DOCSLIB.ORG

Courtship of Ducklings by Adult Male Chiloe Wigeon (Anas Sibilatrix)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Courtship of Ducklings by Adult Male Chiloe Wigeon (Anas Sibilatrix) October 1991] ShortCommunications 969 Natural Environment ResearchCouncil grant GR3/ LINDEN, M., & A. P. MOLLERß 1989ß Cost of repro- 7249. duction and covariation of life history traits in birds. Trends Ecol. Evol. 4: 367-371. LITERATURE CITED NUR, N. 1984. The consequencesof brood size for breeding Blue Tits I. Adult survival, weight ASKENIVIO,C. 1979. Reproductiverate and the return change and the cost of reproduction. J. Anim. rate of male Pied Flycatchers.Am. Nat. 114:748- Ecol. 53: 479-496ß 753. 1988a. The consequencesof brood size for COHEN,J. 1988. Statistical power analysis for the breeding Blue Tits III. Measuring the cost of re- behavioral sciences,second ed. New Jersey,Law- production: survival, future fecundity and dif- rence Erlbaum Assoc. ferential dispersalßEvolution 42: 351-362ß DESTEvEN,D. 1980. Clutch size, breeding success ß 1988b. The costof reproduction in birds: an and parental survival in the Tree Sparrow (Iri- examination of the evidenceß Ardea 76: 155-168. doprocnebicolor). Evolution 34: 278-291. --. 1990. The costof reproduction in birds, eval- DIJKSTRA,C., A. BULT, S. BIJLSMA,S. D^AN, T. MEIJER, uating the evidence from manipulative and non- • g. ZIJLSTRA.1990. Brood size manipulations manipulative studies. In Population biology of in the Kestrel (Falco tinnunculus):effects on off- passerinebirds, an integratedapproach (J. Blon- spring and parent survival. J.Anim. Ecol.59: 269- del, A. Gosler,J. D. Lebreton,and R. McCleery, 285. Eds.).Berlin, Springer-VerlagPressß FLEISS,J. L. 1981. Statistical methods for rates and ORELL,M., & K. KOIVULA. 1988. Costof reproduction: proportions, second ed. New York, J. Wiley and parental survival and production of recruits in Sons. the Willow Tit Parusmontanus. Oecologica 77: 423- FORBES,L.S. 1990. A note on statisticalpower. Auk 432. 107: 438-439. PETTIFOR,R. A., C. M. PERRINS,& R. H. McCLEERY. GUSTAFSSON,L., & W. J. SUTHERLAND.1988. The costs 1988. Individual optimization of clutch size in of reproduction in the Collared Flycatcher Fice- Great Tits. Nature 336: 160-162. dula albicollis. Nature 335: 813-815. REID,W. V. 1987. The cost of reproduction in the HARRIS,M.P. 1970. Breedingecology of the Swal- Glaucous-wingedGull. Oecologica74: 458-467ß low-tailed Gull Creagrusfurcatus. Auk 104: 470- ROSK•Fr,E. 1985. The effect of enlarged brood size 480. on the future reproductive potential of the Rook. HEGNER,R. E., & J. C. WINGFIELDß1987. Effects of J. Anim. Ecol. 54: 255-260. brood-sizemanipulation on parental investment, SOK•L, R. R., & F. J. ROHLF. 1981. Biometry, second breeding success,and reproductive endocrinol- ed. San Francisco, W. H. Freeman and Co. ogy of House Sparrows.Auk 104:470-480. TOFT,C. A., & P. J. SHEA. 1983. Detecting commu- KORPIM;(m,E. 1988. Costsof reproductionand suc- nity-wide patterns: estimating power strength- cessof manipulated broods under varying food ens statistical inferenceß Am. Nat. 122: 618-625. conditionsin Tengmalm'sOwl. J.Anim. Ecol.57: 1027-1039. Received19 September1990, accepted26 May 1991. Courtshipof Ducklingsby Adult Male Chiloe Wigeon(Arias sibilatrix) GWEN BREWER1 JamesFord Bell Museum of NaturalHistory, University of Minnesota,10 Church Street SE, Minneapolis,Minnesota 55455 USA Unlike mostbirds with seasonalpair bonds,many lead them away from other birdsßWhen femalesshow waterfowlpair muchin advanceof the next breeding their preferencefor one male and rejectionof others season(Rohwer and Anderson1988). For example,in by giving Inciting displays,temporary associations Holarcticdabbling ducks (Anatini), courtship and pair between males and females are formed. As bonds formationoccur up to 8 monthsbefore breeding be- strengthen, the members of a pair maintain close gins (Hepp and Hair 1983).During the early period proximity, synchronize their activities, repel rivals, of bond formation,males court femalesand try to and perform displays that reinforce the bond (Mc- Kinney in press). Pair bonds continue to be tested during spring migration and after arrival on the •Present address:Department of Biology, Frost- breedinggrounds, although most birds are pairedby burgState University, Frostburg, Maryland 21532USA. this time. 970 ShortCommunications [Auk, Vol. 108 Several hypothesesexist to accountfor the early binations of these characteristics. I identified broods timing of pair formation in the Northern Hemisphere throughout study periodsby comparingthe size and (reviewedby Rohwerand Anderson1988). Generally, age of the ducklings,the locationof the brood, and the balancebetween benefits from pairing to both the plumagecharacteristics of parents(both male and sexesand coststo malesis of major importance.Al- female attend broods)with previous information and though participatingin courtshipmay be energeti- sketchesof both parents (Brewer 1990). Ducklings cally costly to females as well as males, females are were assignedto one of seven plumage classes(Ia-c, expectedto pair as soon as possiblebecause of the IIa-c, IIIa; Gollop and Marshall 1954)and assignedto benefits(such as enhancedfeeding efficiency)that age groups on the basis of data from 15 known-age they receive when paired. Males must balance the broods(those first sighted within 1-3 days of hatch- benefitsof pairing againstthe costsof mate defense ing). I could determine the sex of ducklings ca. 8 and vigilance, so that the exact timing of pair for- weeks of age (classIIc) from wing patterns (males mation will be determined largely by the male. have darker speculaand bright white upper wing Although the courtship displays of most tropical coverts)and from the presenceof a two-syllablewhis- and SouthernHemisphere dabbling ducks have been tle given only by males (method confirmed in cap- described(Johnsgard 1965), the timing of courtship tivity for 14 ducklings,pets. obs.). Six ducklingswere and pair formation for thesespecies is poorly docu- identified by the unique pattern of down and feathers mented.In theseregions, the timing of pair formation on their heads and bodies. may be influencedby variable or irregular breeding Male courtshipactivity.--In general,male courtship seasonsand the lack of seasonalor molt migrations of ducklingswas similar to male courtshipof adult (McKinney 1985, Oring and Saylet in press).In sev- females (Johnsgard1965; pets. obs.). Males directed eral SouthAmerican species, including the migratory four courtshipdisplays at ducklings (Rakoo,Display Chiloe Wigeon (Anassibilatrix), courtship activity has Shake, Grunt-whistle,and Preen-behind-the-wing; been noted before the end of the breeding season Johnsgard1965, Brewer 1990) and performed Pre- (Weller 1968),but the significanceof this exception- copulatory Head-pumping (Johnsgard 1965) near ally early courtship is unknown. I found that un- them. Group flightswith I-2 juvenile femalesand 2- pairedmales court and form bondswith ducklingsas 8 adult males,similar to courtshipflights described part of a pair formationprocess in Chiloe Wigeon. I for adult American Wigeon (Anasamericana; Wishart know of no previous descriptionsof this behavior in 1983),occurred late in the study period. I identified any waterfowl species. the intendedreceiver of a displayby noting the body Courtshipof ducklingswas discoveredincidentally orientationof the performer(McKinney in press),and during a study of biparental care in Chiloe Wigeon I considerhere only thosedisplays that were unam- (Decemberthrough February, 1985-1988;total 500 h biguouslydirected at ducklings(60 displayswere di- of observation)at five locationsin southernArgentina rectedat paired females;no unpaired femaleswere within 70 km of San Carlos de Bariloche (41ø08'S, present). 71ø15'W)and one location in BuenosAires province For 12 known-agebroods, the age at which duck- (38ø51'S,60ø05'W). Although similar trends in court- lings were first courtedranged from 9 days(class Ib) ship were observedat all six areas,I focusedon data to 33 days (classIIa) (mean [+SD] = 21 + 6.6). The from the three main study areasin southernArgen- number of displayingmales at one locationranged tina: Laguna Los Juncos,Estancia San Ramon, and from oneto 23,with up to sevenmales simultaneously Arroyo Pilcaniyeu (locationsand characteristicsfur- courting one or more ducklings. No male parents ther describedin McKinney and Brewer 1989). Fam- courtedtheir own ducklings,although mostpairs ac- ilies or courting maleswith ducklingswere observed companiedthem until ducklingswere at least6 weeks during 30- to 60-min periodsat all timesof day using old. Male ducklingsor juvenilesdid not courtfemales focal animal sampling (Altmann 1974) to record be- during the study period. havioral interactions and the activities of males, fe- Almostall courtshipdirected at ducklings(2,800 of males,and ducklingsevery 30 s. I observedcourtship 2,810displays) was performedby adult malesjudged during 14 days (45 h of observation)at EstanciaSan to be unpaired becausethey did not associatewith Ramon,35 days(102 h) at Arroyo Pilcaniyeu, 19 days an adult female for at least I h or exhibit behavior (22 h) at Languna Los Juncos,and 25 days (22 h) at seen when pairs are separated.(Courtship of duck- the other three locations. lings did not startuntil after mostbroods had hatched, Although individuals were not marked, all 28 pairs and it was very unlikely that paired maleswould be of parents and their broods, 15 courting males, and away from their own matesfor such long periods.) 6 eight-week-old ducklings were identified consis- These males increasedas a proportion of the local tently by morphologicalfeatures.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Lista Roja De Las Aves Del Uruguay 1
    Lista Roja de las Aves del Uruguay 1 Lista Roja de las Aves del Uruguay Una evaluación del estado de conservación de la avifauna nacional con base en los criterios de la Unión Internacional para la Conservación de la Naturaleza. Adrián B. Azpiroz, Laboratorio de Genética de la Conservación, Instituto de Investigaciones Biológicas Clemente Estable, Av. Italia 3318 (CP 11600), Montevideo ([email protected]). Matilde Alfaro, Asociación Averaves & Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de la República, Iguá 4225 (CP 11400), Montevideo ([email protected]). Sebastián Jiménez, Proyecto Albatros y Petreles-Uruguay, Centro de Investigación y Conservación Marina (CICMAR), Avenida Giannattasio Km 30.5. (CP 15008) Canelones, Uruguay; Laboratorio de Recursos Pelágicos, Dirección Nacional de Recursos Acuáticos, Constituyente 1497 (CP 11200), Montevideo ([email protected]). Cita sugerida: Azpiroz, A.B., M. Alfaro y S. Jiménez. 2012. Lista Roja de las Aves del Uruguay. Una evaluación del estado de conservación de la avifauna nacional con base en los criterios de la Unión Internacional para la Conservación de la Naturaleza. Dirección Nacional de Medio Ambiente, Montevideo. Descargo de responsabilidad El contenido de esta publicación es responsabilidad de los autores y no refleja necesariamente las opiniones o políticas de la DINAMA ni de las organizaciones auspiciantes y no comprometen a estas instituciones. Las denominaciones empleadas y la forma en que aparecen los datos no implica de parte de DINAMA, ni de las organizaciones auspiciantes o de los autores, juicio alguno sobre la condición jurídica de países, territorios, ciudades, personas, organizaciones, zonas o de sus autoridades, ni sobre la delimitación de sus fronteras o límites.
    [Show full text]
  • Disaggregation of Bird Families Listed on Cms Appendix Ii
    Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals 2nd Meeting of the Sessional Committee of the CMS Scientific Council (ScC-SC2) Bonn, Germany, 10 – 14 July 2017 UNEP/CMS/ScC-SC2/Inf.3 DISAGGREGATION OF BIRD FAMILIES LISTED ON CMS APPENDIX II (Prepared by the Appointed Councillors for Birds) Summary: The first meeting of the Sessional Committee of the Scientific Council identified the adoption of a new standard reference for avian taxonomy as an opportunity to disaggregate the higher-level taxa listed on Appendix II and to identify those that are considered to be migratory species and that have an unfavourable conservation status. The current paper presents an initial analysis of the higher-level disaggregation using the Handbook of the Birds of the World/BirdLife International Illustrated Checklist of the Birds of the World Volumes 1 and 2 taxonomy, and identifies the challenges in completing the analysis to identify all of the migratory species and the corresponding Range States. The document has been prepared by the COP Appointed Scientific Councilors for Birds. This is a supplementary paper to COP document UNEP/CMS/COP12/Doc.25.3 on Taxonomy and Nomenclature UNEP/CMS/ScC-Sc2/Inf.3 DISAGGREGATION OF BIRD FAMILIES LISTED ON CMS APPENDIX II 1. Through Resolution 11.19, the Conference of Parties adopted as the standard reference for bird taxonomy and nomenclature for Non-Passerine species the Handbook of the Birds of the World/BirdLife International Illustrated Checklist of the Birds of the World, Volume 1: Non-Passerines, by Josep del Hoyo and Nigel J. Collar (2014); 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 1: Maps and Plans Appendix184 Map 1: Conservation Categories for the Nominated Property
    Appendix 1: Maps and Plans Appendix184 Map 1: Conservation Categories for the Nominated Property. Los Alerces National Park, Argentina 185 Map 2: Andean-North Patagonian Biosphere Reserve: Context for the Nominated Proprty. Los Alerces National Park, Argentina 186 Map 3: Vegetation of the Valdivian Ecoregion 187 Map 4: Vegetation Communities in Los Alerces National Park 188 Map 5: Strict Nature and Wildlife Reserve 189 Map 6: Usage Zoning, Los Alerces National Park 190 Map 7: Human Settlements and Infrastructure 191 Appendix 2: Species Lists Ap9n192 Appendix 2.1 List of Plant Species Recorded at PNLA 193 Appendix 2.2: List of Animal Species: Mammals 212 Appendix 2.3: List of Animal Species: Birds 214 Appendix 2.4: List of Animal Species: Reptiles 219 Appendix 2.5: List of Animal Species: Amphibians 220 Appendix 2.6: List of Animal Species: Fish 221 Appendix 2.7: List of Animal Species and Threat Status 222 Appendix 3: Law No. 19,292 Append228 Appendix 4: PNLA Management Plan Approval and Contents Appendi242 Appendix 5: Participative Process for Writing the Nomination Form Appendi252 Synthesis 252 Management Plan UpdateWorkshop 253 Annex A: Interview Guide 256 Annex B: Meetings and Interviews Held 257 Annex C: Self-Administered Survey 261 Annex D: ExternalWorkshop Participants 262 Annex E: Promotional Leaflet 264 Annex F: Interview Results Summary 267 Annex G: Survey Results Summary 272 Annex H: Esquel Declaration of Interest 274 Annex I: Trevelin Declaration of Interest 276 Annex J: Chubut Tourism Secretariat Declaration of Interest 278
    [Show full text]
  • A 2010 Supplement to Ducks, Geese, and Swans of the World
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Ducks, Geese, and Swans of the World by Paul A. Johnsgard Papers in the Biological Sciences 2010 The World’s Waterfowl in the 21st Century: A 2010 Supplement to Ducks, Geese, and Swans of the World Paul A. Johnsgard University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/biosciducksgeeseswans Part of the Ornithology Commons Johnsgard, Paul A., "The World’s Waterfowl in the 21st Century: A 2010 Supplement to Ducks, Geese, and Swans of the World" (2010). Ducks, Geese, and Swans of the World by Paul A. Johnsgard. 20. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/biosciducksgeeseswans/20 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Papers in the Biological Sciences at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Ducks, Geese, and Swans of the World by Paul A. Johnsgard by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. The World’s Waterfowl in the 21st Century: A 200 Supplement to Ducks, Geese, and Swans of the World Paul A. Johnsgard Pages xvii–xxiii: recent taxonomic changes, I have revised sev- Introduction to the Family Anatidae eral of the range maps to conform with more current information. For these updates I have Since the 978 publication of my Ducks, Geese relied largely on Kear (2005). and Swans of the World hundreds if not thou- Other important waterfowl books published sands of publications on the Anatidae have since 978 and covering the entire waterfowl appeared, making a comprehensive literature family include an identification guide to the supplement and text updating impossible.
    [Show full text]
  • Avian Monogamy
    (ISBN: 0-943610-45-1) AVIAN MONOGAMY EDITED BY PATRICIA ADAIR GOWATY AND DOUGLAS W. MOCK Department of Zoology University of Oklahoma Norman, Oklahoma 73019 ORNITHOLOGICAL MONOGRAPHS NO. 37 PUBLISHED BY THE AMERICAN ORNITHOLOGISTS' UNION WASHINGTON, D.C. 1985 AVIAN MONOGAMY ORNITHOLOGICAL MONOGRAPHS This series, published by the American Ornithologists' Union, has been estab- lished for major papers too long for inclusion in the Union's journal, The Auk. Publication has been made possiblethrough the generosityof the late Mrs. Carll Tucker and the Marcia Brady Tucker Foundation, Inc. Correspondenceconcerning manuscripts for publication in the seriesshould be addressedto the Editor, Dr. David W. Johnston,Department of Biology, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA 22030. Copies of Ornithological Monographs may be ordered from the Assistant to the Treasurer of the AOU, Frank R. Moore, Department of Biology, University of Southern Mississippi, Southern Station Box 5018, Hattiesburg, Mississippi 39406. (See price list on back and inside back covers.) OrnithologicalMonographs,No. 37, vi + 121 pp. Editors of Ornithological Monographs, Mercedes S. Foster and David W. Johnston Special Reviewers for this issue, Walter D. Koenig, Hastings Reservation, Star Route Box 80, Carmel Valley, CA 93924; Lewis W. Oring, De- partment of Biology,Box 8238, University Station, Grand Forks, ND 58202 Authors, Patricia Adair Gowaty, Department of BiologicalSciences, Clem- son University, Clemson, SC 29631; Douglas W. Mock, Department of Zoology, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73019 First received, 23 August 1983; accepted29 February 1984; final revision completed 8 October 1984 Issued October 17, 1985 Price $11.00 prepaid ($9.00 to AOU members). Library of CongressCatalogue Card Number 85-647080 Printed by the Allen Press,Inc., Lawrence, Kansas 66044 Copyright ¸ by the American Ornithologists'Union, 1985 ISBN: 0-943610-45-1 ii AVIAN MONOGAMY EDITED BY PATRICIA ADAIR GOWATY AND DOUGLAS W.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of the Status of Introduced Non-Native Waterbird Species in the Area of the African-Eurasian Waterbird Agreement: 2007 Update
    Secretariat provided by the Workshop 3 United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) Doc TC 8.25 21 February 2008 8th MEETING OF THE TECHNICAL COMMITTEE 03 - 05 March 2008, Bonn, Germany ___________________________________________________________________________ Review of the Status of Introduced Non-Native Waterbird Species in the Area of the African-Eurasian Waterbird Agreement: 2007 Update Authors A.N. Banks, L.J. Wright, I.M.D. Maclean, C. Hann & M.M. Rehfisch February 2008 Report of work carried out by the British Trust for Ornithology under contract to AEWA Secretariat © British Trust for Ornithology British Trust for Ornithology, The Nunnery, Thetford, Norfolk IP24 2PU Registered Charity No. 216652 CONTENTS Page No. List of Tables...........................................................................................................................................5 List of Figures.........................................................................................................................................7 List of Appendices ..................................................................................................................................9 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY..................................................................................................................11 RECOMMENDATIONS .....................................................................................................................13 1. INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................................15
    [Show full text]
  • Western Shore of Admiralty Bay, King George Island, South Shetland Islands
    Measure 4 (2014) Annex Management Plan for Antarctic Specially Protected Area No 128 WESTERN SHORE OF ADMIRALTY BAY, KING GEORGE ISLAND, SOUTH SHETLAND ISLANDS Introduction The Western Shore of Admiralty Bay is located on King George Island, South Shetland Islands, ~125 kilometers from the northern Antarctic Peninsula. Approximate area and coordinates: 16.8 km2 (centered at 58° 27' 40" W, 62° 11' 50" S). The Area is wholly terrestrial, and the primary reasons for designation are its diverse avian and mammalian fauna and locally rich vegetation, providing a representative sample of the maritime Antarctic ecosystem. Long term scientific research has been conducted on the animals within the Area. The Area is relatively accessible to nearby research stations and tourist ships regularly visit Admiralty Bay, and the ecological and scientific values of the area need protection from potential disturbance. The Area was originally designated as Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI) No. 8 in Recommendation X-5 (1979, SSSI No. 8) after a proposal by Poland. The SSSI designation was extended through Recommendation XII-5 (1983), Recommendation XIII-7 (1985) and Resolution 7 (1995). A revised Management Plan was adopted through Measure 1 (2000). The site was renamed and renumbered as Antarctic Specially Protected Area (ASPA) No 128 by Decision 1 (2002). The Area lies within Antarctic Specially Managed Area (ASMA) No. 1 Admiralty Bay, King George Island, South Shetland Islands, designated under Measure 2 (2006). The biological and scientific values of the Area are vulnerable to human disturbance (e.g. oversampling, disturbance to wildlife, introduction of non-native species). Therefore, it is important that human activities in the Area are managed to minimize the risk of impacts.
    [Show full text]
  • Print 01/03 January 2003
    A review of the status and identification of American Wigeon in Britain & Ireland Stephen C.Votier, Andrew H. J. Harrop and Matthew Denny John Wright ABSTRACT The numbers of American Wigeons Anas americana recorded in Britain & Ireland have increased significantly since the establishment of BBRC in 1958, and records ceased to be considered by the Committee from 1st January 2002.The status and distribution of the species is analysed here, and its identification discussed.Although male American Wigeon in breeding plumage is very distinctive, the identification of other plumages is much more problematic. ecords of American Wigeon Anas ameri- only were available). From 1st January 2002, cana, previously considered a rare records of American Wigeon ceased to be Rvagrant to Britain & Ireland from North assessed by BBRC, since the criteria for its America, have increased considerably since the removal from the list of species considered had mid 1980s, and there were 462 accepted records been met: more than 150 individuals had been by the end of 2001 (Rogers 2002; P. A. Fraser in recorded in the previous decade, with at least litt; note that Irish records until the end of 2000 ten in eight of those years. With this in mind, it 2 © British Birds 96 • January 2003 • 2-22 Status and identification of American Wigeon seems timely to document the status and distri- Status and distribution bution of the species, particularly given the American Wigeon breeds throughout northern problems of separating genuine vagrant wild- North America, from Alaska to Hudson Bay, fowl from escapes. In addition, although male and south through the Prairies to the eastern American Wigeon in breeding plumage is a rel- seaboard (Cramp & Simmons 1977; Madge & atively easy bird to identify, the identification of Burn 1988).
    [Show full text]
  • Broken Screens: the Regulation of Live Animal Imports in the United States
    Broken Screen S The Regulation of Live Animal Imports in the United States DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE Defenders of Wildlife is a national, nonprofit membership organization dedicated to the protection of all native wild animals and plants in their natural communities. PROJECT CONTRIBUTORS The Consortium for Conservation Medicine (CCM) is a collaborative institution linking Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Tufts University School of Veterinary Medicine Center for Conservation Medicine, The University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health, the University of Wisconsin-Madison Nelson Institute for Environmental Studies, the U.S. Geological Society National Wildlife Health Center and the Wildlife Trust. CCM strives to understand the links among human changes to the environment, the health of all species including humans, and the conservation of biodiversity. www.conservationmedicine.org The Invasive Species Specialist Group (ISSG) is part of the Species Survival Commission of The World Conservation Union (IUCN). The ISSG consist of about 150 scientific and policy experts on invasive species from more than 40 countries. The ISSG aims to reduce threats to natural ecosystems and the native species they contain by increasing awareness of invasive alien species, and of ways to prevent, control or eradicate them. www.issg.org ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Defenders of Wildlife Principal Author: Peter T. Jenkins Co-authors: Kristen Genovese, Heidi Ruffler Additional assistance: Carroll Muffett, Stas Burgiel, Kelly Malsch, Timm Kroeger, Mark Cheater, Robert Irvin and Gabriela Chavarria Researcher: David Tucker Editor: Kate Davies Art Director: Jen Lee Consortium for Conservation Medicine Principal Contributor: Katherine F. Smith Additional assistance: Peter Daszak and Lisa Schloegel IUCN Invasive Species Specialist Group Principal Contributor: Michael Browne Additional assistance: Shyama Pagad, UniServices Ltd.
    [Show full text]
  • Ducks, Geese, and Swans of the World by Paul A
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Ducks, Geese, and Swans of the World by Paul A. Johnsgard Papers in the Biological Sciences 2010 Ducks, Geese, and Swans of the World: Contents, Preface, & Introduction Paul A. Johnsgard University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/biosciducksgeeseswans Part of the Ornithology Commons Johnsgard, Paul A., "Ducks, Geese, and Swans of the World: Contents, Preface, & Introduction" (2010). Ducks, Geese, and Swans of the World by Paul A. Johnsgard. 2. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/biosciducksgeeseswans/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Papers in the Biological Sciences at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Ducks, Geese, and Swans of the World by Paul A. Johnsgard by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. DUCKS, GEESE, and SWANS of the World Paul A. Johnsgard Revised Edition Ducks, Geese, and Swans of the World By Paul A. Johnsgard The only one-volume comprehensive survey of the family Anatidae available in English, this book combines lavish illustration with the most recent information on the natural history, current distribution and status, and identification of all the species. After an introductory discussion of the ten tribes of Anatidae, separate accounts follow for each of the nearly 150 recognized species. These include scientific and vernacular names (in French, German, and Spanish as well as English), descrip- tions of the distribution of all recognized subspecies, selected weights and mea- surements, and identification criteria for both sexes and various age classes.
    [Show full text]
  • Falkland Islands Species List
    Falkland Islands Species List Day Common Name Scientific Name x 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 1 BIRDS* 2 DUCKS, GEESE, & WATERFOWL Anseriformes - Anatidae 3 Black-necked Swan Cygnus melancoryphus 4 Coscoroba Swan Coscoroba coscoroba 5 Upland Goose Chloephaga picta 6 Kelp Goose Chloephaga hybrida 7 Ruddy-headed Goose Chloephaga rubidiceps 8 Flying Steamer-Duck Tachyeres patachonicus 9 Falkland Steamer-Duck Tachyeres brachypterus 10 Crested Duck Lophonetta specularioides 11 Chiloe Wigeon Anas sibilatrix 12 Mallard Anas platyrhynchos 13 Cinnamon Teal Anas cyanoptera 14 Yellow-billed Pintail Anas georgica 15 Silver Teal Anas versicolor 16 Yellow-billed Teal Anas flavirostris 17 GREBES Podicipediformes - Podicipedidae 18 White-tufted Grebe Rollandia rolland 19 Silvery Grebe Podiceps occipitalis 20 PENGUINS Sphenisciformes - Spheniscidae 21 King Penguin Aptenodytes patagonicus 22 Gentoo Penguin Pygoscelis papua Cheesemans' Ecology Safaris Species List Updated: April 2017 Page 1 of 11 Day Common Name Scientific Name x 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 23 Magellanic Penguin Spheniscus magellanicus 24 Macaroni Penguin Eudyptes chrysolophus 25 Southern Rockhopper Penguin Eudyptes chrysocome chrysocome 26 ALBATROSSES Procellariiformes - Diomedeidae 27 Gray-headed Albatross Thalassarche chrysostoma 28 Black-browed Albatross Thalassarche melanophris 29 Royal Albatross (Southern) Diomedea epomophora epomophora 30 Royal Albatross (Northern) Diomedea epomophora sanfordi 31 Wandering Albatross (Snowy) Diomedea exulans exulans 32 Wandering
    [Show full text]
  • Waterfowl of North America: SURFACE-FEEDING DUCKS Tribe Anatini
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Waterfowl of North America, Revised Edition (2010) Papers in the Biological Sciences 2010 Waterfowl of North America: SURFACE-FEEDING DUCKS Tribe Anatini Paul A. Johnsgard University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/biosciwaterfowlna Part of the Ornithology Commons Johnsgard, Paul A., "Waterfowl of North America: SURFACE-FEEDING DUCKS Tribe Anatini" (2010). Waterfowl of North America, Revised Edition (2010). 11. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/biosciwaterfowlna/11 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Papers in the Biological Sciences at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Waterfowl of North America, Revised Edition (2010) by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. SURFACE-FEEDING DUCKS Tribe Anatini The surface-feeding, dabbling, or similarly described ducks are a group of about thirty-six species of mostly freshwater ducks that occur throughout the world. Many of them are temperate or arctic-breeding species that nest on dry land near freshwater ponds, marshes, rivers, or similar rather shallow bodies of water. Associated with this breeding habitat are their adaptations for foraging by "tipping-up" rather than by diving for food, an ability to land and take off abruptly from small water areas or land, and a moderately good walk­ ing ability but reduced perching capabilities as compared with perching ducks. Also unlike perching ducks, iridescent coloration on the wing is limited to the secondary feathers, or in rare cases is lacking altogether. The surface-feeding ducks are among the most abundant and familiar of all North American ducks and include such popular sporting species as mal­ lards, pintails, wigeons, and various teals.
    [Show full text]