DOCSLIB.ORG

2Fb28c825b6e45896db2ebd99d

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

TABLE OF CONTENTS Message from the Chairman 1 Foreword from the Board of Directors 2 Foreword from the Executive Director 3 Democracy 4 ASEAN Studies Program 13 International Scholars Series 27 Energy Reform Program 29 Visits 32 Peace and Development 35 (National Violence Monitoring System) 2015 Publications 36 People Behind The Center 39 Text: A. Ibrahim Al Muttaqi and Mila Octaviani Copy Editor: A. Ibrahim Al Muttaqi Lay Out and Design: Rahma Simamora ©The Habibie Center 2015 Message from the Chairman 2015 was a significant year for Democracy in the region also still goes Indonesia with the Commemoration not have a strong foothold. Globaly, of the 60th Anniversary of the Asian the Saudi Arabia-Iran tensions, the African Conference and the launching ongoing Korean Peninsula dispute, of the ASEAN Community. This and the threat of ISIS overshadows moment will hopefully bring Indonesia the peace and stability of the region. to another level of international In addition to these are the unresolved cooperation. Furthermore, 2015 South China Sea issues and the also saw the latest development matter of Palestinian independence. in our democracy. As we know, we While Indonesia has publicly stated successfully held simultaneous its commitment to play its part in regional elections. Indeed, this is a resolving these problems, it remains very opportune time for the people of to be seen what contributions we can Indonesia to control the direction of make for a more peaceful world. their country for the sake of their own In this connection, The Habibie future. Center is committed to be part of the Nevertheless we still have a lot of solution. By undertaking activities homework in 2016. Domesticaly, it that addresses the aforementioned would seem that political parties still and other related issues, The Habibie leave a lot to be desired regarding Center will be once again at the their function as the representation of forefront in pushing the agenda of the Indonesian people in the political democracy, human rights and social system. Moreover, the Rupiah will still justice. For this, my sincerest gratitude be under pressure especially by the goes to all those who have helped The global economic slowdown. Regionaly, Habibie Center in its endeavours. the implementation of ASEAN Community raise many concern of our readiness. There are issues that ASEAN is not able to solve such as Bacharuddin Jusuf Habibie ethnic conflicts in Myanmar and the subsequent Rohingya refugee crisis. Message from the Chairman | The Habibie Center Activity Report 2015 1 Message from the Board of Directors I am pleased to present the 2015 under the belief that we are making annual report of The Habibie Center. a difference; that democracy should As I reflect on the past year with this always be the cornerstone of the life organization, I am truly delighted. of our people. The Habibie Center Each year, The Habibie Center has has also built partnerships with grown from strength to strength. We other institutions, from Indonesia have not only been active in promoting and abroad, to strengthen our democratization and human rights efforts and spread the messages of in Indonesia, but also beyond our democratization and human rights. borders. I believe that the aforementioned Indonesia has progressed significantly topics and other related issues as it has become one of the leading covered by The Habibie Center democratic countries in South East have contributed to Indonesia’s Asia. In recent times, the Indonesian democratization. I truly appreciate people has shown their determination the great work of The Habibie and resilience. We have directly elected Center’s staff and the contributions of our local leaders simultaneously. We our partners. have also weathered terrorist attack in the heart of our capital. During the year, The Habibie Center conducted research and seminars to further promote democratization in Indonesia. Our team works hard Ahmad Watik Pratiknya 2 Message from the Board of Directors | The Habibie Center Activity Report 2015 Foreword Executive Director Looking back over 2015 I am deeply seminar “Encouraging Roles of proud of the many achievements of Women Legislators in Bicameral The Habibie Center in advancing our Reinforcement”, public discussion primary principles of democracy and on “Simultaneous Regional Election”, human rights in Indonesia. Through World Forum for Muslim Democrats, our core activities of research, program Talking ASEAN on “ASEAN as an Actor implementation and policy advocacy, in International Forums : Reality, The Habibie Center once again showed Potential and Constrains”, Talking its relevance in not only being part of ASEAN on “ASEAN’s Response to the the discourse, but also in creating and Rohingya Migrant Crisis”, “Relocation shaping them. This annual report is of Fuel Subsidy and Sustainable Energy a testiment to The Habibie Center’s Development”, “Democracy, Violence response to the key issues that affected and Peace Development in Post- Indonesia and the wider region in Conflict Area in Indonesia ”, “Launching 2015. of Violence Intensity Index” and so on. Taking the stand that every issue falls To end, i would like to express my under the umbrella of democracy and sincerest gratitude to The Habibie human rights, The Habibie Center Center’s staff, partners and supporters was unafraid to address a wide-range for their hard work, dedication and of subjects including democracy, contribution over the past year. ASEAN, Peace and development through National Violence Monitoring System, energy reform, and build strong networking between NGOs. This is reflected in our activities such Rahimah Abdulrahim as : Quad-plus dialogue, national Foreword The Executive Director | The Habibie Center Activity Report 2015 3 Democracy Advancing Democratization Process in Indonesia Discussion “Overview 2014 and Outlook 2015” 2015 will not be an easy year for Joko Jakarta, 13 January 2015 Widodo - Jusuf Kalla administration. The lack of strong support towards Joko Widodo - Jusuf Kalla in the elite For academics, The New Year holds level is further worsened by the lack a special place for critical reflection. of ability to conduct lobby and political The start of a new year provides an communication. Meanwhile, in terms of opportunity to look back and critically foreign policy, Joko Widodo - Jusuf Kalla assess important issues that have administration is also facing possible surfaced in the previous years, as well as problems as they are projecting the to assess the potentials and challenges impression of an inward looking that will come for the year ahead. In administration. In the economic area, politics, Indonesia in 2014 witnessed 2014 has been a challenging year. The a political turbulence happening Rupiah has become very volatile due around election. While the current to several factors, such as the rise of political condition might change in the political tension after the presidential future, it can be safely assumed that elections. The Indonesian government 4 Democracy | The Habibie Center Activity Report 2015 Asia-Pacific Security Program at the Center for a New American Security will face another challenge in 2015. and Industry; Counter Terrorism/ (CNAS); Renato Cruz De Castro, one of which is The Fed’s policy to raise Extremism Cooperation; Diplomatic Albert Del Rosario (ADR) Institute for its interest rate as the US economy Coordination, Issues and Venues; and Strategic and International Studies starts to recover. Based on these Operationalizing Partnership. This and Professor, International Studies issues, The Habibie Center facilitated • dialogueAustralian featured: Strategic Policy Department, De La Salle University; a discussion on “2014 Review and Institute (ASPI): Andrew Davies, Manila Angel Rabasa, Senior 2015 Outlook” The objectives of these Director, Research/Senior Analyst, Political Scientist, RAND Corporation. issues were: to review government’s Defence Capability; Mark Thomson, policy in terms of politics, economy, Senior Analyst, Defence Economics. • The Habibie Center: Dewi Fortuna and foreign policy in 2014: to identify Anwar Chair of the Institute for • The Heritage Foundation: James Democracy and Human Rights; internal and external challenges facing , Jay Carafano, Vice President, Foreign Rahimah Abdulrahim, Executive the government in 2015 in terms of and Defense Policy Studies; E. W. Director; Kusnanto Anggoro, politics, economy, and foreign policy; Richardso Fellow and Director; Lecturer in Strategic Intelligence at to elaborate government’s policy Kathryn and Shelby Cullom, Davis n, the National Defence University and in terms of politics, economy, and Institute for International Studies; University of Indonesia (Jakarta). foreign policy in 2015; to give possible Walter Lohman Director, Asian recommendation for the government Studies Center; Lisa Curtis Senior • The Tokyo Foundation: Masahiro , in terms of politics, economy, and Research Fellow, Asian Studies Akiyama, President of The Tokyo , foreign policy. Center; Patrick Cronin, Senior Foundation; Bonji Ohara. Advisor and Senior Director of the Quad Plus Dialogue Sofitel Bali Nusa Dua Beach Resort, 1-3 February 2015 “The Habibie Center, in collaboration with The Heritage Foundation, the Tokyo Foundation, Vivekananda International Foundation and Australian Strategic held the Quad-Plus Dialogue in Denpasar, Indonesia. The Quad-Plus Dialogue gathered prominent experts from Australia, India, Japan and the United States together with Indonesia to examine issues of
Recommended publications
  • AGENDA REV 5 1.Indd

    AGENDA REV 5 1.Indd

    DEWAN PERWAKILAN DAERAH REPUBLIK INDONESIA AGENDA KERJA DPD RI 2017 DATA PRIBADI Nama __________________________________________________________ No. Anggota ___________________________________________________ Alamat _________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________ Telepon/Fax ____________________________________________________ Nomor _________________________________________________________ KTP ____________________________________________________________ Paspor _________________________________________________________ Asuransi _______________________________________________________ Pajak Pendapatan ______________________________________________ SIM ____________________________________________________________ PBB ____________________________________________________________ Lain-lain _______________________________________________________ DATA BISNIS Kantor _________________________________________________________ Alamat _________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________ Telepon/Fax ____________________________________________________ Telex ___________________________________________________________ Lain-lain _______________________________________________________ NOMOR TELEPON PENTING Dokter/Dokter Gigi _____________________________________________ Biro Perjalanan _________________________________________________ Taksi ___________________________________________________________ Stasiun K.A
  • Lampiran 1 : Matriks Berita 1 : Kemelut Putri Mahkota SINTAKSIS

    Lampiran 1 : Matriks Berita 1 : Kemelut Putri Mahkota SINTAKSIS

    Lampiran 1 : Matriks Berita 1 : Kemelut Putri Mahkota SINTAKSIS Headline Lead Latar Informasi Kutipan Sumber Penutup Kemelut Putri Demi tahta Keraton Paragraf 1 – 4 : Paragraf 5 : Sehubungan dengan konflik Mahkota untuk Mangkubumi, Pemberian gelar “Tadinya Pembayun tidak pemberian gelar Sri Sultan bahkan Mangkubumi kepada masalah, tapi setelah ada Mangkubumi pada dirinya, Kemelut (KBBI) = menjual harta keraton Pembayun menyebabkan sabda raja, kami ada batas.” Pembayun memilih untuk keadaan yang genting walau hal tersebut beberapa aktivitasnya tidak berbicara apa – apa atau berbahaya. ditentang oleh menjadi terganggu dan Yudhaningrat, adik tiri Sri dengan alasan bahwa ini sebagian anggota membuat ia hubungannya Sultan. belum waktunya bagi dia keluarga keraton. dengan orang – orang untuk berbicara. sekitar semakin terbatasi. Paragraf 5 & 6 : Paragraf 11 : Sri Sultan mengeluarkan “Saya gemeteran sampai dua dawuh (sabda), tidak lihat Ngarso Dalem pemberian gelar sudah jalan turun. Dua hari Mangkubumi kepada saya tidak bisa tidur,” Pembayun serta akunya (Pembayun). 113 penggantian namanya. Kedua dawuh tersebut menyebabkan polemik. Paragraf 7 : Paragraf 12: Gelar Mangkubumi yang Ia (Pembayun) merasa nama disandang Pembayun Mangkubumi sangat berat menyebabkan konflik karena bermakna pemangku tahta keraton. adat kekuasaan. Paragraf 8 – 11 : Paragraf 13: Pemberian gelar tersebut Ia (Siti Sutiyah) mengaku membuat Pembayun semua penari pun tidak merasa terbeban dan selalu hadir, yang penting tertekan. mereka menekuni tarian dengan latihan sendiri. Paragraf 12 & 13 : Paragraf 14 : Gelar Mangkubumi “H-1 dan H-2 itu datang. bukanlah alasan mengapa Kalau beberapa hari Pembayun menghadiri itu memang sempat tidak latihan. rawuh (datang). Tapi, 114 menjelang pentas, tetap datang kok,” jelasnya. Paragraf 14 – 16 : Paragraf 17 : Prosesi Pemberian gelar “Itu memang kursi putri Mangkubumi pada mahkota itu.
  • Indonesia's Regional Representative Assembly

    Indonesia's Regional Representative Assembly

    Indonesia’s Regional Representative Assembly: Democracy, Representation and the Regions A report on the Dewan Perwakilan Daerah (DPD) Stephen Sherlock Centre for Democratic Institutions July 2005 About the Author ............................................................................................................ 3 About the Centre for Democratic Institutions .......................................................... 3 Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 4 What is the DPD?............................................................................................................ 6 Constitutional role and powers....................................................................................... 6 An advisory body not an upper house ............................................................................ 8 An assembly for the regions.......................................................................................... 10 Structure of the DPD ................................................................................................... 10 Leadership of the DPD.......................................................................................... 11 Ad‐Hoc Committees.............................................................................................. 12 Steering Committee ............................................................................................... 12 Legislation Committee .........................................................................................
  • Mapping Status and Roles of Javanese Women in Indonesian Literary Texts

    Mapping Status and Roles of Javanese Women in Indonesian Literary Texts

    PEMETAAN STATUS DAN PERAN PEREMPUAN JAWA DALAM TEKS SASTRA INDONESIA MAPPING STATUS AND ROLES OF JAVANESE WOMEN IN INDONESIAN LITERARY TEXTS Esti Ismawati Program Pascasarjana Universitas Widya Dharma Klaten [email protected] Abstract Status and roles of Javanese women in Indonesian literary text has been written in the form of short stories, novels, and romances, as seen in Umar Kayam, YB Mangunwijaya, Arswendo Atmowiloto, Nh Dini, and Ahmad Tohari, but until now no one has diccussed it scientifically. This paper describes status and roles of Javanese women in Indonesian literary texts from the colonial era, independence era, today’s era, and Javanese women in reality, because the literary texts are the reflection of the society. Are there changes within the status and roles of Javanese women in Indonesian literary texts and in the reality? The methods used in this research are descriptive method for the Javanese women in literary texts and survey for the Javanese women in the reality. The techniques used are bibliography technic (reading appreciation) for literary text and indepth interview and questionnaire. It can be concluded that the status and roles of Javanese women in Indonesian literary texts and in the reality changes from era to era. The changes includemindset and lifestyle change. There is no difference between the status and roles of Javanese women in Indonesian literary texts and in the reality. Keywords: Javanese women, status, roles, literary texts, reality Abstrak Status dan peran perempuan Jawa dalam teks sastra Indonesia telah banyak ditulis dalam bentuk cerpen, novel, dan roman, sebagaimana tampak dalam karya Umar Kayam, YB Mangunwijaya, Arswendo Atmowiloto, Nh Dini, dan Ahmad Tohari.
  • 73 Suksesi Kepemimpinan Kraton Ngayogyakarta Dalam Dualitas Struktur

    73 Suksesi Kepemimpinan Kraton Ngayogyakarta Dalam Dualitas Struktur

    Wahyuni Choiriyati, Suksesi Kepemimpinan Kraton Ngayogyakarta Dalam Dualitas Struktur 73 Suksesi Kepemimpinan Kraton Ngayogyakarta dalam Dualitas Struktur Wahyuni Choiriyati Dosen Fakultas Ilmu Komunikasi Universitas Gunadarma Jalan Margonda Raya No. 100 Depok 16424, Jawa Barat, Indonesia. Email: [email protected] Abstract King declaration was delivered by Sultan Hamengkubuwono X exposing his princess for next in order to be crowned in Yogyakarta’s palace.This raised contentious among Sultan Hamengkubuwono and his brothers. This was wrapped in cultural communication practicess in high level of context that was not easy to understand especially for society in general. This writing is to focus signifying king declaration in society in line to deep structure and culture. By phenomenology approach with critical paradigm, data gathered by in depth interviews and observation. Results of research found that king decralation was perceived as high context communication practices. This tended to economic political nuances. Nowdays, King has not dedicated to serve the society yet, but he tended to want to be respected. Power structure was maintained to secure the power legitimation including reveneu of land taxes and royal familiy businesses in palace. Each of them played the significant roles to secure and maintain in inner cirlce of power in the palace. Keywords: succession of leadership, structure, power, culture and communication Abstrak Sabdaraja yang disampaikan oleh Sultan Hamengkubuwono X mengungkapkan bahwa putri sulungnya akan diangkat menjadi penerus tahta kraton Yogyakarta. Hal ini menimbulkan ketegangan antara sultan Hamengkubuwono X dengan adik-adiknya. Semua ini dikemas dalam praktik komunikasi budaya konteks tinggi yang tidak mudah diterjemahkan masyarakat awam. Fokus tulisan ini adalah menggambarkan pemakanaan masyarakat Yogyakarta terkait sabdaraja dan segala hal yang berkaitan dengan struktur kekuasaan dan budaya yang melingkupinya.
  • Pro Dan Kontra Wacana Raja Perempuan Di Kraton Yogyakarta

    Pro Dan Kontra Wacana Raja Perempuan Di Kraton Yogyakarta

    Pro dan Kontra Wacana Raja Perempuan di Kraton Yogyakarta Umi Suryaningtyas1 ABSTRAK Sabda Raja yang dilontarkan oleh Sultan Hamengku Buwono X menimbulkan pro dan kontra. Perdebatan ini terjadi akibat adanya perbedaan mengenai siapa yang pantas menjadi Raja pengganti Sultan Hamengku Buwono X. Penelitian ini mengulas mengenai pro dan kontra yang ada di internal Kraton dan beberapa pendapat masyarakat Yogyakarta. Michel Foucault menjelaskan bahwa wacana berkaitan dengan kuasa dan pengetahuan. Wacana merupakan tanda- tanda akan diproduksinya sesuatu yang baru. Selain itu, Foucault juga menjelaskan mengenai genealogy kekuasaan, dimana kuasa bekerja di dalam tubuh dan pemikiran manusia sehingga terdapat pemikiran bahwa kuasa itu benar. Pembacaan ini digunakan dalam memahami Sabda Raja Sultan Hamengku Buwono X tahun 2015. Dengan menggunakan metode kualitatif- deskriptif, penelitian ini menemukan bahwa adanya rezim kebenaran yang dimiliki oleh kedua pihak. Pihak pro dan kontra sama-sama memiliki pengetahuan yang memandang bahwa kuasa itu benar. Sehingga, pro dan kontra mengenai wacana Raja Perempuan lewat sabda Raja ini memiliki wacana dominan dan marginal bukan masalah benar dan tidak benar. Selanjutnya, dalam genealogy kekuasaan Foucault menjelaskan bahwa sabda Raja ini merupakan cara untuk mempengaruhi pemikiran mengenai adanya perubahan kuasa. Kata kunci : Wacana, relasi kekuasaan, pengetahuan, genealogy Abstract The “Sabda Raja” by the Sultan hamengku Buwono X raises the pros and cons. This debate because there are difference of who is good at becoming King replacement Sultan Hamengku Buwono X. This research about pros and cons in internal Kraton and some perspective from civil society. Michel Foucoult explain that discours relates to power and knowledge. Discourse is a sign of something to new produce.
  • Bab Iii Intrik-Intrik Di Dalam Kraton : 1881 – 1913

    Bab Iii Intrik-Intrik Di Dalam Kraton : 1881 – 1913

    BAB III INTRIK-INTRIK DI DALAM KRATON : 1881 – 1913 Proses intervensi penguasa kolonial Belanda terhadap Kesultanan Yogyakarta bukan hanya terbatas pada institusi resmi, yaitu bidang hukum, politik, dan sosial ekonomi. Pengaruh dan campur tangan kolonial terhadap kerajaan ini juga sangat besar dalam kehidupan elit politik di kraton, bahkan di kalangan kerabat dan keluarga Sultan Hamengku Buwono VII. Peluang ini menjadi terbuka ketika Sultan HB VII terikat dengan kontrak-kontrak politik yang dibuat olehnya dengan Belanda. Selain itu juga sistem kekuasaan yang berlaku di kalangan raja-raja Jawa memungkinkan hal itu terjadi. Hal ini tampak dengan berlakunya struktur pemerintahan raja-raja Jawa, yang mana para raja menempatkan para anggota kerabat dan keluarga dekatnya pada posisi-posisi yang strategis dalam pemerintahan. Struktur demikian ini memiliki dampak yang luas pada kehidupan politik bukan hanya di kalangan kraton dan elit penguasa tetapi juga pada seluruh sistem kekuasaan di Kesultanan Yogyakarta dan kawulanya. Hal tersebut bertolak dari kenyataan bahwa jabatan-jabatan penting yang dipegang oleh kerabat raja (sentana dalem) memberikan lingkaran pembatas yang memisahkan elit penguasa dengan raja sebagai sentral kekuasaan. Di samping itu sistem penggajian para pejabat tinggi ini dengan tanah (sistem apanage) juga menciptakan hubungan patron-klien dengan rakyat yang didasarkan pada sistem perabdian feodal (ikatan vertikal). Akibatnya, dalam kehidupan sosial politik Kesultanan Yogyakarta, setidaknya selama pemerintahan Sultan Hamengku Buwono VII, peranan rakyat dalam percaturan politik di kraton sangat kecil.100 100Hal ini agak berbeda dengan sistem yang berlaku di Kesunanan Surakarta pada masa yang sama, yaitu di bawah pemerintahan Sunan Pakubuwono X (1893-1939). Pada masa pemerintahannya, Sunan sering melakukan pendekatan pada kalangan masyarakat seperti Tirtoadisuryo, wartawan yang kemudian menjadi tokoh Sarekat Islam, serta kalangan pengusaha pribumi di Laweyan.
  • Keraton Yogyakarta Masa Lampau Dan Masa Kini: Dinamika Suksesi Raja-Raja Jawa Dan Politik Wacana “Raja Perempuan”

    Keraton Yogyakarta Masa Lampau Dan Masa Kini: Dinamika Suksesi Raja-Raja Jawa Dan Politik Wacana “Raja Perempuan”

    Indonesian Historical Studies, Vol. 3, No. 1, 44-57 © 2019 Keraton Yogyakarta Masa Lampau dan Masa Kini: Dinamika Suksesi Raja-Raja Jawa dan Politik Wacana “Raja Perempuan” Ilmiawati Safitri Program Studi S2 Ilmu Sejarah, Fakultas Ilmu Budaya, Universitas Gadjah Mada Alamat korespondensi: [email protected] Abstract This article presents the dynamics of the succession of the king's regime in the Yogyakarta palace, which entered the crisis period because of the absence of successors to the male king. The emergence of the queen discourse that echoed at the Yogyakarta palace since 2010. It has sparked new tensions for the relatives of the palace. This discussion continues to grow. The words of the king echoed by Sultan Hamengku Buwono (HB) X under the pretext of gender became political ambition to perpetuate power. This study used the historical method to answer the problems that in every change of regimes in the Sultan Palace, Yogyakarta was always followed by conflicts over the throne and tug of war which affected the people outside the palace, such as when Islamic Mataram broke into four kingdoms. At that time, the community took part in regional warfare. This impact arose because of the desires of every descendant of the king, who feels entitled to become the next king. Diterima/ Received: Keywords: Yogyakarta Palace; King Successions; Sultan HB X; Queen. 11 Mei 2019 Abstrak Disetujui/ Accepted: 4 Juli 2019 Artikel ini menganalisis dinamika suksesi kepemimpinan raja di Keraton Yogyakarta yang masuk pada masa krisis karena ketiadaan penerus raja laki-laki. Kemunculan wacana “raja perempuan” yang menggema di Keraton Yogyakarta sejak 2010 memantik ketegangan baru bagi kerabat keraton.
  • Analisis Penyelesian Sengketa Internal Lembaga Negara (Studi Kasus Pelantikan Pimpinan Dewan Perwakilan Daerah Republik Indonesia Periode 2017-2019)

    Analisis Penyelesian Sengketa Internal Lembaga Negara (Studi Kasus Pelantikan Pimpinan Dewan Perwakilan Daerah Republik Indonesia Periode 2017-2019)

    Yanzah Bagas Nugraha & Dwi Andayani Budisetyowati Analisis Penyelesaian Sengketa Internal lembaga Negara (Studi Kasus Pelantikan Pimpinan Dewan Perwakilan Daerah Republik Indonesia Periode 2017-2019) ANALISIS PENYELESIAN SENGKETA INTERNAL LEMBAGA NEGARA (STUDI KASUS PELANTIKAN PIMPINAN DEWAN PERWAKILAN DAERAH REPUBLIK INDONESIA PERIODE 2017-2019) Yanzah Bagas Nugraha (Mahasiswa Program S1 Fakultas Hukum Universitas Tarumanagara) (Email: [email protected]) Dwi Andayani Budisetyowati (Corresponding Author) (Dosen Hukum Tata Negara Fakultas Hukum Universitas Tarumanagara. Meraih Gelar Sarjana Hukum Dari Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada, Gelar Magister Hukum Dari Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia, Gelar Doktor Hukum Dari Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia) Abstract The establishment of the Regional Representative Council of the Republic of Indonesia so called Dewan Perwakilan Daerah (DPD-RI) at least has two objectives. The first is to enhance justice for the people in the region. Secondly, to expanding and increasing the participation of local communities in national life. The process to form this state institution is done by amending the 3rd amendment of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic Indonesia. However, in doing that amendment there was an internal conflict within the body of DPD-RI involving the old and the new leaders of this institution last year. The length of leadership tenure which was initially made 5 years was amended to became 2.5 years. The different length of leadership tenure was then canceled by the Supreme Court and it was decided to be the same as other institution such as The People’s Consultative Assembly and The House of Representative in that the leadership tenure should be in accordance with the electoral cycle of 5 years.
  • Risalah Sidang Perkara Nomor 88/Puu-Xiv/2016

    Risalah Sidang Perkara Nomor 88/Puu-Xiv/2016

    MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI REPUBLIK INDONESIA --------------------- RISALAH SIDANG PERKARA NOMOR 88/PUU-XIV/2016 PERIHAL PENGUJIAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 13 TAHUN 2012 TENTANG KEISTIMEWAAN DAERAH ISTIMEWA YOGYAKARTA TERHADAP UNDANG-UNDANG DASAR NEGARA REPUBLIK INDONESIA TAHUN 1945 ACARA MENDENGARKAN KETERANGAN DPR DAN AHLI/SAKSI (IX) J A K A R T A SELASA, 21 FEBRUARI 2017 MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI REPUBLIK INDONESIA -------------- RISALAH SIDANG PERKARA NOMOR 88/PUU-XIV/2016 PERIHAL Pengujian Undang-Undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2012 tentang Keistimewaan Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta [Pasal 18 ayat (1) huruf m] terhadap Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945 PEMOHON 1. Raden Mas Adwin Suryo Satrianto 2. Supriyanto 3. Anggiastri Hanantyasari Utami, dkk. ACARA Mendengarkan Keterangan DPR dan Ahli/Saksi (IX) Selasa, 21 Februari 2017 Pukul 09.40 – 11.40 WIB Ruang Sidang Gedung Mahkamah Konstitusi RI, Jl. Medan Merdeka Barat No. 6, Jakarta Pusat SUSUNAN PERSIDANGAN 1) Arief Hidayat (Ketua) 2) Anwar Usman (Anggota) 3) Aswanto (Anggota) 4) I Dewa Gede Palguna (Anggota) 5) Manahan MP Sitompul (Anggota) 6) Suhartoyo (Anggota) 7) Wahiduddin Adams (Anggota) 8) Maria Farida Indrati (Anggota) Hani Adhani Panitera Pengganti i Pihak yang Hadir: A. Pemohon: 1. Ninuk Sumaryani Widyantoro 2. Raden Mas Adwin Suryo Satrianto 3. Saparinah Sadli 4. Anggiastri Hanantyasari Utami 5. Siti Nia Nurhasanah 6. Sjamsiah Achmad B. Kuasa Hukum Pemohon: 1. Irmanputra Sidin 2. Iqbal Tawakal Pasaribu 3. Agustjar 4. Alungsyah 5. Victor Santoso Tandiasa C. Pemerintah: 1. Fitri Nur Astari 2. R. Toni Prayogo 3. Maretta D. DPD: 1. Gusti Kanjeng Ratu (GKR) Hemas E. Pihak Terkait Langsung: 1. Sri Sultan Hamengku Buwono X F. Kuasa Hukum Pihak Terkait Tidak Langsung: 1.

  • Risalah Sidang Perkara Nomor 88/Puu-Xiv/2016

    MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI REPUBLIK INDONESIA --------------------- RISALAH SIDANG PERKARA NOMOR 88/PUU-XIV/2016 PERIHAL PENGUJIAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 13 TAHUN 2012 TENTANG KEISTIMEWAAN DAERAH ISTIMEWA YOGYAKARTA TERHADAP UNDANG-UNDANG DASAR NEGARA REPUBLIK INDONESIA TAHUN 1945 ACARA MENDENGARKAN KETERANGAN DPR, AHLI DPD, DAN AHLI PBNU (VIII) J A K A R T A RABU, 8 FEBRUARI 2017 MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI REPUBLIK INDONESIA -------------- RISALAH SIDANG PERKARA NOMOR 88/PUU-XIV/2016 PERIHAL Pengujian Undang-Undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2012 tentang Keistimewaan Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta [Pasal 18 ayat (1) huruf m] terhadap Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945 PEMOHON 1. Raden Mas Adwin Suryo Satrianto 2. Supriyanto 3. Anggiastri Hanantyasari Utami, dkk ACARA Mendengarkan Keterangan DPR, Ahli DPD, dan Ahli PBNU (VIII) Rabu, 8 Februari 2017 Pukul 11.12 – 13.41 WIB Ruang Sidang Gedung Mahkamah Konstitusi RI, Jl. Medan Merdeka Barat No. 6, Jakarta Pusat SUSUNAN PERSIDANGAN 1) Arief Hidayat (Ketua) 2) Aswanto (Anggota) 3) I Dewa Gede Palguna (Anggota) 4) Manahan MP Sitompul (Anggota) 5) Suhartoyo (Anggota) 6) Wahiduddin Adams (Anggota) 7) Maria Farida Indrati (Anggota) Hani Adhani Panitera Pengganti i Pihak yang Hadir: A. Pemohon: 1. Ninuk Sumaryani Widyantoro 2. Raden Mas Adwin Suryo Satrianto 3. Bambang Prajitno Soeroso 4. Anggiastri Hanantyasari Utami B. Kuasa Hukum Pemohon: 1. Irmanputra Sidin 2. Iqbal Tawakal Pasaribu 3. Agustjar 4. Alungsyah 5. Victor Santoso Tandiasa C. Pemerintah: 1. Hotman Sitorus 2. Wahyu Jaya 3. Surdiyanto D. DPD: 1. Intsiawati Ayus 2. Gusti Kanjeng Ratu Hemas E. Ahli dari DPD: 1. Aan Eko Widiarto 2. Marzuki Wahid F. Pihak Terkait: 1. Adjie Bantjono (PBNU) 2.

  • Keraton Jawa 1755 - 1989

    KRONIK SUKSESI KERATON JAWA 1755 - 1989 KRONIK SUKSESI KERATON JAWA 1755 - 1989 SUSILO HARJONO KRONIK SUKSESI KERATON JAWA 1755 - 1989 Susilo Harjono Hak Cipta dilindungi Undang-Undang All Right Reserved Penulis: Susilo Harjono Kata Pengantar: Penerbit Editor: Wigke Capri Arti Sampul dan Tata Letak: Oryza Irwanto Research Centre for Politics and Goverment Jurusan Politik dan Pemerintahan Universitas Gadjah Mada Jl. Socio Yusticia 2 Bulaksumur, Yogyakarta 55281 www.jpp.fisipol.ugm.ac.id email: [email protected] Telp: +62 274 563365 ext.212 164 + xvii halaman 140 x 210 mm ISBN 978-602-96762-8-0 Kronik Suksesi Keraton Jawa 1755 - 1989 Daftar Isi Daftar isi ............................................................................ v Daftar Gambar ................................................................ ix Daftar Tabel .................................................................... x Daftar Diagram ............................................................. xi Kata Pengantar .............................................................. xiii Dari Penulis .................................................................... xv Melacak Pola Suksesi Raja-Raja Jogja ........................ 1 Ada Apa Dengan Suksesi Kraton Jogja? ................. 1 Ngumpulake Balung Pisah: Narasi Ilmiah Peta Suksesi Di Kraton Jogja ............................................ 5 Panca Warna Pola Suksesi Raja Jogja ..................... 13 Wajah Politik Tahta Jogja ........................................... 14 Pergeseran Kekuasaan Pasca Traktat