List Published on 24 July 2008
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Liste-Exploitants-Aeronefs.Pdf
EN EN EN COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES Brussels, XXX C(2009) XXX final COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No xxx/2009 of on the list of aircraft operators which performed an aviation activity listed in Annex I to Directive 2003/87/EC on or after 1 January 2006 specifying the administering Member State for each aircraft operator (Text with EEA relevance) EN EN COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No xxx/2009 of on the list of aircraft operators which performed an aviation activity listed in Annex I to Directive 2003/87/EC on or after 1 January 2006 specifying the administering Member State for each aircraft operator (Text with EEA relevance) THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, Having regard to Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 October 2003 establishing a system for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community and amending Council Directive 96/61/EC1, and in particular Article 18a(3)(a) thereof, Whereas: (1) Directive 2003/87/EC, as amended by Directive 2008/101/EC2, includes aviation activities within the scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community (hereinafter the "Community scheme"). (2) In order to reduce the administrative burden on aircraft operators, Directive 2003/87/EC provides for one Member State to be responsible for each aircraft operator. Article 18a(1) and (2) of Directive 2003/87/EC contains the provisions governing the assignment of each aircraft operator to its administering Member State. The list of aircraft operators and their administering Member States (hereinafter "the list") should ensure that each operator knows which Member State it will be regulated by and that Member States are clear on which operators they should regulate. -
Formatisés De Réservation, Et Les Tarifs Intracommunautaires
N° 69 SÉNAT SESSION ORDINAIRE DE 2014-2015 Enregistré à la Présidence du Sénat le 29 octobre 2014 RAPPORT FAIT au nom de la commission des affaires étrangères, de la défense et des forces armées (1) sur le projet de loi autorisant la ratification de l’ accord relatif aux services de transport aérien entre le Gouvernement de la République française et le Gouvernement de la République gabonaise , Par M. Jacques LEGENDRE, Sénateur (1) Cette commission est composée de : M. Jean-Pierre Raffarin , président ; MM. Christian Cambon, Daniel Reiner, Jacques Gautier, Aymeri de Montesquiou, Mmes Josette Durrieu, Michelle Demessine, MM. Xavier Pintat, Gilbert Roger, Robert Hue, Mme Leila Aïchi , vice-présidents ; M. André Trillard, Mmes Hélène Conway-Mouret, Joëlle Garriaud-Maylam, MM. Joël Guerriau, Alain Néri , secrétaires ; MM. Michel Billout, Jean-Marie Bockel, Michel Boutant, Jean-Pierre Cantegrit, Bernard Cazeau, Pierre Charon, Robert del Picchia, Jean-Paul Emorine, Philippe Esnol, Hubert Falco, Bernard Fournier, Jean-Paul Fournier, Jacques Gillot, Mme Éliane Giraud, M. Gaëtan Gorce, Mme Nathalie Goulet, M. Alain Gournac, Mme Sylvie Goy-Chavent, MM. Jean- Pierre Grand, Jean-Noël Guérini, Didier Guillaume, Mme Gisèle Jourda, M. Alain Joyandet, Mme Christiane Kammermann, M. Antoine Karam, Mme Bariza Khiari, MM. Robert Laufoaulu, Jacques Legendre, Jeanny Lorgeoux, Claude Malhuret, Jean-Pierre Masseret, Rachel Mazuir, Christian Namy, Claude Nougein, Philippe Paul, Mme Marie-Françoise Perol-Dumont, MM. Cédric Perrin, Jean-Vincent Placé, Yves Pozzo di Borgo, Henri de Raincourt, Alex Türk . Voir le(s) numéro(s) : Sénat : 371 (2013-2014) et 70 (2014-2015) - 3 - SOMMAIRE Pages INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................... 5 PREMIÈRE PARTIE : UN CADRE CONVENTIONNEL DES SERVICES AÉRIENS ANCIEN ................................................................................................................................... -
Foreign ICAO 3LD Additions, Deletions, and Modifications (Excluding U.S.)
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION N JO 7340.470 NOTICE FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION Air Traffic Organization Policy Effective Date: July 11, 2018 Cancellation Date: July 11, 2019 SUBJ: Foreign ICAO 3LD Additions, Deletions, and Modifications (excluding U.S.) 1. Purpose of This Notice. This notice modifies FAA Order JO 7340.2, Contractions, Chapter 3, Sections 1, 2, and 3, !CAO Aircraft Company Three-Letter Identifier and/or Telephony Designator. This notice reflects recent changes initiated by countries other than the United States (U.S.) including new ICAO three letter designators (3LDs), deletions ofdefunct ICAO 3LDs, and modifications to ICAO 3LDs, associated telephonies, and companies/agencies. This Notice supplements FAA Order JO 7340.2 until the additions and modifications are incorporated into the Order. This Notice does not replace or substitute for GENOTs issued by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Air Traffic Organization (ATO) for ICAO 3LDs assigned and authorized for U.S. aircraft operators. 2. Audience. This notice applies to the following Air Traffic Organization (ATO) service units: Air Traffic Services, and System Operations Services; ATO Safety and Technical Training; and all associated air traffic control facilities. This notice is informational in nature and does not require documentation as supplemental training in FAA Form 3120-1, Training and Proficiency Record. 3. Where Can I Find This Notice? This notice is available on the MyFAA employee website at https://employees.faa.gov/tools_resources/orders_ notices/ and on the air traffic publications website at http://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/. 4. Source Document. The source document for the ICAO 3LD additions and modifications contained in this notice is ICAO Document 8585, Designatorsfor Aircraft Operating Agencies, Aeronautical Authorities, and Services. -
Vol-5, Issue 2
International Journal of Management Sciences and Business Research, Feb-2016 ISSN (2226-8235) Vol-5, Issue 2 Analysis on the Factors Causing Airlines Bankruptcy: Cases in Indonesia Author’s Details: (1)Suharto Abdul Majid-Faculty of Economic and Business, Padjadjaran University, Bandung, Indonesia (2) Sucherly - Faculty of Economic and Business, Padjadjaran University, Bandung, Indonesia (3) Umi Kaltum- Faculty of Economic and Business, Padjadjaran University, Bandung, Indonesia Abstract the high growth of national aviation services after the aviation deregulation in 2000 has given a positive impact on the increase of national economic activities, especially in tour and trade. In the same time, however, it negatively impacts the aviation business itself, making many airline companies stop their operation and then go to bankruptcy. The aim of this research is to analyze the factors causing bankruptcy to some national airline companies in Indonesia after the aviation deregulation in the periods of 2001-2010 and 2011-2015. It is an exploratory research with a qualitative descriptive approach emphasizing on evaluating the factors causing bankruptcy to a number of domestic airlines in Indonesia. The method of data collection is an interview with the format of focus group discussion (FGD), while the data analysis uses factor analysis method. The results of this research show that there are two main factors that cause bankruptcy to a number of domestic airlines in Indonesia. They are both internal and external factors of the companies. Key words: Airline companies bankruptcy, internal factors, and external factors. INTRODUCTION Since the implementation of the national aviation deregulation policy in 2000, the growth of aviation business in Indonesia increases rapidly. -
U.S. Department of Transportation Federal
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ORDER TRANSPORTATION JO 7340.2E FEDERAL AVIATION Effective Date: ADMINISTRATION July 24, 2014 Air Traffic Organization Policy Subject: Contractions Includes Change 1 dated 11/13/14 https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/atpubs/CNT/3-3.HTM A 3- Company Country Telephony Ltr AAA AVICON AVIATION CONSULTANTS & AGENTS PAKISTAN AAB ABELAG AVIATION BELGIUM ABG AAC ARMY AIR CORPS UNITED KINGDOM ARMYAIR AAD MANN AIR LTD (T/A AMBASSADOR) UNITED KINGDOM AMBASSADOR AAE EXPRESS AIR, INC. (PHOENIX, AZ) UNITED STATES ARIZONA AAF AIGLE AZUR FRANCE AIGLE AZUR AAG ATLANTIC FLIGHT TRAINING LTD. UNITED KINGDOM ATLANTIC AAH AEKO KULA, INC D/B/A ALOHA AIR CARGO (HONOLULU, UNITED STATES ALOHA HI) AAI AIR AURORA, INC. (SUGAR GROVE, IL) UNITED STATES BOREALIS AAJ ALFA AIRLINES CO., LTD SUDAN ALFA SUDAN AAK ALASKA ISLAND AIR, INC. (ANCHORAGE, AK) UNITED STATES ALASKA ISLAND AAL AMERICAN AIRLINES INC. UNITED STATES AMERICAN AAM AIM AIR REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA AIM AIR AAN AMSTERDAM AIRLINES B.V. NETHERLANDS AMSTEL AAO ADMINISTRACION AERONAUTICA INTERNACIONAL, S.A. MEXICO AEROINTER DE C.V. AAP ARABASCO AIR SERVICES SAUDI ARABIA ARABASCO AAQ ASIA ATLANTIC AIRLINES CO., LTD THAILAND ASIA ATLANTIC AAR ASIANA AIRLINES REPUBLIC OF KOREA ASIANA AAS ASKARI AVIATION (PVT) LTD PAKISTAN AL-AAS AAT AIR CENTRAL ASIA KYRGYZSTAN AAU AEROPA S.R.L. ITALY AAV ASTRO AIR INTERNATIONAL, INC. PHILIPPINES ASTRO-PHIL AAW AFRICAN AIRLINES CORPORATION LIBYA AFRIQIYAH AAX ADVANCE AVIATION CO., LTD THAILAND ADVANCE AVIATION AAY ALLEGIANT AIR, INC. (FRESNO, CA) UNITED STATES ALLEGIANT AAZ AEOLUS AIR LIMITED GAMBIA AEOLUS ABA AERO-BETA GMBH & CO., STUTTGART GERMANY AEROBETA ABB AFRICAN BUSINESS AND TRANSPORTATIONS DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF AFRICAN BUSINESS THE CONGO ABC ABC WORLD AIRWAYS GUIDE ABD AIR ATLANTA ICELANDIC ICELAND ATLANTA ABE ABAN AIR IRAN (ISLAMIC REPUBLIC ABAN OF) ABF SCANWINGS OY, FINLAND FINLAND SKYWINGS ABG ABAKAN-AVIA RUSSIAN FEDERATION ABAKAN-AVIA ABH HOKURIKU-KOUKUU CO., LTD JAPAN ABI ALBA-AIR AVIACION, S.L. -
Destination Green Driving Progress Through Action on Aviation and the Environment
DESTINATION GREEN DRIVING PROGRESS THROUGH ACTION ON AVIATION AND THE ENVIRONMENT STATE PROFILE SPECIAL FEATURES: CAMEROON & MALAYSIA STATE CO2 ACTION PLANS CAEP/9 ACHIEVEMENTS ACI AIRPORT CARBON ACCREDITATION Vol. 68, No. 2 Contents Message from the Secretary General Reviewing the progress achieved since 2010 on the environmental THE ICAO JOURNAL 4 objectives established by the 37th Assembly, as well as the challenges which VOlume 68, Number 2, 2013 lay before us in this important area of international aviation cooperation. Editorial ICAO Communications Unit Driving progress through action on aviation and the environment Tel: +1 (514) 954-8221 Jane Hupe, ICAO’s Chief, Environment Branch, discusses the key elements www.icao.int 6 [email protected] contributing to rapid environmental progress towards the sustainable twitter.com/icao future of international aviation, including the work of the Committee on Bang Marketing Aviation Environmental Protection (CAEP). Stéphanie Kennan Tel: +1 (514) 849-2264 State Action Plans take aim at reducing CO 2 emissions E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.bang-marketing.com As of February 2013, 59 States covering 77.4 per cent of global inter- 10 national air traffic had already submitted Action Plans on to ICAO on Advertising their CO emission reduction activities. The ICAO Journal reports on FCM Communications Inc. 2 Yves Allard recent progress being made by Canada, European States, Indonesia, Tel: +1 (450) 677-3535 UAE, Uganda and Venezuela. Fax: +1 (450) 677-4445 E-mail: [email protected] Towards quieter skies and greener aircraft Submissions The Ninth Meeting of the Committee on Aviation Environmental Protection The Journal encourages submissions from interested 16 (CAEP/9) agreed on a comprehensive set of recommendations that will individuals, organizations and States wishing to share updates, perspectives or analysis related to global help ICAO to fulfill its mandate on aviation environmental protection. -
Prior Compliance List of Aircraft Operators Specifying the Administering Member State for Each Aircraft Operator – June 2014
Prior compliance list of aircraft operators specifying the administering Member State for each aircraft operator – June 2014 Inclusion in the prior compliance list allows aircraft operators to know which Member State will most likely be attributed to them as their administering Member State so they can get in contact with the competent authority of that Member State to discuss the requirements and the next steps. Due to a number of reasons, and especially because a number of aircraft operators use services of management companies, some of those operators have not been identified in the latest update of the EEA- wide list of aircraft operators adopted on 5 February 2014. The present version of the prior compliance list includes those aircraft operators, which have submitted their fleet lists between December 2013 and January 2014. BELGIUM CRCO Identification no. Operator Name State of the Operator 31102 ACT AIRLINES TURKEY 7649 AIRBORNE EXPRESS UNITED STATES 33612 ALLIED AIR LIMITED NIGERIA 29424 ASTRAL AVIATION LTD KENYA 31416 AVIA TRAFFIC COMPANY TAJIKISTAN 30020 AVIASTAR-TU CO. RUSSIAN FEDERATION 40259 BRAVO CARGO UNITED ARAB EMIRATES 908 BRUSSELS AIRLINES BELGIUM 25996 CAIRO AVIATION EGYPT 4369 CAL CARGO AIRLINES ISRAEL 29517 CAPITAL AVTN SRVCS NETHERLANDS 39758 CHALLENGER AERO PHILIPPINES f11336 CORPORATE WINGS LLC UNITED STATES 32909 CRESAIR INC UNITED STATES 32432 EGYPTAIR CARGO EGYPT f12977 EXCELLENT INVESTMENT UNITED STATES LLC 32486 FAYARD ENTERPRISES UNITED STATES f11102 FedEx Express Corporate UNITED STATES Aviation 13457 Flying -
Airliner Census Western-Built Jet and Turboprop Airliners
World airliner census Western-built jet and turboprop airliners AEROSPATIALE (NORD) 262 7 Lufthansa (600R) 2 Biman Bangladesh Airlines (300) 4 Tarom (300) 2 Africa 3 MNG Airlines (B4) 2 China Eastern Airlines (200) 3 Turkish Airlines (THY) (200) 1 Equatorial Int’l Airlines (A) 1 MNG Airlines (B4 Freighter) 5 Emirates (300) 1 Turkish Airlines (THY) (300) 5 Int’l Trans Air Business (A) 1 MNG Airlines (F4) 3 Emirates (300F) 3 Turkish Airlines (THY) (300F) 1 Trans Service Airlift (B) 1 Monarch Airlines (600R) 4 Iran Air (200) 6 Uzbekistan Airways (300) 3 North/South America 4 Olympic Airlines (600R) 1 Iran Air (300) 2 White (300) 1 Aerolineas Sosa (A) 3 Onur Air (600R) 6 Iraqi Airways (300) (5) North/South America 81 RACSA (A) 1 Onur Air (B2) 1 Jordan Aviation (200) 1 Aerolineas Argentinas (300) 2 AEROSPATIALE (SUD) CARAVELLE 2 Onur Air (B4) 5 Jordan Aviation (300) 1 Air Transat (300) 11 Europe 2 Pan Air (B4 Freighter) 2 Kuwait Airways (300) 4 FedEx Express (200F) 49 WaltAir (10B) 1 Saga Airlines (B2) 1 Mahan Air (300) 2 FedEx Express (300) 7 WaltAir (11R) 1 TNT Airways (B4 Freighter) 4 Miat Mongolian Airlines (300) 1 FedEx Express (300F) 12 AIRBUS A300 408 (8) North/South America 166 (7) Pakistan Int’l Airlines (300) 12 AIRBUS A318-100 30 (48) Africa 14 Aero Union (B4 Freighter) 4 Royal Jordanian (300) 4 Europe 13 (9) Egyptair (600R) 1 American Airlines (600R) 34 Royal Jordanian (300F) 2 Air France 13 (5) Egyptair (600R Freighter) 1 ASTAR Air Cargo (B4 Freighter) 6 Yemenia (300) 4 Tarom (4) Egyptair (B4 Freighter) 2 Express.net Airlines -
Bab I Pendahuluan
BAB I PENDAHULUAN 1.1. Latar Belakang Dalam menjalani kegiatan usaha atau bisnis setiap orang atau badan usaha baik badan usaha perseorangan maupun badan usaha berbentuk badan hukum memerlukan modal usaha baik uang atau dana maupun barang, tetapi dalam kenyataannya ada perusahaan yang memiliki cukup modal dan ada juga perusahan yang terbatas modalnya sehingga perlu mendapat bantuan dari pihak ketiga baik dari lembaga pembiayaan bank dan non bank maupun dari perseorangan. Perusahaan yang melaksanakan kegiatan usaha tidak semua dapat berjalan mulus atau berjalan lancar, khususnya dalam bisnis angkutan udara memiliki risiko yang sangat besar, ketatnya persaingan disertai dengan ketentuan dan permodalan besar menuntut pengelola bisnis ini harus pintar mencari celah demi keuntungan. Beberapa pengusaha yang mencoba peruntungan dalam bisnis padat modal ini, namun akhirnya harus rela melikuidasi perusahaan atau gagal dalam bisnis di industri penerbangan nasional, yaitu:1 1. Air Wagon International Airline (Awair) Kurang dari sebulan sebelum pengangkatan Abdurrahman Wahid sebagai Presiden Republik Indonesia ke-4 bersama dengan 4 (empat) orang pendiri lainnya membangun maskapai penerbangan Awair. Maskapai ini 1 Liputan6, “Pengusaha-pengusahan yang Gagal di Bisnis Penerbangan”, https://www.liputan6.com/bisnis/read/504571/pengusaha-pengusaha-yang-gagal-di-bisnis- penerbangan, Diakses pada tanggal 12 Juni 2018 pukul 20.00. 1 memperoleh izin dari Departemen Perhubungan pada tahun 2000. Setelah pengangkatan Abdurrahman Wahid sebagai Presiden RI ke-4, ia mengundurkan diri dari jajaran perusahaan. Maskapai penerbangan ini hanya dapat melayani pengguna jasa angkutan udara selama setahun sejak memperoleh izin dari Departemen Perhubungan hingga akhirnya menghentikan operasional maskapai penerbangan tersebut dan diambil alih oleh Air Asia. Investor baru ini pun mengubah orientasi bisnis perusahaan menjadi maskapai penerbangan berbiaya rendah dan mengganti nama Awair menjadi PT Indonesia Air Asia. -
THE PROTECTION of CONSUMER RIGHTS for AVIATION SAFETY and SECURITY in INDONESIA and MALAYSIA Annalisa Yahanan1, Febrian2, and Rohani Abdul Rahim3
[21-34] Annalisa Yahanan, Febrian, and Rohani Abdul Rahim Editorial Office: Faculty of Law, Sriwijaya UniversityJalan Srijaya Negara, Palembang, South Sumatra 30139, Indonesia. Phone: +62711-580063Fax: +62711-581179 ISSN Print: 2541-5298 E-mail: [email protected]| [email protected] ISSN Online: 2541-6464 Website: http://journal.fh.unsri.ac.id/index.php/sriwijayalawreview THE PROTECTION OF CONSUMER RIGHTS FOR AVIATION SAFETY AND SECURITY IN INDONESIA AND MALAYSIA Annalisa Yahanan1, Febrian2, and Rohani Abdul Rahim3 Abstract: Indonesia and Malaysia have a good potency for cooperation in aviation industry. It can be seen in the establishing two aviation companies namely PT. Indonesia Air Asia and Ma- lindo which both are low-cost carrier. These aviation industries are categorized as low-cost car- rier, however safety and security are absolute factors because these are rights for consumers. This article will describe further about safety and security standard; protecting the rights for consumers in connection with safety aviation in Indonesia and Malaysia from the Consumer Protection Law and the Aviation Law. As a result of the research shows that safety standard passenger for air transportation in airport covers information and safety facility in the shape of availability of the emergency safety tools (fires, accidents and natural disasters); information, area and health facility; and healthcare workers. Moreover, safety standards for passenger in an aircraft include information and safety facility in the shape of availability information and the emergency safety tools for passenger in an aircraft. The protection for consumer rights for safe- ty flight in Indonesia as follows: aviation industry has obligation to fulfill minimum standard of safety and security; consumers must be safety from false information which raises concern; air- craft operation which endanger of the passenger; and consumer protection in operating the elec- tronic device which endanger flight. -
Cb(1)752/10-11(01)
第 1 頁，共 2 頁 Home About Law and Regulation Enforcement Advocacy International CB(1Publications)752/10-11(0Merger1) Cont LANGUAGE OPTIONS PRICE FIXING ON FUEL SURCHARGE BY INDONESIAN AVIATION COMPANIES The Commission for the Supervision of Business Supervision POPULAR PO concluded its examination and issued a Decision on the violation CATEGORIES of article 5 and 21 of the competition law, the Law n.5/1999. The ADecade of violation engaged in the price fixing on fuel surcharge by thirteen Competition Po Article aviation (airline) companies, namely PT Garuda Indonesia; PT Sriwijaya Air; PT Merpati Nusantara Airlines; PT Mandala Airlines; Audience with Events Sulawesi PT Riau Airlines; PT Travel Express Aviation Services; PT Lion Headline Mentari Airlines; PT Wing Abadi Airlines; PT Metro Batavia; PT Merger and Ac Kartika Airlines; PT Linus Airways; PT Trigana Air Service; and PT News Indonesia AirAsia. Price Fixing Aviation Comp Press Release Finding on the price fixing Guarding KPPU ARCHIVES There were written agreement on the determination of fuel surcharge price on 4 May 2006 signed by the Chairperson of The Case of Al Indonesia Aviation Company Association (INACA), their Secretary December 2010 General, and nine aviation companies (PT Mandala Airlines, PT November 2010 Merpati Nusantara Airlines, PT Dirgantara Air Service, PT FEATURED V Sriwijaya Air, PT Pelita Air Service, PT Lion Mentari Air, PT Batavia October 2010 Air, PT Indonesia Air Transport, and PT Garuda Indonesia). The August 2010 agreement agreed upon the implementation of fuel surcharge from 10 May 2006 with certain amount (IDR 20,000/passenger) July 2010 and impose by all flight schedule. -
Black List of the Air Operators
25th June 2015 LEGAL ANNOUNCEMENT The civil air transportation authorities of each member states of the European Union may check only the aircrafts of the airlines that provide flights to and from the airports of the European Union; and due to random nature of such checks, it is not possible to check each aircraft that lands at each European Union airport. The fact that the airline is not indicated on the list of the Association does not automatically mean that such company complies with the respective safety standards. If the company that is currently indicated on the list of the Association assumes that it complies with the necessary technical standards and requirements indicated in the respective international safety standards, it might request the Committee to initiate the proceedings to withdraw it from the list. All possible effort was made to verify the exact identity of all airlines indicated on the list of the Association – particularly with regard to the following properties: specific (and unique) letter codes for each airline by the ICAO organisation of the country that has issued the certificate as well as the certificate numbers (or the operating licence) of the air transport operator. Nevertheless, the complete verification was not in all cases possible due to the general lack of information on some airlines that could be borderline with the respected international system of the air transportation or entirely inconsistent with it. For this reason we cannot exclude the fact that there might be companies that conduct their business activities in good faith under the same business name as some of the airlines indicated in the list of the Association.