DOCSLIB.ORG

Garuda Indonesia (GIAA IJ) Buy

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Garuda Indonesia (GIAA IJ) Buy Indonesia Initiating Coverage 3 October 2019 Transportation | Airline Garuda Indonesia (GIAA IJ) Buy Flying High; Initiate At BUY Target Price (Return) IDR750 (+51%) Price: IDR498 Market Cap: USD0.91bn 14.3bn/1.0m Avg Daily Turnover (IDR/USD) Initiating coverage with a BUY on recent constructive structural Analysts changes, with a 12-month TP of IDR750, derived from a 10-year DCF (WACC: 9.3%, terminal growth: 4%), 51% upside. Post multiple accidents, the Jessica Pratiwi Government has raised the price floor for commercial airfare to 35% of the +6221 5093 9845 price ceiling, and mandated regular maintenance, which should benefit GMFI, [email protected] GIAA’s subsidiary. A higher ASP and fuel management through capacity adjustments have resulted in much higher profitability – 7M19 NPAT reached management’s FY target. It is trading at an attractive 8.1x 2020F P/E. Michael W Setjoadi Variable price floor to preserve profitable margins. The higher ticket price +6221 5093 9844 floor regulation has increased the industry’s profitability, including Garuda [email protected] Indonesia’s low-cost carrier (LCC) – Citilink from a USD11.7m loss in 1H18 to USD27.7m profit in 1H19 (contributing to 49% of 1H19 total EBIT). Regulators will review the price floor every three months, or whenever there is a spike in Marco Antonius production cost of >10%. We believe this is more proactive than the previous +6221 5093 9849 regulation that reviewed the price floor on an annual basis. [email protected] Rising passenger yield on price competition. Following the higher price Share Performance (%) floor, GIAA has adjusted its prices by +25% for Garuda Indonesia, and +40% for Citilink, resulting in much higher passenger yield of US cents 10.9/km YTD 1m 3m 6m 12m (+38.9% YoY) and US cents 7.98/km (+57% YoY) as at 8M19. This led to Absolute 67.1 1.6 31.7 0.8 139.4 higher YoY EBIT margin of USD87m in 1H19 (vs USD148m loss in 1H18), Relative 69.4 5.4 36.9 7.3 136.4 despite passenger traffic correcting -19% YoY as variable cost accounted for 52-wk Price low/high (IDR) 199 - 635 75% of the total cost. The decline in domestic passenger volume has also GIAA’s share price (IDR) slowed to 15% YoY in 8M19 vs 21% YoY in 1H19, indicating that the market IDR has started to adapt to the current price structure. 650 Lower maintenance funds to deleverage. Based on operating lease arrangements for aircraft, there are USD1.6bn of maintenance reserve funds 550 placed under an escrow account. Management has been negotiating to lower 450 498 the reserve amount and free up some cash in order to refinance the 350 upcoming maturing sukuk in 1H20 (USD500m). This was seen in a decline of additional reserves paid amounting to USD148m (-16% YoY) in 1H19. 250 Partnering with GoJek to further boost cargo revenue, targeting to grow 150 by 30% YoY. Growing e-commerce penetration, rising demand for perishable Jul-18 Jul-19 Jan-18 Jan-19 Jun-18 Jun-19 Oct-18 Apr-18 Apr-19 Feb-18 Sep-18 Feb-19 Sep-19 Dec-18 Aug-18 Aug-19 Nov-18 Mar-18 Mar-19 May-18 goods, and increased demand in express delivery should be the strong May-19 foundation for the duopoly airfreight industry. With several of these initiatives Source: RHB, Bloomberg as at 2 Oct 2019 (ie cargo village, #tauBeres, additional freight cargo), cargo business contribution should reach 10% of topline by 2022F. Positive correlation on airline’s passenger yield and Trading at undemanding 8.1x 2020F P/E. This is >30% discount compared GIAA’s EBIT margin USDc/km % to regional aviation peers. Corporate governance overhang should also be 8.0 8.0 over, as the company is expected to soon appoint a new Big-4 accounting 6.0 7.5 firm post heavy fines from the Financial Services Authority (OJK) relating to 4.0 its 2018 financial report. 2.0 7.0 - Forecasts and Valuation Dec-17 Dec-18 Dec-19F Dec-20F Dec-21F 6.5 -2.0 Total turnover (USDbn) 4,177.3 4,373.2 4,706.1 4,895.1 5,093.4 -4.0 Recurring net profit (USDbn) (213.4) (175.0) 95.8 115.3 129.4 6.0 -6.0 Recurring net profit growth N/A N/A N/A 20.4 12.2 2015 2016 2017 2018 1H19 2019F 2020F 2021F 2022F (%)Recurring P/E (x) N/A N/A 9.5 8.1 7.2 Passengers yield - LHS EBIT margin (%) - RHS P/B (x) 1.0 1.3 1.1 0.9 0.8 P/CF (x) N/A N/A 0.0043 0.0068 0.0080 Source: Company data, RHB Dividend Yield (%) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EV/EBITDA (x) N/A N/A 8.2 8.6 8.3 Return on equity (%) (23.1) (24.5) 13.4 10.7 10.7 Net gearing (%) 163.1 225.1 160.8 131.8 110.0 Interest coverage (x) N/A N/A 2.3 2.0 2.4 Source: RHB, Bloomberg; Note: As at 2 Oct 2019 See important disclosures at the end of this report 1 Garuda Indonesia Indonesia Initiating Coverage 3 October 2019 Transportation | Airline Table Of Contents Financial Exhibits 3 Investment Thesis 4 Structural changes to improve profitability 4 Higher prices, lower volume; but also lower costs = higher profit 5 Strong growth of cargo business 9 How likely will GIAA acquire Sriwijaya? 11 Other revenue streams 12 Indonesia’s Airline Industry 14 Case Study: Malaysia And Thailand 18 Financial Forecasts 20 Valuation And SD Bands 26 Regional Peer Comparison 28 Risks 29 Company Profile 31 Management Profile 32 See important disclosures at the end of this report 2 Garuda Indonesia Indonesia Initiating Coverage 3 October 2019 Transportation | Airline Financial Exhibits Asia Financial Summary 2017 2018 2019F 2020F 2021F Indonesia Recurring EPS (USD) (0.0084) (0.0069) 0.0037 0.0043 0.0049 Transportation Recurring EPS (IDR) (119.6) (99.0) 52.9 62.2 69.8 Airlines DPS (USD) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 BVPS (USD) 0.0346 0.0264 0.0336 0.0379 0.0428 Major shareholders (%) DPS (IDR) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Republic of Indonesia 60.5 Trans Airways 25.6 BVPS (IDR) 494.3 377.5 479.9 542.1 611.8 Valuation Metrics 2017 2018 2019F 2020F 2021F Recurring P/E (x) (4.2) (5.1) 9.5 8.1 7.2 P/B (x) 1.0 1.3 1.1 0.9 0.8 Dividend yield (%) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EV/EBIT (x) (36.4) (10.7) 11.1 12.3 12.2 EV/EBITDA (x) (395.2) (17.0) 8.2 8.6 8.3 Valuation basis EV/EBITDAR (x) 2.1 2.3 1.7 1.7 1.7 Our 12-month TP of ID750 is based on 10-year DCF (WACC: 9.3% and terminal growth: 4%), translating to 2020F P/E of 12x. Income Statement (USDbn) 2017 2018 2019F 2020F 2021F Operating revenue 4,177 4,373 4,706 4,895 5,093 Key drivers EBIT (60) (206) 197 178 180 EBITDA (6) (129) 269 256 264 i. High passengers yield; ii. Low-base passenger traffic; EBITDAR 1,058 952 1,271 1,260 1,268 iii. Growth in the cargo business; Depreciation 681 758 830 907 991 iv. Increase in utilisation rate. Net interest inc./ (expense) (82) (82) (82) (84) (74) Other income/ (expense) 16 67 47 52 57 Key risks Pre-tax profit (158) (221) 161 146 163 i. Potential unfavourable regulation change; Taxes (55) 46 (34) (30) (34) ii. Increasing competition from International airline; iii. Higher global fuel price. Net profit (213) (175) 128 115 129 Company Profile Cash Flow (USDbn) 2017 2018 2019F 2020F 2021F Founded in 1947, Garuda Indonesia is the national Change in working capital (39) 313 (40) 22 29 flag carrier of Indonesia. The company offers domestic and international flights, online check in, and Cash flow from operations (200) 211 156 213 239 associated services for passengers, baggage, and Capex 159 153 170 177 184 cargo. Cash flow from investing activities (259) (375) 12 (116) (174) Dividends paid 0 0 0 0 0 Cash flow from financing activities 186 110 (143) (206) (184) Cash at beginning of period 579 306 251 276 167 Net change in cash (273) (55) 25 (109) (119) Ending balance cash 306 251 276 167 48 Balance Sheet (USDbn) 2017 2018 2019F 2020F 2021F Total cash and cash equivalents 306 251 276 167 48 Tangible fixed assets 901 944 971 995 1,020 Total assets 3,763 4,168 4,141 4,091 4,084 Short-term debt 1,112 1,692 1,373 1,224 1,025 Total long-term debt 60 78 200 200 200 Total liabilities 2,826 3,437 3,213 3,043 2,901 Total equity 937 730 928 1,048 1,183 Minority interests 43 47 59 67 76 Total liabilities and equity 3,763 4,168 4,141 4,091 4,084 Key Metrics 2017 2018 2019F 2020F 2021F Revenue growth (%) 3.7 4.0 5.7 4.5 3.9 EPS growth (%) N/A N/A N/A (9.7) 12.2 EBIT margin (%) (1.4) (4.7) 4.2 3.6 3.5 EBITDA margin (%) (0.1) (3.0) 5.7 5.2 5.2 EBITDAR margin (%) 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.2 Net profit margin (%) (5.1) (4.0) 2.7 2.4 2.5 Dividend payout ratio (%) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Capex/sales (%) 3.8 3.5 3.6 3.6 3.6 Interest cover (x) (0.7) (2.4) 2.3 2.0 2.4 Cash conversion cycle (days) 58.1 100.5 98.4 96.5 94.5 Net gearing (%) 163.1 225.1 160.8 131.8 110.0 Source: Company data, RHB See important disclosures at the end of this report 3 Garuda Indonesia Indonesia Initiating Coverage 3 October 2019 Transportation | Airline Investment Thesis BUY – Turnaround story, earnings recovery ahead Initiate coverage with a BUY and 12-month TP of IDR750, 51% upside.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Bab Ii Sejarah Dan Perkembangan Garuda
    BAB II SEJARAH DAN PERKEMBANGAN GARUDA INDONESIA Pada bab dunia penulis akan menguaraikan ataupun membahas tentang kondisi dunia penerbangan indonesia serta penulis mengambil studi kasus dari salah satu maskapai penerbangan Indonesia yaitu PT. Garuda Indonesia (Persero) Tbk. Dan pada bab ini penulis akan membagi menjadi dua sub bab utama yaitu : Gambaran banyak tentang Garuda Indonesia dan perkembangan dari Garuda Indonesia. A. Sejarah Garuda Indonesia Garuda Indonesia adalah perusahaan penerbangan nasional yang dimiliki oleh indonesia serta maskapai pertama dan terbesar yang ada di Indonesia, Dengan tujuan serta pendekatan yang berorientasi untuk “melayani” serta Garuda Indonesia juga mempunyai slogan yaitu “The Airline Of Indonesia”. Garuda ini sendiri diambil dari nama burung, yaitu burung dari dewa Wisnu dalam legenda pewayangan. Sejarah perkembangan penerbangan dilakukan sejak dulu pada saat Indonesia sedang mempertahankan kemerdekaanya. Penerbangan komersial pertama yang dilakukan oleh Indonesia menggunakan pesawat DC-3 Dakota dengan registrasi RI 001 dari Calcutta ke Rangoon dan diberi nama “Indonesian Airways” dilakukan pada 26 Januari 1949 yang sekaligus juga menjadi hari jadi dari Garuda Indonesia.19 Serta di tahun yang sama yaitu pada tanggal 28 Desember 1949 pertama kalinya pesawat 19 Garuda Indonesia, Tentang Garuda Indonesia, https://www.garuda-indonesia.com/id/id/corporate- partners/company-profile/about/index.page?, di akses tanggal 09 Des. 16 Pukul 16:11 WIB 18 Garuda di cat dengan logo “Garuda Indonesian Airways” pesawat tipe Douglas DC- 3 dengan nomor registrasi PK-DPD, yang pada saat itu terbang dari Jakarta menuju Yogyakarta untuk menjemput presiden pertama yaitu Presiden Soekarno. Dan itulah penerbangan Garuda yang pertama dengan logo “Garuda Indonesian Airways” serta nama tersebut di berikan oleh Presiden Soekarno dan nama itu di perolehnya dari penyair terkenal “Noto Soeroto”.
    [Show full text]
  • Liste-Exploitants-Aeronefs.Pdf
    EN EN EN COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES Brussels, XXX C(2009) XXX final COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No xxx/2009 of on the list of aircraft operators which performed an aviation activity listed in Annex I to Directive 2003/87/EC on or after 1 January 2006 specifying the administering Member State for each aircraft operator (Text with EEA relevance) EN EN COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No xxx/2009 of on the list of aircraft operators which performed an aviation activity listed in Annex I to Directive 2003/87/EC on or after 1 January 2006 specifying the administering Member State for each aircraft operator (Text with EEA relevance) THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, Having regard to Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 October 2003 establishing a system for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community and amending Council Directive 96/61/EC1, and in particular Article 18a(3)(a) thereof, Whereas: (1) Directive 2003/87/EC, as amended by Directive 2008/101/EC2, includes aviation activities within the scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community (hereinafter the "Community scheme"). (2) In order to reduce the administrative burden on aircraft operators, Directive 2003/87/EC provides for one Member State to be responsible for each aircraft operator. Article 18a(1) and (2) of Directive 2003/87/EC contains the provisions governing the assignment of each aircraft operator to its administering Member State. The list of aircraft operators and their administering Member States (hereinafter "the list") should ensure that each operator knows which Member State it will be regulated by and that Member States are clear on which operators they should regulate.
    [Show full text]
  • My Personal Callsign List This List Was Not Designed for Publication However Due to Several Requests I Have Decided to Make It Downloadable
    - www.egxwinfogroup.co.uk - The EGXWinfo Group of Twitter Accounts - @EGXWinfoGroup on Twitter - My Personal Callsign List This list was not designed for publication however due to several requests I have decided to make it downloadable. It is a mixture of listed callsigns and logged callsigns so some have numbers after the callsign as they were heard. Use CTL+F in Adobe Reader to search for your callsign Callsign ICAO/PRI IATA Unit Type Based Country Type ABG AAB W9 Abelag Aviation Belgium Civil ARMYAIR AAC Army Air Corps United Kingdom Civil AgustaWestland Lynx AH.9A/AW159 Wildcat ARMYAIR 200# AAC 2Regt | AAC AH.1 AAC Middle Wallop United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 300# AAC 3Regt | AAC AgustaWestland AH-64 Apache AH.1 RAF Wattisham United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 400# AAC 4Regt | AAC AgustaWestland AH-64 Apache AH.1 RAF Wattisham United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 500# AAC 5Regt AAC/RAF Britten-Norman Islander/Defender JHCFS Aldergrove United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 600# AAC 657Sqn | JSFAW | AAC Various RAF Odiham United Kingdom Military Ambassador AAD Mann Air Ltd United Kingdom Civil AIGLE AZUR AAF ZI Aigle Azur France Civil ATLANTIC AAG KI Air Atlantique United Kingdom Civil ATLANTIC AAG Atlantic Flight Training United Kingdom Civil ALOHA AAH KH Aloha Air Cargo United States Civil BOREALIS AAI Air Aurora United States Civil ALFA SUDAN AAJ Alfa Airlines Sudan Civil ALASKA ISLAND AAK Alaska Island Air United States Civil AMERICAN AAL AA American Airlines United States Civil AM CORP AAM Aviation Management Corporation United States Civil
    [Show full text]
  • 1 1. PENDAHULUAN 1.1. Latar Belakang Masalah Seiring Dengan
    1. PENDAHULUAN 1.1. Latar Belakang Masalah Seiring dengan berjalannya waktu, persaingan industri dagang maupun jasa di Indonesia semakin lama kian keras persaingan satu dengan lainnya. Perusahaan baru terus bermunculan dan perusahaan lama akan tersingkir, jika tidak bisa berinovasi dalam memenuhi kebutuhan konsumen. Begitu juga dalam bidang penerbangan di Indonesia, yang semakin bersaing ketat karena meningkatnya jumlah pemakai transportasi jalur udara dari tahun ke tahun. Berdasarkan data dari PT (Persero) Angkasa Pura I dan II, disebutkan bahwa jumlah penumpang domestik dari Bandara Internasional Juanda Surabaya, mengalami peningkatan yang konsisten tiap tahunnya. Sebut saja pada tahun 2009, jumlah penumpang tercatat sebanyak 4.305.927 (Empat Juta Tiga Ratus Lima Ribu Sembilan Ratus Dua Puluh Tujuh) orang. Sedangkan di tahun 2013, mengalami kenaikan hingga tercatat sebanyak 7.264.393 (Tujuh Juta Dua Ratus Enam Puluh Empat Ribu Tiga Ratus Sembilan Puluh Tiga) orang. Berbicara tentang komponen dari maskapai penerbangan, bisa jadi berbeda antara satu dengan yang lain. Beberapa diantaranya seperti segi harga, Check In Counter, Boarding dan Seating, Inflight Service, Arrival, dan yang terakhir e- booking (sumber: Hall et al, 2002, p.4). Menyikapi peningkatan konsumen transportasi udara yang semakin meningkat pesat, beberapa maskapai besar di Indonesia mengeluarkan inovasi tersendiri. Yakni mendirikan anak perusahaan untuk memberikan second choice kepada masyarakat khususnya Indonesia untuk bisa menggunakan transportasi udara, dengan harga yang jauh lebih murah. Namun, dengan harga yang relatif terjangkau oleh masyarakat kelas bawah, tentunya memiliki kualitas berbeda dari perusahaan utama, yang banyak orang mengenalnya dengan nama Low Cost Carrier (LCC) atau Budget Airlines. Istilah Penerbangan “low cost” atau sering disebut LCC (Low Cost Carrier) merupakan model penerbangan dengan strategi penurunan operating cost.
    [Show full text]
  • Mandatory Passenger Requirements on Lion Air Group Air Travel Last Updated August 24, 2021 | 23:00 WIB (GMT+ 07)
    www.lionair.co.id @lionairgroup (+6221) 6379 8000 www.batikair.com @batikair @lionairgroup Lion Air Group Lion Air Group 0804 1 778899 PRESS RELEASE Latest Flight Information: Mandatory Passenger Requirements on Lion Air Group Air Travel Last Updated August 24, 2021 | 23:00 WIB (GMT+ 07) Running Period: 25 - 30 August 2021 “Please Pay Attention to and Meet the Health Test Conditions, Validity Period and Other Specified Requirements Documents” Flying is Safe and Healthy: Use of Caring Apps Protect Before Departure, as part of Digitalization Gradually. J A K A R T A – August 25, 2021. Lion Air (JT flight code), Wings Air (IW flight code), Batik Air (ID flight code) member of Lion Air Group said that the entire implementation of Lion Air Group flight operations while maintaining safety, security, and comfort (safety first). And already run according to health protocol guidelines. In connection with the terms and conditions required for each prospective passenger who will carry out air travel (flights) during the Corona Virus Disease 2019 (Covid-19) pandemic alert period, current period: August 25 – August 30, 2021. Domestic flight provisions in that period, to support government policies related to the implementation (implementation) of efforts to prevent, handle and control Covid-19, namely the Enactment of Restrictions on Community Activities (PPKM), category: 1. Level 4, Level 3, Level 2 Java and Bali, 2. Level 4 Sumatra, Kalimantan, Sulawesi, Nusa Tenggara, Maluku and Papua, 3. Level 3, Level 2, Level 1 Sumatra, Kalimantan, Sulawesi, Nusa Tenggara, Maluku and Papua. Key Notes: 1. Please arrive at the airport departure early, which is 3-4 hours before the scheduled flight.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Tanggung Jawab Pengangkut Terhadap Penumpang Yang Tidak Terdaftar Dalam Manifes (Studi Kasus Jatuhnya Pesawat Lion Air Jt
    Abimanyu Faiz Prajogo & H. K. Martono TANGGUNG JAWAB PENGANGKUT TERHADAP PENUMPANG YANG TIDAK TERDAFTAR DALAM MANIFES (STUDI KASUS JATUHNYA PESAWAT LION AIR JT 610 DI KARAWANG) Volume 2 Nomor 2, Desember 2019 E-ISSN : 2655-7347 TANGGUNG JAWAB PENGANGKUT TERHADAP PENUMPANG YANG TIDAK TERDAFTAR DALAM MANIFES (STUDI KASUS JATUHNYA PESAWAT LION AIR JT 610 DI KARAWANG) Abimanyu Faiz Prajogo (Mahasiswa Program S1 Fakultas Hukum Universitas Tarumanagara) [email protected] Prof. Dr. H.K. Martono, S.H., L.L.M. (Corresponding Author) (Dosen Fakultas Hukum Universitas Tarumanagara, Meraih Sarjana Hukum pada Fakultas Hukum Universitas Universitas Indonesia) (E-mail: [email protected]) Abstract Lion Air with fligh code JT-610 route Jakarta to Pangkal Pinang on October 29th, 2028 which crashed in Karawang Waters carrying 178 passengers, one child passenger, 2 babies, and 7 cabin crew. On the plane there are passengers who are not on the ticket or not registered. Issues issued are how the responsibility of the carrier in an aircraft accident that is not listed in the passenger manifest. The research method used in this thesis research is normative legal research. The results of the research prove that passengers who are not in the manifest may receive compensation, but only compensate for voluntary purchases. It may be possible to request ex gratia or voluntarily to buy a passenger ticket that cannot be ordered in the passenger manifest. However, based on information compiled from PT Jasa Raharja, checking the heirs or families of victims of the crash of the Lion Air JT 610 aircraft which were not equipped in the manifest of the aircraft could still receive compensation.
    [Show full text]
  • Administering the Cure
    Vol. 27 No. 2 March 2020 orientaviation.com ADMINISTERING THE CURE Virgin Australia CEO Paul Scurrah following his prescription for airline group’s recovery ATR pitches Nok Air co-founder, Orient Aviation’s Tom Ballantyne SKOL 42-600s Patee Sarasin, launches honored with a lifetime achievement for Asia’s high “tell all” tale of life at award at the inaugural Asia Media country airlines the top of the Thai LCC Awards in Singapore WHY SPEND TENS OF MILLIONS OF DOLLARS ON OVERHAULS WHEN YOU CAN LEASE THE ENGINES YOU NEED, WHEN YOU NEED THEM, FROM THE PIONEER IN INNOVATIVE, CUSTOMER-DRIVEN AVIATION SOLUTIONS? GE90 ENGINES AVAILABLE NOW. Available for short- or long-term lease. [email protected] | +1 561.349.8950 | www.willislease.com CONTENTS Volume 27, Issue 2 COVER STORY 16 ADMINISTERING ORIENT AVIATION MEDIA GROUP THE CURE 17/F Hang Wai Commercial Building, 231-233 Queen’s Road East, Hard-driving Wanchai, Hong Kong Virgin Australia CEO, Editorial (852) 2865 1013 Paul Scurrah, prescribing E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.orientaviation.com bitter medicine to Mailing address: treat the airline’s ills GPO Box 11435 Hong Kong Publisher & Editor-in-Chief Christine McGee E-mail: [email protected] Associate Editor & Chief Correspondent Tom Ballantyne Tel: (612) 9638 6895 COMMENT MAIN STORY Fax: (612) 9684 2776 5 V-shaped or pear-shaped economy ahead? 8 Dealing with the damage of the demon virus E-mail: [email protected] North Asia Correspondent ADDENDUM Geoffrey Tudor 6 Boeing blues add gloss to Airbus annual
    [Show full text]
  • Laws and Regulations: Air Transportation of Persons with Disabilities (PWD) and Others in Indonesia
    International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Invention ISSN (Online): 2319 – 7722, ISSN (Print): 2319 – 7714 www.ijhssi.org ||Volume 6 Issue 11||November. 2017 || PP.50-63 Laws and Regulations: Air Transportation of Persons with Disabilities (PWD) and Others in Indonesia Christine K,1 Frans Kurniawan,2 and Martono3 Abstract: This article purported to explore laws and regulations on air transportation of persons with disabilities (PWD) and others in Indonesia. It consist of three chapter namely chapter one regarding legal ground such as the United Nations (UN), Act No. 13 Year 1998, Act No. 39 Year 1999, high light of Act No. 39 Year 1999, PWD related to Chicago Convention of 1944, PWD in the ICAO Doc.9984, legal ground of PWD in the Civil Aviation Act of 2009; chapter two regarding air transportation of PWD and others provides Citilink’s COC includes the use of electronic ticket, cancellation and refund of E-ticket, legal liability, carrying PWD; Garuda Indonesia’s COC includes the right to refuse carriage, special assistance, passenger with illnesses and PWD, travel with a companion, special assistance for prisoners; Indonesian AirAsia’s COC includes PWD, passenger with a companion, passengers with a medical condition /illnesses, unaccompanied child, pregnant women, infants 8 days and/or below, the right to refuse and others; Lion Air’s COC includes PWD, the right to refuse; Sriwijaya Air’s COC includes the right to deny carriage and other; chapter three conclusion and recommendation. Keywords: persons with disabilities. air transportation, condition of carriage ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------- Date of Submission: 18-11-2017 Date of acceptance: 30-11-2017 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I.
    [Show full text]
  • Demand in Indonesian Domestic Air Travel Market After Deregulation
    Advances in Engineering Research (AER), volume 147 Conference on Global Research on Sustainable Transport (GROST 2017) DEMAND IN INDONESIAN DOMESTIC AIR TRAVEL MARKET AFTER DEREGULATION Basri Fahriza1,2, Frank Willey1 1. RMIT University, 2. STMT Trisakti. corresponding author: [email protected] Abstract: This research is exploring the change of domestic air travel market demand in Indonesia prior and post deregulation. Changes on policies in Indonesian aviation were contributed to the present day market. This historical overview will examine the ‘oligopoly policy’ with only five airlines and the deregulation process that began in 1999. The research then analyses the demand for domestic air travel. Exponential Moving Average Growth were using to analysing data to forecasting the number of passenger from year 2007 to 2015 in yearly basis. Demand is then analysed on three separate airline routes in Indonesia they are Jakarta-Medan, Jakarta-Surabaya, and Jakarta-Pontianak. Keywords: Demand, Domestic Air Travel, Deregulation, Passeneger, Indonesia. Introduction Deregulation in Indonesia start when governments remove restrictions on airlines business Indonesia to encourage the efficient, competitive and consumer oriented marketplace in Indonesian airline industry (Williams, 1993). Secretary General of the Ministry of Communications Anwar Suprijadi said the decision to deregulate was taken in a bid to promote fair competition in domestic airline services, (“Govt insists on licensing more airlines,” 1999). And resulting numbers of new Indonesian airlines emerged predominantly mostly in the cut-fare sector including Lion Air; Indonesia’s Air Asia, former Adam Air, former Batavia Air and Sriwijaya Air, radically changing the nature of the airline business in Indonesia with present of low cost carrier.
    [Show full text]
  • Vol-5, Issue 2
    International Journal of Management Sciences and Business Research, Feb-2016 ISSN (2226-8235) Vol-5, Issue 2 Analysis on the Factors Causing Airlines Bankruptcy: Cases in Indonesia Author’s Details: (1)Suharto Abdul Majid-Faculty of Economic and Business, Padjadjaran University, Bandung, Indonesia (2) Sucherly - Faculty of Economic and Business, Padjadjaran University, Bandung, Indonesia (3) Umi Kaltum- Faculty of Economic and Business, Padjadjaran University, Bandung, Indonesia Abstract the high growth of national aviation services after the aviation deregulation in 2000 has given a positive impact on the increase of national economic activities, especially in tour and trade. In the same time, however, it negatively impacts the aviation business itself, making many airline companies stop their operation and then go to bankruptcy. The aim of this research is to analyze the factors causing bankruptcy to some national airline companies in Indonesia after the aviation deregulation in the periods of 2001-2010 and 2011-2015. It is an exploratory research with a qualitative descriptive approach emphasizing on evaluating the factors causing bankruptcy to a number of domestic airlines in Indonesia. The method of data collection is an interview with the format of focus group discussion (FGD), while the data analysis uses factor analysis method. The results of this research show that there are two main factors that cause bankruptcy to a number of domestic airlines in Indonesia. They are both internal and external factors of the companies. Key words: Airline companies bankruptcy, internal factors, and external factors. INTRODUCTION Since the implementation of the national aviation deregulation policy in 2000, the growth of aviation business in Indonesia increases rapidly.
    [Show full text]
  • Remote ID NPRM Maps out UAS Airspace Integration Plans by Charles Alcock
    PUBLICATIONS Vol.49 | No.2 $9.00 FEBRUARY 2020 | ainonline.com « Joby Aviation’s S4 eVTOL aircraft took a leap forward in the race to launch commercial service with a January 15 announcement of $590 million in new investment from a group led by Japanese car maker Toyota. Joby says it will have the piloted S4 flying as part of the Uber Air air taxi network in early adopter cities before the end of 2023, but it will surely take far longer to get clearance for autonomous eVTOL operations. (Full story on page 8) People HAI’s new president takes the reins page 14 Safety 2019 was a bad year for Part 91 page 12 Part 135 FAA has stern words for BlackBird page 22 Remote ID NPRM maps out UAS airspace integration plans by Charles Alcock Stakeholders have until March 2 to com- in planned urban air mobility applications. Read Our SPECIAL REPORT ment on proposed rules intended to provide The final rule resulting from NPRM FAA- a framework for integrating unmanned air- 2019-100 is expected to require remote craft systems (UAS) into the U.S. National identification for the majority of UAS, with Airspace System. On New Year’s Eve, the exceptions to be made for some amateur- EFB Hardware Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) pub- built UAS, aircraft operated by the U.S. gov- When it comes to electronic flight lished its long-awaited notice of proposed ernment, and UAS weighing less than 0.55 bags, (EFBs), most attention focuses on rulemaking (NPRM) for remote identifica- pounds.
    [Show full text]
  • Lion Air Signs GDS Agreement with Sabre to Fuel Its Growth Strategy
    Lion Air signs GDS agreement with Sabre to fuel its growth strategy April 30, 2018 Sabre adds highly-valued content from leading low-cost carrier in Asia to its global marketplace SINGAPORE, April 30, 2018 /PRNewswire/ -- Sabre Corporation (NASDAQ: SABR), the leading technology provider to the global travel industry, today announced a new content distribution agreement with Lion Air, the largest privately-owned airline in Indonesia, and its subsidiary, Wings Air, as the preferred global distribution system (GDS) to offer Lion Air content in the carrier's home market. Sabre has served as a strategic partner to Lion Air and supported both the airline's reservations and planning and scheduling capabilities through its innovative SabreSonic passenger services system and AirVision portfolio of solutions since the carrier first began operations 18 years ago. Now the airline strives to achieve even more ambitious growth, including a plan to quintuple the size of its fleet with the world's largest number of aircraft on order. As Indonesia remains a rapidly growing travel market, Lion Air is expanding operations and its relationship with Sabre, selecting them as their primary GDS to distribute content across its innovative global travel marketplace. "With our content now available to 425,000 travel agents across the globe, the extension of our agreement with Sabre will be instrumental to our continued success and will provide us with the visibility needed to support our growth objectives throughout Asia Pacific and beyond," said Rudy Lumingkewas, CEO, Lion Air. "As the leading GDS in Indonesia, we are in a unique position to best support Lion Air's growth through the distribution of new bookable content on the Sabre platform," said Rakesh Narayanan, vice president, air line of business, Sabre Travel Network Asia Pacific.
    [Show full text]