Guide to Services Welcome
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
A Comparative Study Between Brazil and Portugal
DOI: 10.36315/2019v2end027 Education and New Developments 2019 OVERVIEW OF DESIGN TEACHING ON ENGINEERING COURSES: A COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN BRAZIL AND PORTUGAL Claudia Alquezar Facca1, Jorge Lino Alves2, & Ana Mae Barbosa3 1Engineering School, Mauá Institute of Technology (Brazil); PPG Design, Anhembi Morumbi University (Brazil); Faculty of Engineering, University of Porto (Portugal) 2INEGI, Faculty of Engineering, University of Porto (Portugal) 3PPG Design, Anhembi Morumbi University (Brazil) Abstract This paper presents an overview of design teaching in the undergraduate engineering courses at the main institutions of higher education in Brazil and Portugal. In order to carry out the comparative study, the curricula of the main engineering courses in Brazil and Portugal were used. The aim of the research is to first analyze how the design, as a disciplinary content, is being introduced in the engineering courses in both countries. In a second moment, a comparative analysis will be made between the information collected in Brazil and in Portugal in order to register how this conjugation is occurring and whether there is some similarity or not in the way of design approach in the engineering courses in each country. As a result, it is discussed how the design can collaborate with the interdisciplinarity between these areas and contribute with the formation of the new competences of the engineer. Keywords: Education, design, engineering, Brazil, Portugal. 1. Introduction Education is the object of study, concern, focus, strategy and discussion in all the nations of the globe and reflects the intense changes the world has witnessed in the last decades of the 20th century, beginning with the two great wars, then the expansion of capitalism and the cultural and economic globalization in the 21th century. -
2019 UI Greenmetric World University Rankings in Indonesia
2019 UI GreenMetric World University Rankings in Indonesia IND World University Country SI EC WS WR TR ED Total Rank Rank 1 27 Universitas Indonesia Indonesia 1050 1625 1500 825 1375 1650 8025 2 40 Bogor Agricultural University Indonesia 1400 1200 1425 575 1475 1700 7775 3 47 Universitas Gadjah Mada Indonesia 900 1300 1500 875 1375 1675 7625 4 50 Diponegoro University Indonesia 750 1575 1350 950 1225 1750 7600 Institut Teknologi Sepuluh 59 Indonesia 975 1350 1275 925 1225 1800 7550 5 Nopember 6 71 Universitas Negeri Semarang Indonesia 1050 1475 1125 800 1450 1500 7400 7 96 Universitas Sebelas Maret Indonesia 775 1450 1275 850 1275 1425 7050 8 109 Universitas Islam Indonesia Indonesia 650 1400 1050 800 1275 1750 6925 9 135 Telkom University Indonesia 775 1250 1350 700 1325 1150 6550 10 142 Universitas Padjadjaran Indonesia 675 1175 1350 725 1150 1400 6475 Universitas Islam Negeri Raden 172 Indonesia 950 1450 1125 650 1250 825 6250 11 Intan Lampung Universitas Muhammadiyah 189 Indonesia 725 1450 975 775 1150 1050 6125 12 Yogyakarta 213 Universitas Multimedia Nusantara Indonesia 575 1500 1200 900 950 900 6025 13 14 250 Universitas Sumatera Utara Indonesia 800 925 1275 775 1075 950 5800 15 255 Airlangga University Indonesia 875 875 900 650 1325 1125 5750 16 257 Brawijaya University Indonesia 575 1250 900 600 950 1450 5725 17 303 Universitas Medan Area Indonesia 775 1075 975 450 1025 1125 5425 18 343 Universitas Lampung Indonesia 700 1275 900 525 850 975 5225 19 355 Yogyakarta State University Indonesia 425 1150 900 450 1325 900 5150 20 407 -
2020 Yearbook
2020 YEARBOOK 1 QS World University Rankings 2020 Yearbook Published by QS Quacquarelli Symonds Limited. 1 Tranley Mews, Fleet Road, London NW3 2DG United Kingdom qs.com 1st edition, May 2020 Book ISBN: 978-981-14-5329-8 eBook ISBN: 978-981-14-5330-4 Copyright © QS Quacquarelli Symonds Limited 2020 All rights reserved. The entire content of this publication is protected by international copyright. No part of it may be copied or reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted, in any form, without the prior written permission of the publisher. Any permitted reproduction of QS Rankings data must be sourced: QS World University Rankings® 2020. Any other permitted reproduction must be sourced: QS World University Rankings 2020 Yearbook, QS Quacquarelli Symonds Limited 2020. For permission, please write to Monica Hornung Cattan [email protected] Acknowledgements QS would like to thank the advertisers in this edition, the main editorial contributors (see page 9), and the many other QS and external colleagues who have contributed, particularly including the QS Intelligence Unit team behind the QS World University Rankings®: Ben Sowter, Jason Newman, Leigh Kamolins, Monica Hornung Cattan, Anton John Crace, Samuel Ang, Ana Marie Banica, Effie Chen, E Way Chong, Juan Carlos Mejia Cuartas, Alloysius Ching, Alex Chisholm, Ashwin Fernandes, Tony Fregoli, Selina Griffin, Ludovic Highman, Elena Ilie, Daniel Kahn, Yea Yin Kek, Taewan Kim, Andrew MacFarlane, Gabriel Maschião da Costa, David Myers, Larisa Osipova, Ajita Rane, Shiloh Rose, Nicholas Sequeira, Rashmi Sharma, Padmashree Sorate, Violeta Surugiu, Ken Trinh, Jia Ying Wong, Samuel Wong, Yuh Ming Yap, Dennis Yu, Zoya Zaitseva. -
North Kalimantan Indonesia
JURISDICTIONAL SUSTAINABILITY PROFILE NORTH KALIMANTAN INDONESIA FOREST NO FOREST DEFORESTATION (1990-2015) LOW-EMISSION RURAL DEVELOPMENT (LED-R) AT A GLANCE DRIVERS OF Infrastructure development • Newest province in Indonesia, established in 2012 DEFORESTATION Fisheries (formerly part of East Kalimantan) Industrial mining TANJUNG SELOR Large-scale legal logging • 30% of provincial population are migrants from other provinces, with recent migrants settling in urban areas; Large-scale agriculture g population growth agricultural land conversion, AVERAGE ANNUAL 11.33 Mt CO2 (2010-2015) Includes Data sources: production decrease & increased reliance on imports EMISSIONS FROM above-ground biomass & peat Socio-economic: BPS decomposition Deforestation: Derived DEFORESTATION from Ministry of • 90% of provincial area contained in forests zoned for AREA 68,996 km2 Forestry data protection, conservation & production POPULATION 716,407 (2018) • Palm oil accounts for 62% of agricultural production HDI 69.84 (2017) Deforestation GDP USD 4.1 billion GDP • Kayan Mentarang National Park (KMNP), one of the Average yearly (2017) deforestation (using 51 50 largest conservation areas in SE Asia & a central part of the FREL baseline GINI 0.303 (2018) 2 period 1990-2012) TRILLIONS IDR the Heart of Borneo Initiative, encompasses over 15% 6 40 MAIN ECONOMIC of the jurisdiction (13,600 km2) Fish farming ACTIVITIES 30 Extraction of non-renewable 4 • Endangered Bornean elephants in the Sebuku forest resources 20 are protected by national regulations & culturally -
Peserta Dan Jadwal Pembekalan BUDI-LN Gel-1 2016
Lampiran Surat : Nomor : Tanggal : LAMPIRAN 1. Daftar Peserta Lokakarya Pra-Keberangkatan Beasiswa Unggulan Dosen Indonesia (BUDI) Luar Negeri Gel-1 Tahun 2016 Yogyakarta, 12-14 Agustus 2016 No No Registrasi Nama NIDN PT Asal PT Tujuan Negara Mulai Studi Program Studi Jenjang UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN MECHANICAL AND CHEMICAL 1 160001028401 YUSRON SUGIARTO 0001028401 UNIVERSITAS BRAWIJAYA AUSTRALIA SEP-2016 S3 AUSTRALIA ENGINEERING 2 160001078304 LA ODE AHMAD BARATA 0001078304 UNIVERSITAS HALU OLEO KANAZAWA UNIVERSITY JAPAN SEP-2016 TEKNIK MESIN S3 UNIVERSITAS PENDIDIKAN 3 160001118106 DENNY ANDRIANA 0001118106 UNIVERSITY OF STRATHCLYDE UNITED KINGDOM OKT-2016 ACCOUNTING AND FINANCE S3 INDONESIA 4 160003108901 SRI OKTAMULIANI 0003108901 UNIVERSITAS JAMBI TOHOKU UNIVERSITY JAPAN OKT-2016 BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING S3 5 160003117304 NIKEN PUJIRAHAYU 0003117304 UNIVERSITAS HALU OLEO EHIME UNIVERSITY JAPAN SEP-2016 APPLIED BIORESOURCE SCIENCE S3 NAVAL ARCHITECTURE AND MARINE 6 160003118402 SAMUEL 0003118402 UNIVERSITAS DIPONEGORO PUKYONG NATIONAL UNIVERSITY SOUTH KOREA AGU-2016 S3 SYSTEM ENGINEERING NUTRITION, TOXICOLOGY & 7 160004078501 ADRIYAN PRAMONO 0004078501 UNIVERSITAS DIPONEGORO MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY NETHERLANDS SEP-2016 TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH IN S3 METABOLISM 8 160004097901 ADE CANDRA 0004097901 UNIVERSITAS SUMATERA UTARA KANAZAWA UNIVERSITY JAPAN SEP-2016 ENVIROMENTAL DESIGN S3 9 160004108002 OKTAVIAN ABRAHAM LANTANG 0004108002 UNIVERSITAS SAM RATULANGI UNIVERSITY OF DEBRECEN HUNGARY SEP-2016 INFORMATICS S3 10 160005058009 SAKUNDA ANGGARINI -
Hasil Review Proposal Konsorsium Riset Dan Inovasi Covid-19 (Pencegahan)
HASIL REVIEW PROPOSAL KONSORSIUM RISET DAN INOVASI COVID-19 (PENCEGAHAN) NO. JUDUL RISET DAN INOVASI LEMBAGA NAMA KETUA Pembuatan Baby Face Shield Menggunakan Teknologi 3D Printing untuk Melindungi Bayi dari Wabah 1 Lembaga Penerbangan dan Antariksa Nasional (LAPAN) Afid Nugroho, S.T., M.Eng. Covid-19 dan Persiapan New Normal Life Instrumen Screening Virus Covid 19 Di Lingkungan dan Sistem Kendali Light Disinfectant Terintegrasi 2 Universitas Dian Nuswantoro - LPPM Sari Ayu Wulandari, ST, M.Eng dengan Teknologi Ultraviolet Electronic Nose Internet Of Things (Uv Enose-Iot) Adaptasi Fase New Normal Pandemi Covid-19: Pengembangan Prototipe Disinfektan Ruang 3 Pertemuan dan Kabin Penumpang Transportasi Umum Melalui Semburan Kontinu Partikel Uap Universitas Sam Ratulangi (Unsrat) - LPPM Stenly Wullur, SPi, MSc, PhD Menggunakan Ekstrak Bahan Alami Pengembangan dan Penerapan Bioplastik Antibakteri untuk Bahan APD Hazmat yang Ramah Badan Pengkajian dan Penerapan Teknologi (BPPT) - 4 Dr. Dadang Suhendar, M.Eng. Lingkungan Pusat Teknologi Bioindustri Inovasi Produk Medicated Oil dan Hand Sanitizer Berbasis Minyak Kayu Putih dan Minyak Nilam 5 Universitas Syiah Kuala (UNSYIAH) Dr. Binawati Ginting, M.Si untuk Menghadapi Bencana COVID-19 Pengembangan Sediaan kapsul kombinasi Ekstrak Ikan gabus, Meniran dan Temulawak sebagai 6 Universitas Sumatera Utara (USU) - Fakultas Farmasi Imam Bagus Sumantri, S.Farm., M.Si., Apt. Immunomodulator Pencegahan COVID-19 Pengembangan herbal penurun kadar kolesterol dan peningkat sistem imun berbasis tumbuhan asli 7 Universitas Mulawarman (UNMUL) - LPPM Dr. dr. Swandari Paramita, M.Kes Kalimantan Timur untuk menurunkan risiko pasien COVID-19 dengan komorbid Pengembangan Koper Sterilisasi Portable Berbasis UV-C Guna Mendukung Normal Baru Dalam Dr. Eng. Ir. R. Rachmat A. -
QS World University Rankings® “Trusted by Students Since 2004”
QS World University Rankings® “Trusted by students since 2004” 2012 Report ) Welcome to the 2012/13 QS World University Rankings® Report he ninth annual QS World University As in previous years this information is TRankings arrive at a time of seismic counterbalanced by citations data sourced change in global higher education. from Scopus, the world’s most comprehensive database of research citations. The rankings also The boom in international study continues incorporate figures on student/faculty ratios to reconfigure the landscape, with well over and international students and faculty, collected 3.5 million students currently taking degrees and verified by a multilingual team of analysts abroad. The central importance of human working within QS Intelligence Unit. capital to 21st century economies is underlined by a global drive to expand the proportion of As the need for greater and more nuanced university graduates, while the competition information increases, QS has continued to to innovate through R&D intensifies every adapt. Rather than cramming a greater num- year. And as government budgets are squeezed ber of indicators into a single ranking table in the aftermath of the recession, in many – which in our view simply creates a mess – countries students and parents are being made since 2009 QS has introduced a series of more to contribute ever more to the cost of funding targeted exercises: QS University Rankings: this expansion. Asia; QS University Rankings: Latin America; QS World University Rankings by Subject; QS All of these changes and many more besides Best Student Cities; QS 50 Under 50; and QS mean that a reliable, trusted and rigorous Stars, a new, comprehensive university rating way of comparing universities worldwide has system. -
Fatwas on Boosting Environmental Conservation in Indonesia
religions Article Fatwas on Boosting Environmental Conservation in Indonesia Fachruddin Majeri Mangunjaya 1,2,* and Gugah Praharawati 1,3 1 Center for Islamic Studies, Universitas Nasional, Jl Sawo Manila, Ps Minggu, Pejaten Jakarta 12520, Indonesia; [email protected] 2 Graduate School, Universitas Nasional, Jl Harsono RM, Ragunan, Jakarta 12550, Indonesia 3 Doctoral Program Graduate School, IPB University, Dramaga, Bogor 16680, Indonesia * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 1 September 2019; Accepted: 29 September 2019; Published: 12 October 2019 Abstract: Concern about the importance of getting Muslims involved in the movement for a better environment in Indonesia has existed since the 1980s, since the involvement of the Islamic boarding school leaders in triggering their community and the involvement of NGOs in empowering the community, particularly in environmental and agricultural restoration. After the Bogor Declaration on Muslim Action on Climate Change 2010, in 2011, The Indonesia Council of Ulama (MUI) established the Institute for Environmental and Natural Resources (PLHSDA) in the MUI’s Clerical Conference. The role of this unit within the MUI is very important because the MUI has a special unit in tackling various important issues in the environment, where Muslims can find authoritative answers to environmental challenges. So far, there have been seven MUI fatawa¯ (edicts) released by MUI related to the environment and the conservation movement. This paper will highlight environmental movements by the Muslim community in Indonesia, and describe how the implementation of the MUI fatawa¯ can contribute to addressing the massive increase in environmental challenges and increase the involvement and understanding of the Muslim communities in tackling biodiversity conservation as well as climate change. -
Green Campus Initiative: Transforming Law in Book Into Law in Action*
GREEN CAMPUS INITIATIVE: TRANSFORMING LAW IN BOOK INTO LAW IN ACTION* Rina Shahriyani Shahrullah,** Agustina Fitrianingrum,*** and R.A. Widyanti Diah Lestari**** Enviomental Law Deparment, Faculty of Law Universitas Internasional Batam, Batam Gajah Mada Street, Baloi - Sei Ladi, Batam 29442 Abstract Global warming has become a serious threat to our earth today. To overcome the problems of global warming, various parties should get involved including campus community (students, staff and faculty members). The participation of tertiary education institutions in minimizing global warming is referred to as ‘green campus initiative’ (GCI). This participation is mandated by Law No.32 of 2009 on Environmental Protection and Management. This paper suggests the adoption of GCI and provides a GCI model for In- donesian higher education institutions. This paper also discusses the GCI activities which can be adopted either by small or big campuses in Indonesia. Keywords: green campus initiative, Batam. Intisari Pemanasan global telah menjadi ancaman serius bagi bumi kita dewasa ini. Untuk mengatasi masalah pemanasan global, berbagai pihak telah terlibat termasuk komunitas kampus (mahasiswa, karyawan dan dosen). Partisipasi perguruan tinggi dalam meminimalkan pemanasan global dinamakan ‘green campus initiative (GCI)’. Partisipasi ini diamanatkan oleh Undang-Undang Nomor 32 Tahun 2009 tentang Perlind- ungan dan Pengelolaan Lingkungan Hidup. Makalah ini menyarankan penerapan GCI dan memberikan Model GCI untuk perguruan tinggi di Indonesia. Makalah ini -
Keseluruhan Se Indonesia HASIL PERANKINGAN Webometrics Edisi Januari 2017 Sumber: Ind
Keseluruhan Se Indonesia HASIL PERANKINGAN Webometrics Edisi Januari 2017 Sumber: http://webometrics.info/en/Asia/Indonesia Ind. World Presence Impact Openness Excellence University Rank Rank Rank* Rank* Rank* Rank* 1 817 Universitas Gadjah Mada 39 481 1013 1977 2 861 Universitas Indonesia 188 446 1834 1864 3 987 Institute of Technology Bandung 240 711 1427 1901 4 1539 Bogor Agricultural University 159 1465 2322 2497 5 1616 Brawijaya University 81 886 2357 3184 6 1697 Universitas Padjadjaran 352 1097 2399 3012 7 1904 Universitas Diponegoro 357 973 1850 3663 8 2009 Universitas Riau 1586 1297 3430 3097 9 2148 Universitas Udayana 572 1927 3326 3184 10 2188 Universitas Airlangga 224 1497 2919 3720 11 2270 Universitas Sebelas Maret 494 489 3685 4672 12 2273 Universitas Syiah Kuala 695 4267 3039 2497 13 2399 Universitas Hasanuddin 816 3686 2856 2964 14 2528 Universitas Lampung 545 2067 4317 3663 15 2622 Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember 503 2447 2390 4031 16 2725 Universitas Jenderal Soedirman 914 3192 4061 3505 17 2843 Universitas Ahmad Dahlan Yogyakarta 562 1441 4110 4672 18 2870 Universitas Tadulako 1050 331 4655 5777 19 2875 Petra Christian University 837 2868 4470 3859 20 3231 Bina Nusantara BINUS University 545 4392 3853 4141 Universitas Pendikan Indonesia / Indonesia 21 3327 515 1828 1646 5777 University of Education 22 3426 Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta 535 1564 3277 5777 23 3451 Universitas Mercu Buana 476 1344 4470 5777 24 3468 Universitas Dian Nuswantoro 1023 5139 4317 4141 25 3498 Universitas Surabaya 1405 5230 3507 4243 -
QS World University Rankings QS World University Rankings Is an Annual Publication of University QS World University Rankings by Quacquarelli Symonds (QS)
QS World University Rankings QS World University Rankings is an annual publication of university QS World University rankings by Quacquarelli Symonds (QS). Previously known as Times Rankings Higher Education–QS World University Rankings, the publisher had collaborated with Times Higher Education (THE) magazine to publish its international league tables from 2004 to 2009 before both started to announce their own versions. QS then chose to continue using the pre- existing methodology while Times Higher Education adopted a new Editor Ben Sowter (Head of methodology to create their rankings. Research) The QS system now comprises the global overall and subject rankings Staff Craig O'Callaghan (which name the world's top universities for the study of 48 different writers subjects and five composite faculty areas), alongside five independent Categories Higher education regional tables (Asia, Latin America, Emerging Europe and Central Asia, Frequency Annual the Arab Region, and BRICS).[1] Publisher Quacquarelli Symonds Being the only international ranking to have received International Limited Ranking Expert Group (IREG) approval,[2] the QS ranking is viewed as First issue 2004 (in partnership one of the three most-widely read university rankings in the world, along with THE) with Academic Ranking of World Universities and Times Higher Education 2010 (on its own) [3][4][5][6] World University Rankings. However, it has been criticized for its Country UK overreliance on subjective indicators and reputation surveys, which tend to Language English fluctuate over the years.[7][8][9][10][11] Concern also exists regarding the global consistency and integrity of the data used to generate QS ranking Website www.topuniversities results.[8][12][13][14] .com (https://www.topu niversities.com) THE–QS World University Rankings, 2004 This is the 2004 THE–QS World University Rankings list of the top 200 universities in the world. -
QS Global 200 Business Schools Report Unlocking the World’S Top 200 Business Schools According to MBA Employers
2013/2014 QS Global 200 Business Schools Report Unlocking the world’s top 200 business schools according to MBA employers Nunzio Quacquarelli, MA Cambridge, MBA Wharton Danny Byrne, BA Oxford, MA University College London www.TopMBA.com 3 Introduction The QS Global 200 Business Schools Report originated in the early 1990s as an alternative to business school rankings. The ratings provide a detailed overview of the most popular business schools around the world, based on details provided to QS by over 4,318 employers who actively recruit MBA graduates. Without inferring any overall rankings, QS’ objective is to provide a resource to help prospective MBA students identify the business schools from which employers most actively recruit. The research is intended to be of use to MBA employers, prospective MBA students and institutions worldwide that are interested in international business education and recruitment trends. At the heart of the report is the definitive list of 200 business schools from which employers prefer to recruit MBAs. This list is compiled from an annual survey of human resources (HR) managers and line managers with recruiting responsibilities at companies around the world. Each year, employers recommend new schools to be added to the list. This is then sent to other recruiters to rate. Follow us QS Global 200 Business Schools Report 2013/14 1.0 Fast Facts www.TopMBA.com 5 • Five schools received the maximum score for employer recognition, identifying them as the leading schools in their region: Harvard and Stanford (North America), INSEAD - France and London Business School (Europe), and INSEAD – Singapore (Asia-Pacific).