Involvement of Taste Receptors in the Effectiveness of Sublingual Immunotherapy
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 9,347,934 B2 Shekdar Et Al
USOO9347934B2 (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 9,347,934 B2 Shekdar et al. (45) Date of Patent: May 24, 2016 (54) ASSAYS FOR IDENTIFYING COMPOUNDS 2008, OO38739 A1 2/2008 Li et al. THAT MODULATE BITTERTASTE 2008/0167286 A1* 7/2008 Gopalakrishnan et al. ........................ 514,21016 (71) Applicants: CHROMOCELL CORPORATION, 2010/01298.33 A1* 5/2010 Brune et al. ................. 435/721 North Brunswick, NJ (US); KRAFT FOODS GROUP BRANDS LLC, FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS Northfield, IL (US) CN 1341632 A 3, 2002 CN 101583717 A 11, 2009 (72) Inventors: Kambiz Shekdar, New York, NY (US); CN 101828.111 A 9, 2010 Purvi Manoj Shah, Bridgewater, NJ WO WO-0038536 A2 7, 2000 WO WO-2004O29087 4/2004 (US); Joseph Gunnet, Flemington, NJ WO WO-2006053771 A2 5, 2006 (US); Jane V. Leland, Wilmette, IL WO WO-2007002026 A2 1/2007 (US); Peter H. Brown, Glenview, IL WO WO-2008057470 5, 2008 (US); Louise Slade, Morris Plains, NJ WO WO-2008119.195 A1 10, 2008 (US) WO WO-20081191.96 10, 2008 WO WO-20081191.97 10, 2008 (73) Assignees: Chromocell Corporation, North W WSi. A2 1929 Brunswick, NJ (US); Kraft Foods WO WO-2010O886.33 8, 2010 Group Brands LLC, Northfield, IL WO WO-2010O99983 A1 9, 2010 (US) WO WO-2013022947 2, 2013 (*) Notice: Subject to any disclaimer, the term of this OTHER PUBLICATIONS patent is extended or adjusted under 35 U.S.C. 154(b) by 0 days. Bachmanov et al., Taste Receptor Genes, 2007, 27:389-414.* Behrens et al., Structural Requirements for Bitter Taste Receptor (21) Appl. -
G Protein-Coupled Receptors
S.P.H. Alexander et al. The Concise Guide to PHARMACOLOGY 2015/16: G protein-coupled receptors. British Journal of Pharmacology (2015) 172, 5744–5869 THE CONCISE GUIDE TO PHARMACOLOGY 2015/16: G protein-coupled receptors Stephen PH Alexander1, Anthony P Davenport2, Eamonn Kelly3, Neil Marrion3, John A Peters4, Helen E Benson5, Elena Faccenda5, Adam J Pawson5, Joanna L Sharman5, Christopher Southan5, Jamie A Davies5 and CGTP Collaborators 1School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Nottingham Medical School, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK, 2Clinical Pharmacology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK, 3School of Physiology and Pharmacology, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1TD, UK, 4Neuroscience Division, Medical Education Institute, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, University of Dundee, Dundee, DD1 9SY, UK, 5Centre for Integrative Physiology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH8 9XD, UK Abstract The Concise Guide to PHARMACOLOGY 2015/16 provides concise overviews of the key properties of over 1750 human drug targets with their pharmacology, plus links to an open access knowledgebase of drug targets and their ligands (www.guidetopharmacology.org), which provides more detailed views of target and ligand properties. The full contents can be found at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/ 10.1111/bph.13348/full. G protein-coupled receptors are one of the eight major pharmacological targets into which the Guide is divided, with the others being: ligand-gated ion channels, voltage-gated ion channels, other ion channels, nuclear hormone receptors, catalytic receptors, enzymes and transporters. These are presented with nomenclature guidance and summary information on the best available pharmacological tools, alongside key references and suggestions for further reading. -
G Protein‐Coupled Receptors
S.P.H. Alexander et al. The Concise Guide to PHARMACOLOGY 2019/20: G protein-coupled receptors. British Journal of Pharmacology (2019) 176, S21–S141 THE CONCISE GUIDE TO PHARMACOLOGY 2019/20: G protein-coupled receptors Stephen PH Alexander1 , Arthur Christopoulos2 , Anthony P Davenport3 , Eamonn Kelly4, Alistair Mathie5 , John A Peters6 , Emma L Veale5 ,JaneFArmstrong7 , Elena Faccenda7 ,SimonDHarding7 ,AdamJPawson7 , Joanna L Sharman7 , Christopher Southan7 , Jamie A Davies7 and CGTP Collaborators 1School of Life Sciences, University of Nottingham Medical School, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK 2Monash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Department of Pharmacology, Monash University, Parkville, Victoria 3052, Australia 3Clinical Pharmacology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK 4School of Physiology, Pharmacology and Neuroscience, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1TD, UK 5Medway School of Pharmacy, The Universities of Greenwich and Kent at Medway, Anson Building, Central Avenue, Chatham Maritime, Chatham, Kent, ME4 4TB, UK 6Neuroscience Division, Medical Education Institute, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, University of Dundee, Dundee, DD1 9SY, UK 7Centre for Discovery Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH8 9XD, UK Abstract The Concise Guide to PHARMACOLOGY 2019/20 is the fourth in this series of biennial publications. The Concise Guide provides concise overviews of the key properties of nearly 1800 human drug targets with an emphasis on selective pharmacology (where available), plus links to the open access knowledgebase source of drug targets and their ligands (www.guidetopharmacology.org), which provides more detailed views of target and ligand properties. Although the Concise Guide represents approximately 400 pages, the material presented is substantially reduced compared to information and links presented on the website. -
Methods to Identify Tas2r Modulators Verfahren Zur Identifizierung Von Tas2r Modulatoren Procédé D’Identification De Modulateurs Tas2r
(19) TZZ _¥¥ _T (11) EP 2 137 322 B1 (12) EUROPEAN PATENT SPECIFICATION (45) Date of publication and mention (51) Int Cl.: of the grant of the patent: C12Q 1/68 (2006.01) A23L 2/52 (2006.01) 27.02.2013 Bulletin 2013/09 A23G 4/00 (2006.01) C07C 53/134 (2006.01) (21) Application number: 08714784.9 (86) International application number: PCT/CH2008/000134 (22) Date of filing: 27.03.2008 (87) International publication number: WO 2008/119195 (09.10.2008 Gazette 2008/41) (54) METHODS TO IDENTIFY TAS2R MODULATORS VERFAHREN ZUR IDENTIFIZIERUNG VON TAS2R MODULATOREN PROCÉDÉ D’IDENTIFICATION DE MODULATEURS TAS2R (84) Designated Contracting States: • BEHRENS MAIK ET AL: "Members of RTP and AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR REEP gene families influence functional bitter HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MT NL NO PL PT taste receptor expression" JOURNAL OF RO SE SI SK TR BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY, vol. 281, no. 29, July 2006(2006-07), pages 20650-20659, XP002494217 (30) Priority: 30.03.2007 US 909143 P ISSN: 0021-9258 30.07.2007 US 962549 P • KUHN CHRISTINA ET AL: "Bitter taste receptors for saccharin and acesulfame K" JOURNAL OF (43) Date of publication of application: NEUROSCIENCE, vol. 24, no. 45, 10 November 30.12.2009 Bulletin 2009/53 2004 (2004-11-10), pages 10260-10265, XP002494218 ISSN: 0270-6474 (73) Proprietor: Givaudan SA • BUFE BERND ET AL: "The human TAS2R16 1214 Vernier (CH) receptor mediates bitter taste in response to beta- glucopyranosides" NATURE GENETICS, (72) Inventors: NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP, NEW YORK, US, • BRUNE, Nicole, Erna, Irene vol. -
Bivariate Genome-Wide Association Analysis Strengthens the Role of Bitter Receptor Clusters on Chromosomes 7 and 12 in Human Bitter Taste
bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/296269; this version posted April 6, 2018. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. Bivariate genome-wide association analysis strengthens the role of bitter receptor clusters on chromosomes 7 and 12 in human bitter taste Liang-Dar Hwang1,2,3,4, Puya Gharahkhani1, Paul A. S. Breslin5,6, Scott D. Gordon1, Gu Zhu1, Nicholas G. Martin1, Danielle R. Reed5, and Margaret J. Wright2,7 1 QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Herston, Queensland 4006, Australia 2 Queensland Brain Institute, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland 4072, Australia 3 Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Herston, Queensland 4006, Australia 4 University of Queensland Diamantina Institute, University of Queensland, Translational Research Institute, Woolloongabba, Queensland 4102, Australia 5 Monell Chemical Senses Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA 6 Department of Nutritional Sciences, School of Environmental and Biological Sciences, Rutgers University, New Brunswick NJ, 08901 USA 7 Centre for Advanced Imaging, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland 4072, Australia Correspondence to be sent to: Liang-Dar Hwang University of Queensland Diamantina Institute Wolloongabba QLD 4102, Australia Email: [email protected] Telephone: +61 7 3443 7976 Fax: +61 7 3443 6966 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/296269; this version posted April 6, 2018. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. -
Prostaglandin E2 As Mediator and Modulator of Airway Smooth Muscle Responses
Institute of Environmental Medicine Division of Physiology The Unit for Experimental Asthma and Allergy Research Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden PROSTAGLANDIN E2 AS MEDIATOR AND MODULATOR OF AIRWAY SMOOTH MUSCLE RESPONSES Jesper Säfholm Stockholm 2013 All published papers were reproduced with permission from the publisher. Published by Karolinska Institutet. Printed by Repro Print AB © Jesper Säfholm, 2013 ISBN 978-91-7549-167-7 Printed by 2013 Gårdsvägen 4, 169 70 Solna To boldly go where a lot of people have gone before ABSTRACT Prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) is a lipid mediator produced by virtually every cell of the human body. Because common non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) inhibit its biosynthesis, PGE2 is usually considered to be a ‘pro-inflammatory’ mediator. The role of PGE2 in the lung and airways has however always been unclear. In particular, the airway responses caused by activation of its four different EP receptors have been debated. Research on the mechanisms involved in the actions of PGE2 has previously been limited by the low potency and selectivity of available pharmacological tools. Recently, a number of potent receptor antagonists and enzyme inhibitors have become available. The aim of this thesis was therefore to characterise airway responses to PGE2 in greater detail, focusing on the role of its receptors on baseline smooth muscle function and during antigen-induced contractions. Alongside investigating PGE2 responses, the newly discovered relaxant effects of bitter tasting substances acting at their respective receptors (TAS2Rs) were examined. The project mainly involved analysis of isometric contractions and relaxations in isolated airways from guinea pigs and humans in organ baths. -
Alissa L. Allen1, John E. Mcgeary2, and John E. Hayes1
Bitterness of the non-nutritive sweetener Acesulfame Potassium varies with polymorphisms in TAS2R9, TAS2R31 and TAS2R38. Alissa L. Allen1, John E. McGeary2, and John E. Hayes1 1 Department of Food Science, College of Agricultural Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA. 2 Providence Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Providence, RI Background Results Finding 4: Aggregate Genetic Bitterness Score predicts • Sweetness is innately liked by humans (reviewed by (Steiner, Glaser et al. Finding 1: Variation in the TAS2R9 Val187Ala allele the bitterness of AceK 2001)), even prior to birth (Snoo 1937). Many highly liked foods contain high predicts AceK bitterness endogenous amounts of natural sugars, or have sugars or other sweeteners added during processing. However, due to health risks such as cardiovascular disease, diabetes and obesity (Hill and Prentice 1995; Howard and Wylie- Rosett 2002), there has been a demand for reduced added-sugar in foods. To retain desired levels of sweetness while reducing calories, bulk carbohydrates are often replaced with non-nutritive sweeteners. • Acesulfame potassium (AceK) was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for use in dry foods in 1994; approval as a general-purpose sweetener followed in 2002. However, in addition to eliciting sweet sensations, many non-nutritive sweeteners also have objectionable side tastes, such as bitterness, that are experienced by some individuals but not others. Thus, better understanding of the mechanisms underlying this variability may facilitate improved product formulation, with the potential to substantially impact health and wellness. Figure 4: Correlation between Perceived Bitterness of AceK and the Aggregate • Numerous studies have demonstrated that the perception of bitter taste in Figure 1: Effect of TAS2R9 polymorphisms on the bitterness and sweetness of AceK and bitterness of PROP. -
The Potential Druggability of Chemosensory G Protein-Coupled Receptors
International Journal of Molecular Sciences Review Beyond the Flavour: The Potential Druggability of Chemosensory G Protein-Coupled Receptors Antonella Di Pizio * , Maik Behrens and Dietmar Krautwurst Leibniz-Institute for Food Systems Biology at the Technical University of Munich, Freising, 85354, Germany; [email protected] (M.B.); [email protected] (D.K.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +49-8161-71-2904; Fax: +49-8161-71-2970 Received: 13 February 2019; Accepted: 12 March 2019; Published: 20 March 2019 Abstract: G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) belong to the largest class of drug targets. Approximately half of the members of the human GPCR superfamily are chemosensory receptors, including odorant receptors (ORs), trace amine-associated receptors (TAARs), bitter taste receptors (TAS2Rs), sweet and umami taste receptors (TAS1Rs). Interestingly, these chemosensory GPCRs (csGPCRs) are expressed in several tissues of the body where they are supposed to play a role in biological functions other than chemosensation. Despite their abundance and physiological/pathological relevance, the druggability of csGPCRs has been suggested but not fully characterized. Here, we aim to explore the potential of targeting csGPCRs to treat diseases by reviewing the current knowledge of csGPCRs expressed throughout the body and by analysing the chemical space and the drug-likeness of flavour molecules. Keywords: smell; taste; flavour molecules; drugs; chemosensory receptors; ecnomotopic expression 1. Introduction Thirty-five percent of approved drugs act by modulating G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) [1,2]. GPCRs, also named 7-transmembrane (7TM) receptors, based on their canonical structure, are the largest family of membrane receptors in the human genome. -
The Bitter Taste Receptor Tas2r14 Is Expressed in Ovarian Cancer and Mediates Apoptotic Signalling
THE BITTER TASTE RECEPTOR TAS2R14 IS EXPRESSED IN OVARIAN CANCER AND MEDIATES APOPTOTIC SIGNALLING by Louis T. P. Martin Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science at Dalhousie University Halifax, Nova Scotia June 2017 © Copyright by Louis T. P. Martin, 2017 DEDICATION PAGE To my grandparents, Christina, Frank, Brenda and Bernie, and my parents, Angela and Tom – for teaching me the value of hard work. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES ............................................................................................................. vi LIST OF FIGURES .......................................................................................................... vii ABSTRACT ....................................................................................................................... ix LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AND SYMBOLS USED .................................................... x ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .............................................................................................. xii CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................ 1 1.1 G-PROTEIN COUPLED RECEPTORS ................................................................ 1 1.2 GPCR CLASSES .................................................................................................... 4 1.3 GPCR SIGNALING THROUGH G PROTEINS ................................................... 6 1.4 BITTER TASTE RECEPTORS (TAS2RS) ........................................................... -
Involvement of TGF-ß Receptor– and Integrin-Mediated Signaling Pathways in the Pathogenesis of Granular Corneal Dystrophy II
Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Involvement of TGF- Receptor– and Integrin-Mediated Signaling Pathways in the Pathogenesis of Granular Corneal Dystrophy II Seung-il Choi,1 Yeong-Min Yoo,2 Bong-Yoon Kim,1 Tae-im Kim,1 Hyun-ju Cho,1 So-yoen Ahn,1 Hyung Keun Lee,1 Hyun-Soo Cho,3 and Eung Kweon Kim1 PURPOSE. The purpose of this study was to elucidate the (Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010;51:1832–1847) DOI: pathophysiological process in primary cultured corneal fibro- 10.1167/iovs.09-4149 blasts (PCFs) from normal subjects and granular corneal dys- trophy (GCD) II patients, by using cDNA microarrays. ranular corneal dystrophy II (GCD II) is a disorder char- METHODS. PCFs were isolated from the corneas of normal Gacterized by age-dependent progressive accumulation of subjects and GCD II patients who were heterozygous and protein deposits in the corneal epithelia and stroma, followed homozygous for the TGFBI R124H mutation. RNA was isolated by disruption of corneal transparency. GCD II is an autosomal from each sample, and gene expression profiles were analyzed dominant disorder caused by a point mutation (R124H) in the with a cDNA microarray consisting of approximately 29,000 transforming growth factor--induced gene (TGFBI) on chro- genes. Cell adhesion assays were performed to confirm the mosome 5, region q31.1,2 TGFBI encodes a highly conserved functionality of the detected gene expression profiles. 683 amino acid protein (TGFBIp) that contains a secretary signal sequence and an Arg-Gly-Asp (RGD) motif that serves as RESULTS. Twofold differences were detected in the expression a ligand recognition site for integrins.1 TGFBIp is a component of 555 genes between wild-type and homozygous GCD II PCFs. -
Bitter Taste Receptors for Saccharin and Acesulfame K
10260 • The Journal of Neuroscience, November 10, 2004 • 24(45):10260–10265 Cellular/Molecular Bitter Taste Receptors for Saccharin and Acesulfame K Christina Kuhn,1 Bernd Bufe,1 Marcel Winnig,1 Thomas Hofmann,2 Oliver Frank,2 Maik Behrens,1 Tatjana Lewtschenko,2 Jay P. Slack,3 Cynthia D. Ward,3 and Wolfgang Meyerhof1 1German Institute of Human Nutrition Potsdam-Rehbruecke, Department of Molecular Genetics, 14558 Nuthetal, Germany, 2Institute of Food Chemistry, University of Mu¨nster, 48149 Mu¨nster, Germany, and 3Givaudan Flavors Corporation, Cincinnati, Ohio 45216 Weight-conscious subjects and diabetics use the sulfonyl amide sweeteners saccharin and acesulfame K to reduce their calorie and sugar intake. However, the intrinsic bitter aftertaste, which is caused by unknown mechanisms, limits the use of these sweeteners. Here, we show by functional expression experiments in human embryonic kidney cells that saccharin and acesulfame K activate two members of the human TAS2R family (hTAS2R43 and hTAS2R44) at concentrations known to stimulate bitter taste. These receptors are expressed in tongue taste papillae. Moreover, the sweet inhibitor lactisole did not block the responses of cells transfected with TAS2R43 and TAS2R44, whereas it did block the response of cells expressing the sweet taste receptor heteromer hTAS1R2–hTAS1R3. The two receptors were also activated by nanomolar concentrations of aristolochic acid, a purely bitter-tasting compound. Thus, hTAS2R43 and hTAS2R44 function as cognate bitter taste receptors and do not contribute to the sweet taste of saccharin and acesulfame K. Consistent with the in vitro data, cross-adaptation studies in human subjects also support the existence of common receptors for both sulfonyl amide sweeteners. -
Lupus Nephritis Supp Table 5
Supplementary Table 5 : Transcripts and DAVID pathways correlating with the expression of CD4 in lupus kidney biopsies Positive correlation Negative correlation Transcripts Pathways Transcripts Pathways Identifier Gene Symbol Correlation coefficient with CD4 Annotation Cluster 1 Enrichment Score: 26.47 Count P_Value Benjamini Identifier Gene Symbol Correlation coefficient with CD4 Annotation Cluster 1 Enrichment Score: 3.16 Count P_Value Benjamini ILMN_1727284 CD4 1 GOTERM_BP_FAT translational elongation 74 2.50E-42 1.00E-38 ILMN_1681389 C2H2 zinc finger protein-0.40001984 INTERPRO Ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme/RWD-like 17 2.00E-05 4.20E-02 ILMN_1772218 HLA-DPA1 0.934229063 SP_PIR_KEYWORDS ribosome 60 2.00E-41 4.60E-39 ILMN_1768954 RIBC1 -0.400186083 SMART UBCc 14 1.00E-04 3.50E-02 ILMN_1778977 TYROBP 0.933302249 KEGG_PATHWAY Ribosome 65 3.80E-35 6.60E-33 ILMN_1699190 SORCS1 -0.400223681 SP_PIR_KEYWORDS ubl conjugation pathway 81 1.30E-04 2.30E-02 ILMN_1689655 HLA-DRA 0.915891173 SP_PIR_KEYWORDS protein biosynthesis 91 4.10E-34 7.20E-32 ILMN_3249088 LOC93432 -0.400285215 GOTERM_MF_FAT small conjugating protein ligase activity 35 1.40E-04 4.40E-02 ILMN_3228688 HLA-DRB1 0.906190291 SP_PIR_KEYWORDS ribonucleoprotein 114 4.80E-34 6.70E-32 ILMN_1680436 CSH2 -0.400299744 SP_PIR_KEYWORDS ligase 54 1.50E-04 2.00E-02 ILMN_2157441 HLA-DRA 0.902996561 GOTERM_CC_FAT cytosolic ribosome 59 3.20E-33 2.30E-30 ILMN_1722755 KRTAP6-2 -0.400334007 GOTERM_MF_FAT acid-amino acid ligase activity 40 1.60E-04 4.00E-02 ILMN_2066066 HLA-DRB6 0.901531942 SP_PIR_KEYWORDS