DOCSLIB.ORG

Indonesia's Regional Representative Assembly

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Indonesia's Regional Representative Assembly Indonesia’s Regional Representative Assembly: Democracy, Representation and the Regions A report on the Dewan Perwakilan Daerah (DPD) Stephen Sherlock Centre for Democratic Institutions July 2005 About the Author ............................................................................................................ 3 About the Centre for Democratic Institutions .......................................................... 3 Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 4 What is the DPD?............................................................................................................ 6 Constitutional role and powers....................................................................................... 6 An advisory body not an upper house ............................................................................ 8 An assembly for the regions.......................................................................................... 10 Structure of the DPD ................................................................................................... 10 Leadership of the DPD.......................................................................................... 11 Ad‐Hoc Committees.............................................................................................. 12 Steering Committee ............................................................................................... 12 Legislation Committee .......................................................................................... 13 House Affairs Committee ..................................................................................... 14 Committee for Inter‐institutional Cooperation ................................................. 14 Ethics Council......................................................................................................... 14 Secretariat of the DPD.................................................................................................. 15 Who are the Members of the DPD?.............................................................................. 16 Paths to power............................................................................................................... 19 Social and Occupational Backgrounds of DPD Members............................................ 20 The DPD electoral system: how representative?.......................................................... 24 Representation and “politics”....................................................................................... 27 Representation in the SNTV electoral system .............................................................. 29 Work in progress?: The first year of the DPD.............................................................. 31 Making a non‐party assembly work ............................................................................. 36 Conclusion......................................................................................................................39 Appendix: DPD Members, Provinces & Votes ....................................................... 44 2 About the Author Stephen Sherlock is an Associate at the Centre for Democratic Institutions and a political analyst and development consultant, specialising in Indonesia and South and Southeast Asia. He worked for eleven years as an analyst and policy adviser on Indonesia and East Timor in the Australian Parliament and now divides his time between Indonesia and Australia, as a consultant on governance and political change. Email: [email protected] About the Centre for Democratic Institutions CDI was established in 1998 to assist in the development and strengthening of democratic institutions in developing countries. Its mission is to harness Australian and international best practice in support of developing countries’ needs for democratic governance. CDI’s work combines technical assistance and capacity building programs, networking, and interpersonal and knowledge exchange, including the dissemination of CDI’s original research on democracy and its institutions. Its focus countries comprise Indonesia and Timor‐Leste in South East Asia and Papua New Guinea, Fiji, Solomon Islands and Vanuatu in Melanesia. Centre for Democratic Institutions Research School of Social Sciences Australian National University Canberra ACT 0200 Australia Phone: 61 2 6125 3197 Fax: 61 2 6125 9726 Email: [email protected] Website: www.cdi.anu.edu.au 3 Introduction The Indonesian state has been in a process of transformation since the fall of the Suharto regime in 1998. The first wave of reform under the unelected Habibie government of 1998‐99 saw the removal of restrictions on civil rights such as freedom of speech, association and assembly, the creation of a range of new political parties and organisations and the country’s first democratic election in over 40 years in June 1999. The movement of the parliament (DPR1) back into the centre stage of political life and the subsequent election of a new President then led to a series of constitutional reforms that were completed in 2003. The constitutional reforms strengthened the powers of the parliament and eliminated most of the powers of the previously powerful quasi‐legislative body, the MPR.2 The power to elect the President was removed from the MPR and was placed in the hands of the people through direct election. In addition, a new assembly, the Dewan Perwakilan Daerah (DPD) or Regional Representative Assembly/Council was created with the intention of increasing the role of the regions in making laws. As a new representative assembly with some quite unusual features, the DPD has not yet been analysed in any detail. This study provides an introduction to the structure and operation of the DPD and examines some of the key issues that have emerged in discussion and debate about the DPD in its early formative period. The study considers certain questions about whether the DPD is as representative of the regions as its proponents would claim, whether it has provided a new entry point for regional aspirations into political and policy debate and what problems the DPD faces in attempting to define a role for itself in the future of Indonesian politics. The DPD grew out of the view that Indonesia’s regions should have a greater role in policy‐making at the national level and that that role should be played by a second chamber of the central parliament. The argument developed in this paper, however, is that the DPD has not yet shown that it can actually provide significant input into the national legislative process or act as voice of the regions. The major problem is that the DPD is only an advisory body and its areas of responsibility are quite limited and, as yet, ill‐defined. Efforts by DPD Members to increase their powers have become a major preoccupation for the assembly and have arguably diverted its attention from the more immediate task 1 Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat (DPR) – People’s Representative Assembly. 2 Majelis Permusyawaratan Rakyat (MPR) – People’s Consultative Council. 4 of demonstrating that it can effectively use the powers it already has. Critical issues such as the definition and extent of the DPD’s powers and how the assembly should interact with the legislative deliberations of the DPR have not been seriously considered and have been dealt with on an ad‐hoc basis. The result is that the DPD’s only notable achievement to date is being what its leaders have called an “ombudsman” or a “post office”, gathering grievances and petitions amongst governmental and private institutions and individuals in the regions. The structure of the DPD is modelled on the DPR, but it is questionable whether the internal organisational arrangements that are appropriate for the DPR are actually the best for a very different body like the DPD. DPD Members are elected as individuals and are not permitted to be sponsored by political parties. Despite concerns that political parties would attempt to take over and control the DPD through indirect means, it appears that there has not been any major organised forays into the assembly by the parties. A possible exception is that of Golkar, whose members and ex‐members are prominent in the DPD. This does not seem, however, to be the result of a concerted effort by the party, but instead is a reflection of the fact that the majority of people with governmental and political experience in Indonesia have had some connections with Golkar in the past. The DPD has become an alternative path through which former political operators from the New Order have been able to recreate themselves in the democratic environment and protect themselves from challenges to their influential status. Apart from people with a background in the New Order, the DPD is also composed of other identifiable kinds of individuals. The large number of businesspeople elected to the DPD suggests that the assembly has become a means by which independently wealthy people can win a national office without depending on the support of political party. There is also a clearly identifiable pattern for local figures with traditional sources of status and influence to win a place in the DPD. Regions with strong localised support for religious organisations like NU, Muhammadiyah or the churches have tended to elect individuals with these backgrounds to the DPD. The election results also show that it is a major advantage to be known in
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Komisi Konstitusi Ke-1
    DEWAN PERWAKILAN DAERAH REPUBLIK INDONESIA ----------- RISALAH SIDANG PARIPURNA KE-7 DPD RI MASA SIDANG I TAHUN SIDANG 2014 – 2015 I. KETERANGAN 1. Hari : Jumat 2. Tanggal : 5 Desember 2014 3. Waktu : 13:34:27 WIB – 16:16:19 WIB 4. Tempat : R. Rapat Nusantara V 5. Pimpinan Sidang : 1. H. Irman Gusman, SE., MBA (Ketua DPD RI) 2. GKR Hemas (Wakil Ketua DPD RI) 3. Prof. Dr. Farouk Muhammad (Wakil Ketua DPD RI) 6. Sekretaris Sidang : 1. Prof. Dr. Sudarsono Hardjosoekarto (Sekretaris Jenderal DPD RI) 2. Zul Evi Astar, S.H. (Wakil Sekretaris Jenderal DPD RI) 7. Panitera : Adam Bachtiar, S.H., M.H. (Kepala Biro Persidangan II) 8. Acara 1. Penyampaian Ikhtisar Hasil Pemeriksaan Semester I Tahun 2014 dan Penyerahan Laporan Hasil Pemeriksaan BPK RI serta Ikhtisar Hasil Pemeriksaan Lima Tahun (Semester II Tahun 2009 sd. Semester I Tahun 2014); 2. Laporan Pelaksanaan Tugas Alat Kelengkapan DPD RI; 3. Pengesahan Keputusan DPD RI; 4. Pengesahan Usul Prolegnas; 5. Penutupan Masa Sidang I Tahun Sidang 2014-2015. 9. Hadir : Orang 10. Tidak hadir : Orang II. JALANNYA SIDANG SIDANG DIBUKA PUKUL 13:34:27 WIB PIMPINAN SIDANG : H. IRMAN GUSMAN, SE., MBA. (KETUA DPD RI) Baik Bapak-Ibu sekalian, mohon kembali dan duduk ditempat yang telah ditentukan karena segera kita akan memulai rapat Paripurna ini dan mohon perhatiannya bahwasanya hari ini hari Jum'at sehingga kita harus disiplin dengan waktu karena paling lama kita harus meninggalkan tempat ini pukul 11.50 WIB karena kita siap-siap untuk melaksanakan Salat Jumat bagi yang mengerjakannya karena butuh waktu sekitar 10 – 15 menit untuk persiapan.
    [Show full text]
  • AGENDA REV 5 1.Indd
    DEWAN PERWAKILAN DAERAH REPUBLIK INDONESIA AGENDA KERJA DPD RI 2017 DATA PRIBADI Nama __________________________________________________________ No. Anggota ___________________________________________________ Alamat _________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________ Telepon/Fax ____________________________________________________ Nomor _________________________________________________________ KTP ____________________________________________________________ Paspor _________________________________________________________ Asuransi _______________________________________________________ Pajak Pendapatan ______________________________________________ SIM ____________________________________________________________ PBB ____________________________________________________________ Lain-lain _______________________________________________________ DATA BISNIS Kantor _________________________________________________________ Alamat _________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________ Telepon/Fax ____________________________________________________ Telex ___________________________________________________________ Lain-lain _______________________________________________________ NOMOR TELEPON PENTING Dokter/Dokter Gigi _____________________________________________ Biro Perjalanan _________________________________________________ Taksi ___________________________________________________________ Stasiun K.A
    [Show full text]
  • Lampiran 1 : Matriks Berita 1 : Kemelut Putri Mahkota SINTAKSIS
    Lampiran 1 : Matriks Berita 1 : Kemelut Putri Mahkota SINTAKSIS Headline Lead Latar Informasi Kutipan Sumber Penutup Kemelut Putri Demi tahta Keraton Paragraf 1 – 4 : Paragraf 5 : Sehubungan dengan konflik Mahkota untuk Mangkubumi, Pemberian gelar “Tadinya Pembayun tidak pemberian gelar Sri Sultan bahkan Mangkubumi kepada masalah, tapi setelah ada Mangkubumi pada dirinya, Kemelut (KBBI) = menjual harta keraton Pembayun menyebabkan sabda raja, kami ada batas.” Pembayun memilih untuk keadaan yang genting walau hal tersebut beberapa aktivitasnya tidak berbicara apa – apa atau berbahaya. ditentang oleh menjadi terganggu dan Yudhaningrat, adik tiri Sri dengan alasan bahwa ini sebagian anggota membuat ia hubungannya Sultan. belum waktunya bagi dia keluarga keraton. dengan orang – orang untuk berbicara. sekitar semakin terbatasi. Paragraf 5 & 6 : Paragraf 11 : Sri Sultan mengeluarkan “Saya gemeteran sampai dua dawuh (sabda), tidak lihat Ngarso Dalem pemberian gelar sudah jalan turun. Dua hari Mangkubumi kepada saya tidak bisa tidur,” Pembayun serta akunya (Pembayun). 113 penggantian namanya. Kedua dawuh tersebut menyebabkan polemik. Paragraf 7 : Paragraf 12: Gelar Mangkubumi yang Ia (Pembayun) merasa nama disandang Pembayun Mangkubumi sangat berat menyebabkan konflik karena bermakna pemangku tahta keraton. adat kekuasaan. Paragraf 8 – 11 : Paragraf 13: Pemberian gelar tersebut Ia (Siti Sutiyah) mengaku membuat Pembayun semua penari pun tidak merasa terbeban dan selalu hadir, yang penting tertekan. mereka menekuni tarian dengan latihan sendiri. Paragraf 12 & 13 : Paragraf 14 : Gelar Mangkubumi “H-1 dan H-2 itu datang. bukanlah alasan mengapa Kalau beberapa hari Pembayun menghadiri itu memang sempat tidak latihan. rawuh (datang). Tapi, 114 menjelang pentas, tetap datang kok,” jelasnya. Paragraf 14 – 16 : Paragraf 17 : Prosesi Pemberian gelar “Itu memang kursi putri Mangkubumi pada mahkota itu.
    [Show full text]
  • Mahkamah Agu Mahkamah Agung Republik Indo
    Direktori Putusan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia putusan.mahkamahagung.go.id PUTUSAN Nomor 33 P/HUM/2017 DEMI KEADILAN BERDASARKAN KETUHANAN YANG MAHA ESA MAHKAMAH AGUNG Mahkamah AgungMemeriksa dan mengadili Republik perkara permohonan keberatan Indonesia hak uji materiil terhadap Peraturan Dewan Perwakilan Daerah Republik Indonesia (DPD RI) Nomor 4 Tahun 2017 tentang Tata Tertib, pada tingkat pertama dan terakhir telah memutuskan sebagai berikut, dalam perkara: 1. Ir. ANANG PRIHANTORO, kewarganegaraan Indonesia, tempat tinggal RT. 003 RW. 003 Kelurahan Nambahdadi, Kecamatan Terbanggi Besar, Kabupaten Lampung Tengah, Provinsi Lampung, pekerjaan Anggota DPD RI Periode 2014-2019; 2. MARHANY VICTOR POLY PUA, kewarganegaraan Indonesia, tempat tinggal RT. -/RW 008 Kelurahan Kairagi Dua Kecamatan Mapanget Kota Manado, Provinsi Sulawesi Utara, pekerjaan Anggota DPD RI Periode 2014-2019; 3. DJASARMEN PURBA, S.H. kewarganegaraan Indonesia, tempat tinggal Jl. Kaktus Giwang No. 2A Sukajadi RT/RW: 003/001 Batam, pekerjaan Anggota DPD RI Periode 2014- Mahkamah Agung2019; Republik Indonesia 4. AM. IQBAL PAREWANGI, S.SI, kewarganegaraan Indonesia, tempat tinggal Jl. Datuk Patimang No. 47 RT/RW: 006/003, Desa La’Latang, Kec. Tallo, Kota, Makassar, Provinsi Sulawesi Selatan, pekerjaan Anggota DPD RI Periode 2014-2019; 5. HI AHMAD JAJULI S.IP, kewarganegaraan Indonesia, Jl. Sisinga Mangaraja No. 56 LK2, RT/RW: 012/-, Desa Gedong Air, Kecamatan Tanjung Karang Barat, Kota Bandar Lampung, Provinsi Lampung, pekerjaan Anggota DPD RI Periode 2014-2019; Selanjutnya memberi kuasa kepada : 1. Dr. A. Irmanputra Sidin, S.H., M.H.; 2. Iqbal Tawakkal Pasaribu, S.H.; 3. Hermawanto, S.H.,M.H.; 4. Victor Santoso Tandiasa, S.H., M.H.; Mahkamah Agung5. Agustiar, Republik S.H.; Indonesia Halaman 1 dari 53 halaman.
    [Show full text]
  • ETIKA POLITIK DAN KEKUASAAN (Studi Atas Pemilihan Ketua DPD RI Periode 2017-2019, Oesman Sapta Odang)
    ETIKA POLITIK DAN KEKUASAAN (Studi atas Pemilihan Ketua DPD RI Periode 2017-2019, Oesman Sapta Odang) Skripsi Diajukan Untuk Memenuhi Persyaratan Memperoleh Gelar Sarjana Sosial (S.Sos) Oleh: Muhammad Mardhiyulloh 11141120000045 PROGRAM STUDI ILMU POLITIK FAKULTAS ILMU SOSIAL DAN ILMU POLITIK UNIVERSITAS ISLAM NEGERI SYARIF HIDAYATULLAH JAKARTA 1440 H/2019 M ABSTRAK ETIKA POLITIK DAN KEKUASAAN (Studi atas Pemilihan Ketua DPD RI Periode 2017-2019, Oesman Sapta Odang) Pemilihan Ketua DPD RI merupakan bagian dari pemilihan pimpinan DPD RI, tercakup di dalamnya pemilihan wakil ketua I dan wakil ketua II. Terdapat sesuatu yang berbeda pada pemilihan ketua DPD RI periode 2017-2019 dengan pemilihan-pemilihan periode sebelumnya, yaitu kebiasaan memilih ketua DPD RI dari kalangan independen atau non partisan, sedangkan kali ini memilih ketua DPD RI Oesman Sapta Odang dengan status rangkap jabatan sebagai wakil ketua MPR RI periode 2014-2019 dan juga ketua umum partai Hanura. Selain itu, pemilihan tersebut juga sebagai wujud perubahan Tata Tertib DPD RI No. 1 Tahun 2014 yang mengatur masa jabatan pimpinan selama lima tahun menjadi No. 1 Tahun 2016 dan No. 1 Tahun 2017 dengan aturan dua tahun enam bulan. Secara otomatis periode pimpinan DPD RI 2014-2019 berubah menjadi periode 2014-2017 dan terpaksa berakhir pada April 2017. Namun demikian, Mahkamah Agung (MA) melalui putusannya No. 38P/HUM/2016 dan 20P/HUM/2017 membatalkan perubahan Tata Tertib DPD RI tersebut dan mengembalikannya pada Tata Tertib DPD RI No. 1 Tahun 2014. Akan tetapi, pemilihan tersebut tetap berlangsung dengan diwaranai kericuhan yang berdampak terhadap buruknya citra moral DPD RI. Skripsi ini mengkaji dinamika politik sebenarnya yang terjadi pada pemilihan pimpinan DPD RI periode 2017-2019, juga membedah fenomena tersebut dan status rangkap jabatan Oesman Sapta Odang dari sudut pandang etika politik, juga membongkar sumber-sumber kekuasaan Oesman Sapta Odang sebagai Ketua DPD RI terpilih.
    [Show full text]
  • Mapping Status and Roles of Javanese Women in Indonesian Literary Texts
    PEMETAAN STATUS DAN PERAN PEREMPUAN JAWA DALAM TEKS SASTRA INDONESIA MAPPING STATUS AND ROLES OF JAVANESE WOMEN IN INDONESIAN LITERARY TEXTS Esti Ismawati Program Pascasarjana Universitas Widya Dharma Klaten [email protected] Abstract Status and roles of Javanese women in Indonesian literary text has been written in the form of short stories, novels, and romances, as seen in Umar Kayam, YB Mangunwijaya, Arswendo Atmowiloto, Nh Dini, and Ahmad Tohari, but until now no one has diccussed it scientifically. This paper describes status and roles of Javanese women in Indonesian literary texts from the colonial era, independence era, today’s era, and Javanese women in reality, because the literary texts are the reflection of the society. Are there changes within the status and roles of Javanese women in Indonesian literary texts and in the reality? The methods used in this research are descriptive method for the Javanese women in literary texts and survey for the Javanese women in the reality. The techniques used are bibliography technic (reading appreciation) for literary text and indepth interview and questionnaire. It can be concluded that the status and roles of Javanese women in Indonesian literary texts and in the reality changes from era to era. The changes includemindset and lifestyle change. There is no difference between the status and roles of Javanese women in Indonesian literary texts and in the reality. Keywords: Javanese women, status, roles, literary texts, reality Abstrak Status dan peran perempuan Jawa dalam teks sastra Indonesia telah banyak ditulis dalam bentuk cerpen, novel, dan roman, sebagaimana tampak dalam karya Umar Kayam, YB Mangunwijaya, Arswendo Atmowiloto, Nh Dini, dan Ahmad Tohari.
    [Show full text]
  • 73 Suksesi Kepemimpinan Kraton Ngayogyakarta Dalam Dualitas Struktur
    Wahyuni Choiriyati, Suksesi Kepemimpinan Kraton Ngayogyakarta Dalam Dualitas Struktur 73 Suksesi Kepemimpinan Kraton Ngayogyakarta dalam Dualitas Struktur Wahyuni Choiriyati Dosen Fakultas Ilmu Komunikasi Universitas Gunadarma Jalan Margonda Raya No. 100 Depok 16424, Jawa Barat, Indonesia. Email: [email protected] Abstract King declaration was delivered by Sultan Hamengkubuwono X exposing his princess for next in order to be crowned in Yogyakarta’s palace.This raised contentious among Sultan Hamengkubuwono and his brothers. This was wrapped in cultural communication practicess in high level of context that was not easy to understand especially for society in general. This writing is to focus signifying king declaration in society in line to deep structure and culture. By phenomenology approach with critical paradigm, data gathered by in depth interviews and observation. Results of research found that king decralation was perceived as high context communication practices. This tended to economic political nuances. Nowdays, King has not dedicated to serve the society yet, but he tended to want to be respected. Power structure was maintained to secure the power legitimation including reveneu of land taxes and royal familiy businesses in palace. Each of them played the significant roles to secure and maintain in inner cirlce of power in the palace. Keywords: succession of leadership, structure, power, culture and communication Abstrak Sabdaraja yang disampaikan oleh Sultan Hamengkubuwono X mengungkapkan bahwa putri sulungnya akan diangkat menjadi penerus tahta kraton Yogyakarta. Hal ini menimbulkan ketegangan antara sultan Hamengkubuwono X dengan adik-adiknya. Semua ini dikemas dalam praktik komunikasi budaya konteks tinggi yang tidak mudah diterjemahkan masyarakat awam. Fokus tulisan ini adalah menggambarkan pemakanaan masyarakat Yogyakarta terkait sabdaraja dan segala hal yang berkaitan dengan struktur kekuasaan dan budaya yang melingkupinya.
    [Show full text]
  • Open Letter to Mr. Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono President of The
    Open Letter to Mr. Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono President of the Republic of Indonesia Jl. Veteran No. 16 Jakarta Pusat Mr. Marzuki Alie Speaker of the People’s Representative Council (DPR) Parliament of Indonesia Gedung DPR RI, Jl Jenderal Gatot Subroto Jakarta 10270 Mr. Irman Gusman Speaker of the Regional Representative Council (DPD) Parliament of Indonesia Jl Gatot Subroto No.6 Jakarta 10270 8 August 2012 Subject: Ensure access to justice for the 1965-66 abuses and effective remedies for victims Dear President Yudhoyono, Dear Speaker Alie, Dear Speaker Gusman, The International Federation for Human Rights (FIDH) writes to you to seek your prompt actions on the findings of the National Human Rights Commission of Indonesia (Komnas HAM) following its four-year investigation into allegations of human rights abuses perpetrated in the context of the anti-communist purges from 1965 to 1966. In the course of the purges, hundreds of thousands, perhaps even over a million people are believed to have been killed, disappeared, raped, or tortured by state security forces and non-state actors abetted by the government. A large number of people were also allegedly detained in the decade following the purge with little regard for due process of law. Ensuring justice and remedies for the victims and their families is a legal obligation under Indonesian and international law. In the 850-page report released on 23 July, Komnas HAM found that state officials were responsible for the persecution of alleged members or supporters of the Indonesian Communist Party (PKI) after the failed 1965 coup. The report characterized the persecution as gross human rights violations www.fidh.org / 17, passage de la Main-d’Or / 75011 Paris / France / Tél +33 (0)1 43 55 25 18 / Fax +33 (0)1 43 55 18 80 / [email protected] / N° SIREN 352 390 082 / Code APE 9499Z that were both widespread and systematic.
    [Show full text]
  • Komisi Konstitusi Ke-1
    DEWAN PERWAKILAN DAERAH REPUBLIK INDONESIA ----------- RISALAH SIDANG PARIPURNA KE-3 MASA SIDANG I TAHUN SIDANG 2014-2015 DEWAN PERWAKILAN DAERAH REPUBLIK INDONESIA I. KETERANGAN 1. Hari : Kamis 2. Tanggal : 2 Oktober 2014 3. Waktu : 14:19 WIB – Selesai 4. Tempat : R. Rapat Nusantara V 5. Pimpinan Sidang : 1. Drs. Aidil Fitri Syah, M.M. (Anggota DPD RI Tertua) 2. Riri Damayanti John Latief, S.Psi (Anggota DPD RI Termuda) 6. Sekretaris Sidang : 1. Prof. Dr. Sudarsono Hardjosoekarto (Sekretaris Jenderal DPD RI) 2. Zul Evi Astar, S.H. (Wakil Sekretaris Jenderal DPD RI) 7. Panitera Adam Bachtiar, S.H., M.H. (Kepala Biro Persidangan II) 8. Acara : Pemilihan Pimpinan DPD RI 9. Hadir : Orang 10. Tidak hadir : Orang II. JALANNYA SIDANG : SIDANG DIBUKA PUKUL 14.19 WIB PIMPINAN SIDANG : Drs. AIDIL FITRI SYAH, M.M. (KETUA SEMENTARA DPD RI) Kepada Pimpinan, konduktor yang memimpin lagu ini kami persilakan. Kepada bapak dan ibu sekalian dan hadirin sekalian yang baik yang anggota DPD maupun yang hadir kami mohon berdiri karena kita bersama melagukan lagu kebangsaan kita yang kita rebut begitu sulit untuk merebut kemerdekaan ini. Para hadirin sekalian kami persilakan berdiri. PEMBICARA : PADUAN SUARA Hiduplah Indonesia Raya… Indonesia tanah airku Tanah tumpah darahku Disanalah aku berdiri Jadi pandu ibuku Indonesia kebangsaanku Bangsa dan Tanah Airku Marilah kita berseru Indonesia bersatu Hiduplah tanahku Hiduplah negriku Bangsaku Rakyatku semuanya Bangunlah jiwanya Bangunlah badannya Untuk Indonesia Raya Indonesia Raya Merdeka Merdeka Tanahku negriku yang kucinta Indonesia Raya Merdeka Merdeka Hiduplah Indonesia Raya Indonesia Raya Merdeka Merdeka Tanahku negriku yang kucinta Indonesia Raya Merdeka Merdeka Hiduplah Indonesia Raya SIDANG PARIPURNA KE-3 DPD RI MS I TS 2014-2015 KAMIS, 2 OKTOBER 2014 1 PIMPINAN SIDANG: Drs.
    [Show full text]
  • TINJAUAN FIQH SIYA<SAH DUSTU<RI><YAH TERHADAP DUALISME MASA JABATAN KEPEMIMPINAN DEWAN PERWAKILAN DAERAH REPUBLIK IN
    TINJAUAN FIQH SIYA<SAH DUSTU<RI><YAH TERHADAP DUALISME MASA JABATAN KEPEMIMPINAN DEWAN PERWAKILAN DAERAH REPUBLIK INDONESIA PASCA PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG NO.20P/HUM/2017 SKRIPSI Oleh: Muhammad Fahreza Dicky Firdaus NIM. C05216037 Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Ampel Fakultas Syariah Dan Hukum Jurusan Hukum Publik Islam Prodi Hukum Tata Negara Surabaya 2019 ii iii iv v ABSTRAK Skripsi ini merupakan hasil penelitian normatif yang berjudul “Tinjauan Fiqh Siya>sah Dustu>ri>yah Terhadap Dualisme Masa Jabatan Kepemimpinan Dewan Perwakilan Daerah Republik Indonesia Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Agung No.20P/HUM/2017” yang bertujuan untuk menjawab dua rumusan masalah yaitu: bagaimana Analisis Terhadap Dualisme Masa Jabatan Kepemimpinan DPD RI Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Agung No.20P/HUM/2017? serta, bagaimana Analisis Fiqh Siya<sah Dustu<ri<yah Terhadap Masa Jabatan Kepemimpinan DPD RI Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Agung No.20P/HUM/2017? Data penelitian ini dihimpun menggunakan teknik dokumentasi dengan pendekatan statue approach. Teknik analisis data menggunakan teknik kualitatif yang selanjutnya disusun secara sistematis sehingga menjadi data yang konkrit mengenai Dualisme Masa Jabatan Kepemimpinan Dewan Perwakilan Daerah Republik Indonesia Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Agung No.20P/HUM/2017, selanjutnya data tersebut diolah dan dianalisis menggunakan teori hukum Islam, yaitu Fiqh Siya>sah Dustu>ri>yah. Hasil Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa Mahkamah Agung melalui Putusan Nomor 20P/HUM/2017 membatalkan dan menyatakan Peraturan Tata Tertib DPD No. 1 Tahun 2017 tidak mempunyai kekuatan hukum yang mengikat karena bertentangan dengan Lampiran II Huruf C5, nomor 155 Ketentuan Peralihan UU No 12 Tahun 2011 tentang Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan. Menurut pendapat hukum Mahkamah Agung pada dasarnya mulai berlakunya Peraturan Perundang-Undangan tidak dapat ditentukan lebih awal daripada saat pengundangannya, dengan demikian nomor 155 Ketentuan Peralihan itu menegaskan tentang larangan asas retroaktif.
    [Show full text]
  • India - Indonesia Relations
    India - Indonesia Relations India and Indonesia have shared two millennia of close cultural and commercial contacts. The Hindu, Buddhist and later Muslim faith travelled to Indonesia from the shores of India. The Indonesian folk art and dramas are based on stories from the great epics of Ramayana and Mahabharata. The shared culture, colonial history and post-independence goals of political sovereignty, economic self-sufficiency and independent foreign policy have unifying effect on the bilateral relations. Political Relations During our respective struggles for independence, the national leaderships of India and Indonesia led by Jawaharlal Nehru and President Sukarno collaborated closely in supporting the cause of Asian and African independence and later laid the foundation of the Afro-Asian and Non-Aligned Movements at the Bandung Conference in 1955. Since the adoption of India’s ‘Look East Policy’ in 1991, there has been a rapid development of bilateral relations in political, security, defence, commercial and cultural fields. The current Government wants to further deepen the relationship with East Asia and has therefore rightly titled its policy as “Act East”. State Visit of President Yudhoyono in January 2011: During the State Visit of President Mr S. B. Yudhoyono to India in 2005, the two countries signed a Joint Declaration on Establishing a Strategic Partnership. In January 2011, President Yudhoyono visited India as the Chief Guest on the occasion of India’s Republic Day. During the visit, 16 Inter- Governmental Agreements were signed which included an Extradition Treaty, Mutual Legal Assistance Treaty, an MoU on Establishing a Biennial Trade Ministers’ Forum, an MoU on Cooperation in Oil and Gas, an MoU on Science and Technology Cooperation, and a Cultural Exchange Programme.
    [Show full text]
  • A Special Open Forum and Luncheon
    A Special Open Forum and Luncheon Enhanced Power of the DPD (Senate) and the Future of Democracy in Indonesia The Honorable Irman Gusman Speaker of the DPD May 21, 2013 Washington, DC The United States – Indonesia Society www.usindo.org On May 21, 2013, the Honorable Irman Gusman, speaker of Indonesia’s House of Regional Representatives or Dewan Perwakilan Daerah (DPD) spoke to USINDO members and guests at the Cosmos Club in Washington, DC. He discussed the DPD’s role in Indonesian democracy and about the DPD’s role, strengthened since Indonesia’s Constitutional Court recently granted the DPD the authority to propose and deliberate bills. Photos of the event can be seen here. Introduction by Ambassador David Merrill, President of USINDO Ambassador David Merrill, USINDO’s President, introduced USINDO’s Special Open Forum Event with, Irman Gusman, the DPD Chairman. While many people familiar with Indonesia know about the DPR, few know about the DPD, Indonesia’s upper legislative body, Ambassador Merrill said. Recently, the Constitutional Court granted the DPD the authority to propose and deliberate bills, relating to regional autonomy, natural resources, and the relationship between central and local governments. Indonesia’s President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono (SBY) invited Irman Gusman to participate in the Democrat Party’s convention later this year and to be considered for the Party’s 2014 presidential nomination. Irman Gusman began his government career in 1989 when he joined Indonesia’s People’s Consultative Assembly (MPR), Indonesia’s third legislative body, as a representative from West Sumatra. Irman Gusman worked to amend the Indonesian Constitution, so the DPD could be created.
    [Show full text]