DOCSLIB.ORG

G Protein‐Coupled Receptors

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

S.P.H. Alexander et al. The Concise Guide to PHARMACOLOGY 2019/20: G protein-coupled receptors. British Journal of Pharmacology (2019) 176, S21–S141 THE CONCISE GUIDE TO PHARMACOLOGY 2019/20: G protein-coupled receptors Stephen PH Alexander1 , Arthur Christopoulos2 , Anthony P Davenport3 , Eamonn Kelly4, Alistair Mathie5 , John A Peters6 , Emma L Veale5 ,JaneFArmstrong7 , Elena Faccenda7 ,SimonDHarding7 ,AdamJPawson7 , Joanna L Sharman7 , Christopher Southan7 , Jamie A Davies7 and CGTP Collaborators 1School of Life Sciences, University of Nottingham Medical School, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK 2Monash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Department of Pharmacology, Monash University, Parkville, Victoria 3052, Australia 3Clinical Pharmacology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK 4School of Physiology, Pharmacology and Neuroscience, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1TD, UK 5Medway School of Pharmacy, The Universities of Greenwich and Kent at Medway, Anson Building, Central Avenue, Chatham Maritime, Chatham, Kent, ME4 4TB, UK 6Neuroscience Division, Medical Education Institute, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, University of Dundee, Dundee, DD1 9SY, UK 7Centre for Discovery Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH8 9XD, UK Abstract The Concise Guide to PHARMACOLOGY 2019/20 is the fourth in this series of biennial publications. The Concise Guide provides concise overviews of the key properties of nearly 1800 human drug targets with an emphasis on selective pharmacology (where available), plus links to the open access knowledgebase source of drug targets and their ligands (www.guidetopharmacology.org), which provides more detailed views of target and ligand properties. Although the Concise Guide represents approximately 400 pages, the material presented is substantially reduced compared to information and links presented on the website. It provides a permanent, citable, point-in-time record that will survive database updates. The full contents of this section can be found at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bph.14748. G protein-coupled receptors are one of the six major pharmacological targets into which the Guide is divided, with the others being: ion chan- nels, nuclear hormone receptors, catalytic receptors, enzymes and transporters. These are presented with nomenclature guidance and summary information on the best available pharmacological tools, alongside key references and suggestions for further reading. The landscape format of the Concise Guide is designed to facilitate comparison of related targets from material contemporary to mid-2019, and supersedes data presented in the 2017/18, 2015/16 and 2013/14 Concise Guides and previous Guides to Receptors and Channels. It is produced in close conjunction with the International Union of Basic and Clinical Pharmacology Committee on Receptor Nomenclature and Drug Classification (NC-IUPHAR), therefore, providing official IUPHAR classification and nomenclature for human drug targets, where appropriate. Conflict of interest The authors state that there are no conflicts of interest to disclose. © 2019 The Authors. British Journal of Pharmacology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of The British Pharmacological Society. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Overview: G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are the largest class of membrane proteins in the human genome. The term "7TM receptor" is commonly used interchangeably with "GPCR", although there are some receptors with seven transmembrane domains that do not signal through G proteins. GPCRs share a common architecture, each consisting of a single polypeptide with an extracellular N-terminus, an intracellular C-terminus and seven hydrophobic transmembrane domains (TM1-TM7) linked by three extracellular loops (ECL1-ECL3) and three intracellular loops (ICL1-ICL3). About 800 GPCRs have been identified in man, of which about half have sensory functions, mediating olfaction (˜400), taste (33), light perception (10) and pheromone signalling (5) [1479]. The remaining 350 non-sensory GPCRs mediate signalling by ligands that range in size from small molecules to peptides to large proteins; they are the targets for the majority of drugs in clinical usage [1642, 1772], although only a minority of these receptors are exploited therapeutically. The first classification scheme to be proposed for GPCRs [1129] divided them, on the basic of sequence homology, into six classes. These Searchable database: http://www.guidetopharmacology.org/index.jsp G protein-coupled receptors S21 Full Contents of ConciseGuide: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bph.14748/full S.P.H. Alexander et al. The Concise Guide to PHARMACOLOGY 2019/20: G protein-coupled receptors. British Journal of Pharmacology (2019) 176, S21–S141 classes and their prototype members were as follows: Class A (rhodopsin-like), Class B (secretin receptor family), Class C (metabotropic glutamate), Class D (fungal mating pheromone receptors), Class E (cyclic AMP receptors) and Class F (frizzled/smoothened). Of these, classes D and E are not found in vertebrates. An alternative classification scheme "GRAFS" [1890] divides vertebrate GPCRs into five classes, overlapping with the A-F nomenclature, viz: Glutamate family (class C), which includes metabotropic glutamate receptors, a calcium-sensing receptor and GABAB receptors, as well as three taste type 1 receptors and a family of pheromone receptors (V2 receptors) that are abundant in rodents but absent in man [1479]. Rhodopsin family (class A), which includes receptors for a wide variety of small molecules, neurotransmitters, peptides and hormones, together with olfactory receptors, visual pigments, taste type 2 receptors and five pheromone receptors (V1 receptors). Adhesion family GPCRs are phylogenetically related to class B receptors, from which they differ by possessing large extracellular N-termini that are autoproteolytically cleaved from their 7TM domains at a conserved "GPCR proteolysis site" (GPS) which lies within a much larger (320 residue) "GPCR autoproteolysis-inducing" (GAIN) domain, an evolutionary ancient mofif also found in polycystic kidney disease 1 (PKD1)-like proteins, which has been suggested to be both required and sufficient for autoproteolysis [1743]. Frizzled family consists of 10 Frizzled proteins (FZD(1-10)) and Smoothened (SMO). The FZDs are activated by secreted lipoglycoproteins of the WNT family, whereas SMO is indirectly activated by the Hedgehog (HH) family of proteins acting on the transmembrane protein Patched (PTCH). Secretin family, encoded by 15 genes in humans. The ligands for receptors in this family are polypeptide hormones of 27-141 amino acid residues; nine of the mammalian receptors respond to ligands that are structurally related to one another (glucagon, glucagon-like peptides (GLP-1, GLP-2), glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP), secretin, vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP), pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide (PACAP) and growth-hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH)) [811]. GPCR families Family Class A Class B (Secretin) Class C (Glutamate) Adhesion Frizzled Receptors with known ligands 197 15 12 0 11 Orphans 87 (54)a - 8 (1)a 26 (6)a 0 Sensory (olfaction) 390b,c -- -- Sensory (vision) 10d opsins - - - - Sensory (taste) 30c taste 2 - 3c taste 1 - - Sensory (pheromone) 5c vomeronasal 1 - - - - Total 719 15 22 33 11 aNumbers in brackets refer to orphan receptors for which an endogenous ligand has been proposed in at least one publication, see [455]; b[1634]; c[1479]; d[2109]. β Much of our current understanding of the structure and function of GPCRs is the result of pioneering work on the visual pigment rhodopsin and on the 2 adrenoceptor, the latter culminating in the award of the 2012 Nobel Prize in chemistry to Robert Lefkowitz and Brian Kobilka [1121, 1244]. Pseudogenes Below is a curated list of pseudogenes that in humans are non-coding for receptor protein. In some cases these have a shared ancestry with genes that encode functional receptors in rats and mice. ADGRE4P, GNRHR2, GPR79, HTR5BP, NPY6R, TAAR3P, TAAR4P, TAAR7P, TAS2R12P, TAS2R15P, TAS2R18P, TAS2R2P, TAS2R62P, TAS2R63P, TAS2R64P, TAS2R67P, TAS2R68P, TAS2R6P. A more detailed listing containg further information can be viewed here. Olfactory receptors Olfactory receptors are also seven-transmembrane spanning G protein-coupled receptors, responsible for the detection of odorants. These are not currently included as they are not yet associated with extensive pharmacological data but are curated in the following databases: The gene list of olfactory receptors at HGNC, and curated by HORDE and ORDB. Searchable database: http://www.guidetopharmacology.org/index.jsp G protein-coupled receptors S22 Full Contents of ConciseGuide: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bph.14748/full S.P.H. Alexander et al. The Concise Guide to PHARMACOLOGY 2019/20: G protein-coupled receptors. British Journal of Pharmacology (2019) 176, S21–S141 Further reading on G protein-coupled receptors Kenakin T. (2018) Is the Quest for Signaling Bias Worth the Effort? Mol. Pharmacol. 93: 266-269 Roth BL et al. (2017) Discovery of new GPCR ligands to illuminate new biology. Nat. Chem. Biol. 13: [PMID:29348268] 1143-1151 [PMID:29045379] Michel MC et al. (2018) Biased Agonism in Drug Discovery-Is It Too Soon to Choose a Path? Mol.
Recommended publications
  • Mglu2 Receptor Agonism, but Not Positive Allosteric Modulation, Elicits Rapid Tolerance Towards Their Primary Efficacy on Sleep Measures in Rats

    Mglu2 Receptor Agonism, but Not Positive Allosteric Modulation, Elicits Rapid Tolerance Towards Their Primary Efficacy on Sleep Measures in Rats

    RESEARCH ARTICLE mGlu2 Receptor Agonism, but Not Positive Allosteric Modulation, Elicits Rapid Tolerance towards Their Primary Efficacy on Sleep Measures in Rats Abdallah Ahnaou1*, Hilde Lavreysen1, Gary Tresadern2, Jose M. Cid2, Wilhelmus H. Drinkenburg1 1 Dept. of Neuroscience, Janssen Research & Development, A Division of Janssen Pharmaceutica N.V., Turnhoutseweg 30, B-2340, Beerse, Belgium, 2 Neuroscience Medicinal Chemistry, Janssen Research & Development, Janssen-Cilag S.A., Jarama 75, Polígono Industrial, 45007, Toledo, Spain * [email protected] Abstract OPEN ACCESS G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) agonists are known to induce both cellular adaptations Citation: Ahnaou A, Lavreysen H, Tresadern G, Cid resulting in tolerance to therapeutic effects and withdrawal symptoms upon treatment dis- JM, Drinkenburg WH (2015) mGlu2 Receptor continuation. Glutamate neurotransmission is an integral part of sleep-wake mechanisms, Agonism, but Not Positive Allosteric Modulation, Elicits Rapid Tolerance towards Their Primary which processes have translational relevance for central activity and target engagement. Efficacy on Sleep Measures in Rats. PLoS ONE 10 Here, we investigated the efficacy and tolerance potential of the metabotropic glutamate (12): e0144017. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0144017 receptors (mGluR2/3) agonist LY354740 versus mGluR2 positive allosteric modulator Editor: James Porter, University of North Dakota, (PAM) JNJ-42153605 on sleep-wake organisation in rats. In vitro, the selectivity and UNITED STATES potency of JNJ-42153605 were characterized. In vivo, effects on sleep measures were Received: July 12, 2015 investigated in rats after once daily oral repeated treatment for 7 days, withdrawal and con- Accepted: November 12, 2015 secutive re-administration of LY354740 (1–10 mg/kg) and JNJ-42153605 (3–30 mg/kg).
  • Characterisation of the Α1b-Adrenoceptor by Modeling, Dynamics and Virtual Screening Kapil Jain B.Pharm, M.S.(Pharm.)

    Characterisation of the Α1b-Adrenoceptor by Modeling, Dynamics and Virtual Screening Kapil Jain B.Pharm, M.S.(Pharm.)

    Characterisation of the α1B-Adrenoceptor by Modeling, Dynamics and Virtual Screening Kapil Jain B.Pharm, M.S.(Pharm.) A Thesis submitted for the degree of Master of Philosophy at The University of Queensland in 2018 Institute for Molecular Bioscience 0 Abstract G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are the largest druggable class of proteins yet relatively little is known about the mechanism by which agonist binding induces the conformational changes necessary for G protein activation and intracellular signaling. Recently, the Kobilka group has shown that agonists, neutral antagonists and inverse agonists stabilise distinct extracellular surface (ECS) conformations of the β2-adrenergic receptor (AR) opening up new possibilities for allosteric drug targeting at GPCRs. The goal of this project is to extend these studies to define how the ECS conformation of the α1B-AR changes during agonist binding and develop an understanding of ligand entry and exit mechanisms that may help in the design of specific ligands with higher selectivity, efficacy and longer duration of action. Two parallel approaches were initiated to identify likely functional residues. The role of residues lining the primary binding site were predicted by online web server (Q-Site Finder) while secondary binding sites residues were predicted from molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. Predicted functionally significant residues were mutated and their function was established using FLIPR, radioligand and saturation binding assays. Despite the α1B-AR being pursued as a drug target for over last few decades, few specific agonists and antagonists are known to date. In an attempt to address this gap, we pursued ligand-based approach to find potential new leads.
  • (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 9,498,481 B2 Rao Et Al

    (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 9,498,481 B2 Rao Et Al

    USOO9498481 B2 (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 9,498,481 B2 Rao et al. (45) Date of Patent: *Nov. 22, 2016 (54) CYCLOPROPYL MODULATORS OF P2Y12 WO WO95/26325 10, 1995 RECEPTOR WO WO99/O5142 2, 1999 WO WOOO/34283 6, 2000 WO WO O1/92262 12/2001 (71) Applicant: Apharaceuticals. Inc., La WO WO O1/922.63 12/2001 olla, CA (US) WO WO 2011/O17108 2, 2011 (72) Inventors: Tadimeti Rao, San Diego, CA (US); Chengzhi Zhang, San Diego, CA (US) OTHER PUBLICATIONS Drugs of the Future 32(10), 845-853 (2007).* (73) Assignee: Auspex Pharmaceuticals, Inc., LaJolla, Tantry et al. in Expert Opin. Invest. Drugs (2007) 16(2):225-229.* CA (US) Wallentin et al. in the New England Journal of Medicine, 361 (11), 1045-1057 (2009).* (*) Notice: Subject to any disclaimer, the term of this Husted et al. in The European Heart Journal 27, 1038-1047 (2006).* patent is extended or adjusted under 35 Auspex in www.businesswire.com/news/home/20081023005201/ U.S.C. 154(b) by Od en/Auspex-Pharmaceuticals-Announces-Positive-Results-Clinical M YW- (b) by ayS. Study (published: Oct. 23, 2008).* This patent is Subject to a terminal dis- Concert In www.concertpharma. com/news/ claimer ConcertPresentsPreclinicalResultsNAMS.htm (published: Sep. 25. 2008).* Concert2 in Expert Rev. Anti Infect. Ther. 6(6), 782 (2008).* (21) Appl. No.: 14/977,056 Springthorpe et al. in Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters 17. 6013-6018 (2007).* (22) Filed: Dec. 21, 2015 Leis et al. in Current Organic Chemistry 2, 131-144 (1998).* Angiolillo et al., Pharmacology of emerging novel platelet inhibi (65) Prior Publication Data tors, American Heart Journal, 2008, 156(2) Supp.
  • Metabotropic Glutamate Receptors

    Metabotropic Glutamate Receptors

    mGluR Metabotropic glutamate receptors mGluR (metabotropic glutamate receptor) is a type of glutamate receptor that are active through an indirect metabotropic process. They are members of thegroup C family of G-protein-coupled receptors, or GPCRs. Like all glutamate receptors, mGluRs bind with glutamate, an amino acid that functions as an excitatoryneurotransmitter. The mGluRs perform a variety of functions in the central and peripheral nervous systems: mGluRs are involved in learning, memory, anxiety, and the perception of pain. mGluRs are found in pre- and postsynaptic neurons in synapses of the hippocampus, cerebellum, and the cerebral cortex, as well as other parts of the brain and in peripheral tissues. Eight different types of mGluRs, labeled mGluR1 to mGluR8, are divided into groups I, II, and III. Receptor types are grouped based on receptor structure and physiological activity. www.MedChemExpress.com 1 mGluR Agonists, Antagonists, Inhibitors, Modulators & Activators (-)-Camphoric acid (1R,2S)-VU0155041 Cat. No.: HY-122808 Cat. No.: HY-14417A (-)-Camphoric acid is the less active enantiomer (1R,2S)-VU0155041, Cis regioisomer of VU0155041, is of Camphoric acid. Camphoric acid stimulates a partial mGluR4 agonist with an EC50 of 2.35 osteoblast differentiation and induces μM. glutamate receptor expression. Camphoric acid also significantly induced the activation of NF-κB and AP-1. Purity: ≥98.0% Purity: ≥98.0% Clinical Data: No Development Reported Clinical Data: No Development Reported Size: 10 mM × 1 mL, 100 mg Size: 10 mM × 1 mL, 5 mg, 10 mg, 25 mg (2R,4R)-APDC (R)-ADX-47273 Cat. No.: HY-102091 Cat. No.: HY-13058B (2R,4R)-APDC is a selective group II metabotropic (R)-ADX-47273 is a potent mGluR5 positive glutamate receptors (mGluRs) agonist.
  • Molecular Dissection of G-Protein Coupled Receptor Signaling and Oligomerization

    Molecular Dissection of G-Protein Coupled Receptor Signaling and Oligomerization

    MOLECULAR DISSECTION OF G-PROTEIN COUPLED RECEPTOR SIGNALING AND OLIGOMERIZATION BY MICHAEL RIZZO A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY GRADUATE SCHOOL OF ARTS AND SCIENCES in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Biology December, 2019 Winston-Salem, North Carolina Approved By: Erik C. Johnson, Ph.D. Advisor Wayne E. Pratt, Ph.D. Chair Pat C. Lord, Ph.D. Gloria K. Muday, Ph.D. Ke Zhang, Ph.D. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would first like to thank my advisor, Dr. Erik Johnson, for his support, expertise, and leadership during my time in his lab. Without him, the work herein would not be possible. I would also like to thank the members of my committee, Dr. Gloria Muday, Dr. Ke Zhang, Dr. Wayne Pratt, and Dr. Pat Lord, for their guidance and advice that helped improve the quality of the research presented here. I would also like to thank members of the Johnson lab, both past and present, for being valuable colleagues and friends. I would especially like to thank Dr. Jason Braco, Dr. Jon Fisher, Dr. Jake Saunders, and Becky Perry, all of whom spent a great deal of time offering me advice, proofreading grants and manuscripts, and overall supporting me through the ups and downs of the research process. Finally, I would like to thank my family, both for instilling in me a passion for knowledge and education, and for their continued support. In particular, I would like to thank my wife Emerald – I am forever indebted to you for your support throughout this process, and I will never forget the sacrifices you made to help me get to where I am today.
  • A Computational Approach for Defining a Signature of Β-Cell Golgi Stress in Diabetes Mellitus

    A Computational Approach for Defining a Signature of Β-Cell Golgi Stress in Diabetes Mellitus

    Page 1 of 781 Diabetes A Computational Approach for Defining a Signature of β-Cell Golgi Stress in Diabetes Mellitus Robert N. Bone1,6,7, Olufunmilola Oyebamiji2, Sayali Talware2, Sharmila Selvaraj2, Preethi Krishnan3,6, Farooq Syed1,6,7, Huanmei Wu2, Carmella Evans-Molina 1,3,4,5,6,7,8* Departments of 1Pediatrics, 3Medicine, 4Anatomy, Cell Biology & Physiology, 5Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, the 6Center for Diabetes & Metabolic Diseases, and the 7Herman B. Wells Center for Pediatric Research, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202; 2Department of BioHealth Informatics, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN, 46202; 8Roudebush VA Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN 46202. *Corresponding Author(s): Carmella Evans-Molina, MD, PhD ([email protected]) Indiana University School of Medicine, 635 Barnhill Drive, MS 2031A, Indianapolis, IN 46202, Telephone: (317) 274-4145, Fax (317) 274-4107 Running Title: Golgi Stress Response in Diabetes Word Count: 4358 Number of Figures: 6 Keywords: Golgi apparatus stress, Islets, β cell, Type 1 diabetes, Type 2 diabetes 1 Diabetes Publish Ahead of Print, published online August 20, 2020 Diabetes Page 2 of 781 ABSTRACT The Golgi apparatus (GA) is an important site of insulin processing and granule maturation, but whether GA organelle dysfunction and GA stress are present in the diabetic β-cell has not been tested. We utilized an informatics-based approach to develop a transcriptional signature of β-cell GA stress using existing RNA sequencing and microarray datasets generated using human islets from donors with diabetes and islets where type 1(T1D) and type 2 diabetes (T2D) had been modeled ex vivo. To narrow our results to GA-specific genes, we applied a filter set of 1,030 genes accepted as GA associated.
  • The 'C3ar Antagonist' SB290157 Is a Partial C5ar2 Agonist

    The 'C3ar Antagonist' SB290157 Is a Partial C5ar2 Agonist

    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.08.01.232090; this version posted August 3, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. The ‘C3aR antagonist’ SB290157 is a partial C5aR2 agonist Xaria X. Li1, Vinod Kumar1, John D. Lee1, Trent M. Woodruff1* 1School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, 4072 Australia. * Correspondence: Prof. Trent M. Woodruff School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, 4072 Australia. Ph: +61 7 3365 2924; Fax: +61 7 3365 1766; E-mail: [email protected] Keywords: Complement C3a, C3aR, SB290157, C5aR1, C5aR2 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.08.01.232090; this version posted August 3, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. Abbreviations used in this article: BRET, bioluminescence resonance energy transfer; BSA, bovine serum albumin; C3aR, C3a receptor C5aR1, C5a receptor 1; CHO-C3aR, Chinese hamster ovary cells stably expressing C3aR; CHO-C5aR1, Chinese hamster ovary cells stably expressing C5aR1; DMEM, Dulbecco's Modified Eagle's Medium; ERK1/2, extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2; FBS, foetal bovine serum; HEK293, human embryonic kidney 293 cells; HMDM, human monocyte-derived macrophage; i.p., intraperitoneal; i.v., intravenous; rhC5a, recombinant human C5a; RT, room temperature; S.E.M.
  • The Impact of the Nonpeptide Corticotropin-Releasing Hormone Antagonist Antalarmin on Behavioral and Endocrine Responses to Stress*

    The Impact of the Nonpeptide Corticotropin-Releasing Hormone Antagonist Antalarmin on Behavioral and Endocrine Responses to Stress*

    0013-7227/99/$03.00/0 Vol. 140, No. 1 Endocrinology Printed in U.S.A. Copyright © 1999 by The Endocrine Society The Impact of the Nonpeptide Corticotropin-Releasing Hormone Antagonist Antalarmin on Behavioral and Endocrine Responses to Stress* TERRENCE DEAK, KIEN T. NGUYEN, ANDREA L. EHRLICH, LINDA R. WATKINS, ROBERT L. SPENCER, STEVEN F. MAIER, JULIO LICINIO, MA-LI WONG, GEORGE P. CHROUSOS, ELIZABETH WEBSTER, AND PHILIP W. GOLD Department of Psychology (T.D., K.T.N., A.L.E., L.R.W., R.L.S., S.F.M.), University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado 80309-0345; Clinical Neuroendocrinology Branch (J.L., M.-L.W., P.W.G.), National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892-1284; and Developmental Neuroendocrinology Branch (G.P.C., E.W.), National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892-1284 ABSTRACT Furthermore, because rats previously exposed to inescapable shock The nonpeptide CRH antagonist antalarmin has been shown to (IS; 100 shocks, 1.6 mA, 5 sec each), demonstrate enhanced fear block both behavioral and endocrine responses to CRH. However, it’s conditioning, we investigated whether this effect would be blocked by potential activity in blunting behavioral and endocrine sequelae of antalarmin. Antalarmin (20 mg/kgz2 ml ip) impaired both the induc- stressor exposure has not been assessed. Because antagonism of cen- tion and expression of conditioned fear. In addition, antalarmin tral CRH by a-helical CRH attenuates conditioned fear responses, we blocked the enhancement of fear conditioning produced by prior ex- sought to test antalarmin in this regard.
  • Transcriptomic Analysis of Native Versus Cultured Human and Mouse Dorsal Root Ganglia Focused on Pharmacological Targets Short

    Transcriptomic Analysis of Native Versus Cultured Human and Mouse Dorsal Root Ganglia Focused on Pharmacological Targets Short

    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/766865; this version posted September 12, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-ND 4.0 International license. Transcriptomic analysis of native versus cultured human and mouse dorsal root ganglia focused on pharmacological targets Short title: Comparative transcriptomics of acutely dissected versus cultured DRGs Andi Wangzhou1, Lisa A. McIlvried2, Candler Paige1, Paulino Barragan-Iglesias1, Carolyn A. Guzman1, Gregory Dussor1, Pradipta R. Ray1,#, Robert W. Gereau IV2, # and Theodore J. Price1, # 1The University of Texas at Dallas, School of Behavioral and Brain Sciences and Center for Advanced Pain Studies, 800 W Campbell Rd. Richardson, TX, 75080, USA 2Washington University Pain Center and Department of Anesthesiology, Washington University School of Medicine # corresponding authors [email protected], [email protected] and [email protected] Funding: NIH grants T32DA007261 (LM); NS065926 and NS102161 (TJP); NS106953 and NS042595 (RWG). The authors declare no conflicts of interest Author Contributions Conceived of the Project: PRR, RWG IV and TJP Performed Experiments: AW, LAM, CP, PB-I Supervised Experiments: GD, RWG IV, TJP Analyzed Data: AW, LAM, CP, CAG, PRR Supervised Bioinformatics Analysis: PRR Drew Figures: AW, PRR Wrote and Edited Manuscript: AW, LAM, CP, GD, PRR, RWG IV, TJP All authors approved the final version of the manuscript. 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/766865; this version posted September 12, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
  • Adverse Effects of Stress on Drug Addiction

    Adverse Effects of Stress on Drug Addiction

    Making a bad thing worse: adverse effects of stress on drug addiction Jessica N. Cleck, Julie A. Blendy J Clin Invest. 2008;118(2):454-461. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI33946. Review Series Sustained exposure to various psychological stressors can exacerbate neuropsychiatric disorders, including drug addiction. Addiction is a chronic brain disease in which individuals cannot control their need for drugs, despite negative health and social consequences. The brains of addicted individuals are altered and respond very differently to stress than those of individuals who are not addicted. In this Review, we highlight some of the common effects of stress and drugs of abuse throughout the addiction cycle. We also discuss both animal and human studies that suggest treating the stress- related aspects of drug addiction is likely to be an important contributing factor to a long-lasting recovery from this disorder. Find the latest version: https://jci.me/33946/pdf Review series Making a bad thing worse: adverse effects of stress on drug addiction Jessica N. Cleck and Julie A. Blendy Department of Pharmacology, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA. Sustained exposure to various psychological stressors can exacerbate neuropsychiatric disorders, including drug addiction. Addiction is a chronic brain disease in which individuals cannot control their need for drugs, despite negative health and social consequences. The brains of addicted individuals are altered and respond very differently to stress than those of individuals who are not addicted. In this Review, we highlight some of the common effects of stress and drugs of abuse throughout the addiction cycle.
  • Neutrophil Chemoattractant Receptors in Health and Disease: Double-Edged Swords

    Neutrophil Chemoattractant Receptors in Health and Disease: Double-Edged Swords

    Cellular & Molecular Immunology www.nature.com/cmi REVIEW ARTICLE Neutrophil chemoattractant receptors in health and disease: double-edged swords Mieke Metzemaekers1, Mieke Gouwy1 and Paul Proost 1 Neutrophils are frontline cells of the innate immune system. These effector leukocytes are equipped with intriguing antimicrobial machinery and consequently display high cytotoxic potential. Accurate neutrophil recruitment is essential to combat microbes and to restore homeostasis, for inflammation modulation and resolution, wound healing and tissue repair. After fulfilling the appropriate effector functions, however, dampening neutrophil activation and infiltration is crucial to prevent damage to the host. In humans, chemoattractant molecules can be categorized into four biochemical families, i.e., chemotactic lipids, formyl peptides, complement anaphylatoxins and chemokines. They are critically involved in the tight regulation of neutrophil bone marrow storage and egress and in spatial and temporal neutrophil trafficking between organs. Chemoattractants function by activating dedicated heptahelical G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). In addition, emerging evidence suggests an important role for atypical chemoattractant receptors (ACKRs) that do not couple to G proteins in fine-tuning neutrophil migratory and functional responses. The expression levels of chemoattractant receptors are dependent on the level of neutrophil maturation and state of activation, with a pivotal modulatory role for the (inflammatory) environment. Here, we provide an overview
  • Celsr1-3 Cadherins in PCP and Brain Development

    Celsr1-3 Cadherins in PCP and Brain Development

    CHAPTER SEVEN Celsr1–3 Cadherins in PCP and Brain Development Camille Boutin, André M. Goffinet1, Fadel Tissir1 Institute of Neuroscience, Developmental Neurobiology, Universite´ Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium 1Corresponding authors: Equal contribution. e-mail address: [email protected]; andre. [email protected] Contents 1. Celsr1–3 Expression Patterns 164 2. Celsr1: A Major Player in Vertebrate PCP 165 3. Celsr2 and 3 in Ciliogenesis 169 4. Celsr1–3 in Neuronal Migration 171 5. Celsr2 and Celsr3 in Brain Wiring 174 5.1 Motifs of Celsr important for their functions 176 References 179 Abstract Cadherin EGF LAG seven-pass G-type receptors 1, 2, and 3 (Celsr1–3) form a family of three atypical cadherins with multiple functions in epithelia and in the nervous system. During the past decade, evidence has accumulated for important and distinct roles of Celsr1–3 in planar cell polarity (PCP) and brain development and maintenance. Although the role of Celsr in PCP is conserved from flies to mammals, other functions may be more distantly related, with Celsr working only with one or a subset of the classical PCP partners. Here, we review the literature on Celsr in PCP and neural devel- opment, point to several remaining questions, and consider future challenges and possible research trends. Celsr1–3 genes encode atypical cadherins of more than 3000 amino acids ( Fig. 7.1). Their large ectodomain is composed of nine N-terminal cadherin repeats (typical cadherins have five repeats), six epidermal growth factor (EGF)-like domains, two laminin G repeats, one hormone receptor motif (HRM), and a G-protein-coupled receptor proteolytic site (GPS).