DOCSLIB.ORG

Putusan Sebagai Berikut

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Putusan Sebagai Berikut P U T U S A N Perkara Nomor: 25/KPPU-I/2009 Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha Republik Indonesia (selanjutnya disebut “Komisi”) yang memeriksa dugaan pelanggaran Pasal 5 dan Pasal 21 Undang-undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1999 tentang Larangan Praktek Monopoli dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat (selanjutnya disebut “UU No. 5 Tahun 1999”) berkaitan dengan Penetapan Harga Fuel Surcharge Dalam Industri Jasa Penerbangan Domestik yang dilakukan oleh: (1) Terlapor I, PT Garuda Indonesia (Persero), berkedudukan di Gedung Manajemen Garuda Indonesia Lantai 3 Area Perkantoran Bandara Soekarno Hatta, Cengkareng 19120, Indonesia;----------------------------------------------------- (2) Terlapor II, PT Sriwijaya Air, berkedudukan di Jalan Pangeran Jayakarta Nomor 68 Blok C 15-16, Jakarta Pusat 10730, Indonesia;----------------------------- (3) Terlapor III, PT Merpati Nusantara Airlines (Persero), berkedudukan di Gedung Merpati, Jalan Angkasa Blok B.15, Kavling 2-3, Jakarta Pusat 10720, Indonesia;------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (4) Terlapor IV, PT Mandala Airlines, berkedudukan di Jalan Tomang Raya Kavling 33-37, Jakarta Barat 11440, Indonesia;----------------------------------------- (5) Terlapor V, PT Riau Airlines, berkedudukan di Jalan Jenderal Sudirman Nomor 438 Pekanbaru, Riau 28125, Indonesia; ------------------------------------------------- (6) Terlapor VI, PT Travel Express Aviation Services, berkedudukan di Boutique Office Park, Benyamin Suaeb Blok A11/12, Kemayoran, Jakarta Pusat 10630, Indonesia;------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (7) Terlapor VII, PT Lion Mentari Airlines, berkedudukan di Lion Air Tower, Jalan Gajah Mada Nomor 7, Jakarta Pusat 10130, Indonesia; ------------------------- S A L I N A N (8) Terlapor VIII, PT Wings Abadi Airlines, berkedudukan di Lion Air Tower, Jalan Gajah Mada Nomor 7, Jakarta Pusat 10130, Indonesia; ------------------------- (9) Terlapor IX, PT Metro Batavia, berkedudukan di Jl. Ir. H. Juanda No. 15, Jakarta Pusat 10120, Indonesia; ----------------------------------------------------------- (10) Terlapor X, PT Kartika Airlines, berkedudukan di Wisma Intra Asia, Jalan Prof. Dr. Soepomo, S.H. Nomor 58, Jakarta Selatan 12870, Indonesia; -------------------- (11) Terlapor XI, PT Linus Airways, terakhir diketahui berkedudukan di Grand Boutique Centre, Jalan Mangga Dua Raya Blok C Nomor 4, Jakarta Utara 14430, Indonesia; ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ (12) Terlapor XII, PT Trigana Air Service, berkedudukan di Komplek Puri Sentra Niaga, Jalan Wiraloka Blok D 68-69-70, Kalimalang, Jakarta Timur 13620, Indonesia;(------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ (13) Terlapor XIII, PT Indonesia AirAsia, berkedudukan di Office Management Building, 2nd Floor, Soekarno-Hatta International Airport Jakarta 19110, Indonesia;------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- telah mengambil Putusan sebagai berikut: Majelis Komisi: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Setelah membaca surat-surat dan dokumen-dokumen dalam perkara ini;------------------- Setelah membaca Laporan Hasil Pemeriksaan Pendahuluan (selanjutnya disebut “LHPP”);-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Setelah membaca Laporan Hasil Pemeriksaan Lanjutan (selanjutnya disebut “LHPL”); Setelah membaca Tanggapan/Pembelaan/Pendapat para Terlapor; -------------------------- Setelah membaca Berita Acara Pemeriksaan (selanjutnya disebut “BAP”); --------------- TENTANG DUDUK PERKARA 1. Menimbang bahwa berdasarkan data dan informasi yang berkembang di masyarakat, Sekretariat Komisi melakukan monitoring terhadap pelaku usaha 2 S A L I N A N yang diduga melakukan pelanggaran terhadap UU No. 5 Tahun 1999 terkait dengan pemberlakuan fuel surcharge oleh maskapai penerbangan; ------------------ 2. Menimbang bahwa setelah melakukan kegiatan monitoring terhadap pelaku usaha, Sekretariat Komisi menyimpulkan adanya kejelasan dan kelengkapan dugaan pelanggaran yang disusun dalam bentuk Resume Monitoring;------------------------ 3. Menimbang bahwa setelah melakukan Kegiatan Pemberkasan terhadap Resume Monitoring, Sekretariat Komisi menyusun dan menyampaikan Berkas Laporan Dugaan Pelanggaran kepada Komisi untuk dilakukan Gelar Laporan;--------------- 4. Menimbang bahwa berdasarkan Rapat Gelar Laporan, Komisi menilai Laporan Dugaan Pelanggaran layak untuk dilakukan Pemeriksaan Pendahuluan; ------------ 5. Menimbang bahwa selanjutnya Komisi menerbitkan Penetapan Komisi Nomor 118/KPPU/PEN/IX/2009 tanggal 28 September 2009 tentang Pemeriksaan Pendahuluan Perkara Nomor 25/KPPU-I/2009 terhitung sejak tanggal 28 September 2009 sampai dengan tanggal 06 November 2009 (vide bukti A1); ------ 6. Menimbang bahwa untuk melaksanakan Pemeriksaan Pendahuluan, Komisi menerbitkan Keputusan Komisi Nomor 221/KPPU/KEP/IX/2009 tanggal 28 September 2009 tentang Penugasan Anggota Komisi sebagai Tim Pemeriksa dalam Pemeriksaan Pendahuluan Perkara Nomor 25/KPPU-I/2009 (vide bukti A2);-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 7. Menimbang bahwa selanjutnya Sekretaris Jenderal Sekretariat Komisi menerbitkan Surat Tugas Nomor 970/SJ/ST/IX/2009 tanggal 28 September 2009 yang menugaskan Sekretariat Komisi untuk membantu Tim Pemeriksa dalam Pemeriksaan Pendahuluan (vide bukti A3); ---------------------------------------------- 8. Menimbang bahwa Tim Pemeriksa telah menyampaikan Petikan Penetapan Pemeriksaan Pendahuluan dan Salinan Laporan Dugaan Pelanggaran kepada para Terlapor (vide bukti A4 s/d A27); --------------------------------------------------------- 9. Menimbang bahwa setelah melakukan Pemeriksaan Pendahuluan, Tim Pemeriksa menemukan adanya bukti awal yang cukup terhadap dugaan pelanggaran Pasal 5 dan Pasal 21 UU No. 5 Tahun 1999 yang dilakukan oleh para Terlapor dan merekomendasikan kepada Komisi untuk melanjutkan pemeriksaan ke tahap Pemeriksaan Lanjutan yang dituangkan dalam bentuk LHPP (vide bukti A43);---- 3 S A L I N A N 10. Menimbang bahwa berdasarkan rekomendasi Tim Pemeriksa, selanjutnya Komisi menerbitkan Penetapan Komisi Nomor: 136/KPPU/PEN/XI/2009 tanggal 09 November 2009 tentang Pemeriksaan Lanjutan Perkara Nomor 25/KPPU/I/2009 terhitung sejak tanggal 09 November 2009 sampai dengan tanggal 05 Februari 2010 (vide bukti A45); ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 11. Menimbang bahwa untuk melaksanakan Pemeriksaan Lanjutan, Komisi menerbitkan Keputusan Komisi Nomor 247/KPPU/KEP/XI/2009 tanggal 09 November 2009 tentang Penugasan Anggota Komisi sebagai Tim Pemeriksa dalam Pemeriksaan Lanjutan Perkara Nomor 25/KPPU-I/2009 (vide bukti A46); - 12. Menimbang bahwa selanjutnya Sekretaris Jenderal Sekretariat Komisi menerbitkan Surat Tugas Nomor 1174/SJ/ST/XI/2009 tanggal 09 November 2009 yang menugaskan Sekretariat Komisi untuk membantu Tim Pemeriksa dalam Pemeriksaan Lanjutan (vide bukti A47); ------------------------------------------------- 13. Menimbang bahwa Tim Pemeriksa telah menyampaikan Petikan Penetapan Pemeriksaan Lanjutan dan Salinan LHPP kepada para Terlapor (vide bukti A48 s/d A60); -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 14. Menimbang setelah melakukan Pemeriksaan Lanjutan Perkara 25/KPPU-I/2009, Tim Pemeriksa Lanjutan menilai perlu dilakukan Perpanjangan Pemeriksaan Lanjutan, maka Komisi menerbitkan Keputusan Komisi No. 60/KPPU/KEP/II/2010 tanggal 08 Februari 2010 tentang Perpanjangan Pemeriksaan Lanjutan Perkara 25/KPPU-I/2009 terhitung sejak tanggal 08 Februari 2010 sampai dengan 23 Maret 2010 (vide bukti A76); ---------------------- 15. Menimbang bahwa untuk melaksanakan Perpanjangan Pemeriksaan Lanjutan, Komisi menerbitkan Keputusan No. 61/KPPU/KEP/II/2010 tanggal 08 Februari 2010 tentang Penugasan Anggota Komisi sebagai Tim Pemeriksa dalam Perpanjangan Pemeriksaan Lanjutan Perkara Nomor 25/KPPU-I/2010 (vide bukti A77); ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 16. Menimbang bahwa selanjutnya Sekretaris Jenderal Sekretariat Komisi menerbitkan Surat Tugas Nomor 147/SJ/ST/II/2010 tanggal 08 Februari 2010 yang menugaskan Sekretariat Komisi untuk membantu Tim Pemeriksa dalam Perpanjangan Pemeriksaan Lanjutan (vide bukti A75); -------------------------------- 4 S A L I N A N 17. Menimbang bahwa Tim Pemeriksa telah menyampaikan Petikan Penetapan Perpanjangan Pemeriksaan Lanjutan kepada para Terlapor (vide bukti A80 s/d A92); ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 18. Menimbang bahwa dalam proses Pemeriksaan Pendahuluan dan Pemeriksaan Lanjutan serta perpanjangannya, Tim Pemeriksa telah mendengar keterangan dari para Terlapor, para Saksi dan Pemerintah; ----------------------------------------------- 19. Menimbang bahwa identitas dan keterangan Terlapor dan para Saksi, telah dicatat dalam BAP yang telah diakui kebenarannya serta masing-masing telah ditandatangani oleh yang bersangkutan (vide bukti B1 s/d B35); --------------------- 20. Menimbang bahwa dalam Pemeriksaan Pendahuluan dan Pemeriksaan Lanjutan, Tim Pemeriksa telah mendapatkan, meneliti dan menilai sejumlah surat dan atau dokumen, BAP serta bukti-bukti lain yang telah diperoleh selama pemeriksaan dan penyelidikan; ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Liste-Exploitants-Aeronefs.Pdf
    EN EN EN COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES Brussels, XXX C(2009) XXX final COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No xxx/2009 of on the list of aircraft operators which performed an aviation activity listed in Annex I to Directive 2003/87/EC on or after 1 January 2006 specifying the administering Member State for each aircraft operator (Text with EEA relevance) EN EN COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No xxx/2009 of on the list of aircraft operators which performed an aviation activity listed in Annex I to Directive 2003/87/EC on or after 1 January 2006 specifying the administering Member State for each aircraft operator (Text with EEA relevance) THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, Having regard to Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 October 2003 establishing a system for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community and amending Council Directive 96/61/EC1, and in particular Article 18a(3)(a) thereof, Whereas: (1) Directive 2003/87/EC, as amended by Directive 2008/101/EC2, includes aviation activities within the scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community (hereinafter the "Community scheme"). (2) In order to reduce the administrative burden on aircraft operators, Directive 2003/87/EC provides for one Member State to be responsible for each aircraft operator. Article 18a(1) and (2) of Directive 2003/87/EC contains the provisions governing the assignment of each aircraft operator to its administering Member State. The list of aircraft operators and their administering Member States (hereinafter "the list") should ensure that each operator knows which Member State it will be regulated by and that Member States are clear on which operators they should regulate.
    [Show full text]
  • Analisa Harapan Dan Persepsi Penumpang Terhadap Kualitas Makanan Yang Disediakan Oleh Maskapai Penerbangan Domestik Di Indonesia
    ANALISA HARAPAN DAN PERSEPSI PENUMPANG TERHADAP KUALITAS MAKANAN YANG DISEDIAKAN OLEH MASKAPAI PENERBANGAN DOMESTIK DI INDONESIA Christine Tantrisna dan Kanya Prawitasari Alumnus Program Manajemen Perhotelan, Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Kristen Petra Surabaya Abstrak: Penumpang pesawat terbang memiliki harapan tertentu terhadap maskapai penerbangan yang digunakan, salah satunya dari segi kualitas makanan yang disediakan selama penerbangan. Apa yang penumpang terima belum tentu sesuai dengan apa yang diharapkan. Penelitian ini mengukur perbedaan harapan dan persepsi penumpang terhadap kualitas makanan berdasarkan 7 variabel yaitu: warna, penampilan, bentuk, tekstur, aroma, tingkat kematangan, dan rasa. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa ada gap yang signifikan antara harapan dan persepsi. Kata kunci: harapan, persepsi, kualitas makanan, maskapai penerbangan domestik, indonesia. Abstract: Passengers have certain expectations about the airline they use; one of them is about food quality served during flight. What passengers get is not always suitable with what they expect. This research examines the difference between expectation and perception of food quality by seven variables, namely: color, performance, shape, texture, aroma, degree of doneness, and taste. The result shows that there is a significant gap between expectation and perception. Keywords: expectation, perception, food quality, domestic airlines, indonesia. Sebagai bisnis yang bergerak di sektor jasa atau bahwa kualitas makanan memegang peranan penting layanan, bisnis penerbangan menyediakan beberapa dalam mempengaruhi mereka dalam memilih fasilitas bagi para penumpang dimana salah satunya maskapai penerbangan. Ditambah lagi, 39% respon- adalah fasilitas pemberian makanan dan minuman den mengatakan bahwa mereka mengharapkan saat penerbangan atau yang biasa disebut inflight kualitas makanan yang lebih baik ketika kompetisi catering. Layanan inflight catering telah dimulai mulai muncul di rute tertentu.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Tanggung Jawab Pengangkut Terhadap Penumpang Yang Tidak Terdaftar Dalam Manifes (Studi Kasus Jatuhnya Pesawat Lion Air Jt
    Abimanyu Faiz Prajogo & H. K. Martono TANGGUNG JAWAB PENGANGKUT TERHADAP PENUMPANG YANG TIDAK TERDAFTAR DALAM MANIFES (STUDI KASUS JATUHNYA PESAWAT LION AIR JT 610 DI KARAWANG) Volume 2 Nomor 2, Desember 2019 E-ISSN : 2655-7347 TANGGUNG JAWAB PENGANGKUT TERHADAP PENUMPANG YANG TIDAK TERDAFTAR DALAM MANIFES (STUDI KASUS JATUHNYA PESAWAT LION AIR JT 610 DI KARAWANG) Abimanyu Faiz Prajogo (Mahasiswa Program S1 Fakultas Hukum Universitas Tarumanagara) [email protected] Prof. Dr. H.K. Martono, S.H., L.L.M. (Corresponding Author) (Dosen Fakultas Hukum Universitas Tarumanagara, Meraih Sarjana Hukum pada Fakultas Hukum Universitas Universitas Indonesia) (E-mail: [email protected]) Abstract Lion Air with fligh code JT-610 route Jakarta to Pangkal Pinang on October 29th, 2028 which crashed in Karawang Waters carrying 178 passengers, one child passenger, 2 babies, and 7 cabin crew. On the plane there are passengers who are not on the ticket or not registered. Issues issued are how the responsibility of the carrier in an aircraft accident that is not listed in the passenger manifest. The research method used in this thesis research is normative legal research. The results of the research prove that passengers who are not in the manifest may receive compensation, but only compensate for voluntary purchases. It may be possible to request ex gratia or voluntarily to buy a passenger ticket that cannot be ordered in the passenger manifest. However, based on information compiled from PT Jasa Raharja, checking the heirs or families of victims of the crash of the Lion Air JT 610 aircraft which were not equipped in the manifest of the aircraft could still receive compensation.
    [Show full text]
  • Laws and Regulations: Air Transportation of Persons with Disabilities (PWD) and Others in Indonesia
    International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Invention ISSN (Online): 2319 – 7722, ISSN (Print): 2319 – 7714 www.ijhssi.org ||Volume 6 Issue 11||November. 2017 || PP.50-63 Laws and Regulations: Air Transportation of Persons with Disabilities (PWD) and Others in Indonesia Christine K,1 Frans Kurniawan,2 and Martono3 Abstract: This article purported to explore laws and regulations on air transportation of persons with disabilities (PWD) and others in Indonesia. It consist of three chapter namely chapter one regarding legal ground such as the United Nations (UN), Act No. 13 Year 1998, Act No. 39 Year 1999, high light of Act No. 39 Year 1999, PWD related to Chicago Convention of 1944, PWD in the ICAO Doc.9984, legal ground of PWD in the Civil Aviation Act of 2009; chapter two regarding air transportation of PWD and others provides Citilink’s COC includes the use of electronic ticket, cancellation and refund of E-ticket, legal liability, carrying PWD; Garuda Indonesia’s COC includes the right to refuse carriage, special assistance, passenger with illnesses and PWD, travel with a companion, special assistance for prisoners; Indonesian AirAsia’s COC includes PWD, passenger with a companion, passengers with a medical condition /illnesses, unaccompanied child, pregnant women, infants 8 days and/or below, the right to refuse and others; Lion Air’s COC includes PWD, the right to refuse; Sriwijaya Air’s COC includes the right to deny carriage and other; chapter three conclusion and recommendation. Keywords: persons with disabilities. air transportation, condition of carriage ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------- Date of Submission: 18-11-2017 Date of acceptance: 30-11-2017 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I.
    [Show full text]
  • Foreign ICAO 3LD Additions, Deletions, and Modifications (Excluding U.S.)
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION N JO 7340.470 NOTICE FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION Air Traffic Organization Policy Effective Date: July 11, 2018 Cancellation Date: July 11, 2019 SUBJ: Foreign ICAO 3LD Additions, Deletions, and Modifications (excluding U.S.) 1. Purpose of This Notice. This notice modifies FAA Order JO 7340.2, Contractions, Chapter 3, Sections 1, 2, and 3, !CAO Aircraft Company Three-Letter Identifier and/or Telephony Designator. This notice reflects recent changes initiated by countries other than the United States (U.S.) including new ICAO three letter designators (3LDs), deletions ofdefunct ICAO 3LDs, and modifications to ICAO 3LDs, associated telephonies, and companies/agencies. This Notice supplements FAA Order JO 7340.2 until the additions and modifications are incorporated into the Order. This Notice does not replace or substitute for GENOTs issued by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Air Traffic Organization (ATO) for ICAO 3LDs assigned and authorized for U.S. aircraft operators. 2. Audience. This notice applies to the following Air Traffic Organization (ATO) service units: Air Traffic Services, and System Operations Services; ATO Safety and Technical Training; and all associated air traffic control facilities. This notice is informational in nature and does not require documentation as supplemental training in FAA Form 3120-1, Training and Proficiency Record. 3. Where Can I Find This Notice? This notice is available on the MyFAA employee website at https://employees.faa.gov/tools_resources/orders_ notices/ and on the air traffic publications website at http://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/. 4. Source Document. The source document for the ICAO 3LD additions and modifications contained in this notice is ICAO Document 8585, Designatorsfor Aircraft Operating Agencies, Aeronautical Authorities, and Services.
    [Show full text]
  • Vol-5, Issue 2
    International Journal of Management Sciences and Business Research, Feb-2016 ISSN (2226-8235) Vol-5, Issue 2 Analysis on the Factors Causing Airlines Bankruptcy: Cases in Indonesia Author’s Details: (1)Suharto Abdul Majid-Faculty of Economic and Business, Padjadjaran University, Bandung, Indonesia (2) Sucherly - Faculty of Economic and Business, Padjadjaran University, Bandung, Indonesia (3) Umi Kaltum- Faculty of Economic and Business, Padjadjaran University, Bandung, Indonesia Abstract the high growth of national aviation services after the aviation deregulation in 2000 has given a positive impact on the increase of national economic activities, especially in tour and trade. In the same time, however, it negatively impacts the aviation business itself, making many airline companies stop their operation and then go to bankruptcy. The aim of this research is to analyze the factors causing bankruptcy to some national airline companies in Indonesia after the aviation deregulation in the periods of 2001-2010 and 2011-2015. It is an exploratory research with a qualitative descriptive approach emphasizing on evaluating the factors causing bankruptcy to a number of domestic airlines in Indonesia. The method of data collection is an interview with the format of focus group discussion (FGD), while the data analysis uses factor analysis method. The results of this research show that there are two main factors that cause bankruptcy to a number of domestic airlines in Indonesia. They are both internal and external factors of the companies. Key words: Airline companies bankruptcy, internal factors, and external factors. INTRODUCTION Since the implementation of the national aviation deregulation policy in 2000, the growth of aviation business in Indonesia increases rapidly.
    [Show full text]
  • List Published on 24 July 2008
    AirSafe.com - Additional Resources and Offers Thanks for downloanding this document from AirSafe.com. We'd like to make you aware of some of our special offers and resources: Other Online Resources Airline Safety: AirSafe.com, AirSafeNews.com , Plane-Crash-Videos.net, FlightsGoneBad.com Airline Baggae: AirSafe.com Baggage and Security Guide Fear of Flying: fear.airsafe.org - Featuring services offered by the SOAR fear of flying organization Investing Advice: MoneyBahn.com - for free educational seminars offers, join the mailing list Online marketing: AirSafe-Media.com Special Offers: If you want to receive special offers from Dr. Curtis, including free advice on dealing with airline safety, and other free offers, please subscribe to the AirSafeNews.com mailing list. Dr. Todd Curtis has also created a number of other online resources: Airline Safety: AirSafe.com, and AirSafeNews.com Investing Advice: MoneyBahn.com Online marketing: AirSafe-Media.com Keep in touch with Dr. Curtis and AirSafe.com: Facebook: facebook.com/airsafe LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/in/airsafe Twitter: twitter.com/airsafe Email: [email protected] 24.07.2008 LEGAL NOTICE The civil aviation authorities of Member States of the European Community are only able to inspect aircraft of airlines that operate flights to and from Community airports; and in view of the random nature of such inspections, it is not possible to check all aircraft that land at each Community airport. The fact that an airline is not included in the Community list does not, therefore, automatically mean that it meets the applicable safety standards. Where an airline which is currently included in the Community list deems itself to be in conformity with the necessary technical elements and requirements prescribed by the applicable international safety standards, it may request the Commission to commence the procedure for its removal from the list.
    [Show full text]
  • Publications 2019
    AAIP Policy Paper No. 2 / 2019 – Reviewing Ownership and Control of the Indonesian Airlines Ridha Aditya Nugraha ASEAN Aviation Integration Platform (AAIP) Policy Paper No. 2 / 2019 Reviewing Ownership and Control of the Indonesian Airlines Ridha Aditya Nugraha Air Power Centre of Indonesia Air and Space Law Studies, International Business Law Program Universitas Prasetiya Mulya Member of German Aviation Research Society The views expressed are those of the author. 2 AAIP Policy Paper No. 2 / 2019 – Reviewing Ownership and Control of the Indonesian Airlines Ridha Aditya Nugraha Contents Executive Summary .............................................................................................................................. 4 1. The Liberalization Progress in Indonesia ................................................................................... 5 2. The State of Play ............................................................................................................................ 6 3. The Current Legal Regime and Its Limits .................................................................................. 9 4. Benefits from Relaxing Ownership and Control of the Indonesian Airlines ...................... 10 5. The Way Forward and Conclusions ......................................................................................... 12 Table 1: Domestic Flights Market Share of Indonesian Airlines, 2017 ........................................... 7 Table 2: International Flights Market Share of Indonesian Airlines, 2017
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Department of Transportation Federal
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ORDER TRANSPORTATION JO 7340.2E FEDERAL AVIATION Effective Date: ADMINISTRATION July 24, 2014 Air Traffic Organization Policy Subject: Contractions Includes Change 1 dated 11/13/14 https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/atpubs/CNT/3-3.HTM A 3- Company Country Telephony Ltr AAA AVICON AVIATION CONSULTANTS & AGENTS PAKISTAN AAB ABELAG AVIATION BELGIUM ABG AAC ARMY AIR CORPS UNITED KINGDOM ARMYAIR AAD MANN AIR LTD (T/A AMBASSADOR) UNITED KINGDOM AMBASSADOR AAE EXPRESS AIR, INC. (PHOENIX, AZ) UNITED STATES ARIZONA AAF AIGLE AZUR FRANCE AIGLE AZUR AAG ATLANTIC FLIGHT TRAINING LTD. UNITED KINGDOM ATLANTIC AAH AEKO KULA, INC D/B/A ALOHA AIR CARGO (HONOLULU, UNITED STATES ALOHA HI) AAI AIR AURORA, INC. (SUGAR GROVE, IL) UNITED STATES BOREALIS AAJ ALFA AIRLINES CO., LTD SUDAN ALFA SUDAN AAK ALASKA ISLAND AIR, INC. (ANCHORAGE, AK) UNITED STATES ALASKA ISLAND AAL AMERICAN AIRLINES INC. UNITED STATES AMERICAN AAM AIM AIR REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA AIM AIR AAN AMSTERDAM AIRLINES B.V. NETHERLANDS AMSTEL AAO ADMINISTRACION AERONAUTICA INTERNACIONAL, S.A. MEXICO AEROINTER DE C.V. AAP ARABASCO AIR SERVICES SAUDI ARABIA ARABASCO AAQ ASIA ATLANTIC AIRLINES CO., LTD THAILAND ASIA ATLANTIC AAR ASIANA AIRLINES REPUBLIC OF KOREA ASIANA AAS ASKARI AVIATION (PVT) LTD PAKISTAN AL-AAS AAT AIR CENTRAL ASIA KYRGYZSTAN AAU AEROPA S.R.L. ITALY AAV ASTRO AIR INTERNATIONAL, INC. PHILIPPINES ASTRO-PHIL AAW AFRICAN AIRLINES CORPORATION LIBYA AFRIQIYAH AAX ADVANCE AVIATION CO., LTD THAILAND ADVANCE AVIATION AAY ALLEGIANT AIR, INC. (FRESNO, CA) UNITED STATES ALLEGIANT AAZ AEOLUS AIR LIMITED GAMBIA AEOLUS ABA AERO-BETA GMBH & CO., STUTTGART GERMANY AEROBETA ABB AFRICAN BUSINESS AND TRANSPORTATIONS DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF AFRICAN BUSINESS THE CONGO ABC ABC WORLD AIRWAYS GUIDE ABD AIR ATLANTA ICELANDIC ICELAND ATLANTA ABE ABAN AIR IRAN (ISLAMIC REPUBLIC ABAN OF) ABF SCANWINGS OY, FINLAND FINLAND SKYWINGS ABG ABAKAN-AVIA RUSSIAN FEDERATION ABAKAN-AVIA ABH HOKURIKU-KOUKUU CO., LTD JAPAN ABI ALBA-AIR AVIACION, S.L.
    [Show full text]
  • Operation Management Is a Functional Field of Business with Clear Line Management Responsibilities
    7 CHAPTER II LITERATURE REVIEW 2.1 Operations Management Operations Management is defined as the design, operation, and improvement of the systems that create and deliver the firm’s primary products and services. Like marketing and finance, operation management is a functional field of business with clear line management responsibilities. This point is important because operations management is frequently confused with operation research and management science and industrial engineering (Chase, 2001, pp.6-7). Operations management decisions at the strategic level impact the company’s long-range effectiveness in terms of how it can address its customer’s needs. Thus, for the firm to succeed, these decisions must be in alignment with the corporate strategy. Decisions made at the strategic level become the fixed conditions or operating constrains under which the term must operate in both the intermediate and short term. At the next level in the decision-making process, tactical planning primarily addresses how to efficiently schedule material and labor within the constraints of previously made strategic decisions. Issues on which Operation Management concentrates on this level include: How many workers do we need? When do we need them? Should we work overtime or put on a second shift? When should we have material delivered? Should we have a finished goods inventory? These tactical 8 decisions, in turn, become the operating constraints under which operational planning and control decisions are made (Chase, 2001, p8). 2.2 Achieving Competitive Advantage through Operations Competitive advantage implies the creation of a system that has a unique advantage over its competitors. The idea is to create customer value in an efficient and sustainable way.
    [Show full text]
  • Managementinnovation Strategy to Face the Competition of Domesticcommercial Flight Business in Indonesia Case Study: Garuda Indonesia Airline
    MANAGEMENTINNOVATION STRATEGY TO FACE THE COMPETITION OF DOMESTICCOMMERCIAL FLIGHT BUSINESS IN INDONESIA CASE STUDY: GARUDA INDONESIA AIRLINE S. RENDY ARDIANSYAH Department of Engineering Management, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom E-mail: [email protected] Abstract- Innovation is an essential part to be done bycompanies in order to survive for the tight competition in business industry. Being innovative does not just creating new product using the expertise of market researchers, and product developers. It also involves using capabilities of everyone in organisation to achieve the process that help new product to reach the market effectively and efficiently. Garuda Indonesiabecomes one of many companies that successfully innovate in their core business. They do a good innovation in their marketing strategy as well as in the company's management structure. In thispaper, a review of selected innovation strategy has been undertaken by Garuda Indonesia that can provide a competitive advantage and sustainability in the global market. Based on the literature review, a framework has been developed with key factors/enablers that determine the resilience and competitiveness of innovation strategy of Garuda Indonesia. This framework has been empirically studied by collecting data from annual report, and data from company. It involves a sample of competitor and provides further insight into the key characteristics associated with resilience and competitiveness of Garuda Indonesia airline that are influenced by advances
    [Show full text]
  • Global Volatility Steadies the Climb
    WORLD AIRLINER CENSUS Global volatility steadies the climb Cirium Fleet Forecast’s latest outlook sees heady growth settling down to trend levels, with economic slowdown, rising oil prices and production rate challenges as factors Narrowbodies including A321neo will dominate deliveries over 2019-2038 Airbus DAN THISDELL & CHRIS SEYMOUR LONDON commercial jets and turboprops across most spiking above $100/barrel in mid-2014, the sectors has come down from a run of heady Brent Crude benchmark declined rapidly to a nybody who has been watching growth years, slowdown in this context should January 2016 low in the mid-$30s; the subse- the news for the past year cannot be read as a return to longer-term averages. In quent upturn peaked in the $80s a year ago. have missed some recurring head- other words, in commercial aviation, slow- Following a long dip during the second half Alines. In no particular order: US- down is still a long way from downturn. of 2018, oil has this year recovered to the China trade war, potential US-Iran hot war, And, Cirium observes, “a slowdown in high-$60s prevailing in July. US-Mexico trade tension, US-Europe trade growth rates should not be a surprise”. Eco- tension, interest rates rising, Chinese growth nomic indicators are showing “consistent de- RECESSION WORRIES stumbling, Europe facing populist backlash, cline” in all major regions, and the World What comes next is anybody’s guess, but it is longest economic recovery in history, US- Trade Organization’s global trade outlook is at worth noting that the sharp drop in prices that Canada commerce friction, bond and equity its weakest since 2010.
    [Show full text]