University Rankings 2021

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

University Rankings 2021 2021 QS Quacquarelli Symonds WORLD UNIVERSITY RANKINGS 2021 Welcome On behalf of all at QS, we are delighted to introduce the 17th edition of the QS World University Rankings (WUR). This year marks 16 years of the world’s most consulted university rankings. The 2021 edition is, however, a particularly poignant one – a reflection of the higher education sector before the global pandemic. We know this pandemic will have painful and wide-reaching effects on our sector and the uncertainty faced by students and institutions alike will be keenly felt. The research intensity of The record-breaking figures for internationalization metrics and faculty recent years may be diffi- student ratio may not be seen again for some years to come. The cult to sustain under the research intensity of recent years may be difficult to sustain under the financial pressure now financial pressure now weighing on institutions. In short, the 2021 WUR weighing on institutions. will likely be a resetting of the trajectory of rankings, looked on in future both as a reminder of the good times and a setpoint to reach for once more. These rankings are, whilst useful for faculty, administrators and policy makers, designed with students at their heart. Now more so than ever, the weight of uncertainty faced by students on where to place their time, effort and money for a world-class education is palpable. With campuses closed, learning ported online and time differences almost an anachronism, the need for objective guidance and independent insights remains strong. Choosing where to study is a complicated and highly personal endeavor, and we hope to play our part in making this decision easier. Dr. Drew MacFarlane Rankings Manager, QS Quacquarelli Symonds 1 Journal ASU 2.indd 1 18.02.2020 04:36 WORLD UNIVERSITY RANKINGS 2021 New decade, different times Anton John Crace Editor, QS Quacquarelli Symonds The 2021 QS World University institutions improved over Rankings (WUR) come at Stable and 100 spots to move up two a difficult time for higher variable bands, with Sofia University education globally. They in Bulgaria entering the 601- The 17th edition of the WUR were, in part, meant to not 650 rank band, and Savitribai features over 1,000 higher only celebrate the higher Phule Pune University in India education providers from education sector, but also entering the 651-700 rank around the world. The three QS Quacquarelli Symonds’ band. highest ranked institutions 30th anniversary. The past have again remained the An even 80 locations also three decades have seen QS same, with Massachusetts featured in the 2021 WUR, evolve significantly, and the Institute of Technology (MIT), and the US and UK again 2021 Rankings, the first to be Stanford University, and hosted the greatest number released in the new decade, Harvard University, all US- were meant to be a time to based, taking out top spots. reflect on how we’ve changed and how the sector has The top 100 remained changed. relatively stable with only small variances from the 2020 Instead, with the COVID-19 WUR. Two institutions, Yonsei pandemic creating significant University in South Korea and barriers for international Mexico-based Universidad mobility and collaboration, Nacional Autónoma de notwithstanding limiting México (UNAM), entered the the ability for universities top 100, ranking 85th and to engage in their regular 100th, respectively. In total, activities, the 2021 WUR may only 10 universities in the become a unique artifact of top 100 shifted 10 spots or this time. While they provide more, the largest being Yonsei insight into institutional University, which improved 19 excellence for educators, places. policymakers and prospective students, the 2021 WUR could It was outside the top 100, become much more. however, that the greatest proportion of changes occurred. There were 47 new additions to the rankings this year. Meanwhile, two 3 WORLD UNIVERSITY RANKINGS 2021 Creative Minds Transform the world of universities, with the Ratio, provide a more holistic The 2021 WUR may therefore former boasting 153 ranked picture of a university. highlight an area of concern institutions, and the latter for Australia and the UK, Coupling the metrics with the 88. China continued its rise which have seen institutions findings of the QS International in the ranks, with just over 50 in both countries lose Student Survey (ISS), which universities. ground within the Employer gauges the thoughts and Reputation field. The UK has perspectives of prospective been significantly affected international students, can Employability in this area, however, there assist universities to align are many potential reasons matters their offering against student for this, and the change does Outside the overall ranks, needs. not necessarily reflect either the 2021 WUR also highlight One example from the ISS is country worsening, but others areas an institution may the consistently high value improving. Thailand and need to focus on to attract students put on employment Malaysia stand out, enhancing students. The 6 metrics used outcomes, leading it to performance not only for to determine a institution’s become one of the most Employer but also Academic rank, those being Academic important factors when Reputation. Reputation, Employer choosing a course. In the 2020 Reputation, Faculty/Student It is also worth noting 2019 ISS, respondents placed a Ratio, Citations per faculty, was a watershed moment for course leading to their chosen International Faculty Ratio, post-study work right (PSWR) career over personal interest and International Student policies. The UK reintroduced in its subject. PSWR after sustained Al Khobar, Eastern Province, Saudi Arabia www.pmu.edu.sa PMU_KSA 4 WORLD UNIVERSITY RANKINGS 2021 campaigning from peak As competition continues to students, and many bodies and representative increase between countries governments are trying to find groups, while the Australian and higher education meaningful solutions for its Government, in a bid to institutions, the measurement resumption. Consequently, the entice international students indicators further illustrate pandemic does not influence into non-metropolitan and the biggest opportunities the 2021 rankings but will regional areas, tweaked their to strengthen a university’s likely have an impact from the scheme to provide bonus proposition to students. 2022 cycle onwards. years depending on location The extent of COVID-19’s of study and work. COVID-19 influence on the WUR is The impact of top-level difficult to predict. While The surveys upon which the government policy on the there is an argument the 2021 WUR are based were rankings’ indicators, however, pandemic could potentially conducted and completed is unclear, and the influence of weaken international student prior to the full onset of changes to PSWR, for example, and faculty ratios, which the COVID-19 pandemic, a will only occur over time. It is are collectively weighted 10 period in which it was unclear clear, however, the actions of percent within the rankings, whether in-person education individuation universities have universities are also research delivery would continue. Many the biggest effect on rankings, institutions. Potentially, the reports also indicate there is and in terms of graduate highly publicized research still a level of uncertainty over employment, reports continue output of many previously whether in-person delivery to indicate employers remain lesser known universities will occur at all in 2020, either largely unaware of PSWR. could strengthen Academic for domestic or international 6 93 1,002 27 47 WORLD UNIVERSITY RANKINGS 2021 LOCATIONS INSTITUTIONS SPECIALISTS NEW COVERED PUBLISHED CONSIDERED ENTRANTS Reputation, and increased collaboration, with the desire DISTRIBUTION BY REGION PROPORTION OF INSTITUTIONS BY REGION BY RANGE to work towards global benefit, may strengthen citations. The areas QS’ Rankings do 7.0% Europe 408 not directly cover are also 10.8% 39.8% equally important, and the QS ongoing ISS on perceptions of World 15.6% Asia Pacific 277 COVID-19 similarly highlights University areas where universities Rankings 2021 should focus. Online delivery, clear communication, and US & Canada 177 flexible commencement 26.7% Latin America 80 dates are just a few areas Middle East & Africa 60 prospective students have 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 - - - - - - - - indicated interest. Many of - 1 - 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 these, however, will have 1 9 secondary influence on rankings. The 2021 WUR is in many NEW ENTRANTS BY REGION ways a snapshot of higher EDITION SUMMARY education immediately prior East Asia 11 to a global pandemic. It is Europe (408) is the region with the largest a moment, frozen in time, Eastern Europe 11 number of institutions featuring in the 2021 of a pre-COVID-19 world. QS World University Rankings, representing This ranking, more so than 39.8% of all the institutions considered. many others, may become Southern Europe 7 Asia-Pacific follows with 277 (26.7%) and US the benchmark upon which & Canada with 177 (15.6%). to reflect and consider how Latin America 6 higher education recovers over the coming years. Middle East 5 NEW ENTRANTS In the 2021 edition, a total of 47 institutions Western Europe 5 made their first appearance in the rankings. East Asia and Eastern Europe both provided Central Asia 1 the largest numbers with 11 new entrants. South Asia 1 9 8 2021 an 2020 Rank Location Sie Focus Res. Age Status Academic Reputation Reputation Employer Faculty Student Citations per Faculty nternational Faculty nternational Students Oerall nstitution 2021 an 2020 Rank nstitution Location Sie Focus Res. Age Status Academic Reputation Reputation Employer Faculty Student Citations per Faculty nternational Faculty nternational Students Oerall 1 1 Massachusetts nstitute of Technology (MT) US M CO H 5 B 100.0 100.0 100.0 .1 100.0 1.
Recommended publications
  • A Comparative Study Between Brazil and Portugal
    DOI: 10.36315/2019v2end027 Education and New Developments 2019 OVERVIEW OF DESIGN TEACHING ON ENGINEERING COURSES: A COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN BRAZIL AND PORTUGAL Claudia Alquezar Facca1, Jorge Lino Alves2, & Ana Mae Barbosa3 1Engineering School, Mauá Institute of Technology (Brazil); PPG Design, Anhembi Morumbi University (Brazil); Faculty of Engineering, University of Porto (Portugal) 2INEGI, Faculty of Engineering, University of Porto (Portugal) 3PPG Design, Anhembi Morumbi University (Brazil) Abstract This paper presents an overview of design teaching in the undergraduate engineering courses at the main institutions of higher education in Brazil and Portugal. In order to carry out the comparative study, the curricula of the main engineering courses in Brazil and Portugal were used. The aim of the research is to first analyze how the design, as a disciplinary content, is being introduced in the engineering courses in both countries. In a second moment, a comparative analysis will be made between the information collected in Brazil and in Portugal in order to register how this conjugation is occurring and whether there is some similarity or not in the way of design approach in the engineering courses in each country. As a result, it is discussed how the design can collaborate with the interdisciplinarity between these areas and contribute with the formation of the new competences of the engineer. Keywords: Education, design, engineering, Brazil, Portugal. 1. Introduction Education is the object of study, concern, focus, strategy and discussion in all the nations of the globe and reflects the intense changes the world has witnessed in the last decades of the 20th century, beginning with the two great wars, then the expansion of capitalism and the cultural and economic globalization in the 21th century.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Yearbook
    2020 YEARBOOK 1 QS World University Rankings 2020 Yearbook Published by QS Quacquarelli Symonds Limited. 1 Tranley Mews, Fleet Road, London NW3 2DG United Kingdom qs.com 1st edition, May 2020 Book ISBN: 978-981-14-5329-8 eBook ISBN: 978-981-14-5330-4 Copyright © QS Quacquarelli Symonds Limited 2020 All rights reserved. The entire content of this publication is protected by international copyright. No part of it may be copied or reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted, in any form, without the prior written permission of the publisher. Any permitted reproduction of QS Rankings data must be sourced: QS World University Rankings® 2020. Any other permitted reproduction must be sourced: QS World University Rankings 2020 Yearbook, QS Quacquarelli Symonds Limited 2020. For permission, please write to Monica Hornung Cattan [email protected] Acknowledgements QS would like to thank the advertisers in this edition, the main editorial contributors (see page 9), and the many other QS and external colleagues who have contributed, particularly including the QS Intelligence Unit team behind the QS World University Rankings®: Ben Sowter, Jason Newman, Leigh Kamolins, Monica Hornung Cattan, Anton John Crace, Samuel Ang, Ana Marie Banica, Effie Chen, E Way Chong, Juan Carlos Mejia Cuartas, Alloysius Ching, Alex Chisholm, Ashwin Fernandes, Tony Fregoli, Selina Griffin, Ludovic Highman, Elena Ilie, Daniel Kahn, Yea Yin Kek, Taewan Kim, Andrew MacFarlane, Gabriel Maschião da Costa, David Myers, Larisa Osipova, Ajita Rane, Shiloh Rose, Nicholas Sequeira, Rashmi Sharma, Padmashree Sorate, Violeta Surugiu, Ken Trinh, Jia Ying Wong, Samuel Wong, Yuh Ming Yap, Dennis Yu, Zoya Zaitseva.
    [Show full text]
  • QS World University Rankings® “Trusted by Students Since 2004”
    QS World University Rankings® “Trusted by students since 2004” 2012 Report ) Welcome to the 2012/13 QS World University Rankings® Report he ninth annual QS World University As in previous years this information is TRankings arrive at a time of seismic counterbalanced by citations data sourced change in global higher education. from Scopus, the world’s most comprehensive database of research citations. The rankings also The boom in international study continues incorporate figures on student/faculty ratios to reconfigure the landscape, with well over and international students and faculty, collected 3.5 million students currently taking degrees and verified by a multilingual team of analysts abroad. The central importance of human working within QS Intelligence Unit. capital to 21st century economies is underlined by a global drive to expand the proportion of As the need for greater and more nuanced university graduates, while the competition information increases, QS has continued to to innovate through R&D intensifies every adapt. Rather than cramming a greater num- year. And as government budgets are squeezed ber of indicators into a single ranking table in the aftermath of the recession, in many – which in our view simply creates a mess – countries students and parents are being made since 2009 QS has introduced a series of more to contribute ever more to the cost of funding targeted exercises: QS University Rankings: this expansion. Asia; QS University Rankings: Latin America; QS World University Rankings by Subject; QS All of these changes and many more besides Best Student Cities; QS 50 Under 50; and QS mean that a reliable, trusted and rigorous Stars, a new, comprehensive university rating way of comparing universities worldwide has system.
    [Show full text]
  • QS World University Rankings QS World University Rankings Is an Annual Publication of University QS World University Rankings by Quacquarelli Symonds (QS)
    QS World University Rankings QS World University Rankings is an annual publication of university QS World University rankings by Quacquarelli Symonds (QS). Previously known as Times Rankings Higher Education–QS World University Rankings, the publisher had collaborated with Times Higher Education (THE) magazine to publish its international league tables from 2004 to 2009 before both started to announce their own versions. QS then chose to continue using the pre- existing methodology while Times Higher Education adopted a new Editor Ben Sowter (Head of methodology to create their rankings. Research) The QS system now comprises the global overall and subject rankings Staff Craig O'Callaghan (which name the world's top universities for the study of 48 different writers subjects and five composite faculty areas), alongside five independent Categories Higher education regional tables (Asia, Latin America, Emerging Europe and Central Asia, Frequency Annual the Arab Region, and BRICS).[1] Publisher Quacquarelli Symonds Being the only international ranking to have received International Limited Ranking Expert Group (IREG) approval,[2] the QS ranking is viewed as First issue 2004 (in partnership one of the three most-widely read university rankings in the world, along with THE) with Academic Ranking of World Universities and Times Higher Education 2010 (on its own) [3][4][5][6] World University Rankings. However, it has been criticized for its Country UK overreliance on subjective indicators and reputation surveys, which tend to Language English fluctuate over the years.[7][8][9][10][11] Concern also exists regarding the global consistency and integrity of the data used to generate QS ranking Website www.topuniversities results.[8][12][13][14] .com (https://www.topu niversities.com) THE–QS World University Rankings, 2004 This is the 2004 THE–QS World University Rankings list of the top 200 universities in the world.
    [Show full text]
  • QS Global 200 Business Schools Report Unlocking the World’S Top 200 Business Schools According to MBA Employers
    2013/2014 QS Global 200 Business Schools Report Unlocking the world’s top 200 business schools according to MBA employers Nunzio Quacquarelli, MA Cambridge, MBA Wharton Danny Byrne, BA Oxford, MA University College London www.TopMBA.com 3 Introduction The QS Global 200 Business Schools Report originated in the early 1990s as an alternative to business school rankings. The ratings provide a detailed overview of the most popular business schools around the world, based on details provided to QS by over 4,318 employers who actively recruit MBA graduates. Without inferring any overall rankings, QS’ objective is to provide a resource to help prospective MBA students identify the business schools from which employers most actively recruit. The research is intended to be of use to MBA employers, prospective MBA students and institutions worldwide that are interested in international business education and recruitment trends. At the heart of the report is the definitive list of 200 business schools from which employers prefer to recruit MBAs. This list is compiled from an annual survey of human resources (HR) managers and line managers with recruiting responsibilities at companies around the world. Each year, employers recommend new schools to be added to the list. This is then sent to other recruiters to rate. Follow us QS Global 200 Business Schools Report 2013/14 1.0 Fast Facts www.TopMBA.com 5 • Five schools received the maximum score for employer recognition, identifying them as the leading schools in their region: Harvard and Stanford (North America), INSEAD - France and London Business School (Europe), and INSEAD – Singapore (Asia-Pacific).
    [Show full text]
  • QS Top Universities: THES - QS World University Rank
    QS Top Universities: THES - QS World University Rank... www.topuniversities.com Home University Rankings Study Abroad Country Guides Grad School Student Finance Distance Learning QS Top Universities » University Rankings » Results » 2007 » Overall Rankings » Top 400 universities About QS Sign In School Access Sitemap Contact U THES - QS World University Rankings 2007 - Top 400 Universities Discover the brand new THES - QS World University Rankings. How do they compare to last year's rankings? And who is number one? Click the institute names to be directed to the profile of the chosen university. Rank School Name Country 1 HARVARD University United States 2= YALE University United States 2= University of OXFORD United Kingdom 2= University of CAMBRIDGE United Kingdom 5 Imperial College LONDON United Kingdom 6 PRINCETON University United States 7= University of CHICAGO United States 7= CALIFORNIA Institute of Technology (Calt... United States 9 UCL (University College LONDON) United Kingdom 10 MASSACHUSETTS Institute of Technology (M... United States 11 COLUMBIA University United States 12 MCGILL University Canada 13 DUKE University United States 14 University of PENNSYLVANIA United States 15 JOHNS HOPKINS University United States 16 AUSTRALIAN National University Australia 17 University of TOKYO Japan 18 University of HONG KONG Hong Kong 19 STANFORD University United States 20= CORNELL University United States 20= CARNEGIE MELLON University United States 22 University of California, BERKELEY United States 23 University of EDINBURGH United
    [Show full text]
  • PORTUGAL 7 Institutions Ranked in at Least One Subject 4 Institutions in World's Top 200 for at Least One Subject
    QS World University Rankings by Subject 2014 COUNTRY FILE 1616 7 4institutions cited by academics in at least one subject PORTUGAL 7 institutions ranked in at least one subject 4 institutions in world's top 200 for at least one subject INSTITUTIONAL REPRESENTATION BY SUBJECT TOP INSTITUTIONS BY SUBJECT ARTS & HUMANITIES ENGLISH English Language & Literature History Linguistics Modern Languages HISTORY 1 University of Lisbon [151-200] 1 University of Coimbra 1 University of Lisbon 1 University of Lisbon [151-200] 2 University of Coimbra 2 Universidade Nova de Lisboa 2 University of Coimbra 2 University of Coimbra [301-400] LINGUISTICS 3 University of Porto 3 University of Lisbon 3 Universidade Catolica Portuguesa, Lisboa 3 Universidade Nova de Lisboa [301-400] 4 4 Universidade Catolica Portuguesa, Lisboa 4 University of Porto 4 University of Porto [301-400] LANGUAGES 5 5 University of Porto 5 Universidade Nova de Lisboa 5 ISCTE - Instituto Universitario de Lisboa ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY PHILOSOPHY Philosophy Computer Science & Information Systems Engineering - Chemical Engineering - Civil & Structural 1 Universidade Nova de Lisboa 1 University of Porto [301-400] 1 University of Porto [101-150] 1 University of Porto [101-150] COMPUTER SCIENCE 2 Universidade Catolica Portuguesa, Lisboa 2 University of Lisbon [301-400] 2 University of Lisbon 2 University of Coimbra [101-150] 3 University of Coimbra 3 Universidade Nova de Lisboa [301-400] 3 Universidade Nova de Lisboa 3 Universidade Nova de Lisboa CHEMICAL ENGINEERING 4 University of Evora
    [Show full text]
  • Portugal Psychology
    QS World University Rankings by Subject 2016 COUNTRY FILE v1.0 Subject Influence Map ■ Arts & Humanities ■ Engineering & Technology ■ Life Sciences & Medicine ARCHAEOLOGY ■ Natural Sciences ■ Social Sciences & Management % Institutions Ranked in Subject % Institutions Scored in Subject PORTUGAL PSYCHOLOGY Overall Country Performance Institutions cited by academics in at least one subject 19 Subjects featuring at least one institution from Portugal 23 Institutions ranked in at least one subject 14 Institutions in published ranking for at least one subject 5 Range Representation by Subject The following tables display the number of institutions from Portugal featured in each subject within each given range. Please note that different numbers of institutions are presented overall in different subjects - ranges shaded in grey do not exist for the subjects in question ARTS & HUMANITIES ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY Top 50 51-100 101-150 151-200 201-250 251-300 301-350 351-400 Top 50 51-100 101-150 151-200 201-250 251-300 301-350 351-400 Archaeology 0 0 Computer Science & Information Systems 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 Architecture / Built Environment 0 0 Engineering - Chemical 0 0 1 1 Art & Design 0 0 Engineering - Civil & Structural 0 1 2 0 English Language & Literature 0 0 0 0 0 1 Engineering - Electrical & Electronic 0 0 0 1 0 0 History 0 0 0 1 Engineering - Mechanical, Aeronautical & Manufacturing 0 0 0 1 0 0 Linguistics 0 0 0 0 Engineering - Mineral & Mining 0 0 Modern Languages 0 0 0 1 1 1 Performing Arts 0 0 LIFE SCIENCES & MEDICINE Philosophy 0 0 0
    [Show full text]
  • Spixel Design Communications
    QS Quacquarelli Symonds 1 Tranley Mews Fleet Road NW3 6DG London QS TOP 500 UNIVERSITIES (2011 – 2013): Argentina Belgium 1. Instituto Tecnológico De Buenos Aires (ITBA) 2. Pontificia Universidad Católica Argentina Santa 1. Katholieke Universiteit Leuven María De Los Buenos Aires (UCA) 2. Université Catholique De Louvain (UCL) 3. Universidad Austral 3. Université Libre De Bruxelles (ULB) 4. Universidad De Buenos Aires 4. University Of Antwerp 5. Universidad De San Andrés 5. University Of Ghent 6. Universidad Nacional De Córdoba 7. Universidad Nacional De La Plata 6. University Of Liege 7. Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) Australia Brazil 1. Australian National University (ANU) 2. Bond University 1. Universidade De São Paulo (USP) 3. Charles Darwin University 2. Universidade Estadual De Campinas (UNICAMP) 4. Curtin University 3. Universidade Estadual Paulista "Júlio De 5. Curtin University (Formerly: Curtin University Of Mesquita Filho" Technology) 4. Universidade Federal De Minas Gerais 6. Deakin University 5. Universidade Federal De São Paulo (UNIFESP) 7. Flinders University 6. Universidade Federal Do Rio De Janeiro 8. Griffith University 9. James Cook University (JCU) Canada 10. La Trobe University 11. Macquarie University 1. Carleton University 12. Monash University 2. Concordia University 13. Murdoch University 3. Dalhousie University 14. Queensland University Of Technology (QUT) 4. Laval University 15. Rmit University 5. Mcgill University 16. Swinburne University Of Technology 6. Mcmaster University 17. The University Of Adelaide 18. The University Of Melbourne 7. Queen'S University 19. The University Of New South Wales (UNSW) 8. Simon Fraser University 20. The University Of Queensland (UQ) 9. The University Of Western Ontario 21. The University Of Sydney 10.
    [Show full text]
  • Global University Rankings
    Global University Rankings: An Overview CONTENTS 1. Introduction 2. Rankings Overview 3. Other Rankings 4. Rankings Methodologies & Results First Published i. US News & World Report 1985 ii. CHE (CHE Centre for Higher Education Development) 1998 iii. Academic Ranking of World Universities (ARWU) (Shanghai Jiao Tong) 2003 iv. QS World University Rankings® (Quacquarelli Symonds) 2004 v. Webometrics* Ranking Web of World Universities (Cybermetrics Lab) 2004 vi. 4icu*.org University Web Ranking 2005 vii. HEEACT (Higher Education Evaluation and Accreditation Council of Taiwan) 2007 viii. Mines ParisTech* 2007 ix. Leiden (Centre for Science and Technology Studies, Leiden University) 2007 x. Global Universities Ranking (Independent Rating Agency RatER) 2009 xi. SCImago Institutions Rankings (SIR) 2009 xii. Times Higher Education 2010 xiii. High Impact University (University of Western Australia) 2010 *Non-academic rankings INTRODUCTION International university rankings are a comparatively recent phenomenon, with the first such exercise emerging in 2003. Rankings of international business schools, such as those published in the Financial Times or Business Week, have been with us for some time. However, the notion of comparing universities comprehensively on an international scale first emerged from Shanghai Jiao Tong University, with its Academic Ranking of World Universities in 2003, and from QS, with the THE-QS World University Rankings in 2004. Domestic rankings have been part of the higher education landscape for many years, with US News & World Report’s ‗America‘s Best Colleges‘ report being one of the first, emerging in 1983. However, that very landscape is being transformed by the onward march of globalisation, with international student mobility serving as a key indicator of change.
    [Show full text]
  • QS World University Rankings
    QS World University Rankings QS World University Rankings is an annual publication of university rankings by Quacquarelli Symonds (QS). The QS system comprises QS WORLD UNIVERSITY of three parts: the global overall ranking, the subject rankings, which RANKING name the world's top universities for the study of 51 different subjects and five composite faculty areas, as well as five independent regional tables, namely Asia, Latin America, Emerging Europe and Central Asia, the Arab Region, and BRICS.[1] Editor Ben Sowter (Head of The QS ranking receives approval from the International Ranking Research) Expert Group (IREG),[2] and is viewed as one of the three most- Staff Craig O'Callaghan widely read university rankings in the world, along with Academic Ranking of World Universities and Times Higher Education World writers University Rankings.[3][4][5][6] According to Alexa Internet, it is the Categories Higher education [7] most widely viewed university ranking worldwide. However, it has Frequency Annual been criticized for its overreliance on subjective indicators and reputation surveys, which tend to fluctuate over the Publisher Quacquarelli Symonds years.[8][9][10][11][12] Concern also exists regarding the global Limited consistency and integrity of the data used to generate QS ranking First issue 2004 (in partnership [9][13][14][15] results. with THE) 2010 (on its own) The QS ranking was previously known as Times Higher Education– QS World University Rankings. The publisher had collaborated with Country United Kingdom Times Higher Education (THE) magazine to publish its international Language English league tables from 2004 to 2009 before both started to announce their Website www.topuniversities own versions.
    [Show full text]
  • BUSINESS SCHOOLS2017 REPORT Unlocking the World's Top 250 Business Schools
    1 QS Global 250 BUSINESS SCHOOLS REPORT 2017 Unlocking the world's top 250 business schools INTRODUCING: THE QS MAGIC MBA QUADRANTS FOR EMPLOYABILITY AND RESEARCH EXCELLENCE Follow us 2 Contents Executive Summary 3 Headlines 3 The QS Magic MBA Quadrants 4 The Global 250 Business Schools: Regional Rankings in Employability and Research Excellence 5 The Methodology 7 Introduction 8 Methodology: In-Depth Account 9 The QS Magic MBA Quadrants for Employability and Research Excellence 14 The MBA in North America 20 The MBA in Europe 29 The MBA in Asia-Pacific 36 The MBA in Latin America 41 The MBA in the Middle East & Africa 45 Supplementary Data 49 Executive Summary 3 Welcome to the QS Global 250 Business Schools Report 2017 - QS’s guide to the world’s best business schools, providing regional rankings of full-time MBA programs across two indicators, and presenting them in a new, innovative format: The QS Magic MBA Quadrants for Employability and Research Excellence. Headlines ð The QS Global 250 Business Schools Report 2017 identifies the top 250 full-time MBA programs around the world, in 36 different countries. ð The largest MBA employer survey ever conducted - 12,125 MBA employers (over five years) globally provide insight into the best full-time MBA programs for graduate employability. ð The largest survey of academics ever conducted – 76,798 academics (over five years) of which 8,376 are experts in the fields of business and management, provide insight into the business schools which are producing the best academic research. (Results are drawn from the same academic survey which underpins the QS World University Rankings by Subject).
    [Show full text]