Issues in Higher Education

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Issues in Higher Education Issues in Higher Education Series Editors Guy Neave Saint-Germain-en-Laye, France António M. Magalhães Faculty of Psychology and Education Sciences University of Porto Porto, Portugal Issues in Higher Education is resolutely committed to advancing the comparative dimension in the study of higher education, actively ­encouraging original scholarship building on and out from the ­international and comparative perspectives. Particular preference will be given to studies of a given topic compared across a minimum of two national higher education systems. More information about this series at http://www.palgrave.com/gp/series/14836 Sónia Cardoso Orlanda Tavares • Cristina Sin Teresa Carvalho Editors Structural and Institutional Transformations in Doctoral Education Social, Political and Student Expectations Editors Sónia Cardoso Orlanda Tavares Agency for Assessment and Accreditation Agency for Assessment and Accreditation of Higher Education (A3ES) of Higher Education (A3ES) Lisbon, Portugal Lisbon, Portugal Centre for Research in Higher Education Centre for Research in Higher Education Policies (CIPES), Matosinhos, Portugal Policies (CIPES) Matosinhos, Portugal Cristina Sin Agency for Assessment and Accreditation Teresa Carvalho of Higher Education (A3ES) Department of Social, Political and Lisbon, Portugal Territorial Sciences, University of Aveiro Aveiro, Portugal Centre for Research in Higher Education Policies (CIPES), Matosinhos, Portugal Centre for Research in Higher Education Policies (CIPES) Matosinhos, Portugal Issues in Higher Education ISBN 978-3-030-38045-8 ISBN 978-3-030-38046-5 (eBook) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38046-5 © The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020 This work is subject to copyright. All rights are solely and exclusively licensed by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and ­transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use. The publisher, the authors and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and information in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication. Neither the publisher nor the authors or the editors give a warranty, expressed or implied, with respect to the material contained herein or for any errors or omissions that may have been made. The publisher remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. Cover illustration: © Maram_shutterstock.com This Palgrave Macmillan imprint is published by the registered company Springer Nature Switzerland AG. The registered company address is: Gewerbestrasse 11, 6330 Cham, Switzerland Acknowledgements This work has been funded under the project PTDC/CED-­EDG/ 29726/2017, awarded by the Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT) in Portugal. v Praise for Structural and Institutional Transformations in Doctoral Education “Despite tremendous national differences in doctoral education, there seem to be common, simultaneous, international pressures for both the expansion of Ph.D. graduates, and the re-visioning of the degree itself. The essays in this thoughtful collection raise a broad range of insightful issues and critical perspec- tives on both the shifting role of the doctorate, and the need for, and possibili- ties, of, reform.” —Glen A. Jones, Professor of Higher Education and Dean, Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, University of Toronto, Canada Contents Introduction 1 Cristina Sin and Orlanda Tavares Part I The Macro Level: Structural Transformations in Doctoral Education 11 Rethinking Doctoral Education: University Purposes, Academic Cultures, Mental Health and the Public Good 13 Rosemary Deem Governmental Innovation Policies, Globalisation, and Change in Doctoral Education Worldwide: Are Doctoral Programmes Converging? Trends and Tensions 43 Maresi Nerad Reforms of Doctoral Education in Europe and Diversification of Types 85 Barbara M. Kehm ix x Contents Quality Assurance of Doctoral Education: Current Trends and Future Developments 105 Sónia Cardoso, Maria J. Rosa, and Vera Miguéis Part II The Meso Level: Institutional Readjustments 141 From the Medieval Disputation to the Graduate School 143 Alberto Amaral and Teresa Carvalho How Effective Are Doctoral Schools? Organisational Characteristics and Related Objectives 175 Lukas Baschung Leadership and Institutional Change in Doctoral Education in a Neoliberal Policy Context 203 Ruth Neumann Part III The Micro Level: Career Expectations and Employability of Doctoral Candidates 239 Views on the Usefulness of the PhD Outside Academia: What Do We Know and Need to Know? 241 Lynn McAlpine PhD Students’ Self-Perception of Skills Acquired During Their PhD and Plans for Their Postdoctoral Careers: A Joint Analysis of Doctoral Students at Three Flagship Universities in Asia 275 Hugo Horta Diversifying the Missions and Expectations of Doctoral Education: Are We Losing the Distinctive ‘Added Value’ of the PhD? 325 Corina Balaban Contents xi Building Bridges Between Industry and Academia: What Is the Profile of an Industrial Doctorate Student? 347 Orlanda Tavares, Cristina Sin, and Diana Soares Conclusion: The Transformations in Doctoral Education—A Comprehensive and Critical Approach 375 Teresa Carvalho and Sónia Cardoso Index 391 Notes on Contributors Alberto Amaral is a professor at the University of Porto, Portugal, and a researcher at Centre for Research in Higher Education Policies (CIPES). He was the rector of the University of Porto from 1985 to 1998 and for- mer chair of Consortium of Higher Education Researchers (CHER). He is life-member of International Association of University Presidents (IAUP) and former member of the Board of Programme on Institutional Management in Higher Education/Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (IMHE/OECD). He is the chair of the administration council of the Portuguese Agency for Assessment and Accreditation of Higher Education (A3ES). Corina Balaban is a research associate at the Manchester Institute of Innovation Research, The University of Manchester, UK. She has a back- ground in Education Studies and wrote her PhD thesis on models of doctoral education in the EU and the US. Her doctorate was part of the Marie Curie project Universities in the Knowledge Economy (UNIKE), a four-year collaborative research initiative exploring the dynamic rela- tionships between universities and knowledge economies in Europe and the Asia-Pacific Rim. Lukas Baschung is Professor of Public Management and Dean of the Bachelor programme of Business Administration at the University of Applied Sciences Western Switzerland/Haute école de gestion Arc, Switzerland. His xiii xiv Notes on Contributors PhD thesis focused on doctoral education’s reform in Switzerland and Norway with an analytical approach in the field of ­public management. From 2010 to 2016, he worked for the government of the canton of Vaud, within the Board of Higher Education, lastly as operational director. Sónia Cardoso is a researcher at Agency for Assessment and Accreditation (A3ES) and CIPES. Her main research interests are higher education policies; quality assurance; students and academics, especially their rela- tion with quality assurance; doctoral education; internationalisation; and graduates’ competences and employability. Her published work has appeared in higher education journals, and she has recently co-edited­ a book: European Higher Education and the Internal Market: Tensions Between European Policy and National Sovereignty (2018). Teresa Carvalho is an associate professor at the University of Aveiro, Portugal, and a senior researcher at CIPES. Her main research interests are higher education policies and the professionals’ roles in formulating and implementing public policies. Her published work has appeared in higher education journals. She has recently co-edited Global Challenges, National Initiatives, and Institutional Responses: The transformation of Higher Education (2016); and Professionalism, Managerialism and Reform in Higher Education and the Health Services: The European Welfare State and the Rise of the Knowledge Society (2015). Rosemary Deem is a sociologist, Doctoral School Director, and Professor of Higher Education Management at Royal Holloway, University of London (UoL), Egham, UK. She has been a fellow at the UK Academy of Social Sciences since 2006. She has been the co-editor of Higher Education (Springer) since 2013. She was appointed Officer of the Order of the British Empire (OBE) for services to HE and social sciences in 2013. She is a member at the Peer Review College, European Science Foundation; and co-convenor at the Higher Education Network, European Educational Research Association. She has been chair at the UK Council for Graduate Education from 2015 to 2018. Her research interests include doctoral education, inequalities in HE, academic work, HE leadership, governance, management, and HE policy. Notes on
Recommended publications
  • A Comparative Study Between Brazil and Portugal
    DOI: 10.36315/2019v2end027 Education and New Developments 2019 OVERVIEW OF DESIGN TEACHING ON ENGINEERING COURSES: A COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN BRAZIL AND PORTUGAL Claudia Alquezar Facca1, Jorge Lino Alves2, & Ana Mae Barbosa3 1Engineering School, Mauá Institute of Technology (Brazil); PPG Design, Anhembi Morumbi University (Brazil); Faculty of Engineering, University of Porto (Portugal) 2INEGI, Faculty of Engineering, University of Porto (Portugal) 3PPG Design, Anhembi Morumbi University (Brazil) Abstract This paper presents an overview of design teaching in the undergraduate engineering courses at the main institutions of higher education in Brazil and Portugal. In order to carry out the comparative study, the curricula of the main engineering courses in Brazil and Portugal were used. The aim of the research is to first analyze how the design, as a disciplinary content, is being introduced in the engineering courses in both countries. In a second moment, a comparative analysis will be made between the information collected in Brazil and in Portugal in order to register how this conjugation is occurring and whether there is some similarity or not in the way of design approach in the engineering courses in each country. As a result, it is discussed how the design can collaborate with the interdisciplinarity between these areas and contribute with the formation of the new competences of the engineer. Keywords: Education, design, engineering, Brazil, Portugal. 1. Introduction Education is the object of study, concern, focus, strategy and discussion in all the nations of the globe and reflects the intense changes the world has witnessed in the last decades of the 20th century, beginning with the two great wars, then the expansion of capitalism and the cultural and economic globalization in the 21th century.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Yearbook
    2020 YEARBOOK 1 QS World University Rankings 2020 Yearbook Published by QS Quacquarelli Symonds Limited. 1 Tranley Mews, Fleet Road, London NW3 2DG United Kingdom qs.com 1st edition, May 2020 Book ISBN: 978-981-14-5329-8 eBook ISBN: 978-981-14-5330-4 Copyright © QS Quacquarelli Symonds Limited 2020 All rights reserved. The entire content of this publication is protected by international copyright. No part of it may be copied or reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted, in any form, without the prior written permission of the publisher. Any permitted reproduction of QS Rankings data must be sourced: QS World University Rankings® 2020. Any other permitted reproduction must be sourced: QS World University Rankings 2020 Yearbook, QS Quacquarelli Symonds Limited 2020. For permission, please write to Monica Hornung Cattan [email protected] Acknowledgements QS would like to thank the advertisers in this edition, the main editorial contributors (see page 9), and the many other QS and external colleagues who have contributed, particularly including the QS Intelligence Unit team behind the QS World University Rankings®: Ben Sowter, Jason Newman, Leigh Kamolins, Monica Hornung Cattan, Anton John Crace, Samuel Ang, Ana Marie Banica, Effie Chen, E Way Chong, Juan Carlos Mejia Cuartas, Alloysius Ching, Alex Chisholm, Ashwin Fernandes, Tony Fregoli, Selina Griffin, Ludovic Highman, Elena Ilie, Daniel Kahn, Yea Yin Kek, Taewan Kim, Andrew MacFarlane, Gabriel Maschião da Costa, David Myers, Larisa Osipova, Ajita Rane, Shiloh Rose, Nicholas Sequeira, Rashmi Sharma, Padmashree Sorate, Violeta Surugiu, Ken Trinh, Jia Ying Wong, Samuel Wong, Yuh Ming Yap, Dennis Yu, Zoya Zaitseva.
    [Show full text]
  • QS World University Rankings® “Trusted by Students Since 2004”
    QS World University Rankings® “Trusted by students since 2004” 2012 Report ) Welcome to the 2012/13 QS World University Rankings® Report he ninth annual QS World University As in previous years this information is TRankings arrive at a time of seismic counterbalanced by citations data sourced change in global higher education. from Scopus, the world’s most comprehensive database of research citations. The rankings also The boom in international study continues incorporate figures on student/faculty ratios to reconfigure the landscape, with well over and international students and faculty, collected 3.5 million students currently taking degrees and verified by a multilingual team of analysts abroad. The central importance of human working within QS Intelligence Unit. capital to 21st century economies is underlined by a global drive to expand the proportion of As the need for greater and more nuanced university graduates, while the competition information increases, QS has continued to to innovate through R&D intensifies every adapt. Rather than cramming a greater num- year. And as government budgets are squeezed ber of indicators into a single ranking table in the aftermath of the recession, in many – which in our view simply creates a mess – countries students and parents are being made since 2009 QS has introduced a series of more to contribute ever more to the cost of funding targeted exercises: QS University Rankings: this expansion. Asia; QS University Rankings: Latin America; QS World University Rankings by Subject; QS All of these changes and many more besides Best Student Cities; QS 50 Under 50; and QS mean that a reliable, trusted and rigorous Stars, a new, comprehensive university rating way of comparing universities worldwide has system.
    [Show full text]
  • QS World University Rankings QS World University Rankings Is an Annual Publication of University QS World University Rankings by Quacquarelli Symonds (QS)
    QS World University Rankings QS World University Rankings is an annual publication of university QS World University rankings by Quacquarelli Symonds (QS). Previously known as Times Rankings Higher Education–QS World University Rankings, the publisher had collaborated with Times Higher Education (THE) magazine to publish its international league tables from 2004 to 2009 before both started to announce their own versions. QS then chose to continue using the pre- existing methodology while Times Higher Education adopted a new Editor Ben Sowter (Head of methodology to create their rankings. Research) The QS system now comprises the global overall and subject rankings Staff Craig O'Callaghan (which name the world's top universities for the study of 48 different writers subjects and five composite faculty areas), alongside five independent Categories Higher education regional tables (Asia, Latin America, Emerging Europe and Central Asia, Frequency Annual the Arab Region, and BRICS).[1] Publisher Quacquarelli Symonds Being the only international ranking to have received International Limited Ranking Expert Group (IREG) approval,[2] the QS ranking is viewed as First issue 2004 (in partnership one of the three most-widely read university rankings in the world, along with THE) with Academic Ranking of World Universities and Times Higher Education 2010 (on its own) [3][4][5][6] World University Rankings. However, it has been criticized for its Country UK overreliance on subjective indicators and reputation surveys, which tend to Language English fluctuate over the years.[7][8][9][10][11] Concern also exists regarding the global consistency and integrity of the data used to generate QS ranking Website www.topuniversities results.[8][12][13][14] .com (https://www.topu niversities.com) THE–QS World University Rankings, 2004 This is the 2004 THE–QS World University Rankings list of the top 200 universities in the world.
    [Show full text]
  • QS Global 200 Business Schools Report Unlocking the World’S Top 200 Business Schools According to MBA Employers
    2013/2014 QS Global 200 Business Schools Report Unlocking the world’s top 200 business schools according to MBA employers Nunzio Quacquarelli, MA Cambridge, MBA Wharton Danny Byrne, BA Oxford, MA University College London www.TopMBA.com 3 Introduction The QS Global 200 Business Schools Report originated in the early 1990s as an alternative to business school rankings. The ratings provide a detailed overview of the most popular business schools around the world, based on details provided to QS by over 4,318 employers who actively recruit MBA graduates. Without inferring any overall rankings, QS’ objective is to provide a resource to help prospective MBA students identify the business schools from which employers most actively recruit. The research is intended to be of use to MBA employers, prospective MBA students and institutions worldwide that are interested in international business education and recruitment trends. At the heart of the report is the definitive list of 200 business schools from which employers prefer to recruit MBAs. This list is compiled from an annual survey of human resources (HR) managers and line managers with recruiting responsibilities at companies around the world. Each year, employers recommend new schools to be added to the list. This is then sent to other recruiters to rate. Follow us QS Global 200 Business Schools Report 2013/14 1.0 Fast Facts www.TopMBA.com 5 • Five schools received the maximum score for employer recognition, identifying them as the leading schools in their region: Harvard and Stanford (North America), INSEAD - France and London Business School (Europe), and INSEAD – Singapore (Asia-Pacific).
    [Show full text]
  • University Rankings 2021
    2021 QS Quacquarelli Symonds WORLD UNIVERSITY RANKINGS 2021 Welcome On behalf of all at QS, we are delighted to introduce the 17th edition of the QS World University Rankings (WUR). This year marks 16 years of the world’s most consulted university rankings. The 2021 edition is, however, a particularly poignant one – a reflection of the higher education sector before the global pandemic. We know this pandemic will have painful and wide-reaching effects on our sector and the uncertainty faced by students and institutions alike will be keenly felt. The research intensity of The record-breaking figures for internationalization metrics and faculty recent years may be diffi- student ratio may not be seen again for some years to come. The cult to sustain under the research intensity of recent years may be difficult to sustain under the financial pressure now financial pressure now weighing on institutions. In short, the 2021 WUR weighing on institutions. will likely be a resetting of the trajectory of rankings, looked on in future both as a reminder of the good times and a setpoint to reach for once more. These rankings are, whilst useful for faculty, administrators and policy makers, designed with students at their heart. Now more so than ever, the weight of uncertainty faced by students on where to place their time, effort and money for a world-class education is palpable. With campuses closed, learning ported online and time differences almost an anachronism, the need for objective guidance and independent insights remains strong. Choosing where to study is a complicated and highly personal endeavor, and we hope to play our part in making this decision easier.
    [Show full text]
  • QS Top Universities: THES - QS World University Rank
    QS Top Universities: THES - QS World University Rank... www.topuniversities.com Home University Rankings Study Abroad Country Guides Grad School Student Finance Distance Learning QS Top Universities » University Rankings » Results » 2007 » Overall Rankings » Top 400 universities About QS Sign In School Access Sitemap Contact U THES - QS World University Rankings 2007 - Top 400 Universities Discover the brand new THES - QS World University Rankings. How do they compare to last year's rankings? And who is number one? Click the institute names to be directed to the profile of the chosen university. Rank School Name Country 1 HARVARD University United States 2= YALE University United States 2= University of OXFORD United Kingdom 2= University of CAMBRIDGE United Kingdom 5 Imperial College LONDON United Kingdom 6 PRINCETON University United States 7= University of CHICAGO United States 7= CALIFORNIA Institute of Technology (Calt... United States 9 UCL (University College LONDON) United Kingdom 10 MASSACHUSETTS Institute of Technology (M... United States 11 COLUMBIA University United States 12 MCGILL University Canada 13 DUKE University United States 14 University of PENNSYLVANIA United States 15 JOHNS HOPKINS University United States 16 AUSTRALIAN National University Australia 17 University of TOKYO Japan 18 University of HONG KONG Hong Kong 19 STANFORD University United States 20= CORNELL University United States 20= CARNEGIE MELLON University United States 22 University of California, BERKELEY United States 23 University of EDINBURGH United
    [Show full text]
  • PORTUGAL 7 Institutions Ranked in at Least One Subject 4 Institutions in World's Top 200 for at Least One Subject
    QS World University Rankings by Subject 2014 COUNTRY FILE 1616 7 4institutions cited by academics in at least one subject PORTUGAL 7 institutions ranked in at least one subject 4 institutions in world's top 200 for at least one subject INSTITUTIONAL REPRESENTATION BY SUBJECT TOP INSTITUTIONS BY SUBJECT ARTS & HUMANITIES ENGLISH English Language & Literature History Linguistics Modern Languages HISTORY 1 University of Lisbon [151-200] 1 University of Coimbra 1 University of Lisbon 1 University of Lisbon [151-200] 2 University of Coimbra 2 Universidade Nova de Lisboa 2 University of Coimbra 2 University of Coimbra [301-400] LINGUISTICS 3 University of Porto 3 University of Lisbon 3 Universidade Catolica Portuguesa, Lisboa 3 Universidade Nova de Lisboa [301-400] 4 4 Universidade Catolica Portuguesa, Lisboa 4 University of Porto 4 University of Porto [301-400] LANGUAGES 5 5 University of Porto 5 Universidade Nova de Lisboa 5 ISCTE - Instituto Universitario de Lisboa ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY PHILOSOPHY Philosophy Computer Science & Information Systems Engineering - Chemical Engineering - Civil & Structural 1 Universidade Nova de Lisboa 1 University of Porto [301-400] 1 University of Porto [101-150] 1 University of Porto [101-150] COMPUTER SCIENCE 2 Universidade Catolica Portuguesa, Lisboa 2 University of Lisbon [301-400] 2 University of Lisbon 2 University of Coimbra [101-150] 3 University of Coimbra 3 Universidade Nova de Lisboa [301-400] 3 Universidade Nova de Lisboa 3 Universidade Nova de Lisboa CHEMICAL ENGINEERING 4 University of Evora
    [Show full text]
  • Portugal Psychology
    QS World University Rankings by Subject 2016 COUNTRY FILE v1.0 Subject Influence Map ■ Arts & Humanities ■ Engineering & Technology ■ Life Sciences & Medicine ARCHAEOLOGY ■ Natural Sciences ■ Social Sciences & Management % Institutions Ranked in Subject % Institutions Scored in Subject PORTUGAL PSYCHOLOGY Overall Country Performance Institutions cited by academics in at least one subject 19 Subjects featuring at least one institution from Portugal 23 Institutions ranked in at least one subject 14 Institutions in published ranking for at least one subject 5 Range Representation by Subject The following tables display the number of institutions from Portugal featured in each subject within each given range. Please note that different numbers of institutions are presented overall in different subjects - ranges shaded in grey do not exist for the subjects in question ARTS & HUMANITIES ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY Top 50 51-100 101-150 151-200 201-250 251-300 301-350 351-400 Top 50 51-100 101-150 151-200 201-250 251-300 301-350 351-400 Archaeology 0 0 Computer Science & Information Systems 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 Architecture / Built Environment 0 0 Engineering - Chemical 0 0 1 1 Art & Design 0 0 Engineering - Civil & Structural 0 1 2 0 English Language & Literature 0 0 0 0 0 1 Engineering - Electrical & Electronic 0 0 0 1 0 0 History 0 0 0 1 Engineering - Mechanical, Aeronautical & Manufacturing 0 0 0 1 0 0 Linguistics 0 0 0 0 Engineering - Mineral & Mining 0 0 Modern Languages 0 0 0 1 1 1 Performing Arts 0 0 LIFE SCIENCES & MEDICINE Philosophy 0 0 0
    [Show full text]
  • Spixel Design Communications
    QS Quacquarelli Symonds 1 Tranley Mews Fleet Road NW3 6DG London QS TOP 500 UNIVERSITIES (2011 – 2013): Argentina Belgium 1. Instituto Tecnológico De Buenos Aires (ITBA) 2. Pontificia Universidad Católica Argentina Santa 1. Katholieke Universiteit Leuven María De Los Buenos Aires (UCA) 2. Université Catholique De Louvain (UCL) 3. Universidad Austral 3. Université Libre De Bruxelles (ULB) 4. Universidad De Buenos Aires 4. University Of Antwerp 5. Universidad De San Andrés 5. University Of Ghent 6. Universidad Nacional De Córdoba 7. Universidad Nacional De La Plata 6. University Of Liege 7. Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) Australia Brazil 1. Australian National University (ANU) 2. Bond University 1. Universidade De São Paulo (USP) 3. Charles Darwin University 2. Universidade Estadual De Campinas (UNICAMP) 4. Curtin University 3. Universidade Estadual Paulista "Júlio De 5. Curtin University (Formerly: Curtin University Of Mesquita Filho" Technology) 4. Universidade Federal De Minas Gerais 6. Deakin University 5. Universidade Federal De São Paulo (UNIFESP) 7. Flinders University 6. Universidade Federal Do Rio De Janeiro 8. Griffith University 9. James Cook University (JCU) Canada 10. La Trobe University 11. Macquarie University 1. Carleton University 12. Monash University 2. Concordia University 13. Murdoch University 3. Dalhousie University 14. Queensland University Of Technology (QUT) 4. Laval University 15. Rmit University 5. Mcgill University 16. Swinburne University Of Technology 6. Mcmaster University 17. The University Of Adelaide 18. The University Of Melbourne 7. Queen'S University 19. The University Of New South Wales (UNSW) 8. Simon Fraser University 20. The University Of Queensland (UQ) 9. The University Of Western Ontario 21. The University Of Sydney 10.
    [Show full text]
  • Global University Rankings
    Global University Rankings: An Overview CONTENTS 1. Introduction 2. Rankings Overview 3. Other Rankings 4. Rankings Methodologies & Results First Published i. US News & World Report 1985 ii. CHE (CHE Centre for Higher Education Development) 1998 iii. Academic Ranking of World Universities (ARWU) (Shanghai Jiao Tong) 2003 iv. QS World University Rankings® (Quacquarelli Symonds) 2004 v. Webometrics* Ranking Web of World Universities (Cybermetrics Lab) 2004 vi. 4icu*.org University Web Ranking 2005 vii. HEEACT (Higher Education Evaluation and Accreditation Council of Taiwan) 2007 viii. Mines ParisTech* 2007 ix. Leiden (Centre for Science and Technology Studies, Leiden University) 2007 x. Global Universities Ranking (Independent Rating Agency RatER) 2009 xi. SCImago Institutions Rankings (SIR) 2009 xii. Times Higher Education 2010 xiii. High Impact University (University of Western Australia) 2010 *Non-academic rankings INTRODUCTION International university rankings are a comparatively recent phenomenon, with the first such exercise emerging in 2003. Rankings of international business schools, such as those published in the Financial Times or Business Week, have been with us for some time. However, the notion of comparing universities comprehensively on an international scale first emerged from Shanghai Jiao Tong University, with its Academic Ranking of World Universities in 2003, and from QS, with the THE-QS World University Rankings in 2004. Domestic rankings have been part of the higher education landscape for many years, with US News & World Report’s ‗America‘s Best Colleges‘ report being one of the first, emerging in 1983. However, that very landscape is being transformed by the onward march of globalisation, with international student mobility serving as a key indicator of change.
    [Show full text]
  • QS World University Rankings
    QS World University Rankings QS World University Rankings is an annual publication of university rankings by Quacquarelli Symonds (QS). The QS system comprises QS WORLD UNIVERSITY of three parts: the global overall ranking, the subject rankings, which RANKING name the world's top universities for the study of 51 different subjects and five composite faculty areas, as well as five independent regional tables, namely Asia, Latin America, Emerging Europe and Central Asia, the Arab Region, and BRICS.[1] Editor Ben Sowter (Head of The QS ranking receives approval from the International Ranking Research) Expert Group (IREG),[2] and is viewed as one of the three most- Staff Craig O'Callaghan widely read university rankings in the world, along with Academic Ranking of World Universities and Times Higher Education World writers University Rankings.[3][4][5][6] According to Alexa Internet, it is the Categories Higher education [7] most widely viewed university ranking worldwide. However, it has Frequency Annual been criticized for its overreliance on subjective indicators and reputation surveys, which tend to fluctuate over the Publisher Quacquarelli Symonds years.[8][9][10][11][12] Concern also exists regarding the global Limited consistency and integrity of the data used to generate QS ranking First issue 2004 (in partnership [9][13][14][15] results. with THE) 2010 (on its own) The QS ranking was previously known as Times Higher Education– QS World University Rankings. The publisher had collaborated with Country United Kingdom Times Higher Education (THE) magazine to publish its international Language English league tables from 2004 to 2009 before both started to announce their Website www.topuniversities own versions.
    [Show full text]