Ornithologists' Union, has been estab- lished for major papers too long for inclusion in the Union's journal, The Auk. Publication has been made possiblethrough the generosityof the late Mrs. Carll Tucker and the Marcia Brady Tucker Foundation, Inc. Correspondenceconcerning manuscripts for publication in the seriesshould be addressedto the Editor, Dr. David W. Johnston,Department of Biology, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA 22030. Copies of Ornithological Monographs may be ordered from the Assistant to the Treasurer of the AOU, Frank R. Moore, Department of Biology, University of Southern Mississippi, Southern Station Box 5018, Hattiesburg, Mississippi 39406. (See price list on back and inside back covers.) OrnithologicalMonographs,No. 37, vi + 121 pp. Editors of Ornithological Monographs, Mercedes S. Foster and David W. Johnston Special Reviewers for this issue, Walter D. Koenig, Hastings Reservation, Star Route Box 80, Carmel Valley, CA 93924; Lewis W. Oring, De- partment of Biology,Box 8238, University Station, Grand Forks, ND 58202 Authors, Patricia Adair Gowaty, Department of BiologicalSciences, Clem- son University, Clemson, SC 29631; Douglas W. Mock, Department of Zoology, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73019 First received, 23 August 1983; accepted29 February 1984; final revision completed 8 October 1984 Issued October 17, 1985 Price $11.00 prepaid ($9.00 to AOU members). Library of CongressCatalogue Card Number 85-647080 Printed by the Allen Press,Inc., Lawrence, Kansas 66044 Copyright ¸ by the American Ornithologists'Union, 1985 ISBN: 0-943610-45-1 ii AVIAN MONOGAMY EDITED BY PATRICIA ADAIR GOWATY AND DOUGLAS W. MOCK Department of Zoology University of Oklahoma Norman, Oklahoma 73019 ORNITHOLOGICAL MONOGRAPHS NO. 37 PUBLISHED BY THE AMERICAN ORNITHOLOGISTS' UNION WASHINGTON, D.C. 1985 iii TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE ...........................................................................................................................................................................................vi CHAPTER 1. AN INTRODUCTIONTO THENEGLECTED MATING SYSTEMby Douglas W. Mock ........................................................................................................................................................1 SEXUAL SELECTION AND MONOGAMY ..................................................................................................1 PUZZLES OF MONOGAMY ......................................................................................................................................3 GENERAL FACTORS FAVORING THE EVOLUTION OF MONOGAMY ...................... 4 SOME FUTURE RESEARCH DIRECTIONS ...............................................................................................5 THE COMPONENT CHAPTERS ............................................................................................................................8 CHAPTER 2. MULTIPLE PARENTAGE AND APPARENT MONOGAMY IN BIRDS by Patricia Adair Gowaty .................................................................................................................................11 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................................................11 APPARENT MONOGAMY AND MULTIPLE PARENTAGE .......................................................12 MULTIPLE PARENTAGE IN APPARENTLY MONOGAMOUS EASTERN BLUE- BIgDS ................................................................................................................................................................................13 EXPLANATIONS FOR MULTIPLE PARENTAGE .................................................................................14 CATEGORIES OF MISDIRECTED PARENTAL CARE AND UNCERTAINTY OF MATERNITY ..............................................................................................................................................................16 CONCEPTS OF MATING SYSTEMS .................................................................................................................17 CHAPTER 3. THE ORGANIZATION OF BEHAVIOR AND THE EVOLUTION OF SEXUALLYSELECTED TRAITS by Nancy Burley ......................................................................22 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................................................22 THE PROBLEMS ..................................................................................................................................................................24 SEXUAL SELECTION AND THE EVOLUTION OF SEXUAL DIMORPHISM ............. 26 EVIDENCE FOR GAPs AND PRPs ...............................................................................................................31 DISCUSSION ............................................................................................................................................................................42 CHAPTER 4. MATE PREFERENCESAND MATING PATTERNS OF CANVASBACKS (ArTHrA •'Aœ•$•VER•a)by Cynthia K. Bluhm .........................................................................45 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................................................45 METHODS .................................................................................................................................................................................47 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION ..................................................................................................................................48 CONCLUSIONS ......................................................................................................................................................................55 APPENDIX I ...........................................................................................................................................................................56 CHAPTER 5. VARIATIONSON MONOOAMYIN CANVASBACKS(.4 YTHYA L•S•NER•) by Michael G. Anderson ..................................................................................................57 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................................................57 METHODS .................................................................................................................................................................................58 RESULTS .....................................................................................................................................................................................59 DISCUSSION ............................................................................................................................................................................62 CHAPTER 6. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY MALE REPRODUCTIVE STRATE- GIESOF DABBLINGDUCKS by Frank McKinney ...................................................................68 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................................................68 SEASONAL MONOGAMY: THE BASIC ANAS MATING SYSTEM ..................................69 iv REVIEW OF MALE MATE-SUPPORT ROLES ......................................................................................71 BENEFITS OF MONOGAMY TO MALES AND FEMALES ..........................................................74 SECONDARY REPRODUCTIVE STRATEGIES COMBINED WITH MONOGAMY .... 75 COMPARISON WITH OTHER AVIAN MATING SYSTEMS ......................................................81 CONCLUSIONS ......................................................................................................................................................................81 CHAPTER 7. ADAPTIVE SIGNIFICANCE OF MONOGAMY IN THE TRUMPET MANUCODEM.4NUCODI.4 KERAUDRENII (AVEs: PARADISAEIDAE) by Bruce Beehler ........................................................................................................................................................................................83 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................................................83 METHODS .................................................................................................................................................................................85 RESULTS .....................................................................................................................................................................................87 DISCUSSION ............................................................................................................................................................................92 CHAPTER 8. THE INFLUENCE OF DEMOGRAPHY ON THE EVOLUTION OF MONOGAMYby Bertram G. Murray, Jr........................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Origins of Language in Relation to Sexual Selection: the Effect of M
    h [ { { h [ { { 9 b a { 9 [ / Ç" Ü $ 9 " ò t '(( h [ { { L " Ç" Ü $ 9 " t * " " + $ + + , - + " L " + $ -- . / !.{Çw!/Ç Language can be viewed as sexual displays from an evolutionary perspective. As both sexes in humans contribute significantly to parental care, we can expect that both males and females use language to display their favourable qualities in order to attract potential mates. In this study, 50 participants (22 male, 28 female) rated 30 vignettes, in which a male or female protagonist attempted to impress an opposite sex friend in a conversation. In both male-female and female-male flirtations, conversations reveal- ing the speaker’s positive character traits were the most highly rated while those ex- plicitly showing the speaker’s sexual interest in the potential partner were the most poorly rated. Despite the similarities, there were significant sex differences in the rat- ings of some individual vignettes and item-groups. Such differences would be chiefly discussed from an evolutionary perspective. L The origins of language surely deserve and require a great deal of discussion among researchers from a wide range of disciplines. Based on my previous essay about the sexually attractive features of language (Szeto 2009), I will look into the relationship between sexual selection and language origins in greater depth, with a special focus on the effect of mutual mate choice on sex differences in speech content. ' h [ { { Despite the prevalence of elaborate animal communication systems, it is essen- tially unequivocal that humans are the only species which possess language (Barrett, Dunbar and Lycett 2002; Hurford 2006; Workman and Reader 2004).
    [Show full text]
  • Ornithological Monographs No. 49
    OrnithologicalMonographs No.49 AvianReproductive Tactics: Femaleand Male Perspectives editors PatriciaG. Parker and Nancy Tyler Burley AVIAN REPRODUCTIVE TACTICS: FEMALE AND MALE PERSPECTIVES ORNITHOLOGICAL MONOGRAPHS Edited by JOHN M. HAGAN Manomet Center for Conservation Sciences P.O. Box 1770 Manomet, Massachusetts 02345 USA Ornithological Monographs,published by the American Ornithologists'Union, has been establishedfor major paperstoo long for inclusion in the Union's journal, The Auk. Publication has been made possiblethrough the generosityof the late Mrs. Carll Tucker and the Marcia Brady Tucker Foundation, Inc. Copies of Ornithological Monographs may be ordered from Max C. Thompson, Assistant to the Treasurer, Department of Biology, Southwestern College, 100 College St., Winfield, KS 67156. Communications may also be routed through the AOU's permanent address: Division of Ornithology, National Museum of Natural History, Washington, D.C. 20560. Editors of this issue, Patricia G. Parker and Nancy Tyler Burley. Price of OrnithologicalMonographs 49:$20.00 prepaid. Add 5 percenthan- dling and shipping charge in U.S., and 20 percent for all other countries.Make checks payable to American Ornithologists' Union. Library of CongressCatalogue Card Number 97-78467 Printed by the Allen Press, Inc., Lawrence, Kansas 66044 Issued January 29, 1998 Ornithological Monographs, No. 49 v + 195 pp. Printed by Allen Press, Inc., Lawrence, Kansas 66044 Copyright ¸ by the American Ornithologists'Union, 1997 ISBN: 0-935868-95-X AVIAN REPRODUCTIVE TACTICS: FEMALE AND MALE PERSPECTIVES EDITORS PATRICIA G. PARKER 1 and NANCY TYLER BURLEY 2 •Departmentof Zoology, 1735 Neil Avenue, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210-1293, USA 2 Departmentof Ecology and EvolutionaryBiology, University of California, Irvine, California 92697-2525, USA ORNITHOLOGICAL MONOGRAPHS NO.
    [Show full text]
  • Labile Evolution of Display Traits in Bowerbirds Indicates Reduced Effects of Phylogenetic Constraint
    Labile evolution of display traits in bowerbirds indicates reduced effects of phylogenetic constraint " # # RAB KUSMIERSKI , GERALD BORGIA , ALBERT UY " ROSS H.CROZIER " School of Genetics and Human Variation, La Trobe Uniersit, Bundoora, Victoria 3083, Australia # Department of Zoolog, Uniersit of Marland, College Park, MD 20742, USA SUMMARY Bowerbirds (Ptilonorhynchidae) have among the most exaggerated sets of display traits known, including bowers, decorated display courts and bright plumage, that differ greatly in form and degree of elaboration among species. Mapping bower and plumage traits on an independently derived phylogeny constructed from mitochondrial cytochrome b sequences revealed large differences in display traits between closely related species and convergences in both morphological and behavioural traits. Plumage characters showed no effect of phylogenetic inertia, although bowers exhibited some constraint at the more fundamental level of design, but above which they appeared free of constraint. Bowers and plumage characters, therefore, are poor indicators of phylogenetic relationship in this group. Testing Gilliard’s (1969) transferral hypothesis indicated some support for the idea that the focus of display has shifted from bird to bower in avenue-building species, but not in maypole-builders or in bowerbirds as a whole. maypole-builders (Amblornis, four spp.; Prionodura) in- 1. INTRODUCTION clude the orange-crested males of A. macgregoriae, which Bowerbirds (Ptilonorhynchidae) form a monophyletic decorate a sapling with horizontally interwoven sticks. family (Kusmierski et al. 1993) (eight genera, 19 species) The dull-coloured, monomorphic A. inornatus of endemic to Australia and New Guinea, and are unique western Irian Jaya (Arfak and Wandamen mountains) in the bird world in constructing and using a bower in and the orange-crested, dimorphic A.
    [Show full text]
  • Lista Roja De Las Aves Del Uruguay 1
    Lista Roja de las Aves del Uruguay 1 Lista Roja de las Aves del Uruguay Una evaluación del estado de conservación de la avifauna nacional con base en los criterios de la Unión Internacional para la Conservación de la Naturaleza. Adrián B. Azpiroz, Laboratorio de Genética de la Conservación, Instituto de Investigaciones Biológicas Clemente Estable, Av. Italia 3318 (CP 11600), Montevideo ([email protected]). Matilde Alfaro, Asociación Averaves & Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de la República, Iguá 4225 (CP 11400), Montevideo ([email protected]). Sebastián Jiménez, Proyecto Albatros y Petreles-Uruguay, Centro de Investigación y Conservación Marina (CICMAR), Avenida Giannattasio Km 30.5. (CP 15008) Canelones, Uruguay; Laboratorio de Recursos Pelágicos, Dirección Nacional de Recursos Acuáticos, Constituyente 1497 (CP 11200), Montevideo ([email protected]). Cita sugerida: Azpiroz, A.B., M. Alfaro y S. Jiménez. 2012. Lista Roja de las Aves del Uruguay. Una evaluación del estado de conservación de la avifauna nacional con base en los criterios de la Unión Internacional para la Conservación de la Naturaleza. Dirección Nacional de Medio Ambiente, Montevideo. Descargo de responsabilidad El contenido de esta publicación es responsabilidad de los autores y no refleja necesariamente las opiniones o políticas de la DINAMA ni de las organizaciones auspiciantes y no comprometen a estas instituciones. Las denominaciones empleadas y la forma en que aparecen los datos no implica de parte de DINAMA, ni de las organizaciones auspiciantes o de los autores, juicio alguno sobre la condición jurídica de países, territorios, ciudades, personas, organizaciones, zonas o de sus autoridades, ni sobre la delimitación de sus fronteras o límites.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative Life History of the South Temperate Cape Penduline Tit (Anthoscopus Minutus) and North Temperate Remizidae Species
    J Ornithol (2017) 158:569–577 DOI 10.1007/s10336-016-1417-4 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Comparative life history of the south temperate Cape Penduline Tit (Anthoscopus minutus) and north temperate Remizidae species 1,2 1 1 Penn Lloyd • Bernhard D. Frauenknecht • Morne´ A. du Plessis • Thomas E. Martin3 Received: 19 June 2016 / Revised: 22 October 2016 / Accepted: 14 November 2016 / Published online: 22 November 2016 Ó Dt. Ornithologen-Gesellschaft e.V. 2016 Abstract We studied the breeding biology of the south parental nestling care. Consequently, in comparison to the temperate Cape Penduline Tit (Anthoscopus minutus)in other two species, the Cape Penduline Tit exhibits greater order to compare its life history traits with those of related nest attentiveness during incubation, a similar per-nestling north temperate members of the family Remizidae, namely feeding rate and greater post-fledging survival. Its rela- the Eurasian Penduline Tit (Remiz pendulinus) and the tively large clutch size, high parental investment and Verdin (Auriparus flaviceps). We used this comparison to associated high adult mortality in a less seasonal environ- test key predictions of three hypotheses thought to explain ment are consistent with key predictions of the adult latitudinal variation in life histories among bird species— mortality hypothesis but not with key predictions of the the seasonality and food limitation hypothesis, nest pre- seasonality and food limitation hypothesis in explaining dation hypothesis and adult mortality hypothesis. Contrary life history variation among Remizidae species. These to the general pattern of smaller clutch size and lower adult results add to a growing body of evidence of the impor- mortality among south-temperate birds living in less sea- tance of age-specific mortality in shaping life history sonal environments, the Cape Penduline Tit has a clutch evolution.
    [Show full text]
  • Mouse Breeding Colony Management 1. Mouse Reproduction A. General Mouse Information I. the Average Mouse Lives Approximately
    Mouse Breeding Colony Management 1. Mouse Reproduction A. General Mouse Information i. The average mouse lives approximately 2.5 years; however, the reproductive life span of mice is significantly shorter at 7-8 months. ii. Most mice reach sexual maturity (males and females) at 4-7 weeks of age. Younger mice generally produce smaller litters and therefore are not typically mated until they reach 6-8 weeks, of age. Mice that have been housed alone or in same-sex pairs will usually not breed successfully if they are older than 6-8 months. iii. The mouse estrous cycle is 4-5 days in length. Mice cycle continuously throughout the year (non-seasonal breeders). Female mice are only receptive to males when they are in estrus. Mating typically occurs at night (lights off). Ovulation occurs 8-12 hours after the onset of estrous. iv. If fertilization occurs, fetuses can be palpated by day 14. v. Gestation in mice is typically 19-21 days (strain dependent). vi. Parturition in mice may last 1-3 hours and frequently occurs at night. Females will go into estrus within 24 hours of parturition and are sexually receptive during this time. vii. Litter size varies among strains, but averages 4-12 pups. Inbred mice tend to have smaller litters than outbred mice. viii. Mice are typically weaned at 21-28 days or at 10g of body weight. The Purdue Animal Care and Use Committee requires that mouse pups be weaned at 21 days unless PACUC approval is given on an approved animal use protocol. See Policy attached.
    [Show full text]
  • Courtship of Ducklings by Adult Male Chiloe Wigeon (Anas Sibilatrix)
    October 1991] ShortCommunications 969 Natural Environment ResearchCouncil grant GR3/ LINDEN, M., & A. P. MOLLERß 1989ß Cost of repro- 7249. duction and covariation of life history traits in birds. Trends Ecol. Evol. 4: 367-371. LITERATURE CITED NUR, N. 1984. The consequencesof brood size for breeding Blue Tits I. Adult survival, weight ASKENIVIO,C. 1979. Reproductiverate and the return change and the cost of reproduction. J. Anim. rate of male Pied Flycatchers.Am. Nat. 114:748- Ecol. 53: 479-496ß 753. 1988a. The consequencesof brood size for COHEN,J. 1988. Statistical power analysis for the breeding Blue Tits III. Measuring the cost of re- behavioral sciences,second ed. New Jersey,Law- production: survival, future fecundity and dif- rence Erlbaum Assoc. ferential dispersalßEvolution 42: 351-362ß DESTEvEN,D. 1980. Clutch size, breeding success ß 1988b. The costof reproduction in birds: an and parental survival in the Tree Sparrow (Iri- examination of the evidenceß Ardea 76: 155-168. doprocnebicolor). Evolution 34: 278-291. --. 1990. The costof reproduction in birds, eval- DIJKSTRA,C., A. BULT, S. BIJLSMA,S. D^AN, T. MEIJER, uating the evidence from manipulative and non- • g. ZIJLSTRA.1990. Brood size manipulations manipulative studies. In Population biology of in the Kestrel (Falco tinnunculus):effects on off- passerinebirds, an integratedapproach (J. Blon- spring and parent survival. J.Anim. Ecol.59: 269- del, A. Gosler,J. D. Lebreton,and R. McCleery, 285. Eds.).Berlin, Springer-VerlagPressß FLEISS,J. L. 1981. Statistical methods for rates and ORELL,M., & K. KOIVULA. 1988. Costof reproduction: proportions, second ed. New York, J. Wiley and parental survival and production of recruits in Sons.
    [Show full text]
  • Broad-Tailed Hummingbird Coloration and Sun Orientation 1
    1 Broad-tailed hummingbird coloration and sun orientation 1 Two ways to display: male hummingbirds show different 2 color-display tactics based on sun orientation 3 Running header: Broad-tailed hummingbird coloration and sun orientation 4 5 Richard K. Simpson1* and Kevin J. McGraw1 6 1School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287-4501 7 *Corresponding Author. Email: [email protected]; Phone: (480) 965-2593 8 9 ABSTRACT 10 Animals exhibit a diversity of ornaments and courtship behaviors, which often co- 11 occur and are used for communication. The sensory drive hypothesis states that these 12 traits evolved and vary due to interactions with each other, the environment, and signal 13 receiver. However, interactions between colorful ornaments and courtship behaviors, 14 specifically in relation to environmental variation, remain poorly understood. We studied 15 male iridescent plumage (gorgets), display behavior, and sun orientation during courtship 16 flights (shuttle displays) in broad-tailed hummingbirds (Selasphorus platycercus), to 17 understand how these traits interact in both space and time to produce the perceived 18 coloration of males. We also tested how gorget coloration varies among males based on 19 their plumage, behavioral, and morphological characteristics. In contrast with previous 20 work on other animals, we found that displaying males did not directionally face the sun, 21 but instead displayed on a continuum of solar orientation angles. The gorgets of males 22 who tended to face the sun during their displays appeared flashier (i.e. exhibited greater 23 color/brightness changes), brighter, and more colorful, whereas the gorgets of males who 2 Broad-tailed hummingbird coloration and sun orientation 24 tended to not face the sun were more consistently reflective (i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Breeding Aspects Ofcaiques and Pionus Parrots
    of unknown age and history. We had Any caging situ:J.tion should have a Breeding Aspects no way of knowing if a particular bird safety area such as a wire safety aisle had been pair-bonded in the wild and built around it. This will prevent ofCaiques and if it had ever bred before. Such birds escape ofthe birds should they get out often took several years to settle down of their breeding cage and prevent Pionus Parrots and to re-pair in captivity. Today there predation by animals such as rac­ are domestic, unrelated birds available coons. Caiques are especially adept at by Gail J. Wolth in the more common species. Both opening cage doors. Aves International, Pionus and Caiques have been bred to Rancho Palos Verdes, CA several generations in captivity. We are Nestboxes finding that domestic birds, even I recommend that nestboxes be con­ handfed ones, are breeding well in structed of wood. I do not like metal captivity. In general, domestic birds nestboxes as they are too cold in win­ he wonderful Pionus parrots have the advantage ofusually being of ter and too hot in summer. Metal con­ and Caiques are interesting known age. Young domestic hens are ducts heat and cold far better than does T groups of psittacines both as full ofeggs and will have a long breed­ wood. Additionally, I think the chewing breeding birds in the aviary and for ing future ahead of them. of the wooden box prompts birds to pets. Four species of Pionus and two Exercise caution when introducing breed.
    [Show full text]
  • Disaggregation of Bird Families Listed on Cms Appendix Ii
    Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals 2nd Meeting of the Sessional Committee of the CMS Scientific Council (ScC-SC2) Bonn, Germany, 10 – 14 July 2017 UNEP/CMS/ScC-SC2/Inf.3 DISAGGREGATION OF BIRD FAMILIES LISTED ON CMS APPENDIX II (Prepared by the Appointed Councillors for Birds) Summary: The first meeting of the Sessional Committee of the Scientific Council identified the adoption of a new standard reference for avian taxonomy as an opportunity to disaggregate the higher-level taxa listed on Appendix II and to identify those that are considered to be migratory species and that have an unfavourable conservation status. The current paper presents an initial analysis of the higher-level disaggregation using the Handbook of the Birds of the World/BirdLife International Illustrated Checklist of the Birds of the World Volumes 1 and 2 taxonomy, and identifies the challenges in completing the analysis to identify all of the migratory species and the corresponding Range States. The document has been prepared by the COP Appointed Scientific Councilors for Birds. This is a supplementary paper to COP document UNEP/CMS/COP12/Doc.25.3 on Taxonomy and Nomenclature UNEP/CMS/ScC-Sc2/Inf.3 DISAGGREGATION OF BIRD FAMILIES LISTED ON CMS APPENDIX II 1. Through Resolution 11.19, the Conference of Parties adopted as the standard reference for bird taxonomy and nomenclature for Non-Passerine species the Handbook of the Birds of the World/BirdLife International Illustrated Checklist of the Birds of the World, Volume 1: Non-Passerines, by Josep del Hoyo and Nigel J. Collar (2014); 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Tinamiformes – Falconiformes
    LIST OF THE 2,008 BIRD SPECIES (WITH SCIENTIFIC AND ENGLISH NAMES) KNOWN FROM THE A.O.U. CHECK-LIST AREA. Notes: "(A)" = accidental/casualin A.O.U. area; "(H)" -- recordedin A.O.U. area only from Hawaii; "(I)" = introducedinto A.O.U. area; "(N)" = has not bred in A.O.U. area but occursregularly as nonbreedingvisitor; "?" precedingname = extinct. TINAMIFORMES TINAMIDAE Tinamus major Great Tinamou. Nothocercusbonapartei Highland Tinamou. Crypturellus soui Little Tinamou. Crypturelluscinnamomeus Thicket Tinamou. Crypturellusboucardi Slaty-breastedTinamou. Crypturellus kerriae Choco Tinamou. GAVIIFORMES GAVIIDAE Gavia stellata Red-throated Loon. Gavia arctica Arctic Loon. Gavia pacifica Pacific Loon. Gavia immer Common Loon. Gavia adamsii Yellow-billed Loon. PODICIPEDIFORMES PODICIPEDIDAE Tachybaptusdominicus Least Grebe. Podilymbuspodiceps Pied-billed Grebe. ?Podilymbusgigas Atitlan Grebe. Podicepsauritus Horned Grebe. Podicepsgrisegena Red-neckedGrebe. Podicepsnigricollis Eared Grebe. Aechmophorusoccidentalis Western Grebe. Aechmophorusclarkii Clark's Grebe. PROCELLARIIFORMES DIOMEDEIDAE Thalassarchechlororhynchos Yellow-nosed Albatross. (A) Thalassarchecauta Shy Albatross.(A) Thalassarchemelanophris Black-browed Albatross. (A) Phoebetriapalpebrata Light-mantled Albatross. (A) Diomedea exulans WanderingAlbatross. (A) Phoebastriaimmutabilis Laysan Albatross. Phoebastrianigripes Black-lootedAlbatross. Phoebastriaalbatrus Short-tailedAlbatross. (N) PROCELLARIIDAE Fulmarus glacialis Northern Fulmar. Pterodroma neglecta KermadecPetrel. (A) Pterodroma
    [Show full text]
  • A 2010 Supplement to Ducks, Geese, and Swans of the World
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Ducks, Geese, and Swans of the World by Paul A. Johnsgard Papers in the Biological Sciences 2010 The World’s Waterfowl in the 21st Century: A 2010 Supplement to Ducks, Geese, and Swans of the World Paul A. Johnsgard University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/biosciducksgeeseswans Part of the Ornithology Commons Johnsgard, Paul A., "The World’s Waterfowl in the 21st Century: A 2010 Supplement to Ducks, Geese, and Swans of the World" (2010). Ducks, Geese, and Swans of the World by Paul A. Johnsgard. 20. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/biosciducksgeeseswans/20 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Papers in the Biological Sciences at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Ducks, Geese, and Swans of the World by Paul A. Johnsgard by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. The World’s Waterfowl in the 21st Century: A 200 Supplement to Ducks, Geese, and Swans of the World Paul A. Johnsgard Pages xvii–xxiii: recent taxonomic changes, I have revised sev- Introduction to the Family Anatidae eral of the range maps to conform with more current information. For these updates I have Since the 978 publication of my Ducks, Geese relied largely on Kear (2005). and Swans of the World hundreds if not thou- Other important waterfowl books published sands of publications on the Anatidae have since 978 and covering the entire waterfowl appeared, making a comprehensive literature family include an identification guide to the supplement and text updating impossible.
    [Show full text]