DOCSLIB.ORG

Print 01/03 January 2003

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Print 01/03 January 2003 A review of the status and identification of American Wigeon in Britain & Ireland Stephen C.Votier, Andrew H. J. Harrop and Matthew Denny John Wright ABSTRACT The numbers of American Wigeons Anas americana recorded in Britain & Ireland have increased significantly since the establishment of BBRC in 1958, and records ceased to be considered by the Committee from 1st January 2002.The status and distribution of the species is analysed here, and its identification discussed.Although male American Wigeon in breeding plumage is very distinctive, the identification of other plumages is much more problematic. ecords of American Wigeon Anas ameri- only were available). From 1st January 2002, cana, previously considered a rare records of American Wigeon ceased to be Rvagrant to Britain & Ireland from North assessed by BBRC, since the criteria for its America, have increased considerably since the removal from the list of species considered had mid 1980s, and there were 462 accepted records been met: more than 150 individuals had been by the end of 2001 (Rogers 2002; P. A. Fraser in recorded in the previous decade, with at least litt; note that Irish records until the end of 2000 ten in eight of those years. With this in mind, it 2 © British Birds 96 • January 2003 • 2-22 Status and identification of American Wigeon seems timely to document the status and distri- Status and distribution bution of the species, particularly given the American Wigeon breeds throughout northern problems of separating genuine vagrant wild- North America, from Alaska to Hudson Bay, fowl from escapes. In addition, although male and south through the Prairies to the eastern American Wigeon in breeding plumage is a rel- seaboard (Cramp & Simmons 1977; Madge & atively easy bird to identify, the identification of Burn 1988). The majority of the population are females and non-adult males has only recently highly migratory, wintering across the southern been approached in a rigorous manner which United States and Mexico, through the befits their subtlety (Harrop 1994a). Further- Caribbean and into Central America and more, frequent hybridisation between American northern South America (Madge & Burn 1988; Wigeon and Eurasian Wigeon A. penelope,or Ogilvie & Young 1998). One of the most Eurasian Wigeon and Chiloe Wigeon A. sibila- numerous dabbling ducks in North America, its trix, as well as of American and Eurasian breeding population has oscillated around the Wigeon with other species of ducks in the genus long-term average of 2.8 million birds, although Anas, can produce extremely variable hybrids the population increased from a 40-year low of (Carey 1993; Harrop 1994b; Jiguet 1999), pro- 1.8 million in 1987 to over 3 million in 1998 viding major identification pitfalls. (Ducks Unlimited www.ducks.org). In this paper we review all the accepted American Wigeon is a rare, but regular, records of American Wigeon in Britain & visitor to Europe. Combining data requested Ireland since the formation of BBRC in 1958, from the Association of European Rarities presenting data on annual totals, timing and Committees (AERC) with information from distribution of records, as well as age and sex Lewington et al. (1991), we have established its composition. We also present a distillation of status in Europe as follows. There have been current identification criteria based on a com- regular records in Iceland (112, up to and bination of our own observations, published including 1999); Finland (38, up to 2000); the material and BBRC files. The aim of this review Netherlands (35, up to 2001); France (31, up to is to provide a clear picture of the status and 2000); Spain (18 accepted records up to 2000, occurrence of one of the most regularly occur- involving 27 individuals); Belgium (14, all ring North American vagrants to Europe and, 1986-2000); Sweden (12); Norway (11, up to with its removal from the BBRC list, to provide 2000); Azores (9); Channel Islands (3); local and county records committees with a Germany (12) and Denmark (n/a). The convenient reference to help them assess future majority of European records, however, are records of this species. from Britain & Ireland. 35 30 25 20 15 10 No. individuals new 5 0 1958 1961 1964 1967 1970 1973 1976 1979 1982 1985 1988 1991 1994 1997 2000 Fig. 1. Numbers of newly arrived American Wigeons Anas americana in Britain & Ireland, 1958-2001. 2 The increase in numbers is statistically significant (linear regression: r =0.67, F1,42=87.0, p<0.001). British Birds 96 • January 2003 • 2-22 3 Status and identification of American Wigeon Table 1. Flock size and composition of groups of problem of double-counting. Certain individ- more than two American Wigeons Anas uals have returned to the same location for americana in Britain & Ireland, 1958-2001. several consecutive winters, and this high site fidelity may reduce the likelihood of between- males females total flock size site duplication. Co. Cork 1986 3 - 3 The majority of records constitute single Co. Cork 1996 3 - 3 birds associating with flocks of Eurasian Fife 1989 2 1 3 Wigeon; all American Wigeons which returned Orkney 1995 2 1 3 to the same sites in consecutive winters were Berkshire 1985 2 2 4 associating with Eurasian Wigeons. Several Cornwall 1981 4 1 5 American Wigeons appear to have formed inter- Shetland 2000 6 4 10 specific pair bonds with their Eurasian counter- Co. Kerry 1968 >2 >2 13 parts, and there have also been at least 13 pure pairs of Americans, as well as six records of two males together. A number of larger flocks have Status in Britain & Ireland been seen (table 1), the most notable being Prior to 1958, there were just 22 records of flocks of 13 in Co. Kerry in October 1968 and American Wigeon in Britain & Ireland, but ten in Shetland in October 2000. between 1958 and 2001 there was a total of 440 The significantly higher numbers of Amer- accepted records. During this period, the ican Wigeons recorded in Britain & Ireland in number of new birds recorded each year recent years may be attributed to a number of showed a steady, consistent (and statistically sig- different factors. Given the increasing numbers nificant) increase (fig. 1). The only marked of observers and the increasingly sophisticated deviations from the trend were in 1968, when nature of modern birdwatchers, it is clear that 16 new arrivals were reported (including a more and more rarities (of many species) are single flock of 13 individuals in Co. Kerry), and now being found and identified in Britain & in 1993 when only six new birds were recorded. Ireland. All things being equal, the numbers of Although it is possible that a number of records American Wigeons found are likely to increase may relate to the same wandering individuals, accordingly. It might be speculated that records local observers, recorders and BBRC have have increased because observers are now able attempted, wherever possible, to eliminate the to identify the more subtle female and imma- 7 6 5 4 3 No. individuals new 2 1 0 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 Fig. 2. Accepted records of new female and unsexed immature American Wigeons 2 Anas americana in Britain & Ireland, 1958-2001 (linear regression: r =0.29, F1,42=16.86, p<0.001). 4 British Birds 96 • January 2003 • 2-22 Status and identification of American Wigeon ture plumages, since the number of accepted records of females and 120 immatures increased significantly between 1958 and 2001 (fig. 2). 100 Nonetheless, females and immatures are still relatively scarce, and cannot really explain the overall increase in 80 records (fig. 1). While the North American population has fluctuated 60 considerably in the past 50 years, there has been a steady increase since the mid 1980s. The number of 40 British and Irish records does not, however, correlate with the North 20 American population estimates1.It seems that vagrancy patterns are 0 influenced by many factors, which cannot be easily separated. JJASONDJFMAM Distribution and timing Fig. 3. Arrival dates of American Wigeons Anas americana in Britain American Wigeons have been & Ireland, 1958-2001 (presumed returning birds are excluded).The greatest numbers arrive in October and November, although there recorded in a total of 77 counties or also appears to be a pronounced passage during spring. recording areas in Britain & Ireland, with records from 76 counties/areas between that most new arrivals in autumn occur on 1958 and 2001 (Appendix 1). There is a broad western and northern coasts. This pattern fits in spread of records, with the greatest numbers in well with the typical arrival dates and locations Ireland and the Northern Isles, but also with of most North American vagrants (Cottridge & relatively large numbers in counties with both Vinicombe 1996). In addition, while many high levels of observer coverage and sizeable American Wigeons do occur with flocks of wintering populations of Eurasian Wigeon. Eurasian Wigeons, the majority of Britain & Twelve counties have recorded American Ireland’s wintering population of the latter Wigeon on ten or more occasions: Shetland species arrive later in the winter (fig. 5). Winter (30), Co. Cork (25), Co. Kerry (25), Cornwall records are more widely spread, with no clear (17), Norfolk (16), Orkney (16), Cheshire (14), geographical pattern, but once again a close Lancashire & North Merseyside (14), Northeast association with wintering Eurasian Wigeons is Scotland (13), Dorset (12), Co. Wexford (12) apparent. Spring passage seems to show a bias and Cleveland (11). towards counties bordering the North Sea, as The greatest numbers of American Wigeons well as the Northern Isles. This trend, that of appear in October and November (fig. 3).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Earliest Interior Occurrence of Eurasian Wigeon (Anas Penelope) in British Columbia
    Wildlife Afield 10(1):38-39, 2013 © Biodiversity Centre for Wildlife Studies Earliest Interior Occurrence of Eurasian Wigeon (Anas penelope) in British Columbia R. Wayne Campbell1 and Glenn R. Ryder2 12511 Kilgary Place, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada V8N 1J6 22302 ‒ 2888 273rd Street, Aldergrove, British Columbia, Canada V4W 3M6 From the late 19th century through the mid-20th through 9 January 1946 (Munro and Cowan 1947). century, Eurasian Wigeon (Anas penelope; Figure The species was reported during this period between 9 1) was considered an “Occasional visitant to coast January and 30 March (10 records) and on 30 October waters” (Brooks and Swarth 1925:32), becoming and 5 December. Ten of the records (75%) occurred a “Regular winter visitant to the coast” of British in January and February (Munro and Cowan 1947), Columbia (Munro and Cowan 1947:63). The latter the height of the winter season. Surprisingly, most status was based on 12 records of males collected occurrences were from southeastern Vancouver Island or sighted during the 48-year period from the first (75%) and not the adjacent southwest mainland coast provincial record in February 1898 (Kermode 1904) where huge flocks of American Wigeon (A. americana) Figure 1. Almost all records of Eurasian Wigeon in British Columbia are of males, as the females of this and the congeneric American Wigeon are difficult to separate in the field. One of the earliest provincial records was from Esquimalt Lagoon on 25 February 1934 where this male was photographed there 71 years later on 19 February 2005. Photo by Mark Nyhof 10:1 June 2013 38 overwinter (Campbell et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Lista Roja De Las Aves Del Uruguay 1
    Lista Roja de las Aves del Uruguay 1 Lista Roja de las Aves del Uruguay Una evaluación del estado de conservación de la avifauna nacional con base en los criterios de la Unión Internacional para la Conservación de la Naturaleza. Adrián B. Azpiroz, Laboratorio de Genética de la Conservación, Instituto de Investigaciones Biológicas Clemente Estable, Av. Italia 3318 (CP 11600), Montevideo ([email protected]). Matilde Alfaro, Asociación Averaves & Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de la República, Iguá 4225 (CP 11400), Montevideo ([email protected]). Sebastián Jiménez, Proyecto Albatros y Petreles-Uruguay, Centro de Investigación y Conservación Marina (CICMAR), Avenida Giannattasio Km 30.5. (CP 15008) Canelones, Uruguay; Laboratorio de Recursos Pelágicos, Dirección Nacional de Recursos Acuáticos, Constituyente 1497 (CP 11200), Montevideo ([email protected]). Cita sugerida: Azpiroz, A.B., M. Alfaro y S. Jiménez. 2012. Lista Roja de las Aves del Uruguay. Una evaluación del estado de conservación de la avifauna nacional con base en los criterios de la Unión Internacional para la Conservación de la Naturaleza. Dirección Nacional de Medio Ambiente, Montevideo. Descargo de responsabilidad El contenido de esta publicación es responsabilidad de los autores y no refleja necesariamente las opiniones o políticas de la DINAMA ni de las organizaciones auspiciantes y no comprometen a estas instituciones. Las denominaciones empleadas y la forma en que aparecen los datos no implica de parte de DINAMA, ni de las organizaciones auspiciantes o de los autores, juicio alguno sobre la condición jurídica de países, territorios, ciudades, personas, organizaciones, zonas o de sus autoridades, ni sobre la delimitación de sus fronteras o límites.
    [Show full text]
  • Courtship of Ducklings by Adult Male Chiloe Wigeon (Anas Sibilatrix)
    October 1991] ShortCommunications 969 Natural Environment ResearchCouncil grant GR3/ LINDEN, M., & A. P. MOLLERß 1989ß Cost of repro- 7249. duction and covariation of life history traits in birds. Trends Ecol. Evol. 4: 367-371. LITERATURE CITED NUR, N. 1984. The consequencesof brood size for breeding Blue Tits I. Adult survival, weight ASKENIVIO,C. 1979. Reproductiverate and the return change and the cost of reproduction. J. Anim. rate of male Pied Flycatchers.Am. Nat. 114:748- Ecol. 53: 479-496ß 753. 1988a. The consequencesof brood size for COHEN,J. 1988. Statistical power analysis for the breeding Blue Tits III. Measuring the cost of re- behavioral sciences,second ed. New Jersey,Law- production: survival, future fecundity and dif- rence Erlbaum Assoc. ferential dispersalßEvolution 42: 351-362ß DESTEvEN,D. 1980. Clutch size, breeding success ß 1988b. The costof reproduction in birds: an and parental survival in the Tree Sparrow (Iri- examination of the evidenceß Ardea 76: 155-168. doprocnebicolor). Evolution 34: 278-291. --. 1990. The costof reproduction in birds, eval- DIJKSTRA,C., A. BULT, S. BIJLSMA,S. D^AN, T. MEIJER, uating the evidence from manipulative and non- • g. ZIJLSTRA.1990. Brood size manipulations manipulative studies. In Population biology of in the Kestrel (Falco tinnunculus):effects on off- passerinebirds, an integratedapproach (J. Blon- spring and parent survival. J.Anim. Ecol.59: 269- del, A. Gosler,J. D. Lebreton,and R. McCleery, 285. Eds.).Berlin, Springer-VerlagPressß FLEISS,J. L. 1981. Statistical methods for rates and ORELL,M., & K. KOIVULA. 1988. Costof reproduction: proportions, second ed. New York, J. Wiley and parental survival and production of recruits in Sons.
    [Show full text]
  • Information Sheet on Ramsar Wetlands (RIS)
    Information Sheet on Ramsar Wetlands (RIS) Categories approved by Recommendation 4.7 (1990), as amended by Resolution VIII.13 of the 8th Conference of the Contracting Parties (2002) and Resolutions IX.1 Annex B, IX.6, IX.21 and IX. 22 of the 9th Conference of the Contracting Parties (2005). Notes for compilers: 1. The RIS should be completed in accordance with the attached Explanatory Notes and Guidelines for completing the Information Sheet on Ramsar Wetlands. Compilers are strongly advised to read this guidance before filling in the RIS. 2. Further information and guidance in support of Ramsar site designations are provided in the Strategic Framework for the future development of the List of Wetlands of International Importance (Ramsar Wise Use Handbook 7, 2nd edition, as amended by COP9 Resolution IX.1 Annex B). A 3rd edition of the Handbook, incorporating these amendments, is in preparation and will be available in 2006. 3. Once completed, the RIS (and accompanying map(s)) should be submitted to the Ramsar Secretariat. Compilers should provide an electronic (MS Word) copy of the RIS and, where possible, digital copies of all maps. 1. Name and address of the compiler of this form: FOR OFFICE USE ONLY. DD MM YY Joint Nature Conservation Committee Monkstone House City Road Designation date Site Reference Number Peterborough Cambridgeshire PE1 1JY UK Telephone/Fax: +44 (0)1733 – 562 626 / +44 (0)1733 – 555 948 Email: [email protected] 2. Date this sheet was completed/updated: Designated: 28 November 1985 3. Country: UK (England) 4. Name of the Ramsar site: Martin Mere 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Disaggregation of Bird Families Listed on Cms Appendix Ii
    Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals 2nd Meeting of the Sessional Committee of the CMS Scientific Council (ScC-SC2) Bonn, Germany, 10 – 14 July 2017 UNEP/CMS/ScC-SC2/Inf.3 DISAGGREGATION OF BIRD FAMILIES LISTED ON CMS APPENDIX II (Prepared by the Appointed Councillors for Birds) Summary: The first meeting of the Sessional Committee of the Scientific Council identified the adoption of a new standard reference for avian taxonomy as an opportunity to disaggregate the higher-level taxa listed on Appendix II and to identify those that are considered to be migratory species and that have an unfavourable conservation status. The current paper presents an initial analysis of the higher-level disaggregation using the Handbook of the Birds of the World/BirdLife International Illustrated Checklist of the Birds of the World Volumes 1 and 2 taxonomy, and identifies the challenges in completing the analysis to identify all of the migratory species and the corresponding Range States. The document has been prepared by the COP Appointed Scientific Councilors for Birds. This is a supplementary paper to COP document UNEP/CMS/COP12/Doc.25.3 on Taxonomy and Nomenclature UNEP/CMS/ScC-Sc2/Inf.3 DISAGGREGATION OF BIRD FAMILIES LISTED ON CMS APPENDIX II 1. Through Resolution 11.19, the Conference of Parties adopted as the standard reference for bird taxonomy and nomenclature for Non-Passerine species the Handbook of the Birds of the World/BirdLife International Illustrated Checklist of the Birds of the World, Volume 1: Non-Passerines, by Josep del Hoyo and Nigel J. Collar (2014); 2.
    [Show full text]
  • A 2010 Supplement to Ducks, Geese, and Swans of the World
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Ducks, Geese, and Swans of the World by Paul A. Johnsgard Papers in the Biological Sciences 2010 The World’s Waterfowl in the 21st Century: A 2010 Supplement to Ducks, Geese, and Swans of the World Paul A. Johnsgard University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/biosciducksgeeseswans Part of the Ornithology Commons Johnsgard, Paul A., "The World’s Waterfowl in the 21st Century: A 2010 Supplement to Ducks, Geese, and Swans of the World" (2010). Ducks, Geese, and Swans of the World by Paul A. Johnsgard. 20. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/biosciducksgeeseswans/20 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Papers in the Biological Sciences at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Ducks, Geese, and Swans of the World by Paul A. Johnsgard by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. The World’s Waterfowl in the 21st Century: A 200 Supplement to Ducks, Geese, and Swans of the World Paul A. Johnsgard Pages xvii–xxiii: recent taxonomic changes, I have revised sev- Introduction to the Family Anatidae eral of the range maps to conform with more current information. For these updates I have Since the 978 publication of my Ducks, Geese relied largely on Kear (2005). and Swans of the World hundreds if not thou- Other important waterfowl books published sands of publications on the Anatidae have since 978 and covering the entire waterfowl appeared, making a comprehensive literature family include an identification guide to the supplement and text updating impossible.
    [Show full text]
  • Rapid Risk Assessment on Incursion of HPAI H5N8 Into Housed Or Not Housed Poultry Flocks and Captive Birds
    Rapid risk assessment on incursion of HPAI H5N8 into housed or not housed poultry flocks and captive birds 29 January 2021 Situation as at 26 January 2021 © Crown copyright 2021 You may re-use this information (excluding logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence v.3. To view this licence visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3/ or email [email protected] This publication is available at www.gov.uk/government/publications Any enquiries regarding this publication should be sent to: [email protected] www.gov.uk/defra 2 Contents Summary ............................................................................................................................................. 4 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................ 6 Hazard Identification ......................................................................................................................... 10 Previous outbreaks of HPAI H5N8: ................................................................................................... 12 Current Situation ............................................................................................................................... 12 Risk Question .................................................................................................................................... 16 Risk Levels ....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Red-Breasted Goose
    Urgent preliminary assessment of ornithological data relevant to spread of Avian Influenza in Europe Ward Hagemeijer Wetlands International Commissioned by DG Environment to Wetlands International and Euring Data needs for risk assessment: ornithology (virology) Quantified risk assessment: Research and Monitoring programme A. Birds as a vector 1.Quantified bird migration information: satellite telemetry, ringing data analysis, count data analysis 2.Quantified frequency of occurrence of virus in wild birds: surveillance 3.Ecology of virus in wild birds: virological research on wild birds B. Impact on wild bird populations Different components of the project Activities to be undertaken: • identification of Higher Risk Species (HRS) • analysis of their migration routes (ringing and count data) • identification of concentration and mixing sites • rapid assessment planning for wetland sites Analysis of higher risk species Identification of HRS on basis of: • occurence of LPAI viruses • ecology and behaviour • contact risk with poultry • numbers within EU In collaboration with David Stroud and Rowena Langston Occurrence of LPAI in wild birds species Results 1999 – 2004 Erasmus University Netherlands Species N Tested N PCR+ (%) N Egg + Mallard 6822 489 (7.2) 267 Eurasian Wigeon 1470 22 (1.5) 4 Common Teal 670 18 (2.7) 4 Northern Pintail 135 4 (3.0) 1 Northern Shoveler 90 1 (1.1) 1 Shelduck, Eider, Gadwall, Tufted, Garganey 238 0 (0.0) 0 Greater White-fronted Goose 1696 19 (1.1) 5 Greylag Goose 303 8 (2.6) 4 Brent, Barnacle, Bean, Egyptian, Canada, Pink-f 1202 0 (0.0) 0 Black-headed Gull 993 10 (1.0) 6 Common, Herring, Black-backed, Kittiwake 1976 0 (0.0) 0 Guillemot 698 3 (0.4) 1 Other birds 10909 0 0 + + + 27204 574 (2.1) 295 Selection of taxonomic groups • Anseriformes and Charadriiformes, • Migratory • Occurring in Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • Waterfowl Management in Georgia
    WATERFOWL MANAGEMENT IN GEORGIA PREFACE & ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Wildlife biologists serving on the Georgia Department of Natural Resources' Waterfowl Committee prepared the information found here. It is intended to serve as a source of general information for those with a casual interest in waterfowl. It also serves as a more detailed guide for landowners and managers who want to improve the waterfowl habitat on their property. The committee hopes this information will serve to benefit the waterfowl resource in Georgia and help to ensure its well- being for generations to come. Land management assistance is available from Wildlife Resources Division biologists. For additional help, contact the nearest Game Management Section office. Game Management Offices Region I Armuchee (706) 295-6041 Region II Gainesville (770) 535-5700 Region III Thomson (706) 595-4222 Region III Thomson (Augusta) (706) 667-4672 Region IV Fort Valley (478) 825-6354 Region V Albany (229) 430-4254 Region VI Fitzgerald (229) 426-5267 Region VII Brunswick (912) 262-3173 * Headquarters (770) 918-6416 We would like to express our appreciation to Carroll Allen and Dan Forster of the Georgia Department of Natural Resources for providing editorial comments. AUTHORS: Greg Balkcom, Senior Wildlife Biologist Ted Touchstone, Wildlife Biologist Kent Kammermeyer, Senior Wildlife Biologist Vic Vansant, Regional Wildlife Supervisor Carmen Martin, Wildlife Biologist Mike Van Brackle, Wildlife Biologist George Steele, Wildlife Biologist John Bowers, Senior Wildlife Biologist The Department of Natural Resources is an equal opportunity employer and offers all persons the opportunity to compete and participate in areas of employment regardless of race, color, religion, national origin, handicap, or other non-merit factors.
    [Show full text]
  • Europe's Huntable Birds a Review of Status and Conservation Priorities
    FACE - EUROPEAN FEDERATIONEurope’s FOR Huntable HUNTING Birds A Review AND CONSERVATIONof Status and Conservation Priorities Europe’s Huntable Birds A Review of Status and Conservation Priorities December 2020 1 European Federation for Hunting and Conservation (FACE) Established in 1977, FACE represents the interests of Europe’s 7 million hunters, as an international non-profit-making non-governmental organisation. Its members are comprised of the national hunters’ associations from 37 European countries including the EU-27. FACE upholds the principle of sustainable use and in this regard its members have a deep interest in the conservation and improvement of the quality of the European environment. See: www.face.eu Reference Sibille S., Griffin, C. and Scallan, D. (2020) Europe’s Huntable Birds: A Review of Status and Conservation Priorities. European Federation for Hunting and Conservation (FACE). https://www.face.eu/ 2 Europe’s Huntable Birds A Review of Status and Conservation Priorities Executive summary Context Non-Annex species show the highest proportion of ‘secure’ status and the lowest of ‘threatened’ status. Taking all wild birds into account, The EU State of Nature report (2020) provides results of the national the situation has deteriorated from the 2008-2012 to the 2013-2018 reporting under the Birds and Habitats directives (2013 to 2018), and a assessments. wider assessment of Europe’s biodiversity. For FACE, the findings are of key importance as they provide a timely health check on the status of In the State of Nature report (2020), ‘agriculture’ is the most frequently huntable birds listed in Annex II of the Birds Directive.
    [Show full text]
  • THE FAMILY ANATIDAE 43 Ernst Map
    March 1945 42 THE WILSON BULLETIN Vol. 57, No. 1 Biziura L lob&, Australian Musk Duck Aberrant Species Thalassornis leuconota, African White-backed Duck Heteronetta atricapilla, Black-headed Duck 7. TRIBE MERGANETTINI. TORRENTDUCKS Merganetta armuta, Torrent Duck GENERA RECOGNIZEDBY PETERS AND SYNONYMIZEDIHERE Arctonetta= Som&eria Metopiana= Netta Asarcornis = Cairina Nesochen= Branta Casarca = Tadorna Nesonetta= Anus Chaulelasmus= Anas Nomonyx = Oxyura Chen = Anser Nyroca= Aythya Cheniscus= Nettapus Oidemia = Melanitta Chenopis= Cygnus Phil&e= Anser Cygnopsis= Anser Polysticta= Somateria Dendronessa= Aix Pseudotadorna= Tadorna Eulabeia= Anser Pteronetta= Cairina Lophodytes= Mergus Salvadorina= Anus Mareca= Anas Spatula= Anas Mergellus = Mergus GENERA RECOGNIZEDHERE BUT NOT BY PETERS Amazonetta von Boetticher (for Anus brasiliensis) Lophonetta Riley (for Anus specularioides) COMPARISONOP CHARACTERS Our studies have shown that the waterfowl can be divided into about nine groups that are fairly well defined both morphologically and biologically. In addition, there are a number of species and genera that are either intermediate between the otherwise well- defined tribes (e.g. Coscoroba) or too poorly known for a safe classi- fication (e.g. Anus specularis, Anus leucophrys, Malacorhynchus, Tachyeres) ; others show peculiarities or a combination of characters that prevent them from fitting well into any of the existing groups. Such genera as the Australian Cereopsis, Anseranas, Stictonetta, and Chenonetta could either be made the sole representatives of so many separate tribes or each could be included in the tribe with which it shares the greatest number of similarities. For the sake of con- venience we have adopted the latter course, but without forgetting that these genera are not typical representatives of the tribes with which we associate them.
    [Show full text]
  • Waterfowl in Iowa, Overview
    STATE OF IOWA 1977 WATERFOWL IN IOWA By JACK W MUSGROVE Director DIVISION OF MUSEUM AND ARCHIVES STATE HISTORICAL DEPARTMENT and MARY R MUSGROVE Illustrated by MAYNARD F REECE Printed for STATE CONSERVATION COMMISSION DES MOINES, IOWA Copyright 1943 Copyright 1947 Copyright 1953 Copyright 1961 Copyright 1977 Published by the STATE OF IOWA Des Moines Fifth Edition FOREWORD Since the origin of man the migratory flight of waterfowl has fired his imagination. Undoubtedly the hungry caveman, as he watched wave after wave of ducks and geese pass overhead, felt a thrill, and his dull brain questioned, “Whither and why?” The same age - old attraction each spring and fall turns thousands of faces skyward when flocks of Canada geese fly over. In historic times Iowa was the nesting ground of countless flocks of ducks, geese, and swans. Much of the marshland that was their home has been tiled and has disappeared under the corn planter. However, this state is still the summer home of many species, and restoration of various areas is annually increasing the number. Iowa is more important as a cafeteria for the ducks on their semiannual flights than as a nesting ground, and multitudes of them stop in this state to feed and grow fat on waste grain. The interest in waterfowl may be observed each spring during the blue and snow goose flight along the Missouri River, where thousands of spectators gather to watch the flight. There are many bird study clubs in the state with large memberships, as well as hundreds of unaffiliated ornithologists who spend much of their leisure time observing birds.
    [Show full text]